Columbia  (Hnitiersttp 
intl)eCitpof3^rttigork 

THE   LIBRARIES 


Bequest  of 

Frederic  Bancroft 

1860-1945 


COMPREHENSIVE  VIEW 

OF  THE 

.EADING  AND  MOST  IMPORTAF'^  PRINCIPLES 

OF 

NATURAL  AND  REVEALFiD 
KELIGIOISr: 


J>1GEST*D  IN  SUCH  ORDER  AS  TO  PRESENT  TO  THK  "IOCS  AND  REFLECTITiC 

MIND,  A  BASIS  FOR  THE  SUPERSTRUCTURE  OF  THE  ENTIRg 

SYSTEM  OF  THE  DOCTRINES  OF  THE  GOSPEL, 


BY  THE  REV.  SAMUEL  STANHOPE  SMITH,  D.D.  L.L.D 

LITB  PRESIDENT  OF  THE  COI.LBGJ:  OF  NEW-JERSSY. 


Second  Edition — with  additions. 


NEW-BRUNSWICK: 

Printed  and  Publislied  by  Deare  .V  Mver. 
1816, 


"W 


District  of  Nerv-Jerati/,  aj. 

Be  it  P.EMEMBER2D,  that  on  the  twenty-fourth  day  of  August,  m 
the  fortieth  year  of  the  Independence  cf  the  T.'r-ited  Statts  o"  America, 
Deaie  &;  Myer.  of  tlie  ^aid  district  hue  de  osited  in  lir.?  ofFce,  tl-.e  title  of  a 
book,  the  right  '.vhereof  tl.ey  claim  as  proprietors,  in  the  woiJs  following,  to  wit: 
*'  A  Comprehensive  View  oi  the  leading  and  nict  important  orinciples  of  Na- 
*'tuial  and  Revealed  Relidon,  digested  in  -uoh  order  as  to  pre  ent  to  the  pioua 
*'  and  reflecting  niiud,  a  basis  for  the  superstructure  of  the  entire  "vstem  of  the 
"doctrines  of  the  Gospel.  Bv  the  Rev,  Samuel  Stanhope  Smith,  D.D.  L.L.D. 
"  late  President  of  the  College  of  N^w-Jersev  ^ 

In  confornoity  to  an  aci  or  the  Cor^cress  oi  the  United  States,  entitled.  "  Ao 
act  i'^r  the  encoura Lenient  of  learning,  by  securin?  the  copie?  of  naps,  charts, 
and  hooks,  to  tlie  anihor:^  and  proprieters  of  such  copies,  o  iring  the  times 
therein  mentioned  ;"  and  al«o  to  the  act,  entilled.  '  An  act  suoplementarv  to 
the  act,  <^r;itled  an  act  for  the  cncouragemcDi  o;  leaniing,  by  sccurir:^  ti'e  cop- 
ies  o.  map-,  -^harts  an(j  honks,  to  Vas  a  ithors  ar-d  pro-jrietorsofsuch  copies,  daring 
ilii  limes  the;  ein  mentioned,  and  extending  the  benefit;  th<^reof  to  the  arts  of  de- 
iigaing,  engraving  and  etching,  historical  and  other  nrii.ts." 

ROBERT  B0GG9, 
Clerk  of  (ht  District  of  Nm-Jers ty. 

\ 


■^  ^*f 


PRELIMINARY  NOTICES 


REFLECTIONS. 


jVO  donbt  ran  exist  in  the.  mind  of  a  judirionsv.hristian,  hut  that 
the  Sacred  Scriptures  comprise  the  most  complete  development  of 
the  entire  system  of  our  holy  religion.  But  the  extent  and  variety 
of  information  which  they  embrace,  the  loose  and  narrative  style  in 
which  a  great  portion  of  them  is  written,  and  the  picturesque  and 
poetic  imagery  in  which  others  are  clothed,  have  presented  an  occa- 
sion both  to  ingenious  and  to  feeble  minded  men,  to  build  upon  them 
a  multitude  of  contending  opinions,  each  supported  by  detached  ex- 
pressions collected  from  these  divine  oracles,  or  by  interpretations, 
either  plausible  or  forced,  imposed  upon  their  language.  Divines, 
in  order  to  correct  or  restrain  this  ambiguous  diversity  of  senti- 
ment, have  endeavoured  to  reduce  the  whole  of  the  doctrines  f  the 
sacred  writings  to  certain  definite  principles,  arranged  in  scientific 
order,  so  as  mutually  to  illustrate  and  support  one  another.  This 
would  have  been  a  scheme  sufficiently  rational,  if  system  writers 
liad  confined  their  object  to  digesting  the  diffusive  and  expanded 
phraseology  of  the  scriptures  into  a  few  simple  and  connected  pro- 
positions, intended  to  present  the  substance  of  the  whole  to  the 
mind,  under  one  view.  But  their  design  has  become  so  mingled 
with  tlie  discordant  theories  of  dilFerent  writers,  that  their  extend- 
ed discussions  on  each  topic  have  often  destroyed  the  simphcity  of 
the  gospel,  and  led  their  readers,  as  well  as  disposed  the  writei's 


themselves,  to  substitute  human  reason  for  the  word  of  God.    I«i 

fStead  t  prescr-L;wg  a  brief  analysis  of  the  doctrines  contained  in  the 
Bible,  they  have  too  frequently  attempted  to  make  their  respective 
explanations  of  the  system  of  divine  truth  an  entire  hbrary  of  theo- 
logical science  : — It  has  occurred  to  the  author  that  it  would  be  de- 
sirable to  students  in  that  sphere  of  knowledge,  to  have  its  princi- 
pal subjects  distinctly  pointed  out,  and  clearly  illustrated,  in  a  short 
compass,  in  order  to  direct  their  future  inquiries,  and  so  to  guard 
their  future  addresses  from  the  pulpit,  from  blending  discordant 
opinions ;  that  they  should,  in  no  pomt,  err  against  the  general  sys- 
tem of  evangehc  truth.  He  further  hoped  that  such  a  compen- 
dious view  might  usefully  aid  the  private  christian,  in  examining 
the  sacred  scriptures,  and  pursuing  throughout  the  whole  the  con- 
nected thread  of  christian  doctrine. 

These  are  the  objects  to  which  his  attention  has  been  chiefly  di- 
rected in  the  following  discourses,  designed  to  embrace  a  very  com- 
pendious scheme  of  the  leading  principles  of  Natural  and  Revealed 
Theology.  When  these  leadmg  principles  are  fixed  they  become 
centers  in  which  all  the  doctrines  in  that  branch  of  the  sci- 
ence naturally  inhere,  and  diverging  from  which,  they  are  easily 
traced  by  the  judicious  reader.  This  design  very  early  occupied 
his  mind,  while  pursuing  his  own  studies  under  the  superintendence 
of  that  eminent  and  learned  divine,  the  late  Rev.  Dr.  Witherspoon. 
At  the  request  of  a  number  of  young  men,  in  the  year  1772y  gradu^ 
ates  of  the  college,  at  that  time  residing  in  the  institution  for  the 
prosecution  of  their  theological  studies,  of  whom  the  author  was 
one,  the  doctor  was  prevailed  on  to  commence  a  course  of  lectures 
on  this  subject,  which  he  continued  once  a  week  till  the  Autumn  of 
1773y  when  different  objects  of  pursuit  in  life  attracting  the  greater 
portion  of  the  class,  it  was  of  course  dissolved.    The  doctor  haii 


proceeded  in  his  course,  intermixing  his  lectures  with  much  extem- 
pore illustration,  as  far  as  to  the  Covenant  of  Grace.  The  clear 
method  which  he  pursued  is,  on  many  subjects,  particularly  the 
T'nmYi/ and  the  Covenants,  in  many  of  its  outhnes  adopted.  The 
author  arbnowledges  with  pi-irle,  the  assistance  derived  from  notes, 
taken  at  that  time  from  the  mouth  of  the  speaker.  Of  these  lec- 
tures the  most  copious  abridgment,  which  was,  or  probably  could 
be  made  by  any  gentlemen  not  acquainted  with  the  art  of  stenogra- 
phy, has  been  published  by  the  editor  of  Dr.  Witherspoon's  works, 
though  with  much  imperfection,  as  was  naturally  to  be  expected. 
And,  if  the  venerable  man  had  lived,  he  would,  probably,  have  been 
little  pleased  in  seeing  this,  and  several  other  mutilated  productions 
of  his  pen,  accompanying  his  more  perfect  works.*  It  is  greatly 
to  be  lamented,  that  many  circumstances,  after  the  design  was  com- 
menced, concurred  to  prevent  its  execution.  The  judicious  reader 
who  is  best  acquainted  with  Dr.  Witherspoon's  manner,  will  pro- 
bably find  little  affinity  in  these  discourses,  with  his  writings  ;  yet 
the  author  is  not  conscious  that  they  contain  opinions,  on  any  prin- 
ciples of  rehgion,  materially  varying  from  those  which  that  great 
jtian  was  known  to  adopt.  Any  comcidences  of  sentiment  in  the 
subjects  treated  by  us  in  common,  may  easily  be  traced,  if  any  per- 
son have  the  curiosity,  by  comparing  these  discourses  with  that 
abridgment.  Diversity  in  the  manner  of  proposing  them  to  the 
world,  ought  to  be  expected,  even  in  a  pupil  who  admires  his  mas- 

*  During  his  life  a  printer  in  New-Jersey  was  commencing  an  edition  of  his 
Moral  Philosophy  in  its  present  imperfect  state.  He  was  arrested  in  its  pro* 
gress,  by  being  threatened  with  a  legal  prosecution.  This  event  caused  the 
doctor  a  year  or  two  before  liis  death,  to  direct  the  burning  of  a  very  large  num- 
ber of  his  manuscripts  by  his  late  wife,  he  himself  being  blind.  His  Moral  Phi- 
losophy, and  Lectures  on  Criticism,  would  probably  have  shared  the  same  fate 
if  many  copies  of  both  had  not  been  preserved  by  his  students.  Thef  wer«  used 
merely  as  texts. 


ter.  The  principles  which  they  contain  have  long  been  the  basis 
of  religious  instructions  communicated  first  to  the  students  at 
Hampden-Sidney,  in  Virginia,  and  since  to  a  theological  class  in 
the  college  of  New-Jersey.  And  lately,  the  author  has  employed 
many  of  the  leisure  moments  afforded  him,  by  the  8:nndnpss  of  pro- 
Tidence,  in  the  course  of  a  tedious  disorder,  in  reviewing,  correct- 
ing, and  arranging  them  in  their  present  form,  for  the  press. 

It  is  his  earnest  prayer  that  the  following  pages  may  contribute 
in  any  degree  to  elucidate  the  doctrines  of  the  holy  scriptures,  not 
to  the  learned  only,  but  to  the  humblest  christian,  for  which,  being 
freed,  as  much  as  possible,  from  all  metaphysical  discussion,  he 
^.opes  they  will  be  found  to  be  usefully  adapted. 


CONTENTS. 


Page 

Oir  Natural  Theology,          .               .               .               .               .  H 

Evidences  of  the  Christian  ReligioD,            ,                .                .  .73 

The  Trinity,  or  Three-Fold  Existence  of  the  Deity,           .               .  229 

Of  the  Decrees  of  God,                 ,                .                .                .  .257 

Of  the  Covenant  of  Works  and  the  Fall  of  Man,                 .                .  301 

Of  the  Covenant  of  Grace,           .               .               .               «  .      343 

Of  Sanctification,                    ...                .               ,  375 

Ofthe  Nature  of  Faith,                 .                .                .                .•  .399 

Of  Justification,      ......  415 

Ofthe  External  Seals  ofthe  Covenant  of  Grace — 1.  of  Baptism,  441 

2.  Of  the  Lord's  Supper,        .                .                .                ,                .  483 

On  a  Future  State,        .                .                .                               .  .501 

ASkrm^w,             ...  521 


ERRATA. 

Page  ^34  line  2  from  boltoin,  for  ^VKtj  read  "irvj^ii' 
235  5  for  Heno  Nous  read  Hev  <>  Nous. 

340  5  for  moral  read  natural. 

381  9  for  ai  read  no. 

495  1  for  ecquen  read  ecquem. 

533  3  from  bottom,  for  ofAer  read  oK';. 

539  10  ibr  ijielding  read  nielding. 

5iZ  11  for  insiduously  read  insidimisly' 


A  COMPENDIOUS  SYSTEM 

.  OP 

NATURAL  AND  REYEALED 
THEOLOGY ; 

BMBRACIN6,    IN  THE  SECOND  PART,    A  CONCISE  VIEW   OF 
THE    EVIDENCES  OF  CHRISTIANITY. 

PART  I. 

OF  NATURAL  RELIGION : 

CONTAINING, 
1st.    THE  EVIDENCES  OF  THE  BEING  OF  GOD. 
2d.    THE  PERFECTIONS  OF   GOD. 
3d.    THE  PRINCIPLES   OF  HUMAN  DUTY. 
4th.    THE  PROBABLE  EVIDENCES  OF  A  FUTURE  STATE. 


LECTURES, 

Sic. 


OF  NATURAL  THEOLOGY. 

OF  THE  BEING  OP  GOD. 

Natural  Theology  consists  in  the  knowledge  of  those 
truths  concerning  the  being  and  attributes  of  God  ;  the  prin- 
ciples of  human  duty,  and  the  probable  expectations  of  a  fu- 
ture state  of  existence  to  give  efficacy  to  those  principles, 
which  are  discoverable  by  reason  alone.  It  commences  with 
the  investigation  of  the  evidences  of  the  existence  of  God, 
Almighty,  and  Eternal ;  which  are  usually  derived  from  two 
sources — the  necessary  nature  of  our  ideas — and  the  obvious 
structure  of  the  universe.  Both  these  modes  of  proof,  which 
have  been  distinguished  in  the  schools  by  scientific  terras  of 
discrimination,  rest  on  one  common  principle,  or  necessary- 
idea — that  every  thing  which  begins  to  be,  must  have  a  cause 
of  its  existence.  Admitting  this  truth,  which  cannot  well  be 
controverted  by  reason,  it  results  as  a  necessary  consequence, 
either  that  the  universe  consists  of  an  eternal  succession  of 
causes,  dependent  one  upon  another ;  or  we  must  look  for  its 
existence  in  some  first  principle,  eternal,  unproduced,  the 
source  of  all  motion  and  power  in  the  operations  of  nature, 


ri 

the  cause  of  whose  being  is  to  be  found  onlj  in  itself,  and  (he 
necessity  of  its  own  nature.  The  idea  of  an  eternal  succes- 
sion of  events,  each  frail  and  imperfect,  and  all  dependent, 
one  upon  another,  involves  loo  evident  an  absurdity  to  be 
admitted  by  the  rational  mind.  We  are  obliged  therefore 
to  adopt  the  only  alternative — the  existence  of  an  original 
and  independent  source  of  being,  from  which  all  things  else 
have  been  (derived.  Whence,  then,  exists  this  first  cause  ? 
Original  and  underived  we  can  find  no  reason  of  its  existence 
but  in  the  necessity  of  its  own  nature.  A  being  existing  by 
the  necessity  of  its  own  nature,  can  never  begin  to  be ;  it 
must  be  eternal.  On  the  same  principle,  it  rawst  be  un- 
changeable. If  any  change  could  take  place,  it  would  in- 
volve some  constituent  of  its  nature  which  was  not  neces- 
sary. Infinity  must  be  equally  predicable  of  the  original 
cause  :  for  how  should  it  be  limited  when  nothing  previous 
exists  to  bound  it  ?  or  how  should  necessary  existence  be 
confined  to  a  circumscribed  space  ?  The  unity  of  the  di- 
vine^essence  is  no  less  a  certain  consequence  of  this  original 
principle.  Two  equally  neccessary  and  infinite  beings  could 
serve  no  useful  purpose,  which  could  not  be  equally  fulfilled 
by  one.  There  being  no  reason,  therefore,  for  the  existence 
of  a  second,  the  idea,  on  all  the  rules  of  sound  reasoning  in 
science  ought  to  be  rejected.  Two  essences,  equally  infi- 
nite, must  necessarily  occupy  the  same  place  ;  being  equally 
the  cause  of  ail  things  which  exist,  they  must  possess  the 
same  perfection  *,  they  must  be,  to  every  purpose  of  exigtencc, 


13 

the  same  being.  This  first,  and  sole  cause  of  all  things  iq 
the  universe,  must  also  be  Almighty  ;  for  whatever  can  ex- 
ist, can  exist  only  by  him.  And  finally,  he  must  be  all-wise, 
as  knowing  the  natures  and  powers  of  all  things  possible  ;  for 
nothing  is  possible,  but  by  him,  and  every  thing  is  possible 
that  he  wills. 

This  is  a  very  brief  and  partial  sketch  of  the  scientific 
mode  of  reasoning,  or  reasoning  a  priori,  as  the  schoolmen 
call  it  on  this  subject.  The  most  profound  and  masterly 
example  of  it,  which  exists,  perhaps  in  any  language,  is  to  be 
found  in  the  demonstration  of  the  being  and  attributes  of 
God,  by  Dr.  Samuel  Clarke,  of  England.  But,  I  confess, 
these  subtle  arguments  of  a.  very  refined  speculation,  are  little 
calculated  to  produce  any  deep  and  permanent  conviction  on 
the  mind.  The  extreme  abstraction  of  the  ideas,  although 
they  do  great  credit  to  the  ingenuity  of  that  celebrated  au- 
thor, can  be  comprehended  only  by  a  few  reflecting  men  ; 
and  the  most  speculative  philosopher  finds  the  effort  to  grasp 
them,  exhaust  the  sensibility  of  the  heart,  and  weaken  upoa 
it  the  practical  impressions  of  virtue  and  piety. 

The  second,  or  popular  mode  of  reasoning,  is  infinitely 
more  simple  and  obvious.  And  consists  of  a  species  of  ar- 
gument which  naturally  offers  itself  to  every  man,  as  soon  as 
he  opens  his  eyes  with  intelligence  upon  the  world.  A  kind 
of  evidence  here  suggests  itself  which  reaches  the  simples! 


i 


14 

understandiogy  and  becomes  more  luminous  and  interesting 
in  propoiiion  as  we  extend  our  observation  and  inquiries  in- 
to the  system  of  nature.  When  we  heboid  its#rcler,  varie- 
ty, and  beauty,  the  proportion,  and  correspondence  of  all 
its  parts,  the  manifest  demonstrations  of  wistiom  and  design, 
especially,  in  Ihe  animal  and  vegetable  worlds,  in  the  struc- 
ture of  the  earth,  in  the  planetary  system,  and,  as  far  as  we 
can  judge,  throughout  the  universe,  can  we  forbear  to  ac- 
knowledge a  wise  and  intelligent  cause,  whxh  has  planned 
and  arranged  the  whole  ?  an  omnipotent  cause,  which  has 
giver  existence  to  this  immense,  and  vai/oii^  structure  ?  and 
an  infinite  providence,  which  every  where  presides  over  its 
opprations  ?  The  detail^  of  this  argument  are  too  extensive 
to  be  here  minutely  purbued.  They  are  not  necessary  to 
convince  judicious  readers  of  thai  first  of  truths,  of  which  all, 
who  have  not  speculated  the  heart  into  scepticism,  are  already 
deeply  persuaded,  and  which  meets  our  understanding  at 
every  glance  that  we  capt  over  the  face  of  nature.  Yet  I 
cannot  too  strongly  recommend  to  those,  who  have  the 
means  of  cultivating  the  studies  of  polite  literature,  diligently 
to  pursue  their  .  esearches  into  the  natural  history  of  the  uni- 
verse, expressly  with  this  view,  to  assemble  before  the  mind 
the  multiplied  evidence  which  it  contains,  in  every  part,  of 
the  existence,  and  universal  operation  of  a  most  wise,  and  be- 
neficent, and  almighty  power  which  pervades,  and  presides 
over  the  whole.  It  is  with  this  design  that  I  would  recom- 
mend to  every  disciple  of  science  a  careful  study  of  natural 


15 

histor^i  as  the  surest  basis,  when  prudently  investigated,  of 
natural  theology,  and  an  excellent  introduction  and  support 
to  revelation.  I  reco'nmend  it,  likewise,  as  a  study,  which 
contributes  peculiarly  to  purify,  exalt  and  delight  the  mind  ; 
and,  along  with  the  charming  enthusiasm  of  piety,  to  strength- 
en the  most  solid  foundations  of  virtue,  while,  to  use  an  ex- 
pression of  Malcbranche,  "  it  sees  all  things  in  God,  and  God 
in  all  things." 

This  argument  we  may  see  admirably  illustrated  by  the 
famous  Genevan  philosopher,  Bonnet,  and  by  those  very  re- 
spectable English  writers,  Derham,  and  Ray.  But  perhaps 
no  writer  has  treated  it  with  more  closeness,  perspicuity, 
and  irresistible  evidence,  than  Dr.  Paley,  in  his  treatise  on 
natural  theology.  In  those  works  may  be  seen  that  mechan- 
ical contrivance,  that  correspondence  of  parts,  that  adapta- 
tion of  means  to  their  respective  ends,  through  all  the  pro- 
ductions of  nature,  which  are  the  must  unequivocal  indica- 
tions of  wisdom  and  desij^n,  as  well  as  of  power  and  good- 
ness, in  its  author.  "  Final  cansesy  says  a  very  judicious 
writer,  may  be  considered  as  the  language  in  which  the  ex- 
istence of  God  is  revealed  to  man.  In  this  language,  the  sign 
is  natural,  and  the  interpretation  instinctive."  Ferg.  ins, 
p.  3.  ch.  1.  s.  2. 

Another  argument  to  the  same  end  has  justly  been  derived 
from  tke  universal  concurrence  of  mamkiod  in  the  asserti^tB 


16 

and  belief  of  this  important  principle.  The  general  senti- 
ments of  human  nature  are  always  found  to  point  to  truth. 
Thej  are  intuitive  perceptions  resulting  immediately  from 
the  bare  inspection  of  their  objects ;  or  conclusions  which 
force  their  evidence  upon  the  mind,  like  the  first  truths  of 
science,  necessarily  springing  out  of  the  comparison  of  our 
own  ideas.  The  concurrence  of  all  nations,  in  the  belief  of 
the  being  of  God,  is  a  decisive  proof,  either,  that  it  is  a  na- 
tive sentiment  of  the  human  heart  arising  naturally  from  ori- 
ginal structure  of  constitution,  and  entitled  to  the  same  im- 
plicit credit  as  our  other  moral  principles  ;  or  it  is  an  induc- 
tion so  clearly  and  necessarily  flowing  from  the  phenomena 
of  nature  as  to  be  obvious  equally  to  the  wisest,  and  the  most 
uncultivated  mind  ;  the  rapidity  of  the  conclusion  giving  it 
the  appearance  and  effect  of  an  instinctive  principle. 

To  this  argUQient  it  is  not  a  sufficient  objection,  that  manj 
nations  have  acknowledged  a  multiplicity  of  Gods ;  and  that, 
in  all  nations,  the  multitude  have  entertained  unworthy  con- 
ceptions of  the  divine  nature.  The  natural  sentiments  of 
the  human  mind  may  be  corrupted ;  or,  being  left  in  their 
original  and  uncultivated  state,  may  be  liable,  through  igno- 
rance, to  many  errors.  The  principles  of  taste,  may,  in  like 
manner,  notwithstanding  their  acknowledged  foundation  in 
human  nature,  be  rendered  defective,  or  be  grossly  pervert- 
ed, by  erroneous  culture ;  yet  their  error,  or  corruption,  in- 
stead of  demonstrating  that  there  are  no  such  principles,  ob 


17 

the  other  hand,  a  proof  of  their  existence.     Many  nations, 
misled  by  the  analogy  of  the  divine,  to  human  governments, 
conceiving  that  the  administration  of  the  Deity  might,  more 
honourably,  be   conducted  by  subordinate  agents,  elevated 
each  local   and  imaginary  divinity  to  the  throne  of  divine 
worship.     But  all  mankind  have  ever  acknowledged  one  Su- 
preme  God  :    and   the  multitude  of  subordinate  officers,   if 
they  may  be  called  such,  which  error  had  attached  to  him 
in  his  government,  does  not  destroy  the  evidence  of  the  prin- 
cipal and  original  sentiment  that  God  exists.      Our  object, 
at  present,  is  to  establish  this  single  truth.     And  this  truth 
is  not  destroyed  by  diversity  of  opinion,  with  regard  to  the 
mode  of  his  administration,  or  the  nature  of  his  perfections. 
These  ideas  requiring  greater  precision  of  thought,   and  a 
wider  compass  of  reasoning,  one  man,  or  one  nation,  accord- 
ing to  the  advances  which  they  have  respectively  made  in 
the  cultivation  of  science,  may  reasonably  be  supposed  to 
have  formed  more  just,  or  more  inadequate  conceptions  of 
them  than  another.* 


*  A  native,  which  perhaps  may  be  justly  deemed  an  instinctive  sentiment  of 
Deity,  or  of  that  universal  power  which  presides  over  all  things,  occupies  and 
takes  deep  possession  of  the  human  heart,  in  the  earliest  periods  of  society  and 
the  most  uncultivated  states  of  human  existence.  Hence  has  originated  that 
multitude  of  objects  which  called  forth  the  respect  or  veneration,  or  amused  the 
fancy  of  mankind  in  the  heathen  world ;  and  that  vast  assemblage  of  supernatural 
or  fantastic  bemgs,  which  peopled  the  groves  and  the  forests,  the  hills  and  the 
fountains  of  antiquity.  Men,  unable  to  grasp  the  grand  coniurehensive  idea  of  the 
Supreme  Being,  who  fills  the  universe  witli  his  presence,  yet  conscious  of  God  ia 
everyplace,  invested  all  the  interesting  objects  of  nature  with  some  attributes  of 
divinity.    And  every  situation  which  tended  to  fill  th*  mind,  on  tb§  eot  haod, 

3 


18  f 

The  truth  of  the  divine  existence  ia  confirmed,  if  such 
primary  and  palpable  truths  can  receive  additional  confirma- 
tion, by  the  absurdity  of  the  causes  to  which  atheists  have 
been  obliged  to  resort  in  order  to  account  for  the  origin  of 
things.  One  of  their  first  principles  is,  that  matter  is  eter- 
nal, and,  though  senseless  and  inert,  contains  the  essence  of 
all  order  and  motion.  Another,  that  the  intelligence,  which 
evidently  reigns  in  the  universe,  is  the  result  of  material  or- 
ganization necessarily  arising  from  its  original  and  essential 
principles.  And  another  still,  not  less  extraordinary  than 
either  of  the  preceding,  that,  from  the  accidental  collision  of 
atoms,  have  been  formed  globes,  which,  from  some  interior, 
and  inexplicable  impulse,  have  thrown  themselves  into  or- 
bits constructed  with  the  most  perfect  mathematical  exact- 
ness, and  governed  by  laws  which  ensure  undeviating  con- 
stancy  in  their  movements.  From  the  same  accidental  col- 
lision, roots  and  seeds  have  been  generated,  whence  the 
whole  vegetable  world  has  been  evolved,  and  yearly  repro- 
duced.    At  this  age  of  philosophy,  one  would  think  that 


with  pensive,  or  with  gloomy  thoughlfuiness,  or,  on  the  other,  with  pleasing  fan- 
cies, gave  scope  to  the  creative  powers  of  imagination,  and  replenished  each  dis- 
trict of  the  earth  with  wild  imaginary  forms,  congenial  with  the  present  state  of 
its  fancies,  or  its  fears.  Sages  and  philosophers  themselves  contributed  to  aug- 
ment the  mass  of  superstition,  while  they  studied  to  add  respectability  and  splen- 
dor to  their  temples,  by  personifying  the  principal  attributes  of  the  divine  mind^ 
his  wisdom,  his  truth  and  his  justice ;  and  the  principal  operations  of  a  benignant 
providence,  in  imparting  its  vegetative  powers  to  the  earth,  or  exalting  the  geniuf 
of  mankind  by  resplendent  fictions,  and  embodying  every  idea  that  was  supposed 
useful  to  human  society,  or  ornamental  to  the  arts. 


19 

such  principles  must  carry  their  ovrn  refutation  in  the  very 
terms  of  their  statement.  Observe  any  mass,  or  congeries 
of  matter,  and  let  the  plainest,  or  the  most  improved  under- 
standing decide,  if  any  arrangement  of  atoms,  according  to 
any  known  laws  of  material  action,  could  sublimate  it,  so  as 
to  produce  sensation  and  reason.  Or  is  it  possible,  that,  if 
one  lucky  cast,  or  collision  among  infinite  millions,  should 
have  formed  an  animal  or  vegetable,  it  should  have  been  so 
framed  as  to  be  capable  of  throwing  from  itself  continually  a 
similar  assemblage  of  organized  atoms,  while  not  another 
cast,  of  the  same  kind,  should  ever  succeed  in  forming  anew 
species  of  being. 

If  an  atheist  ask  us,  why,  since  we  admit  the  existence  of 
a  wise  intelligent  cause,  only  t^||Kclude  the  ideas  of  disor- 
der and  chance  from  the  world,  tl^we  see  so  many  unseem- 
ly examples  of  both,  in  the  structure  of  things,  and  in  the  re- 
volutions of  what  we  call  providence  ?  It  is,  I  conceive,  a  suf- 
ficient answer,  to  deny  the  existence  of  either,  and  to  chal- 
lenge an  antagonist  to  produce  that  instance. — For,  what  13 
chance  ? — Only  a  name  to  cover  our  ignorance  of  the  cause 
of  an  event.  Nothing  can  happen  by  accident  in  the  gov- 
ernment of  an  in6nilely  wise,  and  powerful  being.  Al! 
events  depend  upon  a  certain  concatenation  of  causes.  The 
cast  of  a  die  is  as  certainly  governed  by  the  laws  of  matter 
and  motion,  as  the  greater  movements  of  the  planets.  Dis- 
order in  the  works  of  nature  exists  only  in  the  imperfection 


2© 

of  our  own  understanding.  This  is  certain,  with  regard  to 
all  the  arrangements  of  nature,  that,  in  proportion  as  her 
laws  have  been  more  clearly  developed,  and  her  operations 
more  distinctly  understood,  those  phenomena,  which  for- 
merly yrere  esteemed  to  be  irregularities,  are  now  discover- 
ed to  be  directed  by  ihe  most  wise,  certain,  and  permanent 
laws. — One  conclusion  will  obtrude  itself  on  every  reflect- 
ing mind ;  that,  since  nature,  as  far  as  we  can  discern  her 
operations,  contains,  even  to  our  imperfect  reason,  the  most 
obvious  indications  of  intelligence,  design,  and  goodness,  if 
there  be  any  parts  of  it,  which  we  are  unable  to  interpret,  in 
perfect  coincidence  with  the  general  system,  this  ought  to 
be  ascribed  solely  to  the  narrow  sphere  to  which  our  intel- 
lectual vision  is  circumscribed.  We  cannot  doubt,  but  that 
the  same  wisdom,  which  Wt  perceive  in  that  portion  which 
we  do  comprehend,  prevades  all  the  works  of  the  same 
author. 

It  has  been  frequently  and  justly  remarked,  that  the  uni- 
verse is  governed  by  general  laws,  which  never  change  their 
operation  according  to  the  desires  of  men,  or  the  conven- 
ience of  particular  parts  of  the  system,  and,  therefore,  they 
sometimes  appear  to  be  productive  of  partial  and  accidental 
ills.  A  tempest  here,  a  drought  there,  a  contagion,  or  ap 
earthquake,  may  involve  individuals  in  distress ; — but  the 
fixed  and  invariable  laws  of  the  physical  world  are  among 
the  greatest  blessings  to  mankind.     Among  other  benefits, 


21 

(hey  lay  a  foundation  for  the  existence  of  the  most  useful 
sciences  and  arts,  which  could  have  no  principles,  on  which 
to  rest,  in  a  providence  of  expedients,  and  accommodationi 
to  individual  convenience.  They  serve  to  awaken  inquiry, 
to  exercise  ingenuity,  to  encourage  industry,  to  aflford  prin- 
ciples on  which  to  ground  a  prudent  foresight  and  precaution, 
and  to  promote  the  exercise  of  all  the  virtues  which  are  as- 
sisted by  the  stability  of  nature.  For  a  clear  and  lumin- 
ous illustration  of  the  utility  of  general  laws,  and  for  a  judi- 
cious explanation,  and  justification  of  the  apparent  and  par- 
tial ills  which  result  from  them,  you  will  again  have  peculiar 
satisfaction  in  consulting  Dr.  Paley's  work  on  natural  the- 
ology. 

II.  OF  THE  ATTRIBUTES  OF  THE  DEITY. 

The  divine  attributes,  as  discoverable  by  the  powers  of 
natural  reason,  will  not  require  an  extensive  illustration  ;  for, 
when  once  the  existence  of  God  is  acknowledged,  they  re- 
commend themselves  so  obviously  to  the  common  sense  of 
mankind,  as  to  admit  of  little  controversy,  except  with  re- 
gard to  those  natural  events  which,  in  their  first  aspect,  seem 
contrary  to  our  apprehensions  of  his  infinite  goodness. 

The  attributes,  then,  of  the  Divine  Mind  may  be  arrange 
ed  under  two  heads — the  natural,  and  the  moral. — Under 
the  former,  are  comprehended  his  spirituality,  unity,  eterni- 


22 

tj,  omnipresence,  power  and  wisdom  i — under  the   latter, 
his  holiness,  justice,  and  goodness. 

The  spirituality  of  the  divine  nature  is  a  property  oppos- 
ed to  every  form,  or  refinement  of  matter ;  and  may  be  re- 
garded as  distinguishing  the  essence  of  the  Supreme  Mind, 
from  that  fine,  but  powerful  influence,  the  result  of  the  mate- 
rial organizatioD  of  the  universe,  which  some  philosophers 
have  substituted  in  the  room  of  the  Deity,  and  made  the  im- 
medb^e  cause  of  a  universal  necessity,  or  fate.  It  is  oppos- 
ed, likewise,  to  the  opinion  of  those,  who  hold  the  Deity  to 
be  the  soul  of  the  world  ;  that  is,  a  certain  power  which, 
though  intelligent,  is  still  only  a  refinement  of  matter — a  kind 
of  spirit,  or  gas  thrown  oflf  from  the  infinite  system  of  its  mo- 
tions, or  its  original  fermentations. 

All  just  philosophy  has  considered  matter  as  essentially 
inert,  and  incapable  of  beginning  motion.  Spirit,  as  we 
learn  from  our  own  experience,  possesses  a  self-motive  pow- 
er, and  the  power  of  giving  motion  to  other  things.  The 
existence  and  the  movements  of  the  universe,  therefore,  are 
proofs  of  an  original  Spirit,  who  formed  it,  and  gave  it  that 
impulse,  and  that  system  of  combined  motion  by  which  its 
order  is  still  preserved. 

The  only  knowledge,  which  we  have  of  spirit,  is  derived 
from  reflection  on  our  own  minds,  the  essence  of  which  we 


23 

conceive  to  lie  in  thought  and  volition.  But  it  would  be  im- 
pious to  imagine,  that  we  can  thence  frame  any  adequate  cou- 
'  ception  of  the  Divine  and  Infinite  Spirit  from  whom  all  things 
proceed.  By  this  term,  therefore,  applied  to  the  Deity,  we 
can  mean  only  to  express  a  substance  wholly  diflferent  from 
matter,  simple,  uncompounded,  essentially  active  and  in- 
telligent. 

^  The  Unity  of  the  divine  nature  is  deducible  from  this  re- 
flection, that  we  see  evident  proofs  of  the  existence  of  one 
God,  and  we  see  no  evidence  of  more  than  one.  And  it  is 
contrary  to  every  principle  of  just  reasoning,  in  that  caf5e,  to 
admit  a  pluraHty.  This  conclusion  is  strengthened  by  that 
unity  of  design  apparent  in  all  the  parts  of  nature.  It  indicates 
one  author,  one  purpose,  one  end.  How  far  he  may  com- 
mit the  government  of  particular  districts  of  the  universe  to 
subordinate  agents,  in  order  to  employ  their  activity,  and  ex- 
ercise their  virtues,  we  have  no  grounds  on  which  we  can 
form  a  rational  judgment.  Even  conjecture,  therefore,  ought 
to  be  silent  concerning  it,  lest  we  should  unawares  awaken  a 
degrading  spirit  of  superstition.  On  subjects  so  remote  from 
the  sphere  of  human  intellect  and  observation,  in  no  depart- 
ment of  science,  has  conjecture  or  hypothesis  ever  led  phi- 
losophy one  step  nearer  to  truth.  It  is  even  doubtful  if  the 
erring  lights  of  false  science  do  not  lead  the  mind  farther 
astray  from  the  true  principles  of  nature,  than  the  torpid  dull- 
ness of  absolute  ignorance. 


24 

Of  (he  almighty  power,  and  iofinite  wisdom  of  the  Deity, 
there  can  exist  no  doubt  in  the  minds  of  those  who  ac- 
knowledge his  being.  No  more  can  we  doubt  of  his  eternal 
existence,  and  universal  presence,  although  we  are  not  able 
to  form  distinct  and  definite  ideas  concerning  his  relations  to 
infinite  duration  and  space.  I  shall,  therefore,  not  consume 
your  time  in  attempting  to  solve  the  many  abstruse  and  proba- 
bly useless,  and,  to  human  intellect,  inexplicable  questions, 
which  have  been  raised  on  these  subjects  by  ingenious 
men ; — but  proceed  io  consider  his  moral  attributes,  holi- 
ness, goodness,  and  justice. 

Holiness  is  a  term  used  chiefly  by  divines,  and  borrowed 
from  the  sacred  scriptures,  to  express  the  purity  of  the  di- 
vine nature,  and  its  infinite  distance  from  all  moral  imper- 
fection. It  is,  perhaps,  the  best  and  strongest  word  in  our 
language  to  convey  the  idea  of  his  unchangeable  love  of  the 
eternal  and  essential  rectitude  of  the  moral  law,  which  he 
has  prescribed  to  his  rational  creatures,  the  outlines  of  which 
he  has  traced  upon  the  human  conscience,  but  its  perfect 
rule,  is  to  be  found  only  in  his  revealed' word.  And  it 
seems  further  to  carry  in  its  meaning,  not  only  a  pure  and 
immutable  love  of  rectitude,  but  an  infinite  abhorrence  of 
vice  ;  that  is,  of  the  omission,  or  the  violation  of  the  duties  of 
the  moral  law.  But,  besides  this  peculiar  meaning  of  the 
term,  as  expressing  a  single  attribute  of  the  divine  mind,  it  is 
•ften  used  in  a  more  comprehensive  sense,  to  express  the 


25 

aggregate,  and  the  most  complete  idea  of  all  his  moral  per- 
fections.— Perhaps  the  philosophy  of  Paganism  may  never 
have  perfectly  reached  these  just  conceptions  of  the  divine 
character,  but,  certainly,  they  are  the  dictates  of  enlight- 
ened reason.  And  whatever  absurdities  are  discoverable 
in  the  vulgar  superstition,  concerning  (he  inferior  deities  of 
the  heathen;  yet,  among  their  wiser  sages,  their  supreme 
God  was  invested  with  all  the  moral  virtues  and  perfections 
'  indicated  by  natural  conscience. 

By  the  attribute  of  goodness  is  meant  to  be  expressed 
the  disposition  or  tendency  of  the  Divine  Nature  to  impart 
happiness  to  the  creatures  he  has  formed,  in  a  way  accom- 
modated to  their  respective  states  of  being.  This  attribute 
we  ascribe  to  the  Deity  from  the  tendencies  to  benevolent 
affection,  which  he  has  implanted  in  the  human  breast ;  and 
from  that  order,  harmony,  and  beauty,  which  exist  in  the 
whole  structure  of  the  universe,  and  which,  so  naturally  and 
strongly,  associate  themselves  with  the  ideas  of  beneficence 
in  their  author.  It  is  farther  confirmed  by  the  existence  of 
so  many  tribes  of  creatures  capable  in  a  high  degree  of 
pleasurable  sensation,  and  actually  enjoying  it  in  different 
ways.  All  these  facts  contribute  to  impress  on  the  mind  an 
irresistible  conviction  of  the  benevolence  of  the  Creator. 
When  we  contemplate  an  individual  animal,  what  an  im- 
mense complexity  of  parts  do  we  observe  combined  in  one 

system,  all  contributing  to  the  preservation  and  enjoyment 

4 


526 

of  the  creature,  which  manifestly  indicate  the  m\\  and  in* 
tention  of  the  author ;  and  show  the  pains  and  contrivance, 
sf  these  terms  may  be  applied  to  the  Deity,  which  he  has  used 
to  render  that  creature  comfortable  and  happy.  But,  when  we 
behold  creation  filled  with  innumerable  species  of  being,  and, 
under  each  species,  innumerable  individuals,  down  to  the 
meanest  insect  tribes,  in  which  we  discern  th^same  multi- 
plicity of  organs,  and  the  same  systematic  combination  and 
subserviency  to  the  purposes  of  enjoyment,  how  does  the 
evidence  of  the  divine  benignity  and  goodness  rise  in  our 
view  ?  The  air,  the  earth,  the  sea,  are  full  of  animated  and 
happy  being.  Men  often  overlook  these  examples  of  be- 
nevolent design,  sometimes,  from  not  perceiving  the  immedi- 
ate utility  of  the  creatures  in  the  system  of  creation,  and 
Sometimes,  from  their  extreme  minuteness.  But  the  minutest 
insect,  is,  equally  with  the  largest  or  most  rational  animal, 
susceptible  of  the  most  exquisite  sensations  of  happy  ex- 
istence. And,  in  the  eye  of  the  infinite  being,  there  is 
much  less  difference  between  an  insect  and  a  man,  than  our 
vanity  inclines  us  to  conceive.  Every  creature,  in  its  re- 
spective sphere,  is  destined  to  some  useful  purpose  in  the 
universal  system^ 

It  is  well  remarked  by  natural  historians,  that  the  benigni- 
ty of  the  Deity  is  visible,  not  only  in  the  structure  of  animal 
nature,  subserving  so  admirably  the  purposes  of  preserva- 
tion, comfort,  and  defence  j  but  in  annexing  such  agreeable 


27 

and  pleasant  sensations,  beyond  what  mere  necessity  requii'- 
ed  for  subsistence,  to  the  gratification  of  all  the  apetites, 
and  even  the  exercise  of  all  the  powers  of  animal  nature. 
Hunger  alone  would  have  been  sufficient  to  prompt  men  to 
eat,  an  operation  requisite  for  the  sustenance  of  life.  But 
the  Creator  has  added  to  our  food  a  relish,  which  seems  to 
have  had  no  other  purpose,  but  to  increase  the  pleasure  of 
existence.  The  objects  around  us,  in  the  structure  of  the 
world,  might  have  been  applied  to  all  the  purposes  of  utility? 
although  they  had  not  possesessed  that  beauty,  fragrance,  or 
harmony,  which  affords  such  charms  to  the  senses  and  the 
imagination.  There,  certainly,  never  could  have  existed 
8uch  exquisite  adaptations  of  objects  to  the  senses,  and  of  the 
senses  to  their  objects,  if  the  Creator  had  not  intended  them 
for  the  ends  of  animal,  and  especially  of  human  felicitj^ 
Not  to  mention  in  man  his  superior  powers  of  moral,  intel- 
lectual, and  social  enjoyment,  which  open  a  much  wider 
and  nobler  field  of  happiness  to  human  nature. 

But  it  is  scarcely  requisite  to  spend  your  time  in  proving 
the  reality  of  the  divine  goodness,  which  is  borne  in  so  many 
examples  on  the  whole  face  of  nature,  as  to  account  for 
some  appearances,  and  to  remove  some  objections,  which 
have  been  thought  to  contradict  it  in  the  order  of  divine 
providence.  These  consist  in  the  numerous  evils  evidently 
mingled  with  good  in  the  economy  of  the  world. 


28 

The  preponderance  of  good  over  evil,  in  the  general  or- 
der of  things,  is  acknowledged  to  be  manifest  and  great.  But 
the  objectors  reply,  that  if  God  were  perfectly  benevolent, 
and,  at  the  same  time,  omnipotent,  he  would  not  have  per- 
mitted the  existence  of  partial  evil.  This  is  pronouncing  on 
an  infinite  system  from  our  contracted  views. — Can  we  say, 
that,  in  a  universe  benevolently  constructed,  there  ought  to 
be  no  gradation  of  being  ?  Or,  if  gradation  be  admitted  in 
perfect  consistency  with  the  infinite  benignity  of  the  Crea- 
tor, is  it  not  conceivable  that  a  creature  of  superior  powers, 
of  intelligence  and  enjoyment,  may,  by  a  certain  admixture 
of  pain,  be  brought,  in  the  scale  of  happiness,  to  the  grade 
of  one  of  inferior  powers,  but  exempt  from  suffering,  and 
who  shall  have  no  complaint  to  prefer  against  the  benevo- 
lence of  providence?  The  reflection  may  apply  to  a  na- 
tion, to  a  species  of  being,  to  a  world.  How  far  superior, 
then,  may  this  world  be,  with  all  its  sufierings,  to  other 
Bysteras — which  have  no  such  evils  to  allay  a  happiness, 
which,  however,  may  be  constituted  on  an  inferior  standard 
of  sensibility,  or  of  intellect  ?  Would  a  man  of  high  sensi- 
bilities, or  of  high  intellectual  powers,  though  they  may  often 
be  the  occasion  of  many  errors,  or  of  keen  anguish,  be  wil- 
ling to  forego  their  pleasures,  in  order  that  he  might  be  re- 
duced to  an  apathy  that  would  render  him  insensible  to  suf- 
fering ?  Let  us  balance  our  goods  against  our  evils,  our  saf- 
ferings  against  our  enjoyments,  and  consider  ourselves  as 
completely  happy  in  that  grade  of  felicity,  which  is  marked 


29 

by  the  surplus  of  the  one  above  the  other.  By  such  a  cal- 
culation, how  might  mankind  extinguish  every  complaint  of 
the  evils  of  life,  and  justify  perfectly  the  benignity  of  the 
Creator.  The  conclusion,  therefore,  which  each  individual 
ought,  in  this  way,  to  frame  with  respect  to  himself,  a  true 
philosopher  may  justly  infer  for  the  whole  species;  unless 
any  man  should  be  so  foolish  as  to  imagine,  that  existence 
alone  gives  him  a  claim  on  the  beneficence  of  his  Maker  for 
the  highest  grade  of  felicity. 

But,  why,  it  may  be  asked,  should  we  be  left  to  estimate 
our  grade  in  the  scale  of  happy  being  by  the  surplusage  of 
pleasure  above  pain  ?  or  why  should  pain  exist  at  all  in  the 
system  of  a  purely  benevolent  being? — Satisfactorily  to  an- 
swer these,  and  a  thousand  other  inquiries,  which  might  be 
instituted  on  this  subject,  would,  probably,  require  a  knowledge 
of  the  nature,  and  the  infinite  relations  of  the  universe,  which 
none  but  the  Deity  hiuiself  can  possess.  We  can,  there- 
fore, expect  only  from  revelation  the  information  which  we 
desire,  as  far  as  he  is  pleased  to  impart  it.  But  while  we 
are  compelled  to  resort  to  the  feeble  lights  of  our  own  reason 
alone,  for  a  solution  of  the  difficulties  which  spring  out  of  the 
combinations  of  an  infinite  system,  we  must  be  contented  with 
such  probabilities  only  as  it  can  yield  us.*     If,  in  the  scale 


*  Rejoicing,  however,  that  when  we  have  explored  reason  to  the  utmost,  we, 
as  christians,  still  enjoy  the  superior  illumination  of  the  sacred  scriptures,  whence, 
if  we  cannot  derive  such  lights  as  will  satisfy  every  inquiry  of  an  ambitious  curi- 


30 

of  existence,  then,  there  be  a  place  for  such  a  being  as  man, 
with  just  such  a  measure  of  intellect,  and  sensibility,  and  with 
just  such  princijjles  of  action,  continually  requiring  excite- 
ment, and  correction  ;  and,  especially,  if  it  be  conceived 
that  he  is  placed  in  the  present  world,  in  a  state  of  discipline, 
and  probation,  for  a  future  period,  and  a  higher  condition  of 
existence,  a  supposition  which,  to  philosophy,  is  as  proba- 
ble, as,  to  religion,  it  is  certain,  may  not  all  the  pains  which 
enter  into  the  moral  culture  of  this  life,  be  regarded  as  the 
discipline  of  a  wise  and  gracious  parent,  and,  therefore,  as 
essential  parts  of  a  most  benevolent  system  ?  Let  us  con- 
template the  relation  which  the  pains  necessarily  incident  to 
human  nature,  as  it  is  now  constituted,  have  to  the  improve- 
ment of  its  powers,  and,  consequently,  to  its  happiness. 
The  wants  of  man  contribute  to  rouse  the  industry,  and  ha- 
bitual exertion  of  all  his  faculties  of  body,  and  mind,  on 
which  their  vigor,  and  perfection  principally  depend.  A  pa- 
radise, in  which  all  his  wants  should  be  spontaneously  sup- 
plied from  the  abundance  of  the  soil,  and  all  his  senses  grat- 
ified by  it!3  fragrance,  its  beauty,  and  luxuriant  sweets, 
would  deteriorate  the  human  character,  and  sink  the  noblest 
creature  in  the  world  into  a  lazy,  torpid,  and  vicious  animal. 
^      The  happinesiS,  no  less  than  the  improvement  of  our  nature. 


03ity,  we  may,  at  least,  draw  competent  satisfaction  for  an  humble  and  rational 
piety ;  particularly,  with  regard  to  this  question,  why  human  nature  exist?  in  its 
present  state  of  imperfection,  requiring  tlie  corrections  and  discipline  of  the  paifts 
and,  Bufferings,  which  in  thij  state  are  attached  to  it? 


31 

lies  chiefly  in  constant,  and  useful  employment,  stimulated 
by  these  necessary  wants.  Enjoyment  seldom  yields  plea- 
sures equal  to  those,  which  arise  out  of  the  activity  requisite 
to  procure  it.  The  very  efforts  excited  by  pain,  or  want,  in 
all  ordinary  cases,  or  by  the  apprehension  of  them,  oflen 
produce  a  satisfaction,  or  diversion  to  the  mind,  which  far 
overbalance  their  evils.  Want  whets  ingenuity ;  danger 
and  suffering  call  into  operation  the  virtues  of  courage  and 
fortitude,  which  communicate  a  character  of  grandeur,  and 
nobleness  to  the  mind,  which  often  raise  it  superior  to  the  ills 
of  life.  And  labour,  however  it  might  be  the  curse  of  man 
fallen  from  the  perfection  of  a  superior  nature,  is,  beyond  a 
doubt,  the  blessing  of  his  present  existence.  Reflections  of 
a  similar  nature  might  arise  from  an  attentive  consideration  of 
every  particular  evil  to  which  human  life  is  exposed.  And, 
in  a  moral  point  of  view,  how  much  more  justly  may  we  re- 
gard them  as  a  part  of  the  benevolent  discipline  of  our 
heavenly  Father?  They  are  the  correctors  of  the  pas- 
sions— they  assist  the  habits  of  reflection — and  often  recall 
the  mind  from  pursuits  injurious  to  its  virtue,  and  its  true 
interests. 

But,  instead  of  examining  the  various  evils  of  life,  and  shew- 
ing how  the  goodness  of  God  is  affected  in  permitting  their 
existence,  I  shall  select  only  a  few ;  believing  that,  if,  in 
these,  the  benevolence  of  the  divine  administration  can  be 
justified,  even  to  our  limited  understanding,  a  hint  may  be 


32 

suggested,  or  a  clue  given,  by  which  ils  vindication  may  be 
pursued  in  other  cases. — For  example,  take  the  circumstan- 
ces attending  our  entrance  into  the  world,  and  our  departure 
from  it,  which  have  been  thought  to  involve  serious  objec- 
tions against  the  benignity  of  the  Creator.  With  regard  to 
the  former,  it  may  be  fairly  maintained,  that  the  pains  of 
bearing,  nursing,  and  educating  children,  with  the  diseases 
and  dangers  of  infancy,  which  seem,  at  first  view,  to  be  pe- 
culiar afflictions  on  the  human  race,  will  be  found,  on  ex- 
amining their  connexions,  and  all  their  relations,  to  be  among 
the  chief  causes  of  the  existence  of  society,  and  the  felicity 
of  social  life.  If  children,  like  the  young  of  other  animals, 
were  able  to  run  as  soon  as  born,  and  procure  their  own  sub- 
sistence, with  almost  no  dependence  on  the  care  of  a  parent, 
the  powerful  ties,  and  sweet  endearments  of  parental  affec- 
tion, and  of  filial  duty,  would  be,  in  a  great  measure,  un- 
known. The  union  and  happiness  of  domestic  society 
would  be  dissolved  ;  and  civil  society,  of  which  domestic  is 
the  germ,  and  the  principal  support,  could  not  exist.  Man 
would  be  a  solitary  and  ferocious  savage.  The  facility  of 
rearing  children,  and  their  early  independence  on  a  parent's 
care,  would  give  the  strongest  encouragement  to  a  vagrant, 
and  licentious  concubinage,  destructive  of  all  the  virtues, 
and  of  the  dearest  interests  of  human  nature.  Besides,  the 
diseases  of  pregnancy,  as  human  nature  is  now  constituted, 
and  the  pains  and  dangers  of  child-birth,  serve  to  endear 
the  parents  to  each  other,  by  the  weakness,  tenderness,  and 


33 

dependence,  of  the  mother  ;  by  the  honor,  generosity,  and 
sympathy,  of  (he  father  ;  and,  a  hundred  fold,  to  endear 
the  child  to  the  parent.  And  it  is  an  acknowledged  princi- 
ple in  human  nature,  that  (he  troubles  and  con(inual  solici- 
tudes of  nursing,  and  of  education,  together  with  the  neces- 
sary  diseases,  and  hazards  of  infancy,  greatly  augment  the 
strength  of  parental  attachments,  and  lay  the  most  firm,  and 
lasting  foundation  of  the  unions,  subordinations,  and  harmo- 
nious affections,  first,  of  domestic,  and  afterwards,  of  civil 
society.  In  these  pains,  then,  which  have  been  selected  as 
specious  objections  against  the  benignity  of  the  divine  ad- 
ministration of  the  government  of  the  world,  we  find  some  of 
the  principal  sources  of  human  happiness. 

As  to  the  manner  of  terminating  the  present  state  of  ex- 
istence by  death,  the  necessity  of  this  order  arises  out  of 
the  structure  of  our  nature.  Death  is  only  the  way  of  giving 
to  successive  generations,  the  opportunity  and  the  means  of 
existence.  If  this  part  of  the  plan  of  divine  providence 
must  be  changed,  the  whole  order  of  life  must  be  changed 
with  it.  There  could  be  no  such  creature  as  man  in  the 
scale  of  being.  The  institution  of  the  sexes  must  be  de- 
stroyed ;  the  fnultiplication  of  the  species  must  cease.  The 
modes  of  subsistence,  on  the  products  of  the  earth,  which 
can  sustain  only  a  definite  number,  must  be  done  away. 
And,  with  these,  as  the  whole  state  of  human  life,  is  con- 
nected together  by  a  close  unbroken  chain,  must  cease  (he 


34 

operations  of  agiicuHure,  and  the  entire  system  of  the  pre- 
sent occupations  and  pursuits  of  men.  Man,  himself,  would 
be  the  first  to  object  to  such  a  new  order  of  things. — If 
death,  then,  be  a  necessary  part  of  the  human  economy, 
and,  to  man  himself,  it  would  be  undesirable  to  change  it,  if 
it  must  be  accompanied  wilh  so  many  other  changes,  still 
more  unfriendly  to  the  comfort,  and  wishes  of  mankind,  the 
only  question  which  remains  is,  in  what  manner  it  may  be 
best  accomplished,  so  as  to  attain  the  most  useful  ends  of 
its  institution? — If  even  the  whole  of  human  existence  were 
to  be  terminated  by  death,  this  last  act  of  our  being,  so  justly 
formidable  to  our  frailty  and  imperfection,  is  but  a  momenta- 
ry pang,  which  has  been  far  overpaid  by  the  pleasures  of 
life ;  but  if,  as  religion  assures  us,  and  philosophy  renders 
probable,  this  life  is  only  a  period  of  discipline  and  probation 
for  another  state  of  being,  and  death  is  the  avenue  through 
which  we  must  pass  to  it,  certainly  no  method  of  approach- 
ing that  decisive  crisis  could  be  imagined  more  beneficial, 
than  that  which  exists,  of  attaining  every  good  moral  end 
connected  wilh  it : — that  is,  of  making  the  descent  to  the 
grave  easy  to  the  virtuous~of  impressing  a  salutary,  but 
not  oppressive  fear  on  all,  as  a  useful  restraint  from  vice— . 
of  preserving  the  mind,  by  its  extreme  uncertainty,  always 
vigilant  and  attentive  to  the  discharge  of  every  duty,  which 
is  the  best  preparation  for  a  tranquil  exit  from  life — and 
finally,  of  inducing  it  to  hold  its  present  pleasures  in  a  con- 
tinual state  of  obedient  resignation  to  the  will  of  God,  in  the 


34^ 

hope  of  exchanging  them  for  such  as  are  higher  and  more 
perfect. 

To  pursue  the  vindication  of  the  divine  goodness  in  the 
introduction  of  other  physical  evils  into  the  general  adminis- 
tration of  the  government  of  this  world,  would,  to  the  reflect- 
ing reader,  I  trust,  be  wholly  unnecessary.*  Of  the  moral 
evils  which  afflict  the  world,  their  origin,  and  their  cure ; 
and  how  they  are  made  to  illustrate  the  benignity,  and  mer- 
cy of  God  to  mankind,  the  only  true  and  satisfactory  account 
is  to  be  derived  from  revelation-  They  arise  from  an  abuse 
of  the  passions,  and  the  moral  liberty  of  man ;  but  reason^ 
would  be  deplorably  at  a  loss  to  find  her  way,  in  the  maze  of 
doubts,  and  perplexities,  which  attend  their  existence,  in  the 
economy  of  a  benevolent  Deity,  if  revelation  did  not  put  a 
filament  in  her  hand,  or  extend  a  taper  before  her  footsteps, 
to  conduct  her  through  the  labyrinth.  The  elucidation  of 
this  subject  belongs  to  the  second  part  of  this  treatise,  and 
will  receive  all  the  lights,  which  we  can  shed  upon  it  from  the 
holy  scriptures,  under  the  heads  of  the  covenant  of  works^ 
and  the  covenant  of  grace. 

The  only  attribute  which  remains  to  be  considered  is  that 
of  justice.     It  is  an  invariable  determination   in  the  Divine 

*  On  the  physical  evils  incident  to  the  animal  creation,  and  particularly  on  that 
•rder  of  nature,  which  has  destined  the  weaker  part  as  the  prey  of  the  more  pow- 
erful, see  many  judicious  re6ections  in  Dr.  Paley's  natural  theology,  near  the 
•ODcIueioD. 


36 

Mind,  to  render  to  all  his  creatures  according  to  their 
works — to  tlie  virtuous,  reward— -to  the  vicious,  punish- 
ment. This  attribute  we  ascribe  to  God  from  the  dictates 
of  conscience,  and  the  sentiments  of  justice  in  our  own 
breasts. — As  philosophy  delights  to  trace  the  most  compli- 
cated causes  and  effects  to  the  simplest  principles,  justice 
may,  perhaps,  be  considered  as  only  one  expression  of  infi- 
nite benevolence,  in  which,  by  proper  correctives,  restraints, 
and  examples,  the  injurious  consequences  of  the  passions 
may  be  prevented,  and  individuals  deterred  from  seeking 
their  own  enjoyments,  by  the  sacrifice  of  a  greater  good,  in 
violating  the  general  laws  of  order  and  happiness. 

Justice  has,  by  divines,  been  distinguished  into  two 
kinds — distributive,  and  \indictive.  The  former  has  been, 
already'  defined,  and  may  be  applied  for  the  reformation,  as 
well  as  punishment  of  the  offender ;  the  latter  is  conceived  to 
be  the  infliction  of  punishuient  on  vice,  simply  for  its  own 
intrinsic  demerit,  without  any  respect  to  the  reformation  of 
the  individual,  or  any  ulterior  regard  to  a  farther  good  end, 
except  the  general  good  of  the  universe.  Conscience,  in 
the  nature  of  its  reprehensions,  makes  us  perceive  that  guilt 
deserves  such  infliction ;  and  in  its  anticipations,  in  conse- 
quence of  some  atrocious  acts  of  iniquity,  often  leads  the 
criminal  despairingly  to  fear  it.  These  facts  appear  to  indi- 
cate, ;hat  the  distinction  has  a  real  foundation  in  nature.-— 
And  in   these  apprehensions,   probably,   we   discern  the 


37 

source  of  tlioge  bloody  rites  of  superstition,  which,  on  so  ma- 
ny pagan  altars,  have  dishonoured  the  name  of  religion. 

On  this  subject,  a  theological  que<?tion  has  been  raised  of 
great  importance  to  religion — whether,  in  consistency  with 
the  justice  and  holiness  of  the  Divine  Nature,  the  violation 
of  the  moral  law,  by  any  creature,  be  pardonable  without  a 
complete  atonement,  or  a  full  execution  of  its  penalty  ?  If 
justice  be  an  essential  attribute  of  God,  and  its  claims,  in 
consequence  be  as  necessary  as  his  existence,  the  forgive- 
ness  of  an  offender,  can  never  be  a  gratuitous  exercise  of 
mere  mercy.  From  this  principle,  results  an  inference, 
which  is  deeply  laid  at  the  foundation  of  the  christian  reli- 
gion ; — the  necessity  of  complete  atonement  to  the  violated 
law,  and  vindication  of  the  perfections  of  God,  in  the  person 
of  a  mediator,  perfectly  adequate  to  render  this  satisfaction, 
in  order  to  the  exercise  of  mercy  and  forgiveness  to  the  hu- 
man sinner.  The  discussion  of  this  question  also,  belongs 
to  the  second  branch  of  this  treatise,  and  will  find  its  place 
under  the  head  of  the  covenant  of  grace. 

III.  OF  THE  PRINCIPLES  OF  HUMAN  DUTV. 

In  the  science  of  Natural  Religion,  the  first  subject  of  in- 
vestigation is  the  existence  and  perfections  of  Almighty 
God  (he  Creator  ;  whence  we  may  learn  the  duties  of  human 
nature,  as  they  relate  to  the  various  beings  with  whom  we 


38 

are  connected.  Virtue  is  the  subject  of  supreme  concern 
to  mankind.  It  is  the  performance  of  all  our  duties  from 
proper  principles,  and  with  right  affections.  The  detail  of 
these  duties  and  affections,  as  far  as  nature  simply  is  our 
guide,  is  beautifully  pursjied  in  the  two  celebrated  treatises 
of  the  Roman  orator,  concerning  the  divine  nature  and  human 
duty.=^  They  would  be  too  tedious  to  be  detailed  in  the 
present  system.  All  I  shall  aim  at,  in  this  place,  therefore 
will  be  to  reduce  them  under  proper  classes,  in  such  a  manner 
as  to  exhibit  a  distinct  and  systematic  view  of  their  general 
principles,  and  very  briefly  to  present  the  ground  and  rea- 
sons of  each. 

The  duties  of  morality  may  be  divided  in  different  ways, 
either,  according  to  the  principles  from  which  they  spring, 
and  which  govern  their  exercise,  or  according  to  the  objects 
on  which  they  terminate.  The  former  division  was  general- 
ly adopted  by  the  ancient  philosophers,  who  classed  them 
imder  the  heads  of  justice,  prudence,  temperance,  and  for- 
titude. The  latter  is  more  commonly  employed  by  chris- 
tian writers,  who  arrange  them  under  the  heads  of  the  duties 
which  we  owe  to  God,  to  our  fellow  men,  and  to  ourselves. 
Under  the  distribution  of  the  virtues  made  by  the  ancients, 
all  the  practical  duties  of  life  were  embraced  with  all  the 
speculative  questions,  which  philosophers  have  raised  on  the 

^\f.  T.[Cicer©  de  natara  deorum,— et  de  officii*. 


39 

subject  of  duty.  But  the  more  modern  division,  introduced 
chiefly  by  christian  writers,  containing  a  more  obvious,  and 
convenient  distribution,  I  shall  follow  in  our  present  disqui- 
sition. 

OF    OUR    DUTIES    TO    GOD. 

The  duties  which  we  owe  to  God,  and  which  ought  to  oc- 
cupy our  first  attention,  may  be  distributed  into  those  which 
are  external,  and  those  which  are  internal ;  or  into  those 
which  are  general  and  those  which  are  particular.  Our  gen- 
eral duties  embrace  the  whole  compass  of  piety  and  virtue ; 
and  because  they  constitute  the  moral  law  of  the  universe, 
prescribed  by  God  himself,  in  the  very  structure  of  human 
nature,  conformity  to  their  dictates  is  justly  regarded  as  obe- 
dience to  him-  The  particular  duties  terminate  immediate- 
ly on  God  as  their  object,  and  include  both  the  devout  af- 
fections of  the  heart,  and  all  the  natural  and  external  ex- 
pressions of  those  affections. — The  devout  affections  from 
which,  as  from  their  natural  source,  flow  all  the  streams  of 
pious  obedience  to  our  Creator  in  this  life,  are  love,  rever- 
ence, and  resignation.  And,  of  such  profound  and  universal 
obedience,  the  active  spring  is  love ;  which,  to  be  sincere, 
ought  to  be  supreme.  It  is,  perhaps,  belter  expressed  in 
the  sacred  scriptures  than  in  any  other  writina;s ;  Thou 
Shalt  love  the  Lord  thi/  God  with  all  thy  hearty  with  all  thy 
9oul^  with  all  thy  strength,  and  with  all  thy  mind.     This 


40 

affection  in  the  pious  mind,  has  respect  to  all  the  attributes  of 
the  De'iiy  ;  but  chiefly  to  his  moral  perfections,  and  especial- 
ly, to  that  infinite  goodness  on  which  we,  and  all  things  do 
constantly  depend. 

Reverence  is  less  an  active,  than  a  restraining  principle, 
and  is  calculated  to  impose  a  salutary  check  on  the  passions 
of  mankind,  surrounded  and  stimulated,  as  they  constantly 
are,  by  powerful  temptations  to  vice.  This  affection  res- 
pects, principally,  the  infinite  greatness,  wisdom,  power,  and 
holiness  of  God.  It  is  a  principle  essential  to  the  existence 
of  piety  and  virtue,  in  creatures  so  imperfect  and  prone  to 
evil  as  mankind.  From  the  profound  degree  in  which  it 
prevails  in  the  pious  mind,  and  ought  ever  to  prevail  in  the 
human  soul,  it  is  justly  in  the  sacred  scriptures,  styled  the 
fear  of  God,  This  virtue  was  held  in  peculiar  honour  in  the 
early  ages  of  the  Roman  cojnmonwealth,  by  that  wise  peo- 
ple. And  their  most  distinguished  writers  inform  us,  that 
they  regarded  the  fear  of  the  gods,  and  reverence  for  the  sa- 
cred offices  of  religion,  as  the  basis  of  the  public  virtue,  and 
of  the  prosperity  of  the  republic.  How  much  more  truth 
and  importance  should  be  attached  to  this  principle  in  an  en- 
lightened christian  country  ! 

Absolute  resignation  to  the  will  of  God,  and  the  wise  ar» 
rangements  of  his  providence,  I  have  rneniioned,  in  the  last 
place,  as  belonging  to  our  internal  duties.     It  implies  entire 


41 

confidence  in  the  wisdom,  justice,  and  goodness,  of  the  infinite 
Mind  ;  and  a  deep  conviction  of  the  narrowness  of  our  own 
understanding,  and  the  imperfection  of  our  own  views,  as  to 
what  is  good  or  ill  for  us.  Resignation,  resting  on  these 
principles,  begets  not  only  a  grateful  acknowledgment  of  the 
manifold  blessings  of  divine  providence,  but  a  submissive  ac- 
quiescence in  the  will  of  Heaven  under  its  most  aflflictive 
dispensations  ;  believing,  that,  although  we  may  not  be  able 
to  discern  their  ultimate  relations  to  any  beneficent  end, 
either  to  ourselves,  or  others,  yet  are  they  all  reasonable  and 
just,  and  good  ;  and  necessarily  springing  out  of  the  all-wise 
arrangements  of  the  universal  system  under  the  government 
of  God.  This  disposition  of  mind  is  equally  opposed  to  all 
discontent  and  repining  at  the  course  of  providence,  and  to 
all  vain  reliance  upon  its  aids,  while  we  presumptuously  neg- 
lect our  own  duties.  It  tends  to  produce  that  placid  sereni- 
ty of  soul,  so  becoming  the  character  of  resigned  piety,  and 
to  awaken  the  active  and  prudent  exertions,  which  virtue  re- 
quires of  every  good  man,  in  dependence  on  God,  to  improve 
the  felicity  of  his  condition,  and  his  honourable  standing 

in  life. 

V 

OP  OUR  EXTERNAL  DUTIES. 

The  external  duties,  which  we  owe  to  God,  comprise 
every  decent  outward  expression  of  the  pious  sentiments  of 
the  heart.     They  are  all  embraced  under  the  general  name 


of  divme  worship,  for  which,  however,  natural  reason  ha« 
not  prescribed  any  precise  and  definite  form. 

Different  nations,  and  different  sects  of  religion,  have  each 
adopted  a  peculiar  ceremonial.  No  sanctity  ought  to  be  as- 
cribed to  rites,  exclusively  of  the  affections  which  they  are 
desicrned  to  assist ;  or  any  further  than  they  are  proper  ex- 
pressions of  the  devout  dispositions  of  the  soul.  But  all 
rites  deserve  to  be  regarded  with  re^^pect,  which  custom  has 
sanctified  by  their  sacred  use,  among  any  people,  or  so  asso- 
ciated with  their  religious  ideas,  as  to  be  to  them  the  most  se- 
rious, and  affecting  expression  of  their  devotional  exercises. 
In  considering  the  general  question,  of  the  utility  of  rites 
and  forms  in  religion,  and  how  they  may  be  applied  in  the 
most  effectual  manner  to  answer  the  design  of  impressing  the 
heait  in  divine  worship,  and  aiding  its  pious  emotions,  reason 
will  decide,  that  the  ceremonial  ought  to  be,  neither  too  sim- 
ple, nor  too  multifarious  and  splendid..  The  mass  of  man- 
kind are  ao  much  governed  by  sensible  impressions,  as  sel- 
dom to  be  able  to  v^upport,  with  proper  fervency,  a  religion 
which  aims  to  be  wholly  intellectual,  and  scorns  any  alliance 
with  the  senses  ;  on  the  other  hand,  the  senses  are  apt  to  be 
so  much  amused  with  a  ceremonial  too  splendid,  or  multifa- 
rious, as,  in  time,  to  exclude  the  heart  and  understanding 
from  divine  worship,  and  lo  substitute,  in  its  room,  only  a  fri; 
volous  superstition. 


43 

The  essential  parts  of  a  rational  worship,  in  whatever  cer- 
emonies it  is  clolhed,  are  adoration,  thanksgiving,  confes^jion, 
and  prayer.  Adoration,  relates  to  the  infinite  perfections  of 
the  Deity,  for  which  we  ought,  in  our  devotions,  to  feel,  and 
express  the  highest  veneration.  Thanksgiving,  is  employed 
in  giving  utterance  to  our  grateful  acknowledgnjents,  of  those 
innumerable  mercies,  which  we  continually  receive  from  him. 
Confession,  respects  our  manifoUl  offences  and  omissions  of 
duty.  And  finally,  prayer  regards  those  mercies  of  which 
we  have  need,  and  which  we  ought  humbly  and  submissive- 
Jy  to  ask  of  him,  either  for  ourselves,  or  for  others. 

These  duties,  being  continually  explained  and  inculcated 
in  the  public  institutions  of  religion,  will  not  require  any  fur- 
ther illustration  in  this  place.  Two  objections,  however, 
have  been  so  plausibly  urged  against  the  duty  of  divine  wor- 
ship in  general,  that  they  ought  not,  perhaps,  to  pass  with- 
out a  particular  answer. 

It  is  said,  in  the  first  place,  to  convey  an  unworthy  idea  of 
the  Supreme  Deity,  to  suppose  that  he  derives  pleasure  from 
hearing  his  perfections  repeated,  or  his  praises  extolled  by 
mortals,  in  acts  of  adoration,  as  if,  by  such  adulatory  ad- 
dresses, his  displeasure  could  be  averted,  or  his  mercy  brib- 
ed.— It  is  equally  unworthy  the  Divine  Majesty,  it  is  alleg- 
ed, to  believe  that  humiliating  confessions  from  such  imper- 
fect beings  can  be  acceptable  to  him  who  already  knows  and 


44 

pities  all  their  errors  ;  or  that  he  can  requhe  of  them  formal 
acknowledgments  for  the  acts  of  beneficence,  which  it  is 
agreeable  to  his  nature  to  bestow,  and  for  which  no  acknowl- 
edgments can  make  any  requital. 

To  these  unfair  representations,  it  may  be  replied  with 
justice,  that  it  is  an  essential  law  of  our  nature,  that  all  high 
sentiments,  or  strong  afifections,  naturally  seek  for  some 
means  by  which  to  express  themselves.  If  therefore,  we 
feel,  as  virtuous,  and  pious  men  ought  to  feel,  towards  the 
Author  of  our  being,  to  check  this  dutiful  expression  of  our 
emotions,  would  be  to  stifle  the  most  reasonable  impulses  of 
the  heart ;  and  not  to  feel  them,  would  be  the  proof  of  a 
cold  and  corrupted  soul. 

I  add,  that  the  most  natural,  and  laudable  afifections,  when 
they  are  suppressed,  and  entirely  locked  up  within  the  heart, 
necessarily  languish,  and,  at  length,  cease  to  be  perceived. 
The  strong,  and  ingenuous  emotions  of  unfeigned  piety 
will  ever  seek  for  some  mode  of  external  expression,  and  the 
repeated  exp^'^^s'on  of  them  in  the  acts  of  a  visible  worship, 
will  reciprocally,  give  strength  to  the  inward  temper  from 
which  they  flow.  An  external  worship,  then,  is  founded  on 
principles  of  the  soundest  reason,  and  most  conformable  to 
the  laws  of  our  moral  nature.  It  cannot,  by  any  person,  who 
thinks  wisely  of  the  Deity,  be  supposed  to  be  enjoined  for 
any  gratification  which  he  receives  from  the  praises,  or  pros- 


45 

(rations  of  a  being  so  imperfect  as  man.  It  can  be  demand- 
ed only  from  that  infinite  wisdom  and  benevolence  which  re- 
quires our  worship  for  its  own  essential  rectitude,  and  for  its 
beneficial  influence  in  cultivating  the  affections  and  habits  of 
pietj,  for  which  it  is  so  admirably  fitted.  For  adoration  of 
the  divine  perfections,  while  it  impresses  the  pious  mind 
with  an  awful  reverence  of  the  Deity,  tends  to  elevate  tlie 
tone  of  its  moral  feelings,  and  to  assimilate  them  to  the  pu- 
rity of  the  object  of  its  worship. — The  grateful  recollection 
of  the  divine  mercies,  in  the  immediate  presence  of  God, 
serves  to  confirm  the  affectionate  purposes  of  duty,  and  obe~ 
dience  to  him. — On  the  contrary,  the  penitent  confession  of 
the  sins  and  errors  of  life,  helps  to  arm  the  soul  against  its 
own  weakness,  and  its  impure  passions.  And  finally,  the 
supplications  which  we  address  to  the  Father  of  mercies  for 
the  blessings  which  we  need,  either  for  the  present  life,  or  in 
the  hope  of  a  future  and  higher  existence,  remind  us,  contin- 
ually, of  our  dependence  on  him  for  all  things  ;  and  awaken, 
by  that  remembrance,  the  profoundest  sentiments  of  piety. 
Can  there  be  more  proper  means  of  cultivating  in  human 
nature  the  best  and  noblest  affections  of  the  heart? 

The  second  objection,  which  perhaps,  is  more  plausible, 
and  seems  supported  on  stronger  metaphysical  ground,  is  di- 
rected against  the  efficacy,  and  consequently  the  utility  of 
prayer,  employed  as  a  mean  of  obtaining  the  divine  favour, 
either  in  our  public,  or  private  devotions,— The  order  of 


46 

the  universe,  and  the  eternal  train  of  causes  and  effects, 
have,  froQi  tne  beginning,  been  fixed  b^'  intini  e  wisuom. 
And  the  laws  which  have  been  established  by  divine  wis- 
dom are  as  unchangeable  as  those  which  have  been  ascribed 
to  necessity,  or  fate. — ^^'hy,  then,  it  is  demanded,  should 
we  pray  ?  If  pre-established  causes  naturally  co-operate  to 
the  production  of  the  event,  it  must  take  place  independent- 
ly of  our  prayers.  If  otherwise,  we  pray  in  vain.  The 
breath  of  mortals  cannot  change  the  eternal  order  of  things. 
— This  is  the  objection  placed  in  the  strongest  point  of  light. 
— To  obviate  it,  let  it  be  observed  that  prayer  can  have  on- 
ly two  ends  in  view  ;  either  to  cultivate  the  moral  qualities 
of  the  heart,  and  thereby  obtain  those  spiritual  blessings 
which,  in  the  order  of  providence  are  connected  with  them, 
or  to  procure  those  external,  and  temporal  goods  which  we 
solicit  in  prayer.  To  obtain  the  former,  we  have  seen  that 
prayer,  with  every  other  part  of  divine  worship,  possesses 
an  obvious  and  acknowledged  influence.  The  stress  of  the 
objection,  therefore,  presses  on  the  latter;  but  admits  of  this 
simple  and  unconstrained  solution. — From  the  superiority  of 
intellect  to  matter,  and  of  the  moral  to  the  physical  order  of 
things,  there  is  the  highest  probability  that  the  latter  has 
been  created  wholly  in  subserviency  to  the  former.  If  this 
principle  be  admitted,  will  it  not  result  as  a  natural  conse- 
quence that  the  Creator  may  have  so  adjusted  the  physical 
to  the  moral  order  of  things,  that,  foreseeing  the  sincere,  and 
reasonable   desires  of    good  men,  who   are    his    children, 


4r 

the  disposilion  of  causes,  anil  the  train  of  events  shall  be 
8uch  as,  at  the  proper  time,  and  in  the  way  most  agrteable 
to  his  inGnite  wisdom,  to  correspond  with  their  prayers,  if  it 
be  his  will  to  bestow  the  blessing  ?  For  so  perfect  is  his  fore- 
knowledge, that,  with  regurd  lo  his  infinite  view,  no  event 
may  be  considered  as  future,  but  all  things  are  immetliately 
present. 

If  this  be  regarded  as?  an  hypothetical  answer  to  the  ob- 
jection, there  are,  at  least,  innjiiaerable  occasions  on  which 
the  same  answer,  derived  from  the  relation  of  the  two  worlds, 
appears  to  be  founded  on  the  plain  and  obvious  course  of 
nature.  How  often  do  the  events  of  the  world  manifestly 
depend  upon  njoral  springs  ?  How  often  do  we  see  the  for- 
tunes of  imlividuals  greatly  influenced  by  their  moral  charac- 
ter ?  And  the  univer;^al  voice  of  history,  has  ahnost  raised  it 
into  a  maxim,  that  the  prosperity  of  nations  is  intimately  link- 
ed with  their  virtue,  and  their  decline  as  certainly  associated 
with  the  corruption  of  morals,  and  the  disorder  of  the  public 
manners.  When  we  reflect,  therefore,  how  much  public  and 
individual  manners  are  affected  by  the  healthful  stale  of  reli- 
gion, and  how  much  this  is  connected  with  the  purity  of  the 
public  worship,  and  the  sincerity  of  private  devotion,  we  can 
hardly  avoid  the  conclusion,  that  on  many  events,  prayers 
•ffered  up  to  almighty  God,  with  humility,  fervency  and  per- 
leverance,  have  an  influence  not  less  powerful,  and  often, 
much  more  successful  than  any  other  <iecond  cause.    So  that 


48 

whether  we  regard  the  wise  and  eternal  arrangements  of  pro- 
vidence, or  fhe  known  and  fixed  order  of  natural  and  moral 
events,  the  result  still  recurs  that  prayer,  far  from  being  an 
unreasonable  and  hopeless  service,  not  only  has  a  natural 
and  important  influence  on  human  events,  but  may  have,  as 
revelation  assures  us  it  has,  a  positive  and  divine  efficacy. 
And,  indeed,  can  any  institution  be  more  just  and  equitable 
in  itself,  than  that  God  should  make  the  conferring  of  the 
blessings  which  we  ask  in  prayer,  to  depend  upon  the  exist- 
ence and  growth  of  those  pious  dispositions  which  are  best 
cultivated  by  these  devotional  exercises  ? 

OP  OUR  DUTIES  TO  OUR  FELLOW-MEN. 

These  duties  include  a  greater  compass  and  variety  than 
those  which  terminate  immediately  upon  God.  They  respect 
the  infinitely  various  relations  which  subsist  among  mankind, 
and  necessarily  occupy  much  the  largest  portion  of  life. 
There  is  scarcely  one  of  our  actions  which  does  not  affect 
some  of  these  relations.  From  the  general  information  which 
prevails  in  a  country  like  ours,  continually  enlightened  by  the 
pulpit,  on  the  practical  duties  of  society,  it  would  be  wholly 
unnecessary  to  go  into  an  extensive  detail  of  our  social  offi- 
ces. Sufficient,  I  presume,  it  will  be  to  suggest  a  few  sub- 
divisions under  which  they  may  all  be  classed. 


49 

The  first  and  most  general  division  of  our  duties  may  be 
into  those  which  are  negative,  consisting  merely  in  abstinence 
from  injury,  or  the  infliction  of  unnecessary  pain — and  such 
as  are  positive,  being  employed  chiefly  in  doing  actual  good. 
Many  subordinate  classes  of  practical  duty  may  admit  of  a 
similar  division.  But  when  we  speak  of  duty  in  general,  it 
seems  peculiarly  requisite,  on  account  of  fhe  many  and  strong 
passions  in  human  nature,  which  so  often  impel  men  to  mutu- 
al injury. 

The  positive  duties  which  we  owe  to  our  fellow-men  may 
all  be  comprised  under  the  heads  of  justice  and  beneficence. 
But  though  so  simple  in  their  principles,  they  are  in  prac- 
tice, almost  infinitely  diversified  in  their  details,  according 
to  the  relations  which  we  sustain  to  our  country — to  our 
family — to  our  vicinity — to  our  friends — to  the  objects  of 
our  charity — to  those  who  are  invested  with  authority  over 
us — or  who  are  subjected  to  our  controul — or,  finally,  ac- 
cording to  our  philanthropic  relations  to  mankind.  On  these 
duties  volumes  have  been  written ;  libraries  have  been  fill- 
ed ;  and  still  they  are  subjects  which  constantly  demand  our 
attention,  and  on  which  we  can  never  cease  to  be  active  and 
to  learn. 


^# 


OS-  OUR  DUTIES  TO  OURSELVES. 

This  class  of  duties  is  as  real,  and  in  many  respects,  as  im- 
porfant,  as  those  which  we  owe  to  God,  or  to  our  neigh- 
bour. On  these,  as  on  the  last,  I  shall  content  myself  with 
simply  enumeraling  the  sub-divisions,  under  which  all  the 
particular  details  may  be  embraced.  They  relate  to  self- 
preservation— to  self-enjoyment — to  self-interest — and  to 
the  general  cr.Itivation  and  improvement  of  our  nature. 

Self-preservation  includes  the  care  of  health,  of  liberty, 
and  life.  He  is  culpable  who  neglects  his  health,  which 
ought  to  be  diligently  preserved  only  for  the  useful  and  vir- 
tuous purposes  of  living.  He  is,  perhaps,  more  culpable^ 
who  barters  his  liberty  for  any  pretended  convenience,  or 
conjpensalion,  or  who  does  not  strenuously  defend,  when  it 
is  attacked,  this  most  noble,  and  precious  prerogative  of  our 
nature.  And  voluntarily  to  sacrifice  life,  or  unnecessarily  to 
hazard  it,  in  a  cause  that  is  not  worthy  the  rational  and  moral 
nature  of  man,  if  it  does  not  flow  from  insanity,  is  an  evidence 
of  a  mind  precipitate,  and  foolish,  and  utterly  void  of  virtu- 
ous  fortitude. 

A  rational  self-enjoyment,  in  the  next  place,  every  good 
man  is  not  only  permitted,  but  required,  to  cultivate,  in  order 
that  he  may  be  rendered  more  grateful  to  his  Creator,  and 


51 

correspond  more  efTecfually  with  Lis  beneficent  design  in  our 
creation,  by  prudently  and  temperately  using  the  blessings 
of  his  providence.  This  is  evidently  conformable  to  the 
purpose  of  our  Creator,  and  harmonizes  with  the  apparent 
structure  and  order  of  our  nature.  But  in  using  this  privi- 
lege, peculiar  caution  is  requisite,  lest  the  force  of  self-love 
should  urge  indulgence  beyond  that  restricted  and  frugal 
boundary,  at  which  prudence  and  virtue  should  arrest  it. 

Self-interest,  the  cultivation  of  which  belongs  io  this  class 
of  our  duties,  relates  to  necessary  provision,  and  comfortable 
accommodation,  which  no  good  man,  under  any  pretended 
idea  cf  benevolence,  or  public  spirit,  ought  to  neglect ;  and, 
in  a  more  extended  view,  it  relates  to  the  fevoiir  of  God,  and 
the  felicity  which  reason  teaches  us  to  hope  ibr  in  a  future 
world,  which  should  be  the  first  concern  to  every  truly  wise 
man  in  the  present. 

The  general  cultivation  and  improvement  of  our  nature, 
which  I  enumerated  last  amozig  the  duties,  that  we  owe  to 
ourselves,  has  for  its  objects,  our  bodily  powers,  the  facul- 
ties of  the  mind,  and  the  affections  of  the  heart.  The  most 
important  trust,  which  our  Almighty  Creator  has  committed 
to  man  as  a  moral  and  accountable  being,  is  himself.  And 
the  first  obligation,  which  such  a  gift  imposes,  is  to  carry  his 
nature  to  the  ultimate  perfection  of  which  it  is  susceptible, 
in  our  circumstances. 


58 

Such  is  a  very  brief  analysis  of  the  general  system  of  our 
dut  69,  but  suflScient,  pei  haps,  to  present,  to  a  reflecting 
mind,  a  key  to  its  minute  and  particular  details. 

I  do  not  say  that  all  men  have  been  able  to  deduce  the  sys- 
tem of  their  duties  in  a  regular  and  scientific  train  of  reason- 
ing ;  nor  that  they  are  not  much  more  clearly  discerned,  un- 
der the  bright  illumination  of  the  gospel,  than  they  were,  by 
the  wisest  men,  under  the  dim  twilight  of  paganism  ;  but  such 
they  appear  to  be,  when  faithfully  and  dispassionately  traced 
out,  under  the  guidance  simply  of  a  purified  reason. 

OF  NATURAL  RELIGION,    AS    IT    RESPECTS,  IN  THE  FOURTH 

PLACE,   THE    MOTIVES   OF  DUTY,  DRAWN   FROxM   THE 

PROBAE^E  HOPES  OF    A  FUTURE  EXISTENCE. 

After  stating  the  general  principles  of  human  duty,  as  it  is 
prescribed  by  the  religion  of  nature,  it  is  proper,  in  the  last 
place  to  turn  our  attention  to  the  motives,  from  the  same 
source,  by  which  it  is  enforced.  Those  drawn  from  a  ra- 
tional consideration  of  our  uiteresfs,  pleasure,  and  happiness, 
in  the  p  esent  life,  wili  be  the  same  in  natural,  as  in  revealed 
religion  Revelation  presents  us  with  the  highest  possible 
inducenients,  which  can  be  derived  from  the  hopes  and  fears 
of  futu  ity,  exhibited  in  the  clearest  and  the  strongest  light. 
Natural  reason,  likewise,  presents  to  mankind  its  motives 
drawn  fiom  the  same  source,  and,  though  far  from  being  eo 


S3 

dear  and  powerful  as  those  which  address  us  from  the  reveal- 
ed  word  of  God,  yet  well  deserving  our  consideration,  as 
those  alone  to  which  the  great  majority  of  mankind  can  have 
recourse  ;  and  which  shew  ns  how  far  human  reason,  in  its 
most  cullivafed  state,  may  lead  us,  in  the  investigation  of 
this  most  important  doctrine,  unaided  by  any  direct  and  im- 
mediate light  from  Heaven.  For  this  purpose,  F  shall  propose 
to  you  the  chief  of  those  general  arguments,  on  which  the  phi- 
losopher professes  to  found  his  belief,  or  rather  his  hope  of 
the  immortality  of  the  soul.  The  authority  of  the  law  of  vir- 
tue would  be  very  feebly  felt  by  the  greater  part  of  mankind, 
if  the  expectations,  or  the  apprehensions  of  existing  after  this 
life,  were  not  shewn  to  rest  on,  at  least,  probable  foundations. 
We  must  confess,  however,  that  probability  is  the  utmost 
which  reason,  paying  all  due  deference  to  its  powers,  has 
been  able  to  attain  on  this  interesting  subject.  We  must 
look  for  that  clear  and  full  persuasion,  on  which  the  soul  can 
repose  with  assurance  in  the  midst  of  affliction,  and  at  the 
approach  of  death,  only  in  the  sacred  scriptures.  But  the 
human  mind,  in  its  anxious  longings  after  immortality,  is  in- 
clined to  make  the  most  of  thos^e  feeble  lights,  which  reason 
holds  out  to  encourage  its  hopes.  And  Cicero  could  only 
say,  but  he  says  it  with  the  enthusiasm  natural  to  a  virtuous 
mind,  that  '*  if  he  were  deceived  in  cherishing  the  hope  of 
an  immortal  existence,  he  wished  not  to  be  awakened  from  so 
agreeable  a  delusion."  And  Socrates,  in  his  last  conversa- 
tion with  his  friends,  just  before  drinking  the  fatal  hemlock^ 


64 

thus  took  his  leave  of  them, — *'  You  go  to  your  ordiuapy  oc- 
cupations, I  to  my  fate  :  which  of  us  shall  enjoy  the  happier 
lot  is  known  only  to  the  Gods." 

The  Christian  religion  has  produced  such  a  deep  and  gen- 
eral persuasion  of  this  doctrine,  in  the  minds  of  its  disciples, 
as  has  induced  a  common  belief,  that  the  evidence  which 
reason  yields  in  its  support,  is  much  more  direct  and  clear, 
than,  on  the  most  fair  and  candid  examination,  it  will  be  found 
to  be.  There  are,  however,  such  strong  and  rational  prob- 
abilifics,  drawn  both  from  the  physical  and  moral  order  of 
things,  as  merit  the  most  serious  attention  of  the  philosopher. 
Some  of  the  principal  moral  reasons,  which  claim  the  assent 
of  an  enlightened  pagan  to  this  truth,  I  proceed  shortly  io 
lay  before  you. 

In  the  first  place,  then,  if  the  present  were  the  only  state 
of  human  existence,  the  designs  of  the  Creator,  in  the  forma- 
tion of  man,  would  seem  to  be  in  a  great  measure  frustrated  ; 
at  least,  they  would  not  be  conformable  to  the  usual  opera- 
tions of  his  wisdom.  We  would  behold  the  noblest  being 
with  which  we  are  acquainted,  just  begin  to  evolve  faculties, 
which  are  never  permitted  to  arrive  at  their  full  vigor,  or  to 
display  their  full  beauty.  Man  is  evidently  possessed  of  tal- 
ents, which  are  progressive  to  an  indefinite  degree  of  im- 
provement. Yet  no  individual  has  ever  carried  any  one  tal- 
ent, and  much  less,  the  whole  system  of  his  natural  powers, 


(o  ilie  highest  perfection  of  which  they  are  susceptible  :  and 
lesa  slill,  has  the  whole  race  approached  near  to  that  ultimate 
point  in  the  jcale  of  being,  to  which  they  are  manifestly  ca- 
pable of  arriving,  and  appear,  in  some  period  of  their  pro^ 
gress,  to  be  destined.  To  arrest  them,  then,  in  the  midst, 
or  rather  in  the  commencement  of  their  career,  when  they 
are  only  beginning  to  display  those  capacities,  which  they 
shall  never  fully  unfold,  seems  hardly  conformable  to  cur 
most  reasonable  ide^s  of  divine  benevolence  and  wisdom. 
All  other  things,  which  come  under  our  cognizance  in  this 
world,  have  a  point  of  maturity  that  is  the  highest  of  which 
their  natures  are  susceptible.  Arriving  at  this,  tiiey  begin 
gradually  to  decay.  Other  animals  increa'ie  to  acerlain  de- 
gree of  strength,  and  sagacity,  whii:h  is,  evidentiV,  the  ulti- 
mate limit  within  which  their  natures  are  bountted.  Their 
several  species  appear  to  be  equal  in  all  ages.  There  is  a 
point,  below  which,  they  hardly  ever  fall,  and  above  which 
they  cannot  rise.  Far  otherwise  is  it  with  man.  The  greut- 
•est  portion  of  his  powers  would  be  lost,  and  he  would  ^eeni 
to  have  been  made  in  vain,  if  there  were  not  another  stuff;  of 
being,  in  which  they  may  unfold  themsehe?,  and  attain^liat 
perfection  of  which  they  are  capable.  Hardly  can  we  con- 
ceive it  to  be  consistent  with  the  wisdom  and  goodness?  of 
God,  to  bestow  on  man  so  many  incipient  talents,  only  to  be 
checked,  or  cut  o(F,  in  the  very  commencement  of  their  pro- 
gress— germs  which  are  never  suffered  to  come  to  their  i.:»a- 
turit  J.     Moral  and  religious  sentiments,  in  particular,  do  not 


56 

8CCD1  {0  have  any  reasonable  objecf,  if  we  are  <o  regard  our- 
selves, as  being  only  particles  of  animated  dust,  destined  to 
perish  almost  as  soon  as  we  begin  to  exist ;  and  have  not  be- 
yond this  life,  the  hope  of  some  nearer  approach  to  the  deity, 
and  the  expectation  of  some  reward  from  him,  which  shall 
depend  on  the  pnrity  of  our  pious  affections,  and  the  integri- 
ty of  our  virtuous  conduct  in  this  life.  The  sacrifices  of  vir- 
tue, would  be  without  remuneration  ;  and  the  noblest  dispo- 
sitions of  the  heart,  cultivated  with  the  most  devout  care, 
would  be  like  incense  burnt  and  scattered  by  the  winds,  be- 
fore a  being  who  regards  it  not. 

Another  argument  of  no  inconsiderable  weight,  in  the  es- 
timation of  the  rational  philosopher,  for  the  doctrine  of  im- 
mortality, is  derived  from  the  general  belief  of  mankind. 
Such  a  universal  concurrence  of  opinion,  indicates  some  ori- 
ginal principle  of  nature  on  which  it  rests  ;  and  which  can  be 
only  the  operation  of  God  himself  in  the  human  heart.  It 
has  formed  an  article  of  belief  in  all  religions.  Ii  has  been 
laid  at  the  foundation  of  all  the  political  institutions  of  anti- 
quity, as  well  as  of  modern  ages.  And  no  nation  has  been 
discovered  so  rude,  and  savage,  who  has  not,  along  with  the 
idea  of  God,  united  that  also,  of  the  future  existence  of  the 
soul. — Some  philosophers  ascribe  this  interesting  phenome- 
non to  imitation,  and  the  influence  of  education.  W  here 
principles  have  already  a  foundation  in  nature,  education  and 
imitation  readily  concur  to  strengthen  their  influence.     But 


57 

when  they  are  entirely  arbitrary,  although  one  principle  may 
fake  root,  and  be  propagated  in  one  nation,  and  a  different 
one  in  another,  yet,  when  have  we  seen  such  uniformity  in 
education,  among  all  the  inhabitants  of  the  globe,  if  it  has  not 
been  employed  to  cultivate  some  natural  principle  ? 

It  has  been  boldly  asserted,  but  I  conceive  with  little 
plausibility,  that  the  doctrine  has  been  introduced,  and  ob- 
tained credit  in  the  world,  by  the  artifice  of  priests,  in  order 
to  establish  their  authority  over  the  multitude,  by  the  all 
subduing  charm  of  superstition  ;  or,  by  the  craft  of  politicians, 
and  legislators,  who  found  no  better  way  to  render  their  sub- 
jects obedient,  and  to  confirm  the  authority  of  their  laws, 
than  by  the  power  of  religious  fear. — In  answer  to  insinua- 
tions of  this  kind,  we  may  well  ask,  when  had  a  few  priests 
or  politicians  more  cunning  than  all  the  rest  of  mankind  ? 
But,  if  it  be  true,  that  the  order  of  human  society  cannot  be 
perfectly  maintained  without  the  belief  of  a  state  of  future 
retribution,  and  that,  therefore,  the  whole  force  of  political 
power  and  intrigue  has  been  employed  to  establish  this  sen- 
timent among  the  people,  this  is  surely  an  argument  of  no  in- 
considerable weight  for  the  truth  of  the  doctrine.  Other- 
wise, man  must  have  been  formed  under  the  hard  necessity 
of  being  continually  deceived,  in  order  to  promote  his  best 
interests ;  a  consequence  which  we  ought  not  to  impute  to 
the  infinite  wisdom  and  goodness  of  the  Crrafor. 


The  universality  of  this  belief,  therefore,  ought,  I  presuffie^ 
to  be  ascribed  to  an  original  sentiment  of  our  nature ;  or,  at 
least,  to  a  conclusion  that  so  necessarily  obtrudes  itself  upon 
the  mind,  from  the  united  reflections  of  reason  and  sentiments 
of  conscience,  that  it  may  justly  be  classed  along  with  our 
instinctive  feelings. 

It  is  certainly  no  proper  or  sufficient  objection  against  the 
universality  of  this  opinion,  and  consequently,  the  truth  of 
this  principle  connected  with  it,  that  there  have  existed  phi-^ 
losophers  who  have  denied  il ;  or  whole  nations  who  have 
blended  it  with  many  superstitious  notions. — A  minute  phi- 
losophy, attempting  to  plunge  too  far  into  the  subtleties  of 
speculation,  is,  often  much  less  to  be  depended  on  as  a  guide 
to  truth,  than  the  simplest  dictates  of  the  uncultivated  under- 
standing. It  is  not  surprising  then,  if  a  few  philosophers,  in 
the  pride  of  speculation,  or  the  vanity  of  affected  singularity, 
should  have  added  to  their  other  contradictions  of  the  com- 
mon opinions  of  mankind,  the  denial  of  a  future  existence  and 
the  immortality  of  the  soul. 

The  certainty  of  truth  ought  not  to  be  questioned,  or  deni- 
ed on  account  of  the  errors  which  either  speculation  or  su- 
perstition has  mingled  with  it.  Nature,  on  many  subjects^ 
particularly  on  those  relating  to  morals  and  duty,  points  to 
the  general  principle,  or  gives  the  general  impression  of  the 
trutfaj  but  leaves  it  to  reason,  experience  and  reflection,  te 


give  it  its  perfect  shape  and  form.  This  each  man  will  da^ 
with  more  or  less  accuracy  and  precision  of  idea,  according  to 
the  strength  of  his  intellectual  faculties,  united  with  his  vir- 
tue, or  the  prepossessions  of  his  education.— The  argument^, 
therefore,  for  the  immortality  of  the  soul,  drawn  from  the 
natural  feelings  and  expectations  of  mankind,  remains  strong, 
notwithstanding  the  gloomy  speculations  of  sceptical  philos- 
ophers, and  the  absurd  admixtures  of  superstitious  nation!?. 

Another  of  the  moral  causes  on  which  natural  reason 
founds  its  hope  and  belief  of  this  doctrine,  is  the  strong  desire 
of  good  men,  and  the  apprehensions  of  the  vicious ;  which 
are  commonly  found  to  increase  in  proportion  as  they  appear 
to  be  approaching  to  the  period  of  their  earthly  existence. 
The  natural  desire  of  immortality  is,  certainly,  one  of  the 
strongest  affections  of  the  human  heart,  at  least,  till  the  do- 
minion of  vicious  passions  have  made  it  the  interest  of  the 
guilty  to  fear  it.  It  is  the  most  powerful  motive  of  virtue, 
and  the  greatest  consolation  of  good  men,  under  the  various 
trials  of  life.  And  on  the  violent  and  criminal  passions  of 
the  vicious  there  is  hardly  any  restraint  "'so  effectual,  as  the 
apprehension  of  a  future  existence,  and  of  the  retribution 
with  which  conscience  always  accompanies  that  fear.  The 
hopes  and  fears  of  human  nature,  therefore,  both  concur  to 
strengthen  the  probability  of  a  renewed  existence  after  this 
life.  If  this  lively  anticipation  of  a  future  being,  in  a  happi* 
e"r  state,  be  implanted  in  the  hearts  of  good  men,  by  God 


60 

himself,  can  we  believe  that  his  infinite  benignity  hath  cre- 
ated in  them  desires  onlj  to  disappoint  them,  and  inspire 
them  with  hopes  onl/  to  tantalize  them  ? 

The  same  conchision  is  confirmed  by  the  apprehensions 
of  wicked  men,  especially  under  the  stroke  of  any  great  ca- 
lamity, or  at  the  approach  of  death.     The  conscience  of 
guilt  anticipates  a  retribution  far  exceeding  any  sufferings  to 
which  it  can  be  subjected  in  the  present  life.     And  very  few 
are  the  cases  in  which  this  salutary  fear  can  be  entirely  ex- 
tinguished by  the  hardihood  of  vice,  or  the  perversion  of 
a  misguided  education.     And,  certainly,  it  would  not  be 
serving  the  interests  of  society,  or  of  human  nature,  to  attempt 
to  remove  from  the  minds  of  men,  those  useful  restraints 
which  the  wisdom  of  divine  providence  hath  thought  proper 
to  impose  upon  the  passions,  which  would,  otherwise,  be 
dangerous  to  the  peace  of  society,  and  to  the  best  interests 
of  virtue. — This  argument  is  not  a  little  strengthened  by  the 
acknowledged  eflfect  which  the  disbelief  of  the  immortality 
of  the  soul,  and  the  docii  ine  of  a  future  life  would  have  up- 
on the  state  of  public  morals.     The  good  could  hardly  find 
in  the  general  order,  and  distribution  of  providence,   in  the 
present  state,  sufficient  motives  to  sustain  them  in  the  con- 
tinual conflicts  ;  or  to  encourage  the  incessant  efforts  of  vir- 
tue, which  are  often  painful  and  laborious,  and  not  rarely  ex- 
posed to  extraordinary  hazards.      If  the  passions  of  men 
were  freed  from  the  salutary  restraints  of  religious  fear,  and 


61 

secrecy  were,  as  it  then  would  be,  the  effectual  protection  of 
crimes,  the  greatest  infelicity  and  disorder  would  reign  in 
society.  Some  of  the  most  eminent  of  the  Roman  writers  as- 
cribe the  extreme  corruption  of  the  Roman  manners,  towards 
the  period  of  the  republic,  and  under  the  empire  in  its  first 
ages,  to  the  introduction  and  prevalence  of  the  epicurean 
philosophy,  of  which  the  final  extinction  of  the  soul  at  death 
was  one  of  the  leading  principles.  If  these  reflections  be 
well  founded,  and  the  doctrine  of  immortality,  and  religious 
reverence,  which  generally  accompanies  it,  be  necessary  to 
the  peace  and  order  of  human  society,  and  the  prosperity 
of  nations,  the  truth  of  the  principle  is  strongly  implied  in 
this  salutary  eflfect.  It  is  unreasonable  to  believe  that  God 
has  formed  human  nature  in  such  a  manner  as  to  require  that 
it  should  be  governed  by  falsehood.  We  ought  to  presume, 
on  the  contrary,  that  all  the  plans  of  infinite  wisdom  do  so 
correspond,  that  virtue,  and  happiness,  which  appear  to  be 
the  end  of  the  whole,  must  be  established  by  truth  alone. 

There  appears,  in  the  next  place,  such  a  promiscuous  and 
unequal  distribution  of  good  and  evil  in  the  present  state,  as 
gives  strong  ground  to  expect,  in  some  future  period  of  our 
existence,  a  partition  of  the  blessings  and  inflictions  of  divine 
providence  more  conformable  to  our  ideas  of  the  goodness 
and  equity  of  the  Supreme  Ruler  of  the  universe.  If  this 
world  were  designed  to  exhibit  the  ultimate  plan  of  his  moral 
government,  it  would  be  a  most  natural  expectation  to  find 


02 

Virlue  placed  in  sucb  favourable  circumstances,  that  tranquil 
Htj,  comfort,  and  honour,  should,  at  least,  be  within  the  com- 
pass of  its  reasonable  efforts  ;  and  vice  be  subjected  to  de- 
privations, and  inflictions,  that  should  bear  some  proportion 
to  the  disorders  and  enormities  occasioned  by  it.  Contrary, 
however,  to  that  order  of  things  which  all  our  ideas  of  reason, 
and  of  the  goodness  and  equity  of  Ihe  Deity  would  suggest, 
we  often  behold  virtue  suffering  under  deep  and  unavoidable 
afflictions  ;  and  those  afflictions,  not  unfrequently,  induced 
immediately  by  a  6rm  and  steady  adherence  to  truth  and 
duty  ;  while  vice  triumphs  in  the  rewarels  of  fraud  and  treach- 
ery. Many  writers,  professing  to  put  external  circumstances 
wholly  out  of  the  (juestion,  have  maintained,  that  happiness, 
depending  entirely  upon  the  internal  state  of  the  mind,  is 
more  equally  distributed,  according  to  the  virtue  and  wisdom 
of  individuals,  than  appears  to  be  implied  in  the  objection : 
and  Diogenes,  in  his  tub,  it  is  said,  was  really  no  less  happy 
than  Alexander  on  his  throne.  This  vindication  of  the  per- 
fect equity  of  the  present  arrangements  of  providence,  sup- 
posing them  to  be  final,  is  rather  plausible  than  just.  A  few 
men  by  religious  enthusiasm,  or  philosophic  speculation,  may 
reduce,  or  exalt  their  feelings  to  almost  any  standard.  But, 
when  we  speak  generally  of  the  happiness  of  human  nature, 
it  is  so  much  connected  with  the  sensibilities  of  the  body, 
and  so  much  with  the  relations  of  society,  and  with  ideas  re- 
sulting from  its  customs,  habits,  and  opinions,  which  neces* 
earily  incorporate  themselves  with  ail  our  feelings,  that  the 


6,3 

eixternal  state,  anJ  visible  condition  of  mea  must  afford  us  a 
more  accurate  criterion  by  which  to  judge  of  the  equalities, 
or  inequalities  of  divine  providence,  than  any  interior  and  in- 
visible standard  of  mental  feeling.  And  by  this  scale,  sure- 
ly, we  do  not  perceive  the  rewards  of  virtue,  or  the  chastise- 
ments of  vice  bestowed,  or  inflicted  in  any  equitftble  degree 
according  to  the  respective  characters  of  men.  They  fall, 
rather  according  to  the  ingenuity,  vigilance,  and  perseverance 
of  individuals,  in  their  various  pursuits,  or  the  defect  of  those 
talents ;  or,  according  to  some  fortunate  accident,  rather 
tiian  according  to  merit. 

This  mixed  and  unequal  distribution  of  good  and  evil,  is 
probably  better  adapted  to  a  state  of  probation,  where  virtue 
is  exercised  and  tried,  by  being  thrown  into  various  circum- 
stances of  adversity  and  prosperity,  than  one  which  should 
indicate  a  more  exact  discrimination  of  character  would  be. 
But  it  is  contrary  to  all  our  ideas  of  the  divine  beneficence 
and  wisdom  to  believe  that  these  probationary  sufferings  are 
to  be  the  6nal  reward  of  virtue  ;  or  that  this  mixture  of  pleaa- 
are  and  pain,  in  which  the  pleasure  evidently  predominates, 
is  to  be  the  final  infliction  of  divine  justice  on  vice  which  dis- 
arranges  the  whole  order  and  harmony  of  the  moral  world. 

Prom  these  considerations,  we  have  the  justest  reason  to 
oonclude,  that  this  mixed  condition  of  human  life,  and  pro- 
miscuous distribution  of  divine  providence,  indicates,  only  a 


64 

preparatory  stale  of  moral  discipline,  wbich  has  a  reference 
to  another  and  higher  condition  of  being. — 

And  this  hope  we  have  seen  to  be  confirmed  by  the  anal- 
ogy  of  nature,  which  seems  inclined  not  to  leave  any  of 
her  works  luaperfect,  and  will,  therefore,  not  crush  in  the 
germ,  or  arrest  in  their  incipient  state,  so  many  noble  facul- 
ties  of  the  human  mind,  which  are  evidently  capable  of  at- 
taining a  degree  of  perfection  which  they  never  arrive  at, 
and  of  evolving  powers  which  they  never  display  in  the  pre« 
sent  life. — We  have  seen  it  confirmed  by  the  general  suf* 
frage  of  human  nature,  resting,  it  would  seem,  on  an  instinct- 
ive impression,  or  intuitive  conviction  of  the  mind,  expressed 
in  the  religious  opinions  of  all  nations. — It  is  further  confirm- 
ed  by  the  hopes  of  virtue,  and  the  fears  of  guilt,  especially 
at  the  approach  of  death.— -And  it  is  confirmed,  finally,  by 
the  unequal  distributions  of  good,  and  evil,  according  to  the 
moral  qualities  of  men  in  the  present  life. — 

These  moral  reasons  when  taken  separately,  may  not  be 
calculated  to  produce  entire  conviction  in  a  mind  disposed 
to  weigh  every  argument  with  scrupulous  distrust ;  yet, 
when  assembled  together  under  one  view,  they  present  such 
a  group  of  probabilities,  as  can  hardly  fail  to  cjarry  with 
them  every  candid  and  ingenuous  mind  ;  and  must  make  even 
the  cold  scepticism  of  infidelity  relent.  But,  I  must  repeat^ 
that  full,  unwavering  conviction,  on  this  most  interesting  sub- 


6,> 

jcct,  can  be  obtained  only  from  revelation,  which,  at  the 
same  time;  that  it  assures  us  of  the  fact  of  a  future,  and  im- 
mortal state  of  being,  discloses  to  us,  in  some  measure, 
wherein  it  consists.     ' 

On  the  nature  of  our  future  existence,  admitting  what 
reason  I  think  demonstrates,  that  it  is,  in  the  highest  degree 
probable,  we  can  form  no  precise  and  certain  ideas ;  that 
state  being  too  far  removed  beyond  the  range  of  our  present 
experience.  We  can  speak  of  it  only  in  the  most  general 
terms.  But,  from  the  analogy  of  what  actually  comes  under 
our  observation  of  the  process  of  nature,  we  have  just  ground 
to  conclude,  that  the  condition  of  human  life,  will  be  greatly 
improved  above  its  actual  state  in  the  present  world,  both  in 
personal  form,  if,  according  to  the  ideas  of  religion,  we  look 
for  a  re-union  of  the  body  with  the  soul,  and  in  the  powers 
of  the  mind.  In  those  transmutations  which  pass  under  our 
immediate  review  in  the  insect  tribes,  we  never  see  them  pass 
from  one  state,  to  resume  the  same  appearance  in  another, 
but,  iQ  each  gradation  in  their  progress,  they  acquire  augment- 
ed powers,  and  are  invested  with  new,  and  more  beautiful 
forms.  It  cannot,  therefore,  be  unreasonable  to  expect  a 
vast  augmentation  in  the  active  powers  of  our  nature,  both 
corporeal,  and  mental ;  in  the  quickness  and  vivacity  of  the 
senses,  in  the  beauty  and  excursive  force  of  the  imagination, 
and  the  penetration  and  energies  of  the  understanding.     And 

the  same  analogies  incline  ub  to  expect  the  addition  or  de- 

9 


66 

feiopement  of  many  new  faculties,  of  which,  in  the  present 
state,  the  imperfection  of  our  reason  cannot  fori»  any  con- 
ception. 

Nor  is  it  improbable  that,  in  an  immortal  existence,  the 
renovated  faculties  of  our  nature  will  advance  forward  in  ao 
endless  progression  of  improvements,  whether  reason  incline 
us  more  to  the  idea  of  one  continued  but  improving  form  of 
existence,  or  to  the  pylhagorean  principle  of  successive 
transmutations.  And  in  the  system  of  the  universe,  there 
is,  undoubtedly,  an  ample  theatre  for  an  interminable  progress 
both  in  knowledge  and  in  virtue.  Nor  can  we  doubt  but  that 
there,  the  wisdom,  the  power,  the  goodness,  and  equity  of 
the  divine  perfections  will  be  more  conspicuously,  and  illus- 
triously displayed,  than  in  the  present  introductory  state  of 
being. 

Such,  without  giving  any  unwarranted  license  to  the  ex= 
cursions  of  imagination,  and  judging  only  from  actual  analo= 
gies  presented  to  our  senses,  and  reason,  may  we  presume 
to  be  a  just,  as  far  as  it  is  extended,  though  most  imperfect 
outline  of  that  future  existence  to  which  virtue  ardently  as- 
pires, and  to  the  hope  of  which  the  most  cool,  and  dispas- 
sionate examination  of  reason  deliberately  affixes  its  seal. 

That  these  doctrines,  which  have  been  proposed  as  prin- 
ciples of  the  religion  of  nature,  concerning  the  existence^ 


67 

and  perfections  of  the  Supreme  Creator,  and  the  duties  ot 
huraan  nature  resulting  from  them,  taay  not  be  rejected  from 
the  natural  code,  as  partaking  too  much,  of  ideas  which  arc 
exclusively  Christian,  I  will  appeal,  for  their  verification,  as 
dictates  simply  of  reason,  bj^  a  few  references,  to  some  of  the, 
best  writers  of  heathen  antiquity.  They  exhibit,  indeed,  the 
results  of  reason  in  its  most  cultivated  state  ;  still,  however, 
they  are  deduced  solely  from  natural  principles.  The  same 
conclusion,  likewise,  is  strongly  affirmed  by  the  great  apostle 
of  the  Gentiles.  For,  according  to  his  unquestioned  tes- 
timony, **  The  invisible  things  of  God,  from  the  cre- 
ation of  the  world,  are  clearly  seen,  being  understood  by  the 
things  which  are  made,  even  his  eternal  power  and  godhead. 
When  the  Gentiles  who  have  not  the  law,  do,  by  nature,  the 
things  contained  in  the  law,  these,  having  not  the  law,  are  a 
law  unto  themselves  ;  which  shew  the  work  of  the  law  written 
in  their  hearts."  Accordingly  all  men  possess  from  nature 
many  just  notions  concerning  the  existence  of  the  Supreme 
and  Original  mind.  And  those  sages  of  paganism  who  have 
cultivated  these  primary  instincts  and  ideas,  by  a  refined  and 
enlightened  reason  have  been  able  to  advance  far  in  framing 
adequate  conceptions  of  the  glorious  attributes  of  the  Deity. 
With  numerous  principles  and  maxims,  in  proof  of  this  asser- 
tion, extracted  from  the  writings  of  these  authors,  I  might 
easily  fill  the  volume  ;  but,  perhaps,  it  is  eligible  to  restrict 
my  appeal  to  a  few  examples  ;  sufficient,  however,  to  furnish 
a  general  idea  of  the  state  of  human  science  upon  this  sub- 


68 

ject,  in  those  great  nations. — Cicero  pronounces  with  assur- 
ance, that  there  is  no  tribe  of  the  human  rare  so  barbarous, 
and  savage,  as  not  to  acknowledge  the  being  of  God.  And 
this  wonderful  consent  of  all  people,  he  adds,  is  to  be  esteem- 
ed the  voice  of  nature,  and  an  undoubted  argument  of  truth. 
Cic.  de  leg.  Do.  de  nat.  Deor.  Senec.  epist.  1  17.  The  same 
celebrated  author  exclaims,  where  is  the  man  so  void  of 
reason,  who,  when  he  casts  his  eyes  over  the  heavens,  does 
not  perceive  the  evidence  of  a  Deity  ?  Tusc.  quest.  70, 
de  arusp.  resp.  }9.  And,  in  his  book  de  divin.  and  in  that 
de  nat.  Deor.  148.  15.  90.  he  adds  ;  The  beauty  of  the  uni- 
verse, the  order  of  the  heavens,  the  revolutions  of  the  sun,  the 
moon,  and  all  the  celestial  bodies,  sufficiently  di^play,  at  the 
first  glance  of  the  eye,  that  they  are  not  the  effect  of  chance  ; 
but  that  there  exists  a  superior,  and  eternal  being  who  claims 
the  homage,  and  admiration  of  mankind. — The  better  part  of 
human  nature,  say  both  Cicero  and  Seneca,  is  the  soul  ;  but 
God  is  all  soul ;  he  is  reason  simply.  He  escapes  from  our 
view,  and  is  to  be  seen  only  in  our  thoughts. — Wherever 
you  turn  your  view,  says  the  latter  of  these  great  writers, 
there  you  have  God  meeting  you  ;  no  place  is  void  of  the  di- 
vine presence  ;  he  fills  all  his  own  works. 

The  great  orator  and  philosopher  of  Rome,  in  his  treatise 
concerning  laws,  lays  it  down  as  an  incontrovertible  maxim, 
that  religion  is  the  very  basis  of  a  wise  legislation.  The  first 
principle  of  social  order,  says  he,  is  the  persuasion  that  the 


69  . 

Gods  are  the  lords,  and  governors  of  all  things ;  and  that 
whatever  does  take  place  in  the  universe,  exists  by  their  dei- 
ty and  wisdom.  They  direct  human  affairs,  not  only  by 
general  laws,  but  by  laws  which  reach  to  every  individual  per- 
son, and  to  every  particular  event.  De  divin.  1 17.  Valerius 
informs  us,  that  Thales,  when  asked,  whether  the  actions  of 
men  could  ever  be  concealed  from  the  gods  ?  replied,  no,  not 
even  their  thoughts.  Lib.  7.  c.  2. 

The  duties  which  we  owe  to  GoJ,  as  taught  by  the  reli- 
gion of  nature,  we  learn  from  the  same  great  masters  of  rea- 
son. The  noblest  worship  of  the  gods,  says  Seneca,  ap. 
Lactan.  L.  6.  is  to  worship  them  with  a  pure,  upright,  and  un- 
corrupted  mind,  for  God  hath  no  place  upon  earth  more  ac- 
ceptable to  him  than  a  pure  soul.  Cicero  in  his  book  of  du- 
ties, pronounces  this  decision  ;  Let  men  ever  approach  the 
gods  with  chaste,  and  pure  spirits ;  for  piety  and  sanctity  alone 
render  them  propitious  to  mortals.  L.  2.  11.  Sextus,  in  his 
sentences,  has  this  remarkable  sentiment ;  Love  God  above 
your  own  soul.  For  if  you  are  void  of  supreme  love  to  God, 
to  him  you  will  never  go ;  and  love  him,  as  you  ought,  you 
Dcver  will,  unless  you  have  within  you  somewhat  that  resem- 
bles him. — Let  it  be  our  first  study,  says  Plato,  to  resemble 
God,  as  far  as  is  competent  to  human  nature ;  but  man  be- 
comes like  to  God  only  by  wisdom,  justice,  and  sanctify:  in 
Theat.  A  sentiment  of  the  same  author  approximates  his 
opinion,  in  no  small  degree,  to  the  principles  of  revelation. 


Virtue,  he  affirms,  does  not  come  from  nature,  nor  from  edu- 
cation, biJt  solely  from  the  divine  Numen,  or  Deity.  And,  in 
the  same  spirit,  Bias,  who  was  one  of  the  seven  wise  men  of 
Oreece,  prononnces,  whatever  good  you  have  done,  be  assured 
It  has  been  received  only  from  God.  Diogen.  Laer.  in  Biarn* 
And  Marcus  Antoninus,  under  the  conviction  that  all  things 
depend  on  God  alone,  renders  thanks  to  him,  in  the  history 
of  his  lifey  that  he  had  frequently  given  him  many  excellent, 
suggestions,  and  useful  assistances  towards  forming  his  mind, 
and  his  conduct  aright,  and  that,  both  in  youth  and  in  advan- 
cing life,  he  had  frequentl}^  rescued  him  from  many  occasions 
of  transgressing  the  lav»  s  of  virtue.  He  is  further  grateful  for 
his  having  bestowed  on  him  good  parents,  good  preceptors, 
and  excellent  friends. — The  great  orator  of  Rome,  in  his  trea- 
fise  denatnra  deorum,  asks,  if  reason,  faith,  virtue,  concord, 
exist  in  human  nature,  whence  could  they  have  descended  to 
the  earth  unless  from  the  gods  above  ? 

The  religion  of  nature,  not  less  that  that  of  revelaticHj 
though  unacquainted  with  the  infinite  mercy  of  the  Saviour, 
equally  requires  from  us,  feeble  and  dependent  creatures,  con- 
tinual ackowledgments  of  the  goodness  and  beneficence  of  the 
Infinite,  and  Divine,  Mind.  No  attribute  is  so  universally  felt 
and  acknowledged  by  mankind  as  his  goodness.  We  find  in 
the  eloquent  oration  for  Roscius  this  fine  passage  : — The 
blessings  which  we  use,  the  light  which  we  enjoy,  the  air 
which  we  breathe  are  granted,  and  bestowed  by  the  Supreme 


Dei/y,  The  gods  pour  forth  their  gifts  without  intermission., 
by  night  and  by  day.  Their  beneficence  is  sometimes  of- 
fered gratuitously  ;  sometimes  it  is  conferred  in  consequence 
of  our  prayers.  There  is  no  one  who  has  not  experienced 
these  celestial  blessings ;  not  one  to  whom  something  has 
not  flowed  from  this  most  benignant  fountain. 

These  few  principles  of  natural  religion  have  been  drawn 
from  the  first  masters  of  eloquence  and  reason,  who  derived 
all  their  moral  and  religious  maxims  simply  from  the  lights  of 
their  own  minds  ;  which  course  I  have  pursued  that  I  may 
not  be  charged  with  the  vain  and  theoretical  ambition  of  as- 
cribing more  to  the  powers  of  nature  than  christian  piety 
ought  to  concede  to  them.  On  the  subject  of  our  holy  re- 
ligion, most  certainly,  we  are  indebted  to  revelation  exclu- 
sively for  the  peculiar,  and  distinguishing  doctrines  of  the 
Christian  system.  But  the  powers  of  reason  which  God 
hath  bestowed  on  human  nature,  are  competent  to  enlighten 
the  mind  on  the  general  and  practical  duties  of  morality  and 
virtue.  The  spirit  of  inspiration  dees,  unquestionably,  illus- 
trate them  more  clearly,  and  confer  additional  evidence  and 
authority  on  the  prescriptions  of  conscience,  and  on  all  the 
motives  of  duly.  But,  it  is  useful,  explicitly  to  understand 
by  such  unquestioned  examples,  how  far  we  are  entitled  t© 
do  honour  lo  the  feeble  lights  of  our  natural  reason. 


EVIDENCES 


CHRISTIAN  RELIGION 


INTHODLCTION.       THE    NECESSITY  OF  R2VKLATI0.V. 

Before  proceeding  to  the  consideration  of  the  doctrines 
of  our  holy  religion,  it  is  necessary  in  the  first  place  to  dis- 
play its  evidenceSf  that  our  faith  may  not  be  merely  an  en- 
thusiastic and  visionary  confidence,  but  a  rational  offering  to 
truth  and  reason. 

And  if  I  should  propose  little,  or  even  nothing  that  is  iiew 
on  this  subject,  I  hope  to  be  able  to  comprise  the  general 
argument  in  favour  of  Christianity,  in  such  a  narrow  compass, 
and  exhibit  it  in  such  an  easy  and  perspicuous  order,  as  not 
only  to  afford  conviction,  but  furnish  a  concise  and  ready  an- 
swer to  those  popular  objections  which  are  most  frequently 
urged  against  the  holy  scriptures. 

But  before  proceeding  directly  to  exhibit  the  proofs  on 

which  our  faith  in  the  Christian  system  may  rationally  rest,  I 

shall,  in  the  first  place,  offer  to  you  several  considerations 

which  afford  a  strong  presumption  of  the  necessity  of  some 

10 


74 

divine  communication  from  heaven  to  instruct  mankind  in  the 
knowledge  of  their  dutj,  and  of  the  hopes  they  may  lawful- 
ly entertain  from  the  divine  mercy.  For,  if  revelation  be 
not  necessary,  and  reason  alone  be  sufficient  to  lead  man  to 
his  Creator,  and  to  furnish  him  with  all  the  principles,  the 
motives,  and  aids  of  duty  which  are  requisite  in  his  present 
state,  any  examination  into  the  truth  of  Christianity,  is  mani- 
festly superfluous.  But,  if  we  see  evils  reigning  over  the 
moral  world,  which  reason  and  philosophy  are  unable  to 
cure,  our  confidence  in  the  benignity  of  our  heavenly  Father 
will  naturally  lead  us  to  expect  his  interposition,  in  some  ex- 
traordinary way,  in  behalf  of  his  erring,  and  afflicted,  though 
disobedient  children. 

The  necessity  of  a  revelation  may  be  inferred  from  the  ex- 
treme ignorance,  and  even  the  monstrous  errors  with  regard 
to  the  being  of  God,  and  to  the  nature  of  the  worship  which 
he  requires,  as  well  as  with  regard  to  a  future  existence, 
which  prevailed  almost  universally  among  mankind  at  the 
period  of  the  birth  of  Christ ;  it  may  be  inferred  from  the 
extreme  and  universal  depravation  of  morals,  which  the 
lights  of  nature  and  the  aids  of  reason  had  become  utterly 
impotent  to  remedy  :  And,  finally,  it  may  be  inferred  from 
the  incapacity  of  the  unaided  powers  of  the  human  mind, 
satisfactorily  to  determine,  if  mercy  will,  or  can,  in  consis- 
tency with  the  justice  of  God,  and  the  purity  of  the  divine 
nature,  be  extended  to  the  guilty. 


75 

At  the  period  when  Christianity  first  appeared  in  the 
world,  (he  principles  even  of  natural  religion  had  nearly  per- 
ished from  among  men.  Instead  of  those  pure  and  sublime 
conceptions  which  every  reasonable  and  dependent  creature 
ought  to  entertain  of  the  supreme  and  infinite  Creator,  man- 
kind had  degraded  the  objects  of  their  worship  below  even 
the  vilest  and  most  profligate  of  their  worshippers.  "  The 
glory  of  the  incorniptible  God  they  had  changed  into  an 
image  made  like,  not  only  to  corruptible  man,  but  to  four- 
footed  beasts  and  creeping  things"  They  deified  all  the 
passions,  and  served  them  with  all  the  vices.  What  were 
Saturn  and  Moloch,  and  Venus  and  Bacchus,  but  cruelty, 
and  lust,  and  intemperance  personified  ?  And  what  were 
their  altars,  their  temples,  and  their  groves,  but  scenes  of 
the  grossest  pollution,  and  often  of  the  most  horrid  crimes  ? 
In  many  countries,  and  especially  in  India,  in  Egypt,  and 
Syria,  they  deified  the  obscenest  parts  of  the  human  body, 
and  served  these  detestable  idols  wjth  a  correspondent 
worship. 

The  ideas  which  they  framed,  and  the  hopes  which  they 
conceived  of  a  future  state  of  existence,  were  so  uncertain 
and  obscure  ;  and  were  at  best,  so  gloomy  and  uncomforta- 
ble, as  to  afford  little  encouragement  and  support  to  the 
heart  in  those  painful  self-denials,  and  those  arduous  conflicts 
which  it  must  often  undergo  in  aspiring  to  an  elevated  pitch 
cf  virtue.      As  little  were  they  calculated  to  console  it  at 


the  af>proach  of  death,  wbicb,  to  them,  was  the  loss  of  ev- 
ery enjoyment,  and  of  every  hope ;  and  still  less  to  elevate 
it  above  the  mere  pleasures  of  sense,  and  to  prepare  it  here- 
after for  a  spiritual  and  celestial  state  of  being.  Reason,  in- 
deed, in  its  highest  improvements,  however  it  may  accumu- 
late probabilities,  can  afford  no  secure  expectation,  of  the 
immortality  of  the  soul.  But,  in  the  hand  of  vice,  it  is  used 
rather  as  a  weapon  to  destroy  this  precious  hope ;  for,  im- 
mortality  can  be  desirable  only  to  virtue.  And  when  this 
expectation  is  destroyed,  the  broadest  encouragement  is  laid 
open  to  every  sensual  and  criminal  excess.  For,  if  no  high- 
er and  happier  condition  of  being  awaits  the  virtuous ;  if  the 
vicious  have  no  future  retribution  to  apprehend,  why  should 
Uiey  impose  any  restraint  upon  their  present  pleasures? 
Can  any  maxim  be  more  natural  to  the  misjudging  mass  of 
mankind,  the  children  of  appetite  and  passion,  than  that  of 
the  degenerate  disciples  of  Epicurus  :  Let  tis  eat  and  drinkf 
for  tomorrow  we  die  ? 

From  these,  and  other  causes  connected  with  them,  the  de- 
pravation of  morals  had  become  extreme  throughout  all  the 
nations  of  antiquity  before  the  advent  of  the  Messiah.  They 
had  long  abandoned  that  simplicity  of  manners  which  reign- 
ed in  ihe  primitive  ages  ;  and  which  was,  in  part  at  least,  to 
be  ascribed  to  those  just  and  noble  sentiments  of  the  deity 
which  appear  to  have  been  entertained  by  the  patriarchs  of 
the  old  world.      Sentiments  which  were  probably  the  re" 


77 

mains  of  an  original  revelation  imparted  by  God  to  the  father 
of  the  human  race,  and  repeated  to  the  second  progenitor 
of  mankind  after  the  deluge,  and  by  him  communicated  to 
the  nations  immediately  springing  from  him.  For,  in  pro- 
portion as  men  descended  farther  from  this  source,  and  the 
traces  of  this  primitive  tradition  became  obscure,  and  mix- 
ed with  the  errors  and  fables  which  time  incorporated  with 
it,  we  find  the  deepest  ignorance  and  the  grossest  idolatry 
prevailing,  together  with  a  correspondent  corruption  of  mor- 
als, which,  in  a  course  of  ages,  arrived,  at  length,  to  bid  de- 
fiance to  all  restraint  and  all  decency.  The  apostle  Paul, 
in  the  first  chapter  of  his  epistle  to  the  Romans,=^  has  drawn 
a  dark  and  melancholy  picture  of  the  moral  state  of  the  hea- 
then world;  and,  addressing  converted  Romans  and  Greeks, 
he  implicitly  appeals  for  its  verification  to  their  own  obser- 
vation and  experience.  And  some,  even  of  their  own  wri- 
ters, have  given  to  us  the  same  picture  in  colours  hardly 
less  dark.  No  where,  perhaps,  can  we  find  a  portrait  of  the 
moral  state  of  men  given  in  deeper  shades  than  that  which 
Juvenal  has  drawn  of  the  manners  of  Rome  in  his  age.  And 
though  some  allowance  is  to  be  made  for  the  colourings  of 
poetry,  and  especially  of  satire  ;  yet  satire  must  be  drawn 
from  real  life,  and  present  to  us  a  strong  resemblance  of  char- 
acter, otherwise,  it  loses  all  its  effect. 

*  Rom.  chap.  l.v.  24-31. 


It  may  be  asked,  perhaps,  if  reason,  prudently  and  dili- 
gently applied,  might  not  have  produced  a  reform  of  this 
general  corruption?  I  answer  without  hesitation  that  this 
was  an  effect  beyond  its  power.  It  cannot  proraulge  its 
laws  with  sufficient  clearness  and  certainty  ;  and  these  laws 
are  destitute  of  adequate  sanctions.  That  it  wants  certain' 
ty  is  evident  from  the  eternal  doubts,  disputes,  and  contra-s' 
dictions  of  its  pretended  lawgivers,  the  philosophers.  It 
may  be  still  more  evident  to  those  observers  of  human  na- 
ture who  have  seen  with  what  facility  the  heart  is  able  to 
bias  or  tincture  every  moral  dictate  of  the  understanding 
when  opposed  to  our  self-love.  But,  in  the  next  place,  its 
laws  are  destitute  of  adequate  sanctions.  The  sanctions  of 
the  law  of  reason  and  nature  consist  only  in  that  self-appro^ 
bation  which  springs  from  the  love  of  truth  and  the  per- 
formance of  our  duty,  and  those  inward  reproaches  of  con- 
science which  follow  an  action  that  we  feel  and  acknowledge 
to  be  wrong.  But  what  is  the  love  of  truth  or  duty  in  a  heart 
that  is  already  corrupted  ?  And  how  feeble  are  the  reproach- 
es of  conscience,  when  not  enforced  by  the  belief  that  we  are 
accountable  to  a  supreme  Judge,  and  by  the  expectation  of 
a  future  state  of  retribution !  Its  faltering  remonstrances  are 
easily  appeased  by  the  flatteries  of  self-love,  or  stifled  in  the 
tumults  of  pleasure.  No  :  a  corrupt  age,  a  degenerate  world 
never  can  be  reformed  by  the  influence  of  reason  alone. 
Its  lights  are  too  dubious  and  uncertain  ;  its  sanctions  are 
too  feeble.     The  mass  of  mankind  are  not  capable  of  com- 


79 

prebending  the  one,  nor  of  treing  rationally  governed  by  (h» 
force  of  the  other. 

The  masters  of  science  among  the  Greeks,  fully  persuad- 
ed of  this  truth,  never  pretended  to  impart  to  the  people  any 
of  their  moral  or  theological  systems  ;  believing  them  incom- 
petent to  comprehend  their  first  principles,  and  still  more  in- 
capable of  pursuing  these  principles,  in  a  train  of  regular, 
but  often  complicated  deductions,  to  their  legitimate  conclu- 
sions. Hopeless  therefore  of  their  reformation,  they  aban- 
doned them  to  the  powers  of  superstition,  to  practise  its  ab- 
surd, and  often  licentious  rites,  without  attempting  to  instruct 
them.  This  it  was  that  made  Socrates  say,  as  Plato  has  re- 
corded the  conversation,  "  You  may  resign  all  hope  of  re- 
forming the  manners  of  men,  unless  it  please  God  to  send 
some  person  to  instruct  you."  And  made  Plato  himself 
say,  "  Whatever  is  set  right,  in  the  present  ill  state  of  the 
world,  can  be  done  only  by  the  interposition  of  God."^ 
These  maxims  of  these  great  philosophers  imply  that,  though 
the  people  may  be  capable  of  receiving  the  most  wise  and 
excellent  principles  of  theology,  or  of  morals,  from  authority/ 
which  is  supposed  to  be  divine;  yet,  if  they  were  set  to 
work  them  out  by  the  efforts  of  their  own  understanding,  or 
by  the  aid  of  merely  human  teachers,  the  moral  state  of  the 
world  must  be  irremediable.     Blind  and  arrogant,  or  scepti- 

'^  Plato's  treatise  coTicprning;  a  r^TTibUc  ;  hof^kvi. 


80 

lial,  must  be  the  (eachers ;  dull,  and  incapable  of  learning, 
or  bewildered  in  fhe  doubls  of  their  masters,  must  be  the 
scholars. 

Such  was  the  necessity,  felt  and  acknowledged  by  the 
wisest  men  in  the  heathen  world,  of  some  revelation  from 
heaven  to  instruct  mankind  in  the  knowledge  of  the  truth, 
and  to  give  it  effectual  operation  on  their  hearts  and  lives. 
If  the  great  body,  even  of  the  populace,  seem  now  to  be 
more  susceptible  of  rational  ideas  on  the  subject  of  religion  ; 
if  they  entertain  sublimer  and  purer  apprehensions  of  the  di- 
vine nature,  and  of  that  spiritual  worship  which  should  be 
paid  to  the  supreme  Creator  ;  and  if  we  see  the  tone  of  pub- 
lic morals  raised  to  a  higher  pitch,  and  regulated  by  a  higher 
standard  ;  if  every  where  we  behold  that  very  populace^ 
who  were  denounced  by  the  philosophers  as  incapable  of  a 
rational  system  of  religion,  thinking  more  wisely  and  more 
justly  on  the  transcendent  subjects  of  (he  divine  naturej  of 
human  duty,  and  the  immorlaliti/  of  the  soul,  than  those 
philosophers  themselves,  are  we  not  fairly  entitled  to  ascribe 
these  effects  to  the  influence  of  our  holy  religion ;  since  rea- 
son had  before  tried,  in  vain,  her  full  force  upon  the  human 
mind  and  the  human  character  ? 

But,  the  impotence  of  reason  to  instruct  and  reform  man- 
kind, is  not  to  be  seen  only,  or  even  chiefly,  in  the  ignorance 
and  vices  of  the  people.     It  is,  perhaps,  not  less  discernible 


SI 

in  the  errors,  the  follie?,  and  corruptions  of  the  philosophers 
themselves,  who  cultivated  it  with  the  greatest  assiduilj,  and 
who  boasted  having  carried  it  to  its  highest  improvement. 
What  do  we  find  among  them  but  eternal  doubts  and  con- 
tradictions :  opinions  ever  varying,  and  settled  on  no  certain 
basis  of  truth  ;  which  were,  therefore,  found  utterly  incompe- 
tent to  control  the  passions,  or  to  regulate  the  conduct  even 
of  the  professed  disciples  of  reason  ?  The  lives  of  the  philo- 
sophers,  with  few  exceptions,  were  not  less  dissolute  than 
those  of  the  people  whom  they  despised.  And,  on  the  real 
nature  of  religion,  and  the  true  principles  of  duty,  the  sage, 
as  will  be  seen  hereafter,  was  scarcely  better  informed  than 
the  peasant. 

But,  lest  these  reproaches  should  seem  to  be  the  result 
merely  of  the  prejudices  of  religion,  let  me  appeal  to  Cicero, 
the  greatest  of  philosophers,  as  well  as  of  orators,  who  de- 
nounces them  in  still  stronger  language :  "  Do  you  thinfc, 
says  he,  that  these  precepts  of  morality  had  any  influence, 
except  in  a  very  few  instances,  upon  the  men  who  speculat- 
ed, wrote,  and  disputed  concerning  them?  No:  who  is 
there  of  all  the  philosophers  whose  mind,  life,  and  manners 
were  conformed  to  the  dictates  of  right  reason  ?  Which  of 
them  ever  made  his  philosophy  the  law  and  rule  of  his  life, 
and  not  merely  an  occasion  of  displaying  his  own  ingenuity  ? 
Which  of  them  has  conformed  himself  to  his  own  doctrines, 
or  lived  in  obedience  to  his  own  precepts  ?  On  the  contrary, 

IT 


many  of  them  have  been  slaves  to  the  vilest  iusts,  to  pride^ 
to  avarice,  and  to  other  similar  vices.''* 

Nor  is  this  surprising  to  those  who  consider  that  the  ex- 
treme refinements  of  reason,  which  arise  from  the  naturad 
ambition  of  human  pride,  to  extend  its  authority  beyond  its 
proper  sphere,  always  tend  to  dogmatical  error  in  bold  and 
ardent  minds,  or  to  the  cold  indifference  of  scepticism,  in 
minds  of  an  opposite  character.  What  is  really  within  the 
reach  of  human  reason  lies  near  the  surface,  and  is  obvious 
to  a  sincere  and  impartial  love  of  truth.  But  when  we 
would  penetrate  deeper  into  the  causes  and  the  nature  of 
things,  attempting  to  pass  the  limits  prescribed  to  human 
intellect,  we  are  immediately  bewildered  in  error  and  doubt. 
Hence  the  existence  of  a  Supreme  and  Intelligent  Cause  of 
the  universe,  which  to  a  plain  and  honest  mind  seems  an  in- 
tuitive dictate  of  the  understanding,  has  become  doubtful,  as 
soon  as  ingenious  men  have  made  it  a  subject  of  speculation. 
They  have  pretended  to  doubt  of  their  own  existence,  of 
the  existence  of  the  universe,  and  the  reality  of  their  own 
sensations.  At  best,  the  most  important  principles  of  reli- 
gion and  morals  are  thrown  out  merely  as  subjects  of  inge- 
nious disquisition,  intended  to  exercise  and  display  their  wit 
There  existed  accordingly,  in  the  various  schools  of  Greece, 
such  diversity  and  contradiction  of  sentiment,  such  subtlety 

*  Tusculan  Questions  j  book  ii. 


83 

and  refinement,  and  often  such  systematic  scepticism,  tliat 
their  theological  and  moral  principles,  thrown  into  the  gene- 
ral mass  of  the  subtleties  of  science,  about  which  they  wexe 
accustomed  to  dispute,  lost  all  authority  over  human  con* 
duct.  In  a  short  period  after  the  introduction  of  philoso- 
phy, the  greater  part  of  its  professors  became  both  vicious 
in  their  lives,  and  atheistical  in  their  opinions.  And  these 
masters  of  science,  instead  of  proving  the  reformers  of  the 
world,  only  hastened  its  corruption  ;  and,  by  weakening  or 
destroying  the  ideas  of  a  Supreme  Judge,  and  a  future  re- 
tribution, opened  a  wider  door  to  the  licentious  indulgence 
of  all  the  passions. 

PROOF  OF  AN  ORIGINAL  REVELATION  TO  MAN.       IMPO- 
TENCE OF  REASON.       NECESSITY  OF  A 
NEW  REVELATION. 

The  impotence  of  reason  alone  to  accomplish  the  refor- 
mation of  the  world,  in  the  midst  of  the  darkness  and  cor- 
ruption into  which  it  was  sunk,  is  manifest  from  this  addi- 
tional fact,  that  the  longer  men  relied  upon  it,  and  cpmmit- 
ted  themselves  to  the  guidance  solely  of  its  lights  ;  that  is, 
the  farther  we  descend  in  history  from  the  beginning  of  time, 
the  more  absurd  do  we  find  the  superstitions  of  the  people/ 
the  more  atheistical  and  impious  the  systems  of  the  philoso- 
phers, and  the  more  degenerate  the  morals  of  both. 


84 

Inasmuch,  as  mankind,  at  the  coming  of  Christ,  had  near- 
ly lost  the  knowledge  of  the  true  God,  and  his  worship  ;  and, 
as  their  moral  depravity  had  kept  pace  with  their  religious 
errors,  and  none  of  the  ordinary  powers  of  human  reason 
were  found  competent  to  remedy  evils  so  extreme,  it  seems 
consistent  with  all  just  ideas  of  the  perfections  of  God,  and 
conformable  to  our  reasonable  hopes  in  his  wisdom,  good* 
ness,  and  compassion,  that  he  should  interpose,  by  some  ex- 
traordinary communication  of  himself,  to  save  religion  from 
utterly  perishing,  and  to  recal  men  to  virtue  and  order  by 
the  knowledge  of  divine  truth.  The  lights  of  tradition 
which  had  been  gradually  growing  more  dim  for  ages,  were 
now  nearly  extinguished  under  a  mass  of  the  most  corrupt  and 
shameful  superstitions  that  ever  oppressed  the  world,  and 
degraded  human  nature.  And  the  wisest  sages,  bewildered 
in  eternal  doubt,  and  beholding  around  them  vices  in  the  ha- 
bits of  mankind  which  they  knew  not  how  to  amend,  and 
mysteries  in  the  order  of  nature  and  of  providence  which 
they  knew  not  how  to  unravel,  began  to  despair  of  the  cause 
of  truth,  and  of  the  reformation  of  the  world.  What  the 
simple  and  unaided  powers  of  human  understanding  could 
not  discern  any  adequate  and  certain  means  of  effecting,  has 
been  accomplished  by  the  luminous  evidence,  and  the  pow- 
erful influence  of  divine  revelation.  Doctrines,  at  least 
claiming  to  be  derived  from  this  source,  have  banished  from 
the  greater  portion  of  the  earth  the  gross  idolatry  in  which 
the  ancient  nations  were  sunk ;  and  raised  the  general  mor- 


85 

als  of  llie  world  to  a  much  Ligber  and  purer  standard.  No 
where  do  we  now  behold  ahars  or  consecrated  groves,  rear- 
ed to  such  divinities  as  Moloch  or  Saturn,  as  Astarte,  or  the 
Cjprian  Venus.  Every  where  we  find  purer  and  sublimer 
ideas  of  the  divine  nature,  and  of  that  worship  of  the  heart 
which  ought  to  be  paid  to  God.  Christianity  has  extended 
a  salutary  influence  even  among  many  tribes  of  the  human 
race  who  have  not  yet  embraced  her  holy  doctrines,  and 
shed  some  rays  of  a  divine  light  into  the  darkness  which  still 
rests  upon  the  pagan  nations,  which  we  trust,  will  gradually 
increase,  till  at  length  the  Sun  of  Righteousness  shall  illumi- 
nate the  whole  earth. 

The  insufficieucy  of  reason  (o  correct  the  moral  depravi. 
iy  of  the  world  will  appear  with  irresistible  evidence  to  those 
who  duly  consider  its  defect  of  certainti/,  its  defect  of  au- 
thority,  and  its  defect  of  motives.  Its  defect  of  cerlainiy. 
Reason  can  proceed  but  a  small  distance  with  any  certainty, 
in  investigating  moral  and  divine  truth,  beyond  those  obvi- 
ous, simple,  and  almost  intuitive  dictates  of  the  mind  which 
are  common  to  all  mankind.  And,  in  a  corrupted  state  of 
manners,  experience  demonstrates  that  even  these  plain  and 
natural  dictates  may  easily  be  brought  into  doubt  by  the  so- 
phistry of  the  heart,  when  they  oppose  its  inclinations  and 
pleasures.  But  if  the  principles  and  laws  of  duty,  and  of 
divine  truth,  were  much  more  clear  and  precise  than  they 
are,  stijl  reason  is  wanting  in  the  necessary  authority  to  en- 


86 

force  them  on  the  hearts  of  men,  and  give  them  effect  in  prac- 
tice. This  authority,  in  order  to  overcome  the  powerful 
temptations  to  sinful  indulgence  which  are  every  moment 
acting  with  a  dangerous  influence  on  a  heart  already  yield- 
ing to  thera,  should  be  nothing  less  than  the  acknowledged 
command  of  the  supreme  Legislator  and  Judge  of  the  uni- 
verse which  would  preclude  cavil  and  doubt,  sanctioned  by 
a  power  to  which  no  resistance  can  be  opposed,  and  direct- 
ed by  a  justice  which  cannot  be  turned  aside  from  its  sure 
and  awful  course.  When  a  man  is  accountable  only  to  him- 
self, feeble  indeed  is  the  voice  of  conscience,  or  of  reason 
on  one  side,  when  his  self-love,  or  his  passions  plead  on  the 
other.  And  finally,  the  motives  to  virtue  which  reason  has 
it  in  her  power  to  propose,  the  rewards  for  its  self-denials, 
the  encouragements  in  its  conflicts,  the  supports  under  its 
various  trials  and  temptations,  are  weak  and  inefficient. 
Does  she  propose  the  pure  pleasures  of  virtue  ?  But  in  order 
to  relish  them,  you  must  be  already  virtuous.  Can  their 
calm  and  innocent  delights  be  set  against  the  ardent  and  tur- 
bulent enjoyments  of  vice  ?  Can  reason  demonstrate  that 
virtue  would  be  eventually  its  own  reward  even  in  this 
world  ?  Yet  you  arrive  at  this  conclusion  by  such  a  tedious 
circuit,  and  it  is  incumbered  by  so  many  modifications  and 
exceptions,  that  seldom  can  this  refined  speculation  combat 
the  force  of  a  present  and  importunate  passion.  But  if  vir- 
tue is  unfortunate,  as  it  often  is,  if  it  must  often  forego  in- 
terest, power,  favour,  in  its  adherence  to  duty  ;  what  reward 


87 

is  there  (o  indemnify  it  for  its  sacrifices  ?  What  authority  to 
overawe,  and  restrain  it  from  yielding  to  the  profitable  temp- 
tation ?  No  :  the  awful  majesty  of  God,  the  apprehensions 
of  his  supreme  judgment,  the  eternal  retributions  of  virtue 
and  of  vice  in  a  future  state  of  existence,  which  religion  sets 
before  the  mind,  will  ever  be  found  necessary,  and  are  no 
more  than  suflScient  to  combat  the  corrupt  influence  of  the 
heart,  and  of  the  world.  The  impotence  of  reason,  therefore, 
to  cure  the  infinite  errors  of  the  human  mind,  the  idolatries, 
the  superstitions,  the  vices  of  mankind,  appears  from  every 
aspect  in  which  the  subject  presents  itself  to  our  view,  and 
justifies  the  conclusion  we  have  inferred  from  it :  the  neces- 
sity of  a  new  revelation  to  pestore  to  the  earth  the  truth 
which  it  had  lost,  and  to  redeem  it  from  evils  which  the  or- 
dinary poweis  of  human  reason  had  become  unable  to  correct. 

This  conclusion  ^s  justified  by  another  most  important  and 
interesting  fact.  Man  is  evidently  a  guilty  being ;  he  has 
violated  the  moral  law  of  his  nature,  and  incurred  the  right- 
eous displeasure  of  his  Creator,  and  the  infliction  of  all  the 
dreadful  penalties  with  which  the  supreme  lawgiver  has 
thought  it  necessary  to  guard  his  law.  These  penalties, 
which  are  not  arbitrary  in  their  nature,  but  are  the  decrees  of 
infinite  wisdom  and  justice,  do  not  depend  merely  on  the 
will  of  the  legislator,  probably  they  do  not  depend  even  on 
infinite  goodness,  to  inflict  or  dispense  with  them  si  its  plea- 


88 

sure.  Every  attribute  of  the  deiij  is  as  necessary  in  its  na- 
ture and  its  claims  as  the  divine  existence.  Eternal  justice, 
therefore,  cannot  as  far  we  can  judge,  forego  the  punishment 
of  guilt.  This  is  the  ardent  and  terrible  dictate  of  a 
convinced  conscience,  not  less  than  the  calm  and  deliber- 
ate conclusion  of  reason.  But,  how  shall  the  claims  of  infi- 
nite justice  be  reconciled  with  the  claims  of  infinite  mer- 
cy? How  shall  the  inviolable  justice  of  the  law  of 
eternal  truth  and  holiness  be  satisfied,  in  consistency  with 
the  forgiveness  and  salvation  of  the  sinner  ?  In  what  way 
may  a  sinful  mortal  reasonably  hope  to  approach  his  offend- 
ed Maker  ?  How  shall  the  heirs  of  death  regain  eternal  life  ? 
These  are  inquiries  to  which  the  weakness  of  human  under- 
standing can  return  no  satisfactory  answer ;  and  the  dying 
sinner,  under  the  guidance  of  reason  only,  must  be  over- 
whelmed with  the  most  distressing  perplexities  and  doubts, 
or  abandoned  to  the  most  horrible  despair.  These  are 
doubts  which  God  only  can  resolve;  fears  which  the  spirit 
of  inspiration  only  can  calm,  by  drawing  aside  the  deep  veil 
which  conceals  eternity  from  our  view,  and  exhibiting  to  our 
faith  a  complete  oblation  for  the  sins  of  the  world.  Here  we 
behold  new  proofs  of  the  necessity  of  a  divine  revelation,  new 
causes  to  invite,  an^justify  the  interposition  of  our  heavenly 
Father,  in  behalf  of  his  miserable,  though  offending  children. 

And  is  not  the  gospel  such  a  remedy  as  we  needed,  such 
a  revelation  as  is  calculated  to  solve  all  the  doubts,  and  tran- 


CD 

quilize  all  the  apprehensions  of  penitent  guilt  ?  Tn  it  you  be- 
hold the  divine  justice,  and  the  divine  mercy  harmoniously 
combined.  In  it  you  behold  the  divine  law  magnified  and 
made  honourable,  by  an  all-availing  atonement  for  the  offen- 
ces of  the  whole  world.  In  it  you  behold  life  and  immor- 
talily  brought  to  light,  and  a  glorious  channel  opened  in 
which  the  boundless  current  of  divine  mercy  can  freely  flow 
to  mankind.  Where  reason  and  philosophy  were  silent,  or 
constrained  to  confess  their  impotence,  we  behold  revelation 
announcing  her  glad  tidings,  and  triumphing  in  the  happiness 
of  her  children,  and  of  the  world. 

EVIDENCES    OF    REVELATIOIT.       NECESSITY    OF    MIRACLES. 

MR.  Hume's  celebrated  objection  to  miracles. 

If  the  necessity  of  some  interposition  by  heaven,  in  order 
to  recal  mankind  from  the  monstrous  errors  of  idolatry,  io 
make  known  to  them  the  perfect  law  of  their  duty,  and  to 
enforce  it  by  adequate  sanctions,  is  so  evident,  as  has  been 
shown  in  the  preceding  reflections,  this  necessity  affords  a 
presumption  in  favour  of  revelation.  And  if  any  revelation 
be  admitted  to  be  either  necessary  or  probable,  no  doubt  can 
be  entertained  of  the  superior  claims  of  Christianity  above 
every  pretence  which  has  ever  been  set  in  opposition  io  it 
This  is  admitted  by  its  enemies  themselves ;  and  must  be 
admitted  by  every  candid  and  reflecting  inquirer  who  con- 
siders the  purity  of  its  doctrines,  the  spirituality  of  its  wor- 

12 


90 

sBip,  the  simplicity  and  excellence  of  the  principle  which  it 
lays  at  the  foundation  of  its  moral  system,*  its  tendency  to 
universal  happiness,  the  grandeur  of  the  prospects  which  it 
opens  into  the  eternal  world,  and  the  sublime  conceptions 
which  it  every  where  imparts  of  the  divine  nature. 

But  the  truth  of  Christianity  does  not  rest  on  the  absolute 
perfection  o^  lis  doctrines,  of  which  the  frailty  of  human  rea^ 
son  is  very  incompetent  to  judge ;  nor  on  our  conclusions 
concerning  what  ought  reasonably  to  be  expected  of  the  in- 
finite benignity  and  goodness  of  our  heavenly  Father,  in  be- 
half of  his  erring  and  miserable  creatures:  conclusions  in 
which  we  often  depart  widely  from  the  actual  rule  of  the  di- 
vine government ;  but  it  rests  on  such  evidences  as  every 
man  of  a  sound  mind  who  honestly  applies  his  understand- 
ing to  the  subject,  is  capable  to  judge  of;  evidences  which 
propose  themselves  directly  to  the  senses,  or  arise  out  of  the 
known  and  immutable  laws  of  human  nature. 

Accordingly  they  may  be  arranged  under  two  heads :  the 
positive  and  direct,  which  are  addressed  immediately  to  the 
senses ;  and  the  collateral,  or  presumptive,  which  arise  out 
of  a  just  consideration  of  the  laws  of  human  nature  relative- 
ly to  this  subject.  Of  the  former  kind  are  miracles  and  the 
fulfihnent  of  prophecy.     Of  the  latter,  are  those  conclusions 

*  The  love  of  God  and  the  love  of  man. 


91 

which  are  justly  drawn  from  the  excellence  and  peculiarity 
of  character  of  the  author  of  Christianity,  from  the  humility 
of  the  instruments  employed  to  promulgate  the  gospel  to  man- 
kind, compared  with  the  sublimity  and  perfection  of  the 
doctrines  which  they  preached ;  from  its  rapid  and  exten- 
sive progress,  and  the  important  moral  changes  which  it  has 
produced  in  the  world ;  and  from  many  other  similar  facts 
which  cannot  be  satisfactorily  accounted  for  on  the  ordinary 
principles  of  human  nature,  or  of  human  action  ;  and  which, 
therefore,  imply  a  divine  agency  and  direction.  The  for- 
mer, when  fairly  attended  to,  do,  in  each  particular  case, 
carry  with  them  entire  conviction  of  the  immediate  interposi- 
tion of  God ;  for  none  but  God  can  operate  a  miracle,  or  foretell 
with  minute  accuracy,  future  and  distant  events.  The  latter 
though,  singly  taken,  they  do  not  aitiount  to  absolute  proof, 
yet  collectively,  produce  the  highest  degree  of  probability. 

By  certain  writers  every  pretence  to  miracles  becomes  im- 
mediately suspected,  and  is  deemed  a  sufficient  reason  for 
not  ei)'  "ing  farther  into  an  examination  of  the  evidences  of 
revelation.  This  is,  in  effect,  declaring  it  to  be  impossible 
for  God  to  communicate  himself  by  any  revelation  of  his 
will  to  mankind.  For  if  he  ever  deigns  to  make  such'  com- 
munication, it  can  only  be  made  immediately  by  himself,  or 
by  inspired  men,  who  speak  as  the  organs  of  his  Holy  Spi- 
rit. If  it  be  made  immediately  by  himself,  either  by  means 
of  a  divine  voice  from  heaven,  or  by  any  supernatural  im» 


92, 


presBion  on  the  senses,  such  a  revelation  must  be  itself  one 
of  the  greatest  of  miracles.     If  holy  men  speak  as  they  are 
inspired  by  the  Holy  Ghost,  can  their  testimony  be  received 
with  a  rational  faith,  unless  it  be  accompanied  by  such  works, 
or  such  clear  predictions  of  future  events,  above  the  power, 
and  beyond  the  foresight  of  man,  as  will  demonstrate  that  it 
is  God  who  speaks  by  them  ?     In  no  other  way  can  a  divine 
mission  be  authenticated.     I  repeat  it  then,  if  it  is  reasona- 
ble to  expect  a  revelation  from  God  in  any  circumstances  of 
the  world ;    if  a  revelation  is   not  impossible,   or  in  the 
highest  degree,  improbable;  miracles  are  not  only  not  in- 
credible, but  necessary.     No  revelation  can  found  any  just 
claim  to  the  belief  of  mankind,  on  any  other  ground  in  the 
first  instance,  than  such  supernatural  and  miraculous  opera- 
tions as  the  power  of  God  only  can  effect ;  or  such  clear 
predictions,  as  none  but  an  omniscient  spirit,  who  foresees 
the  end  from  the  beginning,  and  has  laid  the  whole  train  of 
causes  and  events  in  the  universe,  could  impart  to  the  hu- 
man mind.     If  then,  the  christian  system  contains  a  real 
communication  to  mankind  from  the  infinite  fountain  of  truth, 
it  must  have  been  announced  under  the  seal  of  great  and  nu- 
merous miracles,  for  prophecy  itself  is  a  species  of  miracle. 
On  the  other  hand,  if  we  possess  satisfactory  evidence  that 
such  miracles  were  wrought  at  the  promulgation  of  the  gos- 
pel, we  ought  to  entertain  no  doubt  of  its  being  the  word  of 
God ;  since  it  comes  to  as  vouched  by  the  seal  of  God.     For 
what  is  a  miracle  ?    A  proper  understanding  of  this  term 


93 

should  lie  iit  the  foundation  of  our  present  inquiry.  It  is 
such  an  inversion,  or  suspension  of  the  ordinary  laws  of  na- 
ture as  can  be  reasonably  ascribed  only  to  bim  by  whom 
those  laws  were  originally  ordained.  And  whenever  he  con- 
descends to  work  a  miracle,  the  operation  of  his  almighty 
power  must  be  regarded,  by  every  rational  mind,  as  the 
sanction  and  seal  of  truth. 

In  exhibifing  the  direct  and  positive  evidence  of  christi- 
anity,  I  shall,  in  the  first  plac454*'eat  of  the  evidence  of  mi- 
racles ;  and  afterwards  of  that  derived  from  prophecy. 

To  the  apostles,  the  miracles  of  our  blessed  Lord  were 
immediate  objects  of  sense :  to  us,  they  come  through  the 
medium  of  human  testimony  ;  but  testimony  of  such  a  kind, 
and  confirmed  by  so  many,  and  such  extraordinary  circum- 
stances accompanying,  or  following  the  miracles  themselves, 
and  dependent  upon  them,  that  no  facts,  perhaps,  in  the  his- 
tory of  the  world  have  ever  descended  to  posterity  vouched 
by  such  a  weight  of  moral  evidence.  They  arc  attested  by 
numerous  witnesses  of  the  soundest  judgment,  and  the  most 
unsuspected  integrity  :  by  men  whose  writings  evidently  de- 
monstrate that  they  were  at  the  greatest  distance  from  that 
weakness  of  mind  on  the  one  hand,  which  would  render  them 
liable  to  be  deceived  themselves ;  and,  on  the  other,  from 
that  ardent  enthusiasm,  or  that  knavery  of  character,  which 
would  incline  them  to  pass  a  deception  upon  others  for  th^ 


94 

«ake  of  obtaining  credit  to  their  own  visions :  by  men  who 
without  any  motives  of  interest  or  of  honour,  and  even  in 
the  certain  prospect  of  disgrace  and  poverty,  of  arduous  and 
incessant  labours,  of  continual  dangers  and  persecutions, 
and  at  length  of  death  itself  in  the  most  formidable  shapes, 
devoted  themselves  to  announce  this  miraculous  history  to 
the  v.orld :  by  men,  I  add,  whose  original  prepossessions 
were  all  opposed  to  the  character  which  their  Master  assum- 
ed, and  the  doctrines  which  he  taught,  and  who,  after  a  long 
time,  yielded  those  prejudices  only  to  the  force  of  convic- 
tion operated  by  repeated  miracles ;  and,  finally,  by  men 
who,  in  ihe  end,  conquered  the  world,  and  overturned  afl 
its  ancient  ideas,  manners,  institutions,  all  the  pride  of 
its  philosophy,  and  all  the  self-sufficiency  of  human  rea- 
son, by  the  power  with  which  they  themselves  were  en- 
dued of  operating  miracles  similar  to  those  which  had 
subdued  their  own  assent.  These  facts,  afford,  it  seems  to 
me,  the  strongest  confirmation  of  the  miraculous  history  of 
the  gospel,  and  of  the  wisdom,  the  integrity,  and  credibili- 
ty of  those  holy  and  chosen  witnesses  by  whom  God  has 
been  pleased  to  convey  it  down  to  us. 

But  we  are  met  at  our  very  entrance  upon  this  subject 
with  a  formidable  objection,  which  it  is  necessary  in  the  first 
place  to  remove,  before  the  most  credible  testimony  in 
favour  of  the  reality  of  the  miracles  of  our  Saviour,  will  be 
admitted  by  those  who  have  undertaken  to  deny  the  authori- 


95 

ty  of  revelutiou.  The  objection  may  be  considered  in  a 
speculative,  and  in  a  practical  view.  In  the  former,  the  sum 
of  it  is  :  that  the  plans  of  infinite  wisdom  are  immutable  ;  for 
otherwise,  they  would  not  be  perfect.  God  himself,  there- 
fore, cannot  change  the  order  of  nature,  still  less  can  he  allow 
a  feeble  mortal,  for  any  purposes  whatever,  to  change  it,  in- 
asmuch as  it  has  been  established  by  his  own  most  perfect 
wisdom.  I  answer,  that  the  plans  of  divine  intelligence  must 
be  immutable,  as  long  as  the  reasons  on  which  they  were 
originally  arranged  remain  the  same.  But  if  those  reasons 
are  changed,  may  they  not  induce  a  proportionable  change 
in  the  order  of  providence  ?  Inasmuch  then,  as  the  existence 
and  the  whole  system  of  this  world,  bear  a  relation  to  the 
moral  state  of  man,  if  man  has  criminally  changed  his  original 
state,  and  although  created  in  innocence,  has  fallen  into  sin, 
although  created  immortal  has  become  liable  to  death,  can 
we  pronounce  it  unworthy  the  gooodness,  or  the  wisdom  of 
God,  to  afford  his  creature,  humbled  and  conscious  of  guilt, 
the  hope  of  mercy,  and  to  confirm  that  precious  hope  by 
such  visible  interpositions  of  divine  power  as  leave  the  peni- 
tent sinner  no  room  to  doubt  but  that  it  is  God  himself  who 
is  the  author  of  his  consolation  ? 

The  second  view  in  which  this  objection  has  been  present- 
ed is  less  speculative.  It  is  the  celebrated  argument  ascribed 
to  the  ingenuity  of  Mr.  Hume,  although,  it  is  probable  of 
much  earlier  origin,  and  which  has  exercised  the  talents  of 


96 

several  able  anJ  judicious  writers  to  refute  its  sophistry.-'^'  I 
tliinfc  I  shall  weaken  nothing  of  its  force  by  the  following 
statement;  All  our  knowledge  of  natural  things  we  derive 
solely  from  experience.  And  the  only  rational  ground  of 
our  belief  of  what  has  ever  happened,  or  what  can  happen  in 
the  world,  is  our  own  experience  of  the  regular  and  constant 
course  ef  nature.  Men  may  impose  upon  us  by  false  testi" 
mony,  or  they  may  be  deceived  themselves  ;  but  nature  never 
changes.  Inasmuch  then,  as  we  have  had  no  experience  of 
any  miraculous  changes  in  the  order  of  the  world,  it  is  un- 
reasonable to  believe  that  any  such  have  ever  taken  place, 
'whatever  may  be  the  number,  or  the  character  of  the  wit- 
nesses by  whom  tJiey  have  been  attested.  If  the  principle 
of  this  objection  is  found  to  be  false,  the  whole  objection 
must  fall  to  the  ground  with  it.  If  it  will  not  hold  in  its  ap- 
plication universally  to  other  subjects,  it  is  contrary  to  all 
just  reasoning  to  admit  its  validity  only  against  the  miracles 
of  the  gospel.  Let  lis  then  try  its  application  in  other 
cases  ;  let  us  follow  it  to  its  ultimate  consequences  ;  these 
will  be  found  suflScient  to  destroy  it.  It  leads  to  atheism  ; 
acted  upon  in  its  full  extent  it  would  resist  all  improvements 
in  science ;  it  will  be  found,  in  opposing  the  moral  to  the 
physical  phenomena  of  nature,  to  refute  itself.     At  least  the 


-^  Particularly  Dr.  Campbell  in  his  treatise  on  miracles.  Bishop  Watson  in  his 
tHird  letter  to  Mr.  Gibbon,  having  introduced  the  subject,  appears  to  me  to  have? 
'in  a  few  sentences,  effectually  overturned  the  principle  on  which  the  whole  objec- 
tion rests. 


9? 

taoral  phenomena  will  conclude  as  strongly  in  favour  of  the 
miracles  of  the  gospel  as  the  physical,  admitting  the  justness 
of  the  principle,  would  seem  to  contradict  them. 

I  return  back  on  these  ideas.  And  in  the  first  place,  it 
leads  to  atheism.  For,  if  our  own  experience  is  the  sole 
and  exclusive  ground  of  judging  of  whatever  is  credible  in 
the  physical  history  of  the  world,  it  is  unreasonable  to  be- 
lieve that  this  globe  ever  had  a  beginning,  or  that  it  will  ever 
perish.  It  must  always  have  existed,  and  must  always  con- 
tinue to  exist  in  the  same  state  in  which  we  now  behold  it. 
There  can  be  no  future  condition  of  existence  for  human  na- 
ture, no  future  judgment,  no  future  retribution  to  the  righ- 
teous and  the  wicked.  For  each  of  these  states  implies  a 
condition  of  things,  such  as  has  never  come  under  our  ob- 
servation, or  been  the  subject  of  our  experience.  There 
is,  on  this  supposition,  no  foundation  for  religion.  The  or- 
der of  the  world  must  be  eternal,  immutable,  necessary  ;  and 
can  have  no  dependence  on  a  creating  and  intelligent  cause. 
We  must  embrace  the  philosophical  absurdity  of  an  eternal 
SHccession  of  mutable  and  perishing  beings  ;  and  are  driven 
to  the  impious  alternative  of  believing  that  there  is  no  God ; 
or,  that  the  universe  itself  is  God.* 


®  This  tenet  of  the  Aristotelian  philosophy  has  always  beCS  regarded^by  ebrii- 
*iati3  as  only  a  modificatioa  of  atheism. 

13 


S8 

These  consequences  are  deduced  so  obviously  from  the 
principle  of  Mr.  Hume,  that  it  is  not  a  little  surprising  that 
they  have  not  been  more  frequently  remarked.  Scarcely, 
indeed,  have  they  been  observed  by  any  writer  who  has 
fallen  in  my  way,  except  the  learned  and  ingenious  Dr.  Al- 
lix,  in  his  reflections  on  the  books  of  the  sacred  scriptures,'^ 
Yet  if  they  are  fairly  and  legitimately  drawn,  they  must  be 
decisive  against  the  principle  in  the  opinion  of  every  pious 
and  virtuous  man. 

Another  consequence  of  this  doctrine,  though  not  charge- 
able with  impiety  like  the  former,  equally  demonstrates  its  ab- 
surdity. It  would  arrest  all  great  improvements  in  science. 
When  the  effects  of  the  electric  or  magnetic  influence,  for 
example,  were  first  discovered,  how  ought  all  philosophers, 
according  to  this  principle,  to  have  treated  the  history  of 
their  phenomena?  Precisely  as  infidels  have  treated  the 
miraculous  history  of  the  gospel ;  rejected  it  without  exam- 
ination, as  absurd  and  impossible,  because  contrary  to  their 
experience.  Do  you  say,  they  have  it  their  power  to 
repeat  the  experiments  by  which  those  new  properties  in 
nature  were  originally  discoverd.  But  if  the  principle 
which  we  combat  iiB  just,  what  motive  could  a  philosopher 


*  Tins  work  of  Dr.  Allix,  a  celebrated  French  refusee,  was  published  in  London 
in  the  year  1688,  which  sufBciently  demonstrates  that  the  objection  of  Mr.  Hume 
to  the  miracles  of  the  gospel  is  not  novel ;  but  has  only  been  set  in  a  new  light, 
and  urged  with  more  plausibility  by  that  ingenious  wiiter. 


99 

have  for  repeating  these  experimentf?,  since  his  own  past  ex- 
perieuce  of  (he  course  of  nature  is  (he  sole  ciilerion  of  what- 
ever is  credible.  And  whence  should  the  greater  portion 
of  mankind  derive  their  knowledge  who  possess  neither  the 
skill,  nor  the  means  requisite  to  make  the  necessary  expeii- 
ments,  if  thej  are  not  to  rely  for  the  truth  of  new  facts  in 
science,  and  facts  the  most  remote  from  the  analogy  of  their 
own  experience,  upon  the  testimony  of  others?  Must  not 
the  progress  rf  science  be  arrested  almost  at  its  commence- 
ment ? 

Let  us  take  another  example  in  which  no  experiment  can 
possibly  be  applied  to  verify  the  testimony  of  the  narrators 
with  regard  to  facts  the  most  certain  in  nature.  The  inha- 
bitants of  a  torrid  climate  never  can  have  (he  effects  of  frost 
presented  to  their  senses.  Congelation  is  as  great  a  myste- 
ry to  them,  as  any  mystery  or  miracle  of  the  christian  reli- 
gion. According  to  this  favourite  maxim  of  infide!ity,  then, 
they  ought  to  refuse  all  credit  to  the  fact :  and  the  king"  of 
Siam  acted  according  io  the  principles  of  sound  wisdom 'ir 
punishing  the  Dutch  nayigator  for  insulting  his  understand- 
ing by  incredible  stories,  who  assured  him,  that,  in  Holland, 
water  had  became  so  hard  during  part  of  the  year,  that  it  bore 
horses  and  carriages  upon  its  surface.  If  testimony  were, 
under  no  circumstances,  sufficient  to  vouch  to  us  facts  which 
not  only  are  not  conformable,  but  which,  in  many  instances, 
are  contrary,  to  all  our  past  experience,  science  must  be 


100 

circumscribed  within  a  very  narrow  sphere.  This  conse^- 
qiienre  was  certainly  not  adverted  to  by  the  ingenious  author 
who  invented,  or  who  gave  its  present  form  to  the  principle 
against  which  we  contend.  It  was  aimed  solely  against  the 
miracles  of  the  sacred  scriptures.  But  when  we  are  testing 
the  merit  of  a  principle,  if  it  is  not  found  to  hold  universally, 
or  coextensively  with  the  latitude  of  its  terms,  it  cannot  fur- 
nish the  ground  of  any  certain  conclusions.  For,  by  what 
rule  shall  we  apply  it  only  to  the  facts  of  religion,  when  it  is 
false  in  its  application  to  the  facts  of  science  ?  Miracles  then, 
as  well  as  other  extraordinary  facts  in  nature,  are  suscepti- 
ble of  proof  from  testimony.  The  only  subject  of  inquiry  is, 
the  competence  and  integrity  of  the  witnesses :  the  sound- 
ness of  their  judgment,  the  accuracy  of  their  observation, 
the  fidelity  of  their  narration.  In  all  these  respects  the  dis- 
ciples of  our  blessed  Saviour,  the  witnesses  of  his  miracles 
will  be  found  to  possess  a  decided  superiority  over  the  wit- 
nesses of  any  other  facts  recorded  in  historys  Their  wri- 
tings  demonstrate  their  wisdom ;  their  long  intimacy  with 
their  Master  is  sufficient  to  give  us  confidence  in  the  accu- 
racy of  their  observation ;  their  labours,  their  sacrifices, 
their  deaths,  attest  their  sincerity,  and  the  fidelity  of  theb 
narration.* 

I  maintain,  in  the  last  place,  that  this  celebrated  argu- 
ment, drawn  from  our  experience  of  the  uniformity  of  natute 

*  These  topics  will  hereafter  be  more  amply  illustrated. 


101 

refutes  itself.     For,  if  the  physical  course  of  nature,  oh 
which  the  argument  rests,  is  found  to  be  stable  and  uniform, 
the  moral  order  of  things  appears  to  be  not  less  steady  and 
regular.     If  the  former  of  these  facts    opposes,  upon  Mr. 
Hume's  principle,  our  reception  of  the  miraculous  history  of 
the  gospel;  the  latter,  upon  the  same  ground,  forbids  the  re- 
jection of  that  history,  if,  by  rejecting  it,  we  must  contradict 
all  the  moral  phenomena  of  human  nature.     Admitting  then, 
what  can  hardly  be  denied  by  the  bitterest  enemies  of  Chris- 
tianity, that  the  apostles  and  evangelists  were  men  of  the 
soundest  understandings,*  and  the  most  upright  hearts,  it  is 
contrary  to  all  that  we  know  of  the  motives  of  human  con- 
duct, that,  for  the  sake  of  propagating  a  most  improbable, 
and  to  them,  unprofitable  imposture,  they  should  voluntari- 
ly  submit  to  incessant  toils  and  extreme  sufferings ;  they 
should  abandon  all  that  is  usually  accounted  most  dear  to  the 
human  heart,  and  march  with  intrepidity  through  perpetual 
persecutions  to  certain  death  inflicted  in  the  most  excruciat- 
ing and  dreadful  forms.     Their  writings,  which  are  always 
rational  in  their  doctrines,  simple  in  their  style,  and  calm  and 
judicious  in  their  manner  of  address,  exempt  them  from  eve- 
ry charge  of  enthusiasm  ;  yetj  renouncing  all  the  early  pre- 
judices of  their  nation,  in  which  they  had  been  educated 


*  The  perfection  of  that  system  of  piety  and  morals  published  by  these  humble 
Mshermen,  so  far  excelling  the  philosophy  of  their  age,  demonstrates  that  if  they 
were  not  inspired  from  above,  they  must  have  possessed  a  df^jree  of  wisdom  and 
•iliderstauding  far  surpassing  whaterer  antiquity  has  produced  besides. 


102 

and  all  the  hopes  which  they  had  originally  conceived  from 
a  royal  and  triumphant  Messiah,  which  might  have  inflam- 
ed the  zeal  of  enthusiastic  minds,  do  we  not  see  them,  for  a 
suffering  Master,  encounter  every  actual  evil,  and  every 
possible  hazard  ?  If  then,  we  should  suppose,  according  to 
the  spirit  of  this  objection,  that  the  apostles,  who  expected 
no  recompense  in  this  world,  could  have  acted  from  any 
other  motive  than  a  deep  conviction  of  the  miraculous  pow- 
er, and  the  divine  mission  of  Jesus  Christ,  would  we  not 
be  involved  in  contradictions  to  the  moral  order  of  things ; 
that  is,  to  all  the  ordinary  principles  of  conduct  among  men 
which  have  ever  occurred  to  our  experience,  not  less  won- 
derful, and  out  of  the  course  of  nature,  than  were  the  mira- 
cles themselves  in  the  attestation  of  which  these  wise  and  pi- 
ous men,  the  companions  and  witnesses  of  his  life,  made  such 
astonishing  and  almost  incredible  sacrifices  ? 

Thus  does  this  so  much  vaunted  objection  against  the  mi- 
racles of  the  gospel  refute  itself;  inasmuch  as,  in  its  appli- 
cation to  the  moral  order  of  things,  it  contradicts  the  conclu- 
sion which  the  enemies  of  religion  have  drawn  from  their 
physical  order.  And  this  consequence  t)ught  to  be  ad- 
mitted by  those  especially  who  have  most  earnestly  urg- 
ed this  objection  against  the  evangelic  history,  since, 
according  to  their  philosophic  system,  they  subject  the 
natural  and  the  moral  world  equally  to  the  laws  of  neces- 
sity.    I  repeat,  then,  that  it  is  not  by  the  nature  of  the  works 


103 

ascribed  to  Christ  as  being  conformable,  or  contrary  to  our 
experience,  but  by  the  character  and  competence  of  the  wit- 
nesses, together  wilh  all  (he  preparatory  and  attending  cir- 
cumstances of  these  miracles,  and  their  consequences  upon 
the  world,  that  the  question  of  their  truth  is  to  be  decided. 

THE    CREDIBILITY  OF    THE    WITNESSES    OF    THE  MIR.tCLES 
AND    RESURRECTION    OF    CHRIST. 

Let  US  then  enter  a  liltle  more  particularly  into  the  char- 
acter of  the  witnesses  of  the  gospel,  the  circumstances  under 
which  its  miraculous  history  was  published  to  the  world,  and 
has  been  transmitted  to  us,  and  the  wonderful  consequences 
which  followed  its  publication.  A  brief  review  of  these  to- 
pics, while  it  will  confirm  ihe  answer  which  has  been  given 
to  the  objection  of  Mr.  Hume,  particularly  in  the  last  vie\;r 
which  we  have  taken  of  it,  will  serve,  at  the  same  time,  to 
strengthen  our  faith  in  the  evangelic  history,  both  by  the 
support  which  we  will  find  it  possesses  in  the  clearest  and 
most  unequivocal  laws  of  moral  evidence,  and  by  the  extra- 
ordinary effects  which  have  resulted  from  it,  which  plainly 
required  the  power  of  a  divine  cause  to  produce  them. 

As  it  has  been  shewn  that  there  is  no  insuperable  objec- 
tion, arising  from  the  nature  of  miracles,  against  their  exist- 
ence, when  alleged  in  favour  of  a  divine  revelation ;  and 
a?  they  have  been  demonstrated  even  to  be  necessary  proof* 


104 

of  a  divine  mission,  if  God  should  ever  deign  to  reveal  hk 
will  in  anj  extraordinary  manner  to  the  world,  the  credit  of 
the  miracles  which  are  said  to  have  been  wrought  in  confir- 
mation of  the  gospel  must  depend  primarily  on  the  credibili- 
ty of  the  witnesses  who  have  attested  them.  And,  when  this 
subject  is  fairly  and  candidly  examined,  not  only  will  these 
witnesses  be  found  entided  to  the  highest  credit,  but  their 
testimony  will  appear  calculated  almost  irresistibly  to  com- 
mand our  assent ;  with  so  many  circumstances  of  authority 
and  certainty  is  it  attended,  which  place  it  far  before  the 
evidence  by  which  any  other  facts  in  the  compass  of  univer- 
sal history  have  been  vouched. 

The  witnesses  of  extraordinary  facts  ought  to  be  men  of 
unblemished  integrity,  and  of  clear  and  penetrating  discern- 
ment ;  unbiassed  by  any  motives  of  interest  which  might  be 
liable  to  blind  them  to  the  truth,  or  to  corrupt  the  purity  of 
their  testimony.  And  certainly  the  apostles  and  evangelists 
of  0ur  blessed  Lord  have  left  us,  in  their  writings,  their  dis- 
courses, and  their  conduct,  the  most  indubitable  proofs  of 
the  soundest  understanding,  of  the  sincerest  piety,  and  the 
most  disinterested  devotedness  to  the  best  interests  of  man- 
kind, which  would  render  it  impossible,  in  a  long  course  of 
intimacy  with  their  Master,  to  be  deceived  by  any  fictitious 
demonstrations  of  a  divine  power,  and  should  free  them  from 
every  suspicion  of  fabricating  a  history  to  impose  upon  the 
world. 


105 

They  were,  indeed,  plain,  unlettered  men,  called  froQi 
3ome  of  the  humblest  occupations  in  life  to  follow  Christ 
and  to  be  the  heralds  of  his  grace  to  mankind.  But  this  cir- 
cumstance, instead  of  detracting  from  their  merit  as  'wilness- 
eiB  of  the  miracles  of  our  Lord,  will,  when  rightly  consider- 
ed, give  additional  weight  to  their  testimony.  For,  when 
we  take  into  view  that  admirable  and  profound  wisdom,  that 
perfect  moral  code,  and  that  pure  and  sublime  theologyj, 
which  their  writings  contain,  so  far  superior  to  what  was  to 
be  expected  from  their  education  and  rank  in  life,  and  ex- 
celling whatever  has  appeared  on  these  subjects  in  the  sys- 
tems of  the  most  venerated  sages  of  the  pagan  world  ;  may 
we  not  well  ask,  as  the  astonished  fellow  citizens  of  Jesus 
did  with  respect  to  him,  whence  had  these  men  this  wisdom^ 
unless  it  were  given  them  from  above  ?  If  we  admit  that  this 
wisdom  was  imparted  to  them  immediately  by  God,  it  de- 
cides the  question  of  their  divine  mission.  If  we  say  it  was 
simply  the  effect  of  native  genius,  it  decides  their  competen- 
cy, in  point  of  understanding  and  judgment,  to  be  the  wit- 
nesses of  the  wonderful  history  of  our  Lord,  and  their  per- 
fect title  to  our  fullest  credit,  as  far  as  depends  on  accuracy 
of  observation,  and  the  judicious  discrimination  of  truth  from 
ull  false  pretences  to  miraculous  powers. 

But  in  the  next  place,  their  writings  exhibit  also  the 

strongest  characters  of  sincerity  and  integrity.     We  discern 

'"^  ihf^m  no  appearance  of  that  art  which  is  necessary  t* 

14 


sovi^r  the  pretences  of  imposture,  but  an  uodesigning  Sins-« 
plicity  which  speaks  powerfully  to  the  heart.  Hardly  ever 
can  impostors  effectually  conceal  the  faults  of  their  own 
character  behind  the  disguises  of  hypocrisy.  But  in  the 
New-Testament,  we  discern  only  the  purest  precepts  of  mo- 
rality, and  the  noblest  sentiments  of  a  genuine  and  rational 
piety.  If  the  apostles  speak  from  their  hearts,  as  there  is 
every  appearance  that  they  do,  the  purity  of  their  doctrines, 
as  well  as  the  simplicity  of  the  manner  in  which  they  are 
conveyed  to  us,  are  calculated  to  impress  us  with  a  deep  con- 
viction of  their  integrity  and  uprightness,  not  less  than  of 
their  wisdom. 

Piety  and  sincerity  have  a  language  peculiar  to  them- 
selves ;  simple  and  unaffected,  equally  distant  from  the  tor- 
tuous art  of  imposture,  and  the  extravagances  of  enthusiasm. 
There  is  a  naivete'  which  runs  through  the  whole  narration 
of  the  evangelists,  and  bears  all  the  impressions  of  truth,  in- 
finitely remote  from  the  style  of  an  artificial  tale  made  up  by 
cunning  and  designing  men. 

This  conviction  will  be  greatly  strengthened  when  we 
lake  into  our  view  the  circumstances  under  which  the  follow- 
ers of  our  blessed  Lord  published  the  gospel,  and  its  mira- 
culous history  to  the  world.  Their  disinterested  labours,  suf- 
ferings, and  sacrifices,  demonstrate  in  the  strongest  manner 
their  sincerity,  and  their  profound  persuasion  of  the  truth 


X  107 

and  the  importance  of  those  holy  doctrines  which  they 
taught,  and  those  astonishing  facts  which  they  published 
to  the  universe.  And  the  perfect  sinceriiy  and  persuasion 
of  men,  at  once  so  pious  and  so  wise,  who  were  so  capable 
of  discriminating  reahty  from  pretence,  and  who  had  so 
many  opportunities  of  intimately  observing  the  works  whicii 
they  attest,  afford  to  the  candid  and  serious  inquirer,  the 
most  satisfactory  grounds  of  belief. 

Let  us  contemplate  the  disinterestedness  and  sufferings  of 
the  first  mini^rs  of  Christianity,  and  witnesses  of  the  mira- 
cles of  our  Saviour.  They  speak  a  powerful  language  to 
the  heart,  and  leave  us  no  room  to  question  the  sincerity  and 
the  perfect  veracity  of  these  faithful  men.  It  is  true  that 
men,  impelled  by  a  bold  and  ardent  ambition,  or  inflamed  by 
the  hope  of  fortune,  or  of  glory,  may  sometimes  endure  wi(h 
fortitude  the  greatest  sufferings,  or  encounter  with  firmness 
the  most  formidable  dangers.  But  without  the  prospects  cf 
honour  or  emolument,  and  in  the  face  of  poverty  and  dis- 
grace, of  universal  obloquy  and  hatred,  of  the  fiercest  perse- 
cutions and  the  mo^  cruel  deaths,  voluntarily  to  undertake 
to  propagate  a  known  and  deliberate  imposture,  merely  for 
the  glory  of  a  Master  who  had  already  perished  by  an  igno- 
minious death,  and  from  whom,  of  consequence,  no  farther 
expectations  could  be  entertained  ;  and,  with  a  patience  and 
heroism  worthy  only  of  the  highest  virtue  and  the  noblest 
ends,  to  consent  io  be  the  ministers  of  falsehood,  deceit  and 


30$ 

yillany,  is  contrary  to  all  the  known  principles  of  human  ac- 
tion, and,  in  such  men  as  (he  apostles,  is  utterl^r  incredible* 
Jesus  Christ  profwised  to  his  disciples  no  rewards  in  the  exe- 
cution of  their  arduous  mission  but  such  as  should  take  place 
in  a  future  state  of  existence  ;  of  which  they  cpuld  have  no 
other^  assurance  than  his  own  miracles.    If  then  they  made 
such  astonishing   sacrifices,  as  it  is  known  they  did  make, 
from  no  rational  motive,  with  no  prospect  of  recompense,  it 
was  a  solitary  phenomenon,  altogether  inexplicable  on  any  of 
the  ordinary  principles  of  conduct  among  men.     On  the  oth- 
er hand,  if  they  were  governed  by  the  hope  of  future  and  ce- 
lestial rewards,  their  belief  of  which  could  rest  only  on  their 
perfect  conviclion  of  the  truth  of  the  miracles  and  resurrec- 
tion of  the  Saviour,  what  stronger  evidence  could  we  demand 
of  the  reality  of  these  facts  ? 

Their  Master  not  only  promised  them  no  rewards,  but 
forewarned  them  that  they  should  suffer  in  his  cause  every 
evil  that  could  be  inflicted  by  the  hatred,  the  malice,  and  the 
power  of  men.  And  they  were  accordingly  exposed  to 
«Tcry  form  of  contumely,  pain  and  death.  They  were  load- 
ed with  chains,  thrust  into  dungeons,  lacerated  with  scourging, 
crucified,  sawn  asunder,  clothed  with  the  skins  of  wild  beasts 
and  exposed  to  be  hunted  by  dogs,  burnt  at  the  stake,  in- 
vested with  pitched  shirts,  to  which  when  fire  was  applied, 
they  were  used  as  torches  in  the  night  to  light  the  barbaroag 


U9 

;sports  of  the  popu]ace.*=  These  terrors  were  sufficient,  one 
would  think,  to  shake  the  constancy  of  integrity  itself ;  but 
certainly,  more  than  sufficient  to  appal  hypocrisy  and  false- 
hood, or  even  the  least  doubtfulness  of  the  cause  in  which  Jj 
they  were  embarked.  But  by  no  fear  of  suffering,  nor  by 
any  hope  of  reprieve  could  these  good  men  be  moved  to  re- 
tract, or  to  mutilate  or  disguise,  any  part  of  the  history  of 
a  Master  who  was  dearer  to  them  than  their  own  lives.  If 
they  would  only  have  denied  the  resurrection  of  Christ,  they 
could  have  delivered  themselves  out  of  the  most  cruel  suf- 
ferings, which  were  often  such  that  we  can  hardly  conceive 
how  human  nature  could  support  them.  Yet  their  dying 
breath,  their  last  accents  were  still  used  to  confirm  their  un- 
wavering testimony.  And  among  such  numbers,  not  one 
was  found  to  falter.  What  can  mark  in  the  minds  of  men  a 
deeper  conviction  of  truth  ? 

A  consideration  which  gives  no  small  additional  weight 
to  the  argument  is,  that  all  the  original  prejudices  of  their  ed- 
ucation, and  of  national  pride  and  glory,  were  strongly  op- 


*  A  variety  of  passages  in  the  epistles  of  the  apostles,  and  in  the  history  of  their 
acts  by  Saint  Luke,  gire  us  this  representation  of  their  extreme  suflFerings,  which 
18  confirmed  by  almost  all  the  Roman  writers  of  that  period  who  have  come  down 
to  us  J  particularly  by  Suetonius,  Pliny,  Juvenal,  Martial,  Epictetus,  Marcus 
Aurelius,  and  Tacitus.  "Their  sufferings  at  their  execution,  says  Tacitus,  were 
aggravated  by  insult  and  mockery  ;  for  some  were  disguised  in  the  skius  of  wild 
beasts,  and  worried  to  death  by  dogs ;  some  were  crucified,  and  others  were 
wrapt  in  pitched  shirts,  and  set  on  fire  when  the  day  was  closed,  that  theymi^ht 
nerve  as  lights  to  illunuQate  the  aiglit.*' 


119 

posed  to  the  character  in  which  their  Master  appeared,  andf 
to  the  doctrines  which  they  were  afterwards  constrained  to 
preach.      They,   with  the  whole  nation  of  Israel,  expected 

tin  the  Messiah  a  mighty  temporal  prince,  invested  with  the 
E'plendonrs  of  empire,   who  was  to  restore  the  kingdom  of 
Dra  id,  and  extend  its  dominion  over  all  the  kingdoms  of  the 
world,  in  which  his  followers  and  disciples  were  to  arrive  at 
the  highest  honouis  and  distinctions.     When,  therefore,  they 
found  all  the  pre-possessions,  in  which  they  had  been  nurs- 
ed, and  which  had  been  cherished  by  their  country  for  ages, 
overthrown  ;    when  Jesus  informed  them  that  his  kingdom 
was  not  of  this  world,  a  doctrine  wJiich  they  could  hardly 
be  made  to  understand,  and  thus  disappointed  all  their  most 
flattering  hopes  ;  when,  instead  of  the  magnificent  prospects 
which  they  Lad  pictured  to  themselves,  he  set  before  them 
only  his  own  bumble  fortunes,  and  his  approaching  death ; 
only  the  persecutions  to  which  they  should  be  exposed  in 
preaching  in  the  name  of  a  despised  Master ;  what  could 
have  continued  to  attach  them  to  a  cause  so  diflferent  in  ev» 
ery  respect  from  what  they  had  conceived,  and  one  appa- 
rently so  desperate,  but  the   manifest  proofs  of  divinity 
which  attended  him,  but  those  wonderful  facts  before  their 
eyes,  which  conquered  their  prejudices,  and  compelled  their 
conviction?    They  could  not  believe  that  he  was  to  die  till 
they  saw  him  expire ;  they  neither  believed,  nor  understood 
the  resurrection  of  the  dead  till  they  saw  him  restored  from 
the  tomb.    Even  then,  it  was  long,  through  the  astonisli- 


Ill 

mcnt  of  their  minds,  before  they  could  give  full  credit  1« 
tlieir  own  senses.  They  conversed  with  him,  they  touched 
hiui,  they  thrust  their  hands  into  his  wounded  side.  They 
could  yield  such  powerful  prejudices,  supported  by  all  the 
strongest  passions  of  human  nature,  only  to  the  most  sensible 
demonstrations.  But  when  their  conviction  was  once  con- 
quered by  the  illustrious  displays  of  a  divine  power,  and 
nothing  but  the  most  illustrious  displays  of  such  a  power 
could  have  conquered  it,  in  opposition  to  every  interest  and 
every  prejudice  hitherto  cherished  by  them  with  the  great- 
est fondness,  then  they,  who  had  before  been  so  reluctant,  so 
unbelieving,  so  timid  in  the  cause  of  a  suffering  Master,  were 
ready  to  encounter  every  form  of  danger,  of  suffering,  and  of 
death,  in  proclaiming  the  resurrection,  and  ihe  miraculous 
history  of  their  Lord.  Such  a  revolution  in  their  ideas  and 
their  conduct  must  have  proceeded,  as  they  declared  it  did, 
only  from  the  irresistible  manifestations  of  3.  divine  power 
with  which  he  contirmed  his  doctrine,  and  demonstrated  his 
title  to  a  spiritual  and  heavenly  kingdom. 

It  may  be  said  that  fortitude  and  patience  in  enduring  suf- 
ferings, is  no  certain  proof  of  the  truth  of  any  system  of  prin- 
ciples ;  because  an  enthusiastic  mind  may  be  so  wound  up, 
as  to  dare  any  danger,  or  to  support  any  pain,  in  defence  of 
its  favourite  opinions.  I  confess  that  voluntary  suffering  in 
any  cause,  is  not  an  infallible  test  of  truth,  but  it  is  a  test  of 
sincerity.    It  demonstrates  the  full  persuasioa  of  the  soul  of 


112 

ihe  truth  of  the  facts  for  which  it  suffers.  This  is  all  that  i^ 
necessary  to  command  our  assent  in  the  present  case.  The 
disciples  of  our  Lord  have  demonstrated,  by  this  infallible 
criterion,  their  full  conviction  of  the  reality  of  his  resurrec- 
tion, and  of  his  miraculous  operalioHS.  These  were  objectis 
of  the  senses  in  which  they  could  not  be  mistaken.  They 
were  men,  as  appears  from  their  writings,  of  the  soundest  un- 
derstandings, who  could  not,  therefore,  be  imposed  upon  in 
cases  so  palpable.  No  tincture  of  enthusiasm,  which  could 
warp  their  imagination,  appears  in  their  conduct,  or  in  that 
history  which  they  have  left  us  of  the  life  and  actions  of 
Christ.  Men  as  they  were,  of  sound  understandings  and  of 
rational  piety,  a  conviction  in  our  minds  of  the  sincerity  of 
their  declarations  is  all  that  is  necessary  to  gain  for  them  full 
credence  to  the  miraculous  facts  which  they  relate.  There 
is  a  wide  difference  between  dying  in  attestation  of  a  fact;, 
and  to  prove  our  adherence  to  an  opinion.  In  our  opinions 
we  may  err,  and  an  enthusiastic  mind  may  maintain  its  er- 
rors at  the  stake  with  no  less  ardour  than  it  would  adhere  to 
truth.  But  in  facts,  such  as  those  related  by  the  apostles 
and  disciples  of  our  Lord,  subjected  as  they  were  to  the  ex- 
amination of  all  the  senses,  and  for  so  long  a  time,  it  was  im- 
possible for  men  so  judicious,  so  honest,  and  so  faithful,  to 
be  deceived.  Their  sincerity  is  all  that  we  need  to  assure 
us  of  the  miracles  contained  in  the  evangelic  history.  And 
their  constant  readiness  to  seal  their  testimony  with  their 
blood  affords  the  strongest  proof  that  not  the  smallest  doub; 


113 

mingled  itself  with  their  perfect  knowledge  and  belief  of  the 
resurrection,  and  of  all  Ihe  miraculous  works  of  their  Saviour, 
on  which  their  faith  of  his  divine  mission,  and  of  the  doc- 
trine of  salvation  which  they  proclaimed  to  the  world,  was 
founded. 

If  the  preceding  reflections  are  just,  the  miracles  of  Christ 
are  coniirmed  to  us  by  an  evidence  which  ought  to  command 
our  fullest  assent.  And  if  his  miracles  are  established,  the 
divinity  of  his  mission  and  of  his  gospel,  follows  as  a  neces- 
sary consequence.* 

Having  then,  in  the  first  place,  demonstrated  this  princi- 
ple, that  our  experience  cf  the  uniformity  of  nature  does  not 
afford  any  solid  objection  against  miracles  performed  in  a 
cause  worthy  of  God  ;  we  have  seen,  in  the  next  place,  that 
if  any  supernatural  event  is  capable  of  being  confirmed  by 
human  testimony,  there  can  exist  no  reasonable  doubt  with 
regard  to  the  reality  of  the  miracles  of  the  gospel.  And  I 
must  again  repeat,  that  no  facts  in  the  compass  of  universal 
history  have  come  down  to  us  confirmed  by  such  variety, 
and  such  strength  of  evidence. 


*  Celsus,  the  most  ingenious  and  perhaps  the  bitterest  enemy  of  the  christiam 
among  the  philosophers  of  that  age,  does  not  pretend  to  deny  the  miracles  ascrib- 
td  to  Jesus  Christ,  but  seems  disposed  to  impute  ihem  to  the  powers  of  magic. 
The  science  of  modern  times  will  never  admit  such  a  solution  of  niracttioMs  pk»- 
:iomena. 

u 


This  conclusion  will  be  strengthened  when  we  proceed 
to  consider  the  rapid  extension  of  the  gospel  over  the  most 
enlightened  nations  of  the  world,  who  were,  from  their  pride, 
their  prejudices,  their  learning,  their  civil  and  religious  in- 
stitutions, and  from  all  their  ideas  and  habits,  most  hostile 
to  the  spirit  of  our  holy  religion.  It  will  be  farther  confirm- 
ed hereafter,  when  we  proceed  to  explain  the  excellence  of 
the  gospel  itself,  and  to  show  bow  worthy  it  is  of  the  origia 
which  it  claims,  and  how  far  superior  its  doctrines  are  to  any 
powers  of  invention  which  can  reasonably  be  ascribed  to 
men,  of  the  education  and  rank  in  life  of  Christ  and  the 
apostles,  supposing  them  not  to  be  inspired,  and  illuminated 
by  a  divine  spirit. 

THS    RAPID    EXTENSION    OF    THE    GOSPEL  AN   INFALLIBLE 
PROOF  OF  THE  REALITY  OF    ITS  MIRACLES. 

The  sudden  and  wide  diffusion  of  the  christian  religion 
throughout  the  principal  nations  of  the  world,  although  it  is 
usually  placed  among  the  collateral  and  presumptive  eviden* 
ces  of  the  truth  of  the  gospel  history,  may  reasonably  be 
considered  as  furnishing  a  strong  and  direct  proof  of  the  re- 
ality of  the  miracles  of  our  Saviour,  and  of  the  miraculous 
powers  with  which  the  apostles  themselves  were  endued. 
This  astonishing,  and,  indeed,  this  unparalleled  effect  was 
accomplished  by  publishing  the  miraculous  history  of  Christ, 
by  a  few  fishermea  of  Judea,  and  by  pretences,  at  least,  to 


the  same  miraculous  powers  imparted  to  tbem  by  their  Mas- 
ter. And  can  it  reasonably  be  believed  thaf  (he  story  of 
miracles  performed  in  Judea,  a  remote  and  :  espised  corner 
of  the  world,  should  have  been  received  by  the  greatesi  as 
well  as  the  most  barbarous  nalions,  in  the  circunislances  in 
which  it  was  received,  and  followed  by  the  mighty  conse- 
quences which  actually  resulted  from  it,  unless  the  heralds 
who  published  it  had  been  able  to  confirai  their  testimony 
by  the  most  palpable  deriionstrations  of  a  divine  power  ac- 
companying their  preaching  ?  On  no  other  ground  do  I  think 
we  can  propose  any  rational  solution  of  this  great  moral  phe- 
nomenon. 

Let  us  then  examine  the  greatness  of  the  effect,  and  com- 
pare it  with  the  circumstances  of  the  world  at  that  period, 
and  with  the  apparent  impotence  of  the  instruments  by 
which  it  was  produced,  and,  I  doubt  not,  this  conviction  will 
meet  us  with  almost  irresistible  force. 

We  learn  from  the  history  of  the  acts  of  the  apostles, 
which  contains,  however,  but  a  very  brief  and  partial  narra- 
tion of  their  transactions,  and  from  various  intimations  either 
more  direct  or  incidental,  given  in  the  epistles,  especially  of 
Saint  Paul,  that  the  gospel  had  spread,  within  a  very  few 
years  after  the  death  of  the  Saviour,  to  all  the  regions  of  the 
known  world,  and  in  every  country  had  made  numerous  con* 
verts.    This  representation  is  confirmed  by  the  Roman  wri- 


116 

tcrs  Trhen  any  occasion  leads  them  to  mention  tbe  numbers 
of  Christians  in  particular  districts  of  the  empire.*  Tacitus, 
speaking  of  the  cruehies  exercised  by  Nero  upon  the  Chris- 
tians, under  the  pretence  of  their  having  set  fire  to  the  city, 
says,  *'  at  first,  those  only  were  apprehended  who  confessed 
themselves  to  be  of  that  sect,  but,  through  their  means,  a 
vast  multitude  were  afterwards  discovered."  This  imperial 
villany  took  place  about  the  thirtieth  year  of  tbe  crucifixion ; 
in  which  short  period  the  gospel  had  extended  from  the  ex- 
tremities to  the  heart  of  the  Roman  empire,  and  a  vast  mul- 
iitude  of  lis  disciples  were  alreadj'  found  in  the  capital. — 
About  forty  years  posterior  to  this  event,  Pliny,  writing  to 
the  e/nperor  Trajan  for  instiuctions  in  what  manner  to  treat 
the  Christians,  who  had,  in  time  past,  been  mercilessly  drag- 
ged before  the  tribunals,  and  cruelly  puniahed,  represents  to 
liim  that  so  prevalent  had  Christianity  become  in  his  province, 
which  consisted  of  Pontus  and  Bithynia  in  the  Lesser  Asia, 
that  the  superstitiont  as  he  calls  it,  had  seized  not  only  the 
cities,  but  the  smaller  towns,  and  the  open  country.  The 
temples,  he  adds,  were  for  a  time,  almost  deserted,  the  sa- 
cred solemnities  intermitted,  and  victims  had  nearly  ceased 

*  It  is  tme  that  the  early  Roman  writers  do  not  make  frequent  or  very  particu- 
lar mention  of  the  affairs  of  the  christians.  For  Christianity  springing  up  in  Ju- 
dea,  it  was  natural  for  foreigners  to  regard  them  as  a  sect  of  the  Jews,  on  which 
account  their  history,  in  its  origin,  would  be  little  understood,  and  attract  small 
attention  at  Rome.  But  wherever  their  external  circumstances  are  noticed  by 
Roman  authors,  they  are  found  to  correspond  with  the  accounts  given  of  them  in 
christian  records. 


117 

being  purchased.*  Justin  Martyr,  who  wrote  only  a  few 
years  af(er  Pliny,  declares,  "  there  is  not  a  nation  either  of 
Greek,  or  Barbarian,  or  any  other  name,  even  of  those  who 
wander  in  tribes  and  live  in  tents,  among  whom  prayers  and 
thanksgivings  are  not  offered  to  the  Father  and  Creator  of 
the  universe  in  the  name  of  the  crucified  Jesus.'*  And 
Tertullian,  who  flourished  half  a  century  later,  after  appeal- 
ing to  the  rulers  of  the  Rotuan  empire  for  the  diflusion  of  the 
christian  religion  at  that  epoch  throughout  its  immense  ex- 
tent, enumerates  many  nations  beyond  its  limits,  as  the 
Moors,  the  Getulians,  the  Sarmatians,  the  Dacians,  the  Ger- 
mans, and  the  vScythians,  who  had  become  converts  to  the 
truth.  "  And,  saith  he,  although  we  are  so  great  a  multitude 
that,  in  almost  every  city,  we  form  the  majority  of  the  in- 
habitants, we  pass  our  time  modestly  and  in  silence."  To 
these  nations  St.  Jerom  adds  the  Indians,  the  Persians,  the 
Goths  and  the  Egyptians.  But,  not  to  multiply  quotations, 
it  is  well  known  that,  in  less  than  three  centuries,  the  whole 
Roman  world  had  become  christian. 

Having,  in  this  cursory  manner,  presented  to  your  view 
the  wide  and  rapid  extension  of  the  christian  doctrine  in  the 
first  age,  let  us,  in  the  next  place,  compare  it  with  the  feeble 
instruments  employed  in  this  great  work,  and  with  the  diffi- 
tulties  which  they  had  to  encounter,  and,  I  persuade  myself, 

*  C.  Plin.  Traj.  imp.  lib.  10.  epist.  97. 


118 

ii  will  appear  to  you  to  be  an  effect  altogefher  ont  of  the  or- 
dinary Jaws,  and  beyond  the  ordinary  powers  of  human  na- 
ture. 

Our  blessed  Saviourj  in  order  more  clearly  to  demonstrate 
his  own  immediate  agency,  and  almigh'y  power,  in  ihe  hpir- 
ituai  conqueists  achieved  by  the  doctrines  of  the  cross,  as  well 
as  to  manifest  his  infinite  grace  in  proclaiming  the  glad  tid' 
ings  of  salvation  to  the  poor,  chose  for  the  instruments  of  so 
gueat  a  work  twelve  humble  fishermen.  Circumscribed  by 
their  occupation  in  the  sphere  of  their  ideas,  little  acquainted 
with  human  nature,  ignorant  of  the  arts  and  manners  of  culti- 
vated society,  and  destitute  of  the  learning  and  talents  neces- 
sary to  command  the  attention  and  respect  of  mankind,  in  an 
age  so  polished  and  enlightened  as  that  in  which  they  lived, 
they  seemed  the  most  incompetent  of  all  men  to  effect  such 
an  Extraordinary  revolution  in  the  whole  moral  state  of  the 
world.  Exposed  to  contempt  on  account  of  their  original 
employment,  this  was  not  a  little  increased  by  the  hatred  in 
which  their  country  was  held.  For  the  Jews  were  regard- 
ed with  extreme  aversion  by  the  rest  of  mankind,  chiefly  for 
the  abhorrence  which  they  manifested  of  the  customs,  reli- 
gions, and  gods  of  all  other  nations.  And  of  all  parts  of  Ju- 
dea,  the  district  of  Galilee  from  which  they  sprung,  and  the 
town  of  Nazareth  esteemed  the  native  place  of  their  Master, 
were  viewed  with  the  greatest  disdain.  A  Galilean  and  a 
Nazarcne  were  names  of  reproach  even  at  Jerusalem.     Yet, 


119 

with  such  feeble  insfrnments,  and  in  so  short  a  period  of 
time,  did  the  ascended  Saviour,  jus<  after  he  had  exhibited 
before  the  view  of  mankind  the  most  discouraging  proofs  of 
his  own  assumed  weakness  in  the  death  to  which  he  submit- 
tal, subdue  the  wor!d  to  the  obedience  of  the  gospel,  over- 
turn the  altars  and  the  temples  of  paganism,  banish  from  their 
shrines  the  idols  with  their  priests,  change  the  moral  and  re- 
ligious systems  of  the  universe  ;  in  one  word,  overthrow,  and 
utterly  eradicate  from  the  hearts  of  men,  whatever  the  revo- 
Jution  of  ages  had  rendered  most  venerable  and  sacreJ  ia 
their  esteem  :  whatever  had  been  most  firmly  incorporated 
with  their  interests  and  their  pleasures,  or  most  deeply  in- 
trenched among  their  prejudices.  This  astonishing  revolu- 
tion, which  not  all  the  wisdom  of  their  sages,  combined  with 
all  the  power  of  their  princes,  could  have  effected,  was  the 
work  of  a  few  Galilean  fishermen,  aided  only  by  one  man  of 
eloquence  and  cultivated  talents.  And  how  was  it  effected! 
By  the  most  improbable  of  all  means  :  preaching  the  mira- 
culous history  of  a  crucified  man,  together  with  the  doctrines 
of  repentance  and  self-denial  so  revolting  to  the  corrupted 
tastes  of  human  nature.  May  I  not,  then  confidently  de- 
mand if  the  rapid  extension  of  the  religion  of  Christ  under 
the  agency  of  such  instruments,  by  the  preachinc^  of  such 
doctrines,  through  countries  so  various  and  distant,  and  so 
opposite  in  manners,  in  language,  in  political  interests,  in  re- 
ligious customs  and  ideas,  and  in  all  those  distinctive  pecu- 
)iariti««  which  divide  aud  alienate  nations  from  one  another. 


120 

does  not  contain,  in  the  greatness  and  the  extraordinary 
nature  of  the  effect,  a  demonstration  of  the  reality  of  the 
miracles  by  which  it  was  accomplished  ?  Could  obscure 
and  despised  strangers  have  carried  the  triumphs  of  the 
humble  cross  to  the  ends  of  the  earth,  and  fixed  the 
hopes  of  the  world  on  a  dying  Saviour,  unless  they  had 
borne  in  their  hands  the  credentials  of  Heaven,  and  dis- 
played to  the  senses,  and  the  inmost  convictions  of  mankind, 
the  seal  of  their  heavenly  mission  in  the  constant  operations 
of  a  divine  and  omnipotent  power  attending  their  ministry? 
Their  success  could  not  have  flowed  from  their  powers  of 
persuasion,  nor  the  force  of  their  reasonings  ;  for  they  were 
not  themselves  masters  of  eloquence  or  of  science.  But  if 
they  had  been  instructed  in  all  the  wisdom  of  the  schools, 
the  sages  of  the  pagan  world  had  long  since  found  that  the 
mass  of  mankind  are  incapable  of  entering  into  the  specula- 
tions of  philosophy.  By  philosophic  reasoning  they  had 
never  been  able  to  do  any  thing  effectual  for  the  reformation 
of  the  world.  The  apostles  simply  propounded  the  moral 
maxims,  and  divine  dogmas  of  their  great  Teacher,  confirm- 
ing them  by  the  supernatural  evidence  of  the  works  which 
he  enabled  them  to  perform.  Thus  their  doctrines  rested 
on  the  same  proofs  with  those  principles  of  natural  religion, 
which  the  Creator  has  inscribed  with  his  own  hand,  and  im- 
pressed by  his  own  power  on  the  face  of  nature,  I  mean  the 
characters  which  it  bears  of  his  omnipotence.  No  other 
even  plausible  account  can  be  given  of  a  phenomenon  unpar- 


121 

alleled  in  the  annals  of  the  world.  For,  however  reluctant 
reason  may  be  to  admit  miracles,  no  miracle  was  ever  so 
great  as  such  a  revolution  would  be,  effected  by  twelve  illit- 
erate fishermen,  without  the  immediate  co-operation  and 
aids  of  the  Holy  Spirit* 

If  we  consider  the  difficulties  and  the  apparently  insur- 
mountable obstacles  which  opposed  the  success  of  the  apos- 
tles, they  will  furnish  strong  additional  proofs  that  these  hum- 
ble ministers  of  the  Redeemer  must  have  been  endued  with 
miraculous  powers. 

I  will  not  repSat  here  those  impediments  which  naturally 
arose  out  of  the  obscurity  of  their  own  station ;  the  hatred  or 
contempt  with  which  their  nation  was  viewed ;  and  their  ut- 
ter destitution  of  all  those  talents  of  learning  and  eloquencel 
which  are  calculated  to  command  the  respect  and  admiration 
of  the  world.  Under  all  these  disadvantages,  which  were 
more  than  sufficient  to  ruin  the  success  of  men  who  were  not 
inspired  from  Heaven,  without  patronage,  without  friends^ 
without  respect  for  their  personal  attributes,  or  influence 
from  the  character  of  their  nation,  were  they  obliged  to  pass 
with  the  gospel  in  their  hands  into  the  remotest  countries, 
among  unknown  people,  ever  prone  to  receive  strangers  with 
jealousy,  or  to  look  down  upon  them  with  contemptuous  dis- 
dain. In  this  case,  their  contempt  of  these  poor  and  for- 
eign 6shermen  would  be  very  greatly  increased  by   their 

bringing  to  them  what,  to  their  apprehension,  would  be  onl^ 

16 


122 

a  Eiiraculoiis  story  of  a  crucified  man.  And  their  indigsa- 
lion  would  be  raised  to  the  highest  pitch,  when  they  fount^ 
themselves  required,  at  the  recital  of  such  a  story,  to  aban- 
don their  religion  and  their  gods,  all  the  principles  of  their 
education  and  their  habits  of  living  ;  and  whatever  the  usage 
of  their  ancestors,  for  so  many  ages,  had  rendered  sacred  to 
them,  and  incorporated  with  their  domestic  manners,  their 
religious  institutions,  and  their  national  customs. 

What  nation  ever  willingly  changes  its  gods  ?  However 
contemptible  the  idols  of  paganism  appear  to  us,  the  vulgar 
mind  w  hich  seldom  reasons,  but  usually  takes  all  its  impres- 
sions from  education,  or  from  its  natural  sympathy  with  pub- 
lic opinion,  then  regarded  them  with  that  reverence,  and 
embraced  them  with  that  full  belief  with  which  we  always 
see  the  ign3rant  receive  the  traditionary  fables  of  their  coun- 
try.  Perhaps  the  objects  of  superstition,  making  their  im- 
pression in  the  tenderest  period  of  life,  and  being  therefore, 
more  perfectly  mingled  with  the  earliest  habits  of  feeling, 
take  a  deeper  hold  upon  the  minds  of  the  common  mass  of 
mankind,  than  the  principles  of  a  more  pure  and  rational  pi- 
ety.  But  if  the  prejudices  of  the  populace  presented  almost 
insuperable  difficulties  to  the  apostles,  (be  interest  of  the  ru- 
lers presented  others,  perhaps,  still  more  formidable.  The 
religion  of  all  those  nations  was  incorporated  with  the  policy 
of  the  state.  Their  magistrates  were  their  priests.  Its  cer= 
^^Qwnies  were  blended  with  ail  the  offices  of  the  civil  go 


i23 

vcrnment.  So  ihat  the  gospel  was  obliged  to  combat,  at  the 
same  time,  with  the  blind  superstition  and  furious  bigotry  of 
the  multitude,  with  the  wealth  and  power  of  the  temples, 
and  with  the  pride  and  jealousy  of  tyrannical  rulers  armed 
with  the  sword,  who  were  afraid  of  nothing  so  much  as  of 
innovation.  We  may  safely  appeal  to  the  common  sense  o£ 
mankind  if  obstacles  like  these  must  not  have  been  utterly* 
insuperable  to  such  men  as  the  apostles,  going  out  to  the 
world  solely  in  their  own  powers  of  reasoning  and  persuasion^ 
without  the  supernatural  aid  and  the  accompanying  testimony 
of  the  Holy  Spirit  of  Truth. 

The  natural  diflSculties  of  this  great  undertaking  were  al- 
most incalculably  increased  by  the  fate  of  their  Master, 
whose  miraculous  history,  whose  life,  death,  and  resur- 
rection they  were  commanded  to  publish,  and  in  whose  name 
(hey  were  commissioned  to  preach.  Crucifixion  was  the 
most  ignominious  punishment  among  the  Romans,  reserved 
only  for  the  most  detested  criminals.  Nothing  could  shock 
the  ideas  of  such  a  people  more  than  to  elevate  io  the  rank 
of  a  divinity  a  crucified  many  the  native  of  a  remote,  depen- 
dent, and  despised  province,  who  had  suffered  like  a  male- 
factor  and  slave  for  alleged  crimes  against  the  dominant  state. 
This  circumstance  alone  was  sufficient,  according  to  the 
common  apprehensions  of  the  world,  to  blast  entirely  their 
hopes  of  success.  Of  the  magnitude  of  this  difficulty  we 
may  frame  some  conception  by  putting  an  analogous  case. 


124 

Suppose  that  a  man  of  the  lowest  extraction,  and  the  obscur" 
est  country  of  Europe,  had,  for  imputed  treasons,  been  sus* 
pended  on  a  gibbet,  or  hung  in  chains :  and  that  his  accom- 
phces,  ignorant  men,  without  talents,  and  without  character, 
should  presume  to  defj  the  government  by  declaring  that  he 
was  risen  from  the  dead,  and  that  they  were  come  in  his 
name,  and  in  contradiction  to  the  civil  authority,  to  over- 
turn all  the  religious  institutions,  and  all  the  objects  of  wor- 
ship and  veneration  in  the  christian  world,  and  such  is  the 
light  in  which  the  disciples  must  have  appeared  to  those 
proud  nations,  and  that  polished  age,  with  what  reception 
would  they  now  meet  ? 

Combining  together  then,  all  these  reflections,  and  com-» 
puting  the  result,  may  I  not  confidently  demand  of  all  rea- 
sonable and  candid  men,  who  will  fairly  estimate  the  magni- 
tude and  difficulty  of  (he  work  of  converting  a  world  in  the 
Bame  of  a  crucified  man,  who  will  consider  the  weakness, 
and  unpromising  character  of  the  instruments  by  which  it 
was  effected,  and  unite  with  both  the  astonishing  rapidity  of 
their  success,  if  the  apostles  must  not  have  been  aided  by  a 
power  infinitely  superior  to  their  own  ?  If  they  must  not  have 
carried  to  the  hearts  and  senses  of  their  hearers  the  strong- 
est conviction  of  the  truth  of  the  miracles  of  Jesus  Christ? 
and  if  they  must  not  have  supported  the  wonderful  history 
of  their  Master  by  miracles  which  they  were  themselves  en-? 
abled  to  perform :  miracles  of  no  doubtful  aspect,  but  obTi-? 


125 

oils  and  palpable,  capable  of  standing  the  most  rigorous  scru- 
tiny of  envy,  of  hatred,  of  interest,  of  every  wounded  pre- 
judice, and  of  all  the  ingenuity  which  a  learned  and  enlight- 
ened age  could  bring  to  the  investigation.  Nothing  less  can 
account  for  the  vast  and  surprising  effect  which  the  simplici- 
ty of  the  christian  doctrine,  and  of  the  primitive  ministers  of 
Christianity,  has  been  seen  to  produce.  As  miracles  appear 
to  be  the  only  power  which  could  have  given  such  a  (igpid 
extension  to  the  religion  of  Christ,  in  that  enlightened  and 
inquisitive  period,  throughout  such  various,  proud,  and  hos- 
tile nations  ;  so  the  rapidity  of  its  extension  in  the  face  of 
infinite  diflficulties,  furnishes  one  of  the  most  irresistible  evi^ 
dences  of  the  reality  of  the  miracles. 

In  order  to  account  for  the  rapid  propagation  of  the  chris- 
tian religion  without  having  recourse  to  the  ass-stance  of  mira- 
cles, some  writers  have  supposed  (hat  the  superior  reason- 
ablensss  of  the  moral  system  of  the  gospel  above  that  of  any 
of  the  popular  institutions  of  paganism  facilitated  the  success 
of  the  apostles.  For,  with  all  their  objections  against  the 
mysteries  of  Christianity,  they  are  obliged  to  acknowledge 
the  excellence  of  its  moral  code.  On  the  other  hand,  I  have 
no  hesitancy  in  pronouncing  that  merely  the  reasonableness 
of  a  religion,  or  of  any  moral  system,  never  procured  it,  in 
the  first  instance,  an  easy  and  general  reception  among  the 
mass  of  mankind.  If  it  has  not  been  incorporated  by  educa- 
tion with  their  earliest  habits  of  thinking,  it  must  claim  their 


126 

obedience  and  belief  on  some  higher  authority  than  merely 
the  conclusions  of  their  own  reason,  in  which  they  can  repose 
iitlle  confidence.  Of  this  all  the  ancient  legislators  and  re- 
formers of  nations  were  so  deeply  convinced,  that,  where 
they  had  not  visible  and  real  miracles  on  which  to  establish 
the  public  religion,  or  to  found  those  civil  institutions  by 
which  they  atteoipted  to  reduce  a  barbarous  people  to  order, 
the^  were  obliged  to  have  recourse  to  a  pretended  inter- 
course with  heaven.  If  reason  alone  were  a  competent  in« 
structor  of  the  people,  why  had  not  the  genuine  principles 
of  natural  religion  a  more  extensive  diffusion  among  the  popu- 
lace of  Greece  ?  Why  did  the  philosophers  pronounce  the 
people  incapable  of  reasoning  T  And  why  were  not  the  doc- 
trines of  their  schools  able  to  extirpate  idolatry,  or  even  tc 
throw  a  plausible  and  decent  veil  over  its  absurdities  and  inde^ 
cencies  T  If  Christianity  prevailed  in  the  first  age  by  the  force 
of  its  own  reasonableness,  why  do  we  not  see  the  same 
effects  produced  by  it  since  miracles  have  ceased  ?  Does  it 
not  still  possess  the  same  superiority  over  the  dismal  idolatry 
of  Greenland,  and  the  indecent  rites  of  India,  which  it  did 
over  the  gay  and  licentious  superstitions  of  Greece  and  Rome  ? 

Other  writers  have  thought  that  they  have  found  a  reason 
of  this  extraordinary  phenomenon  in  the  general  discredit  in- 
to which  the  objects,  and  the  rites  of  the  pagan  worship  had 
fallen  in  that  age.  Their  auguries,  their  oracles,  their  shame- 
ful and  immoral  deities,  it  is  said,  were  despised^by  their  men 


127 

of  learning,  and  had  begun  to  be  a  subject  of  ridicule  \o  the 
common  people  ;  and  Christianity  only  came  in  to  occupy  the 
room  which  they  had  left  vacant.  A  less  happy  conjecture^ 
perhaps,  could  hardly  have  been  framed.  Incredulity,  sure- 
ly, is  not  a  favourable  soil  for  the  reception  and  growth  of  r, 
new  religion.  On  the  contrary,  when  men,  in  the  progress 
of  a  sceptical  philosophy,  and  of  the  dissolution  of  the  public 
morals,  come  to  disbelieve,  and  hold  in  contempt  the  religion 
in  which  Ifaey  have  been  educated,  they  are  then  prone  to 
confound  all  religions,  and,  along  with  their  country's  godSj 
to  reject,  even  without  examination,  every  new  doctrine 
which  pretends  to  be  derived  from  heaven. 

There  are  authors  who  think  they  have  made  a  shrewd 
observation  on  human  nature,  and  the  liberal  genius  of  ancient 
manners,  were  they  ascribe  the  easy  introduction  of  chrisll- 
ani(y  into  the  Roman  empire,  to  what  has  been,  quaintly 
enough,  called  the  sociable  spirit  of  paganism. 

The  Greeks  and  Romans  believing  in  the  existence  o: 
local  deities  who  presided  over  particular  districts  and  re- 
gions of  (he  earth,  easily  granted  to  foreigners  the  privilege 
•f  introducing  their  country  gods  into  Alhens  and  Rome, 
and  performing  towards  them  their  country's  rites,  because 
it  was  icnagined  they  would  not  be  pleased  with  any  other. 
It  was  never  intended  that  these  stranger  gods  should  sup" 
J>lant  the  native  deities  of  Greece  and  Italy.     It  was  never 


123 

conceived  that  ihe  one  could  interfere  with  the  other.  ThiSr' 
however,  could  not  be  the  ground  of  any  favour  shown  to 
Christianity.  Its  worship  was  exclusive.  It  could  make  no 
compromise  with  idolatry.  The  doctrine  of  Christ,  where- 
ever  it  came,  soon  overthrew  all  the  altars  and  temples  of  pa- 
ganism, and  expelled  from  their  shrines  all  the  shameful  ob- 
jects of  an  impure  and  monstrous  worship.  This,  which  is 
the  natural  genius,  and  the  necessary  tendency  of  the  gospel. 
far  from  opening  the  way  for  its  reception  in  those  idolatrous 
nations,  would  at  once  arm  against  it  all  the  power  of  the  ma- 
gistrates, all  the  interest  of  the  priests,  and  all  the  fury  of  a 
bigoted  and  deluded  people. 

The  causes,  therefore,  which  have  been  assembled  with 
so  much  pains  in  order  to  account,  on  natural  principles,  fo*: 
the  superior  success  of  the  apostles  and  first  ministers  ofchris' 
tianity  above  its  modern  missionaries,  are  evidently  not  suffi- 
cient to  support  the  conclusions  which  have  been  attempted 
to  be  built  upon  them.  The  true  cause  of  their  astonishing 
Success  is,  that,  while  the  missionaries  can  appeal  only  to  the 
testimony  of  history,  and  the  reasonableness  and  excellence 
of  the  doctrines  which  they  preach,  the  apostles  could  appeal 
also  to  their  own  miracles,  to  the  heavenly  powers  with  which 
they  were  invested,  and  which  spoke  so  strongly  to  the  senses 
of  mankind.  These  are  the  weapons  with  which  the  disci- 
ples of  the  Saviour  subdued  the  earth  to  the  dominion  of  the 
feith.     Although  destitute  of  the  advantages  of  science,  and 


It29 

of  fbat  high  and  commanding  eloquence  which  attracts  the  ad- 
miration of  the  world.  Although  inferior  in  these  respects 
to  the  Nations  among  whom  they  travelled  preaching  Ihe  gos- 
pel ;  and  although  they  derived  no  influence  from  the  splen* 
dour  or  power  of  their  country,  yet  every  thing  yielded  be- 
fore them.  How  far  superior  to  them  in  every  human  advan- 
tage are  the  present  missionaries  of  our  holy  religion.  Do  they 
not  possess  incomparably  higher  degrees  of  science  than  the 
people  to  whom  they  are  sent  ?  And  do  they  not  go  under 
the  patronage  of  nations  regarded  in  those  distant  countries 
with  the  greatest  veneration  for  their  vast  ascendancy  over 
the  rest  of  mankind  in  arts,  and  in  arms  ?  But  they  ar^  com- 
paratively unsuccessful,  because  they  do  not  carry  with 
them,  like  the  apostles,  the  ensigns  of  heaven,  that  is,  the  de-* 
monsiralion  of  the  Spirit  in  his  miraculous  power.^ 

Experience  then,  and  reason,  both  concur  to  demonstrate 
that,  without  the  co-operation  of  miracles,  the  christian  doc- 
trine could  not  have  made  such  rapid  and  extensive  progress, 
as  we  have  seen  it  do,  through  nations  so  various,  so  distant, 
and  so  opposite  in  their  characters :  and  this  astonishing 
progress,  as  has  been  before  asserted,  affords  a  strong  con- 
firmation of  the  reality  of  the  miracles  on  which  Christ  found- 
ed his  claim  to  be  acknowledged  as  the  Son  of  God,  and  the 


*  1  Cor.  ji.  4,  5.  For  my  speech  and  my  preachiog  was  not  with  enticing  wordfl 
f  man*s  wisdom,  but  in  demonstralion  of  the  Spirit  and  of  power.  Thai  your  faith 
nuld  not.  stand  in  the  wisdom  of  men  but  in  the  power  of  God. 

17 


150 

tposlles  to  be  received  as  messengers  from  heaven.  Believe 
jne,  saith  the  Saviour, /or  the  works'*  sake.  Many  of  the 
most  wise  and  judicious  men  esfeem  the  argument  drawn 
from  this  fact  absolutely  decisive  of  the  question  concerning 
the  truth  of  Christianity  ;  and  the  inust  incredulous  must  con- 
fess that  it  creaies  a  very  powerful  presumption  in  favour  of 
the  gospel  history. 

The  writers,  who  suppose  that  the  progress  of  Christianity 
in  the  first  age  may  be  accounted  for  from  natural  causes 
alone,  affect  to  compare  it  with  the  rapid  extension  of  the 
Mahometan  imposture.  But  if  we  enter  into  a  fair  and  caii- 
did  comparison  of  the  two  cases,  the  apparent  parellelism  be- 
tween them  will  be  found  no  longer  to  exist.  We  have  al- 
ready seen  the  mild  and  pacific  means  by  which  Christiani- 
ty extended  her  gentle  sway  over  the  world.  The  estab- 
lishment of  Mahometanism  was  effected  entirely  by  the  pow- 
er of  the  sword  ;  and  its  rapid  extension  and  its  furious 
course  is  no  more  surprising  than  the  conquests  of  Zenghis, 
or  of  Timur,  or  than  any  of  those  sudden  and  violent  revolu- 
tions which  have  so  often  changed,  the  face  of  Asia,  in  dif- 
ferent ages.  The  progress  of  Christianity  has  no  parallel  in 
universal  history ;  that  of  the  koran  has,  unfortunately,  too 
many  examples.  For  it  is  as  easy  to  carry  a  new  religion 
among  an  ignorant  people  on  the  point  of  the  sword,  as  a 
mw  code  of  civil  and  pohticai  legislation^ 


131 

THE    PRETENCE  OP   CREDULITY    ALLEGED  AGAINST  THOBS 

WHO   E3IBRACED  THE    GOSPEL.        EMBRACKD  8^ 

THE  LEARNED   AS   WELL   AS  THE   VDLGAR. 

IMPOSTORS  AMONG  THE  HEATHEN. 

It  is  often  alleged  by  those  who  are  unfriendly  to  the 
christian  revelation,  that  the  credulity  of  mankind,  and  their 
love  of  the  raarveUous,  is  suflScient  to  account  for  the  pro" 
gress  of  the  gospel,  and  the  general  belief  of  its  miraciea, 
"  The  weakness  of  illiterate  followers,  they  say,  would  gree- 
dily swallow  the  pretended  wonders  of  their  Master.  They 
could  easily  riise  the  wonder-loving  spirit  of  their  hearera, 
who  would  be  ready,  without  inquiry,  either  to  adroit  their 
own  pretences  to  a  miraculous  power,  or  to  believe  the  fa- 
bled miracles  of  Christ."  By  a  few  such  general  sneers 
they  save  themselves  the  trouble  of  examining  the  evidences 
of  the  christian  revelation,  and  cast  off  from  theii'  consciences 
the  irksome  authority  of  the  christian  law. 

It  is  true  the  ignorant  in  all  countries  are  credulous  ;  and, 
in  consequence  of  this  tendency  of  mind,  they  abound  in 
narrations  of  silly  wonders.  But  is  there,  therefore,  nothing 
really  wonderful  in  the  providence  of  God  over  the  world, 
or  in  the  dispensation  of  his  mercy  to  mankind  ?  Certainly, 
every  candid  reader  will  confess  that  Jhe  miracles  of  the 
gospel  ought  not  to  be  compared  with  those  ridiculous  and 
local  prodigies  recited  in  every  district  of  every  country  by 


132 

the  vulgar ;  and  which  are  evidently  the  effecf  of  siipersti* 
tious  weakness,  or  an  enthusiastic  fervour  of  mind.     The  wri- 
tings of  the  evangelists  and  apostles  exhibit  no  marks  of  that 
imbecility  in  their  mental  powers  which  would  render  them 
liable  to  be  easily  imposed  upon  by  lying  wonders,  and  false 
appearances.     If  we  do  not  admit  that  they  were  enlightened 
by  the  Spirit  of  God,  in  which  case  no  deception  could  be 
suspected,  the  excellence  of  their  moral  system,  the  sublim- 
ity of  their  theological  doctrines,  so  superior  to  the  philoso- 
phy of  their  age,  and  the  grandeur  of  the  views  which  they 
have  opened  on  the  universe,  so  far  above  whatever  had  been 
before  conceived  by  the  human  mind  in  any  age,  demon- 
strate that  they  must  have  been  men  of  the  soundest  judg- 
ments, and  the  strongest  intellectual  faculties,  on  which  no 
fraud  could  have  been  practised,  no  attempted  imposition 
could  have  succeeded. 

That  they  were  not  parties  to  any  scheme  of  imposture, 
their  wisdom,  their  piety,  their  self-denials,  their  arduous  la- 
bours, their  continual  sufferings,  and,  finally,  their  painful, 
various,  and  voluntary  deaths  in  the  cause  of  Christ,  declare 
with  a  conviction  which,  I  think,  must  be  irresistible  to  a 
mind  that  considers  the  subject  with  fairness  and  im- 
partiality. 

I  observe,  in  the  next  place,  that  their  writings  exhibit  as 
few  characters  of  enthusiasm  as  of  weakness.     Their  histor- 


133 

ical  narrations  are  given  wlfh  a  dignified  simplicity,  their  mor- 
al instructions,  in  a  clear  and  judicious  train  of  reasoning  en- 
forced with  temperate  warmth.  We  find  in  them  none  of 
those  wild  fervours,  and  riduculous  extravagancies  which  seem 
inseparable  from  the  spirit  of  enthusiasm.  They  exhibit  all 
the  proofs,  which  writing  and  conduct  can  manifest,  of  the 
most  undesigning  sincerity  ;  and  speak  of  the  most  astonish- 
ing displays  of  divine  power  in  the  miracles  of  their  Master, 
and  their  own,  in  a  strain  of  calm  and  temperate  narration 
which  surprises  us  not  less  than  the  actions  themselves. 
They  speak  like  men  who  were  not  only  witnesses  of  the 
miracles  of  Jesus,  but  were  conscious  of  the  same  powers  in 
themselves,  and  were  familiar  with  the  works  of  omnipo- 
ience.  Neither  enthusiasm,  then,  which  deceives  itself,  nor 
imposture,  which  endeavours  to  deceive  others,  nor  a  weak 
facility  of  believing  without  evidence,  can  justly  be  imputed 
to  the  apostles.  Can  we  then  find  a  more  satisfactory  rea- 
son of  the  universal  belief  of  the  miracles  of  the  gospel  in  the 
credulity  of  the  world  ? 

The  populace  are  prone  to  listen  with  a  certain  idle  curi- 
osity, and  to  circulate  with  eagerness  among  themselves 
marvellous  tales  when  they  produce  no  other  eflfect  than 
agitating,  and  giving  play  to  their  natural  love  of  wonder. 
But,  when  they  are  to  affect  any  great  interest ;  when  the 
belief  of  them  is  conjoined  with  the  sacrifice  of  their  pas- 
sions, their  pleasures,  their  national  customs,  their  honour. 


134 

or  their  forfiine,  the  case  is  entirely  reversecl ;  then  they  are 
rereived  Hith  distrust,  and  scrutinized  with  rigour.  If,  in 
dark  and  ignorant  ages,  (he  people  are  disposed  to  listen  to 
fable^  which  seem  to  spring  out  of  the  genius  of  their  reli- 
gion, and  are  intended  only  to  stien^^then  their  favourite  su- 
perstition, they  wo(»ld  not  surely  lend  the  same  easy  faith 
to  prodi;i;ies,  real  or  pretended,  which  should  be  alleged 
only  to  overti-irn  whatever  was  held  toost  sacred  a nong  them. 
Besides,  wherever  the  gospel  name,  the  native  superstitions 
of  the  people  had  pre-occupied  their  minds.  All  their  cre- 
dulity was  aheady  enlisted  in  opposition  to  the  doctrine,  the 
history,  and  the  miracles  of  Christ.  And  in  proportion  to 
their  ignorance,  was  the  violence  with  which  they  were  at- 
tached to  silly  and  incongruous  fables,  which  were  more 
adapted  to  the  grossness  of  their  minds  than  the  pure  and 
spiritual  theology  and  morality  of  the  gospel. 

But,  whatever  declamations  men  may  think  proper  to 
make  on  the  credulity  of  the  vulgar,  the  belief  ot  the  chris- 
tian revelation  was  not  confined  to  this  class  of  society.  It 
early  numbered  aaiong  its  disciples  magistrates,  senators,  ora- 
tors, and  philosophers  of  the  highest  distinction  for  learn- 
ing and  eloquence  ;  men  who  examined  the  claims  of  the 
religion  with  the  most  painful  diligence,  and  the  most  accurate 
scrutiny ;  men  who  reluctantly  yielded  the  haughtiness  of 
office,  the  vanity  of  national  superiority,  the  pride  of  talents 
and  of  learning,  to  the  force  of  truth,  and  the  demonstrations 


135 

of  a  divine  power  accompanying  Christ  and  his  aposllct. 
ISot  to  speak  of  Joseph  of  Arimathea,  one  of  the  sanhedrioa 
of  the  Jews,  on  whose  history  some  obscnrify  rests,  it  is  cer- 
tain that  Dionysius,  a  member  of  the  celebrated  Areopagus 
of  Athena,  and  Flavins  Clemens,  a  senator  of  Rome,  suffer- 
ed martyrdom  for  Christ  in  the  very  fiist  age.  Arnoblns, 
an  early  historian  of  the  church,  assures  us  that  men  of  the 
finest  talents  and  the  greatest  learning,  orators,  grammarians, 
rhetoricians,  lawyers,  physicians,  philosophers,  abandoning 
their  former  opinions,  and  the  systems  to  which  they  had 
been  attached  by  education,  and  the  habits  of  a  philosophical 
life,  now  reposed  their  minds  only  on  the  truth  of  the  gospel. 
The  writings,  and  even  the  names  of  great  numbers  of  men 
of  letters  have  not  come  down  to  us.  A  few  only,  out  of 
multitudes,  who,  we  are  assured,  were  no  way  inferior  to 
them,  and  not  inferior  to  the  wisest  men  of  the  period  in 
which  they  lived,  have  survived  to  our  age.*  And  if  we 
were  to  select  a  philosopher  of  that  time,  most  distinguished 
for  the  splendour  of  his  talents,  the  acuteness  of  his  genius, 
and  the  vast  extent  of  his  erudition,  it  would  be  Origen,  with 


*  It  will  bcsufficIpnttonaTTK^tb?  two  Dionvsii.  one  ^f  «*hens,  the  other  of  Al- 
exandria, Quadratus,  Aristidrs,  Atiieria^o.-if.,  Ch  nifns,  Anatnliiis,  without  men- 
tioning thp  crowd  ol  the  fathers  wlio,  redeemrd  om  pnjani-m  and  'he  errois  of 
the  heathen  philosophy,  einhr^.ced  the  doctrine  of  Chri?"  vrith  zeal,  a  the  repose 
and  hope  of  their  ?ouls  Ha  ino;  the  strongest  motives  to  examine  in  o  the  fo:in- 
dations  of  that  new  :ind  di'.-ine  :«hiln«'\  liv,  thf  ir  neani^s-  to  the  evn  -  pffo'-ded 
In  the  sacred  history  afforded  them  the  amplest  means  of  ascertaiaing  their  troth. 


i3S 

whom  none  of  the  learned  men  of  his  time  deserves  to  be 
named  as  a  rival. 

Is  it  to  be  presumed,  then,  that  men  of  their  character,  and 
attainments  in  science,  enjoying,  as  they  did,  the  means  of 
the  most  minute  and  accurate  inquiry,  would  receive  on 
slight  evidence,  or,  indeed,  would  embrace,  without  the  most 
rigorous  examination,  a  new  religion  which  overturned,  and 
treated  as  folly  all  their  ancient  principles  of  philosophy  ?  Is 
there  a  shadow  of  probability  that  such  men  would  enlist 
themselves  as  disciples,  and  champions  of  this  religion,  with- 
out the  most  satisfactory  evidence  of  the  divine  authority^ 
on  which  it  rested,  and  the  deepest  convictiqn  of  its  infinite 
importance  to  mankind,  when  its  first  effect  was  to  humble 
the  pride  of  human  science,  on  which  they  had  promised 
themselves  to  build  their  glory  ;  when  instead  of  being  the 
proud  teachers  of  a  proud  philosophy,  it  turned  them  back 
to  be  the  self-denied  pupils  of  unlearned  Jews,  and  a  cruci- 
fied Saviour  ;  and  above  all,  when  it  exposed  them  to  such 
extreme  sufferings  as  no  partial  conviction,  no  doubtful  faith, 
and  no  hasty  and  immature  opinions,  could  ever  have  ena- 
bled them  to  endure  ?  Not  credulity,  surely,  but  conviction 
established  upon  the  most  solid  basis  could  have  sustained 
them  under  the  operation  of  those  severe  and  fiery  teats 
of  their  faith  to  which  it  was  constantly  subjected.  That  I 
may  place  this  point  in  as  strong  a  light  as  possible,  let  me 


137 

quote  here  a  passage  from  the  pious  and  elegant  Addison,  in 
which  it  is  presented  to  iis  with  equal  force  ot  thouglil  and 
beauty  of  expression  :  "  I  cannot  help  regarding  as  a  stand- 
ing miracle,  says  he,  that  amazing,  and  supernatural  cour- 
age, or  patience,  shown  by  innumerable  multitudes  of  mar- 
tyrs in  those  slow  and  painful  torments  that  were  inflicted  on 
them.  I  cannot  conceive  a  man  placed  in  the  burning  chair 
at  Lyons,  amid  the  insults  and  mockeries  of  a  crowded  am- 
ph. theatre,  and  still  keeping  his  seat  ;  or  stretched  upon  a 
grate  of  iron  over  coals  of  fire,  and  breathing  out  his  soul 
among  the  exquisite  sufFerings  of  such  a  tedions  execution, 
rather  than  renounce  his  religion,  or  blaspheme  his  Saviour. 
Such  trials  seem  to  me  above  the  strength  of  human  nature, 
and  able  to  overbear  duty,  reason,  faith,  conviction,  nay, 
and  the  most  absolute  certainty  of  a  futu  e  state.  Humani' 
ty,  unassisted  in  an  extraordinary  manner,  must  have  shaken 
oflf  the  present  pressure,  and  delivered  itself  out  of  such  a 
dreadful  distress  by  any  means  which  could  have  been  sug- 
gested to  it.  We  can  easily  imagine  that  many  persons,  in 
so  good  a  cause  might  have  laid  down  their  lives  at  the  gi6- 
bet,  the  stake,  or  the  block :  but,  to  expire  leisurely  among 
the  most  exquisite  tortures,  when  they  might  come  out  of 
them  even  by  a  mental  reservation,  or  a  hypocrisy  which 
was  not  without  the  possibility  of  being  followed  by  repen- 
tance and  forgiveness,  has  something  in  it  so  far  beyond  the 
Xbrce  and  natural  strength  of  mortals,  that  one  cannot  but 

18 


liiink  there  was  some  miraculous  power  to  support  the  sut* 
ferer."      Although  we  should  not  think  with   Mr.  Addison, 
thai  any  divine  aid  which  might  be  strictly  called  miraculous, 
was  communicated  to  these  pious  sufferers,  yet  must  we  ad- 
mit that  nothing  short  of  the  clearest  and  strongest  convic- 
tion of  the  truth  of  the  gospel  and  its  miracles  ;  nothing  but 
the  firmest  per&uasion  that  Christ  alone  had  the  words  of 
eternal  life^  could  have  induced  them  to  expose  themselves 
to  such  dangers,  or  supported  them  in  enduring  sach  excru- 
ciating torments.     Is  it  possible  that  philosophic  men,  what- 
ever may  be  supposed  of  the  vulgar  class  of  martyrs,  could 
bave  voluntarily  gone  to  death  surrounded  with  so  many  ter- 
rors, if  iheir  minds  had  not  been  encouraged,  animated,  and 
supported  by  the  most  complete  conviction,  founded  on  the 
strongest   and   most   rational    evidence,   that    the    doctrines 
which  they  had  embraced,  and  the  miracles  which  they  be- 
held, were  the  wisdom  of  God,  and  the  power  of  God  f 
The  least  doubtfulness,  the  smallest  apprehension  that  they 
bad  not  thoroughly  examined  the  proofs  of  that  holy  religion, 
to  which  they  were  about  to  offer  up  their  lives  amidst  such 
a  complication  of  horrors,  must  have  shaken   the  constancy 
of  their  souls.     But,  when  we  see  that  no  dangers  can  move 
them,  and  that,  in  the  midst  of  their  sufferings,  they  preserve 
their  serenity  and  firmness  unaltered,  except  when  it  rises  to 
exultation  and  triumph,  such  matchless  and  divine  heroism 
can,  surely,  never  be  the  result  of  a  weak  credulity.     Jb 


id9 

wch  tremendous  conflicts,  integrity  and  fruth  alone  can  Btis- 
tain  the  heart. 

One  important  consideration  in  the  change  of  those  learn 
€d  men,  who  embraced  chrislianilj  in  the  primitive  age,  de- 
serves to  be  particularly  remarked :  they  declare  that  ii  wai 
Hot  merely  the  purity  and  perfection  of  the  christian  faith, 
which  originally  produced  Iheir  conversion  from  pazai  ism 
and  philosophy,  but  the  miracles  which  they  saw  pertonued 
by  the  apostles  and  apostolic  men,  which  carried  with  them 
Unequivocal  deraonstration3  of  a  divine  power  attending  their 
doctrine,  and  without  which  they  would  probably  never  have 
turned  their  minds  to  an  examination  of  its  excellence. 

Some  writers  have  unaccountably  pretended  that  the  tes- 
timony of  the  christian  fathers  to  the  miracles  of  the  gospel 
ought  not  to  be  regiirdcd  as  possessing  an>'  weight  in  the 
scale  of  evidence  by  which  we  estimate  its  truth,  because  it 
is  the  testimony  of  friends  in  favour  of  their  own  system* 
But  what  made  them  christians  ?  What  created  their  attach- 
ment to  the  christian  doctrine  ?  Was  it  not  the  miracles 
they  beheld?  They  were  before  ignorant  of  its  true  nature; 
they  were  hostile  to  its  spirit,  to  the  name  of  its  Author,  and 
to  his  nation.  But  they  sacrificed  their  prejudices,  but  they 
became  disciples  of  a  religion  they  had  hated  and  despised, 
and  for  the  profession  of  it  they  exposed  themselves  to  the 


140 

Most  terrible  deaths.     Their  conversion,  then,  is  precise!/ 
that  which  gives  the  greatest  force  to  their  tesliaiony. 

To  support  the  objection  against  the  reality  of  miracles, 
which  is  founded  on  the  credulity  of  mankind,  we  are  re- 
ferred to  various  impostures  which,  at  different  periods,  have 
obtained  a  temporary  credit  and  success  in  the  world.     On 
a  few  of  those  which  have  been  most  con6dently  opposed  to 
the  miirhttf  works  performed  by  our  Saviour  and  his  apos- 
tles, J  shall,  after  offering  to  your  consideration  two  prelimi- 
nary reii.arJLS,  make  several  observations  with  the  view  of 
discriminating  them  from  the  real  operations  of  a  divine  pow- 
er.    The  first  remark  which  I  offer  is,  that,  if  pretences  to 
a  peculiar  intercourse  with  Heaven  have  been  atlempted  to 
be  maintained  by  the  additional  pretence  to  miraculous  pow- 
ers, it  is,  at  least,  a  proof  of  the  general  persuasion  of  man- 
kind, that  miracles  form    the  proper  evidence  of  a  divine 
mission.     If,  therefore,  a  real  messenger  from  Heaven  should 
ever  appear  in  the  world,  it  is  a  most  natural  and  reasonable 
expertutiun  that  he  should  be  invested  with  an  extraordina- 
ry control  over  the  cornmon  operations  of  nature  as  the  seal 
of  his  prophetic  character.     But  because  there  have  been 
religious  iuspostors,  are  theie,  therefore,  no  true  prophets  ? 
Because   there  are  empirics  in  every  liberal  profession,  are 
there  no  certain  principles  of  science?     This  can  be  the 
conclusion  only  of  ignorance  or  prejudice.     Empiricism  io 


141 

religion,  or  in  art,  should  not  make  us  deny  the  existence  of 
truth  in  both,  but  only  render  us  more  careful  and  scrupu- 
lous in  examining  the  pretensions  of  those  who  come  to  us  an 
instructors  in  either. 

I  remark,  in  the  next  place,  that,  between  the  miracles 
of  the  holy  scriptures,  and  those  mysterious  incantations, 
and  ambiguous  wonders,  performed  by  the  priests,  and  ma- 
gicians of  paganism,  which  certain  writers  have  affected  to 
bring  into  competition  with  them,  there  are  strong  and  mark- 
ed distinctions  which  ought  to  be  particularly  observed,  and 
which  are  sufficient  to  demonstrate  the  one  to  be  from  Heav- 
en, the  other  to  be  only  the  spurious  growth  of  human  arti- 
fice and  corruption. 

These  pretended  prodigies  were  commonly  exhibited  io 
some  sequestered  place  where  the  operators  had  the  oppor- 
tunity  of  preparing  whatever  means  of  deception  were  neces- 
sary for  imposing  on  the  senses.  Often  they  were  exhibited 
in  the  recesses  of  their  temples  in  the  midst  of  glooms  ren- 
dered awful  by  superstition,  and  of  fearful  images  presented 
to  an  imagination  aheady  almost  crazed  by  terror,  which  de- 
prived the  miserable  subject  of  their  art  of  all  power  of 
judging  rationally  of  the  scenes  before  him.  Nothing  was 
done  openly  and  in  public,  and  exposed  to  the  fair  and  dis- 
passionate examination  of  the  senies  of  all  men.     Their  pro- 


142 

digics  were  works  of  darkness,  secluded  from  the  observa- 
tion of  llie  world,  performed  only  on  rare  occasions,  and  af- 
ter much  artful  preparation.*  The  miracles  of  our  blessed 
Saviour,  on  the  other  hand,  were  the  ordinary  and  familiar 
actions  of  hia  Ufe.  Nothing,  as  he  says  himself,  was  done 
in  secret.  But  all  his  wonderful  works  were  performed  on 
such  subjects  as  no  slight  of  hand,  no  apparatus  for  deceiv- 
ing the  senses  could  reach  :  such  as  healing  the  sick,  open- 
ing the  eyes  of  the  blind,  restoring  the  paralytic  to  (heir  na- 
tural powers,  assuaging  the  winds  and  the  waves,  and  rais- 
ing the  dead.  Their  wonders  were  employed  lo  amuse  the 
popular  credulity,  and  to  confirm  among  the  ignorant  an  old 
Buperstilion  by  the  strange  narrations  which  the  dupes  oJ  the 
imposture  afterwards  disseminated  among  the  people.  They 
were  followed  by  no  other  consequence.  But  the  works  of 
Jesus  Christ,  by  powerfully  seizing  on  the  human  mind,  have 
been  followed  by  the  most  important  revolution  which  has 
ever  taken  place  in  the  moral  world, 

OF  SUPPOSITITIOUS  SUPERNATURAL  POWERS. 

The  pretended  powers  which,  in  various  countries,  have 
been  exhibited  by  magicians,   and  sorcerers,  and  other  men 

*  This  was  the  case  in  several  places  in  Greece,  but  particularly  in  the  tera- 
'pie  and  cave  of  Trophonius,  An  interesting  account  of  somp  of  the  scenes  of  im- 
mature exhibited  in  that  celebrated  cavern  of  superstition  will  be  found  in  the 
travels  of  Anaeharsis  the  younger  through  Greeee,  by  the  AbbS  Barthelemy, 


143 

of  ih&t  class,  have,  by  (he  enemies  of  the  christian  revela^ 
tiuri,  liinii)  8e(  in  oppusiiion  to  the  miracles  ot  our  Saviour^ 
a«  JieiDg  eiiiiiied  to  equal  authority.  By  this  arlifice,  plac- 
ing luipiwture  and  tnilh  on  the  same  ground,  they  endeav- 
our lo  weiken,  and,  at  length,  to  desti oy  the  influence  of 
the  lalierover  ihe  human  mind.  Tiie  scriptures,  ihey  say, 
pbce  them  on  an  equal  footing,  by  ascribing  the  works  of 
borh  to  supernatural  causes;  or  making  both  equally  the  ef- 
fects of  sojiie  siecret  art.  If  they  are  derived  from  supernat- 
ural influence,  by  what  criterion,  let  me  ask,  shall  we  distin- 
guish the  demoniacal  from  the  divine  ?  A  just  subject  of 
regret  it  i^,  that  many  christian  writers  have  given  too  much 
countenance  to  thi^  species  of  objection,  by  attributing  to 
demons,  and  malignant  spirits,  occasionally,  certain  mijacu- 
lous  puwers,  and  the  prescient  faculty  of  predicting  future 
events.  In  order  to  remove  the  foundation  of  this  objection 
in  which  unbelievers  have  triumphed,  I  would  lay  it  down 
as  a  maxim  necessary,  to  the  support  of  true  religion,  that 
miracles  are  exclusively  reserved  to  be  the  proofs  of  divine 
revelation,  and  can  never  be  performed  by  any  but  the  best 
of  beings,  and  for  the  most  wise,  and  beneficent  ends.  The 
ascription  of  supernatural  powers  over  the  established  order 
of  the  universe,  to  infernal  or  demoniacal  agents  is  equally 
contrary  to  reason,  to  experience,  and  to  the  sacred  scrip- 
tures, which  last,  however,  have  been  unhappily  misinter- 
preted to  support  thin  daogeroua  error. 


144 

This  subject  I  have  already  treated  in  another  work*  to 
which  1  beg  leave  to  refer  the  reader  who  may  think  the 
question  worthy  their  further  investigation.  The  decision  of 
our  Saviour  upon  it  appears  to  me  definitive  when  he  thus  ap- 
peals to  the  evidence  of  his  own  divine  mission. —  The  works 
which  the  Father  hath  given  me  to  finish^  the  same  works 
that  I  do  bear  witness  of  me,  that  the  Father  hath  sent  mc* 
If  I  do  not  the  works  of  my  Fnther,  believe  me  not. 

The  next  source  of  the  direct  evidence  for  our  holy  rell» 
gion  is  that  derived  from  the  fulfilment  of  prophecy.  But, 
as  I  have  omitted  a  discussion  concerning  demoniacal  pow- 
ers, and  the  false  miracles  supposed  to  be  drawn  from  that 
principle,  that  I  might  avoid  swelling  this  volume  to  too  large 
a  size,  I  shall,  for  the  same  reason,  omitting  the  extensive  de- 
tails which  would  naturally  arise  out  of  the  accomphshment 
of  all  the  predictions  of  the  sacred  scriptures,  confine  my- 
self only  to  two  subjects,  the  destruction  of  the  Jewish  na- 
tion, — and  the  appearance  and  character  of  the  Messiah^  the 
predictions  concerning  which  are  so  astonishing,  and  their  ac- 
complishment so  particular  and  complete,  that  they  may 
reasonably  be  esteemed  in  the  room  of  all  for  producing  en- 
tire conviction  in  the  inquisitive,  candid,  and  pious  mind. 


*  Lectures  on  the  evidences  of  religion  to  the  Senior  Class  in  the  College  of 
New-Jersey. 


145 

Sufl[°er  me,  then,  to  direct  the  attention  of  the  reader,  in 
the  first  place,  to  that  most  wonderful  prediction  concerning 
the  fate  and  destinies  of  the  nation  of  Israel,  uttered  by  Mo- 
ses, their  divine  legislator,  near  the  close  of  his  life. 

THE     PROPHECY    OF     MOSES    CONCERNING     THE    FINAL    DE- 
STRUCTION   OF    THE    JEWISH  NATION. 

At  that  period  when  the  devout  and  pious  mind  often  be- 
comes prophetic,  the  illapse  of  the  divine  Spirit  on  him  ap- 
pears to  have  been  unusually  clear  and  strong.     After  pro- 
posing to  this  people  the  highest  motives  to  duty,  and  mul- 
tiplying to  them  the  most  gracious  promises  of  prosperity  if 
they  should  continue  obedient  to  the  laws  which  God  had 
given  them  by  him,   he  carries  his  view  far  forward  into  fu- 
ture ages,  and,  foreseeing  the  general  defection  of  the  nation 
from  the  true  spirit  of  their  religion,  he  denounces  the  most 
fearful  judgments  of  heaven  upon  their  disobedience  and  im- 
piety.    And  then,  tracing  their  destinies  to  the  end  of  time, 
he  delineates  them  with  such  clearness  and  circumstantial  ex- 
actness, that,  if  we  may  judge  of  the  future  by  the  past  for 
mope  than  three  thousand  years,  he  seems  to  present  a  his- 
tory rather  than  a  prophecy.     So  terrible  are  these  denun- 
ciations that  nothing  but  the  strongest  sense  of  duty,  and  the 
most  submissive  obedience  to  the  command  of  God,  could 
have  extorted  them  from  the  legislator,  and  father  of  his  peo^ 

pie  :  and  so  peculiar  are  these  destines  that  nothing  but  that 
19 


14-6 

bfinife  prescience,  which  embraces  all  things,  from  the  be- 
ginning to  the  end,  under  one  view,  could  have  declared 
them  so  many  ages  before  they  existed. 

The  prophecy  to  which  I  refer  is  contained  in  the  twenty- 
eighth  and  thirtieth  chapters  of  the  book  of  Deuteronomy* 
I  shall  recite  only  such  portions  of  it  as  are  necessary  to  the 
object  of  the  present  lecture,  which  is  to  point  out  the  final 
extinction  of  the  civil  government,  and  national  existence  of 
the  Jews  ;  the  miseries  which  accompanied  their  political 
death  ;  and  their  consequent,  and  confinued  dispersion  among 
all  the  nations  of  the  world.  "  The  Lord  shall  bring  a  na- 
tion  against  thee  from  afar,  from  the  end  of  the  earth,  as  swift 
as  the  eagle  that  ilieth;  a  nation  whose  tongue  thou  shalt  not 
understand  ;  a  nation  of  fierce  countenance,  which  shall  not 
regard  the  person  of  the  old,  nor  show  favour  to  the  young.^ 
And  he  shall  besiege  thee  in  all  thy  gates,  until  thy  high 
and  fenced  walls  come  down  wherein  thou  trustedst,  through- 
out all  thy  land.  And  thou  shalt  eat  the  fruit  of  thine  own 
body,  the  flesh  of  thy  sons,  and  of  thy  daughters  in  the  siege^ 
and  in  the  straitness  wherewith  thine  enemies  shall  distress 
thee  ;  so  that  the  man  who  is  tender  among  you,  and  very 
delicate,  his  eye  shall  be  evil  toward  his  brother,  and  toward 
the  wife  of  his  bosom,  and  toward  the  reninant  of  the  chil- 
dren that  he  shall  leave ;  so  that  he  shall  not  give  to  any  of 

*  &c.  Gh.  23.  V.  52, 


ur 

them  of  the  flesli  of  his  children  which  he  shall  eat ;  because 
he  shall  have  nothing  left  him  in  the  siege,  and  in  the  strait* 
ness  wherewith  thine  enemies  shall  distress  thee  in  all  thy 
gates.  The  tender  and  delicate  woman  among  you,  who 
Would  not  adventure  to  set  the  sole  of  her  foot  upon  the 
.ground  for  delicafeness  and  tenderness,  her  eye  shall  be  evil 
toward  the  husband  of  her  bosom,  and  toward  her  son,  and 
toward  her  daughter,  and  toward  her  young  int\»nt,  even  to- 
ward her  children  which  she  shall  bear :  for  she  shall  eat 
them  for  want  of  all  things,  secretly,  in  the  siege  and  strait- 
ness  wherewith  thine  enemies  shall  distress  thee  in  all  thy 
gates.*  And  it  shall  come  to  pass  that  ye  shall  be  plucked 
from  off  the  land  whither  thou  goest  to  possess  it.  And  the 
Lord  shall  scatter  thee  among  all  people  from  one  end  of 
the  earth,  even  to  tlie  otiier.  And  among  these  nations  shalt 
Ihou  find  no  ease ;  neither  shall  the  sole  of  thy  foot  have 
rest.f  And  it  shall  come  to  pass,  when  all  these  things  are 
come  upon  thee,  the  blessing,  and  the  curse,  which  I  have 
Bet  before  thee,  and  thou  shalt  call  them  to  mind  among  all 
the  nations  whither  the  Lord  thy  God  hath  driven  thee,  and 
shalt  return  unto  the  Lord  thy  God,  and  shalt  obey  his  voice 
according  to  all  that  I  command  thee  this  day,  thou  and  thy 
children,  with  all  thine  heart,  and  with  all  thy  soul ;  that 
then  the  Lord  thy  God  will  turn  thy  captivity,  and  hav« 

* Ch.  28.  V.  63.  ^c.  t  Cb.  30.  v.  1-3, 


/ 


148 

(Compassion  upon  thee,  and  will  return  and  gather  thee  from 
all  the  nations  whither  the  Lord  thy  God  hath  scattered 
thee.'* 

Every  thing  in  this  prophecy  is  astonishing ;  and  if  we 
seriously  and  attentively  consider  it  in  all  its  parts,  it  carries 
with  it  irrefragable  evidence  of  its  having  been  dictated  by 
the  omniscient  Spirit  of  God.  The  miniiteGess  and  accu- 
racy of  the  detail  is  hardly  exceeded  by  the  history  of  the 
events.  The  events  themselves  are  so  singular  and  unex- 
ampled, that  a  pretended  prophet,  vending  only  probable 
conjectures,  or  ambiguous  oracles,  for  prophecy,  never 
would  have  conceived,  or  ventured  to  utter  them.  And  if 
he  had  been  so  bold,  there  are  infinite  chances  against  one 
that  words  thrown  out  in  random  gii^sses  should  never  coin- 
cide with  the  current  of  future  history.  That  a  nation,  in 
a  course  of  time,  should  degenerate  from  her  primitive  man- 
ners, and,  at  length,  be  subjugated  by  some  powerful  con- 
queror, is  an  event  so  much  in  the  order  of  nature,  that  it 
requires  no  great  portion  of  political  sagacity  to  predict  it 
in  general  terms.  But  who  could  foresee  at  so  great  a  dis- 
tance, that  the  Jews  would  perish  precisely  in  such  a  man- 
ner; that  their  sieges  would  be  so  dreadful ;  that  the  rem- 
nant, who  should  escape  the  famine  and  the  sword,  should 
be  dispersed  through  all  nations,  where,  renewing  their  num- 
bers, they  should  still  continue,  a  distinct  people,  and  capa- 
ble, on  their  repentance,  of  being  again  restored  to  a  national 


14« 

and  independent  state  in  their  own  land  ?  This  is  surelj  the 
foresight  of  inspiration. 

The  people  of  Israel  were  under  a  peculiar  providence. 
While  they  continued  obedient  to  the  law  of  God  given  them 
by  Moses,  they  enjoyed  distinguished  temporal  happiness 
and  prosperity.  But  their  departures  from  the  law  of  their 
God,  their  idolatries,  and  their  general  defection  to  immoral- 
ity and  impiety  were  always  punished  with  marked  and  severe 
chastisements.  And  it  was  announced  to  them  that,  when 
these  temporary  inflictions  should  fail  to  produce  the  feflfectual 
correction  and  reformation  of  their  manners,  the  judgments  of 
heaven  should  fall  upon  them  with  more  dreadful  severity; 
that,  after  suffering  all  the  most  grievous  calamities  of  war,  the 
miserable  remnants  of  the  sword  should  be  exiled  from  their 
desolated  country,  and  scattered  as  vagabonds  over  the  whole 
earth,  being  subjected  to  every  privation  and  indignity,  till 
the  appointed  period,  for  the  expiation  of  their  sins,  should 
bring  them  to  repentance,  and  open  the  way  for  their  resto- 
ration to  their  own  land. 

Let  us  now  see  how  literally  these  denunciations  have  been 
verified ;  especially,  at  two  great  epochas,  the  Babylonish 
captivity ;  and  the  destruction  of  Jerusalem,  and  dispersion 
of  the  Jews,  under  the  Roman  emperor  Vespasian.  In  the 
siege  which  preceded  both  the  one  captivity,  and  the  other, 
this  people  suffered  almost  unheard  of  calamities.     As  their 


150 

privilesfes  had  been  greater  than  those  of  other  nations,  their 
iniquities  seeru  to  have  risen  in  the  same  proportion.  Having 
rejected  with  scorn  the  warnings  of  those  divine  messen- 
gers sent  to  them  by  God,  they  appear  to  have  been  aban- 
doned by  \um  to  an  infatuated  mind,  agitated  l3y  the  most  fe- 
rocious passions.  Their  miseries,  instead  of  hnn>bling  their 
pride,  or  cahning  their  madness,  ren(iered  Ihem  only  more  fu- 
rious ;  and  their  enemies  them  elves,  in  the  midst  of  fire  and 
•slaughter,  sometimes  loolied  on  theui  with  commiseration  and 
astonishment  as  a  people  marked  out  for  the  peculiar  ven- 
geance of  heaven.  And  (he  recital  of  their  sufferings,  parti- 
cularly in  the  destruction  of  their  city  by  the  Romans,*  which 
geeras  to  have  been  chiefly  in  the  view  of  their  prophetic 
legislator,  is  perhaps  witliout  a  parallel  in  the  history  of  hu- 
man misery. 

And  he  shall  besiege  thee  in  all  thy  gates,  continues  the 
prophecy,  until  thy  high  and  fenced  walls  come  down 
wherein  thou  tnistedst,  througliout  all  thy  land.  And  it  de- 
serves to  be  remarked  of  the  Jewish  nation,  more,  perhaps, 
than  of  any  other,  that  their  calamities  have  been  the  conse* 

*  The  description  of  the  conquering  nation  carries  in  it  a  striking  application 
to  the  Romans.  The  Lord  xhall  bring  a  nation  against  Oiee  from  afar,  from  the 
END  OF  TH  e  EARTH,  OS  swift  OS  ail  eugU  tkatflieth  ;  a  nation  rvhose  tongce  thou  shall 
not' UNDERSTAND,  &c.  The  language  of  Chaldea  was  not  so  unintellible  to  the 
Hebrews  as  that  of  the  Romans  j  nor  was  Babylon  so  distant  from  Jerusalem  as 
Rome. 


151 

qaencf^,  not  so  much  of  unfortunate  conflicts  in  the  open  field, 
as  of  desj)eiale  and  disastrous  sieges,  in  which,  the  greater 
portion  of  the  people,  being  shut  up  within  their  walls,  suf- 
fercil  whatever  famine  and  civil  discord,  inflamed  by  the 
most  furious  and  fanatical  passions,  not  less  than  the  sword  of 
the  enemy,  could  inflict  upon  the  most  miserable  of  mankind. 
The  history  of  the  miseries  which  they  suffered  in  the  re- 
spective sieges  is  calculated  to  inspire  us  with  horror,  and 
perfectly  accords  with  the  strong  painting  of  the  prophecy. 
Passing  over  the  destruction  of  their  city,  and  the  captivity 
of  their  nation  1)y  Nebuchadnezzar  king  of  Babylon,  I  shall 
only  present  you  with  a  brief  sketch  of  their  last  overthrow, 
the  most  fearful  scene  of  their  calamities,  in  the  famous  siege 
of  Jerusalem  by  Titus,  the  son,  and  lieutenant  of  Vespasian. 
The  materials  of  this  representation  I  draw  entirely  from 
Josephus,  himself  a  Jew,  and  cotemporary  with  the  transac- 
tions which  he  relates,  who  could  have  no  motive  to  exagger- 
ate the  madness,  and  the  atrocious  passions  of  his  own  coun^- 
try  men. 

In  the  various  towns  of  Judea  besieged  and  taken  by 
the  Romans  during  this  desolating  and  exterminating  war, 
theii  furious  and  exasperated  soldiers  cut  ofT  the  whole  pop- 
ulation without  respecting  either  age  or  sex.  They  show- 
ed themselves,  in  the  words  of  Moses,  to  be  a  nation  of  a 
fierce  countenanre,  rendered  more  ferocious  by  the  fury  with 
which  they  were  opposed,  who  regarded  not  the  person  of 


152 

the  oldy  nor  showed  favour  to  the  young.  But  it  was  in  the 
siege  of  Jerusalem  itself  that  the  uieasure  of  the  calamities  of 
the  Jews  became  full  Pressed  from  without  by  all  the  arts 
of  war,  and  cut  off  entirely  from  supplies  of  provisions,  it  was 
difficult  to  say  whether  hunger,  or  the  sword  destroyed  the 
greater  numbers.  Their  distresses  were  doubly  aggravated 
by  their  own  internal  dissentions.  Divided  into  most  violent 
factions  by  ambitious  or  enthusiastic  leaders,  they  often  fill- 
ed the  streets  of  Jerusalem  with  mutual  slaughter.  Often 
they  only  suspended  their  own  conflicts  for  a  short  season  to 
run  to  their  walls  to  resist  the  assaults  of  the  common  enemy , 
and  returned  from  repulsing  them  to  butcher  one  another. 
It  seemed  as  i^  heaven  had  smitten  the  murderers  of  the  Sa- 
viour of  the  world  with  a  desperate  phrenzy,  and  given  them 
up  to  the  dominion  of  the  most  diabolical  passions.  In  the 
midst  of  all  these  horrors,  famine  presents  us  with  a  spectacle 
still  more  horrible,  when  we  see  them,  driven  by  the  rage  of 
hunger,  with  cannibal  appetite,  to  devour  one  another,  and 
the  living  feeding  on  those  who  had  died  of  disease,  or  of 
wounds.  Even  mothers,  quenching  all  the  sentiments  of  na- 
ture, devoured  their  own  children,  and  grudging  to  their 
husbands,  and  their  other  children  a  share  in  this  dreadful 
repast,  they  endeavoured,  after  having  satisfied  the  present 
cravings  of  their  own  hunger,  to  conceal  the  remaining  frag- 
ments from  the  voracious  rapacity  of  the  rest  of  the  family, 
reserving  them  as  a  precious  morsel  against  another  time. 
With  what  fearful  accuracy  has  the  prediction  of  Moses  been 


153 

fulfilled  !  "  And  thou  slialt  eat  the  fruit  of  thine  own  body, 
the  flesh  of  thy  sons,  and  thy  daughters,  in  the  siege,  and  in 
the  straitness  wherewith  thine  enemies  shall  distress  Ihee ; 
so  that  the  man  who  is  tender  among  you  and  very  delicate,*' 
his  eye  shall  be  evil  toward  his  brother,  and  toward  the  wife 
of  his  bosom,  and  toward  the  remnant  of  the  children  that 
he  shall  leave,  so  that  he  shall  not  give  to  any  of  tliem  of 
the  flesh  of  his  children  which  he  shall  eat.  The  tender 
and  delicate  woman  among  you,  who  would  not  venture  to 
set  the  sole  of  her  foot  upon  the  ground  for  delicateness,  and 
tenderness,  her  eye  shall  be  evil  toward  the  husband  of  her 
bosom,  and  toward  her  son,  and  toward  her  daughter,  and 
toward  her  young  infant,  even  toward  her  children  that  she 
shall  bear  ;  for  she  shall  eat  them  for  want  of  all  things,  se- 
cretly, in  the  siege." 

One  example,  out  of  many  of  the  same  kind,  let  me  pro- 
duce to  show  the  frantic  despair  with  which  this  devoted 
people  hastened  their  own  destruction.  After  the  storming 
of  Jerusalem,  a  wretched  remnant  of  the  citizens  sought  ref- 
uge in  the  castle  of  Massada :  but  being  pressed  by  the  Ro- 
mans, they,  at  the  instigation  of  one  of  their  leaders,  first 
murdered  their  wives  and  children :  they  then  chose  by  lot 


*  That  is,  who  has  been  most  softly  and  luxuriously  bred,  and  accustomed  to 
the  choicest  viands,  he  shall  now  be  reduced  to  these  wretched  and  horrible 
meals.  And  even  of  these  he  shall  grudge  the  smallest  share  to  those  who  were 
ince  most  dear  to  hitn,  when  the  furious  raj^e  of  hnnjer  had  not  perverted  all  his 
^ertions. 

20 


154 

ten  who  should  murder  all  the  rest ;  after  which  one  of  the 
ten  was  chosen  to  murder  the  other  nine  ;  who,  when  he  had 
executed  this  dreadful  oflSce,  slabbed  himself.  In  this  man- 
ner perished  nine  hundred  and  sixty  persons  in  this  single 
fortress.*'  And,  in  the  whole  war  there  were  destroyed  by 
the  Romans,  by  famine,  and  by  their  own  hands,  upwards 
of  twelve  hundred  thousand  persons,  besides  nearly  one  hun- 
dred thousand  who  were  taken  prisoners  and  sold  for  slaves,^ 
Of  these  prisoners  so  little  care  was  taken,  that  eleven  thou- 
sand was  literally  starved  to  death  ;  and,  of  the  reraaindei-j 
the  greater  portion  were  sent  as  slaves  to  Egypt,  agreeably 
to  another  part  of  the  same  prophecy  :  "  And  the  Lord  shall 
bring  thee  into  Egypt  with  ships^  and  there  ye  shall  be  sold 
to  3'our  enemies  for  bond  men,  and  band  women  ;  and  no 
man  shall  buy  you. "J  In  such  numbers  shall  you  be  brought 
to  the  market,  that  purchasers,  at  length,  will  no  longer  be 
found. 

*  Jos.  de.  bell.  Jud.  lib.  7.  cap.  8,  9. 

f  Accurately,  according  to  Josephus,  the  dead  were  1,240,490 ;  and  the  prisoa- 
ers  99,200. 

X  Ch.  28.  V.  63.  The  Lord  shall  bring  thee  into  Egypt  nith  ships.  The  people 
cf  Israel  came  out  of  Egypt  by  the  isthmus  of  Suez,  and  the  desert.  And  by  that 
route  they  usually  travelled  and  traded  to  that  country.  But  it  was  more  conve- 
nient for  the  Romans  to  put  their  numerous  slaves  on  board  the  ships  belonging  tc 
their  fleet,  or  on  board  Pheniciau  meichant  vessel:?,  to  transport  them  into  Egypt. 
As  this  was  a  mode  of  communication  rot  practised  in  the  time  of  Moses,  and 
commerce  was  in  a  great  measure  interdicted  to  the  Israelites  by  their  institutions^, 
this  circumstance  renders  this  part  of  the  propecy  tlie  more  surprising,  and  worthy 
c\ir  attention .-  that  tkey  should  come,  into  Egypt  in  ihips. 


155 

So  conformable  was  this  disastrous  termination  of  the 
Jewish  state,  and  destruction  of  the  holy  city,  to  the  pre- 
dictions both  of  Moses,  and  of  our  Lord  and  Saviour  Jesus 
Christ  :  For,  then,  there  shall  be  great  tribulation,  saith 
Christ,  "  such  as  was  not  from  the  beginning  of  the  world  to 
(his  time,  no  nor  ever  shall  be  ;  and  except  those  days  should 
be  shortened,  there  should  no  flesh  be  saved,"* 

Let  us  pursue  the  prophecy  farther :  "  And  it  shall  come 
to  pass  that  ye  shall  be  plucked  from  off  the  land  whither 
thou  goest  to  possess  it.  And  the  Lord  shall  scatter  thee 
among  all  people,  from  one  end  of  the  earth  even  to  the 
other.  And  among  these  nations  shalt  thou  find  no  ease, 
neither  shall  the  sole  of  thy  foot  have  rest.  Here  is  a  new 
series  of  wonders.  That  a  nation  should  be  conquered, 
that  it  should  be  reduced  to  subjection,  that  it  should  be 
wholly  exterminated  by  some  barbarous  conqueror,  would 
Bot  be  so  extraordinary  ;  because  the  history  of  the  world 
affords  numerous  examples  of  similar  events.  But,  that  a 
whole  people  should  be  plucked  from  off  their  land,  should 
be  dispersed  in  broken  fragments  through  all  the  nations  of 
the  world,  and  yet  neither  be  blended  with  those  nations, 
iwr  become  extinct,  is  a  catastrophe  so  singular,  a  state  so 
unprecedented,   that  a  prophet  who  was  not  uttering  a  pre- 


*  Mat.  xxu-  21 ,  22.    See  the  pradiction  of  our  Saviour  beautifully  illuBtrated  hp 
fcisbop  Porieas  in  his  lecture  upon  this  chapter. 


lott 

diction  dictated  by  the  divine  Spirit,  an  historian  who 
should  have  been  only  hazarding  a  conjecture  or  a  random 
oracle,  never  would  have  thought  of  one  which  no  fact  in 
history  ever  could  have  suggested,  which  no  experience  of 
the  revolutions  of  nations  ever  could  have  warranted.  If,  in 
the  infinite  combinations  of  the  operations  of  providence,  an 
oracle,  in  a  long  course  of  time,  might  accidentally  hit  upon 
one  corresponding  event,  is  it  within  the  compass  of  possi- 
bility that  either  random  conjecture,  or  the  most  sagacious 
buman  foresight,  should  be  able  to  foretel,  and  accurately  to 
point  out,  such  a  united  series  of  facts,  continued  down 
through  such  a  long  succession  of  ages  ?  The  man,  who  can 
receive  this  as  either  probable  or  possible,  must  have  a  great 
facility  of  believing  indeed.  Do  we  not,  then,  see  the  Jew- 
ish nation  plucked  from  off  their  own  land  ?  Do  we  not  see 
them  scattered  among  all  people  from  one  end  of  the  earth 
even  unto  the  other  .^  And  is  it  not  true  that,  among  all  these 
nations  they  find  no  ease  ;  neither  is  there  rest  for  the  sole 
of  their  foot  ?  Perpetually  they  have  been  persecuted,  in- 
sulted, pillaged,  and  refused  all  the  common  privileges  of 
citizenship.  In  every  country  we  have  seen  them  alter- 
nately banished  and  recalled ;  and  recalled  only  to  be  pillag- 
ed, or  banished  again.  The  whole  history  of  that  afflicted 
people  since  their  dispersion  confirms  the  words  of  their 
great  prophet :  that  they  should  become  an  astonishment^ 
a  proverb,  and  a  byeword  among  all  nations  J'^'     Thai  their 

^  Deut  xxviii.  37. 


157 

plagues  should  he  wonderful,  even  great  j)?a^i/£.s'  and  of 
long  continuance.'^ 

A  circumstance  not  a  little  singular,  which  has  contribut- 
ed more  than  all  others  both  to  their  dispersion,  and  to  the 
injuries  which  they  have  suffered,  is  that,  in  almost  all  coun- 
tries, thej  have  been  denied  the  privilege  of  holding  landed 
property.  This  has  induced  a  necessity,  contrary  to  the 
original  habits  of  the  nation,  to  turn  their  attention  to  com- 
merce, and  to  the  discount,  and  exchange  of  money  in  differ- 
ent forms.  Hence  has  resulted  the  further  necessity  of  dis- 
tributing them  as  traders,  and  brokers  or  bankers,  into  vari- 
ous nations.  Their  wealth,  accumulated  by  these  means, 
excited  both  the  envy  of  the  people,  and  the  avarice  of  their 
rulers,  and  pointed  tliem  out  as  an  easy  prey  to  violent  and 
arbitrary  princes,  whenever  the  public  coffers  were  empty. 
The  extreme  uncertainty  of  their  state  tempted  them  to  de- 
mand usurious  interest  in  their  contracts  for  money  lending. 
Hence  the  public  hatred,  in  every  country  was  inflamed 
against  them,  and  justified,  in  the  public  esteem,  the  rapaci- 
ty and  violence  of  the  princes  who  oppressed  them.  A  thou- 
sand wicked  and  malicious  tales  were  fabricated  against 
them.  A  thousand  crimes  were  imputed  to  them  ;  and 
they  were  often  given  up  to  the  fanatical  rage  of  the  popu- 
lace. Thus  has  their  character  been  in  a  great  measure  for- 
med by  their  state,  and  their  persecutions  have  often  sprung 

*  Deut.  Y.  69, 


158 

out  of  iheir  character.  This,  together  with  the  barbarous  su- 
perstitions and  the  barbarous  forms  of  civil  government  which, 
for  many  ages  disgraced  Europe,  completed  their  misery. 

On  a  review  of  this  history,  may  I  not  justly  demand 
r^^'ain,  who  could  have  foreseen  national  characteristics,  and 
situations  so  uncommon,  so  singular :  circuaistances  so  vari- 
ous and  complicated,  destined  to  take  place  in  snch  remote 
ages,  but  the  Spirit  of  God  alone  ?  In  order  to  evade  the  al- 
most irresistible  evidence  of  this  conclusion,  we  have  seen 
infidel  writers  resort  lo  the  ridiculous  subterfuge  of  saying 
(hat  the  verification  of  the  prediction  is  (o  be  ascribed  to  the 
christians  who  have  ingeniously  contrived  to  give  authentici- 
ty to  their  o.vn  scriptures,  by  promoting  the  fulfilment  of 
their  prophecies.  But  have  not  these  prophecies  been  ful- 
filled under  the  dominion  of  pagan  and  mahometan  nations, 
as  well  as  of  the  christian  ?  If  the  allegation,  however,  were 
well  founded,  whence  could  Moses  have  foreseen  the  exis- 
tence of  the  christian  religion,  and  the  interest  which  the 
christians,  as  a  sect,  would  have  in  giving  effect  to  his  own 
prophecy  ?  Whence  could  he  have  foreseen  those  commer- 
cial, polilical,  moral,  and  religious  institutions,  which,  by 
their  influence  on  the  character  of  the  nations  who  should 
embrace  Christianity,  would  thus  cruelly  affect  the  condition 
of  the  Jews  ?  Surely,  if  men  were  not  blinded  by  their  pre- 
judices, they  would  see  that  the  wonder  here,  is  not  in  the 
least  diminished  by  this  absurd  suppositiono 


159 

With  equal  folly  and  ignorance  it  has  been  alleged  that 
this  prediction  was  composed  by  Ezra,  or  some  of  his  coun- 
trymen, after  the  return  of  the  Jews  from  the  Babylonish 
captivity  ;  that  it  has  a  relation  solely  to  that  event ;  and 
that  hence  alone  we  must  account  for  the  very  circumsfan* 
tial  narration  of  several  particulars  during  the  siege,  and  the 
exact  dehneation  of  the  consequent  state  of  the  action. 

Men  who  undertake  to  write  and  pronounce  upon  the  sub- 
ject of  religion,  without  the  trouble  of  candidly  inquiring  in- 
to its  truth,  seem  to  think  themselves  entitled  to  make,  with- 
out shame  or  compunction,  the  most  extravagant  and  improb- 
able assertions.  This  allegation  is  demonstrated  to  be  utter- 
ly  impossible  by  reference  only  to  the  Samaritan  copy  of  the 
pentateuch.*     This  ancient  book,  which  contains  the  whole 


*  Ten  tribes  of  the  people  of  Israel  withdrew  themselves  from  the  govern- 
ment of  the  house  of  Solomon  under  the  reign  of  Rehoboam  In  their  sepa- 
ration they  still  professed  to  adhere  to  the  law  of  Moses,  which  had  been 
common  to  the  whole  nation.  The  five  books,  therefore,  which  were  written 
by  him,  and  which  contained  his  wliole  law,  they  preserved  with  no  less  veo- 
cration  than  did  the  Jews.  When  tlie  ten  tribes  were  led  into  captivity  by 
the  kings  of  Babylon,  they  were  replaced  by  a  new  and  mixed  race  called 
Samaritans,  from  the  name  of  their  capital  city  Samaria.  These  people  re- 
Bidint;  in  the  land  of  Israel,  and  mixing  with  the  remnant  of  it^  former  in- 
habitants, still  received  the  law  of  Moses  as  Uicir  civil  and  reli  ious  code; 
but  admitted  none  of  the  writings  of  the  Jewish  prophets.  Perpetual  hatreds, 
and  a  most  hostile  spirit,  always  existed  between  the  revolted  trib  s  first,  and 
afterwards  the  Samaritans,  and  the  people  of  the  Jews.  Both  nations  pre- 
served the  law  of  Moses  with  the  same  sacredness.  The  langiiage  is  the  same. 
But  the  Jewish  copy  of  the  law  is  written  in  the  Clialdee  character,  which 
became  familiar  to  the  Jews  during  their  captivity  at  Babylon  ;  the  Samaritan 
i?  written  in  the  old  Hebrew,  or  Pheuician  letter,  which  was  comuion  to  ibt. 


160 

law  of  Moses,  was  continually  read  in  the  religions  assem- 
blies of  that  people,  so  hostile  to  the  Jews,  during  a  period 
of  four  hundred  jears  anterior  to  the  capture  of  Jerusalem 
by  the  king  of  Babylon,  and  still  longer  before  the  age  of 
Ezra,  and  the  copy  of  the  scriptures  collected  by  that  emi- 
nent scribe.  Here,  then,  is  a  copy  of  the  iMosaic  Law,  re- 
tained in  the  hands  of  rivals  and  of  enemies,  which  renders 
it  of  the  more  unsuspected  credit,  that  demonstrates  the  ex- 
istence of  the  prophecy  several  centuries  before  the  era  of 
the  Babylonish  captivity.  But  the  prophecy  contains  the 
evidence  within  itself  that  its  principal  reference  is  to  the  Ro- 
man conquest,  and  to  the  state  of  the  Jews  since  that  period, 
it  is  a  miracle,  then,  continually  presented  to  your  eyes  :  it 
is  a  prophecy  every  day  fulfilling  in  your  sight  after  a  lapse 
of  more  than  three  thousand  years. 

PROPHECIES  CONCERNING  THE  MESSIAH. 

No  evidence  for  the  truth  of  the  Christian  revelation,  de- 
rived from  the  predictions  of  the  holy  scriptures,  appears  to 
me  more  clear  and  strong  than  that  which  results  from  that 
stream  of  prophecy  concerning  a  future  Messiah ;   which. 


ahole  nation  before  the  captivity.  This  is  that  which  is  called  the  Samari- 
♦aa  pentateuch.  And  this  old  letter,  in  which  the  law  is  preserved  by  them, 
is  another  proof  of  the  antiquity  of  the  Samaritan  copy.  It  is  doubtless  the 
letter  which  Moses  himself  used,  and  communicated  to  the  people  of  Israel. 
And  the  Jews  changed  it,  in  their  copies  of  the  law  after  the  captivity,  for 
the  Chaldee,  only  because  the  latter,  by  a  long  residence  in  Babylon,  had 
become  more  familiar  to  them. 


161 

eoramencing  with  the  earliest  pencils  of  time,  terminates,  at 
length,  in  Jesus  Christ.  We  trace  it  from  Adam,  in  that 
mystical  promise,  the  seed  of  the  woman  shall  bruise  the  set' 
penVs  heady  down  through  the  line  of  patriarchs  and  prophets 
to  the  time  o(  Christ  himself,  in  whom  all  the  prophecies,  and 
types  of  the  ancient  dispensations  have  been  completed,  and 
the  expectations  of  the  whole  world  fulfilled.  For,  it  is  a 
circumstance  particularly  deserving  your  attention,  that  there 
was  no  ci\ilized  nation  of  antiquity,  in  which  were  not  found 
traditions  concerning  a  divine  personage  who  should  appear 
upon  earth  to  teach  men  the  true  knowledge  of  God,  their 
duties,  and  their  hopes,  and  to  restore  the  reign  of  righteous- 
ness and  peace  to  the  world  afflicted  with  miseries  and 
crimes.  This  was  a  natural  consequence  of  the  piety  and 
prophetic  character  of  the  father  of  the  race  after  the  deluge. 
Instructing  his  children,  who  were  destined  to  be  the  found- 
ers of  the  future  nations  of  the  world,  in  the  principles  of 
piety  and  virtue,  he  would  be  especially  solicitous  to  instil 
into  their  minds  this  sublime  and  blessed  hope,  which  was 
given  by  God  as  the  consolation  of  man  in  the  depth  of  hi3 
affliction  after  the  fall.  If  the  Mosaic  history  of  the  world 
be  true,  if  Adam,  after  his  fall,  received  this  consolatory 
promise  ;  and  if  Noah   were  a  good  man,  and  a  prophet  ;* 


*"  From  t^ie  pious  and  prophetic  character  ascrihod  to  Noah  in  the  sacrod  writ* 
ings,  we  ought  to  expect  among  his  nsar  descendants,  the  founderf;  of  the  variow 
nations  of  the  world,  many  good  men,  well  instructed  in  the  principles  of  religion 
3.S  far  as  they  were  kaown  to  bim,  aud  io  those  traditionary  jpredictious  wbi<A 

31 


16  J 

then  ought  we  to  expect  to  find  this  original  prediction  and 
promise,  wilh  more  or  less  clearness,  among  the  traditions  of 
all  the  primitive  nations  of  mankind  ;  and,  finding  it  among 
all  nations,  as  we  do,  it  may  justly  be  considered  as  an  abso- 
lute verification  of  the  account  of  Moses,  and  of  the  existence 
of  this  prophecy  from  the  beginning  ;  for  we  can  hardly  con- 
ceive of  any  other  mode  in  which  it  could  have  been  so  uni- 
rersally  diffused.  It  received  further  elucidation  and  exten- 
sion, in  the  progress  of  time,  by  succeeding  patriarchs  and 
prophets.  The  knowledge  of  it  became  more  definite  by 
the  dispersion  of  the  Jewish  nation,  who  carried  their  sacred 
writings  wrth  them  in  all  their  wanderings.  At  length  the 
precise  period,  at  which  the  Messiah  should  appear,  became 
fixed  and  settled  in  prophecy.  And,  at  the  moment  that  his 
birth  was  announced,  the  world  was  waiting  for  the  exeni 
with  anxious  and  universal  expectation.     The  harmonious 


had  been  imparted  either  to  himself,  or  to  antecedent  patriarchs  and  prophets^ 
These,  of  course,  would  be  transmitted  to  their  posterity,  and,  for  several  gene- 
rations, perhaps,  in  a  considerable  degree  of  purity.  But,  at  length,  becoming 
corrupted,  and  blended  wi-thraany  fables,  and  having  descended  i^oiarfrom  their 
source  that  tlreir  true  origin  was  in  a  great  measure  forgotten,  or  in  danger  of  be- 
ing so,  it  is  reasonable  to  beliei'ethat  some  good  men,  in  different  nations,  in  or- 
der to  prevent  them  from  utterly  falling  into  oblivion  ;  or  some  cunning  and  am- 
bitious men,  that  they  might  themselves  pa?s  for  prophets,  or  be  acknowledged  as 
lawgivers  divinely  instructed,  would  commit  them  to  writing,  mixing  with  theiu 
other  matter  connected  with  civil  policy,  or  religion,  and  giving  them  a  form  ac- 
cording to  the  genius  and  views  of  the  authors.  Hence,  perhaps,  the  origin  of  the 
sibylline  verses,  or  oracles  at  Rome,  and  of  other  similar  works  to  which  a  sacred 
veneration  was  paid  in  various  countries  of  antiquity.  And  hence  the  resemblance 
of  these  traditions  in  many  respects  to  one  another,  and  to  the  sacred  scriptures. 
It  is  Dot  improbable  that  these  traditions  might  have  afterwards  received  greater 
clearness  and  precision  from  the  sacred  writings,  which  were  dispersed,  along  witfe 


163 

aause  of  Virgil  has  presented  to  us  the  character  of  the  cv 
pected  Prince  and  Saviour,  drawn  from  tradition,  and  has  ex- 
hibited the  general  hope  and  solicitude  of  the  nations  for  his 
appearance  at  tftat  time,*  in  an  exquisite  poem,  and  almost 
in  prophetic  numbers. f  "  The  last  age,  says  he,  is  at  lenjj^th 
arrived,  predicfed  by  the  prophetess  of  Cumse.  The  mighty 
order  of  ages  begins  to  circle  anew.  Justice  returns  to  the 
earth,  and  (he  happy  reign  of  Saturn  ;  and  from  heaven  de- 
scends a  new,  and  divine  offspring.  Soon  shall  the  great 
months  begin  to  revolve  ;  and  every  vestige  of  our  former 
ctimes  shall  be  effaced  :  thus  shall  the  earth  be  redeemed 
from  (he  distressing  causes  of  perpetual  fear.     He  shall  par- 


tVe  people  of  Israel  and  Judea,  after  their  respective  captivities,  tlircuc^h  all  the 
nations  of  the  East.  To  tfie  lioly  records  tiie  name  of  Daniel  would  naturally 
give  great  authority,  wlio,  during  many  years,  directed  all  the  principal  operations 
of  the  vast  empires  of  Babylon,  and  Persia,  which  extended  over  the  greater  part 
of  the  Asiatic  continent. 

*  T!ip  time  at  which  this  great  poet  wrote  was  but  a  few  years  before  the 
birth  of  Christ. 

f  Ultima  Cumaei  venit  jam  carminis  aetas; 

Magnus  abintegro  seclorum  na^citur  ordo. 

Jem  redit  et  V^irgoj  redeunt  Saturnia  regna;  ^ 

Jam  nova  progenies  ccelo  dimittitur  alto. 

Incipient  ma2;ni  procedere  menses, 

Te  duce,  siqui  maneut  sceleris  vestigia  nostri, 
Irrita  perpetua  solvent  formidine  terras. 

Ille  deum  vitara  accipiet, 

Pacatumque  reget  patriis  virtutibus  orbera. 
Aggredere  O  magnos,  aderit  jam  tempus  honoree, 
Cara  deQm  soholes  !  magnum  Jovis  incrementum  ! 

The  whole  eclouge  is  well  known  to  have  been  intended  as  a  complimeiit 
to  PoUio'^  son,  but  it  ig  equally  well  known  to  be  borrowed  from  a  prevalent  opin- 
.  on  or  tradition. 


164 

take  of  the  life  of  gods.  And  he  shall  rule  the  peaceful  world 
with  his  Father's  virtues.  The  time  is  now  at  hand.  Enter 
on  thy  mighty  honours,  dear  offspring  of  the  gods !  O  son 
of  supreme  Jove  !'*  What  a  resemblance  do  we  perceive  in 
these  strains  of  the  Roman  poet,  to  those  of  a  Hebrew  pro- 
phet !  In  the  same  spirit  proceeds  the  whole  of  this  admi- 
rable poem,  which  might  be  esteemed  an  almost  Jiteral  trans- 
lation of  many  of  the  most  beautiful  passages  in  the  prophet 
Isaiah.  And  it  is,  indeed,  far  from  being  improbable  that 
Virgil  was  acquainted  with  the  prophetic  scriptures,  as  they 
had,  long  before  this  period,  been  translated  into  the  polite 
and  universal  language  of  the  Greeks.  Thus  much,  at  least, 
appears  to  be  certain,  that  an  acquaintance  with  the  writings 
of  the  Jews,  seems  to  have  excited,  or  renewed  the  attention 
of  mankind  to  this  great  event  as  being  near  at  hand,  a  vague 
expectation  of  which  had  been  long  nourished  by  the  ancient 
traditions  of  their  respective  countries.  Suetonius  and  Taci- 
tus, whose  historical  accuracy  and  judgment  have  placed 
them  in  the  very  first  rank  of  historians,  both  inform  us,  "  that 
there  prevailed  over  the  whole  East,  an  ancient  and  fixed 
opinion,  that  there  should,  at  that  time,  arise  a  person  out  of 
Judea,  who  should  obtain  the  dominion  of  the  world."*  They 


*  Neither  the  Pagans,  nor  the  great  body  even  of  the  Jewish  nation,  could 
easily  form  just  conceptions  of  the  nature  of  that  spiritual  kingdom  which  the 
Son  of  God  was  coining  to  establish  among  men;  they  therefore  interpreted 
the  figurative  language  in  which  it  was  described  in  their  traditions,  and  pro- 
phecies,  and  by  their  respective  poets,  of  such  temporal  power,  glory,  and 


165 

say,  indeed,  that  popular  flallery,  or  credulity,  applied  these 
traditionary  oracles  to  the  Roman  emperor  Vespasian,  who 
had  been  raised  to  the  euipire  by  the  eastern  legions,  about 
the  time  that  he  engaged  in  the  Jewish  wars.  But  common 
sense  must  convince  every  thinking  man,  that  expectations  so 
universal,  founded  on  predictions  which  had  been  transmit- 
ted down  through  ages,  always  pointing  to  the  same  period, 
and  to  a  divine  personage  of  the  most  sublime  character,  who 
should  appear  upon  earth  for  the  destruction  of  vice,  and  the 
establishment  of  righteousness,  must  have  had  a  different  ori- 
gin from  an  accidental  rumour  generated,  one  knows  not  how, 
and  passing  away  with  the  events  of  the  day  ;  and  a  very 
different  object  from  Vespasian,  who  had  nothing  to  distin- 
guish him  from  so  many  other  soldiers  of  fortune  who  had 
been  raised  from  the  ranks  to  the  imperial  purple. 

Recent  researches  into  the  history  and  antiquities  of  most 
of  the  eastern  nations,  and  particularly  of  Persia,  India,  and 
China,  have  proved  that  similar  traditions,  to  those  which 
Virgil  has  shown  us  to  have  prevailed  in  the  Roman  empire, 
have  existed  among  them  from  immemorial  time. 

In  these  facts  we  have  an  extraordinary  moral  phenome- 
non presented  to  our  reflections,  which  carries  in  itself  no 


empire,  as  were  adapted  to  the  grossness  of  their  imaginations.  The  imagery, 
however,  which  they  employed,  ought  to  have  led  their  minds  to  purer  aod 
sublimer  views. 


166 

Stnail  degree  of  evidence,  that  the  traditions  relative  to  a  fu* 
tyre  divine  teacher,  and  legislator  to  come  info  the  wo:  Id 
were  founded  in  original  prophecj  ;  and  that  all  the  prophe- 
cies of  the  holy  scriptures  relating  to  this  object  were  actual 
inspirations  from  Heaven,  and  had  their  full  completion  in  our 
Lord  Jesus  Christ.  For  before  the  birth  of  Christ  all  na- 
tions had  their  traditions,  and  their  predictions  concerning 
such  a  divine  messenger  as  the  scriptures  have  described, 
and  held  out  to  the  hopes  of  mankind,  through  all  the  line  of 
their  patriarchs  and  prophets,  from  the  beginning  of  the 
world.  These  prophecies,  and  these  traditions  all  pointed 
nearly  to  the  same  country,  and  to  the  same  period.  Accord- 
ingly at  that  period,  and  in  that  country,  when  expectation, 
nursed  by  the  belief  of  ages,  was  all  alive,  arose  a  man  claim- 
ing his  birth  from  Heaven,  who  united  in  himself  all  the  char- 
acters ascribed  in  ancient  prophecy  to  the  future  Messiah. 
He  has^  taught  mankind  the  purest,  and  sublimest  notions  of 
*God ;  he  has  established  among  his  disciples  the  most  holy 
and  rational  worship  of  the  Supreme  Being,  instead  of  those 
grovelling  and  corrupted  superstitions  which  had  before  en- 
slaved the  greater  portion  of  the  world  ;  he  has  proclaimed 
to  the  universe  the  most  perfect  law  of  morals ;  he  has 
brought  life  and  immortality  to  light,  confirming  it  by  his  own 
resurrection,  after  having  submitted  to  death,  as  he  declared, 
for  the  sins  of  the  world  :  and,  certainly,  his  doctrines  have 
produced  the  greatest  and  happiest  revolution  which  has 
ever  taken  place  in  the  moral  ideas,  and  the  manners  of  man- 


167 

kind.  And,  since  his  appearance,  we  see  that  those  expec- 
tations, which  before  were  so  ardent  and  so  universal,  have 
every  where  ceased  ;  for,  to  believers,  they  have  been  com- 
pletely realized,  and,  to  all  others,  if  Jesus  Christ  is  not  the 
divine  messenger  and  prince  who  was  to  come,  there  is  no 
longer  any  foundation  on  which  they  could  be  supported. 
Here  then  is  a  mighfy  stream  of  prophecy  commencing  with 
the  history  of  the  world  itself,  and  continued  down  through 
sccessive  ages  tQ  the  era  of  Christ,  which  carries  in  its 
commencement,  its  extent,  its  progress,  and  its  termination, 
shall  1  not  say,  infallible  signatures  of  divine  truth.  Here 
we  behold  an  emanation  of  prophetic  light  darting  its  distant 
rays  upon  this  glorious  object  from  the  beginning  of  time. 
At  first,  indeed,  it  appears  faint  and  feeble  like  the  dawn 
when  it  begins  to  break  upon  the  darkness  of  the  night ;  but, 
as  the  sun  of  righteousness  approaches  to  his  rising,  we  see 
it  continually  becoming  more  luminous  and  distinct.  At 
length,  we  behold  this  spiritual  sun  appearing  in  all  his  glory  in 
the  heavens,  and  divine  truth  beaming  in  its  full  lustre  on  the 
nations. 

The  holy  prophets  have  not  only  announced  a  future  Mes- 
siah to  the  world,  who  should  derive  his  birth  immediately 
from  Heaven,  but,  in  the  progress  of  that  illuminatirn  which 
gradually  arose  with  increasing  brightness  upon  the  ancient 
church,  they  were  enabled  at  last  to  delineate  his  character, 
as  well  as  to  foretel  the  time  of  his  appearance  upon  the 


168 

earth,  with  such  exactness,  and  with  such  dlsllnguishing 
traits,  as  necessarilj  to  add  great,  not  to  saj  invincible  au- 
thority to  their  predictions.  It  is  not  my  design  to  trace  out 
the  progressive  stages  of  prophetic  light,  under  the  ancient 
dispensations  of  grace,  in  the  figurative  promise  given  to 
Adam  ;  in  the  symbolic  and  practical  revelation  made  to 
Abraham  in  the  command  to  sacrifice  his  son  on  Mount  Mo- 
riah ;  or  in  the  analogy  by  which  Moses  instructed  the 
church  of  Israel :  A  prophet  shall  the  Lord  your  God  raise 
up  to  you,  like  unto  me  ;  him  shall  ye  hear.  These,  and  a 
thousand  other  gradual  developments  of  his  character,  and 
offices,  I  shall  pass  over,  to  come  at  once  to  that  ultimate  de- 
gree of  illumination  which  God  was  pleased  to  afiford  the  an- 
cient church,  when  the  Mosaic  dispensation  was  approaching 
towards  a  close.  Then  we  find,  especially  in  the  prophet 
Isaiah,  such  striking  delineations  of  the  mediatorial  character 
of  Christ,  so  extraordinary,  and  yet  so  accurate  and  just,  as 
must  affect  with  mingled  wonder  and  devotion,  every  reflect- 
ing, and  candid  inquirer  after  truth.  In  the  Messiah,  as  he 
appears  exhibited  by  the  Spirit  which  animated  the  prophets, 
are  united  such  opposite  extremes  of  grandeur  and  humility, 
of  omnipotence  and  weakness,  of  celestial  perfection  and  hu- 
man infirmity,  as  men,  writing  from  the  impulse  merely  of 
their  own  minds,  whether  we  suppose  them  inflamed  with  en- 
thusiasm, or  acting  under  the  direction  of  the  cold  and  calcu- 
lating genius  of  imposture,  would  never  have  brought  togeth- 
er.    A  heavenly  messenger  sent  on  the  most  important  er- 


169 

rand  to  mortala,  a  prince  claiming  his  descent  from  Heaven 
who  was  to  extend  the  empire  of  peace,  and  rishteousnes*, 
over  the  universe,  to  compose  its  disorders,  and  put  an  end 
to  its  crimes,  if  the  picture  were  drawn  merely  from  the  ima- 
gination of  the  writer,  would  be  invested  only  with  those  no- 
ble and  divine  attributes  which  would  become  his  relation  to 
God.  It  never  would  have  entered  into  a  reasonable  mind, 
judging  on  the  common  principles  of  human  nature,  to  com- 
bine with  these  celestial  properties  and  powers,  poverty  and 
weakness,  insult  and  disgrace,  humiliation  and  suffering. 
But  God,  who  was  preparing,  at  once,  an  instructor  and  a 
sacrifice,  a  king  and  a  victim,  for  a  fallen,  and  redeemed 
race,  and  who,  for  this  end,  united  in  the  same  person  the 
most  distant  extremes  of  heavenly  glory  and  of  human  infir- 
mity, so  overruled  the  miuds  of  the  pr  phets  that  they 
have  drawn  a  character  which  they  themselves  could  not 
comprehend,  or  explain  ;  which,  left  to  themselves,  they 
never  would  have  conceived,  and  which  could  be  under- 
stood only  by  the  coming  of  the  great  Archetype  himself. 

Let  us  contemplate  the  various,  and  apparently  contradic- 
tory lights  in  which  he  is  represented  to  us  by  the  spirit  of 
prophecy.  Unto  us  saith  the  prophet  Isaiah,  a  child  is 
horn ;  unto  us  a  son  is  given  ;  and  the  government  shall 
be  upon  his  shoulders  ;  and  his  name  shall  be  called  Won* 
derftdy  Counsellor,  the  Mighty  God,  the  Everlasting  Fa- 

ther,  the  Prince  of  Peace.     And  of  the  increase  of  his  gov- 

22 


U9 

eminent  and  peace  there  shall  be  no  end.^^     And  in  othes 
j)^r(s  of  that  sublime  and  wonderful  book,  he  is  exhibited  in 
such  circumstances  of  humiliation  and  affliction  that  it  would 
be  difficult,  without  the  guidance  of  that  divine  Spirit  who 
ins  i red  the  prophet,  to  conceive  how  they  should  be  appli- 
ed to  the  same  person.     "  He  is  despised,"   says  he,  "  and 
rejected  of   men  ;  a  man  of  sorrows   and  acquainted   with 
grief.     Surely,  he  hath  borne  our  griefs,  and  carried  our 
sorrows:  yei  we  did  esteem  him  stricken,  smitten  of  God, 
and  atfiicted.     But  he  was  wounded  for  our  transgressions  ; 
he  was  bruised  for  our  iniquities  ;  and  the  Lord  hath  laid  up- 
on him  the  iniquity   of  us  all.     He  was  oppressed,  and  he 
was  afflicted  :  he  is  brought  as  a  lamb  to  the  slaughter;  and, 
as  a  sheep  before  her  shearers  is  dumb,  so  he  openeth  not 
his  mouth.     '  He  was  taken  off  by  an  oppressive  judgment  :'f 
and  who  shall  declare  his  generation  ?     It  pleased  the  Lord 
to  bruise  him  :  he  hath  put  him  to  grief.     When  thou  shalt 
make  his  soul  an  offering  for  sin,  he  shall  see  his  seed,  he 
shall  prolong  his  days ;  and  the  pleasure  of  the  Lord  shall 
prosper  in  his  hands."  J     The  actual  coming  of  the  Saviour 
alone  has  been  able  to  reconcile  all  these  apparent  prophetic 
contradictions,  and  to  vindicate  the  inspiration  of  the  holy 
prophets,      fn  his  birth  announced  by  angels,  and  his  death 
amon'^  malefactors  ;  in  the  miraculous  and  omnipotent  pow- 


*  Isaiah  ix.  6tb,  7th.  f  Bishop  Lowtli'a  translation,  v.  8, 

\  Isaiah  liii.  3d~10th. 


171 

era  by  which  he  atfesfed  his  Heavenly  miasion,  and  the 
weakness  which  subjected  him  to  the  power  of  sinful  men  ; 
in  his  yielding  <o  dealli  in  its  most  ignominious  form,  and  his 
resurrection  and  triumph  over  it;  in  his  descent  from  Heav- 
en to  invest  himself  with  the  infirmities  of  human  nature,  and 
again,  in  his  ascension  to  his  primitive  glory  which  he  had 
with  his  Father  before  the  world  wa?,  we  see  extremes 
which  God  only  could  unite  ;  we  behold  a  character  wiiich 
the  Spirit  of  God  alone  could  have  suggested  to  the  minds  of 
the  prophets  ;  we  discern  the  justitieation  of  the  prop?;ets, 
and  their  truth  triumphantly  confirmed  :  and,  in  the  confir- 
mation of  their  truth,  we  see  the  infallible  verification  of  our 
holy  religion.  For  the  Messiah,  as  he  appears  in  the  strains 
of  the  prophets,  and  Jesus  Christ,  as  he  appears  in  the  gos- 
pel, are  characters  so  entirely  out  of  nature,  so  utterly  be- 
yond human  conception  and  contrivance,  that  tie  corres* 
pondence  of  the  prophecy  to  the  history,  and  of  the  history, 
to  the  prophecy,  ought  to  be  regarded  as  an  irrefragable  de- 
monstration of  the  truth  of  both. 

Having  pointed  out  to  you  llie  early  prophecy  of  a  Mes- 
siah in  the  first  promise  made  to  man  after  his  fall ;  the  grad- 
ual and  increasing  light  which  was  shed  on  this  primary  pre- 
diction, in  the  progressive  dispensations  of  divine  provi- 
dence ;  the  universal  expectation  which  was  entertained  of 
the  appearance  of  such  a  divine  personage  upon  earth,  found- 
•ed  probably  on  an  original  revriation  made  to  the  father  of 


172 

the  race,  and  revived,  and  rendered  more  definite  and  clear 
by  Ihe  dispersion  of  the  Jewish  nation,  and  the  Jewish  scrip- 
tures, into  the  various  regions  of  the  East. 

The  patriarch  Jacob,  just  before  his  death,  taking,  under 
the  influence  of  the  Spirit  of  God,  a  prospective  view  of  the 
destinies  of  his  respective  chikhen,  and  their  posterity,  de- 
livers to  Judah,  his  oldest  son,  this  remarkable  prediction, 
•with  regard  to  the  permanence  cf  his  dominion,  and  the  de- 
scent of  the  Messiah  from  him.  "  The  sceptre  shall  not  de- 
part from  Judah,  nor  a  lawgiver  from  between  his  ieei,  un- 
til Shiloh  come,  and  to  him  shall  the  gathering  of  the  peo- 
ple be.* 

The  most  accurate  and  learned  criticism  applied  to  the 
terms  in  this  passage  translated  sceptre  and  lawgiver  leaves 
little  room  to  doubt  but  that  they  imply  the  powers  of  civil 
government  in  the  Jewish  nation.  And  the  interpretation 
universally  given  by  the  ancient  Jewish  church,  and  by  the 
whole  nation  of  Israel,  to  the  name  o^  Shiloh,  (for  they  con- 
stantly interpreted  it  of  the  Messiah  who  was  to  come)  is  a 
proof  that  our  application  of  it  to  the  ever  blessed  Saviour, 


*  Dcut.  xxviii.  57th.  The  term  Shiloh,  according  to  the  root  from  -R-hichit  is 
derived,  may  signify  either  the  prepared,  the  sent,  or  Vie  giver  of  peace,  any  or 
all  of  which,  evidently  referring  to  the  cbaracter  and  oflSce  of  the  expected  Mes- 
siah Till  his  coming,  the  tribe  of  Judah  should  enjoy  hereditary  and  sovereign 
poNver  within  itself;  tlje  plirase/roTu  bcttveenkis  feet,  being  a  modest  Hebraism, 
for  a  natural  descendant  of  his  family. 


our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  is  not,  according  to  the  assertions,  or 
insiniiations  of  many  infidels,  merely  a  recent,  and  conveni- 
ent adaptation  of  a  dubious  term  by  christian  writers  to  the 
purposes  of  their  faith.  No  term  has  had  a  more  precise, 
and  less  doubtful  signification  given  to  it  by  the  uniforQi  voice 
of  all  antiquity. 

The  import  of  this  prediction,  therefore,  is,  that  the  tribe 
of  Judah  should  preserve  a  national  existence,  and  continue 
to  exercise  the  essential  powers  of  civil  government,  till  the 
advent  of  that  great  deliverer  expected  from  the  beginning 
of  the  world.  This  peculiar  distinction  of  Judah,  arising 
from  the  possession  and  exercise  of  the  powers  of  govern- 
ment, seems  indirectly  to  imply  that  this  prerogative  should 
be  lost  by  the  other  tribes  before  the  coming  of  the  Mes- 
siah. And  has  not  this  prophecy,  both  in  its  direct,  and  its 
implied  meaning,  been  completely  fulfilled  ?  All  the  tribes  of 
Israel  except  that  of  Judah  had  lost  their  national  existence, 
and  even  the  distinction  of  their  tribes,  long  before  the  birth 
of  Christ ;  having  been  either  blended  with  the  tribe  of  Ju- 
dah, or  dispersed  and  lost  among  the  various  nations  compo- 
sing  the   Babylonian   empire.^     Judah  retained  both   the 


*  Some  colonies  of  people  possessing  the  law  of  Moses,  and  professing  to  gov- 
ern themselves  bj'  its  moral  and  religious  rites  and  institutions,  as  far  as  their 
present  situation  will  permit,  have  been  discovered  in  the  interior  of  India,  and 
on  tlie  borders  of  China,  who  are  evidently  descendants  of  the  ten  trihes  who 
were  carried  away  into  captivity  by  the  kings  of  Babylon,  before  the  destruction 
of  Jerusalem  in  the  reign  of  Zedekiah,  and  the  captivity  of  the  tribe  of  Judah. 


174 

gcepfre  of  execuf Ive  power,  and  the  prerogative  of  internret- 
ing,  and  administering  their  own  kw  till  Ihe  advent  ot  the 
Saviour.  Christ  was  born  in  the  reign  of  Herod,  the  last 
prince  who  swayed  the  sceptre  of  Jiidah,  and  but  a  lew 
years  before  the  final  extinction  of  the  supreme  judical,  le- 
gislative, and  religious  authority  of  the  nation  ;  and  even  of 
the  nation  itself  as  a  distinct  civil  community.  For,  after 
Herod,  the  government  of  the  Jews  was  for  a  short  tiuie  di- 
vided among  several  petty  princes,  who  possessed  only  the 
semblance  of  authority,  under  the  supreme  power  of  the  Ro- 
mans ;  and,  on  the  destruction  of  Jerusalem,  which  followed 
in  a  few  years,  the  miserable  remnants  of  that  people,  whom 
a  foreign  sword,  and  the  most  frightful  civil  discord,  had 
spared,  were  dispersed  into  all  nations  under  heaven.  And 
in  this  state  of  dispersion  they  remain,  the  visible  monuments 
of  the  divine  judgments,  to  this  day. 

Let  me,  then,  express  the  spirit  of  this  prophecy  in  the 
following  reflections.  The  typical  church  and  kingdom  of 
the  Messiah  shall  exist,  till  his  advent,  in  the  nation  of  Israel, 
and  particularly  in  the  tribe  of  Judah  ;  in  which  tribe  shall  be 
vested  and  continued,  for  this  purpose,  all  the  powers  of  go- 


They  possess  none  of  the  prophetic  writings  after  the  age  of  David.  And  their 
copies  of  the  pentateuch  are  plainly  of  the  most  remote  antiquity ;  as  appears 
from  the  kind  of  skins  on  which  tliey  arc  written,  and  from  the  circumstance  of 
the  letters,  in  many  places,  not  being  distinguishable,  except  by  traces  left  in 
the  skins,  which  have  been  made  by  the  corrosion  of  the  liquid  with  which  they 
were  originally  traced. 


ir5 

Vernment  both  civil  and  religious.  But  when  the  Messiaib 
sbali  have  couie,  Uie  reusuns,  for  which  this  people  is  chosen 
by  Goiljund.aepaiatecl  as  a  church  to  himself  from  all  the 
Cihernatious  of  the  earth,  shall  cease;  and  then  shall  termi- 
nate their  national,  and  typical  existence.  The  spirilual  em- 
piiC  of  the  Redeemer  shall,  after  this  period,  embrace  all  na- 
tions without  distinction,  or  preference  ;  and  to  him  sliLtll  the 
gathering  of  I  he  people^  be.  With  v/hat  wonderful  exact- 
ucMSj  then,  have  we  seen  this  venerable  patriarch  and  pro- 
phet detern)ine  the  era  of  this  great  event ;  trace  out  the 
destinies  of  his  several  sons,  and  restrict  to  Judah,  the  pecu- 
liar benediction  of  Abraham,  which  consisted  in  this  promise  : 
in  thy  seed  shall  all  thejamilies  of  the  earth  be  blessed. 

About  the  period  of  the  birth  of  Christ,  the  visible  de- 
cline of  the  Jewish  state,  and  its  rapid  tendency  to  dissolu- 
tion,  indicated,  by  manifest  and  unequivocal  symptoms,  to  ob- 
serving and  reflecting  minds,  the  approach  of  the  great  era 
fixed  for  the  coming  of  the  Messiah.  Therefore  Simeon, 
and  many  other  pious  Jews,  were  rvaiting,  at  this  time,  with 
anxious  expectation, /o?-  the  hope  of  Israel.  But  the  body 
of  that  nalion,  now  become  worldly,  and  sensual  in  their 
minds,  and  ambitious  in  their  views,  mistook  the  true  charaC' 
ter  of  their  deliverer,  and  the  spiritual  nature  of  his  kingdom. 
They,  therefore,  did  not  recognize  him  when  he  stood  in  the 

*  The  people,  in  this  placp,  as  in  numeroBg  ©tUer  pasiagci  ©f  the  facred  wrilingi 
evidently  relen  to  liie  Gentile  mti«ns. 


176 

midst  of  theui ;  baf,  ungratified  in  their  vain  hopes,  they  put 
him  to  death  in  the  rag;e  of  disappointment,  and  thereby  ac- 
complished another,  and  not  the  least  glorious  part  of  the 
prophecies  concerning  him.  While  flattering  themselves 
with  the  illusion  of  a  martial  and  victorious  prince  who  should 
extend  the  empire  of  Jerusalem  over  the  whole  earth,  their 
impatience  of  foreign  domination  daily  increased,  and  precip- 
itated them  into  disorders  and  revolts,  which  only  hastened 
their  destruction,  and  gave  them  the  last  fatal  proof  that  the 
Messiah  was  already  come,  and  that  they  had  doneunto  him 
whatsoever  they  listed,^ 

And  now,  in  the  conclusion,  let  me  ask,  have  we  not  seen 
a  most  extraordinary  person  appear  in  Judea  according  to 
the  predictions  of  the  sacred  scriptures  ?  And  has  he  not 
appeared  at  the  precise  time  which  they  had  marked  out^ 
and  when,  in  consequence,  he  was  expected,  not  by  the  Jews 
only,  but  by  almost  all  nations  ?  Since  his  coming,  have  not 
expectations,  which  before  were  so  constant  and  universal;, 
entirely  ceased  ?  Has  not  the  Jewish  nation,  according  to 
the  prophecy,  rejected  him  who  came  to  them  as  the  Mes- 
siah ?  And  have  not  the  gentiles  gathered  themselves  under 
his  wings,  while  the  guilty  Jews  have  been  exiled  from  their 
country  and  scattered  through  all  nations  under  heaven? 
Have  we  not  seen  the  greatest  moral  revolution  effected  by 

*Mat.  xvii.   I2th. 


177 

fais  doctrines  which  has  ever  taken  place  in  the  world  ?  And 
are  not  all  these  astonishing  events  evidently  connected  as 
parts  of  a  vast  plan  which  takes  its  beginning  with  time  it- 
self, which  we  have  seen  gradually  unfolding  in  the  sacred 
oracles  for  a  long  series  of  ages,  and  to  the  consummation  of 
which  when  they  ceased  to  speak,  they  still  continue  to  con* 
duct  us  by  the  lights  of  prophecy  ? 

What,  then,  is  the  conclusion  to  which  candid  and  impar- 
tial reason  must  lead  us  from  all  these  premises?  Is  it  not, 
that  the  prophecies  have  been  inspired  by  God  ?  that  the 
plan  which  they  develop  is  the  work  of  God  ?  and  that  it 
has  been  conducted  to  its  wonderful  issue  by  his  own  imme- 
diate hand  ? 

I  have  here  presented  to  you  a  very  partial  review  of  the 
evidence  for  our  holy  religion  which  may  be  derived  fromi 
prophecy.  It  is  an  ample  field ;  I  have  led  you  to  contem- 
plate only  a  single  angle  of  it.  Yet,  I  trust,  I  have  opened 
to  you  enough  to  convince  every  serious  and  ingenuous  mind 
that  is  solicitous  to  obtain  full  satisfaction  on  a  subject  so  in- 
teresting to  the  happiness,  the  duty,  and  the  hopes  of  man, 
of  the  importance  of  exploring  it  more  extensively.  The  ar- 
gument,  however,  as  far  as  we  have  pursued  it,  appears  t» 

me  satisfactory  and  conclusive. 

23 


COLLATERAL  OR   PRESUMPTIVE  PROOFS  OP    CHRISTIAKlTt. 
OF  THE  SUBLIMITY  OF  THE  SCRIPTURES. 

Having  presented  to  you  a  concise  view  of  the  direct  evi- 
dences of  the  (ruth  of  our  holy  religion,  I  proceed  to  exhi- 
bif  some  collateral  and  presumptive  considerations  which 
■will  be  found  of  importance  in  giving  strength  to  the  general 
argument.  Of  this  species  of  evidence  it  is  the  character, 
that  the  various  presumptions,  or  probabilities,  taken  sepa- 
rately, do  not  carry  to  the  mind  that  complete  conviction  on 
which  it  can  entirely  rest  independently  of  other  proof;  but 
the  whole  viewed  together  forms  an  accumulation  of  evidence 
which  is  not  easy  to  resist ;  and  they  greatly  strengthen 
the  impression  of  those  proofs  which  are  more  immediate 
and  positive. 

These  presumptions  arise,  in  the  first  place,  out  of  the 
scriptures  themselves  :  their  sublimily,  their  purity,  their 
plainness,  their  efficacy  on  the  hearts  of  men,  and  their  con* 
sistency  with  the  state  of  the  world,  and  with  themselves, 
though  penned  by  writers  of  such  various  characters,  and  so 
far  removed  from  one  another  in  point  of  time,  through  a  long 
series  of  ages  :  in  the  next  place,  out  of  the  character  of  the 
Saviour,  and  of  those  humble  instruments  which  he  employ- 
ed to  promulgate  his  doctrines  ;  and  lastly,  out  of  the  conse- 
quences which  have  flowed  from  the  promulgation  of  the 
gospeL 


179 

One  of  the  first  of  the  internal  characters  of  the  scriptures 
which  strikes  us,  is  the  grandeur  both  of  sentiment  and  lan- 
guage which  pervades  the  poelic  and  prophetic  parts  of  them 
in  general,    and   especially    that   astonishing   sublimity  into 
which  they  rise  whenever  they  speak  of  the  Deity,  who  is, 
indeed,  their  principal  subject.     They  frequently  present  to 
us  very  noble  views  of  the  actions  and  sentiments  of  illustri- 
ous men,  as  well  as  magnificent  descriptions  of  natural  scenes; 
but  whenever  they  speak  of  the  perfection,  or  the  operations 
of  the  Supreme  Being,   as   if  full  of  God,  they  seem   rapt 
above  themselves.     They  break  out  into  strains  to  which 
there  is  no  parallel,  the  enemies  of  Christianity  themselves 
being  judges  in  the  productions  of  ancient  or  modern  genius. 
This  was  to  be  expected  of  men  writing,  or  speaking  under 
the  influence  of  genuine  inspiration  ;  and  the  existence  of  the 
fact,   that  they  have  thus  spoken  and  written,  affords  a  pre- 
sumption, of  no  inconsiderable  force,  that  they  were  truly 
the  subjects  of  that  divine  inspiration  to  which  they  laid 
claim.     Whence,    if  not  from  this  cause,  was  it  that  a  few 
devout  men   in  an  obscure  nation,  and  in  a  remote  age,  far 
beyond  the  birth  of  arts  in  Greece  or  Rome,  formed  such 
sublime,   or  rather,   such  divine  conceptions  of  Deity,  and 
have  conveyed  them  in  such  elevated  strains  as  there  is  no- 
thing to  equal  in  the  noblest  works  of  those  celebrated  nations 
even  in  the  most  refined  periods  of  their  improvement.     Let 
me  select  only  one  example  of  the  appearance  of  the   Al- 
mighty.    Then  the  earth  shook  and  trembled.     He  bowed 


180 

the  heavens  also  and  came  down,  and  darkness  was  under 
his  feet.  And  he  rode  upon  a  cherub  and  did  fly ;  yea,  he 
did  fly  upon  the  wings  of  the  wind.  The  Lord  thundered 
in  the  heavens:  then  were  the  beds  of  the  ocean  laid  bare  ; 
mid  the  foundations  of  the  world  were  disclosed.^  But 
where  shall  we  find  an  idea  so  sublime  and  expressed  in  such 
a  noble  simplicity  of  language,  as  thai  of  the  creation,  as  it 
is  represented  by  Moses  :  In  the  beginning,  God  created 
the  heavens  and  the  earth  ;  and  God  said,  let  light  be,  and 
the  light  was.-f  Perhaps  words  cannot  better  express  the 
facility  with  which  omnipotence  gave  existence  to  the  uni- 
verse. 

Even  the  name  by  which  the  Supreme  Being  was  pleas- 
ed to  reveal  himself  to  Moses,  exceeds  in  grandeur  and  sub- 
limity whatever  the  religion  or  philosophy  of  paganism  ever 
taught  on  the  subject  of  God.  It  comprehends  ideas  more 
elevated,  and  worthy  the  divine  nature  than  had  ever  be- 
fore entered  the  conception  of  man.  All  the  pagan  nations, 
even  those  who  had  made  the  greatest  advances  in  science, 
if  they  did  not  adopt  an  atheistical  philosophy,  had,  too  near- 
ly, approximated  the  divine  to  the  human  nature.  We  find 
worthy  ideas  of  the  Creator  only  in  the  sacred  scriptures. 

*  Psal.  I8th. 

T  Gen.  i.  I.  This  passage  has  been  quoted  as  a  noble  example  of  sublimity 
and  simplicity  onited,  by  that  illustrious  critic  Longinus ;  and  the  quotation  has 
beea  repeated  after  him  by  almost  every  critic  eince  his  age. 


181 

Jehovah,  which  is  interpreted  /  am  expresses  essential  life, 
eternal  existence,  universal  presence.  It  implies  that  all 
things  existing  in  him,  and  by  him,  and  depending  absolute- 
ly on  his  will  for  the  origin  of  their  Being,  and  their  continu- 
ed existence,  are  to  be  regarded  as  nothing  in  comparison  with 
him,  and  that  he  is  all  in  all.  He  is  the  only  proper  being  ; 
the  universe  is  full  of  him  alone  ;  the  rest  are  passing  shades. 
Where,  then,  among  all  the  nations  of  the  ancient  world,  ex- 
cept in  this  circumscribed  corner  of  the  earth,  favoured  with 
the  peculiar  illapses  of  the  divine  Spirit,  to  keep  alive  the 
perpetual  fire  of  truth,  till  the  rising  ot  the  sun  of  righteous- 
9iess,  do  we  6nd  such  exalted  and  sublime  notions  of  God  ? 
When  this  is  fairly  considered,  may  we  not  justly  say,  fa- 
voured  with  the  peculiar  illapses  of  the  divine  Spirit,  with- 
out assuming  for  granted  a  principle  not  yet  proved  ?  For 
whence,  but  from  this  source,  could  arise  those  transcendent 
discoveries  which  illuminated  the  mind  of  a  Jewish  prophet 
concerning  the  divine  nature  ?  that  burst  of  inspiration, 
whenever  Jehovah  is  their  subject,  which  so  far  excels  the 
pretended  inspiration  of  all  other  poets?  On  any  of  the 
ordinary  principles  or  causes  which  assist  to  develop,  and 
bring  to  perfection  the  genius  of  nations,  or  to  promote  the 
progress  of  science  among  them,  this,  surely,  was  not  to 
have  been  expected  in  the  nation  of  Israel.  In  poetry  noth- 
ing has  ever  equalled  the  strains  of  the  Hebrew  prophets.* 

*  To  be  convinced  of  this,  the  reader  of  taste  need  only  consult  the  translation 
of  Isaiah  by  bishop  Lowth,  with  his  critical  notes  and  explanations,  and  bis  dis- 
sertation OQ  the  Hebrew  poetry. 


m 

Fom  (hem  Milton  has  assisted  the  noblest  flights  of  his 
muse.  When  thej  introduce  the  majesty  of  God,  the  pious 
mind  is  overwhelmed  by  the  torrent  and  grandeur  of  iheir 
thoughts,  and  struggles  to  expand  itself  to  conceptions  which 
it  can  never  embrace.  This  is  the  true  effect  of  the  reli- 
gious sublime.  In  theology,  Plato  obtained  the  title  of  the 
sublime  philospher  of  Greece,  only  for  approaching  those 
ideas  of  Deity  which  every  where  pervade  the  holy  scrip- 
tures. And  his  principles,  he  confessed  he  did  not  draw 
from  the  resources  of  his  own  mind,  or  create  by  the  efforts 
of  his  own  genius,  but  acquired  by  travelling  and  conversing 
with  the  priests  and  literary  men  in  those  countries  in  which 
the  scriptures  were  best  known,  and  in  which  were  found 
the  purest  remains  of  that  original  revelation,  which  I  have 
before  proved  to  have  been  transmitted  by  the  second  father 
of  the  race,  after  the  deluge,  to  those  nations  in  (he  East 
that  immediately  sprang  from  him. 

To  those  sublime  conceptions  of  the  Deity  which  distin- 
guish the  sacred  writings  we  may  add  the  views  which  they 
present  to  us  of  the  government  of  divine  providence  over 
every  part  of  nature,  from  the  highest  sphere  in  the  heavens, 
to  the  atom  which  seems  casually  to  float  in  the  atmosphere  ; 
froQi  an  angel  to  an  insect ;  and  if  we  add  the  doctrines  which 
they  teach  of  the  creation  and  dissolution  of  the  universe, 
and  of  the  final  judgment  and  everlasting  destinies  of  man- 
kind ;  where,  besides,  in  all  the  volumes  of  human  wisdom  do 


13S 
We  find  ideag  so  grand,  and  so  worthy  of  God  ?     We  can 
liat*ll)  resist  the  conclusion,  therefore,  that  they  have  been 
inspiced  l)y  that  divine  and  infinite  Spirit  whose  nature,  and 
whose  truth  they  profess  to  reveal  to  men. 

It  has  been  made  a  question  whether  or  not  the  style  of  the 
sacred  scriptures  be  proporfionably  elevated  with  the  senti- 
ments ;  or  whether,  in  the  structure  and  composition  of  their 
language,  they  are  supported  throughout  according  to  the 
principles  and  rules  of  true  taste.  Eminent  writers  have  ap- 
peared on  both  sides  of  this  question ;  some  contending  foe 
the  affirmative,  and  endeavouring  to  maintain  their  opinion  by 
a  minute  comparison  of  the  diction  of  »he  scriptur  with  that 
of  the  classic  writers  of  Greece  and  Rome  *  others  assert- 
ing that  there  is  no  standard  of  taste  which  can  be  fairly  ap- 
plied to  the  writings  of  all  ages,  and  of  all  countries. f  Hu- 
man nature,  they  say,  undergoes  very  material  changes,  not 
only  in  external  form  and  appearance,  but  in  the  faculties  of 
the  mind,  and  the  habits  of  thinking,  from  climate,  from  the 
state  of  society,  from  the  form  of  government,  from  the  physi- 
cal character  ut  the  country,  from  the  progress  of  arts,  and 
from  various  other  causes,  which  contribute,  at  the  same 
time,  to  create  a  correspondent  variety  in  the  ideas  of  beauty 


*  A,  remarkable  example  of  this  mode  of  conducting  the  argument  we  hare  ia 
SlackweWs  Sacred  Classics. 

+  Of  this  opinion  the  celebrated  WarburtoB  is  the  princiBal  d«fcader  ia  hii  Di- 
vine Legation  of  Moges. 


184 

and  taste  wbich  prevail  in  different  nations.  Hence,  in  all 
ages,  a  lofty  and  enigmatical  manner  of  writing  has  obtained 
in  Asia,  which,  in  Europe,  is  considered  as  swoln  and  bom- 
bastic ;  and,  on  the  other  hand,  the  correct  precision  of  the 
Attic  style,  which  is  admired  in  Europe,  is  regarded  in  Asia 
as  low  and  frigid.  We  are  not,  therefore,  to  look,  say  these 
critics,  for  any  standard  of  excellence  and  perfection  in  writ- 
ing, which  is  invariably  to  govern  the  decisions  of  mankind 
with  regard  to  the  merit  of  works  of  genius  and  taste. 

Such  contrariety  of  opinion  between  men  of  perhaps  near- 
ly equal  daims  to  learning  and  critical  judgment,  is  one  proof, 
among  nf^y  others,  that  the  question  is  not  of  great  import- 
ance. J^^^  3bi«*r*  ^^  divine  revelation  is  to  teach  men  di" 
vine  truths  under  the  inspiration  of  the  holy  Spirit,  leaving 
the  expression  of  it  to  each  writer,  according  to  his  own  gen- 
ius and  taste,  formed  and  modelled,  as  it  will  be  in  some  de- 
gree, by  the  genius  and  taste  of  the  age  in  which  he  lives. 
If  these  should  not  always  be  exactly  conformed  to  the  reign- 
ing taste  of  the  period  in  which  we  live,  this  will  not  form  any 
reasonable  objection  to  the  style  of  the  holy  scriptures,  as 
not  properly  expressing  the  majesty  and  sublimity  which 
ought  to  be  expected  in  the  word  of  God. 

Every  man  of  true  taste  feels  and  acknowledges  the  sub- 
limity of  Shakespeare's  genius,  although  we  perceive  in  his 
strains  many  harsh  and  unharmonious  numbers,  and  some  de- 


185 

partures  from  the  rigorous  exactness  of  critical  rules.  These 
are  in  some  instances  to  be  ascribed  to  the  character  of  the 
age  in  which  he  Hved.  But  frequently  the  noble  flights  of 
his  muse  bear  him  above  all  rule,  and  give  him  a  complete 
empire  over  the  mind,  and  over  the  critic's  art.  So  the  sub- 
limity of  inspiration  may  sometimes  disdain  to  be  measured 
by  the  little  niceties  of  artificial  rules.  But  I  make  no  apolo- 
gy for  the  prophets.  Elevated  and  transported  with  the 
grandeur  of  their  subject,  whenever  they  speak  of  God,  oi' 
his  works,  or  rapt  with  the  fervour  of  their  own  devout  feel- 
ings beyond  the  ordinary  limits  of  human  nature,  they  always 
express  themselves  nobly,  and  often  with  a  transcendent 
glow  and  majesty  of  diction. 

But  in  treating  of  the  sublimity  of  the  holy  scriptures,  and 
applying  to  them  the  rules  of  a  just  criticism,  it  is  necessary 
to  use  the  same  fairness  and  candour  in  judging  of  them,  as  of 
all  other  works  of  genius.  The  design  of  the  writer  should 
be  kept  in  view  as  well  as  the  nature  of  his  subject,  that  we 
may  not  look  for  the  high  ornaments  of  style  in  simple  chro- 
nicles, nor  for  the  sublime  of  poetry  or  eloquence  in  didactic 
precepts.  Every  part  even  of  holy  writ  is  not  to  be  judged 
by  the  same  rule. 

Besides,  as  inspiration  was  designed  only,  or  principally, 

to  discover  truth,  but  does  not  seem  in  any  other  way  to  have 

controled  the  faculties  of  the  human  mind,  except  by  the  ar- 

24 


186 

dour  mih  which  it  seized  them  and  the  strong  impressioDS 
which  it  made  upon  them,  a  variety  of  style  is  to  be  expect- 
ed among  the  sacred  writers,  arising  from  diversity  of  nat- 
ural talents,  and  acquired  improvements,  or  from  the  manners 
and  genius  of  the  respective  ages  in  which  they  lived. 

In  estimating  the  true  character  of  the  scripture  style  we 
ought  to  be  able  to  have  recourse  to  the  original.  Great  al- 
lowances ought  to  be  made  for  the  impertections  of  a  literal 
translation  in  prose,  such  as  ours  is,  of  compositions,  many  of 
them  written  in  the  highest  spirit  of  poetry.  Take  the  finest 
passages  of  the  most  admired  classics  of  Greece  or  Rome, 
and  render  them  in  a  translation  equally  simple  and  literal ; 
take,  for  example,  the  translation  of  Virgil  by  Watson,  and 
compare  it  with  our  English  version  of  the  scriptures,  and 
you  must  be  forcibly  struck  with  the  superior  majesty  of  the 
prophets  and  psalmists  of  Israel,  above  that  of  the  prince  of 
Ro:iian  poets,  when  exhibited  before  you  in  the  same  dress. 
The  scriptures  of  the  Old  Testament,  then,  read  with  these 
views,  and  under  these  precautions,  will,  I  doubt  not,  fully 
support  their  claim  to  a  divine  original,  not  only  by  the  sub= 
lirnity  of  their  sentiments,  but  by  the  nobleness  of  their 
diction. 

The  New  Testament,  indeed,  is  written  with  the  utmost 
siniplicitj^^  of  tiie  narrative  and  epistolary  style ;  but  it  con- 
tains the  sublimesl  system  of  theology  and  of  morals  ever  of- 


isr 

fered  to  the  faith,  or  the  reason  of  mankuid.  Here  we  be- 
hold the  threefold  existence  of  the  Deity  without  destroying 
the  perfect  simpHcity  of  the  divine  essence.  Here  we  be- 
hold the  astonishing  assumption  of  the  human  nature  into  an 
intimate  union  with  the  divine.  Here  all  the  types  and  cere- 
monies of  the  ancient  dispensation  are  seen  to  terminate  in  the 
Messiah ;  all  its  altars  are  extinguished,  and  their  innumera- 
ble victims  are  comprised,  and  forever  end,  in  one  divine  ob- 
lation for  the  sins  of  the  whole  world.  Here  we  are  taught 
lo  look  forward  to  the  dissolution  of  the  universe,  and  the  re- 
surrection of  the  dead  ;  and  all  nations  of  men  from  the  be- 
ginning to  the  end  of  time  are  presented  to  our  view  assem- 
bled before  the  tribunal  of  God.  Here  are  decided  the  eter- 
nal destinies  of  men  and  angels.  And  after  the  great  catas- 
trophe of  nature,  we  are  taught  to  expect  new  heavens  and  a 
new  earth,  with  the  introduction  of  a  new  and  everlasting  or- 
der of  ages.  Whether  the  truth  of  Christianity  be  admitted 
to  be  demonstrated  or  not,  surely  infidelity  itself  must  be  con- 
strained to  confess,  that  these  are  the  most  grand  and  sublime 
ideas  which  have  ever  entered  the  human  mind.  And  most 
worthy  they  appear  to  be  of  that  infinite  wisdom,  and  holi- 
ness, and  benignity,  and  power,  to  which  they  are  ascribed. 


188 


OF  THE  MORALITY,  AND  EFFICACY  OP  THE  SCRIPTURES 

AS  A  PRINCIPLE  OF  VIRTUE  AND  A  HOLY  LIFE.       OF 

ITS  PRINCIPLE,  JTS  EXTENT,  AND  ITS  AIDS. 

The  purity  and  excellence  of  the  moral  doctrines  of  the 
holy  scriptures,  and  especially  of  those  immediately  taught 
by  our  Saviour  himself,  and  the  blessed  apostles,  afford  a  pre- 
sumptive argument,  of  no  inconsiderable  weight,  for  their  di- 
vine authority.     The  principles  of  morals,  and  the  rules  of 
virtue,  have  always  been  subjects  of  the  most  diligent  and 
curious  inquiry   among  the  sages  of  the  ancient  world,  ever 
since  civil  society  was  first  established  under  the  influence 
of  regular  laws,  or  philosophy  began  to  be  cultivated.     But 
no  where  else  do  we  find  such  a  pure,  and  excellent,  and 
perfect  system  of  morals  as  in  the  sacred  writings.     And  this 
has  been  acknowledged  by  many  of  the  most  ingenious  and 
candid  enemies  of  the  christian  religion,  while  they  ascribe 
it,   however,   to  a  cause  which  we  can  by  no  means  admit ; 
the  natural  progress  of  science,  and  the   gradual  advances 
which  have  been  made  in  the  improvement  of  the  human 
mind  by  adding  the  experience  of  following  ages,  to  the  wis- 
dom of  the  past.     No  such  superior  improvements  in  moral 
science  were  found,  at  the  commencement  of  the  christian 
era,  in  the  doctrines  of  the  schools  ;*  and  it  is  inconceivable 

*  Of  this  every  classic  reader  may  easily  be  convinced  by  consulting  Cicero 
dc  nalura  deorum. 


189 

Ihat  they  should  have  first  taken  their  origin  among  the  fish- 
erraen  and  mechanics  of  Judea.  The  argument  would  have 
had  more  plausibility  applied  to  the  learned  men  of  modern 
ages,  if  we  had  not  the  most  certain  evidence  that  the  superi- 
ority of  their  moral  and  theological  doctrines  to  those  of  the 
ancient  schools,  ought  to  be  ascribed  solely  to  the  illumina* 
tion  shed  by  the  scriptures  on  the  christian  world.* 

True  it  is,  that  any  pretence  to  revelation  must  come  re- 
commended by  some  general  system  of  good  morals,  other- 
wise it  will  soon  fall  to  the  ground.  But  when  an  impostor 
has  set  up  a  fictitious  claim  to  inspiration,  we  may  ever  ex- 
pect to  find  some  traits  of  human  weakness  and  depravity 
mingled  with  his  religious  doctrines.  It  is  almost  impossible 
that  an  impious,  or  immoral  man  should  not  transfuse,  in 
some  degree,  the  colour  of  his  own  character  into  his  work. 
Hence,  amidst  the  general  precepts  of  justice,  temperance, 
and  chastity,  w^ithout  which  civil  society  cannot  exist,  and 
which  enter  into  all  the  religions  of  the  world,  still  we  find, 
in  the  temples  of  paganism,  free  permission  given  to  the  in- 
dulgence of  the  most  licentious  passions  of  the  heart.  It  is 
in  the  koran  itself,  in  the  vicious  license  which  it  grants  its 
disciples,  and  the  sensual  paradise  which  it  confers  on  its 
military  saints,  that  we  might  learn  the  lust,  and  violence  of 


*  Whatever  is  excellent  in  the  theological  and  moral  principles  of  the  koran  of 
Mahomet,  we  have  likewise  reason  to  believe  was  drawn  from  the  knowledge 
which  that  impostor  had  both  of  the  writings  of  the  Old  and  the  New  Testament. 


190 

its  author  if  we  were  not  acquainted  with  the  history  of  his 
life.     But,  in  the  holy  scriptures,  you  not  only  discern  a 
general  system  of  good  morals,  many  excellent  precepts  of 
piety  and  virtue,  but  you  have  presented  to  you  a  perfect 
body  of  doctrine  in  which  the  most  faithful  and  candid  scru- 
tiny can  find  nothing  of  an  opposite  character  or  tendency. 
In  them  you  perceive  the  principles  and  examples  of  the 
purest  devotion,  equally  removed  from   the  injudicious  fer- 
vors of  enthusiasm,  and  the  cold  and  burdensome  ceremonial 
of  superstition :  in  them  you  see  personal  puriiy  carried  to 
the  highest  degree  of  perfection ;  and  those  virtues  which 
most  effectually  promote  the  harmony,  and  the  happiness  of 
society  placed  on  their  only  true  and  stable  foundation ;  char- 
ity which   loves   our    neighbour   as    ourselves;    meekness 
which   is   not   prompt    to  revenge   an   injury ;    forgiveness 
which  is  ready  to  forget  it ;  the  whole  animated  by  the  love 
of  God,  and  guarded  against  the  disorders  of  the  injurious 
passions  by  the  holy  influence  of  his  fear. 

On  this  subject  the  following  considerations  particularly 
merit  your  attention  :  the  spirit  of  the  morality  of  the  gospel : 
its  extent :  the  principles  which  it  lays  down  as  the  summa- 
ry, and  the  only  true  and  efficient  spring  of  all  our  duties  : 
and  finally,  the  discriminating  test  which  it  proposes  of  the 
sincerity  of  our  obedience. 


191 

It  has  been  justly  remarked  by  Dr.  Paley,  after  the  ceie 
biated  Soaiiie  Jeiuiyns,  fhat  ihe  spirit  of  the  moralify  taught 
by  our  blessed  Saviour  is  entirely  opposed  to  those  splendid 
and  ostentatious  qualities  which  too  generally  pass  in  the 
world  for  virtues  of  a  superior  order,  and  which  history  so 
often  ambitiously  displays  to  decorate  her  style,  and  to  cap- 
tivate the  unthinking  admiration  of  mankind  for  her  principal 
heroes.  The  gospel  gives  no  praise  to  that  pride  which  ex- 
alts itself  over  our  fellow  men,  and  is  easily  provoked  at  in- 
juries real  or  imaginary  ;  it  has  no  indulgence  for  that  jealous 
honour  which  is  ever  ready  to  suspect,  and  revenge  insults, 
or  that  lofty  ambition  of  power  and  command,  which  the  mis- 
take of  the  world  is  apt  to  extol  as  a  pioof  of  elevation  and 
nobleness  of  mind.  On  the  other  hand,  next  to  the  love  and 
fear  of  God,  it  bestows  all  its  approbation  on  meekness  of 
spirit,  on  candour,  on  humility,  on  charity  and  kindness  of 
heart,  in  a  word,  on  those  mild,  innocent,  unassuming,  and 
benevolent  dispositions,  which  give  birth  to  the  sweetest  in- 
tercourse among  mankind,  and  form  the  strongest  and  happi- 
est cement  of  society.  This  is  a  morality  entirely  different 
in  its  genius  from  that  which  would  be  dictated  by  the  spirit 
of  the  world.  It  is  peculiar  to  the  gospel.  And  allhough, 
at  the  first  view,  it  may  seem,  to  those  who  have  received 
their  education  in  the  world,  to  be  tame  and  pusillanimous, 
it  will  be  found,  on  a  fair  and  just  examination,  to  discover  a 
more  profound  estimate  of  moral  worth  than  was  ever  betore 


192 

made ;  either  in  the  schools  of  philosophy,  or  in  that  of  the 
world. 

It  is  judiciously  observed  by  both  the  distinguished  wri- 
ters to  whom  I  have  referred,  that  the  heroic  virtues,  as  they 
are  called,  are  calculated  only  to  disturb  the  peace  and  hap- 
piness of  human  society,  and  have,  indeed,  been  the  chief 
sources  of  the  disorders,  the  wars,  and  revolutions  which,  in 
every  period  of  time,  have  afflicted  all  nations.  On  the  con- 
trary, if  all  men  were  governed  by  the  christian  virtues  of 
humility,  of  meekness,  of  candour,  of  forgiveness,  of  charity, 
the  earth,  which  has  hitherto  been  the  theatre  of  violent, 
conflicting,  and  cruel  passions,  would  become  the  residence 
of  tranquillity  and  peace. 

Do  you  ask  if  the  general  prevalence  of  these  meek  and 
pacific  principles  in  a  nation  would  not  expose  it  to  insults 
and  injustice  from  its  powerful  neighbours,  and  render  it,  at 
length,  an  easy  prey  to  their  ambition  ?  I  answer  that  the 
maxims  of  the  gospel  do  not  oppose  the  natural  duties  which 
every  citizen  owes  to  his  country  for  its  defence.  It  is 
among  the  prioiary  obligations  which  the  gospel  imposes  on 
its  disciples,  to  honour  and  obey  the  magistrate^  as  well  as 
to  fear  God.  And  the  supreme  magistracy  of  a  state  owes 
duties  to  the  nation  under  its  protection  very  different  from 
those  which  subsist  between  man  and  man  in  society.  It  is 
the  latter,  chiefly,  which  the  evangelic  rules  of  meekness. 


193 

humility,  charity,  and  forgiveness  are  intended  to  reguiait. 
And  they  promote  peace  and  union  by  cultivating  the  spirit 
of  mutual  love  ;  they  prevent  discords,  by  extinguishing,  or 
correcting  the  passions  which  are  the  principles  of  contention 
and  division.  The  civil  laws  of  most  countries  aim  at  the 
same  end  ;  but  feebly,,  because  they  impose  their  restraints 
only  on  the  outward  actions  ;  whereas  the  gospel  enters  into 
the  heart  to  correct  the  evil  in  its  source.  It  is  folly  there- 
fore to  accuse  of  taraeness  and  pusillanimity,  that  spirit  which, 
by  changing  the  dispositions  of  the  heart,  promotes  the 
peace  of  society  in  the  most  perfect  manner ;  an  object 
which  it  is  the  supreme  end  of  a  wise  legislation  even  imper- 
fectly to  attain,  by  operating  with  its  compulsory  power  on 
the  external  conduct.  It  is  the  error  of  the  world  to  bestow 
its  admiration  on  that  bold  and  ardent  character  of  mind 
which  is  quick  in  its  sensibilities  to  injury,  violent  in  its  re- 
sentments, jealous  of  its  honour,  proud  of  its  darings,  and 
ever  ready,  in  order  to  avenge  itself  of  real  or  imaginary 
wrongs,  to  break  through  both  the  prescriptions  of  law,  and 
the  dictates  of  justice.  Such  is  commonly  the  heroic  char- 
acter whose  achievements  blazon  the  pages  of  history.  Far 
different  are  the  virtues  of  the  gospel.  Silent,  yielding,  and 
benevolent,  they  contribute  to  promote  and  seciuc  the  hap- 
piness of  mankind,  which  the  former  tend  to  destroy. 

"When  we  consider,  then,  the  perfect  and  unmixed  purity 

^f  the  morality  of  the  gospel,   and  the  indications  which  it 

25 


[ 


1»4 

exhffaita  of  a  most  holy  and  spotless  mind  in  its  author ;  when 
we  consider  with  what  admirable  wisdom  he  rejects  the  false 
and  imposing  virtues  which  have  chiefly  commanded  the  ap- 
plause of  the  world,  and  even  the  approbation  of  the  sage, 
and  placed  virtue,  which  is  the  mean  of  promoting  human 
happiness,  upon  its  true  and  only  solid  basis  ;  when  we  re- 
flect, further,  how  peculiar  these  excellencies  are  to  the  gos- 
pel of  Christ,  and  how  far  they  are  above  the  wisdom,  how 
contrary  to  the  spirit  of  the  world,  we  might  well  be  sur- 
prised if  any  of  the  sages  of  Greece,  rising  above  the  genius 
and  improvements  of  their  age,  bad  been  the  authors  of  such 
a  system  ;  but  when  we  take  into  view  the  country,  the  edu- 
cation, and  rank  in  life,  of  Christ,  and  his  apostlea,  we  must 
be  astonished  at  the  wisdom  with  which  they  have  spoken* 
Considering  them  as  mere  men,  bred  up  amidst  the  tools  of 
the  mechanic,  or  the  nets  of  the  fishermen,  it  must  be  utter- 
ly incredible.  Surely,  exclaims  Dr.  Paley,  Jesus  must 
have  been  like  no  other  carpenter,  the  apostles  like  no  other 
fishermen  I  Read  the  discourses,  the  parables,  the  history 
of  the  transactions  of  our  blessed  Saviour ;  read  the  mural 
precepts  with  which  the  epistles  of  the  apostles  every  where 
abound,  and  I  confess  they  appear  to  me  to  bear  the  evident 
and  deep  inscriptions  of  divine  wisdom.  The  mission  of  the 
Saviour,  and  the  doctrines  of  the  gospel  were  confirmed  by 
great  and  numerous  miracles ;  but,  in  my  esteem,  the  greatest 
of  all  miracles  would  be  the  gospel  itself,  if  we  could  suppose 
such  a  traBscendent  systemof  theology  and  morals,  so  sublime. 


195 

so  pure,  so  superior  to  the  wisdom  of  the  age,  to  have  beejLi 
the  uninspired  work  of  the  unlettered  fishermen  of  Judea. 

The  excellence  oC^the  christian  morality  may  be  estimat- 
ed, in  the  next  place,  from  its  extent.     The  gospel  does  not 
limit  its  views  to  regulating  the  external  conduct  and  inter- 
course of  mankind  with  one  another,   to  which  civil  laws  are 
obliged   to   bound  their  influence.     It   goes  to  rectify    the 
thoughts  and  desires  of  the  heart,  and  thereby  to  purify  the 
fountains  of  conduct :  it  places  its  restraints  upon  the  first 
movements  and  springs  of  action.     This  is  a  point  of  the  ut- 
most importance  in  considering  the  true  value  of  the  morality 
of  the  gospel,  which  sets  it  far  above  the  influence  of  civil 
laws,  or  the  discipline  of  the  schools.     For,  however  regu- 
lar the  exterior  deportment  may  be,  if  the  imagination,   and 
the  affections  remain  impure,  the  soul  must  be  unfit  to  ap- 
pear in  the  immediate  presence  of  God  most  holy,  or  to  be 
joined  to  the  society  of  perfect  spirits  in  heaven  ;  and  there 
is  no  security  for  the  rectitude  of  the   conduct   whenever 
temptation  invites,  and  opportunity  favours  indulgence.    Fan- 
cy, if  it  is  permitted   without  restraint  to  amUse  itself  with 
the  plans,  or  to  enjoy  the  pleasures  of  avarice,  revenge,  or   # 
lust ;  if  it  is  allowed  to  present  images  of  impurity  to  the 
mind,  and  range  at  will  through  ideal  scenes  of  voluptuous 
enjoyment,   taints  the  purity,  while  it  inflames  the  passions, 
of  the  heart,  and  corrupts  it  no  less  eff*ectually  in  its  princi- 
ples of  action,  than  could  be  done  by  grosser  gratifies^ 


196 

lions.*     The  great  Teacher,  who  shows  in  all  his  precepts 
how  perfectlj  he  understands  human  nature,  as  well  as   the 
eternal  principles  of  right  and  wrong,  lays  the  check  of  every 
sinful  propensity,  and  every  vicious  actiop  on  the  only  spring 
on  which  it  can  be  laid  with  effect :  on  the   thoughts,  on  the 
fancy,  on  the  heart.     Out  of  the  heart,  saith  he,  proceed  evil 
thoughts,  murders,  adidteries,  ^c.  and  these  are  the  things 
which  defile  a  man.^     And  he  who  sees  the  end  and  con- 
summation of  the  act  in  X\\q  principle  from  which  it  springs, 
and  regards  as  already  done  whatever  is  completed  in  the 
desire,  purpose,  and  determination  of  the  soul,  condemns  ev- 
ery one  who  even  looks  on  the  sex  with  a  lustful  eye.X  What 
impostor,  conscious  of  his  own  imperfections,  would  be  wil- 
ling to  create  so  high  and  severe  a  standard  of  morals  by 
which  he  must  be  judged  himself  ?     What  crafty  founder  of 
a  sect  would  not  be  more  complaisant  to  the  tastes,  or  the 
frailties  of  those  v/hom  he  wished  to  allure  to  the  party  of 
his  followers  ?11 

*  This  is  a  rrraark  founded  on  the  strictest  principles  of  reason,  as  well  as  of  the 
gospel,  which  strongly  condemns  the  readers,  as  well  as  writers  of  licentious  poe- 
try; and  universally,  all  those  who  encourage,  by  their  presence,  any  licentious 
exhibitions,  or  by  purchasing  any  licentious  productions  of  tlie  arts, 

f  Mat.  XV.  19. 

iMat.v,  23. 

II  I  am  aware  that  retreat  from  the  world,  abstemiousness  and  rigid  penances  of- 
ten have  an  air  of  sanctity  in  the  eyes,  of  a  superstitious  people  ;  and  these  morti- 
fications have  been  introduced,  as  among  the  pharisees,  tlie  Roman  Catholics,  and 
the  Mahometans,  to  gain  a  certain  degree  of  popular  respect  for  their  respective 
systems.  But  in  such  impostures  you  always  find,  at  the  same  time,  some  facili- 
ties permitted  to  the  wealthy  and  the  powerful  to  evade  the  rigors  of  penance  j  or 
«orQe  indulgences  granted  in  other  articles  to  compensate  these  privations. 


i9r 

The  summary  of  duty,  In  the  next  place  laid  down  in  the. 
holy  scriptures,  as  comprehending  the  whole  spirit  and  sub- 
stance of  the  morality  of  the  gospel,  serves  to  demonstrate 
its  excellence  and  perfection. 

All  our  duties  may  be  divided  into  two  great  classes : 
those  TThich  we  owe  immediately  to  God  :  those  which  ter- 
minate directly  on  our  fellow  men.  And  of  both  these  clas- 
ses our  blessed  Saviour  has,  after  Moses,  who  received  it 
from  God  himself  to  be  prefixed  to  the  tables  of  the  ten  com- 
mandments, given  the  moat  admirable  and  perfect  epitome : 
"  thou  shalt  love  the  Lord  thy  God  with  all  thy  heart,  and  with 
all  thy  soul,  and  with  all  thy  mind  ;  this  is  the  first  and 
great  commandment ;  and  the  second  is  like  unto  if,  thou 
shalt  love  thy  neighbour  as  thyself."^  By  this  concise  view 
of  the  great  and  commanding  principles  of  morals,  we  see 
that  the  gospel,  which  places  the  restraint  of  all  vicious  and 
sinful  actions  in  a  renewed  heart,  the  only  efficient  point  in 
which  it  can  be  fixed,  places  there  also  the  true  spring  of  all 
duty.  And,  is  it  not  evident  that  the  worship  of  God  in 
spirit  and  in  truth,  veneration  for  his  holy  name,  resignation 
to  the  dispositions  of  his  providence,  and  universal  obedience 
to  whatever  bears  the  stamp  of  his  authority,  will  flow  from 
supreme  love  to  him  as  from  its  native  fountain  ?  And,  on 
the  other  hand,  is  it  not  equally  evident  that  justice,  bene- 

*^Mat.xiii.  35,  40. 


198 

Volence,  candour,  sincerity,  meekness,  forgiveness,  and  all 
those  virtues  which  fulfil  the  multiplied  relations  which  we 
bear  to  our  fellow  men,  will  be  the  natural  and  necessary  con- 
sequence of  sincere  and  undissembled  love  ?  But  do  you  ask> 
if  these  principles  are  peculiar  to  the  gospel  ?  If  we  do  not 
also  find  them  inculcated  by  heathen  moralists?  We  find 
reverence,  and  thankfulness  to  the  gods  frequently  recom- 
men'Jed  by  some  of  the  philosophers  ;  but  in  none  of  their 
writings  do  we  see  the  supreme  love  of  God  stated  as  the 
fundamental  principle  of  virtue  and  duty.  In  none,  is  the 
"will  of  God  stated  as  the  sole,  creating,  preserving,  and  regu- 
lating power  of  the  universe,  to  which,  therefore,  our  most 
profound  veneration  and  submission,  our  most  constant 
and  fervent  gratitude  are  due.  Indeed,  they  had  ex- 
tremely imperfect,  or  rather  no  just  views  at  all  either  of 
creation  or  of  providence.  And  in  the  catalogue  of  virtues 
which  connect  us  with  mankind,  although  some  of  their 
schools  require  justice,  truth,  chastity,  and  recommend 
friendship,  gratitude,  and  beneficence ;  yet  we  find  not  in 
any  of  them,  the  love  of  enemies,  the  forgiveness  of  injuries, 
nor  any  thing  which  may  properly  be  called  charity,  as  it  is 
understood  by  christians,  and  inculcated  in  the  gospel. 

I  am  warranted,  then,  by  the  concurrent  sentiments  of  the 

wisest,  most  candid,  and  pious  christian  writers,  in  pronounc- 

/    ing  that  never  has  a  basis  of  duty,   equally  clear,  compre- 

bensive,  and  complete,  been  laid  in  the  works  of  any  of  the 


sages  of  paganism,  as  that  wliicb  has  been  laid  in  the  gospel 
of  Chiist ;  and  never  has  such  a  moral  superstructure  been 
reared  on  any  basis  ;  so  admirable,  for  its  purity,  for  its  sim- 
plicity, for  its  adaptation  to  every  grade  of  human  under- 
standing, for  its  fulness,  and  its  applicalion  to  every  case 
which  can  arise  to  a  fair  and  candid  mind  in  the  conduct  of 
life.  If,  then,  these  principles,  and  this  system  which  ap- 
pear so  perfect,  would  have  been  wonderful,  proceeding  from 
the  genius  and  the  pen  of  a  Plato,  or  a  Marcus  Antoninus ;  if, 
indeed,  we  see  nothing  parallel  in  the  schools  of  Greece  or 
Rome  ;  how  much  more  wonderful  are  they  if  we  consider 
them  merely  as  the  productions  of  unlettered  peasants  be- 
longing to  a  country  which  Greek  and  Roman  pride  regard- 
ed as  barbarian  ? 

Having  been  nursed  and  educated  amidst  that  light  whicli 
the  gospel  diffuses  wherever  it  is  received,  we  are  apt  to  re- 
gard its  moral  doctrines  as  containing  only  the  simple  and  ob- 
vious dictates  of  natural  reason  ;  because  they  have  entered 
into  our  earliest  education,  they  have  mingled  with  our  first 
ideas,  and  been  incorporated  from  iij^ncy  with  all  our  habits 
of  thinking.  But  to  be  justly  impressed  with  the  full  force 
of  the  claiai  which  it  possesses  to  a  divine  original,  we  should 
return  back  to  the  periods  which  preceded  the  christian  era, 
and  to  those  countries  which  did  not  enjoy  the  light  of  reve- 
lation, and  see  what  the  wisdom  of  the  wisest  men  has  dis- 
covered upon  the  subject  ©f  duty  and  morals.     This  will  af- 


'260 

ford  an  argument  founded  on  fact  and  experience,  the  onijT 
ground  on  which  we  can  rest  a  just  and  satisfactory  conclu- 
sion on  this  subject.  And  when  we  see  what  the  sages  of 
the  most  enlightened  nations  have  not  done,  and,  on  the  oth- 
er hand,  what  has  been  done  by  the  simple  fishermen  of  Ju- 
dea,  under  the  instructions  of  a  master  as  little  indebted  as 
themselves  to  human  science,  will  it  not  afford  a  strong,  and 
almost  irresistible  presumption  of  the  reality  of  that  divine 
inspiration  from  which  they  professed  to  have  derived  this 
extraordinary  wisdom  ?  We  know  not  how  men  in  that  agCj 
in  that  country,  and  in  their  station  of  life  could  have  attained 
to  such  superior  knowledge  on  these  sublime  subjects,  unless 
they  had  been  divinely  assisted.  And,  surely,  if  inspiration 
has  ever  spoken  to  the  v/orld,  we  cannot  conceive  of  any 
thing  more  pure,  more  excellent,  more  perfect,  which  could 
have  been  dictated  by  heaven  itself. 

Another  characteristic  of  the  evangelic  morality  is  the  un- 
mixed purity  of  the  principle  which  it  requires  in  order  to 
constitute  any  action  good,  and  acceptable  to  God.  Take 
hecdj  says  our  blessed  Saviour,  "  that  ye  do  not  your  alms 
before  men  to  be  seen  of  them.  When  Ihou  prayest,  enter 
into  thy  closet,  and  when  thou  hast  shut  thy  door,  pray  to 
thy  Father  who  is  in  secret.  When  thou  doest  alms,  let 
not  thy  left  hand  know  what  thy  right  hand  doth."*     Of 

^JMat.  vl.  ;= 


201 

wLich  precepts  the  evident  import  is,  that  we  ought  to  o5ec 
our  devotions  to  our  heavenly  Father,  not  as  a  mere  form, 
not  through  ostentation,  but  purely  for  the  love  of  God  ;  and 
that  we  should  fulfil  every  office  of  benevolence  and  cuiiity 
to  our  fellow  men  siinply  from  the  love  of  doing  good.  No 
regard  merely  to  our  own  credit  and  reputation  among  men, 
and  no  considerations  of  honour  or  interest  arising  from  the 
publicity  of  our  good  deeds,  ought  exclusively  to  influence 
us  in  their  performance :  they  ought  ever  to  be  the  natural 
and  spontaneous  effusions  of  the  pious  and  virtuous  disposi- 
tions of  the  heart. 

Many  very  amiable  and  benevolent  persons  have  greatly 
mistaken  the  meaning  of  these  precepts,  as  if  they  implied 
that  the  chief  merit  of  charitable  deeds  consists  in  their  being 
entirely  withdrawn  from  the  knowledge  and  observation  of 
the  world.  So  far  is  this  from  being  true  that,  not  unfre- 
quently^  their  publicity  may  form  part  of  their  good  desert, 
by  the  encouragement  which  it  will  afford  to  the  alms  of  oth- 
ers. It  is  not  the  mode  of  doing  a  benevolent  action  that 
our  Saviour  designed  to  regulate,  but  the  principles  from 
which  it  should  spring.  In  this  view,  what  an  amiable  proof 
do  these  precepts  contain  of  the  excellence  of  the  evangelic 
doctrine,  and  the  celestial  purity  of  its  spirit ! 

Another  character  of  the  sacred  scriptures  which  has  gen- 
erally been  relied  on  as  affording  a  presumptive  indication  of 

26 


202 

their  being  derived  from  God  is  their  simplicity  and  plainness, 
notwithstanding  the  sublimity  of  the  subjects  of  which  they 
treat,  and  the  extent  of  the  system  of  truth  and  morals  which 
they  embrace.  Any  religion,  which  comes  from  God,  must, 
from  its  very  design,  be  adapted  for  the  instruction  of  the 
mass  of  mankind.  And  it  was  the  glory  of  the  gosjiel,  in  its 
commencement,  that  it  was  preached  to  the  poor.  In  ful- 
filling this  great  and  necessary  end  of  popular  edification, 
therefore,  nothing  would  have  been  more  preposterous  than 
to  propose  to  them  abstruse  and  speculative  principles  of  sci- 
ence, or  to  discuss  before  them  such  abstract  questions  as 
were  agitated  by  the  philosophers  in  the  presence  of  their 
disciples.  It  was  requisite  that  religion  should  propound 
the  objects,  the  laws,  and  the  motives  of  duty,  in  the  most 
plain  and  intelligible  form,  that  they  might  be  easily  compre- 
hended by  the  most  unimproved  understanding,  while  they 
should  afford  high  matter  to  employ  the  sublimest,  and  most 
cultivated  reason.  Most  remarkably  do  we  see  these  char- 
acters meet  in  the  gospel.  And  perhaps  no  fact  can  better 
demonstrate  how  admirably  it  is  fitted  to  be  the  instructor  of 
the  people,  than  the  clear  and  general  knowledge  which  we 
now  find  among  all  ranks  of  men,  on  the  subjects  of  our  mor- 
al duties,  and  our  religious  hopes.  A  common  labourer,  in- 
structed, as  the  church  requires  for  the  poorest  of  her  sons, 
would  have  been  esteemed  a  philosopher  among  philosophers 
themselves,  judging  only  from  the  reasonableness  and  excel- 
lence of  his  moral  and  theological  doctrines.     But,  if  they 


295 

were  to  enter  with  him  into  such  disquisitions  on  the  princi- 
ples of  these  doctrines  as  were  common  in  iheir  schools  ;  if 
they  were  to  endeavour  to  trace  them  to  their  primary  ele- 
ments, and  again  to  pursue  them  through  regular  deductions 
to  their  ultimate  conclusions,  guarding  against  objections  and 
doubts  at  every  step,  and  parrying,  or  sol\  iug  a  thousand 
knotty  questions  in  their  progress,  would  not  this  plain  man 
be  confounded  ?  He  would  be  lost  in  the  intricacy  of  their 
speculations,  and  would  not  be  able  at  last  to  recognise  his 
own  principles.  Such  reflections  add  no  small  value  to  the 
plainness  of  the  gospel;  and  may,  perhaps,  justly  be  said  to 
afford  a  presumption  of  the  divinity  of  that  system  which  has 
thus  been  able  to  bring  down  the  sublimest  subjects  to  the 
level  of  ordinary  minds. 

I  subjoin  here,  that  the  efficacy  of  the  holy  scriptures,  by 
which  is  meant  their  tendency,  and  powerful  influence  to  pro- 
duce holiness  of  life  in  those  who  truly  believe  them,  is  otten 
adduced  by  pious  writers  as  an  internal  character,  and  pre- 
sumptive argument  of  their  divine  original.  This  argument 
is  supported  partly  from  reason  and  partly  from  experience. 
In  the  former  view,  we  should  consider  the  motives  and  as- 
sistances of  duty  afforded  by  the  gospel,  and  the  awful  and 
commanding  authority  by  which  it  is  enjoined.  The  mo- 
tives presented  to  the  view,  and  urged  upon  the  conscience 
of  a  believer  in  the  gospel,  are  of  so  transcendent  and  inter- 
esting a  nature,  as  evidently  to  give  it  an  operation,  and  ef- 


204 

feet  upon  the  hearf,  which  can  never  be  perceived  from  any 
system  of  mere  reason  and  philosophy.  Feeble  are  the  mo- 
tives of  reason  alone  to  combat  the  force  of  the  passions.  Bat 
the  gospel,  by  bringing  life  and  immortality  to  lighty  by 
proposing  to  mankind  the  glorious  and  awful  retributions  of 
eternity,  by  the  doctrine  of  a  divine  providence,  of  a  univer- 
sal wilness  and  judge  of  human  actions,  and  even  of  the 
thoughts  of  the  heart,  has  given  a  force  and  effect  to  the  laws- 
of  duty  and  holiness,  which  couid  not  be  derived  from  any 
representations  of  the  present  convenience  and  satisfactions 
of  a  virtuous  life,  however  eloquently  they  might  be  depict- 
ed in  the  discourses  of  the  learned,  but  which  the  heart  is  so 
often  able  to  set  aside,  or  to  render  doubtful  in  the  moments 
of  temptation  and  of  action. 

Consider,  in  the  next  place,  the  authority  with  which  the 
gospel  speaks  to  the  heart  of  a  true  believer,  who  receives 
it  as  the  immediate  and  infallible  word  of  God.  Reason, 
when  it  would  prescribe  a  law  of  duty  to  mankind,  must  often 
speak  in  the  breast  with  a  very  faint  and  doubtful  voice 
amidst  the  prejudices  and  prepossessions  of  self-love,  and  the 
importunities  of  appetite  and  passion,  and  amidst  the  dubious 
and  circuitous  deductions  by  which  it  is  obliged  to  arrive  at 
its  conclusions.  And  it  can  never  prescribe  to  the  people  a 
rule  which,  in  this  uncertainty,  can  clearly  reach  to  every 
case  in  the  practice  of  life.  But  the  authority  of  God  gives 
to  his  law  a  clearness  which  cannot  be  mistaken,  and  a  power 


i!05 

and  conlrol  which  come  home  to  every  thought  and  purpose 
of  the  son!.  Before  the  majesty  of  his  authority,  the  turbu- 
lence of  appetite,  and  the  deceilfulness  of  the  heart  are  over- 
awed, and  brought  to  submission.  And  the  authority  of  God 
is  exhibited  in  the  gospel  as  possessing  claims  to  our  obedi- 
ence, and  a  power  to  command  it,  which  reason  alone  cannot 
exert.  He  enforces  his  law  by  all  the  rights  of  creation  ;  by 
all  the  obligations  of  his  love  in  the  redemption  of  the  world  ; 
and  by  all  the  terrors  of  his  justice,  which  shall,  at  last,  de- 
cide, by  this  law,  the  eternal  destinies  of  mankind. 

Among  the  most  effectual  means  of  holiness,  pious  writers 
have  ever  considered  the  promised  aids  of  the  Holy  Spirit  : 
they  are,  therefore,  to  be  classed  under  that  head  of  presump- 
tive proof  of  which  I  am  now  treating :  the  efficacy  of  the 
scriptures. 

To  a  nature  corrupted  as  ours  is,  the  difficulty  of  conquer- 
ing its  sinful  tendencies  and  habits,  and  turning  its  whole 
force  and  activity  into  an  habitual  love  of  virtue,  of  holiness, 
and  of  God,  that  is,  of  regenerating  and  new  creating  it,  might 
justly  be  regarded  as  insuperable  without  supernatural,  and 
divine  assistance.  At  least,  convinced  sinners  who  feel  only 
the  diflficuities  of  religion,  and  who,  in  repeated  efforts  per- 
fectly to  obey  the  law  of  God,  and  to  overcome  the  power 
of  sin  in  their  hearts,  must  be  sensible  only  of  their  o«vn 
weakness,  would  be  ready  to  sink  into  despondency,  or  re- 


Q06 

bpse  into  tbeir  natural  indolence,  and  love  of  indulgence,  UD» 
less  they  could  find  some  hope  in  the  promised  aid  of  the 
holy  Spirit.  If,  then,  in  maintaining  the  efficacy  of  the  gos- 
pel, to  promote  holiness  of  life,  against  unbelievers,  we  should 
not  be  at  liberty  to  assume  the  reality  of  the  influence  of  the 
Spirit,  which  would  completely  decide  the  question;  yet 
the  promise,  and  hope  of  his  gracious  and  effectual  assistance 
is  calculated  to  encourage  the  perseverance,  and  reanimate 
the  diligent  and  faithful  endeavours  of  every  believer,  and 
may,  therefore,  be  justly  reckoned  among  the  efficient  means 
which  the  gospel  possesses  of  promoting  true  holiness,  and 
reproducing  on  the  heart  of  man  the  image  of  his  Creator. 

Finally,  this  argument  is  supported  by  experience.  I 
might  here  mention,  in  the  first  place,  the  great  and  manifest 
effect  which  the  gospel  has  ever  had  in  producing  holiness. 
of  life  wherever  it  has  been  received  with  a  sincere  faith  — 
But  I  have  chiefly  in  view  that  proof  of  its  divinity  which  it 
carries  to  the  heart  of  every  real  christian  by  his  own  expe- 
rience of  its  sanctifying  influence.  This  is  a  proof  indeed 
that  is  entirely  personal,  and  does  not  belong  to  the  general 
evidences  of  the  truth  of  Christianity.  Yet,  to  a  sincere  be- 
liever, who  has  experienced  this  holy  and  renovating  power, 
and  thus  may  be  said  to  have  the  testimony  in  himself,  and 
this  is  the  principal  view  in  which  the  pious  writers  I  have 
mentioned  propose  this  argument,  there  is,  perhaps,  no  other 
proof  which  cones  home  with  such  life,  and  force,  and  per^ 


307 

auasion  to  his  heart.  The  argument,  however,  which  I  take 
to  be  in  its  nature  very  solid  and  just,  is  calculated,  and  in- 
tended rather  for  the  confirmation  of  the  faith  of  the  believer, 
than  the  conviction  of  the  unbeliever. 

OF  THE  CONSISTENCV  OF  THE  SCRIPTURES    WITH  THEM- 
SELVES, AND  WITH  THE  STATE  OF  THE  WORLD. 

Another  internal  character  of  the  sacred  scriptures,  which 
affords  a  presumptive  argument  of  their  truth,  is  their  COU' 
sisiency.  This  may  be  considered  under  two  views  :  their 
consistency  with  themselves,  and  their  consistency  with  the 
state  of  the  world. 

That  any  work,  the  production  of  one  author,  and  embrac- 
ing a  code  of  legislation,  or  system  of  morals,  how  extensive 
soever,  founded  on  his  peculiar  opinions,  should  be  regularly 
deduced  from  definite  principles,  should  aim  at  one  end,  and 
be  found  coherent  in  all  its  parts,  would  have  in  it  nothing 
surprising.  It  woiiM  be  a  natural  consequence  of  genius,  and 
sound  judgment  in  the  writer.  But,  in  the  scriptures  we  per- 
ceive, not  the  work  of  one  author,  nor  of  one  age,  but  the 
gradual  development  of  a  grand  scheme  of  providence,  and 
of  divine  grace  towards  mankind,  commencing  with  the  ori- 
gin, and  carried  on  through  the  whole  series  of  time,  till  the 
close  of  the  canon  of  the  New  Testament,  in  the  accomplish- 
went  and  illustration  of  which  animaiense  number  of  person*; 


20  ii 

must  have  co-operated  throughout  successive  ages,  not  con- 
nected with  one  another,  and  not  acting,  as  far  as  appears  to 
human  view,  under  any  common  direction.     One  dispensa- 
tion follows  and  is  built  upon  another.     The  same  spirit,  the 
same  principles  of  thei>Iogy,  of  pielj,  and  morals  pervade  the 
whole ;  the  same  spiritual  promises  and  hopes  are  gradually 
unfolded  through  thousands  of  years,  and  conducted  to  their 
ultimate  accomplishment.     Here  is  a  vast  concatenation  of 
events  intimately  linked  together,  and  depending  upon  one 
another  ;  here  is  a  unity  of  plan  in  this  great  system  contin- 
ued down  through  different  dispensations  of  the  mercy  of  God 
lo  the  world,   tending  to  fulfil  one  great  design,  the  salvation 
of  mankind  through  a   Redeemer  ;  of  the  astonishing  deve- 
lopment of  which  design,  continued  through  such  a  long  pe- 
riod, no  reasonable  account  can  be  given,  unless  we  suppose 
the  whole  to  be  under  the  immediate  guidance  and  direction 
of  heaven.     Plans  laid  by  human  contrivance  are  not  so  per- 
manent, and,  if  I  may  use  the  term  so  continuous.     There  is 
no  example,  in  human  affairs,  of  successive  generations  tak- 
ing up  one  design,  unfolding  it  by  degre^  in  a  long  course  of 
ages,  and  carrying  it,  at   length,  to  its  ultimate  completion. 
From  the  character  and  state  of  human  nature,  its  limited, 
and   discordant  views,  this  is  perhaps  impossible.     We  do 
not   perceive  the  various  schools  of  philosophy  concurring 
long  in  the  same  systems  of  physics,  or  of  morals.     One  lead- 
er of  a  sect  differs  from  another  ;  the  disciple  differs  from  his 
master ;  the  principles  on  which  their  respective  theories  are 


built  are  continually  changing.  But  in  the  holy  scripiures 
we  find  one  uniform  consistent  design  pursued  from  genera- 
tion to  generation.  Amidst  all  the  variations  which  in  a  long 
succession  of  ages  must  have  occurred  in  the  state  of  society, 
in  the  manners  of  men,  in  their  habits  of  thinking,  and  in  the 
external  forms  and  usages  of  the  church  itself,  we  still  per- 
ceive the  same  doctrines  concerning  the  nature  of  God,  and 
the  duties  of  man  ;  wc  still  discern  the  same  principles  of  mo- 
rals, the  same  worship  of  the  heart  required  in  true  religion, 
the  same  high  and  eternal  motives  of  duty  urged  upon  the 
Conscience,  the  same  promised  Saviour  exhibited  to  our  faith, 
the  same  plan  of  divine  grace,  distinguished  only  by  the  ad- 
ditional lights  from  time  to  time  thrown  upon  it  as  it  aj)proacli- 
ed  its  final  accomplishment.  In  this  consistency,  then,  we 
behold  a  moral  phenomenon  so  different  from  whatever  takes 
place,  in  the  plans  and  designs  of  men,  as  to  afford  no  slight 
presumption  that  the  whole,  from  its  commencement  to  its 
consummation,  has  been  under  the  wise  and  gracious  direc- 
tion of  the  Spirit  of  God.  The  same  Spirit  seems  to  have 
inspired  the  holy  patriarchs,  the  great  legislator  of  Israel,  the 
long  succession  of  the  Hebrew  prophets,  and  the  evangelists 
and  apostles  of  our  blessed  Lord. 

There  is  another  light  in  which  the  consistency  of  the 
scriptures  may  be  considered,  which  merits  a  more  extended 
illustration  :  it  is  their  conformity  with  the  actual  state  of  the 
world.     Truth  is  always  consistent  with  itself,  and  with  all 


21C 

other  truths.  Error,  though  it  may  be  disguised,  and  to  su= 
perficial  observation,  may  seem  to  bear  a  semblance  of  truth  ; 
yet  in  such  a  wide  field  of  moral,  historical,  and  natural  sci>- 
ence,  as  is  embraced  in  the  holy  scriptures,  it  is  extremely 
improbable  that  any  scheme  of  falsehood  and  imposture,  fab- 
ricated especially  in  such  an  early  age,  should  not  contain 
many  discrepancies  with  the  actual  system,  moral  or  physi- 
cal, of  the  world,  which  would  be  made  more  and  more  man- 
ifest by  the  improvements  of  science.  But  improvements  in 
genuine  science  have  hitherto  only  more  clearly  elucidated 
and  confirmed  the  doctrines  of  the  scriptures,  and  especially 
the  facts  of  the  sacred  history.  Here  we  see  the  depravity 
of  human  nature,  the  existence  of  which  is  demonstrated  by 
a  most  melancholy  experience,  not  only  asserted,  but  ac- 
counted for,  and  referred  to  a  most  natural  source.  Here  we 
ssee  a  remedy  provided  for  this  universal  corruption,  confor- 
mable to  the  hopes  of  virlue,  adequate  to  the  fears  of  guilt, 
agreeing  with  the  soundest  principles  of  reason,  yet  such  as 
reason  could  never  have  discovered.  Here  you  trace  the 
orii2;in  of  nations  in  the  immediate  descendants  of  the  great 
postdiluvian  father  of  the  race ;  and  here  the  different  my- 
thologies of  so  many  people,  and  their  varying  traditions,  re- 
ceive a  reasonable  interpretation,  and  are  reunited  as  in  a 
cooimoa  centre. 


$11 


THE  CHARACTER  OF  THE  AUTHOR  OP  OUR  RELIGION:    THE 
INSTRUMENTS  HE  EMPLOYED  TO  PROMOTE   IT:    THE 
BENEFICIAL  CONSEQUENCES  WHICH  HAVE  RE- 
SULTED FROM   ITS   PUBLICATION   AND 
RECEPTION  IN  THE  WORLD. 

Among  the  presumptive  evidences  of  tlie  truth  of  the 
christian  religion,  none  perhaps,  are  stronger  than  that  which 
arises  from  the  character  of  its  blessed  Author.  No  other 
man  has  ever  existed,  who,  in  his  intercourse  with  the  world, 
was  so  blameless,  so  amiable,  and,  in  every  attribute  which 
deserves  the  esteem  of  mankind,  so  worthy  our  veneration 
and  love.  Such  a  character  would  very  ill  accord  with  the 
duplicity  and  hypocrisy  of  imposture.  As  the  union  of  ihe 
divine  with  the  human  nature  in  the  person  of  the  Redeemer 
is  a  doctrine  purely  of  revelation,  we  are  not  at  liberty,  while 
only  establishing  the  proofs  of  the  gospel,  to  assume  that  prin- 
ciple in  order  to  exalt  the  virtues  and  perfections  of  Jesus 
Christ.  We  must  consider  him  merely  as  he  appeared  to 
the  view  of  men,  claiming  to  be  the  founder  of  a  new  religion 
derived  immediately  from  God,  that  we  may  judge  how  far 
his  character  corresponded  with  his  high  pretensions,  and 
bow  far  these  pretensions  were  supported  by  such  eminent 
virtues,  and  such  freedom  from  error  and  imperfection  in  con- 
duct, as  ought  to  be  expected  in  a  messenger  of  iieaven,  the 
<2xample  and  instructor  of  mankind.     That  he  appeared,  in 


212 

the  eyes  of  Lis  disciplea,  after  their  long  and  intimate  inter- 
couise  with  him,  and  their  dailj  observation  of  his  life  and 
manners,  worthy  of  their  highest  love  and  veneration,  and 
worthy  of  the  heavenly  original  which  he  claimed,  is  strongly 
expressed  in  the  following  declaration  of  Saint  John  :  And 
the  Word  was  made  fleshy  and  dwelt  among  us  ;  and  we  be- 
held his  glory,  the  glory  as  of  the  only  begotten  of  the  Father, 
full  of  grace  and  truth.^  This  whole  passage,  I  presume, 
refers,  not  to  his  transfiguration,  nor  to  any  of  those  appear- 
ances in  which  he  exhibited  himself  to  his  disciples  immedi- 
ately before  his  ascension,  but  to  that  beaidy  of  holiness, 
that  glorious  display  of  virtue  and  perfection  which  shone 
through  hia  whole  life,  and  which,  in  every  part  of  it,  was/wO 
of  grace  and  truth :  that  is,  conspicuously  distinguished  by 
the  most  amiable  condescension,  and  benignity  of  disposition 
and  manners,!  ^"^  ^Y  *^^  '^^^*  undissembled  and  inviolable 
sincerity. 

Among  the  most  distinguishing,  as  well  as  the  most  vene- 
rable characteristics  of  Jesus  Christ,  was  his  piety  towards 
God.  The  universal  government  of  divine  providence  he 
devoutly  acknowledged  in  every  event  of  his  life.  And,  in 
the  immediate  prospect  of  his  most  painful  death,  and,  after- 
wards in  the  midst  of  those  excruciating  sufTerings,  so  studi- 

*  John  i.  14. 

f  This  is  frequently  the  meaning  of  the  original  term  /C^pii,  and,  perhaps, 
always  when  applied,  as  it  is  here,  in  tbedescriptioaof  character. 


21S 

ouslj"  aggravafed  by  the  ingenuity  and  malice  of  wicked  men, 
you  perceive  no  other  emotions  but  those  of  compassion,  and 
forgiveness  to  his  enemies,  but  the  most  perfect  meekness, 
submission,  and  resignation  to  the  will  of  God.  Often  you 
see  him  retire  apart  from  the  admiration,  or  the  curiosity  of 
(he  multitude,  and  the  company  of  his  disciples,  for  the  pur- 
poses of  secret  devotion,  and,  on  the  sabbath  day,  he  is  care- 
ful to  exhibit  an  instructive  example  of  devout  attendance  on 
the  pubhc  institutions  of  religion  in  the  assemblies  of  the  syn- 
agogue. Ever  warm,  humble,  and  affectionate  in  his  devo- 
tional exercises,  you  perceive  in  them,  however,  nothing  of 
those  ecstacies,  nor  of  those  bold  familiarities  with  heaven, 
which  distinguish  the  spirit  of  enthusiasm.  And  in  that 
model  of  prayer  which  he  gave  his  disciples,  which,  for  com- 
prehension of  thought,  for  a  just  selection  of  the  objects  of 
prayer,  and  for  the  true  spirit  of  devotion  has  never  been 
equalled,  you  find  the  genuine  fervours  of  piety  united  with 
the  most  calm,  dignified,  and  rational  expression  of  the  de- 
vout feelings  of  the  heart. 

When  we  descend  to  that  part  of  his  character,  which  was 
exhibited  in  his  intercourse  with  mankind,  it  is,  in  the  high- 
est degree  amiable  and  interesting,  and  worthy  our  admira- 
tion and  imitation.  The  spirit  of  meekness  and  humility 
breathed  through  his  whole  life  and  manners ;  and  his  be- 
nevolence and  charity  knew  no  bounds.  Always  engaged 
in  instructing  the  ignorant  and  comforting  the  afflicted,  you 


214 

bebold  liim  continually  surrounded  with  multitudes  of  poor, 
of  maimed,  of  blind,  of  diseased,  listening  to  his  instructions 
and  consolations,  and  seeking  relief  from  that  benevolent 
power  which  he  was  ever  ready  to  exercise  in  their  behalf. 
His  love  of  sincerity  and  Iriilh  would  never  suffer  him  to  dis- 
guise his  designs,  even  wiien  he  knew  that  his  enemies  were 
only  waiting  for  his  declaration  to  wreak  upon  him  their  most 
cruel  and  murderous  rage.  Yet,  it  was  in  the  midsl  of  the 
Bufferings  inflicted  by  their  cruelly  and  rage  that  the  united 
virtues  of  his  character  shone  with  the  brightest  lustre  ;  sub- 
mission to  the  will  of  God  ;  zeal  for  the  happiness  and  salva- 
tion of  mankind,  the  great  object  for  which  he  laboured  up- 
on earth  ;  the  unruffled  meekness  of  his  nature  under  the  in- 
juries and  indignilies  of  his  persecutors  ;  compassion  and 
forgiveness  towards  his  enemies  in  the  midst  of  the  tortures 
which  he  endured  from  their  hands  ;  (he  dutiful  affection  and 
care  of  a  son  towards  a  destitute  and  afl9icted  mother  stand- 
ing at  the  foot  of  his  cross,  which  no  bodily  torment  could 
suspend  in  his  heart  for  a  moment ;  the  whole  crowned  by 
that  last  fervent  act  of  benevolence  and  devotion,  in  which 
he  expired  ;  Father  forgive  them,  for  tftet/  know  not  what 
they  do.  How  unlike  an  impostor  !  How  far  superior  to 
the  life,  and  the  death  of  heroes,  or  philosophers  !  Rous- 
seau in  lone  of  those  moments  of  warm  and  generous  admira- 
tion of  virtue  which  he  sometimes  felt,  comparing  the  death 
of  Jesus  Christ  with  that  of  Socrates,  gives  to  the  founder  of 
Christianity  an  infinite  preference  to  the  Athenian  sage. 


215 

This  character  of  Jesus  Christ,  indeed,  is  drawn  froth  the 
memoirs  of  his  life  written  by  disciples,  who  may  be  aiip« 
posed  to  have  coloured  it  with  a  pencil  tinctured  by  their 
partiality  for  a  beloved  master.  But  let  it  be  remembered 
that  the  gospels,  were  evidently  not  written  with  any  direct 
view  of  Qiaking  the  eulogy  of  Christ,  but  merely  to  present 
to  us  a  narrative  of  liis  actions  and  discourses,  which  is  done 
with  the  most  undesigning  simplicity.  The  character  we  de- 
rive from  the  facts  as  they  have  presented  them. 

To  draw  a  uniform,  consistent,  and  noble  character,  from 
imagination,  which  shall  be  entirely  new  in  its  principal  fea- 
tures, is  one  of  the  most  difficult  works  of  genius,  and  not 
to  be  expected  from  men  in  that  spiiere  of  life  in  which  the 
disciples  moved.  But  it  is  still  more  difficult  to  invent  a 
consistent,  yet  diversified  series  of  actions  from  which  the 
character,  strongly  and  dislinclly  marked,  shall  naturally 
arise  to  the  view  of  the  reader.  Besides,  we  have  four  se- 
parate, memoirs,  evidently  written  without  any  concert  of 
their  authors,  which  still,  however,  present  to  us  the  same 
picture  of  life  and  manners. "^     A  biographical  picture,  thus 


*  JVritten  without  any  concert  of  their  authors  ;  •  for  although  they  present  to  ua 
nearly  the  same  transactions,  and  discourse.",  yet  it  is  not  done  with  Mia»  it'entity 
either  in  the  suhstance  of  tlie  narration,  or  the  order  of  time  which  would  indi- 
cate preconcert,  or  design.  On  the  other  hand,  we  perceive  such  differences  as 
would  naturally  occur  in  the  narratives  of  intelligent  and  hone.^t  men  <:ivin:,  af- 
ter 1  certain  interval  of  time,  the  history  of  tlie  smin  « vent*;,  without  an\  know- 
ledge of  each  other's  testimony,  or  any  study  to  make  thcw  accord  j  and  yet  mi\\ 


216 

depicleJ  sitaply  by  actions,  drawn  by  iiiea  whose  plain  and 
sound  understandings  enabled  them  only  to  exhibit  without 
embellishment  what  they  actually  saw  and  heard,  but  who 
vrere  utterly  incapable  of  dramatic  fiction,  carries  in  itself 
the  strongest  claims  to  be  received  as  genuine.  It  is,  be- 
sides, so  peculiar,  so  utterly  unlike  whatever  had  before 
been  exhibited  among  men  either  in  the  history  of  real  life, 
or  in  fiction,  that  it  can  never  be  conceived  to  be  the  mere 
creation  of  writers  who  were  wholly  incompetent  to  such  es- 
says of  genius  and  fancy.  In  every  view,  it  bears  the  irre- 
sistible impressions  of  truth  and  nature.  A  character,  how- 
worthy  the  messenger  of  peace,  and  salvation  to  mankind, 
who  claimed  the  high  and  holy  relation  of  being  the  Son  of 
God ! 

One  peculiarity  in  the  life  of  Jesus  Christ  especially  mer- 
its our  most  serious  consideration,  as  it  demonstrates  that  he 
could  not  have  acted  on  any  suggestions  of  human  policy  or 
wisdom.  In  order  to  place  it  in  its  just  light,  it  is  necessary 
again  to  carry  back  our  view  to  the  state  of  public  opinion  in 
the  Jewish  nation  at  that  period.  The  belief  that  the  com- 
ing of  the  Messiah  was  just  at  hand  was  then  strong  and  uni- 
versal.   The  Jews,  proud  of  their  exclusive  relation  to  God  as 


such  uniformit}' ,  and  such  consistency  in  the  whole  character,  even  when  one  in- 
troduces new  facts,  of  which  the  others  have  not  spoken,  as  clearly  demonstrates 
that  they  are  drawing  from  life,  and  that  they  all  hare  the  same  original  before 
them. 


217 

his  chosen  people,  and  impallentof  (he  yoke  which  haJ  lali 
ly  been  imposed  upon  (heoi  by  Ihe  Romans,  expected  In 
iheir  Messiah  a  martial  prince  and  a  conqueror,  wlio  should 
deliver  (hem  from  (lie  power  of  (heir  enemies,  and  enable 
(hem  (o  conquer  in  (heir  (urn.     In  such  a  state  of  (he  public 
sentiment  and  feeling,  impatient,  agita(ed,  anxious,  momen(- 
Ij  waiting  for  (he  appearance  of  some  grea(  deliverer,  many 
daring  spiri(s  would  naturally  arise  (o  offer  themselves  as  lead- 
ers in  (he  honourable  and  popular  en(erprise  of  rescuing  (he 
na(ion  from  ita  abjec(  humilladon,  and  raising  i(  (o  (ha(  splen- 
dor and  glory  bo  eagerly  an(!cipa(ed  by  every  Jew.     Minds 
of  a  fanadcal  and  enthusiastic  turn,  inflamed  to  a  degree  of 
insanity  by  sympathy  with  (he  general  fervor,  would  imagine 
Ihonselvcs  to  be  the  ins(rument3  destined  by  heaven  (o  ac- 
complish (his  glorious  purpose.     Whereas  others,  of  a  cold 
impiety,  but  of  a  bold  and  resolu(e  temper,  calculating  on 
(he  possibility  of  (urning  the  nadonal  ardor  (o  (heir  own  ag- 
grandizement, would  cherish  the  daring  ambition  of  usurping 
the  government  by  force  of  arms,  and  placing  themselves  oa 
the  throne  of  Judea.     But,  whether  actuated  by  a  spirit  of 
fanaticism,  or  imposture,  and  under  one  or  other  of  these 
classes  all  pretenders  must  be  ranged,  they  would  equally 
move  under  the  impulse  of  the  public  sentiment,  and  be  dl- 
lected  by  it  in  their  choice  of  the  means  to  accomnllsli  (heir 
end.     They  would,  (herefore,  always  appear  at  (he  head  of 
armed  bands.     And  such  was  the  fact,  according  to  (he  tcstl- 
mony  of  the  cotemporary  historian  .Tosephui?.     For,  of  all 


2J8 

the  nimieroiis  imposfors,  who  sprung  up  in  Jndea  prefend» 
iug  to  be  Messiah,  a  liille  before  fhe  ministry  of  our  SaviouFy 
and,  from  that  period,  till  the  final  destruction  of  Jerusaleaij 
Ihere  was  not  one  who  did  not  attempt  to  support  his  claim 
by  arms.  Not  so  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ.  He  deviated  en- 
iiiely  from  this  course,  which  nature  and  human  policy  would 
Lave  pointed  out  to  him,  and  chose  one  in  every  respect  op- 
posite. The  vain  and  proud  expectations  of  the  Jews  he 
refused  to  gratify.  He  openly  declared  that  his  kingdom  is 
not  of  this  world.  Instead  of  affecting  the  splendour  of  roy- 
ally, or  the  authority  of  command,  he  renounced  all  worldly 
pomp  and  grandeur.  Instead  of  the  weapons  of  force  and 
compulsion,  he  employed  only  the  meekness  of  instruction 
and  persuasion.  Instead  of  conciliating  the  favour  of  the 
Jewish  nation  by  courting  their  prejudices,  he  boldly  and 
openly  declared  to  them  (bat  their  national  policy,  and  even 
their  national  exislence  as  the  peculiar  people  of  God,  should 
goon  come  to  a  period.  Be  did  not  allure  his  disciples  to 
liis  party  by  the  prospects  of  honour,  emolument,  or  com- 
mand, but  by  inculcating  humility  and  self-denial,  and  pro- 
posing to  them,  in  his  service,  only  arduous  trials,  incessant 
persecutions,  and  unrewarded  kbours.  This  is  a  course 
which  not  only  nature,  and  human  wisdom  would  not  have 
pointed  out,  in  the  circumstances  in  which  he  chose  it,  but 
which  judging  on  all  the  acknowledged  principles  of  proba- 
bility, could  only  have  tended  to  ruin  his  hopes.  The  bum- 
ble, peaceful,  patient,  and  self-denied  character  which  he  as- 


219 

fsiimcd,  so  \vide1y  different  from  that  to  whlcb  the  spirit  of 
that  age  and  nation  would  have  urged  him,  aifords  ample  proof 
that  he  was  not  governed  by  any  maxims  of  worldly  policy. 
And  his  success,  notwithstanding  the  entire  detect  of  all  the 
measures,  or  precautions  which  human  wisdom  would  liave 
prescribed,  and  in  opposition  to  the  contempt,  the  indignation, 
and  power  of  a  whole  nation,  whose  wounded  prid€,  and  dis- 
appointed hopes,  had  inQamed  their  passions  to  a  degree  of  fu- 
ry which  threatened  to  crush  him,  and  all  his  designs  in  an  in- 
stant, supplies  the  strongest  presumption  that  tue  work  was 
not  of  men  but  of  God,  who,  with  a  silent,  but  irresistible  op- 
eration, often  confounds  the  counsels  of  the  wise,  and  defeats 
the  power  of  the  mighty,  and  conducts  the  designs  of  his  own 
providence,  by  secret,  and  inscrutable  springs,  to  the  most 
wonderful  and  unexpected  issues. 

Conformable  to  the  character  which  the  Saviour  assumed 
were  the  instruments  which  he  employed  to  propagate  his  re- 
ligion. He  chose  men  from  the  humblest  walks  of  life,  w  ith- 
out  power,  without  influence,  without  science,  without  elo- 
quence;  and  yet,  strictly  forbidding  every  attempt  to  extend 
his  doctrines  by  compulsion  and  force,  he  commanded  them 
to  rely  for  success  in  their  mission  simply  on  their  plain  un- 
varnished exposition  of  the  truth,  under  the  guidance  of  that 
divine  Spirit  which  he  promised  them  to  co-operate  with 
iheir  preaching.  What  could  be  expected,  on  every  ground 
of  human  calculation,  from  the  choice  of  such  instruments  for 


a  vroik  of  this  peculiar  nature,  and  of  such  infinite  magnitude 
and  difficulty,  but  failure  and  disgrace  ?  Could  men  in  their 
rank  of  life,  and  possessing  only  their  talents,  have  raised  their 
minds  to  such  a  mighty  enterprise  as  that  of  changing  the  moral 
state  of  the  whole  world  ?  If  they  had  been  bold  enough  to  ad- 
mit the  thought,  was  there  any  example  in  the  history  of  human 
events  which  could  have  encourged  the  smallest  hope  of  suc- 
cess ?  Yet,  we  have  seen  them,  in  obedience  to  the  command  of 
their  master,  although  with  reluctance  at  first,  under  the  con- 
sciousness of  their  impotence,  enter  on  this  astonishing  en- 
terprise ;  and  we  have  seen  it,  contrary  to  every  principle  of 
probable  reasoning,  gloriously  accomplished  in  their  hands. 
Well  may  we  ask,  then,  if  the  choice  of  such  instruments  is 
not  a  new  proof  that  our  blessed  Saviour  did  not  take  counr 
sel  of  human  wisdom,  nor  act  on  any  plan  that  the  cunning 
spirit  of  imposture  would  have  dictated  ?  And,  when  we  con- 
template the  wonderful  revolution  which  they  have  effected, 
does  not  the  conclusion,  almost  irresistibly,  force  itself  upon 
the  mind,  that  they  must  have  acted  under  a  divine  direc- 
tion r 

But,  omitting  all  other  arguments  of  the  presumptive  class, 
I  shall  only  further  offer  to  your  consideration  that  strong 
presumption  which  arises  from  the  effects  which  the  christian 
religion  has  had  on  the  interests,  and  happiness,  the  religious 
opinions,  morals  and  manners  of  society.  That  the  publica- 
tion of  the  gospel  has  produced  an  important  revolution  in 


221 

the  moral  and  religious  state  of  the  woiUl,  is  obvious  to  all 
who  have  sufficient  acquaintance  with  the  history  of  nations, 
and  of  human  nature,  to  be  able  to  compare  the  past  with  tin- 
present  :  and  that  this  revolution  has,  upon  the  whole,  been 
salutary,  and  has  contributed,  in  no  small  degree,  to  the  hap- 
piness of  mankind,  can  hardly  be  denied  by  any  well  inform- 
ed, and  candid  unbeliever. 

The  beneficial  elTects  of  the  christian  revelation  may  be 
considered  under  two  views  ;  the  great  and  visible  improve- 
Qient  of  the  world  in  religious  and  divine  knowledge  in  conse- 
quence of  the  prevalence  of  Christianity ;  and  the  practical 
improvement,  especially  of  the  christian  nations,  in  morals 
and  manners. 

Much  has  been  said  already,  on  the  great  superiority  of 
the  theological  and  moral  system  of  the  sacred  scriptures, 
above  all  that  philosophy  ever  taught  among  the  disciples  of 
human  wisdom,  or  superstition  ever  substituted  for  religion 
among  the  vulgar.  But  the  beneficial  influence  of  the  gos- 
pel is  not  to  be  looked  for  chiefly  among  men  of  science,  who 
form  but  a  small  portion  of  any  nation,  nor  to  be  measured 
principally  by  the  excellence  of  its  doctrines  compared  with 
the  institutions  of  philosophy,  but  by  the  illumination  which 
it  has  shed  through  the  great  mass  of  the  people.  In  this 
class,  who  were  once  thought  to  be  incapable  of  any  rational 
consideration  of  those  sublims  subjects,  do  we  not  now  find 


truer  notions  of  God,  purer  conceptions  of  the  worship  due 
(o  hira,  juster  principles  of  duty,  a  more  perfect  system  of 
the  rules  of  moral  conduct,  and  higher  and  nobler  motives  to 
enforce  those  rules  in  practice,  than  were  ever  known  even 
to  the  few  sages  who  appeared  here  and  there  like  stars  ia 
the  dark  night  of  paganism  ?  This  is  certainly  the  greatest 
and  sublimest  effect  which  has  ever  been  produced  by  naoral 
instruction.  No  where  do  we  now  behold  such  objects  of 
woi-shipas  Jupiter  or  Juno,  as  Mars  or  Apollo,  whose  Tices 
would  have  been  an  additional  stain  on  the  reputation  of  the 
most  immoral  of  their  worshippers.  Still  less  do  we  see  tem- 
ples erected  to  such  deities  as  Bacchus  or  Venus  ;  or  such 
ridiculous,  lewd,  and  beastly  sprites  as  Fauns  and  Satyrs,  as 
Priapus  and  Pan.  We  no  longer  witness  the  revels  of  a  holi- 
day substituted  for  the  pure  worship  of  Almighty  God, 
vhich  should  consist  in  solemn  acts  of  homage  and  venera- 
.tion  :  in  penitent  acknowledgments  of  our  sins,  in  devout  med- 
itations on  the  works  and  perfections  of  the  Creator,  in  grate- 
ful recollections  of  his  innumerable  mercies,  and  in  the  pious 
anticipation  of  those  heavenly  and  immortal  hopes  which  of- 
fer the  most  powerful  motives  to  the  true  believer  to  live  vir- 
tuously, and  form  his  best  preparation  to  die  peacefully. 
The  offices  of  religion,  that  were  performed  in  the  pagan 
temples  did  not,  in  any  country,  embrace  the  moral  instruc- 
tion of  the  people.  The  functions  of  the  priesthood  were  all 
fulBlled  in  the  regular  discharge  of  a  ritual  of  unmeaning,  or 
fantastic   ceremonies.     Piety  or  good  morals  were  not  eS" 


223 

teemed  requisite  even  to  the  sacerdotal  character.  How 
different  are  those  pious  offices  which  are  performed  in  our 
christian  temples  !  What  a  school  are  they  become  to  the 
people  of  that  knowledge  most  important  to  the  interests  and 
happiness  of  mankind  !  With  what  advantages  in  the  church, 
that  is,  under  the  immediate  inspection  and  authority  of  Al- 
mighty God,  are  they  initiated  in  that  most  perfect  discipline 
which  embraces  the  whole  compass  of  their  duties  to  God 
and  man,  and  provides  most  certainly  for  the  happiness  both 
of  their  present,  and  their  future  being  !  Idolatry,  with  its 
impious  and  immoral  train,  has  been  banished  from  all  its  an- 
cient seats  in  the  civilized  world.  For  Christianity  has  in 
this,  and  in  many  other  respects,  extended  a  salutary  influ- 
ence far  beyond  the  nations  embraced  within  its  actual  pale. 

If  Christianity  has  introduced  into  the  great  mass  of  socie- 
ty a  more  perfect  knowledge,  than  they  enjoyed  before,  of 
those  moral  and  divine  principles  most  useful  and  important  (o 
the  practical  understanding  and  discharge  of  all  their  duties^ 
it  has,  in  the  same  proportion,  opened  the  true  sources  of 
enjoy  Qient  to  all  who  sincerely  embrace  and  believe  its  doc- 
trines. Their  happy  influence  will  be  perceived  by  a  good 
man  in  every  situation  wherein  he  can  be  placed,  in  the  com- 
posure of  his  spirit,  in  the  sense  of  the  continual  presence, 
favour,  and  protection  of  Almighty  God,  in  that  6!lal  affec- 
tion and  trust  with  which  he  confides  in  the  divine  mercy, 
and  that  security  with  which  the  spirit  of  faith  reposes  on 


224 

the  friie  foundation  of  our  eternal  hopes.     Bui  tlie  gracious 
and  beneficent  power  of  the  gospel,  and  the  precioiisness  of 
its  consolations,  will  be  pcculiarlj  felt  under  the  various  af- 
flictions which  God  hath  found  it  necessary  or  useful  to  in- 
troduce into  the  discipline  of  our  present  state  of  probation* 
There   are   comforts  in  religion  which  can  enable  the  pious 
heart  to  throw  oflf  the  pressure  of  all  its  sorrows.     But,  that 
I  may  not  enter  too  far  into  disquisitions  which  would  bet- 
ter become  the  pulpit,  I  will  confine  myself  briefly  to  point 
out  the  consolation  and  support  it  affords  the  soul  at  the  ap- 
proach of  death.     The  weakness  of  human  nature,  if  it  is 
not  supported  by  religious  hope,  commonly  meets  this  awful 
term  of  our  earthly  existence  with  extreme  solicitude.     And 
the  consciousness  of  guilt,  which  is  apt  to  be  awakened  in  the 
heart  when  we  are  approaching  the  presence  of  the  Supreme 
Judge,  and  when  all  the  illusions  of  the  passions  and  the 
world,    which    had   diverted   reflection,    are    passed  away, 
greatly  aggravates  to  most  men  the  distress  of  dying.  Their 
utter  ignorance  of  all  that  is  beyond  this  life,  and  the  fearful 
apprehensions  natural  to  weakness  and  guilt,   of  what  may 
take  place  hereafter,  must  often  agitate  with  terror,  or  hang 
with  peculiar  heaviness,  on  the  departing  spirit  which  is  not 
enlightened  by  revelation.     The  polite  and  learned   nations 
of  antiquity,  although  they  had  some  notions  of  the  existence  of 
the  soul  after  the  dissolution  of  the  body,  and  some   appre- 
hensions of  a  future  retribution  to  virtue,  and  to  vice,  yet  had 
framed  no  clear  and  satisfactory  ideas  on  these  subjects  on 


225 

which  reason  could  rely:  all  their  representations  of  the 
state  of  departed  souls,  therefore,  were  melancholy  and 
gloomy  in  the  extreme.  What  ineffable  consolation,  then, 
has  the  gospel  brought  to  countless  millions  of  the  human 
race  ?  What  comfort  has  it  shed  upon  the  hour  of  death  ? 
what  illumination  on  the  darkness  of  the  tomb,  by  bring- 
ing life  and  immortalily  to  light !  It  has  pointed  out, 
through  Jesus  Christ,  the  way,  at  once,  to  a  happy  death, 
and  to  the  certain  hope  of  a  blessed  and  eternal  existence. 
To  the  real  christian,  who  believes  its  promises,  and  confides 
in  its  hopes,  the  comforts  which  it  sheds  on  this  most  inter- 
esting crisis  of  our  being  are  beyond  every  estimate  which 
can  be  formed  of  their  value,  and  must  greatly  strengthen  in 
his  heart  that  faith  which  has  been  created  and  nourished 
there  by  its  holy  doctrines. 

Suffer  me  now  to  conclude  these  evidences  with  an  obser- 
Talion  which  is  of  great  importance  in  order  to  a  just  view  of 
the  influence  of  the  christian  system  on  the  general  happiness 
of  the  world.  Although  the  knowledge  of  its  divine  truths 
has  not  been  actually  communicated  to  all  nations ;  yet  it 
teaches  us  to  believe  that  the  whole  human  race  do,  in  a  very 
great  degree,  participate  in  its  blessings.  From  the  moment 
of  the  fall  of  our  original  parent,  and  the  merciful  promise  of 
that  heavenly  seed  who,  from  the  beginning  was  destined  to 
repair  the  evils  of  his  transgression,  tiie  world  has  been  placed 

under  an  administration  of  grace  in  tin  hands  of  ('-'    ^^  ■  'v 

29 


326 

lor,  siiiled  \o  its  degenerate  condition.     And  now,  in  conse- 
quence of  Ihe  atonement  made  by  the  Lamb  slain  from  the 
foundation  of  the  worlds  and  of  the  assistance  of  the  holy- 
Spirit,  which  through  the  one  oblation  offered  on  the  cross, 
has  been  imparted  to  all  men  to  direct  and  strengthen  the  dic- 
tates of  conscience  in  their  breasts,  salvation  has  been  render- 
ed possible  to  sincere  repentance,  and  regeneration  of  heart 
in  every  age,  and  in  every  nation,  even  where  the  name  of 
Jesus  Christ  has  not  been  explicitly  revealed.*     For  the  ho- 
ly apostle  Peter  hath  taught  us,  what  a  heavenly  vision  re- 
vealed to  him ;  that,  through  the  death  and  mediation  of  the 
ever  blessed  Saviour,  in  every  nation,  he  that  feareth  God, 


*  The  pious  nien  in  the  patriarchal  ages,  and  generally  in  the  ancient  world^ 
could  have  had  no  definite,  and  evangelical  apprehensions  of  t!ie  character  of  the 
Saviour,  notwithstanding  it  was  through  the  efficacy  of  his  atonement  that  they 
had  access  to  God,  and  by  his  Spirit  they  were  sanctified.  The  same  Spirit  is  im- 
partid,  in  a  degree,  to  the  heathen  world,  ia  every  age,  who,  applying  with  a  di- 
vine efficacy  the  law  of  nature  to  the  consciences  of  men,  becomes,  to  many  among 
them  a  principle  of  sincere  repentance  and  regeneration  of  heart. 

The  Rev.  Mr.  Braiuerd  in  the  journal  of  his  mission  among  the  Indians,  relates 
a  striking  anecdote,  very  much  to  the  present  point,  of  an  aged  man  whom  he  met 
with,  who,  in  his  original  state  of  healhenism,  had  gained,  from  his  own  reflec- 
tions, and  the  exercises  of  his  own  heart,  under  the  influence  of  that  divine  Spirit 
which  he  acknowledged,  an  acquaintance  witli  the  most  important  practical  princi- 
ples of  real  piety,  as  far,  probably,  as,  without  the  explicit  knowledge  of  the  Me- 
idiator,  and  the  atonement,  they  were  generally  attained  even  by  the  best  men  in 
the  ancient  and  patriarchal  world.  Mr,  Brainerd,  after  free  and  repeated  con- 
versations with  liim  on  the  most  practical  subjects  of  religion,  declares  that  if  he 
thou;iht  it  possible  for  a  heathen  to  be  a  truly  pious  man,  without  the  direct  know- 
ledge of  Jesus  Christ,  he  would  have  concluded  this  Indian  to  be  such.  In  this 
remark,  indeed,  we  perceive  a  certain  illiberality  of  opinion,  which,  considering 
the  powerful  effect,  on  many  minds,  of  (he  prejudices  of  education,  is,  perhaps, 
rather  to  be  lamented  than  severely  censured.  This  pious  missionary  forgot  the 
reasoning  of  Saint  Paul  in  the  third  chapter  of  his  eiiistle  lo  the  Roman?, 


22r 

and  ivorketh  righfeoiisnesSf  is  accepted  with  him.  This  h 
the  foundation  of  our  hope  with  regard  to  the  pious  men  of 
the  ancient  world:  and  on  the  same  grounds  may  we  still 
build  a  reasonable  hope,  that  thQ3e  distant  corners  of  the 
earth,  which  seem  covered  with  the  profoundest  darkness^ 
preserve,  at  all  times,  many  of  the  chosen  vessels  of  mercy. 
And,  although  the  sun  of  righteousness  has  not  yet  lifted  hia 
beams  on  all  nations,  we  have  reason  to  believe  that  he  is  in 
his  glorious  progress ;  and  that  as  the  plans  of  divine  provi- 
dence are  hastening  to  their  full  development,  the  gospel  will 
shortly  be  extended  along  with  the  improvements  of  civili- 
zation and  science,  over  the  whole  earth,  and  involve  all  na- 


Will  it  be  asked,  what  advantages  then,  If  the  principle  which  has  bacn  statcf^ 
above  be  just,  iiavc  the  christian  nations  over  those  who  enjoy  only  the  faint  glini- 
merings  of  the  light  of  nature?  I  answer,  tliat,  although  noen,  who  enjoy  only  the 
imperfect  lights  of  nature,  together  witli  those  gleams  of  original  truth  whicii 
have  been  preserved  by  a  tradition  that  is  not  yet  entirely  extinct  among  any 
people,  may,  through  repentance  and  saoctification  of  the  Spirit,  be  saved  by  a 
Redeemer  whom  they  have  not  distinctly  known,  yet  mast  they  be  subject,  through 
life,  to  many,  and  distressing  doubts  and  anxieties  which  the  native  weakness  of 
human  reason  is  unable  to  resolve.  Besides  the  nations  who  enjoy  the  blessed 
light  of  the  gospel  possess  much  clearer  and  more  ample  means  of  knowledge  and 
of  grace,  more  efficient  motives  of  duty,  more  consoling  hopes,  than  those  who  are 
left  to  the  obscure  teachings  of  reason  unenlightened  by  revelation.  And,  it 
such  means  and  motives  have  in  their  own  nature,  and  independently  on  the  more 
abundant  influences  of  the  divine  Spirit,  which  accompany  them  under  the  chris- 
tian dispensation,  a  powerful  tendency  to  promote  the  spirit,  and  to  advance  th? 
interests  of  piety  and  virtue,  how  greatly  must  the  numbers  of  pious  men  be  mul- 
tiplied under  the  full  illumination  of  the  Sun  of  righteousness  ? 

To  these  reflections  it  may  be  added,  that  if  higher  degrees  of  purity,  and  sanc- 
tity of  heart  and  life  be  the  natural  result  of  the  clearer  lights,  and  nobler  privi- 
leges of  the  gospel,  a  principle  most  reasonable  in  itself,  will  it  not  follow  likewise, 
that  prOi)Ortionably  richer  and  more  glorious  rewards  siiall  crown  the  obedience- 
ci"  the  sincere  christian  in  the  everlasting  presence  of  his  Redeerncrp 


228 

lions  in  (he  splendour  of  his  rays.  When  this  blessed  era 
shall  arrive,  shall  we  not  find  an  abundant  compensation  for 
the  partial  darkness,  or  the  feeble  dawn,  which  has  so  long 
overspread  the  world,  not  only  in  the  superior  duration,  but 
in  the  superior  glory  of  that  period,  when,  to  use  the  beautiful 
and  expressive  figure  of  the  prophet,  the  light  of  the  moon 
ihall  be  as  the  ligrht  of  the  sun.  and  the  light  of  the  sun  shall 
he  sevenfold,  as  the  light  of  seven  days. 


THE  TRINITY 

OR 

THREEFOLD  EXISTENCE  OF  THE  DEITY« 


In  enlering  on  the  investigation  of  the  peculiar  doctrines  of 
revelation,  the  first  object  which  meets  our  attention  is  the 
Trinity,  or  Threefold  Existence  of  the  Deity. 

The  existence  of  God  is  equally  the  foundation  of  natu- 
ral and  revealed  Religion.  But  in  the  sacred  scriptures 
it  assumes  an  aspect  new  and  peculiar.  The  Holy  Spirit 
has  revealed  in  them  a  modification  of  the  divine  essence  un- 
known to  tlie  lights  of  nature.  Its  unity  indeed,  is  not  im- 
paired ;  but  we  are  taught  to  believe  in  the  coexistence  of 
three  infinite,  eternal  and  equal  natures  or  persons  in  one 
most  holy  and  undivided  Godhead.  As  this  is  a  doctrine 
entirely  beyond  the  discoveries  of  human  reason,  it  is  our  du- 
ty to  receive  it  simply  as  a  revealed /ad,  without  attempting 
too  curiously  to  pry  into  the  inscrutable  mode  of  this~^  divine 
union,  which  must  transcend  the  comprehension  of  our 
minds.  Perhaps,  however,  it  is  not  farther  bej  ond  our  intel- 
lectual capacities  to  form  distinct  conceptions  of  a  Trinity  in 
tmioD,  than  it  is  clearly  to  conceive  of  God  himself  as  pre- 


230 

sented  to  our  thoughts  by  natural  religion.  Each  of  his  per- 
fections offers  to  the  mind  impenetrable  difficulties,  and,  in 
many  of  their  circumstances,  apparent  contradictions.  The 
christian  system  embraces  three  infinite  subsistences,  or  per- 
sons, equally  the  objects  of  divine  worship  ;  and  all  included 
in  one  self-existent  and  eternal  essence,  only  sustaining  dif- 
ferent relations  to  mankind.  This  doctrine  justly  excites 
our  wonder,  and  confounds  the  imbecility  of  our  minds. 
But  we  are  not  without  an  analogy  in  our  own  nature  to  facil- 
itate our  conception  of  the  possibility  of  the  fad.  1  he  un- 
derstanding, the  will,  and  the  affections,  often  enter  equally 
into  the  acts  of  the  soul ;  yet,  so  that  we  do  not  discern  ia 
each  operation  of  the  intellect,  volition,  or  affection  only  a 
third  part  of  its  force  ;  but  we  perceive  that  the  whole  soul  is 
exerted  in  the  act,  and  the  power  of  each  principle  is  as  the 
entire  energy  of  the  soul.  It  would,  indeed,  be  impious  to 
imagine  that  the  human  mind  affords  any  adequate  type  of 
the  Supreme  and  Infinite  Spirit,  but  it  certainly  yields  an 
analogy  by  which  our  conceptions  may  be  aided  of  three 
distinct  and  equal  powers  in  one  simple  and  undivided  es- 
sence in  which  the  energy  of  the  whole  is  exerted  in  the 
operations  of  each. 

Those  who  are  unfriendly  to  the  evangelic  system  often 
reproach  believers  on  this  subject,  as  receiving  a  doctrme 
that  is  unreasonable  only  because  it  is  above  the  investiga- 
tion of  reason.     This  is  a   distinction  which  cannot  fail  to 


i# 


231 

meet  the  thinking  mind  in  the  contemplation  of  innurnerablt; 
subjects  in  nature.     We  see  tlie  fact,  but  we  cannot  under- 
stand the  manner  of  its  existence,   nor  free  it  from  inexplica- 
ble difficulties  which  equally  embarrass  the  wise  and  the  ig- 
norant.    Who  can  explain  the  ubiquity  of  God,   without  ex- 
tension or  division  of  parts  ?   Who  can  reconcile  his   immu- 
tability, and  the  steadfastness  of  nature  with  the  promises  of 
his  protection  to  good  men  ?    Or  who  render  free  from  the 
most    embarrassing    perplexities  two  of    the  most  evident 
truths,  the  perfect  liberty  of  human  action,  and  the  infallible 
foreknowledge,   and  preordination   of  events,    the  one,  the 
most  obvious  dictate  of  experience,   the  other,  among  the 
most   certain  principles  of  science  ?  In  any  revelation  from 
God  concerning  himself,  have  we  not  the  justest  grounds  to 
expect   many  discoveries  which  would  otherwise,  have  far 
transcended  the  discoveries,  and,  perhaps,  the  distinct  con- 
ceptions of  our  reason.     We  must  judge  with  infinite  imper- 
fection or  absurdity  of  the  divine  nature,  if  we  receive  no 
revelation  concerning  it  but  what  we  can  measure  by  the  fee- 
ble powers  of  the  human  intellect. — On  such  transcendant 
subjects  when  convinced  that  God  has  spoken,  it  is  the  first 
duty  of  a  christian  to  receive  implicitly  the  declarations  of 
his  holy  word,  without  any  attempt  to  bring  them  down  to  the 
level  of  our  own  minds. 

It  is  a  natural  inquiry,  which  has  been  often  made,  whence 
can  arise  any  moral  benefit  from  the  revelation  of  a   TnV 


232 

ity,  when  it  is  confessed  that  human  reason  is  incapable  of 
conceiving  the  mode  of  the  divine  existence  ?  I  answer  that 
the  utility  of  this  revelation  is  precisely  similar  to  that  which 
is  derived  from  the  knowledge  of  the  being  of  God.     The 
belief  presents  to  our  ideas  a  Legislator  and  a  Judge,  an  ob- 
ject of  worship  and  of  holy  fear,  a  law  of  duty,  and  the  most 
powerful  sanction  of  that  law.     For,  although  we  cannot  dis- 
tinctly conceive  of  the  divine  nature,  nor  expand  the  mind  to 
the  comprehension  of  infinite  perfection ;  yet  as   far  as  is 
competent  to  all  the  purposes  of  piety  and  virtue,  we  are 
able  to  understand  the  relations  of  his  justice,  his  power,  his 
wisdom,  and  his  goodness,  to  us  as  moral  beings.     In  like 
manner,  although  the  threefold  existence  of  the  Deity  is  most 
mysterious  and  inscrutable,  yet  the  belief  of  this  doctrine,  as 
it  is  revealed,  offers  God  to  the  understanding  and  the  heart, 
in  the  threefold  relation  of  our  Creator,  our  Saviour,  and  the 
Illuminator  and  Banctifier  of  our  nature ; — in  one  word,  as  the 
Moral  Governor  of  the  world  in  reference  to  our  redemption. 
These  relations  can  be  clearly  understood  by  man,  and  arc 
infinitely  important  to  him,  as  an  offending  creature,  to  be 
known.     In  them  lies  all  his  consolation,  and  the  foundatioa 
of  his  hope  for  eternal  life. 


232 


VESTIGES  OF  THIS    DOCTRINE   HANDED  DOWN  BI 

TRADITION    AMONG    ALL   THE  CIVILIZED 

NATIONS    OF  ANTI'viOITY^. 

When  God  had  formed  the  father  of  our  race  with  rational 
and  moral  powers  which  filled  hiii)  to  be  tlic  iiintnictor  and 
governor  of  tlie  world,  it  is  a  reasonable  presumption  thai  lie 
should,  at  Ihe  same  time,  impart  such  a  knowledge  of  hiaiself 
as  should  be  requisite  to  the  discharge  of  every  duty  which 
he  owed  to  Heaven.  And  certain  it  is,  that,  as  a  pious  parent, 
he  would  affectionately  and  zealously  communicate  the  pre- 
cious treasure  to  his  immediate  offspring.  For  the  same  reason, 
information  so  important  to  religion,  and  to  society,  would  be 
disseminated  by  the  great  ancestor  of  luii'  kind  after  the  del- 
uge among  Ihe  various  nations  springing  from  him;  the  know- 
ledge, indeed,  communicated  by  tradition,  however  important 
it  may  be  to  human  happiness  or  duly,  loses,  in  the  lapse  of 
time,  much  of  its  precision  and  accuracy,  and  becomes  mixed 
with  fable.  Yet  in  the  multiplied  changes  of  mankljid,  if  the 
principle,  which  has  just  been  stated,  be  well  founded,  we 
may  expect  to  find  many  traces  of  a  doctrine  so  infimatel/ 
blended  with  the  first  principles  of  piety  ;  especially  in  those 
countries  whose  moral  history  reaches  nearest  to  the  era  of 
the  deluge. — And  we  do  accordingly  discern,  in  the  records 
of  ancient  learning,  vestiges  of  this  doctrine  which  are  sur- 
prisingly clear,  and  more  uiifum  among  people  so  remotely 

30 


234 

dispersed  from  each  other,  than  could  have  been  derived 
from  any  other  source,  than  the  common  parent  of  the  race. 
Orpheus,  whose  name  is  apt  to  be  mingled,  in  our  ideas,  only 
trith  fat)le8,  but  who  was  a  great  legislator,  and  the  oldest  of 
the  Grecian  poets,  as  well  as  the  civilizer  of  all  the  north  of 
Greece,  speaks  agreeably  to  the  accurate  researches  of  the 
Chevalier  Ramsay,  of  the  highest  of  all  beings  under  the  de- 
nominations of  light,  understanding,  and  life,  which  were  said 
to  express  the  powers  of  the  same  Deity,  the  Maker  of  all. 
And  Cudworth,  quoting  Timotheus,  informs  us,  [Intellect. 
Sjyst.  ch.  4.]  that  Orpheus  denominated  the  three  powers  of 
the  divine  nature  Ouranos,  Ciuonos,  and  Phanes,  the  two  for- 
mer names  of  Greek  origin,  the  latter  an  Egyptian  word  signi- 
fying Love  ;  and  the  whole  not  widely  diflfering  in  the  force 
of  the  terms  from  those  already  j,roduced  from  the  Chevalier 
Ramsay.  Pythagoras  is  known  by  all  acquainted  with  Grecian 
lileralure,  to  have  mainlained  a  Trhiity  of  divine  persons. 
His  philosophy  he  derived  from  Egypt,  Chaldea,  Persia  and 
India,  where  similar  doctrines  prevailed.  And  we  learn  from 
Moderatus,  who  was  a  disciple  of  his  school,  that  a  fundamen- 
tal maxim  of  his  theology  was  "  that  God  is  one,  and  from 
him  proceed  two  infinite  beings :"  which  maxim  he  explains 
and  expands  in  the  following  words—"  Thejirst  one  is  above 
all  beings,  the  Second  contains  all  ideas,  tlie  Third,  which 
he  call-  ;fc;v5cv  or  Soul,  parlaketh  of  both."  Jamblichus,  the 
%mous  aiiitt^oaist  of  the  christians  says  **  that,  like  thewy  there 


were  three  Gods  praised  by  (he  Pythas^oreans.  And  one* 
of  the  philosophers  of  this  school  denoininales  the  second  of 
these  deiries  "  Ihe  Heavenly  and  Sensible  God." — The 
Trinity  of  Plato  is  slill  better  known,  the  different  persons  of 
which  he  styled  ''ro  Agathon  or  Heno  Nous  or  Logos  and 
He  Psuche  or  Hevos,  interprete(J,  the  Good  or  the  One — the 
Mind  or  Reason,  and  the  Soul  or  Love. 

Fro/n  the  philosopher,  already  quoted,  we  learn  that  the 
traditions  of  the  ancient  Egyptians  acknowledge  Eineph  as 
the  author  of  truth,  and  creator  of  the  world  ;  but  before 
Eineph  they  place  the  first  Intelligent  and  Intelligible  Being, 
who  can  be  adored  only  in  silence,  denominated  Eiklon;  but 
after  both  is  Ptha,  or  that  Spirit  which  animates  all  things  by 
its  vivifying  flame.  Eusebius  remarks,  that  the  hieroglyphic 
of  the  Deity  in  that  nation  was  a  winged  globe,  with  a  serpent 
emerging  from  its  orb.  Of  which  symbol  Sanchoniatho,  \tt 
the  fragments  preserved  by  that  author,  gives  the  following 
explanation; — "The  globe  signifies  the  first  self-existent 
Being,  without  beginning,  and  without  end  ; — The  serpent  is 
the  einblem  of  divine  wisdom  and  creative  power ;  and  the 
wings,  of  that  active  spirit  which  animates  the  universe."  la 
corroboration  of  this  tradition,  it  was  the  received  interpreta- 
tion of  their  priests  that  the  triangular  obelisks  erected  at  the 
entrance  of  all  their  temples  were  symbols  of  the  divine 
nature. 

♦  HicrocIcFi 


236 

P^«5!^ino"  to  o^her  nations,   Plutarch  lias  preserved  a  fracli- 
lion  ol  ihe  Peibian  theology,  that  their  supreme  Deity  Oro- 
ma  «les  thrice  augiriented  himself;  and  he  records  a  ceiebra- 
te.l  festival  of  the  Magian  priests  in  honor  of  the  threefold 
Mvthras;    the  names  of  whom  were  Oromasdes,    Mythras, 
and  Mythra.     Since  the  presidency  of  Sir  William  Jones  in 
India  the  exislence  of  a  supreme  Trinity  in  the  Mythology 
of  the  Braniins  is  plainly  discerned  in  the  midst  of  their  in- 
numerable Gods,  and  symbols,  the  belief  of  which  has  been 
preserved    among   them    from  the    most    remote  antiquity. 
And   the   European   missionaries  to  China  have  discovered 
Tisible  traces  of  the   sanie  doctrine  existing  among  that  an- 
cient peofile. — Such  a  striking  coincidence  in  this  important 
principle  of  religion  among  various  nations,   so  remotely  sit- 
uated from  each  other,  ce  tainly  points  to  some  common  ori- 
gin, which  can  hardly  be  presumed  to  be  any  other  than  that 
which  has  already  been  suggested. 

These  reflections  will  be  considered,  I  presume,  to  derive 
no  inconsiderable  countenance  and  support  from  similar  ones 
made  by  that  eminent  divine  and  scholar,  Dr.  Horsley, 
Bi?*hop  of  St.  Asaph,  in  a  charge  to  the  clergy  of  the  arch- 
deaconry of  St.  Albans.  Speaking  of  the  similitude,  in  ma- 
ny points,  of  the  Trinity  of  the  platonic  school  to  the  chris- 
tian doctrine :  The  resemblance,  says  he,  may  seem  indeed 
a  wonderful  fact,  which  may  justly  draw  the  attention  of  the 
serious  and  inquisitive;  and  it  becomes  more  importantj 


when  it  is  discovered  that  these  notions  were  by  no  means 
pecuhar  lo  the  pbioiiic  school ;  that  the  platonists  preiend- 
ed  to  be  no  more  (han  the  expositors  of  a  more  ancient  doc- 
trine, which  is  traced  from  Plato  to  Parriienides ;  froin  Par- 
menides  to  his  masters  of  the  Pythagorean  sect ;  from  ihe 
Pythagoreans  lo  Orpheus,  (he  earhest  of  the  Grecian  Mya- 
tagogues;  from  Orpheus  to  the  secret  lore  of  the  Egyptian 
priests,  in  which  the  foundafions  of  the  Orphic  theology- 
were  laid.  Similar  notions  of  a  triple  principle  pievailed  in 
the  Persian  and  Chaldean  theology  ;  and  vestiges  even  of  the 
worship  of  a  Trinity,  were  discernible  in  the  Roman  super- 
stition io  a  very  late  age.  This  worship  the  Romans  re- 
ceived from  their  Trojan  ancestors  ;  for  the  Tiojans  brought 
it  with  them  into  Ilaly  from  Phrygia.  In  Phrygia  it 
Was  introduced  by  Dardanus  so  early  as  the  ninth  Centu 
ry  after  Noah's  flood.  Dardanus  carried  it  with  him 
from  Samothrace ;  where  the  personages  that  were  the 
objects  of  it  were  worshipped  under  the  Blebrew  name 
of  Cabirim.  Who  these  Cabirim  might  be,  has  been 
matter  of  unsuccessful  inquiry  to  many  learned  men.  The 
Utmost  that  is  known  with  certainty  is,  that  they  were  ori- 
ginally three,  and  were  called  by  way  of  eminence  the  Great 
or  Mighty  ones ;  for  that  is  the  import  of  the  Hebrew  name* 
And  of  the  like  import  is  their  latin  appellation  PenateSy  &c. 
Thus  the  joint  worship  of  Jupiter,  Juno  and  Minerva,  the 
Triad  of  the  Roman  Capitol,  is  traced  to  that  of  the  Three 
Mifrhty  Ones  in  Samothrace  ;  which  was  established  in  that 
island,  at  what  precipe  time  it  is  ioipossibie  to  determine,  but 


Qariier,  if  Euscbiua  is  (o  be  credited,  than  the  days  of 
Abraham. 

The  notion,  therefore,  of  a  Trinity  more  or  less  removed 
from  the  purity  of  the  christian  faith,  is  found  to  be  a  leading 
principle  in  all  the  ancient  schools  of  philosophy,  and  in  ihe 
reliscions  of  almost  all  nations  ;  and  traces  of  an  early  popular 
belief  of  it  appear  even  in  the  abominable  rites  of  idolatrous 
worship.  If  reason  was  insufficient  for  this  great  discovery, 
what  could  be  the  means  of  information,  but  what  the  pla- 
tonists  themselves  assign,  ^sonet^ccSoIci  esoXoyia — A  theology 
delivered  from  the  Gods,  i  e.  a  revelation.  This  is  the 
account  which  the  platonists,  who  were  no  christians,  have 
given  of  the  origin  of  their  master's  doctrine.  But  from 
wh it  revelation  could  they  derive  their  infor  nation,  who  lir* 
ed  before  the  christian,  and  had  no  light  from  the  mosaic  ? 
For,  whatever  some  of  the  early  fathers  may  have  imagined, 
there  is  no  evidence  that  Plato  or  Pythagoras  were  at  all  ac- 
quainted with  the  mosaic  writings:  not  io  insist,  that  the 
worship  of  a  Trinity  is  traced  to  an  earlier  age  than  that  of 
Plato  or  Pythagoras,  or  even  of  Moses.  Their  information 
could  only  be  drawn  from  traditions  founded  upon  earlier 
revelations ;  from  scattered  fragments  of  the  ancient  patriar- 
chal creed  ;  that  creed  which  was  universal  before  the  de- 
fection of  the  first  idolaters ;  which  the  corruptions  of  idola- 
try, gross  and  enormous  as  they  were,  could  never  totally  ob- 
fiterate*     Thus  the  doctrine  of  the  Trinity  h  rather  cojf* 


239 

firmed  than  discredifetl  by  the  suffrage  of  the  heathen  sages; 
sinre  the  resemblance  of  the  Christian  faiih,  and  ihc  Pagan 
philosophy  in  tlii?  article,  when  fairly  infrrpteted,  appears  to 
be  nothing  less  than  the  consent  of  the  earliest,  and  the  latest 
revelations. 

An  objection  has  been  raised  against  this  presumptive  evi- 
dence, as  it  may  be  called  in  favour  of  the  doctrine,  and  not 
without  much  appearance  of  plausibility,  arising  from  the 
supposed  silence  of  the  scriptures  of  the  Old  Testauient. 
This  silence,  however,  is  more  apparent  than  real,  as  will  ea- 
sily be  discerned  by  the  attentive  reader,  in  the  revelations 
made  to  the  ancient  patriarchs.  That  celebrated  and  ingen* 
ious  critic  who  has  been  already  quoted  more  than  once,  but 
who  perhaps  has  pushed  this  opinion  beyond  the  truth  of 
fact,  thinks  he  discovers  the  different  persons  of  the  adorable 
Trinity  as  distinctly  designated  in  Ihe  writings  of  Moses  as 
in  those  of  the  apostles.  Of  the  living  and  true  God  this  great 
legislator  of  Israel  speaks  under  the  peculiar  appellation  of  Je- 
hovah; but  he  exhibits  him  to  that  nation  under  the  thieetold 
denoininations  of  Jehovah — Ab, — the  self-existent  Father; 
Jehovah — El, — the  self  existent  Teacher  or  IIlumin;itor  ;  and 
Jehovah-^ Ruach,  or  the  self-existent  Spirit.  And  Elohira^ 
tinder  which  denomination  the  Eternal  is  so  often  spoken  of, 
by  Moses,  is  the  plural  of  Eloah,  and  indicates  plurality  of  ex- 
istence. You  cannot  serve  Jehovah,  says  the  author  of  the 
book  of  Joshua,  for  he  is  the  holy  Elohim ;  which  literally 


246 

translated  if?,  you  cannot  serve  the  Self- Existent,  for  he  is 
the  holy  Gods*  And  this  is  only  one  example  out  of  many 
throughout  the  sacred  writings.  Hence  the  Jews,  as  ap« 
pears,  by  the  oldest  commentators  on  their  law,  seem  at  all 
periods  io  have  entertained  this  principle.  And  in  the  time  of 
our  Saviour,  they  were  evidently  not  offended  at  his  doctrine 
of  the  Father,  the  Son,  and  the  Holy  Spirit;  but  at  the  pre- 
sumption, as  they  supposed,  of  his  making  himself  the  Son 
ef  God  ;  thereby,  making  himself  equal  with  God, 

Such  have  been  the  doctrines,  or  traditions  concerning  the 
divine  existence  cherished  in  the  most  distinguished  nations  of 
the  ancient  world.  And  it  is  far  from  being  an  improbable 
conjecture  that  they  contributed  in  no  small  degree,  to  prepare 
the  minds  of  mankind  for  the  favourable  reception  of  the  true 
doctrine  on  this  subject,  when  it  was  revealed  by  our  blessed 
Saviour. 

But  so  various  is  the  human  mind  in  the  strength  of  its 
powers,  and  the  diversity  of  its  fancies,  or  prepossessions,  that 
it  tioon  became  divided  into  different  systems  in  interpreting 
the  sacred  standard  transmitted  to  us  by  Christ,  and  his 
apostles.  Many  crude  notions  seemed  to  rise  and  fall  almost 
at  the  same  moment,  in  the  primitive  church,  being  only  the 
transient  ebullitions  of  a  fanatical  fancy,  arising  from  the 
fermentation  of  ancient  opinions  with  the  new  principles  im- 
perfectly understood.     A  multitude  of  these  errors  are  en- 


241 

uumerafed  by  ail  the  ecclesiastical  historians,  who  merely  re- 
cord Iheir  existence  ami  their  extinction.  But  not  having 
been  embraced  by  any  permanent  sect  in  the  church,  they 
merit  httle  rec;ard  ;  and  are  hardly  entitled  even  to  be  men- 
tioned in  a  system  like  the  present.  A  few  only  ol"  (hose 
whose  leaders  have  been  moie  distinguished  by  their  talents, 
or  have  made  more  extended  divisions  ansong  the  body  of 
christians  I  will  recall  to  the  notice  of  my  readers,  merely 
stating  their  peculiar  and  discriminating  ideas  upon  this  sub- 
ject, with  such  conciseness  as  the  brevity  of  this  work  re- 
quires. 

The  Sabellians,  who  take  their  denomination  from  a  mail 
respectable  for  his  learning  and  talents,  maintain  the  unity  of 
God  in  the  strictest  sense  ;  and  interpret  ilie  titles  of  the  Fa- 
ther, the  Son,  and  the  Holy  Ghost,  as  expressive  only  of  the 
different  relations  of  Creator,  Redeemer,  and  Moral  Govera- 
or,  which  he  sustains  to  mankind  in  the  economy  of  their  re- 
demption. Considering  the  extreme  obscurity  of  our  ideas 
upon  this  infinite  subject,  their  error,  acknowledging  as  they 
do,  the  Deity  of  our  Saviour,  cannot  be  regarded  as  one  that 
deeply  affects  the  system  of  our  hol^  religion.  The  Tri- 
theists,  conceiving  that  they  would  do  gi  eater  honour  to  the 
respective  persons  of  the  Trinity,  by  adopting  a  contrary 
opinion,  have  assigned  to  each  a  separate,  equal,  and  inde- 
pendent existence,  making  their  union  in  one  Supreme  God- 
head consist,  not  in  any  natuml  and  neceasaiy  participation 

31 


242 

of  the  same  essence,  but  in  a  perfect  concurrence  of  wiily 
and  co-operation  of  action  in  all  their  designs. — The  Arians, 
on  the  other  hand,  borrowing  their  title  from  the  celebrated 
presbyter  of  Alexandria,  maintain  that  Christ  is  not  proper- 
ly God,  but  only  the  first  and  highest  of  all  creatures,  who 
has  been  taken  into  the  most  intimate  union  with  the  Deity, 
that  he  might  thereby  become  the  Saviour  of  the  world  ; 
conjoining  the  merit  arising  from  the  grandeur  of  this  divine 
relation,  with  that  of  the  obedient  and  suffering  condition  of 
human  nature  in  him.  Out  of  these,  another  class  has  arisen^ 
who  most  nearly  approach  the  orthodox  principle,  making 
Christ,  not  properly  a  creature,  nor  in  the  high  and  indepen- 
dent sense  of  the  Father,  God.  The  most  noted  of  the  mo- 
dern Arians  appear  to  have  adopted  the  ideas  of  the  celebra- 
ted Samuel  Clark,  who  stands  among  the  first  metaphysicians 
of  any  age,  that  the  Filial  is  an  eternal,  and  necessary  ema- 
nation from  the  Paternal  Deity ;  which  may  be  illustrated, 
if  such  an  infinite  subject  be  capable  of  any  illustration  from 
created  nature,  by  the  procession  of  light  from  the  body  of 
the  sun,  coexistent,  and  of  the  same  essence  with  the  body 
from  which  it  proceeds ;  yety  being  derived,  though  a  ne- 
cessary effect  from  a  necessary  cause,  it  is  to  be  regarded 
as  dependent.  Such  does  this  great  man  suppose  to  be  the 
dependence  of  the  Son  upon  the  Father. — Opposed  to  all 
these  forms  of  Trinitarian  existence  are  the  Pelagians  or  Soci- 
nians,  who,  notwithstanding  their  rejection  of  the  fundamen- 
tal principle  of  the  atonement,  and  its  related  doctrines,  still 


243 

elaim  the  title  of  christians,  because  they  enibraced  the  raor 
ral  code  of  Jesus  Christ.  Their  distinguishing  tenet  is,  (hat 
Christ  is  simply  a  man,  and  in  no  other  way  connected  with 
the  vSupreme  Deity,  than  as  being  inspired  by  him,  and  sent 
by  him  into  the  world  to  be  the  chief  of  the  prophets  and  ii> 
atructors  of  mankind. — This  sect  is  hardly  entitled  to  the 
honour  of  the  name  which  they  assume. 

On  this  great  and  essential  doctrine  of  Christianity,  the 
opinions  which  have  now  been  briefly  stated  are  the  chief 
which  deserve  to  be  mentioned,  exclusive  of  that  which  only 
we  conceive  to  be  warranted  by  a  just  interpretalion  of  the 
holy  scriptures.  This  presents  to  the  mind  the  Falher,  the 
Son,  and  (he  Holy  Spirit,  as  being  equal  in  power  and  glory  ; 
— equally  necessary  and  independent  in  (heir  existence  ; — 
perfectly  one  in  their  essence,  but  different  in  personality  ; — 
The  objects  of  equal,  and  undivided  worship.  In  the  econ- 
omy of  human  redemption,  however,  the  Paternal  Deity,  is  to 
be  considered  as  actually  exercising  the  rights  of  divine  au- 
thority.— The  Filial  Deity  as  being  the  immediate  minister 
of  the  divine  mercy  by  his  atonement  aill  in'crcession  ; — and 
the  Holy  Spirit  as  applying  the  revelation  of  the  divine  mercy 
for  the  sanctification  of  the  heart,  and  qualifying  the  disciples 
of  the  faith,  by  his  gracious  influence  for  the  possession  and 
enjoyment  of  eternal  life.  In  all  acts  of  worship  it  is  the 
principle  of  Christianity,  that  we  address  the  Father,  through 
the  Son,  by  the  agency  of  the  Holy  Spirit. 


244 


PROOF  OF  THE  TRINITY. 


Having  stated,  as  concisely  and  distinctly  as  possible, 
the  christian  principle  upon  this  subject,  I  proceed  to  estab- 
lish the  evidence  of  the  doctrine  solely  frona  the  sacred  scrip- 
tures. And,  being,  by  every  party,  acknowledged  to  be  a 
doctrine  purely  of  revelation,  I  reject  every  modification  of 
human  reason  on  a  subject  on  which  reason  is  utterly  incom- 
petent to  judge,  and  could,  therefore,  only  mislead.  1  equal- 
ly reject  from  this  demonstration,  every  part  of  the  sacred 
text  on  which  any  doubt  can  be  raised  of  the  genuineness  of 
the  copy,  the  scriptures  being  full  and  abundant  on  the  sub- 
ject, after  every  deduction  that  the  most  scrupulous  enemy 
can  require.  And  this  concession  is  made,  not  from  any 
hesitancy  which  can  justly  be  enteriained  concerning  the  au- 
thenticity of  those  few  disputed  passages,  which  have  been 
selected  for  objection,  out  of  our  commonly  acknowledged 
version,  but  that,  in  an  elementary  treatise  intended  for  the 
youngest  divines  and  for  the  comfort,  instruction,  and  estab- 
lishment of  the  common  Ci  ristian,  no  proof  may  be  presented 
to  them  but  what  shall  be  seen  to  rest  only  on  the  most  se- 
cure foundation.  And  no  discussions  introduced  concerning 
the  subject,  the  result  merely  of  human  reason,  but  the  naked 
language  of  scripture. 


245  I 

These  proofs  may  be  arrans^ed  into  such  as  are  general, 
relating  equally  to  the  whole  Godhead,  and  such  as  are  par- 
ticular, establishing  Ihe  Deity  of  each  person.  The  former 
are  presented  to  us  in  the  forms  of  baptism,  and  of  benedic- 
tion, both  which  are  administered  in  the  name  of  the  Father, 
the  Son,  and  the  Holy  Ghost,  and  shew  us  that  the  object  of 
worship",  and  of  trust  to  the  whole  church,  can  be  perfectly 
exhibited  to  our  faith,  only  under  these  three  united  titles. 
And  they  are  so  united  that  equal  power,  honour,  blessing, 
and  homage  is  ascribed  to  each.  To  that  divine  Trinity 
equally  we  are  consecrated  on  our  entrance  into  the  church  ; 
from  that  Trinity  equally  all  the  blessings  of  the  gospel  de- 
scend  to  the  faithful. 

In  examining  the  divinity  of  the  respective  persons  of  the 
Godhead,  it  is  requisite  chiefly  to  attend  to  those  proofs  which 
establish  the  proper  Deity  of  the  Son ;  for,  when  this  point 
is  once  admitted  there  is  no  further  objection  to  the  full  ac- 
knowledgment of  the  doctrine.  The  declaration  usually 
quoted  from  St.  Paul  in  the  second  chapter  of  the  epistle  to 
the  Philippians^  I  omit,  for  the  reasons  already  assigned, 
and  rely,  at  present,  on  two  positive  and  explicit  attestations 
contained  in  the  first  chapter  of  the  gospel  of  the  apostle 
John,  and  the  fifth  chapter  of  his  first  epistle. — "  In  the  be- 
Slinning  was  the  Word,  and  the  Word  was  with  God,  and  the 

Phil.  il.  6. 


246 

Word  was  God. — And  we  know  that  the  Son  of  God  is  come, 
and  hath  given  U9  an  understanding,  that  we  may  know  him 
that  is  true,  and  we  are  in  him  that  is  true,  in  his  Son  Jesus 
Christ, — this  is  the  true  God,  and  eternal  life."  If  it  had 
been  the  purpose  of  our  Hearenly  Father  to  teach  this  doc- 
trine to  the  world  so  that  no  mistake  or  error  could  be  com- 
mitted with  respect  to  it,  we  cannot  easily  conceive  how  it 
coiild  be  taught  in  stronger  and  more  explicit  lang!iage.  Con- 
1  inced  of  this,  as  one  would  think  that  every  man  of  candour 
and  fairness  must  be,  we  see  those  who  deny  the  principle 
obliged  io  take  refuge  in  the  utmost  ingenuity,  and  even  so- 
phistry of  crilicism,  to  elude  the  force  of  the  evidence  which 
arises  from  the  obvious  construction  of  the  sacred  writings. 
If  these  terms  are  explained  to  a  different  and  more  circuitous 
meaning,  all  certainty  is  taken  from  the  scriptures,  and  human 
ingenuity  may  equally  bend  them  to  the  support  of  the  most 
opposite  opinions. 

This  argument  ib,  m  no  small  degree,  confirmed  by  the 
frequent  and  pointed  references  made  by  the  apostles  to  the 
prophetic  and  mosaic  writings,  in  which  Christ  is  spoken  of  as 
the  Angelof  the  covenant,  and  addressed  as  Jehovah,  that  glo- 
rious being  to  whom  the  highest  characters  of  divinity  belong, 
and  for  whom  the  profoundest  worship  of  mankind  is  claim- 
ed. By  comparing  the  New  Testament  with  the  Old,  it  be- 
Gomes  evident  that  the  Son  was  God,  adored  by  the  patri- 
archs, and  is  the  Author  and  Subject  of  all  those  divine  ap« 


247 

pearances  exhibltetl  to  these  eniinent  Sainta  recorded  in  the 
ancient  scriptures.  It  strengthens  the  proof  already  pro- 
duced of  this  doctrine  being  always  acknowledged  by  the  He- 
brew nation,  and  the  primitive  church,  from  the  beginning  ol" 
the  worhj.  It  renders  probable  likewise  the  opinion  of  those 
great  men,  equally  conspicuous  for  learning  and  piety,  who 
believe  that  this  world  was  created  principally  to  illustrate  the 
glory  of  God  in  the  redemption  of  man ;  and  that  it  was,  for 
that  pKfpose,  from  the  beginning,  put  under  the  immediate 
dominion  and  administration  of  the  Son  of  God.  These 
ideas  must  forcibly  impress  the  pious  inquirer  who  candidly 
studies  the  sacred  writings,  and  compares  the  christian  ers 
with  the  most  ancient  periods  of  the  mosaic  economy.  The 
declaration  of  the  apostle  in  the  seventh  chapter  of  the  Acts; 
"  This  is  he  who  was  in  the  church  in  the  wilderness,  with 
the  angel  who  spoke  to  him  in  the  mount  Sina,  and  with  our 
fathers,"  most  evidently  refers  to  the  history  of  the  Exodus 
in  the  third  chapter.  "  And  the  Angel  ofthe  Lord  appeared 
to  him  in  a  flame  of  fire  out  of  the  midst  of  a  bush,  and  he 
looked,  and  behold  the  bush  burned  with  fire  ;  and  the  bush 
was  not  consumed.  And  Moses  said,  I  will  now  turn  aside 
and  see  this  great  sight,  why  the  bush  is  not  burnt.  And 
when  the  Lord  saw  that  he  turned  aside  to  see,  God 
called  to  him  out  of  the  midst  of  the  bush,  and  said  Moaes, 
Moses.  And  he  said,  here  am  I.  And  be  said,  draw  not 
nijih  hitherto :  put  off  thy  shoes  from  off  thy  feei ;  for  the  place 
whereon  thou  standest  is  holy  ground.     Mweover,  he  said  I 


248 

am  the  God  of  ihy  father,  ihe  God  of  Abraham,  the  God  of 
Isaac  and  the  God  of  Jacob."  Behold  then,  Jesus  Christ 
presiding  as  Jehovah  in  the  ancient  church,  and  acknowl- 
edged to  be  the  God  of  Abraham,  Isaac,  and  Jacob. — Many 
passages  contribute  to  shew  that  Christ  was  the  supreme 
Ruler  and  Guide  of  Israel  in  their  progress  through  the  wilder- 
ness to  the  land  of  promise.  And  for  the  perfect  Deity  of 
Jesus  Christ  acknowledged  in  both  branches  of  the  church, 
a  proof  more  precise  and  strong  can  hardly  be  adduced,  than 
that  of  the  apostle  in  the  beginning  of  his  epistle  to  the  He- 
brews, quoting  the  forty  fifth  Psalm,  where  the  prophet  un- 
der the  full  spirit  of  inspiration,  saith  of  the  Son,  thy  throne 
O  God  is  forever  and  ever,  a  sceptre  of  righteousness  is  the 
sceptre  of  thy  kingdom.  And  the  evangelist  John,  in  the 
twelfth  chapter  of  his  gospel,  applies  to  Christ  one  of  the  most 
sublime  descriptions  of  Jehovah  recorded  in  the  sacred  writ- 
ings ;  "  In  the  year,  that  king  Uzziah  died,  I  saw  also  the  Lord 
sitting  on  a  throne,  high  and  lifted  up,  above  it  stood  the  Ser- 
aphim ;  each  one  had  six  wings  ;  with  twain  he  covered  his 
feet,  with  twain  he  covered  his  face,  and  with  twain  he  did 
fly  ;  and  one  cried  to  another  and  said  ;  holy,  holy,  holy,  is 
the  Lord  of  hosts ;  the  whole  earth  is  full  of  his  glory,"  Is.  vi. 
1.  These  things,  adds  the  evangelist,  said  Esaias,  when 
he  saw  his  glory,  that  is,  the  glory  of  Christ,  of  whom  he 
was  at  that  time  writing,  and  spake  of  him. 


249 

Another  proof,  perhaps  not  less  forcible,  of  the  Deity  of 
the  Son,  is  (he  frequent  ascription  to  him  of  all  ihe  peculiar 
and  incommunicable  attribute;^  of  the  Godhead  ;  eternity,  irri- 
miitability,  omniscience,  omnipresence,  and  creation.—'*  And 
thou  Befhlehem  Ephralah  (hough  thou  be  liKle  among  (he 
thousands  of  Judah,  jet,  out  of  thee  shall  he  come  forth  un- 
to  me  that  is  to  be  ruler  in  Israel  ;  whose  goings  forth  have 
been  of  old,  from  everlasting;"  saith  the  very  explicit  pre- 
diction of  the  prophet  Micah.  Jesus  himself  declares,— 
"  before  Abraham  was,  1  am."  And  by  his  Spirit  he  an- 
nounces to  his  favourite  disciple  John,-—**  I  am  Alpha  and 
Omega,  the  beginning  and  the  ending,  which  is,  whi».b  wag, 
and  which  is  to  come,  the  Alaiighfy."  Listen  to  the  strong 
and  unequivocal  language  of  the  epistle  to  the  Hebrews.— 
"  To  the  Son  he  saith,  thou  Lord  in  the  '  eginning  hast  laid 
the  foundation  of  the  earth,  and  (he  heavens  are  the  work  of 
thy  hands  ;  they  shall  perish,  but  thou  remainest  ;  they  shall 
wax  old  as  doth  a  garment  ;  but  thou  art  the  same,  and  thy 
years  shall  not  fail."  The  s^rae  author  in  the  following  sen- 
tence unites,  in  the  most  positive  terms,  the  eternity  and  im- 
mutability of  the  Saviour,  *'  Jesus  Christ  the  same  yester- 
day, to  day,  and  forever."  And  he  himself  testifies  his  owa 
omnipreserice — **  where  two  or  three  are  gathered  together 
in  my  name,  there  am  I  in  the  midst  of  them,  IVlat.  1 8.  And 
io  !  I  am  with  you  always  to  the  en»l  of  Ihe  world,"  iMat.  28. 
1  add,  in  the  last  place,  that  all  divine  altribnresare  embraced 
in  the  work  of  creation,  wbich  is  explicitly  ascribed  to  the 


250 

Son  :  "  for  by  him,  all  things  were  created,  that  are  in  hear- 
en,  and  that  are  in  earth,  visible  and  invisible,  whether  they 
be  thrones,  or  dominions  or  principalities,  or  powers:  all 
things  were  created  by  him  and  for  him,  and  be  is  before  all 
things;  and  by  him  all  things  consist:"  Col.  1.  16.  Crea' 
tion  forms  the  supreme  relation  between  the  Creator  and  the 
creature.  It  is  the  true  foundation  of  worship,  and  consti^ 
tutes  exclusively  that  perfect  right  claimed  by  the  Eternal 
to  our  duty  and  obedience.  All  things  were  made  by  him, 
saith  the  evangelist  John  :  and  therefore  the  Father  hath 
committed  all  judsment^  that  is,  the  entire  government  of 
this  world,  to  the  Son,  that  all  men  should  honour  the  Son 
even  as  they  lionour  the  Father. 

These  proofs,  although  consisting  of  a  very  small  number 
selected  out  of  the  great  mass  of  the  scriptures  proportioned 
to  the  brevity  which  I  contemplate,  afford  ample  confirma- 
tion of  the  true  and  proper  Deity  of  the  Son  ;  and,  in  that, 
they  establish  beyond  reasonable  doubt  the  doctrine  of  the 
Trinity.  No  small  degree  of  strength  arises  to  the  argument 
from  the  constrained  reasonings  by  which  its  enemies  study 
to  combat  the  force  of  this  evidence.  Some  of  the  highest 
titles  of  divinity,  it  is  alleged,  are  not  bestowed  on  the  Son, 
which  are  ascribed  to  the  Father,  such  as  the  Almighty,  the 
Most-High.  Can  any  objection  more  obviously  demonstrate 
the  weakness  of  the  cause  which  is  obliged  to  have  recourse 
tb  such  evasion!,  when  other  titles,  equally  characteristic  cf 


251 

the  divine  nature,  are,  wllh  greater  frequency,  applietl  to 
hini  ?  Be'sides,  a  part  of  those  titles  which  are  supposed  to 
be  exclusively  appropriated  to  the  Almighty  Father,  arc, 
niosl  obviously,  used,  not  as  marking  any  superiority  of  na- 
ture, but,  along  with  others,  as  distinctive  characters  of  the 
different  persons  of  the  Trinity.  To  give  only  one  exam- 
ple ;  There  is  one  God  the  Fathevy  of  rvlium  are  all  things, 
and  one  Lord  Jesus  Christ  by  whom  arc  all  thin<rs. 
Will  it  not  require  some  peculiar  deplli  of  understanding  to 
assign  the  superiority  oi  of  to  bi/,  and  in  the  act  of  creation, 
to  say  which  is  expressive  of  the  greater  power,  or  the  great- 
er dignity  ? 

The  objectors  presume,  that  the  terms  expressive  of  the 
highest  powers  of  divinity  are  applied  to  Christ,  as  belong- 
ing to  him  only  in  an  inferior  degree.  And  presuming  io- 
deed  it  is,  to  attempt  to  graduate  the  divine  perfections,  or 
his  creative  operations,  by  our  limited  standard.  What 
measure  have  the  scriptures  given  us  to  fix  the  import  of 
these  phrases  except  the  olnious  meaning  and  connexion  of 
the  terms?  What  gradations  can  be  fixed  in  the  powers  of 
creation,  omnipotence,  and  omnipresence  ?  Such  objections 
never  could  be  suggested  but  by  a  fallacious  reason  which 
presumes  to  measure  the  divine  nature  by  its  own  narrow 
views;  and  under  the  powerful  influence  of  a  prejudice 
which,  having  fixed  its  philosophico  theological  system  inde- 
pendently of  that  sacred  regard  to  the  simple  dictates  of  the 


252 

word  of  God  which  ought  lo  govern  the  ideas  of  every  chris-^ 
tiai),  studies  (o  bend  the  rule  of  faith  to  its  preconceived 
opinions. 

The  force  of  the  argument  derived  from  the  powers  of 
creation  ascribed  to  Christ  these  writers  think  to  weaken  by 
changing  in  some  instances  the  import  of  the  word  translated 
worlds.  By  whom  also,  saith  the  apostle  to  the  Hebrews, 
he  made  the  worlds  ;  which  phraseology  they  render  ;  by 
whom  also  he  constituted  the  ages  ;  meaning  the  different 
dispensations  of  the  church,  the  patriarchal,  the  mosaic,  and 
the  christian.  Litlle  advantage,  however,  can  be  gained  to 
their  cause  by  this  change,  when  the  full  import  of  the  terms 
is  fairly  considered.  Less  they  cannot  imply,  if  we  give 
them  any  meaning  worthy  the  solemnity  of  the  divine  ora- 
cles, than  that  the  whole  moral  order  of  the  universe  has  been 
originally  constitued,  and,  at  all  times,  arranged  and  govern- 
ed exclusively  by  the  providence  of  the  Son. — But  is  this 
less  the  property  of  divine  power,  or  less  the  work  of  divine 
wisdom  than  is  the  physical  constitution  and  order  of  the 
universe  ? — The  most  ingenious  evasions,  therefore,  or 
colourings  of  the  strong  language  of  scripture,  leave  en- 
tire the  evidence  of  the  full  and  perfect  Godhead  of  the 
Son. 

The  particular  proofs  of  the  Deity  of  the  Holy  Spirit  in 
the  next  place,  demand  our  attention ;  in  which  it  is  necesss- 


253 

iy,  first,  to  egtabllsb  bis  dislinct  personalify,  and  tbat  he  ii 
not  spoken  of  merely  as  a  quality,  expressive  of  the  holiness 
of  the  divine  nature.  Tlie  import  of  the  word  spirit  is  un- 
derstood as  far  as  the  term  can  be  explained,  only  by  the  ac- 
tion of  our  own  minds.  What  is  most  obscure  and  difficult 
in  our  conceptions,  when  tre  attempt  to  apply  it  to  the  Eter- 
nal Spirit,  arises  from  the  infinity  of  the  subject.  Here  we 
must  rest  contented  and  submissive  from  the  consciousness 
of  our  onn  imperfection.  But  that  the  Holy  Ghost  is  spoken 
of  as  a  distinct  person,  no  less  than  the  Father  and  the  Son, 
is  evident  from  the  forms  of  benediction  and  of  baptism,  as 
well  as  from  other  passages  in  which  the  expression  adnaits  of 
no  ambiguity. — "  i  will  pray  the  Father,  and  he  shall  give 
you  another  comforter,  that  may  abide  with  you  forever ; 
even  the  Spirit  of  truth,'*  John  xiv.  16,  \7,  "  When  he  the 
Spirit  of  truth  is  come,  he  shall  guide  you  into  all  truth," 
John  xvi.  13.  "  There  are  diversities  of  gifts,  but  the  same 
Spirit,"  1  Cor.  12. 

When  the  personality  of  the  Holy  Spirit  is  established, 
little  is  requisite  for  the  proof  of  his  Deity.  The  evidence 
of  the  one  is  involved  in  that  of  the  other.  We  see,  in  the 
holy  scriptures,  the  same  divine  attributes  ascribed  to  him  as 
to  the  other  persons  of  the  ever  blessed  Trinity.  We  have, 
indeed,  no  further  controversy  on  this  important  doctrine. 


254 
No  queslion  now  remains,  which  merila,  in  any  tlegree; 
the  attention  of  the  student  of  theology,  except  that  which, 
for  a  long  time,  imprudently  agitated  the  eastern  and  the 
western  christians,  concerning  the  procession  of  the  Son  and 
Holy  Spirit,  and  that  chiefly  as  a  subject  of  history.  A 
question  on  this  high  and  inscrutable  doctrine  it  is  which  is 
impossible  to  be  clearly  and  intelligibly  decided  ;  nor  do  we 
perceive  any  important  moral  consequence  that  could  result 
from  the  decision.  The  Greek  church  maintained  that  both 
(he  Son  and  the  Holy  Ghost  proceed  from  the  Father  only. 
The  Latin  church  contended  that  the  Son  proceeds  from 
(he  Father,  but  the  Holy  Spirit  equally  from  the  Father  and 
the  Son. — On  a  controversy  of  this  nature  we  ought  to  speak 
with  extreme  reservCj  and  to  assert  with  posiliveness  nothing 
but  what  is  clearly  warranted  by  the  scriptures  them- 
selves ;  permitting  no  modification  of  the  language  or  ideas 
to  our  own  fancy.  When  we  listed  solely  to  the  sacred  writ- 
ers, the  evangelist  John  declares  that  the  Spirit  proceedeih 
from  the  Father  f^  but  he  is  also  called  by  the  apostle  Paul, 
writing  to  the  Romans  and  other  churches,  the  Spirit  of  the 
Son.f  When  we  would  conceive  or  explain  this  doctrine 
farther  than  the  strict  terms  of  revelation  import,  the  mind 
is  immediately  lost  in  an  attempt  entirely  beyond  the  powers 
of  the  human  intellect.     And  although  the  terms  of  scrip- 

^  JchR  XV.  26.        f  Romaas  viii.  9.     Sal.  xir.  8.    Phil.  5.  19 


253 

ture,  and  the  opinion  of  the  highest  christian  antiquity  ap- 
pear to  favour  the  doctrine  of  the  Roman  church,  yet  the 
violence  of  the  disputes  which  appear,  in  the  progress  of  thia 
controversy,  between  them  and  their  Grecian  brethren  is  a 
i^eep  reproach  t*>  b^th  parties. 


OF    THE 


DECREES  OF  GOD, 


Having  treated  of  the  being  of  God,  and  of  that  idea  of 
the  divine  nature  and  perfectioa  presented  to  us  in  Holy 
Scripture,  the  subject  which  next  occurs  to  our  considera- 
tion is  his  immediate  agency  and  control  over  all  the  works 
of  his  hand,  usually  styled,  in  our  theological  systems,  his 
Decrees*  By  this  term  is  intended  the  sovereign  and  holy 
will  of  Gdd  concerning  all  things  that  exist,  not  only  in  their 
being,  but  in  all  their  changes  and  acti'  ns  from  the  greatest 
to  the  most  minute.  They  embrace  the  entire  system  of  the 
universe,  both  physical,  and  moral,  corporeal  and  spiritual, 
and,  in  the  language  of  philosophy,  constitute  the  universal 
laws  both  of  matter  and  of  mind  ;  which  are  so  ordained,  in, 
their  original  structure,  as,  by  their  natural  operation,  to  at- 
tain every  purpose  of  the  all-wise  Creator.  But  divines  with 
justice,  perhaps,  entertaining  a  suspicion  of  the  language  of 
philosophy,  as  if  it  kept  the  immediate  agency  of  God  too 
much  out  of  view,  by  interposing  the  natural  law  between 
him  and  the  event,  and  willing  to  present  him  always  to  the 
mind,  in  all  the  changes  of  the  universe,  have  chosen  to  em- 
ploy the  terms  ordination,  and  predestination  as  exhibiting 

33 


2UB 

the  ultimate  cause  of  whatever  takes  place  in  heaven  or  ou 
earth.  No  event  can  happen  but  in  consequence  of  the  laws 
which  he  has  established,  and  estabhshed  with  a  full,  imme- 
diate and  present  view  of  every  result  which  should  spring 
from  them.  And  as  the  whole  creation  was,  at  all  times,  pre- 
sent before  him,  from  the  beginning,  and  nothing,  strictly 
speaking,  can  be  considered  as  either  past,  or  to  come  in  the 
view  of  omniscience,  his  preordination  or  decree  is  justly  re- 
regarded  as  embracing  every  event,  and  all  events  are  seen 
as  being  immediately  obvious  to  his  view,  and  arising  natural- 
ly out  of  the  train  of  causes  which  he  has  ordained. 

This  term,  as  it  has  been  adopted  by  theologians,  h 
merely  technical,  and  has  an  appropriate  meaning,  being 
used  to  signify  the  divine  purposes  with  respect  to  the  whole 
order  of  nature,  but  chiefly  with  respect  to  the  moral  states 
and  destinies  of  mankind.  It  is  evidently  borrowed  from  an 
analogy  supposed  to  exist  between  the  divine  and  human 
governments,  and  is  consequently  employed  to  express  the 
will  of  Almighty  God  as  the  supreme  legislator  and  gover» 
nor  of  the  universe. 

Few  words,  in  the  Old  Testament,  hfive  been  translated 
by  this  term,  and  m  every  place  where  they  are  employed 
they  might,  with  equal  propriety,  have  been  rendered  by 
the  terms  statute,  law,*  or  purpose.  In  the  version  of  the 
New  Testament  it  is  no  where  found,  although  {he  equiva- 


259 

lent  terms  coiinselt  purpose,  foreknowledge,  predtstinatiortf 
frequently  occur;  which  language,  especially  when  it  relate! 
to  (he  moral  states,  and  conditions  of  men,  evidently  imply  all 
that  is  intended  by  decree,  as  it  has  been  introduced  hilo  the 
systems  of  theology. 

To  many,  who  appear  not  to  have  justly  reflected  on  the 
subject,  this  term  carries  in  it  somewhat  gloomy  and  austere, 
as  implying  that  all  the  actions,  and  the  final  states  of  man- 
kind have  been  fixed  by  an  arbitrary  will,  and  that  theif 
whole  moral  government  turns  on  principles  of  necessityj 
equally  with  (hose  which  govern  the  material  world.  But 
when  we  identify  his  decrees  with  the  laivs  of  universal  be- 
ing, producing  their  effects,  with  certainty,  indeed,  but  free- 
ly or  necessarily,  according  to  the  nature  of  each  subject,  this 
apparent  harshness  ceases  to  exist.  No  reasonable  doubt  can 
be  entertained  by  any  reflecting  man,  but  that  all  things,  from 
the  beginning  have  been  determined  by  the  Creator  in  a  cer- 
tain order,  which  order  must  arise  out  of  the  laws  of  their  re- 
spective natures,  and  the  combinations  of  each  subject  with 
all  other  things.  And  these  all  having  been  framed  by  their 
glorious  Author  with  the  most  perfect  foresight,  their  infinitelj- 
various  results  must  have  been  present  from  the  beginning,  to 
his  all  comprehensive  view.  On  the  most  obvious  principles 
of  reason,  therefore,  the  divine  foreknowledge  of  events,  must 
have  been  founded  on  the  divine  will  in  framing  the  universal 
structure  of  things,  and  impressing  upon  them  respectively 


260 

the  laws  of  their  action.  The  results  being,  in  consequence, 
peiiei  ly  foreknown,  the  whole  must  have  been  conceived  in 
one  consecutive  and  consistent  plan  according  to  the  designs 
of  his  infinite  wisdom  ;  physical  events  arising  out  of  the  ne- 
cessary laws  of  matter  and  motion,  and  moral  consequences 
springing  from  the  free  laws  of  motive  and  volition. 

These  consequences  so  clearly  deduced  from  the  princi- 
ples of  reason,  are  conformable  to  the  whole  strain  of  the  sa- 
cred writings,  in  which  is  asserted,  in    the  most  explicit  and 
unequivocal  terms,    the   universal   preordination  of  events, 
however  minutely  they  descend  to  the  most  trivial  circum- 
stan«  es,  or  however  strongly  they  imply  the  merit,  or  the 
guih  of  individual  acts.     Let  me  appeal  to  a  single  exam- 
ple which  may  be   in  the  room  of  niany.     Him,  saith  the 
apostle   speaking  of  Christ,  being  delivered  by  the  deter^ 
minate  counsel^  and  forekn>  rvledire  of  God^  ye  have  taken, 
and  by  wicked  hands,  have  crucified  and  slain.     \\  hen  we 
assign  (o  this  declaration  of  the  sacred  writer  its  full  extent  ; 
couhl  the  delerfiiination  of  this  great  event  take  place,  with- 
out  iiivohinu;  in  it  the  pie  etermination  of  all  the  acts  by 
Tvhich  it  was  gradually,  prepared,  and  finally  accomplished  ? 
Yet,  'vas  no!  every  purpose  so  connected  with  the  nature  of 
man,  and  the  freedoai  of  human  action,  that,  in  this  impious 
deed,  though  predelerfuined,  the  agents  were  justly  subject 
to  the  lijihteoijs  condemnation  of  Hea\en.     But  it  were  un- 
necessary, I  presume,  lo  refer  you  singly  to  the  muUiplied 


261 

evidences  of  this  truth  which  speak  in  every  pa8;e  of  the  holy 
scriptures.  Of  those  who  sincerely  lo\e  God  the  uposlle 
speaks  as  bein^  "called  according  to  his  purpose  ;  for  whom 
he  did  foreknow  he  also  did  predestinate  to  be  confornaed  to 
the  image  of  his  Son."  And  the  whole  of  this  ninth  chap- 
ter of  his  epistle  to  the  Romans  appears  to  have  been  writ- 
ten with  the  most  palpable  intention  to  remove  all  ambiguity 
from  this  subject.  Suffer  me  to  quote  only  the  eleventh 
verse :  "  The  children,  being  not  yet  born,  neither  having 
done  any  good,  or  evil,  that  the  purpose  of  God,  according 
to  election,  might  stand,  not  of  works,  but  of  him  that  call- 
eth,  it  was  said,  the  greater  shall  serve  the  younger ;  as  it  is 
written,  Jacob  have  I  loved,  but  Esau  have  I  hated." 

Can  words  proclaim,  with  more  decisive  evidence,  the 
preordination  of  events,  and  of  those  events  particularly,  I 
mean  the  moral  states  of  mankind,  which  have  given  rise  to 
the  most  formidable  objections  to  the  truth  on  this  interesting 
question.  Attend  to  the  pointed  language  of  the  sacred  wri' 
ter—- the  election  of  one  to  honour  is  not  made  of  any  antece- 
dent view  of  his  cood  works  ;  for  il  is  not  of  workSy  but  of 
him  that  calleth,  founded  only  on  reasons  in  his  own  infinite 
and  inscrutable  wisdom.  Not  that  any  one  is  chosen  with- 
out, or  wholly  independent  of  his  good  works,  but  his  works 
are  themselves  the  object  of  the  decree,  and  are  embraced 
in  ilie  same  act  with  the  election  of  the  believer;  and  this 
without  the  smallest  infringement  on  the  perfect  freedom  of 


262 

iiie  individual  agent.  For  as  has  before  been  observed,  the 
laws  of  the  moral  world  have  been  so  framed  as,  by  their  na- 
tural and  free  developmenf,  to  attain  all  the  purposes  of  the 
divine  wisdom,  in  full  consistency  with  human  liberty,  with 
as  great  certainly  as  can  arise  from  the  laws  of  the  physical 
creation. 

It  is  in  vain  to  attempt  to  evade  the  force  of  this  conclusion 
by  the  hypothesis,  that  the  election  or  reprobation  of  Jacob 
or  of  Esau,  regarded  only  the  national  interests  and  preroga- 
tives of  the  people  respectively  descended  from  these  patri- 
archs. For  in  the  election  of  a  nation  to  temporal  or  to  spi- 
ritual privileges,  are  there  not  innumerable  moral  results  inti- 
mately involved  in  the^act?  In  the  preference  given  to  Ja- 
cob, was  it  not  the  election  of  the  whole  ancient  church  to 
mercies,  privileges,  graces,  resting  only  in  the  gift  of  Hea- 
ven, with  all  the  sanctifying  consequences  growing  out  of 
them  to  great  numbers  in  that  chosen  nation  ? 

If  then  the  preordination  of  events  is  established  by  the 
clearest  decisions  of  the  holy  scriptures,  as  it  has  already 
been  shown  to  be,  by  the  plainest  conclusions  of  reason,  and 
in  that  point  which  has  been  thought  to  form  the  principal  ob- 
jection against  the  doctrine,  we  see,  in  this  conseqiience,  one 
of  the  strongest  arguments  for  the  universality  of  the  divine 
decrees. 


263 

The  conclusion,  Iicwever,  has  been  opposed  by  some  spe- 
cious reasonings,  an  explicit  answer  to  which  will  serve  to 
add  strength  to  the  general  argument.  They  arise  chiefly 
from  moral  considerations.  For  the  government  of  the  na- 
tural world  is  resigned  by  these  writers,  without  controver- 
sy, to  the  dominion  of  fixed,  necessary,  and  immutable  laws. 
The  doctrine  of  preordination,  they  affirm,  stands  in  direct 
contradiction  (o  the  moral  liberty  of  man ;  and  to  the  essen- 
tia! benignity  of  the  divine  nature. — Of  each  let  ns  take  3 
very  brief  review. 

The  former  inference  evidently  springs  out  of  those  false 
metaphysics  which  confound  the  voluntary  and  moral  action 
of  the  mind,  with  the  physical  and  mechanical  laws  of  body. 
A  confusion  which  has  been  greatly  promoted  by  the  com- 
mon error  of  recurring,  in  all  our  reasonings  concerning  the 
one,  to  analogies  and  illustrations  borrowed  from  the  other; 
as  if  the  suasion  of  motive  bore  a  perfect  analogy  to  the  im.» 
pulsive  force  of  matter,  which  is  always  followed  by  a  ne- 
cessary effect,  that  can  be  calculated  with  mathematical  pre- 
cision, when  the  acting  force  is  known,  and  the  direction 
given  in  which  it  is  impressed.  For  the  influence  of  motive, 
on  the  other  hand,  no  sure  and  general  measure  can  be  form- 
ed, its  power  of  excitement  depending  on  the  nature  of  the 
motive  as  relative  to  the  character  and  temperament  of  the 
individual,  varied  as  it  may  be  by  education,  custom,  the 
influence  of  general  opinion,  and  innumerable  rirrumstanceR 


264 

which  arc  reducible  to  no  certain  rule.  Where  necessily 
acts  there  is  no  room  for  deliberation  and  choice  ;  but  where 
the  influence  of  suasion  only  operates,  addressed  to  the  mo- 
ral principles  of  our  nature,  we  are  conscious  of  a  power  with- 
in ourselves  of  voluntarily  comparing  and  balancing  motives, 
and,  according  to  our  pleasure,  yielding  to  one  or  another. 

If  we  attend  to  the  operations  of  our  own  minds,  uninflu- 
enced by  any  theory,  we  perceive  a  total  difference  in  their 
nature  and  action  respectively,  between  matter  and  mind. 
In  the  moral  actions  of  the  latter,  especially,  except  when 
under  the  control  of  some  pernicibus  habit,  wbith  has  be- 
come inveterately  fixed,  we  are  conscious  of  perfect  liberty. 
A  sensation  which  may  be  clearly  understood  by  every  per- 
son who  distinctly  reflects  upon  himself,  and  analyzes  the  ac- 
tions of  his  mind,  but  is  difficult  to  be  defined  on  account  of 
the  simplicity  of  the  ideas.  And  on  these  subjects,  let  it  be 
borne  in  mind,  our  own  sensations  form  the  only  proper  tests 
of  truth  and  nature. 

In  the  strongest  exciieraent  to  act,  for  example,  we  are 
sensible  of  the  power  of  resistance,  and  of  being  able,  at  any 
moment,  to  arrest  the  action,  though  not  always,  and  imme- 
diately of  a  power  to  act  in  a  contrary  direction ;  for  this 
may  depend  on  education,  and  the  moral  and  religious  culti- 
vation of  the  mind.  This  liberty  in  acting,  however,  such 
are  the  laws  of  the  spiritual  world,  is  perfectly  consistent 


with  the  most  absolute  certainty  in  the  event,  which,  indet;*], 
is  the  only  foundation  of  foreknowledge  in  God  himself. 
And  in  the  Divine  Mind,  foreknowledge  and  preordinaliott 
are  the  same  ;  for  it  rests  on  the  certain  laws  v.hich  he  has 
ordained  for  all  being,  in  both  the  great  departments  of  the 
universe.  Therefore,  are  they  often  promiscuously  used  in 
the  sacred  scriptures.  To  illustrate  these  reflections  by  au 
humble  example  drawn  from  our  own  experience  Even 
with  our  imperfect  knowledge  of  mankind,  and  of  the  usual 
relations  which  subsist  between  motive  and  conduct,  how  of- 
ten can  we  predict  with  assurance  the  tenor  of  a  man's  ac- 
tions, in  given  circumstances,  and  frame  upon  them  our  own 
plans,  without  any  hazard  of  mistake  ?  How  often  may  a  pa- 
rent who  has  long  observed  the  influence  of  his  Instructions 
upon  a  child,  predict,  with  the  utmost  assurance,  at  the  same 
time,  without  the  smallest  apprehension  of  the  existence  of 
any  necessary  influence  in  the  case,  the  act  of  his  son  in  any 
definite  situation  ?  If  the  human  intellect  can  proceed  with 
safety  thus  far,  cannot  the  all-creating  and  omniscient  Power, 
who  is  fully  possessed  of  the  characters,  temperamer.t,  incli- 
nations, habitudes,  and  the  ten  thousand  minute  views  and 
interests  which  go  to  influence  the  actions  of  individuals, 
foreknow,  and,  therefore,  if  he  please  ordain  and  decree  the 
part  which  each  shall  bear  in  the  most  complicated  moral 
system,  and  in  the  whole  drama  of  life,  t\'ithout  the  smallest 
infringement  on  the  liberty  of  the  mind  in  her  volilions  ? 


The  pbilosoplicrs  and  divines  of  the  necessarian  school, 
who  confound  moral  with  physical  action,  sec  infinite  diffi- 
culties in  reconciling  the  certain  influence  of  motive  with  the 
freedom  of  volition:  on  the  other  hand,  they  find  equal  dif- 
ficulty in  conceiving  the  certainty  of  events,  if,  at  the  same 
time,  those  events  are  to  depend  on  the  will  of  Jree  agents. 
Embarrassed  by  the  contending  difficulties,  they  have  de- 
termined, against  all  experience,  to  maintain  that  moral  causes 
act  with  the  same  kind  of  absolute  and  irresistible  necessi- 
ty as  physical.  Many  writers  have  erred  as  far  on  the  op- 
posite extreme  ;  and,  for  the  sake  of  preserving  the  liberti/ 
of  man,  have  thought  it  requisite  utterly  to  deny  the  certain- 
ty of  events,  depending,  in  any  degree,  on  the  purposes  of 
free  minds.  Freedom,  in  their  opinion,  implies  absolute 
contingency  in  its  effects.  Theologians,  as  well  as  philoso- 
phers of  this  class,  are  absurd  enough  (o  deny  prescience,  as 
well  as  preordination.  The  connexion  of  motive  with  cer- 
tainty, so  as,  on  the  one  hand,  to  exclude  necessity,  and,  on 
the  other,  contingency,  is  a  subject  of  feeling.  And,  to  a 
man  who  is  capable  of  observing  the  motions  of  his  own 
mind,  the  perceptions  which  this  feeling  affords  are  as  clear 
as  any  principles  of  science.  Science  rests  on  no  other 
foundation,  for  its  axioms,  than  internal  feeling  or  sensation  : 
which  are  therefore  justly  denominated  its  first  irntks. 

On  this  subject  we  distinctly  perceive  the  following  facts, 
that  motives,  according  to  the  infinite  diversities  of  human 


26r 

character,  possess  a  perceptible  iDiluence  on  action's—that  this 
influence,  in  most  instances  at  least,  is  not  irresistible ;  but 
that,  in  acting,  we  are  perfectly  free ;  and  this  sensation  is 
not  a  delusive  feeling,  but  carries  with  it  complete  conviction 
of  its  truth,  which  ought  never  to  be  overthrown  by  any 
hypothetical  speculation.  Yet  such  connexion  between  mo- 
tives and  actions  exists,  according  to  the  states  and  charac- 
ters of  men,  that,  where  these,  in  all  their  relations  and  cir- 
cumstances are  completely  known,  certainty  accompanies 
moral  as  well  as  natural  causes  and  effects.  By  the  Al- 
mighty and  Omniscient  Creator,  then,  all  the  thoughts  and 
purposes  of  mankind,  all  the  circumstances  and  motives 
which  can  in  any  way  influence  their  actions,  were,  from 
eternity  most  distinctly  known.  Yet  his  foreknowledge  does, 
in  no  way,  ne(;e3sitate  the  events  connected  with  it,  although 
it  proves  his  preordination  ;  that  is,  their  certain  existence, 
according  to,  and  resulting  from  the  order  of  nature,  whether 
physical  or  moral,  established  by  him. 

That  the  moral  liberty  of  man  and  the  preordination  of 
God,  do  not  militate  against  one  another,  is  susceptible  of 
demonstration  even  on  the  principles  of  those  who  most 
strenuously  oppose  our  doctrine.  Let  us  suppose,  for  the 
sake  of  the  argument,  the  present  state  of  human  nature  to  be 
a  state  of  moral  liberty,  as  perfect  as  the  greatest  enemies  of 
divine  preordination  can  imagine  ;  suppose  that  there  is  no 
preordination  in  the  system  of  the  universe,  but  that  all  things 


268 

bappen  wiliiont  any  purpose,  on  the  part  of  the  Creator, 
yet  inist  these  philosuphers  conless  that  they  take  place  hi  a 
cerlan  train  of  caui^es  and  effer's;  or  if,  with  Mi.  Hume, 
they  expunge  from  the  vocabulary  of  nature  the  name  of 
cause,  and  only  say  that  all  things  happen  in  a  certain  tle- 
lerminate  concatenation  ol  preceding  and  consequent  events  ; 
suppose,  further,  this  train  of  causes,  or  succession  of  events, 
accompanied  with  the  existing  state  of  virtue  and  of  vice, 
and  that  it  could  by  any  means  be  foreseen  by  the  Infinite 
]>lind,  then  merely  creating  those  powers  of  nature,  and  es- 
tablishing those  relations  of  thing?,  which  in  their  ordinary 
course,  and  by  their  mutual  action,  should  produce  precisely 
the  same  moral  condition  of  the  world,  ought  not  to  be  con- 
sidered as  subjecting  ihe  whole  to  the  laws  of  mechanical 
necessity.  And,  I  add,  tha<  creating  them  with  design  that 
this  natural  succession  shouid  take  place — that  effects,  just 
as  we  see  ihem  exist,  should  arise  out  of  the  established  or- 
der of  (he  universe,  this  desi^cn,  and  this  order  would  not  sure- 
ly constitute  a  systeai  of  fatality. 

If,  (hen,  freedom  of  mor  1  action  can,  by  any  possibility, 
exist  in  ti,e  rational  system — if  all  things,  even  the  Deity 
hifiiself,  be  not  snbjer.ted  in  an  inflexible  fate,  it  has  been  ren- 
dered evident,  I  presume,  that  the  most  universal  preordi- 
na'ion  miy  be  consistent  with  the  n)ost  complete  liberty  of 
the  mind  in  all  her  actions.  The  objection,  therefore,  which 
has  been  just  staled,  is  futile,  in  a  high  degree,  and  argues  an 


260 

Inconshlerate,  or  most  prejiuiiced  disregard  of  the  genuine 
structure  and  operations  of  our  moral  nature. 

OF    MISERY     AND     VICE,    AS  OBJECTS    OF     THE     DIVINE    DE- 
CREES. 

The  existence  of  vice  and  misery  in  the  works  of  God, 
is  esteemed  by  those  who  deny  the  divine  preordination  of 
all  events,  to  form  an  insuperable  objection,  equally  with  the 
former,  against  the  admission  of  the  doctrine,  involving,  as 
they  conceive  it  does,  the  deepest  imputation  on  his  good- 
ness and  his  holiness.  Small  reflection,  it  should  seem, 
would  be  requisite  to  demonstrate,  that  a  cavil  of  this  kind 
could  never  be  resorted  to,  where  the  subject  had  been  duly 
considered.  The  very  existence  of  these  evils  forms  an 
irrefutable  answer  to  the  objection ;  or  we  must  embrace  a 
principle  most  unworthy  the  divine  wisdom  and  power.  I 
have  no  hesitation  to  admit  that  their  existence,  by  whatever 
means  they  were  introduced,  or  for  whatever  end  they  were 
permitted,  entered  originally  into  the  designs  of  heaven,  for 
the  administration  of  this  world.  Their  being  is  as  great  a 
mystery  (o  reason  as  their  being ofdained.  To  say  that  they 
have  been  merely  permitted^  without  any  interference,  or 
concern  of  Almighty  God  in  the  actions  of  men,  is  only  at- 
tempting, by  the  illu'^ion  of  a  word,  to  throw  the  difficulty 
out  of  si'xht,  not  to  solve  it.  If  he  has  permitted  the  intro- 
duction of  evil,  has  it  not  arisen  out  of  the  constitution  of  his 


MO 

own  work  f  oi'  in  other  words,  had  its  birth  in  those  very 
laws  of  our  physical  and  moral  nature  which  he  has  establish* 
ed  in  the  universal  system  of  things  ?  Let  the  friends  of  this 
phraseology  reconcile  the  event  to  the  divine  perfections,  and 
the  friends  of  the  doctrine  of  universal  preordination  will  be 
able,  on  the  same  grounds,  to  demonstrate  the  consistency  of 
these  perfections,  with  the  decree  by  which  sin  freely  exists 
through  the  perverted  will  of  the  creature,  and  its  punishment 
necessarily  follows.  That  this  may  be  accomplished  without 
any  infringement  on  the  rational  liberty  of  the  mind,  our  own 
experience  suiSciently  attests.  If  it  be  esteemed  more  diffi- 
cult to  reconcile  the  misery  and  guilt  of  our  nature  with  the 
benignant  perfections  of  the  Deity,  this  difficulty  is  at  least 
equal  on  all  systems. 

In  examining  the  principles  of  Natural  Religion,  I  have 
already  endeavoured  to  vindicate  the  goodness  of  God  in  the 
existence  of  the  manifold  evils  of  human  life,  either  as  cor- 
rectors of  its  errors,  and  assistants  towards  regaining  its  ori- 
ginal perfection,  or  laying  the  foundation,  ultimately  for  its 
social  and  intellectual  improvement  and  happiness.  Here- 
after,  I  shall  contemplate  them  in  the  light  of  revelation,  and 
shew  how  the  infinite  benignity  and  wisdom  of  the  Eternal  is 
justified  and  illustrated  in  the  sacred  writings,  in  all  the  mise- 
ries which  have  overwhelmed  this  his  greatest  and  best  work. 


2n 


©F  THE  OBJECTS,    THE  ORDER,  AND    THE  CHARA€TRR9  OF 
THE  DIVINE  DECREES. 

In  the  eliicitladon  of  Ihc  general  subject  of  the  decrees, 
several  important  questions  have  been  offered  to  our  consid- 
eration by  theological  writers  of  different  sects,  which  merit 
our  attentive  reflection.  They  respect  chiefly,  the  objects 
of  the  decrees — the  order  in  which  they  have  been  arranged 
— the  characters  ascribed  to  them  in  the  holy  scriptures. 

1.  The  objects  of  the  decrees  and  purposes  of  God  our 
Creator  are  strictly  the  universe  of  things,  with  all  their  con- 
ditions and  changes ;  and  in  moral  agents  particularly,  their 
thoughts,  affections,  and  their  whole  conduct ;  the  advan- 
tages and  disadvantages  of  their  situation,  their  virtues  and 
their  vices.  From  eternity,  these  were  all  in  the  purview  of 
the  Divine  Mind,  and,  in  time,  embraced  within  the  designSj 
and  subjected  to  the  order  of  his  i^rovidence,  which  is  only 
the  operation  of  the  Supreme  Creator  in  the  execution  of  hi? 
eternal  purposes. 

2.  The  greater  part  of  those  writers  who  are  friendly  to 
the  system  of  divine  decrees,  afraid,  at  the  same  time,  of  seem- 
ing to  detract  from  the  holiness  of  God,  have,  in  order  to 
avoid  this  impioHS  censequencCj  thought  it  useful  to  conceive 


272 

of  the  divine  purposes  in  a  certain  order,  which  has,  there- 
fore, been  styled  the  order  of  tke  decrees.  E\ery  scheme, 
however,  for  arranging  them,  labours  under  the  same  essential 
defect ;  that  of  seeming  to  represent  a  succession  in  the  Di- 
vine Mind,  similar  to  what  must  necessarily  take  place  in  the 
designs  and  plans  of  men.  In  the  purposes  of  God  there  can 
be  no  succession.  The  entire  system  of  nature,  wi(h  all  iis 
changes,  is  at  once  present  to  his  view,  and  the  purpose  of 
giving  them  existence  is  one  act,  and  co  eternal  with  his  be- 
ing. He  sees  the  end  in  the  means,  and  the  means  in  the  end. 
So  that  any  order  applied  to  his  eternal  counsels  is  only  an 
error  in  our  own  conceptions.  An  order,  indeed,  must  be  ob- 
served in  their  execution.  And  this  perhaps  it  is,  which  has 
been  attempted  to  be  marked  in  this  expression  by  the  au- 
thors of  the  various  systems,  though  by  some  inaccuracy  of 
language,  transferred  to  the  decrees  themselves.  As  this  tech- 
nical phraseology,  however,  has  been  adopted  by  many  emi- 
nent divines  of  diiierent  sentiments,  and  modified  according 
to  their  respective  systems,  in  order  to  obviate,  or  evade  the 
difficulties  arising  out  of  the  introduction  of  sin  into  the  works 
of  God,  I  shall  briefly  stale  the  manner  in  which  the  subject 
has  been  attempted  to  be  explained,  by  the  three  prim  ipal 
sects;  the  Socinians,  the  Arminians,  and  the  Calvinists.  If 
we  should  not  perfectl}^  accord  with  any  one  of  these  great 
parties  in  religion,  and  utterly  reject  many  of  the  principles 
of  others,  still  it  is  useful  for  the  theological  studeni,  and  the 
judicious  christian,  to  be  informed  of  the  peculiar  tenets  of 


each,  with  as  much  precision  as  such  a  compendious  sjstem 
will  adaiit. 

1.  The  followers  of  Socinus  deny  the  decrees  of  God  as 
they'impiy,  ultima<ely,  anj  eternal  purpose  of  illustrating  the 
glorj  of  his  mercy,  or  his  justice,  in  the  salvation,  or  the  con- 
demnation of  men.     Their  general  principle  upon  this  sub- 
*  ject  may  be  expressed  in  the  following  summarj.^ — The  Su- 
preme Creator  decreeing,  from  the  beginning,  to  form  man  a 
moral  agent,  capable  equally  of  virtue,  or  of  vice,  determined 
to  commit  him  solely  to  Ihe  direction  of  his  own  powers,  sub- 
ject only  to  those  rewards  of  virtue,  or  chastisements  of  vice, 
which  naturally  arise  out  of  the  regular  and  fixed  course  of 
divine  providence.     The  penalties,  or  remunerations,  of  the 
one  or  of  the  oiher,  are,  according  to  thoT  ideas,  those  only 
which  are  caused  by  the  wiisdom,  or  folly,  the  discretion  or 
improvidence  of  men  themselves.     But  in  this,  and  in  all 
things  else,  the  ordination  and  immediate  agency  of  God  in 
giving  effect  to  his  own  laws  in  the  system  of  nature,  are.  In 
a  great  measure,  overlooked,  and  left,  it  is   to  be  feared, 
equally  out  of  their  scheme  of  doctrine,  and  the  minds  of 
their  disciples. 

But  they  object,  especially,  against  considering  either  the 

fall  or  the  recovery  of  mankind,  as  forming  any  object  of  the 

divine  decrees,  farther  than  the  general  purpose  of  sending 

a  prophet  to  enlighten   and  instruct  the  world.     As  meiu 

?,5 


2^4 

however,  arc  free  agents,  their  virtue,  or  Iheir  vice,  their  pi- 
ous use,  or  their  unholy  rejection  of  bis  revelation,  cannot 
properly  be  regarded,  even  as  subjects  of  foreknowledge,  and 
StiJl  less  of  any  divine  decree.  The  general  purpose,  there- 
fore, of  Ihe  Eternal,  to  punish  or  reward  them,  according  to 
iheir  deserts,  is  suspended  solely  on  the  actual  existence,  in 
time,  of  the  contingent  facts  which  constitute  their  merit,  or 
demerit.  This  system  appears  in  a  worse  form  in  many  of 
its  recent  disciples  than  it  did  in  the  founder  of  the  sect.  As 
it  has  been  embraced  by  a  great  portion  of  them,  it  can 
hardly  be  regarded  in  any  other  light  than  as  a  modified  the- 
ory of  Natural  Religion. 

2.  The  Arminians  admitting,  in  general  terms,  the  decrees 
of  God,  study  to  arrange  them  in  such  order  as  shall  be  most 
favourable  to  their  peculiar  system,  fixing  a  few  principal 
points  of  christian  doctrine,  but  omitting,  at  every  step  in 
their  progress,  some  portion  of  the  entire  chain  which  con- 
nects the  beginning  with  the  end.  The  outlines  of  their  the- 
ory may  be  traced  out  in  the  following  proposilious. — God, 
in  his  wise  decrees,  originally  determined  to  create  man  in 
perfect  innocence,  but  fallible — foreseeing  his  fall,  but  with- 
out any  regard  to  the  mode  of  its  accomplishment  in  their 
decree  or  to  that  train  of  seductions  which  led  to  the  fatal 
catastrophe. — The  next  object  of  the  decree,  was,  consider- 
ing man  as  fallen,  to  send  a  Saviour  into  the  world  as  the 
Tnedium  of  his  restoration  and  recovery— for  this  purpose,  he 


^7$ 

defermined  lo  impart  (o  all  men  sufficient  grace,  if  properly 
improved,  (o  bring  the  sinner  to  repentance,  and  to  assist 
the  penifent  to  fulfil  all  righteousness  ;  but  without  clearlj 
marking  the    distinction  between,  what  is  called  sufficient 
grace,  and  that  which  is  effectual ;  or  ratlier  tnaking  no  dis« 
tinction  between  them,  exce;)t  the  superior  means,  and  op- 
portunities enjoyed  by  one  above  another — finally,  it   wai 
decreed,  that  those  who  improve  their  means  and  opportuni- 
ties to  bincere  repentance,  shall  be  brought  to  eternal  salva- 
tion, whereas  those  who  wilfully  continue  in  their  sins,  shall 
be  consigned  to  just  perdition.     6ut  here  those  innumerable 
open,  or  secret,  and  often  indiscernible  causes  which  con- 
duce, in  different  minds,  to  sincere  repentance,  are  wholly 
left  out  of  the  purview  of  the  decree.     And  in  all  the  sy  steal 
of  these  good  men,  neither  the  fall  of  man,  nor  the  repent- 
ance of  any  of  his  posterity,  nor,  in  one  word,  any  act  of  a 
free  agent,  is   admitted  to  be  a  proper  object  of  divine  de- 
cree. 

Here  we  see  only  a  few  points  fixed  in  the  purposes  of 
Heaven  ;  and,  in  the  wide  intervals  between  them,  which 
embrace  the  greater  portion  of  human  life,  we  see  not  the 
actions  of  the  mind,  and  ihe  immense  circumference  of  mo- 
tives, occasions,  and  means  which  are  combined  for  the  pro- 
duction of  any  event,  and  particularly,  for  bringing  the  sin- 
ner to  repentance,  at  all  contemplated  in  the  decrees  of  God. 


27  f; 

By  the  iacguage  employed  by  the  writers  of  this  clasa  these 
causes  seem  to  be  thrown  entirely  without  the  control  of  his 
providence. 

The  creation  of  man  in  innocence,  is  the  first  point  fixed 
in  this  system.     Afterwards  we  find  nothing  in  which  the 
state  of  human  nature,  and  the  general  plan  of  redemption  is 
concerned,  before  the  promise  of  the  Saviour.     The  Fall, 
and  all  the  great  events  on  which  the  present  moral  condi- 
tion of  the  world  depeads,  enter  not,  in  their  view,  for  any 
place  in  the  divine  counsels;  because  any  decree  on  those 
subjects,  would  involve  the  voluntary  actions  of  men. — Could 
then,  let  me  ask ;  could  the  loss  of  human  innocence,  and 
the   corruption   of    the   whole   human   race   be   an   event 
that  might,  or  might  not  have  come  to  pass,  having  no  founda- 
tion of  certainty  in  the  constitution  of  things,  but  thrown  by 
the  principles  of  these  writers,  among  the  mass  of  doubtful 
actions,  or  the  caprices  of  accident  ?     Or  could  the  Om- 
niscient have  foreseen  the  transgression  of  man,  without  the 
foreknowledge  of  all  the  means  which  led  to  the  unhappy 
event,  and  by  which  it  was  effected  ?  Could  those  means  have 
existed  by  chance?  or  have  they  not  arisen  in  the  natural 
operation  of  the  laws  established  by  God  himself  in  the  mor- 
al world  ?     And  must  not  all  these  events,  even  to  the  min- 
utest circumstances  attending  them,  have  been  in  the  pur- 
view of  the  Diviae  Mind,  in  the  original  constitution  of  things. 


27? 

AjLid  what  further  can  be  intended  m  the  decrees  of  God,  by 
*fae  warmest  friends  of  this  phraseology  ? 

Almigbly  God,  in  sending  a  Saviour,  has  further  gra- 
ciously decreed,  according  to  tlieir  system,  to  impart  to  all 
men  grace  siifficienr,  if  wisely  improved,  for  all  the  purposes 
of  repentance  and  nev!  obedience ;  but  the  improvement  of 
that  grace,  they  add,  forms  no  object  of  the  decree,  but  is 
resigned  simply  and  entirely  to  the  will  of  man  himself.— 
But  these  principles  will  naturally  fall  to  be  more  particular- 
ly considered,  hereafter,  in  treating  of  the  Covenant  of 
Grace. 

3.  Calvinists,  on  this  subject,  are  thrown  into  two  great 
divisions  of  Supralapsarians,  and  Sublapsarians,  taking  their 
denominations  from  that  point  on  which  they  are  found  prin- 
cipally to  difter.  The  latter,  although  they  do  not  hesitate 
to  apply  the  decrees  of  God  universally  to  the  present  states 
and  actions  of  men,  whether  good,  or  bad,  yet,  like  the  Ar- 
minians,  study  to  exclude  the  Fall  from  the  counsels,  and 
purposes  of  Jehovah,  and  commence  their  decretal  system, 
only  after  man  has  already  become  mortal,  and  involved  in 
sin.  Before  that  period,  their  language,  at  least,  appears  to 
represent  the  Deity,  the  benignant  parent  of  the  universe,  in 
a  kind  of  inactive  state,  waiting  till  man  himself,  by  his  own 
independent  and  sinful  act,  fix  the  unhappy  destinies  of  his 
race.     The  cautious  timidity  with  which  these  writers  ap- 


proach  this  snbjecf,  betrays  their  secret  apprehenaion  that 
the  decrees  of  God,  to  which,  on  other  occasions,  they  free- 
ly appeal,  have,  in  the  production  of  sin,  some  sinister  influ- 
ence on  the  moral  hberty  of  man.  If  these  apprehensions 
were  well  founded,  they  ought  to  abandon  their  system  al- 
together. They  do  not  appear  to  reflect  that  the  freedom 
of  the  moral  agent  is  no  more  impaired  by  the  fall  of  the  sin- 
ner, than  by  the  regeneration  of  the  believer  ;  which  last, 
however,  they  strenuously  maintain  to  be  an  object  of  divine 
decree.  The  one  is  descending  from  a  state  of  innocence, 
into  a  state  of  sin,  the  other  is  precisely  the  reverse,  return- 
ing from  sin  to  holiness.  The  latter  easily  comports  with 
their  general  theory  ;  from  the  former  they  inconsistently 
shrink,  as  revolting  their  moral  feelings.  Their  view  of  the 
decrees  applies  to  mankind  only  since  the  Fall ;  and  is  confin- 
ed, almost  solely,  to  those  who  are  chosen,  out  of  the  mass 
of  the  human  race,  to  eternal  life ;  the  rest  being  left  to  per- 
ish in  the  corruption  of  their  natural  state. — In  all  other  parts 
of  their  scheme  it  coincides  with  that  of  their  Supralapsari- 
an  brethren. 

On  this  subject,  which  has  been  rendered  difficult,  princi- 
pally by  an  unguarded,  and  perhaps  by  an  inadequately  de- 
fined use  of  the  term  decree  ;  for  it  is  merely  the  will  of  God 
operatins:  in  the  laws  of  nature  to  the  accomplishrdent  of  their 
proper  ends,  whether  in  the  catural  or  moral  world,  the  Sa- 


279 

pralapsarians  hold,  at  least,  the  most  consistent  Ianp;uae:e.  To 
the  order  of  Ihe  decress,  Ihey  argue  that  the  end  proposed  to 
be  attained  must,  as  in  every  wise  system,  have  had  the  pri- 
ority in  the  contemplation  of  its  author.  After  that  the  means 
conducing  to  its  accomplishment  will,  with  propriety  follow. 
These  principles  may  appear  more  distinctly  in  the  outline 
of  thi3  scheme  which  is  exhibited  in  the  folloninc;  series  of 
propositions. —  Almighty  God  having  purposed  in  the  econ- 
omy of  this  world,  io  illustrate  the  union  of  his  mercy,  and 
his  justice,  and  in  the  prosecution  of  this  end,  to  display  the 
glory  of  his  Son,  decreed  to  create  man  holy,  but  free— and 
in  the  progress  of  his  ultimate  design,  he  decreed  the  fall  of 
our  first  parents  ;  that  is,  that  the  state  in  which  they  should 
be  placed,  and  the  whole  combination  of  motives  operating  on 
the  natural  principles  of  action,  should  most  freely  lead  to 
the  accomplishment  of  that  event,  so  distressing  in  itself,  but 
so  necessary  to  the  illustration  of  the  glory  of  his  grace — he 
decreed  in  consequence,  to  send  the  Saviour,  with  whom  he 
deposited  the  whole  economy  of  this  merciful  dispensation, 
placing  it  under  his  immediate  administration.  He  decreed, 
moreover,  the  salvation  of  a  rhosen  number  of  the  human 
race,  preparing  those  means  which  would  certainly  lead,  un- 
der the  direction  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  to  the  fulfilment  of  his 
gracious  purpose;  leaving  in  the  same  act,  those  who  should 
be  disobedient  and  unholy,  to  the  guilt  and  infelicity  of  their 
natural  state.  The  intention  of  the  divines  who  employ  this 
language,  is  simply  to  assert  the  universal  agency  of  God,  In 


280 

both  the  moral  and  physical  systems  of  nature ;  at  the  same 
time,  to  preserve  entire  the  freedom  of  the  human  mind,  and 
to  free  Almighty  God,  most  holy,  just,  and  good,  from  the 
blasphemous  imputation  of  being  the  author  of  sin. 

Are  not  the  universal  laws  of  nature  so  ordained  as  to  at- 
tain, by  their  natural  operation,  every  end  for  \vhich  they 
were  evidently  designed  by  the  Creator  ?  It  is  the  inquiry 
of  a  Supralapsarian — Can  any  event  spring  into  existence 
but  in  exact  conformity  with  those  laws,  the  nature  and  the 
ends  of  which  have  been  designed  by  God  ?  Admitting  this 
conclusion,  what  are  denominated  his  decrees  can  be  nothing 
more  than  the  development  of  the  laws  of  nature  both  moral 
and  physical,  according  to  his  will,  and  to  the  constitution  of 
the  agent,  and  the  subject  of  their  action  ;  free  where  morals 
and  accountability  are  concerned ;  necessary  where  the  ma- 
teriality of  the  subject  requires  it — and  certain  in  all.  For 
to  an  omniscient  Being,  who  is  perfectly  acquainted  with  the 
nature  and  influence  of  every  motive,  its  combination,  and  co- 
action,  with  all  other  means,  and  with  the  peculiar  tempera- 
ment of  each  Individual  agent,  moral  efifects  are  as  certain,  in 
their  order,  as  the  results  of  any  physical  causes  whatever. 
Apply  these  reflections  to  the  fall ;  though  it  has  taken  place 
in  conformity  with  the  divine  decree,  it  was  as  much  the  free 
effect  of  motive  on  an  intelligent  being  capable  of  being  sway- 
ed by  his  apetites  and  passions,  as  an}  of  the  ordinary  ac- 
tions of  human  life.     It  is  true,  the  agency  of  the  serpent  is 


281 

represented  as  the  medium  through  which  the  fatal  choice 
was  produced.  But  as  no  miraculous  power  is  alleged  in  (he 
case,  it  was  entirely  effected  bv  the  suasion  of  motives  freely 
addressed  to  the  natural  and  yet  uncorrupted  principles  of 
the  soul.  If,  then,  we  can  suppose  circumstances  to  exist, 
in  the  correspondence  of  the  dispositions,  still  innocent  of 
human  nature,  with  the  temptations,  addressed  to  them, 
which,  by  their  free  and  natural  action,  would  be  followed  by 
a  dereliction  of  duty,  would  the  will  of  God  giving  existence 
to  these  circumstances,  in  conformity  to  his  ultimate  designs, 
call  it  decree,  or  by  whatever  less  offensive  name  you  please, 
impose  any  fatal  necessity  upon  the  act,  or  render  the  divine 
agency  in  the  existence  of  those  circumstances,  in  the  smal- 
lest degree  more  arbitrary  or  unjust,  than  their  existence  by 
any  other  cause?  This  justification  of  the  principles  of  the 
Supralapsarian,  who  takes  it  as  an  acknowledged  fact,  that 
the  decrees  of  God  embrace  the  whole  system  of  the  uni- 
verse, appears  perfectly  conformable  to  the  dictates  of  the 
soundest  reason. 

If  his  antagonists  demand,  do  not  these  ideas  impute  the 
sin  of  man  to  his  Creator,  as  being,  if  not  immediately,  yet 
ultimately  and  indirectly  its  author?  He  confidently  replies, 
not  more  than  those  of  the  most  strenuous  defenders  of  our 
moral  liberty.  For  it  has  formerly  been  shewn,  that  we  al- 
ways act  with  the  most  perfect  consciousness  of  freedom  ic 

every  choice,  and  the  most  entire  control  over  our  own  ac- 

36 


285 

tions.  If  again  they  demand,  does  not  this  language  exhibit 
a  hard  and  cruel  representation  of  the  Supreme  Being?  he 
frankly  answers,  not  more  than  the  principles  of  those  who  ad- 
mit that  the  Almighty  and  Omniscient  Being,  who  created 
all  things,  must  have  foreseen,  yet  permitted  the  evil  which 
he  could  have  prevented,  and  formed  a  sjstem  out  of  which 
it  would,  freely  indeed,  but  infallibly  spring  ;  nay,  which  was 
necessary  to. accomplish  the  ultimate  designs  of  his  goodness 
and  mercy.  If  he  is  farther  pressed  with  the  difficulty  of 
accounting  for  the  fact,  that  a  wise  and  benevolent  Deity 
should  give  existence  to  a  world  subject,  by  his  decree,  to 
sin  and  its  consequent  miseries,  though  intended,  ultimately, 
as  a  conspicuous  theatre  of  his  benignity  ;— he  calmly  rests 
upon  the  justness  of  this  principle,  that,  what  might  or  might 
not  have  been  done  by  God  infinitely  powerful  and  wise,  is 
not  within  the  range  of  human  intellect  to  decide.  With  sub- 
mission therefore,  to  the  Divine  Wisdom,  he  resolves  the 
whole  into  the  sovereigntif,  that  is,  the  unsearchable  counsel 
of  Heaven  ;  comprising  designs,  and  ends,  and  means,  utter- 
ly beyond  the  comprehension  of  minds  so  limited  as  oura. 
And  this  is  a  solution  to  which  every  sect  in  religion,  or  phi- 
losophy, must  ultiuiately  have  recourse,  in  their  reasonings 
concerning  the  introduction  of  shi  into  the  works  of  God 


28^ 


THE  CHARACTERS  OF    THE  DECREES     ASCRIBED    TO    THEJjl 
IN  THE  HOLY    SCRIPTURES. 

Some  distinguishing  characters  of  the  divine  decrees,  either 
directlj,  or  by  obvious  implication,  ascribed  to  them  in  the 
hoi  J  scriptures,  will  contribute  to  elucidate  the  general  sub- 
ject, and  assist  in  the  explanation  of  many  important  ques- 
tions connected  with  them.  Those  which  chiefly  merit  the 
attention  of  the  metaphysician,  or  the  divine,  are,  their  eter- 
nity, their  freedom,  their  sovereignty,  their  wisdom,  their 
holiness,  their  absoluteness,  and  immutability. 

1.  That  which  primarily  merits  our  consideration  is* their 
eternify.  Nothing  which  implies  succession,  or  change,  is 
to  be  imputed  to  the  Infinite  Mind ;  so  that  all  his  purposes 
are  coeternal  with  himself.  Therefore  the  apostle  charac- 
terizes his  decree,  as  his  eternal  jmrpose ;  and  speaking  of 
believers,  he  says,  they  have  been  chosen  in  Christ  before 
the  foundation  of  the  world  ;  for  all  is  eternity  which  is  art* 
tecedent  to  the  commencement  of  time. 

A  metaphysical,  and  probably  improper  question,  as  cer- 
lainly  it  is  useless,  has  been  raised  upon  this  subject  by  a 
i^ain  curiosity — Whether  the  existence  of  the  Sovereign 
Mind  ought  to  be  considered  as  antecedent  to  his  decrees! 
Obvious  it  ig,  that,  in  contemplating,  or  speaking  of  theq?, 


284 

there  must  be  a  precedence  of  order  in  their  arrangement ; 
but  in  their  existence,  Ihere  can  be  no  priority  of  time  :  a?, 
in  contemplating  the  sun,  we  regard  the   body,   before  Ihe 
light  which  issues  from  it,  although,  in  strictness  of  concep- 
tion, the  effect  is  simultaneous  with  the  cause.      Perhaps  we 
may  say  of  this,  as  of  many  other  metaphysical  questions  ; 
that  it  is  a  vain  and  fruitless  effort  of  the  mind,  and  uselessly 
wasting  its   strength,  to  attempt  to  frame  ideas  on  subjects 
that  are  too  fine  and  subtle  to  be  embraced  by  the  human  in- 
tellect.    Every  thing  in  our  ideas,  relating  to  duration,  is  unit- 
ed with  succession.      Eternity,   in   its  proper  nature,  tran- 
scends the  ingenuity  of  the  mind  to  conceive.     And  disqui- 
sitions on  questions  of  such  extreme  subtlety,  generally  indi- 
cate only  feeble  and  unsatisfactory  efforts  to  apply  the  nar- 
rowness of  our  understanding  to  subjects  which,  from  their 
nature   must  forever  baffle  its  inquiries.      Subjects  so  sub- 
lime and  so  far  exalted  above  our  reach,  tend,  in  our  endeav- 
ours to  embrace  them,  only  to  humble  and  overwhelm  the 
soul.     But  as  far  as  our  conceptions  can  comprehend  the 
subject,  we  may  pronounce,  that  the  decrees  of  God,  which 
are  the  purposes  and  prescriptions  of  his  infinite  wisdom,  are 
coeternal  with  his  existence. 

2.  The  next  characteristic  of  the  decrees  which  we  have 
remarked,  is  their  freedom.  An  obvious  consequence  of  the 
perfect  moral  freedom  of  the  Divine  Being  in  all  his  coun- 
sels ;   which  excludes  the  idea  of  any  necessity  in  his  acts 


285 

resembling  that  under  which  the  physical  world  is  helil.  It 
is  declared  in  all  Ihe  symbols  of  the  o  Ihoaox  ietci;i  eil 
churches,  that  God,  from  eiernity^  did  most  wisely,  moM 
justly,  and  most  Jreely,  decree  whatsoever  comes  tu  pass. — 
The  only  objection  which  has  been  plausibly  urged  against 
(his  principle,  is  (hat  wliich  has  been  uiainl-iined  by  the  fa- 
mous German  philosopher  Leibnitz,  in  his  Theodice',  in  so 
superior  a  manner,  that  he  may  justly  be  esteemed  (he  father 
of  it.  His  maxim  is,  that  infinite  perfection  implies  necessity 
in  all  its  acts.  And  the  Eternal,  being  infinitely  wise  and 
good,  must,  from  the  unchangeable  rectitude  of  his  nature, 
choose  on  all  subjects,  only  and  necessarily  that  which  is 
best.  The  conclusion  which  he  infers  from  this  principle  is, 
that  the  system  which  God  hath  created,  and  the  order  of 
things  which  he  hath  established  in  it,  must,  of  all  possible 
systems  be  thebest  ;  that  is,  in  its  nature,  order,  and  arrange* 
ments,  be  the  most  perfect.  This  doctrine,  on  a  transient 
inspection,  is  captivating  to  a  speculative  mind  ;  yet  wlien 
closely  examined,  will  be  seen  to  be  liable  to  unanswerable 
objections.  It  proceeds  on  the  supposition  that  there  are 
ideas  of  good,  and  of  best  antecedent,  in  the  order  of  con- 
ception, to  the  idea  of  God,  and  independent  of  him,  out  of 
which  he  might  make  a  selection,  according  to  his  pleasure, 
in  organizing  a  created  system,  as  an  artist  may  select  out  of 
forms  already  existing,  such  as  may  best  correspond  with  his 
present  designs.  Whereas  nothing  can  exist  without,  or  in- 
dependent of  God.     He  formed  the  ideas  of  the  things,  with 


I 


286 

Ihe  fhings  themselves.  Nothing  is  better  or  best  in  nature 
but  as  he  halh  created  it,  and  fixed  its  relations.  Besides, 
these  are  deiinile  terms  of  comparison  among  things,  of  the 
same  kind  actually  existing.  Bui,  with  regard  to  plans  pos- 
sible to  infinite  wisdom,  it  is,  perhaps,  an  error  in  our  concep- 
tions, (o  suppose  that  there  is  any  one  which  can  be  pro- 
nounced the  best.  To  a  finite  subject  it  were  absurd  to  as- 
cribe this  superlative  quality.  And  if  the  subject  be  infinite, 
must  not  the  possible  combinations  in  an  infinite  system,  be 
infinite  and  endless  ?*' 

I  must  further  observe  on  the  idea  of  the  best  possible  sys- 
tem, and  the  necessary  nature  of  the  divine  decrees  which, 
as  a  natural  consequence,  has  been  deduced  from  it,  that  it 
is  pressed  with  two  difficulties  which  have  never  yet  been  sa- 
tisfactorily resolved ;  in  the  first  place,  the  unreasonableness 
of  presuming  that  Almighty  God  should  have  exhausted 
himself  in  the  production  of  the  universe,  or  should  ever 
have  exerted  any  ultimate  effort  of  omnipotence  ;  in  the  next 
place,  the  proximity  of  this  idea  to  the  fate  of  the  Stoics ; 
to  which  certainly  it  is,  in  language  at  least,  too  nearly  allied, 
which  svas  maintained  by  them,  to  be  antecedent,  and  supe- 
rior to  the  Deity. — The  conclusion,  therefore,  still  remains, 
that  the  decrees  of  God  are  most  free,  and  that  they  are  not 
either  arrested  or  controled  by  the  laws  of  necessity, 

*  Witherspoon's  Lectures. 


287 

3.  Their  Wisdom,  and  their  Sovereignty  in  the  next 
place,  are  usually  joined  together,  by  divines,  in  order  to  limit 
the  conclusions  on  each  side,  which  men  are  prone  rashly 
to  frame  concerning  them.  God,  as  sovereign  of  the  uni- 
verse, has  the  most  perfect  right  to  ordain  whatever  seemeth 
good  to  him.  And  though  all  his  acts  are  ever  most  just  and 
equitable,  yet,  often,  wrapped,  as  they  are,  in  the  profound 
depths  of  his  wisdom,  they  appear,  to  our  feeble  vision,  to 
be  covered  with  clouds  and  darkness.  His  rights,  as  an  in- 
finite sovereign,  ought,  at  all  times,  to  command  our  unmur- 
muring obedience ;  and  our  conviction  that  all  his  commands 
are  founded  in  equity  and  wisdom,  are  sufficient  to  engage 
our  submissive  acquiescence,  although  the  reasons  on  which 
they  move,  are  often  concealed  from  our  view.  In  the  whole 
order  of  nature,  and  of  providence,  what  we  cannot  explain, 
we  resolve  into  the  sovereignty  of  God.  Not  that  any  or- 
der, or  arrangement  of  his  may  ever  be  esteemed  arbitrary, 
and  without  reason  ;  but,  when  we  cannot  fathom  its  wisdom, 
his  authority,  which  is  only  another  term  by  which  to  ex- 
press his  sovereign  will,  and  his  rightful  dominion,  ought 
ever  to  be  deemed  a  sufficient  reason  for  the  obedience  and 
duty  of  children  to  their  heavenly  Father.  Frequently,  the 
feebleness  of  the  human  mind  is  called  to  submission  on  this 
ground,  arising  from  innumerable  events  occurring  to  our  ob- 
servation and  experience,  which  baffle  reason  to  account  for 
them,  which  elude  conjecture,  and  in  many  instances,  seem 
even  to  contradict  our  ideas  of  divine  goodness  and  justice. 


i>8S 

In  every  event,  it  is  a  sufficient  reason  to  a  pious  man  that  the 
Lord  hath  done  it.  Shall  not  the  Judge  of  all  the  earth  do 
right  ?  There  are  divines  who  extend  much  farther  their 
ideas  ot  the  sovereignty  of  God.  Nothing,  they  say,  is  either 
good  or  wise  in  itself j  but  only  as  it  is  made  so  by  the 
divine  wilL  According  to  this  principle  the  will  of  God  is 
the  sole  reason  why  one  action  is  superior  in  goodness  and 
excellence,  to  another,  and,  in  one  word,  why  virtue  is  pre- 
ferable to  vice.  Perhaps  these  writers  have  a  better  meaning 
than,  to  us,  their  terms  seem  to  convey  ;  but,  apparently, 
they  destroy  the  very  foundation  of  the  moral  attributes  of 
the  Deity,  and  resolve  the  whole  of  his  perfection  into  pow- 
er and  will. 

The  holy  scriptures  are  full  of  the  most  explicit  testimo- 
nies, both  to  the  wisdom  and  sovereignty  of  the  divine  de- 
crees. *'  O  the  depth  of  the  riches  iunh  of  the  wisdom 
and  knowledge  of  God!  How  unsearchable  are  his  judg- 
ments, and  hi?;  ways  past  finding  oat !  Even  so.  Father  ! 
for  so  it  seemed  good  in  thy  sight !"  But,  with  the  most  po- 
etic and  striking  imagery  is  the  sovereignty  of  the  divine 
government,  in  the  dominion  of  providence,  represented  in  the 
close  of  the  book  of  Job.  That  sublirne  composiiiun  is  ac- 
knowledged, by  the  best  writers,  to  contain  a  dramatic  ex- 
hibition of  the  difficulties  arising  to  reason  from  the  atH'.c*ioas 
of  good  men,  and  the  pro.-^perity  of  the  wir'-.c;;l  in  the  world. 
After  the  friends  of  Job  had  wearied  themselYes  with  vain 


289 

discussions  on  this  embarrassing  subject ;  when  the  Almigh- 
ty is  introduced,  speaking  out  of  the  whirlwind  to  decide  the 
question,  instead  of  reasoning  on  the  wisdom  and  equity  of 
his  proceedings,  he  simply  displays  the  majesty  of  his  pow- 
er in  the  works  of  nature.  The  humiliating  inference  from 
which  was, — your  intellects  are  too  feeble  to  comprehend 
the  wisdom  of  the  principles  on  which  my  government  moves. 
Vain  it  is,  to  attempt  to  unfold  them  to  your  darkened  minds. 
I  display  before  your  senses  the  majesty  of  ray  power,  that 
it  may  arrest  your  cavils  against  my  inscrutable  purposes, 
and  leave  on  your  hearts  the  deep  conviction,  that  all  the 
dispensations  of  the  omnipotent  Jehovah  must  be  e(juitable 
and  just. 

Submission  to  the  sovereignty  of  the  divine  administra- 
tion, or  the  habitual  acknowledgment  of  this  principle,  in 
all  the  events  that  befall  ourselves,  is  deeply  humbling  to  the 
self-confidence  of  human  vanity.  The  mind  is  apt  to  revolt 
at  a  doctrine  asserting  even  divine  power  in  a  tone  apparent- 
ly so  arbitrary,  and  at  acts  the  reasons  of  which  lie  far 
above  its  comprehension.  It  is  only  after  repeated  trials  of 
its  own  powers  in  vain  reasonings,  and  abortive  conjectures, 
to  explain  the  ways  of  God,  that,  lost  in  the  complicatiooj 
and  depth  of  its  inquiries,  it  is  constrained  at  length  to  con- 
fess its  Impotence,  and  to  acquiesce  in  the  appointments  of 
Heaven,  simply  sajing  it  is  the  Lord,  let  him  do  what  seem- 

eth   him  good. — In  its  first  struggles  with  the  ideas  of  the 

ST 


230 

sovereignty,  and  the  uusearchable  counsels  of  God,  it  resem' 
bles  a  realive  steed  chaffing  and  fretting  himself  with  his  own 
spirit,  before  he  has  learned  to  yield  to  the  control  of  the 
bit.  But  when  he  has  been  trained  to  proceed  submissive- 
ly along  his  prescribed  path,  he  moves  with  ease  and  satisfac- 
tion  to  himself,  guided  by  the  wisdom  of  the  mind  that  di- 
rects him.  So,  when  the  christian,  humbled  by  many  fruit- 
less  and  disappointed  efforts,  to  push  his  inquiries  on  these 
obscure  subjects  beyond  the  powers  of  the  human  mind,  has 
learned,  at  length,  justly  to  estimate  his  own  force,  he  per- 
ceives an  unspeakable  tranquillity  of  heart,  in  piously  sub- 
mitting, on  all  those  questions  which  he  cannot  explain,  to 
the  will  and  the  wisdom  of  Almighty  God.  The  difficulties, 
however,  which  have  embarrassed  this  subject  to  certain 
writers,  have  arisen,  chiefly,  from  the  falsity  of  theii  own 
conceptions,  and  improperly  confounding  the  ideas  of  sove- 
reigniy,  and  of  arhxirary  will.  None  of  the  acts  of  the  di- 
vine go\  ernment  are  ever  arbitrary  in  their  principle,  or  take 
place  without  the  most  perfect  reason ;  but  the  reasons  on 
which  they  move  are  often  far  removed  beyond  the  ken  and 
elude  the  penetration  of  our  minds.  And  this  is  all  that  is 
intended  by  a  wise  man  in  speaking  of  the  sovereignty  of  th? 
divine  counsels. 

From  a  similar  error  in  conception  proceeds  the  offence 
which  some,  otherwise  worthy  and  good  men,  have  conceiv- 
ed against  the  doctrine  of  divine  preordination  applied  to  the 


201 

tverlasling  states  of  the  human  race,  as  if  it  ioipiied  that 
some  sinners  are  chosen  (o  the  inheritance  of  eternal  life,  by 
an  unreasonable  predilection.     This  is  never  the  meaning  of 
any  writer  who  thinks  respectfully  of  the  divine  economy. 
Let  us  compare  the  preordinations  of  Heaven  with  regard 
lo   the   present,   and  the  future   world.     There  is,  in  many 
respects,  a  manifest  analogy  between  them.     And  the  same 
reasonings  which  demonstrate  the  divine  decrees  with  rela- 
tion to  the  various  conditions  of  the  present  life  to  exist  with- 
out any  infringement  on  the  moral  liberty  of  man,  or  impiach- 
ment  of  the  justice  of  God,  apply  equally  to  the  destinations 
of  eternity.     The  states  and  conditions  of  men  to  which 
they  are  severally  appointed  in   this  world,  are  never  sepa- 
rated in  (he  decr€e  of  God,   from  the  industry,  the  pru- 
dence, the  talents,  and  all  the  means  which,  in  the  order  of 
nature,  contribute  lo  the  effect.     And  it  is  equally  true  that, 
wherever  those  means  are  properly  applied,  it  is  the  usual 
course  of  providence  that  they  accomplish  their  end  ;  they 
gain  and  fix  that  state  in  life  for  the  individual  which  is  the 
will  of  God. — Let  us  transfer  this  analogy  to  the  future  state 
of  each  man.     This  state  cannot  be  presumed  to  be  the  ob- 
ject of  the   divine  decree,  independent  of  the  moral  qualifi- 
cations which  prepare  him  for  its  possession,  nor  those  quali- 
fications independent  of  the  means  of  divine  culture  which 
he  enjoys,  and  the  pious  improvement  which  he  makes  of 
them.     And,  let  it  be  remembered,  that  the  aids  which  we 
possess  of  enlarging  our  knowledge  in  divine  truth,  and  cul- 


29:2 

tivating  in  the  heart  a  divine  taste,  are  as  certain  in  their  ope- 
ration, and,  under  the  guidance  and  influence  of  the  Holy 
Spirir,  as  effectual  to  their  end,  according  to  their  extent, 
and  application,  as  any  train  of  causes  in  the  natural  world. 
Included  in  the  decree  of  election,  therefore,  are  all  those 
means  of  instruction,  and  motives  of  holiness  essentially  con- 
nected with  salvation, — those  opportunities  of  divine  infor- 
mation, those  advantages  of  situation, — of  example — of  ex- 
ternal circumstances — of  providential  dispensations — and  all 
those  infinite,  and  almost  imperceptible  aids,  and  motives 
tvhich  under  the  influences  of  that  divine  teacher,  are  calcu- 
lated to  enlighten  the  understanding,  to  touch,  and  trans- 
form, and  mould  the  heart. — The  sovereignty  of  the  de- 
cree, therefore,  respects  not  more  the  end,  or  the  eternal 
life  of  the  elected  sinner,  than  the  various  means  of  moral  cul- 
ture, which  have  the  effect,  under  the  teaching  of  the  Di- 
vine Spirit,  to  prepare  the  soul  for  her  final  destination. 
For,  in  the  view  of  God,  the  means,  and  the  end,  are  essen- 
tially, and  most  intimately  conjoined,  and  both  embraced  in 
the  same  act. 

In  this  consideration  of  the  subject,  individual  election  is* 
analogous  to  the  elevation  of  particular  nations,  as  of  Israel, 
to  a  state  of  peculiar  favour  with  God  :  a  species  of  election 
"with  which  all  parties  profess  to  be  perfectly  reconciled. 
Analogous  I  say  ;  for  the  obvious  effect  of  this  preference^ 
is  the  enjoyment  of  special  privilege)?,  instructions,  and  re- 


293 

ligious  orilinances,  designed  to  form  the  understanding  and 
the  heart,  to  the  love  and  obedience  of  di\iiu;  :iuih,  by 
which  we  have  seen  the  ancient  church  cherished  in  the  bo- 
som of  that  favoured  nation,  not  so  much  by  any  direct  and 
miraculous  operation  on  the  hearts  of  the  people,  as  by  the 
excellence  of  her  sacred  instifntions.  So  likewise  is  (ormed 
the  believer,  nnder  the  grace  of  the  gospel,  by  the  due  im- 
provement of  his  spiritual  and  precious  privileges,  accompa- 
nied by  the  blessing  of  the  Holy  Spirit. 

Against  the  sovereignty  of  the  divine  decrees,  in  the  elec- 
tion of  nations,  communities,  families,  and  even  individuals 
to  peculiar  means  of  moral  cultivation,  leading  to  the  ultimate 
ends  of  religion,  in  the  sanctificallon  of  the  heart,  the  great- 
est assertors  of  human  liberty,  or  revilers  of  divine  decrees, 
find  nothing  to  object ;  for  the  fact  is  before  their  eyes. 
And  in  the  formation  of  a  believer  into  the  image  of  Christ, 
there  is  nothing  different  in  the  means,  or  motives  employed, 
from  those  which  operate  in  the  whole  church  ;  unless  that  in 
particular  instances,  they  may  be  applied,  by  the  blessed  Spi- 
rit, with  greater  energy,  or  a  finer  adaptation  to  the  charac- 
ter and  state  of  different  minds.  For  the  lights,  and  instruc- 
tions, and  motives  to  conversion,  given  to  the  church  at  large, 
are  those  only  which  operate  on  each  individual,  and  are 
abundant  for  all  the  purposes  of  piety,  in  the  hands  of  that 
omniscient,  and  all-potverful  spirit,  who  knows  how  to  reach 
the  heart,  through  them,  with  the  finest  insinuation,  to  move 


294 

it  by  the  moat  affecting  touches,  and  to  form  it  ultimately 
ioto  the  image  of  his  own  holiness,  by  continual,  and  almost 
insensible  impressions. 

We  behold  here  the  sovereignty  of  the  divine  decrees 
placed  upon  an  intelligible  and  liberal  footing.  We  behold 
likewise  the  perfect  correspondence  of  human  liberty,  and 
the  natural  relation  of  means  and  end,  with  the  powerful  will, 
and  all-presiding  wisdom  of  Almighty  Goc*. 

4.  The  holiness  and  justice  of  the  decrees  have  created 
KO  controversy  among  those  who  acknowledge  their  exist- 
ence ;  nor  can  there  remain  a  doubt  concerning  them  in  the 
minds  of  any  who  believe  in  the  being  of  God  most  holy  and 
most  wise. 

5.  Much  more  disputation  has  been  awakened  with  regard 
to  the  attributes  of  absoluteness  and  immidahilityy  ascribed 
to  them  by  the  orthodox.  And  certainly  no  subjects  seem 
more  to  have  embarrassed  metaphysicians,  and  divines,  or  to 
have  excited  among  them  a  greater  variety  of  absurd  specu- 
lations. Some  writers  you  have  seen  maintaining  the  posi- 
tion, that  there  can  be  no  certainty  in  free  actions  antece- 
dent to  their  existence.  And,  to  preserve  the  consistency 
of  their  principles,  they  are  obliged  to  deny  the  prescience 
of  God ;  or,  with  the  ancient  Stoics,  and  a  great  portion  of 
modern  philosophers,  to  subject  the  whole  universe  io  the 


29.') 

cheerless  laws  of  necessity.  Others,  constrained  by  their 
reason  to  a(iQiit  the  universal  foreknowledge  of  God,  have,  in 
order  to  account  for  the  divine  prescience,  had  recourse  to 
an  absurd  principle  of  the  school-men,  called  by  them  sci- 
entia  mediae  which  implies  an  antecedent  apprehension  of  all 
things  in  the  Divine  Mind,  in  their  proper  nature,  time,  and 
place,  resemblini;  fhe  immediate  vision  of  all  objects  as  in 
perspective  ;  as  if  present ;  but  abstracted  from  all  consid- 
eration of  their  mutual  relations  as  cause  and  effect,  whence 
any  rational  inference  could  be  formed  concerning  their  ex- 
istence. It  is  the  contemplation  of  the  universe  throughout 
its  whole  duration  and  extent  as  a  present  object ;  it  is  the 
knowledge  simply  of  the  facts,  independent  of  every  other 
consideration,  by  a  mysterious  power  in  the  divine  nature, 
DO  similitude  to  which  has  ever  been  imparted  to  any  of  his 
creatures.  It  is,  I  presume,  a  mere  absurdity  in  ocir  concep- 
tions. 

But  the  opinion  which  many  pious  and  worthy  men  have 
embraced,  of  a  necessity  in  our  actions,  which  does  not  re- 
move their  guilt,  deserves  a  more  particular  consideration. — 
It  is  said  to  be  a  necessity  arising  out  of  the  natural  inclina- 
tions of  the  mind,  and,  as  the  action  entirely  concurs  with  our 
will,  it  creates  a  feeling  of  liberty  in  pursuing  our  own  pleas- 
ure, while  governing  our  conduct  with  a  force  not  only  cer- 
tain in  the  event,  but  irresistible  in  its  cause.  I  am  willing 
to  believe  that  these  good  men,  many  of  whom  are  distin- 


296 

guiahed  by  their  pious  and  excellent  writings,  mean  no  more 
by  this  phraseology,  than  I  have  studied  to  express  by  that 
eertainty  which  I  have  shewn  may,  and  to  the  Divine  Mind, 
does  ever  accompany  moral,  as  well  as  physical  causes.  But 
1  conceive  their  language  to  be  exceplionable,  and  liable  to 
dangerous  abuse.  Their  reasonings  in  many  of  their  princi- 
ples, too  evidently  coincide  with  the  doctrines  of  the  Hobbe- 
sian  school. 

The  certainly  of  all  the  purposes  of  God,  is  the  chief 
ground  on  which  these  writers  maintain  the  doctrine  of  neces- 
sily.  The  one  they  presume  to  be  involved  in  <he  other. 
On  the  contrary,  I  conceive,  that  there  is  a  clear  and  intelli- 
gible distinction  between  the  ideas  of  necessity  and  of  cer- 
tainty, which  as  happens  in  many  clher  moral  and  intellect- 
ual truths,  can  be  more  easily  conceived,  or  understood,  by 
an  internal  feeling,  than  explained  in  precise  and  definite 
terms,  which  must  convey  ideas  too  fine  and  simple  to  be 
analyzed  in  language.  All  men  can  easily  understand  the 
difference  between  a  thing  certainly  done  by  a  free  cause, 
and  the  same  thing  accomplished  by  an  internal  but  unper- 
ceived  force,  so  that  it  could  not  be  otherwise  than  it  is. 

3Iany  excellent  men  who  profess  to  be  the  patrons  of  this 
system  of  necessity,  but  whose  language,  I  am  persuaded,  is 
more  in  error  than  their  hearts,  lay  it  down  as  an  axiom  in 
their  metaphysics,  that  the  will  is  irresistibly  determined  by 


297 

the  strongest  motive  at  the  time  before  the  minJ,  and  can- 
not act  otherwise  than  it  does  ;  not  sufficienlly  attending  to 
the  entire  difference  between  the  nature  and  movements  of 
mind  and  of  matter,  of  motive,  and  of  physical  impulse.  How 
can  it  be  known  that  it  is  the  strongest  motive  which,  in  every 
instance,  governs  our  choice  ?  Do  you  say,  as  is  commonly 
done,  because  it  does  govern  ?  This  circle  is  obviously  beg- 
ging the  principle  in  question — it  governs  our  choice  because 
it  is  the  strongest  motive  ;  and  it  is  the  strongest  motive  be- 
cause it  governs  our  choice.  In  opposition  to  this  pretended 
maxim,  the  soundest  metaphysicians,  and  the  most  accurate 
observers  of  the  operations  of  the  mind,  agree  with  the  learn- 
ed and  profound  Dr.  Reid  of  Glasgow,  that  we  often  act  ac- 
cording to  the  direction  of  a  weaker  motive  ;  and  sometimes 
act  without  any  perceptible  motive  at  all. 

Although  the  mind  seldom  acts  without  motive  ;  yet  it  is 
not  motive  which  exclusively  determines  its  volitions  ;  or  is 
the  sole  cause  of  action.  This  would  be  reducing  action  to 
a  mechanical  operation,  and  justify  those  material  analogies, 
in  explaining  its  nature,  which  I  have  before  condemned.-*- 
The  proper  effect  of  motive  is  to  solicit  and  excite  the  mind, 
and  to  put  it  into  a  state  of  action.  But  I  have  a  power  with- 
in me  which  determines  my  choice,  ou  a  view  more  deliberate, 
or  more  rapid,  of  the  motives  before  it.  If  you  asli  aie  to 
explain  that  power — I  feel  it — I  am  senijible  that  I  exercise 
it — and,  in  the  feeling  and  exercise  I  understand  the  act. 


•298 

Every  man  may,  in  the  same  manner,  feel  and  understand  ll 
by  attending  to  the  operations  of  his  own  mind.  But  I  an> 
no  more  capable  of  explaining  it  in  terms,  than  I  can  explain 
the  sensation  of  seeing.  The  perception  is  too  simple.  It 
IS  understood  by  Ihe  mind,  only  in  the  act  of  perceiving,  or 
exerting  its  power  of  volition.  This  does  not  lessen  the 
clearness  and  certainty  of  the  idea.  It  is,  perhaps,  the  rea- 
son why  this  idea  is  peculiarly  clear.  It  is  among  the  pri- 
mary sensations  of  our  nature.  And  in  no  other  way,  than 
these  original  sensations,  are  those  ideas  that  are  emphatically 
and  happily  called  first  truths,  or  axioms  in  science,  which 
»  are  the  elements,  and  clearest  materials  of  all  our  knowledge, 
conveyed  to  the  intellect.  They  are  the  impressions  of  the 
Land  of  God  upon  the  mind ;  convictions  resulting  from  the 
very  constitution  of  our  nature.  Thus  am  I  conscious  of 
my  liberty,  or  power  over  my  own  acts,  in  the  acts  them- 
selves. 

Upon  the  whole  view  of  this  subject,  the  result  is,  that  I 
act  with  the  most  perfect  freedom.  Motive,  though  it  influ- 
ences, does  not  necessarily  determine  my  choice.  Yet  such 
certainty  there  is  in  the  actions  of  rational  and  moral  beings, 
according  to  their  dispositions,  education,  habits,  and  the 
whole  atmosphere  of  motives  which  encompasses  them,  as 
lays  as  a  foundation,  among  men  themselves,  in  their  social 
relations,  for  the  most  useful  general  knowledge  of  one  an-.. 
other,  and  in  God  for  the  most  perfect  foreknowledge  of  all 


209 

the  actions  of  life,  he  having  formed  the  various  tempera- 
ment of  individuals,  and  disposed,  in  his  providence,  the  whole 
train  of  motives,  to  the  most  minute,  and  often  imperceptible, 
which  continual!/  operate  upon  all  the  springs  and  principles 
of  action  ;  both  which,  the  temperament  of  the  individual, 
and  the  succession  and  combination  of  motives  he  has  con- 
stituted, and  ordained,  and  governs,  in  such  a  manner,  in  his 
church,  under  the  all-wise  direction  of  his  Holy  Spirit,  as 
most  effectually,  yei  most  freely,  to  accomplish  ail  his  most 
wise  and  holy  purposes. 

Thus  have  I  unfolded  the  ideas  involved  in  the  technical 
and  systematic  phrase — the  Decrees  of  God ;  which,  being 
interpreted  by  the  obvious  and  philosophic  language  of  the 
Laws  of  Nature,  or  its  various  powers  and  tendencies  of  ac- 
tion, from  which  proceed,  under  God,  as  his  organs  of  opera- 
tion, all  events,  whether  natural  or  moral  in  the  universe, 
these  decrees,  which  appear,  to  certain  writers,  with  such  a 
formidable  aspect,  stand  on  plain  and  intelligible  ground,  ac- 
knowledged, when  rightly  understood,  by  all  the  best  friends 
of  science  and  religion. 

From  the  whole  of  these  reflections  it  results,  that  the  de- 
crees of  God  are  eternal,  like  his  will  and  purposes  in  the  laws 
of  nature ; — they  are  most  certain  in  their  consequences, 
that  is,  they  are  absolutely  ordained,  a  term  equivalent  to  the 
former,  except  that  it  seems  to  carry  in  it  more  of  the  author^ 


301) 

ity  on  which  ail  depends ;  and,  finally,  like  the  same  lawg, 
Ihev  are  immutable.  This  is,  obviously,  the  amount  of  the 
proposition  in  our  confession,  and  catechisms,  that  the  de- 
crees of  God  are  ahsolutd  and  unchangeable,  which  to  some 
sects  of  christians,  has  given  great,  and,  I  presume,  unneces- 
sarj  offence. 

From  the  interpretation  which  has  been  given  to  this  im- 
portant proposition,  we  perceive  the  coincidence  of  reason, 
with  religion  ;  and  the  support  which  science,  justly  explain 
ed,  may  often  render  to  revelation. 


OF   THE 

COVENANT  OF  WORKf«i 

AND    THE 

FALL  OF  MAN. 


I  PROCEED,  in  the  next  place,  to  the  consideration  of  the 
Covenant  of  Works,  and  the  fall  of  Man.  This  Covenant, 
as  it  is  contemplated  in  our  systems,  is  the  transaction  repre- 
sented to  have  taken  place  between  man  and  his  Creator  at 
his  first  foroiation,  wherein  a  law  of'  duty  was  prescribed  to 
him,  under  the  explicit  threatening  of  death,  in  case  of  trans- 
gression, and  the  implied  promise  of  life,  on  the  condition  of 
obedience.  His  whole  duty,  however,  in  this  covenant,  was 
collected  in  a  single  prohibition  as  its  test.  It  is  proper  to 
observe,  that  the  term  covenant  is  not  employed  in  the  his- 
tory of  this  transaction  by  the  sacred  writer.  But  it  is  not 
the  object  of  the  holy  scriptures  to  arrange  for  us  systems, 
with  scientific  precision  and  method.  They  simply  express 
things  in  a  free  and  narrative  order,  so  as  to  be  most  easily 
conceived,  and  applied  to  use  by  the  plainest  readers ;  and 
this  diffusive  style  has  been  collected,  by  divines,  into  spe- 
cia*  propositions,  and  disposed,  according  to  the  order  and 
dependence  of  ideas,  into  a  scientific  form,  which,  for  the  con- 


302 

venieace  of  arrangement,  and  conciseness  of  expression,  re- 
quires, frequently,  a  peculiar  and  technical  phraseology.  Of 
this  we  have  an  example  in  this  term.  In  the  strictness  of 
meaning  usually  annexed  to  it,  a  covenant  could  not  take 
place  between  the  Supreme  Jehovah,  and  the  insect  man. 
For  it  properly  signifies  a  stipulation  between  persons  who 
are,  in  some  degree,  equal  and  free.  Yet,  as  far  as  such  an 
agreement  can  be  supposed  to  exist  between  parties  of  such 
infinite  disparity  as  (he  Creator  and  the  creature,  it  will  be 
found  to  be  contained  in  this  precept  to  Adam.  In  it  a  duty 
is  to  be  performed — a  reward  is  proposed  for  obedience— and 
a  penalty  denounced  in  case  of  transgression.  For,  although 
the  reward  is  not  explicitly  stated  in  terms,  it  is  manifestly 
involved  in  the  threatening.  If  death  was  the  forfeiture  for 
disobedience,  the  necessary  implication  was,  that'life  was  the 
alternative  for  obedience. 

Having  justified  the  technical  denomination  which  this 
transaction  has  received  among  divines,  it  is  only  necessary, 
fiarther,  to  suggest  that  it  is  spoken  of,  in  our  systems,  under 
two  different  appellations,  being  sometimes  styled,  from  its 
condition,  the  Covenant  of  Works,  and  sometimes,  from  its 
implied  reward,  the  Covenant  of  Life. 

Various  circumstances  in  the  constitution,  administration, 
and  appendages  of  the  covenant,  demand  our  most  serious  in- 
quiries.    1.  In  the  first  place,  the  peculiar  selection  of  a  com- 


"803 

xnand  or  prohibition  for  the  trial  of  Adam's  obedience.  2.  In 
the  second  place,  the  full  implication  of  the  promise  and  the 
threatening.  3.  Thirdly,  the  representative  character  of  our 
first  father  in  this  transaction.  4.  And  lastly,  the  significa- 
tion of  the  tree  of  knowledge  of  good  and  evil,  and  of  the 
tree  of  life. 

1.  on  the  selection  of  an  object  for  the  trial  of 
man's  obedience. 

When  we  consider  the  natural  imbecility  of  the  human 
mind,  and  the  limited  sphere  to  which  the  range  of  its  ideas 
is  confined,  it  cannot  be  surprising,  if,  in  the  revelation  of  tho 
divine  will,  in  the  holy  scriptures,  as  well  as  in  that  natural 
revelation  inscribed  on  the  face  of  the  universe,  we  should 
find  many  facts  which  it  is  difficult,  and  some  which  tran- 
scend the  utmost  powers  of  reason  to  explain.  The  enemies 
of  revealed  religion  examine,  with  scrupulous  ingenuity,  eve- 
ry part  of  that  sacred  volume  which  contains  its  history  ;  and 
if  its  friends  are  not  able  to  solve  to  the  satisfaction  of  a  cap- 
tious philosophy,  all  the  questions  which,  either  the  obliquity 
of  ignorance,  or  the  peiversity  of  genius  can  raise  upon  it, 
they  are  inclined  to  reject  the  whole  as  a  fable.  No  part  of 
the  whole  system,  perhaps,  has  been  exposed  to  bolder  in- 
quiries than  the  Mosaic  account  of  the  fall  of  man,  or  been 
treated  with  more  indecent  levity  than  the  test  of  his  obe- 
dience proposed  by  divine  wisdom  in  the  fruit  of  the  for- 
bidden tree. 


304 

From  the  earliest  dawn  of  science,  the  speculations  of  phi- 
losophy have  been  employed,  without  being  able  to  arrive  at 
any  satisfactory  conclusions  on  the  subject,  to  account  for 
the  introduction  of  evil  into  the  works  of  an  all-powerful, 
wise,  and  benevolent  Deity.  Revelation  has  proposed  only 
a  few  simple  facts  relative  to  it,  without  explicitly  unfolding 
the  inscrutable  relations  which  it  holds  to  the  purity  and  ho- 
liness of  the  divine  nature  ;  or  pointing  out  the  operations  of 
the  human  mind  in  its  progress  from  innocence  to  guilt.  The 
first  parents  of  the  human  race,  had,  already,  the  law  of  na- 
ture written  on  their  hearts.  It  pleased  the  Creator,  how- 
ever to  make  proof  of  their  constancy  and  perseverance  in 
practical  holiness,  by  an  appeal  to  the  great  principle  of  all 
duty,  which  consists  in  obedience  simply  to  the  will  o(  God, 
For  this  purpose  it  was  requisite  to  impose  upon  the  con- 
science some  positive  injunction  ;  that  is,  one  to  which  no 
natural  morality,  or  immorality  is  attached,  but  the  obligation 
to  which  rested  solely  upon  the  divine  command  ;  without 
any  other  moral  consideration.  From  an  action  naturally 
immoral,  a  holy  nature  would  instinctively  shrink ;  so  that  no 
temptation  from  that  quarter  could  be  made  to  reach  it.  But 
the  act  being  originally  indifferent,  the  mind  could  approach 
it  near  enough  to  contemplate  it  on  every  side  whence  an  in- 
sidious suggestion  could  be  thrown  in  to  induce,  for  a  mo- 
ment, an  oblivion  of  the  authority  of  Heaven.  Here  would 
be  opened  a  field  in  which  the  tempter,  the  great  enemy  of 


305 

God  and  man,  might  please  himself  with  the  hope  of  operat- 
ing, not  wholly  without  success. 

x^ccordingly,  the  subject  which  Divine  Wisdom  selected 
for  this  probation,  was  the  fruit  of  a  single  tree,  of  specious 
appearance,  which  alone  was  prohibited  to  man,  of  all  the  en- 
joyments furnished  by  the  whole  range  of  nature,  and  with 
this  solitary  exception,  freely  indulged  to  his  use.  This  se- 
lection has  afforded  abundant  matter  of  objection  to  igno- 
rance, and  of  sarcasm  to  wit.  Why  was  the  proof  of  human 
virtue,  it  is  asked,  and,  with  it,  the  most  important  conse- 
quence to  the  whole  family  of  mankind  suspended  on  an  ac- 
tion so  trivial,  if  not  contemptible,  to  use  their  own  phrase, 
as  the  eating  of  an  apple  ?  Why  was  it  not  rested  on  some 
prominent  precept,  at  least,  of  the  moral  code  1  To  these 
inquiries  let  me  answer,  that  we  cannot,  in  all  cases,  and  that 
we  can,  perhaps,  in  very  {^y^^  enter  into  the  reasons  of  the 
divine  conduct,  either  in  the  structure,  or  the  government  of 
the  nniverse.  In  the  present  instance,  however,  we  have  it 
in  our  power  to  propose  some  plausible  conjectures,  which 
may  furnish  sufficient  grounds  for  the  vindication,  if  not  the 
perfect  explanation  of  this  portion  of  the  divine  economy,  so 
little  capable  of  illustration  by  any  analogies  drawn  from  the 
dflfairs  of  men. 

This  subject  requires  that  we  should  not  pass  over  it  with 

a  slight  attention,  inasmuch  as  every  answer  which  can  be 

39 


306 

clearly  given  (o  the  minutest,  as  well  as  the  more  important 
objections  of  unbelievers,  is  shedding  some  light  on  the  cause 
of  divine  truth,  and  giving  additional  stability  to  its  founda- 
tions. 

In  the  first  place,  I  hope  to  demonstrate,  that  the  prohibi- 
tion made  to  the  parents  of  the  human  race,  for  the  probation 
of  their  innocence,  instead  of  being,  in  the  language  of  the 
objection,  of  a  mean  and  trivial  nature,  was  drawn  from  a  sub- 
ject which,  in  that  age,  held  the  highest  place  in  the  econ- 
omy of  human  life. 

In  the  next  place,  I  shall  shew  that,  at  that  time,  a  subject 
on  which  to  rest  this  trial  could  hardly  have  been  taken  from 
a  different  class  of  objects. 

Those  who  affect  to  be  very  wise,  or  very  witty,  are  pleas- 
ed to  say,  with  all  the  contemptuousness  which  the  terms,  in 
the  present  age,  obviously  imply,  that  Moses,  by  his  narra- 
tion, has  suspended  the  destinies  of  the  whole  human  race 
upon  the  eating  of  an  apple.  Let  us  seriously  examine  the 
truth  of  this  sneering  allegation,  and  inquire  into  the  nature 
of  that  act  by  which  Adam  forfeited  his  primitive  condition 
of  happiness  in  Paradise. 

It  is  uncertain  what  was  the  kind  of  this  fruit,  or  the  nature 
of  the  tree  which  bore  it.     It  is  probable  that  it  was  a  tree 


3or 

entirely  singular  in  its  nature,  bearing  a  fruit  of  exquisite 
Leautj  to  the  eye,  antl  of  delightful  fragrance  and  flavour  to 
the  taste  and  smell.  It  received  its  denomination  of  the  tree 
of  knowledge  of  good  and  evil,  only  to  indicate  the  conse- 
quences of  tasting  its  fruit ;  that,  as  the  first  pair  had  hitherto 
known  only  good,  they  would,  by  that  act,  become  practi- 
cally acquainted  with  evil.  But,  in  order  to  a  proper  con- 
sideration of  this  action,  it  is  necessary  to  understand  that  the 
only  sustenance  of  human  life,  in  the  beginning,  was  derived 
from  the  spontaneous  fruits  of  the  garden,  and  its  principal  re- 
freshments from  their  cooling  and  enlivening  juices.  The 
culture  of  grain  was  not  yet  practised,  nor  were  sacrifices,  at 
that  period,  drawn  from  the  fold.  The  virtue  of  temperance 
then,  which  constituted  the  chief  of  the  practical  virtues  of 
that  state,  must  have  had  respect  only  to  the  quantity,  or  the 
kinds  of  the  fruits  which  were  then  permitted,  and  used  for 
nourishment ;  particularly,  as  there  might  have  been,  in  the 
collections  of  that  primitive  garden,  some  species  possessing 
highly  exhilarating  qualities,  requiring  caution  in  their  use.— 
And  it  is  far  from  being  an  improbable  supposition,  that  the 
interdicted  tree  contained  a  liquor  of  intoxicating  strength, 
calculated  to  throw  all  the  fluids  of  the  human  body  into  un- 
natural tumults,  immediately  inciting  to  vice,  and  awaking  im- 
pure and  indecent  passions ;  as  we  learn  from  the  shame 
which  affected  our  great  ancestors,  as  soon  as  the  influence  of 
the  first  draught  had  somewhat  subsided.  And  it  is  no  less 
probable  that  it  possessed  properties  of  a  most  deleterious 


nature,  vliich  infused  into  the  veins  an  insidious  poison,  in- 
ducing that  mortal  tendency  to  corruption  in  the  whole  franae, 
to  which  it  fell  at  length  an  irremediable  victim. 

In  these  reflections  we  may  perceive,  I  presume,  a  founda- 
tion laid  for  making  a  just  estimate  of  the  importance  of  the 
subject  which  was  chosen  as  the  original  test  of  man's  obedi- 
ence. The  fruits  of  the  garden  furnished  the  whole  subsist- 
ence of  human  life.  In  them  were  found  all  the  means  of  tem- 
perate enjoyment ;  and,  in  the  forbidden  tree,  at  least,  we  dis- 
cern what  was  equivalent  to  the  most  pernicious  viands  of  lux- 
ury and  intemperance.  No  subject  could  exist,  at  that  pe- 
riod, of  greater  moment,  for  the  trial  of  man's  integrity  and 
perseverance  in  the  principle  of  all  duly  ;  which  consists,  as 
has  before  been  said,  in  obedience  simply  to  the  will  of  God. 

I  proposed,  in  the  next  place,  to  shew  the  probability  that 
divine  wisdom  could  hardly  have  selected  a  subject  from  a 
different  class  of  objects,  on  which  this  trial  could  have  been 
rested.  It  has  already  been  suggested,  that  any  act  which 
should  have  involved  direct  impiety  of  aim,  or  indicated 
impurity  of  disposition,  would  have  been  so  immediately  re- 
volting to  a  holy  mind,  that  a  temptation  to  the  commission 
of  it,  could  hardly,  for  a  single  moment,  have  entered  the 
mind,  or  been  entertained  there  with  favour.  And,  it  is  ob- 
vious, that  none  of  the  precepts  of  the  decalogue,  could  have 
afforded  any  grounds  for  being  made,  at  this  time,  a  test  of 


309 

this  sublime  duty.  None  of  the  moral  relations  of  social  v 
which  we  now  see  established  among  mankind,  could  Iheji 
have  yielded  any  possible  occasion  to  transgression. — Let  u:- 
examine  them  singly.  Could  man,  for  example,  have  deni- 
ed the  existence  of  God,  or  have  profaned  his  holy  name,  or 
debased  his  nature  by  any  of  the  images  of  idolatry,  who 
daily  held  delightful  commerce  wi(h  him  in  the  gardens  of 
Paradise,  and  whose  works  were  shining  in  all  the  freshness 
of  their  glory  before  his  eyes,  in  the  recent  creation  ?  Could 
the  duty  of  children  to  their  parents  be  violated  by  him  who 
had  no  parent  but  God  ?  How  could  murder,  adultery,  or 
falsehood  in  rendering  testimony  exist,  where  no  subjects 
were  found,  on  which  these  crimes  could  be  practised  ?  Or 
how  should  he  covet,  or  trespass  on  the  property  of  another, 
who  was  already  lord  of  the  whole  creation  ? — It  is  evident, 
from  these  inquiries,  that  none  of  the  moral  precepts  of  the 
law  could  have  been  selected  for  this  peculiar  trial.  It 
must  be  found  only  in  some  object  addressing,,  exclusive- 
ly the  corporeal  appetites,  the  indulgence  of  which,  not  in- 
volving any  transgression  of  the  laws  of  nature,  would  not 
of  course,  awaken  any  suspicion,  or  call  up  any  extraordi 
nary  vigilance,  or  guard  against  the  access  of  temptation ^ 
The  restraint,  of  consequence,  which  this  comjaand  imposed 
upon  Adam,  and  his  watchfulness  against  its  approach,  and 
the  whole  virtue  of  this  act,  was  obedience  simply  to  the  di- 
vine rvill. — The  prohibition,  therefore,  could  aflect  onh 
certain   fruits  of  the  garden.     Within  the   compass  of  thia 


310 

were  included  all  the  objects  R-hich  could  minister  any  temp"- 
fation  to  man's  sensual  appetite?.  From  it  alone  could  be 
drawn  any  trial  of  his  virtue,  in  the  circumstances  in  which 
he  was  placed.  And  among  all  its  fruits,  it  is  manifest  that 
none  was  more  proper  than  that  which  applied  so  strongly  to 
the  principle  of  curiosity  as  well  as  of  tasle,  and  promised, 
at  the  same  time,  to  open  to  their  mistaken  imaginations,  a 
new  and  boundless  field  of  knowledge.  A  new  field  it  was, 
both  various  and  extensive,  to  those  who  had  hitherto  known 
only  good  :  but,  ah !  how  miserable  when  their  fond  fancies 
came  to  be  blasted  by  the  fatal  experiment ! 

Of  these  circumstances,  the  great  enemy  of  God,  and  of  . 
liuman  happiness  made  his  advantage  to  accomplish  his  evil 
designs,  and,  by  insidious  steps,  to  approach  the  innocent 
mind  of  our  first  mother.  Direct  guilt  could  not  touch  her 
imtainted  soul.  The  tempter,  therefore,  artfully  covered 
the  crime  in  the  apparent  indifference  of  the  object ;  and  by 
his  specious,  reasonings,  and  his  dangerous  example,  in  eat- 
ing before  her  eyes  of  the  same  fruit  without  injury,  led  her 
confused  and  conflicting  thoughts  to  the  utmost  verge  of  in- 
iiocence.  At  last,  her  ardent  thirst  of  knowledge,  when  she 
recollected  that  it  was  a  fruit  to  be  desired  to  make  one  wise, 
urged  her,  in  the  tumults  of  her  mind,  to  yield  herself  up  to 
the  wiles  of  the  tempter,  and,  in  an  unhappy  moment,  to  pass 
the  now  imperceptible  limit  between  her  and  vice.  She  was 
wsurprised  by  the  artful  snares  which  bad  been  laid  for  her  ; 


311 

and,  without  being  conscious  of  her  sfate  at  first,  she  fell. — 
Intoxicated  by  the  imaginary  success  of  her  experiment;, 
and,  at  the  same  time  perhaps,  by  the  powerful  juice  of  the 
fruit  which  she  had  just  eaten,  she  brought  a  portion  of  it  io 
her  husband,  and  adding  the  irresistible  force  of  her  persua- 
sions to  the  fascinating  charms  of  her  person,  he  yielded  to 
the  multiplied  temptation,  and  befell  with  her. 

Will  it  be  said  that,  if  this  picture  should  have  any  cre- 
dence attached  to  it,  our  first  parents  appear  to  have  been 
the  victims  of  inadvertence  rather  than  of  guilt ;  their  vigi- 
lance was  surprized,  and  it  would  be  a  hard  measure  in  the 
Creator  to  involve  them  in  such  fatal  consequences  for  the 
inadvertence  of  a  moment  ?  Let  it  be  remembered,  that  no 
inadvertence,  or  surprize  can  form  a  just  apology  for  violat- 
ing the  positive  command  of  God.  Let  us  further  reflect, 
that  it  is  the  certain  and  awful  order  of  the  moral  world,  that 
an  imprudence,  an  intermission  of  our  virtuous  vigilance,  an 
act  of  inconsiderate  folly,  is  often  the  cause  of  irreparable 
calamities.  Perhaps,  men  more  frequently  precipitate  them- 
selves into  ruin,  by  what  may  be  deemed  imprudence,  in 
the  beginning,  than  by  open  crime,  and  hardened  impiety. 

The  great  ancestors  of  our  race,  inexperienced  in  the  wiles 
of  sin,  had  now  arrived  at  the  consummation  of  that  fatal 
act  which  involved  themselves  and  their  whole  race  in  irre- 
trievable perdition.     And,  when  the  delirium,  created  by 


ai2 

that  mortal  juice,  had  subsided,  they  became  conscious,  for 
the  first  time,  that  they  had  forever  lost  the  favour  of  God 
their  Heavenly  Father.  They  dreaded  the  approach  of 
him  whom  ihey  had  so  often  met  with  confidence  and  joy, 
pouring  at  bis  feet  the  gratefdl  homage  of  their  hearts. 
When  thej^  heard  the  accustomed  sign  of  his  drawing  near, 
they  fled  trembling  from  his  presence,  vainly  thinking  to  con- 
ceal themselves  among  the  trees  of  the  garden.  In  the  view 
of  one  another,  as  well  as  before  the  divine  majesty  they 
perceived  that  shame  which  is  the  disgraceful  effect  of  sin, 
and  in  their  confusion,  they  attempted  to  cover  themselves 
with  fig  leaves. — This  remarkable  fact  merits  particular  at- 
tention, as  conveying  a  striking  indication  of  the  moral  state 
of  their  minds,  and  perhaps  also  of  the  phj^sical  influence  of 
the  fruit  which  they  had  eaten. 

The  nakedness  of  their  persons,  which,  in  the  period  of 
their  innocence,  had  never  affected  Ihem  with  any  emotions 
but  such  as  were  pure,  now  began  to  cover  them  with  con- 
scious blushes.  Was  it  that  the  glow  of  beauty,  and,  per- 
haps, of  a  celestial  radiance,  which  surrounded  the  priftii- 
tive  body  of  man,  was  now  lost,  and  the  deformity  of  a  fal- 
len nature  began  to  appear  ?  Or,  was  it  that,  formerly,  the 
sentiments  of  devotion,  of  friendship,  of  a  virtuous  tender- 
ness, of  a  sublime  sympathy,  of  a  high,  noble,  and  intelligi- 
gent  conversation  which  reigned  between  them,  so  occupied 
their  whole  souls  when  together,  that  every  pleasure  of  the 


313 

ssnseg  gave  only  a  gentle  heightening  lo  the  most  pure  and 
refined  feelings  of  the  mind  ;  but  now,  the  tumults  of  a  gross 
passion  alone  filled  their  hearts,  always  shameful,  and,  in 
their  situation,  incapable  of  being  concealed,  or  subjected 
to  the  control  of  reason.  Perhaps  both  these  causes  con- 
curred to  produce  this  singular  incident  in  the  history  of  the 
Fall.  Their  nature  which  had  made  a  near  approach  to  the 
angelic,  was  now  sunk  into  a  near  resemblance  of  the  brutal ; 
and  as  yet  no  Saviour  had  been  announced  to  them,  to  trai- 
quilize  the  tumults  of  their  frame,  or  to  correct  the  violence 
of  their  passions. 

2.    THE  IMPORT  OF  THE  THREATENING. 

I  am,  in  the  next  place,  to  consider  the  full  implication  of 
the  threatening ; — In  Ihe  day  thou  eaiest  thereof  thou  shalt 
surely  die ;  whence  we  may  deduce,  by  the  most  legitimate 
inference,  the  Life  which,  by  contrast  is  involved  in  the  con- 
dition of  obedience. 

This  denunciation  may  justly  be  supposed  to  pronounce 
the  immediate  dissolution  of  the  transgressor.  And  this  is 
the  meaning,  perhaps,  which  most  obviously  obtrudes  itself 
upon  the  mind  of  the  reader.  But  it  may  express,  merely, 
the  sentence  of  the  law,  pronounced  by  the  judge,  in  con- 
sequence of  which  the  criminal  is  considered  as  dead  to  so- 
ciety, and  thenceforth,  held  in  rigorous  custody  till  the  pp- 

10 


314 

liod  of  execution  appointed  by  the  supreme  authority,  arrive; 
If  the  latter  be   the  interpretation   of  this  awful  sentence, 
which  is  supposed  by  the  greater  number  of  divines,  still 
such  a  change  must  have  immediately  passed  upon  the  bo- 
dies of  the  condemned,  that  the  powers  of  immortal  life  be- 
came  instantly  extinguished,  and  the  seeds  of  death  began 
to  work  in  their  living  members.     And  the  corporeal  princi- 
ples, among  which  are  those  powerful  agents,  the  appetites 
aiid  passions,  must,  from  the  intimate  alliance  which  sub- 
sists between  the  diflferent  parts  of  our  nature,  have  extend- 
ed their  taint  through  the  whole  system,  mental  as  well  as 
bodily.     The  terms  of  this  sentence,  therefore,   include  the 
moral  death  of  the  soul,  which,  without  the  provision  of  the 
gospel,  must  adhere  to  it  while  its  being  endures.     In  these 
reflections  we  recognize  the  extent  of  that  death  temporal, 
spiritual,  and  eternal,  which,  according  to  our  standards,  was 
included  in  the  denunciation  on  our  first  parents. 

OF  THE  ORIGINAL  IMMORTALITV  OF   OUR  FIRST    PARENTS* 

The  opinion  of  those  who  would  subject  Adam  to  imme- 
diate death,  in  consequence  of  his  transgression,  I  will  pre- 
sent to  you,  after  having  taken  a  view  of  his  representative 
character.  In  the  mean  time,  it  is  obvious  to  remark,  that 
this  denunciation  must  imply  that,  in  a  contrary  event,  man 
would  have  existed  forever  in  a  state  of  holiness  and  happi- 
ness, nor  have  been  liable  to  the  corruptions  of  a  mortal  bo- 


315 

dy,  and  the  pains  of  dissolution.  A  question  has  arisen,  in 
consequence,  among  divines ;  whether  man  would  have  con- 
tinued his  immortal  being  upon  the  earth,  or  have  been  trans- 
lated, without  pain,  and,  perhaps,  with  some  high  improve- 
ment of  his  nature,  (o  a  superior  state  of  existence  ?  But,  93 
God  has  not  been  pleased  lo  make  any  revelation  of  his  will 
upon  this  subject,  the  inquiry  would  be  fruitless;  and,  to 
propose  any  conjectures  concerning  it  would  indicate  an  un- 
licensed boldness  of  fancy,  equally  arrogant  and  vain.  The 
enemies  of  revelation,  indeed,  have  denied  the  possibility  of 
the  fact,  that  man  should  be  immortal.  The  human  consti- 
tution is  said  necessarily  to  tend  to  decay.  The  nerves  by 
their  very  structure,  although  no  disease  should  attack  them, 
become  rigid  by  age,  and  lose  that  elasticity  which  is  requi- 
site to  carry  on  the  functions  of  animal  life. — This  is  judg- 
ing of  man  before  the  fall,  by  the  ruins  of  his  nature  since 
that  fatal  event.  There  are  diflferent  species  of  organized 
matter,  which  seem  calculated  to  endure  forever,  if  not  at- 
tacked by  extraneous  violence ;  to  instance  only  in  the  dia- 
mond;— And  why  might  not  the  substance  of  the  human 
frame  have  been  so  modified  as  to  be  fitted  for  eternal  dura- 
tion, or  that  its  changes  should  lead  only  to  still  increasing 
perfection?  Some  great  and  essential  change  has  evidently 
taken  place,  not  only  in  man,  but  in  all  animals,  and  in  the 
whole  system  of  nature,  intended, to  demonstrate  the  dis- 
pleasure of  Almighty  God  at  that  sin  which  has  spread  \U 
baleful  effects  over  the  entire  face  of  the  world.     The  beastji 


316 

wliicb  at  first,  only  innocently  cropped  the  green  herbage, 
became,  in  raanj  cases,  the  devourers  of  one  aiiother. 
And  the  soil,  which,  in  the  beginning  was  fertile  and  beauti- 
ful, and  yielded  a  copious  harvest  of  fruits  to  an  easy  and 
delightful  culture,  became  sterile  and  deformed,  and  hardly 
afforded  a  scanty  subsistence  to  the  sweat  and  labour  of  itn 
guilty  possessor. 

OF    THE    REPRESENTATIVE    CHARACTER    OF    ADAM. 

Upon  this  history  a  natural,  and  important  inquiry  arises, 
whether  the  trial  imposed  upon  Adam,  respected  his  own 
Stability  in  this  holy  state  exclusively,  according  to  the  opin- 
ion of  some  writers,  or  whether,  according  to  the  better 
opinion  of  the  great  majority  of  christians,  his  posterity  were 
involved  with  him  in  its  consequences ;  and  whether  we  do 
not  see,  in  his  defection,  the  true  source,  not  only  of  the 
mortality,  but  of  all  the  calamities  which  have  overwhelmed 
human  nature?  On  this  subject  the  sacred  scriptures  in- 
struct us  in  the  most  explicit  terms.  "In  Adam  all  die. 
By  one  man,  sin  entered  into  the  world,  and  death  by  sin ; 
so  dp.ith  passed  upon  all  men,  for  that  all  have  sinned."  In 
this  last  expression  there  seems  to  be  a  small  inaccuracy  in 
the  translation,  which  is  calculated  to  lead  the  incautious 
reader  mlo  the  opinion  that  death  is  the  penal  consequence  of 
the  individual  act  of  every  sinner  ;  thereby  transferring  the 
cause  of  our  mortality,  contrary  to  the  doctrine  of  the  scrip- 


sir 

tures,  from  the  crime  of  the  Covenant-Head  of  the  race  to 
each  man's  personal  transgression.  The  immediate  and 
proxioiate  canse  of  this  fatal  and  universal  catastrophe  to 
Adaw,  and  all  his  descendants,  was  the  depravation  of  Lie 
nature,  by  the  first  act  of  sin,  thereby  impairing,  and  tend- 
ing finally  to  destroy  all  the  principles  of  life.  This  order 
of  things  is  essentially  connected  with  the  established,  and 
imniuJable  laws  of  the  universe,  in  consequence  of  which  a 
depraved  and  perishing  offspring  necessarily  springs  from  a 
corrupted  stock.  The  version  of  this  passage,  therefore, 
would  be  better  amended, — "  so  death  passed  upon  all  men, 
because  that  all  in  him  have  become  subject  to  the  effects  of 
Lis  sin  ;"  that  is,  to  that  depravation  of  nature  which  renders 
them  liable  to  death,  and  utterly  incapable  of  eternal  life ; 
except  through  the  Second  Adam,  who,  by  his  death,  Lag 
opened  to  the  transgressor  the  way  for  repentance,  and  the 
obedience  of  a  New-Covenant. 

OF  THE  JUSTICE  OF  THIS  INSTITUTIOPT- 

If  the  enemies  of  our  holy  religion  demand  the  justice  of 
this  order  which  subjects  a  rational,  and  moral  being  to  an 
hereditary  depravity  ?  I  answer,  that  this  is  not  an  objection 
which  peculiarly  affects  revelation.  It  is  a  diflSculty  equal- 
ly in  the  religion  of  nature,  and  the  philosophy  of  the  uni- 
verse. We  cannot  be  fairly  required  to  explain  the  secret 
operations  of  the  laws  of  nature,  which  are  known  only  to 


318 

God,  and  to  account  for  their  wisdom,  and  their  equity- 
Thus  far  the  fact  is  open  to  our  inspection  ;  that  man,  who 
has  become  mortal,  can  transmit  only  a  mortal  constitution 
to  his  offspring.  By  the  same  laws,  if  his  appetites,  and 
passions  have  become  disordered  by  sin,  the  same  tenden- 
cies exhibit  themselves  in  all  those  who  spring  from  his  loins. 
The  corporeal  temperament  of  the  parent,  and,  frequently, 
the  faculties  of  his  mind,  we  see  renewed  in  his  posterity. 
It  is  in  vain  to  remonstrate  against  the  injustice  of  this  order. 
The  fact  exists.  And  shall  not  the  Judge  of  all  the  earth 
do  right  ?  In  reasoning  from  facts  we  must  confess  that  the 
corruption  of  human  nature  must  infallibly  grow  out  of  the 
established  laws  for  the  propagation  of  animal  existence. 
No  impeachruent,  therefore,  can  justly  be  moved  against  the 
holy  scriptures  which,  having  exhibited  the  transaclion  with 
our  primitive  parent  under  the  form  of  a  covenant,  have  plac- 
ed him  at  the  head  of  his  race,  as  their  natural  and  moral 
representative.  For,  according  to  this  eternal  constitution , 
conformably  with  his  virtue,  or  his  vice,  that  is,  his  standings 
or  his  fall,  must  have  been  the  consequences  on  his  posteri^ 
iy.  "  By  one  man  sin  entered  into  the  world,  and  death 
by  sin ;  so  death  passed  upon  all  men,  because  in  him  ali 
have  sinned,"  and  become  subject  to  his  depraved,  and  mor- 
tal nature. 


819 


OF    THE    IJENIGNITT    OF   THIS    ORDINANCE. 

Those  who  are  unfriendly  to  our  doctrine  demand,  where 
would  be  the  benignity  of  the  Creator,  in  calling  into  exis- 
tence a  whole  race  of  beings,  and,  at  the  same  time,  sub- 
jecting their  eternal  destiny  to  the  voluntary  act  of  a  frail, 
though  innocent  creature?  And  an  appearance  of  severity 
it  certainly  would  have,  if  it  had  not  been  his  most  merciful 
purpose,  annulling  the  condition  of  the  first  covenant,  now 
rendered  impracticable  by  the  Fall,  to  dispose  the  humbled 
and  lost  father  of  the  race,  and  his  whole  oflfepring,  immedi- 
ately under  the  protection  and  grace  of  the  Second  Adam, 
and  the  blessings  of  a  new  covenant,  established  on  better 
promises,  enriched  with  more  glorious  hopes,  and  resting  on 
a  more  perfect  security  in  the  righteousness  of  Christ.  And 
it  is  not  an  improbable  opinion  of  many  wise  and  good  men, 
that  the  condition  of  the  human  family,  under  this  dispensa- 
tion, is  much  to  be  preferred  to  that  which  would  have  ex- 
isted under  the  most  favourable  operation  of  the  first.  The 
displays  of  the  divine  nature  have  been  more  glorious,  the 
riches  and  consolations  of  the  divine  mercy  have  been  more 
precious,  the  joys  of  eternal  life  more  exalted,  and  trium- 
phant. Yet,  to  this  illustrious  exhibition  of  divine  grace 
the  fall  of  human  nature,  in  the  unsearchab!'^  >  -sdom  of  God, 
became  the  necessary  introduction.  Its  richest  glory  arises 
out  of  its  deepest  humiliation. 


OF  THE  Ol'INION  THAT  DEATH  WAS  DENOUNCE©  TO  TAKE 
PLACE  ON  THE  DAY  OF  THE  FALL. 

Another  interpretation  of  this  awful  sanction, — In  the  day 
thou  eatest  thereof  thou  shall  surely  die,  which  is  more  lite- 
ral than  the  former,  and  which  limits  the  execution  of  the  sen- 
tence to  the  day  of  the  transgression,  merits  our  particular 
consideration,  at  once,  from  its  simplicity,  and  its  obvious 
conformity  to  the  letter  of  the  law.  On  this  interpretation, 
Adam,  under  his  original  covenant,  could  not  possibly  have 
had  posterity.  Nor  is  it  probable  that,  if  he  had  been  per- 
mitted to  live  for  a  season,  he  could,^  without  a  new  covenant^ 
giving  him  the  hope  of  life,  have  had  any  offspring,  while 
precariously  existing  under  the  momentary,  and  overwhelm- 
ing apprehensions  of  death.  But  the  whole  scene  was  chang- 
ed by  the  promise  of  a  Saviour,  in  these  mysterious  words, 
the  seed  of  the  woman  shall  bruise  the  serpent's  head,  which 
hold  out  to  our  afflicted  father  the  final  destruction  of  the 
power  of  evil,  and  offer  to  his  hopes  the  most  illustrious  dis- 
plays of  divine  mercy  and  grace.  Immediately  we  perceive 
the  first  fruits  of  this  gracious  promise  upon  our  first  pa- 
rents; and  Adam,  in  the  hope  of  a  numerous  progeny, 
which  was  extinguished  with  the  loss  of  his  own  existence, 
-called  the  name  of  his  wife,  in  the  moment  of  his  exulta- 
tion, Evcy  in  the  Hebrew  language,  Chavah ;  because 
now  he  was  assured  that  she  was  to  become  the  mother  of 


321 

a  livings  race. — Though  raised  to  better  hopes,  yet  pos- 
sessing only  a  depraved  and  fallen  nature,  he  could  im- 
part no  other  to  bi;3  oflTspring.  All,  therefore,  are  born  under 
sin.  But  inasmuch  as,  without  a  IMediator,  and  a  new  cove- 
nant, none  would  have  received  existence,  all  who  now  are 
permitted  to  come  into  the  world,  enter  it  under  the  protec- 
tion of  this  glorious  Saviour  ;  and,  accordingly  we  see  them 
in  the  seals  of  this  gracious  covenant,  in  the  church,  met 
with  the  offered  blessings  of  the  righteousness  of  faith  .^ 
Hence  life  and  immortality  are  proposed  to  alL  not,  as  un- 
der the  original  covenant  with  Adam,  to  perfect  obedience  ; 
but,  through  a  Mediator,  to  sincere  repentance,  and  evange- 
lic obedience. 

OF  THE  IMPORT  OF  THE  TREE  OF  KNOWLEDGE,  AND 
THE  TREE  OF  LIFE. 

The  last  inquiry,  proposed  under  this  head,  was  to  ascer- 
tain the  purpose  and  meaning  of  the  tree  of  the  knowledge 
of  good  and  evil,  and  the  tree  of  life.  Of  the  former,  little 
question  can  exist.  The  fruit  of  that  tree  was  designed  to 
form  the  teat  of  the  obedience  of  man.  And  its  denomination 
was  manifestly  derived  from  its  destination :  for,  Adam,  who, 
at  first,  had  been  acquainted  only  with  goody  became,  from 
tasting  its  fruit,  most  fatally  sensible  of  evil.     The  act  in- 


Sec  this  principk  more  explicitly  statPtl  under  the  article  of  baptism. 
41 


322 

troduced  into  his  soul  the  afflicting  consciousness  ot  guiit, 
and  the  fatal  daring  of  disobedience,  once  become  familiar, 
perverted  all  his  powers,  and  emboldened  his  sinful  passions 
to  farther  transgressions.  It  threw  the  principles  of  duty 
headlong  from  their  throne,  and  raised  to  the  forsaken  seat, 
all  the  irregular  affections,  and  violent  impulses  of  a  deprav- 
ed nature.  This  moral  death  of  the  soul  was,  at  the  same 
time,  conjoined  with  the  decay  of  all  the  powers  of  the  bo- 
dy, and  the  corruption  of  the  principles  of  animal  life.  On 
the  other  hand,  it  is  by  no  means  an  improbable  conjecture, 
that  the  tree  of  life  possessed  a  health  giving,  and  renovating 
quality,  which  added  a  vital  stimulus  to  the  corporeal  powers  ; 
but  that  the  forbidden  fruit,  besides  its  intoxicating  power, 
which  has  before  been  suggested,  contained,  likewise,  a  dele- 
terious spirit  which  instantly  diffused  a  slow  consuming  poison 
through  all  the  veins,  and  introduced  the  principles  of  disease 
and  death  into  the  human  frame. 

Many  respectable  writers  have  believed  that  this  life  giv- 
ing tree  was  placed  in  the  garden  as  the  symbol  of  immor- 
tality to  this  innocent  pair,  as  long  as  they  should  persevere 
in  their  duty ;  and  probably  a  sacramental  sign  of  the  stead- 
fastness of  the  covepant,  to  be  ever  before  their  eyes,  to  en- 
courage their  joyful  hopes,  and  to  awaken  their  ardent  de- 
votion. 


323 


OF  THE  INTRODUCTION    OF  SIN    INTO  THE  WORKS  OF    »0D. 

Before  I  proceed  to  treat  of  the  consequences  of  the  Fall, 
either  upon  the  parents,  or  the  entire  family  of  the  human 
race,  it  will  not,  I  hope,  be  deemed  improper  to  introduce 
a  speculative  question  which,  has  been  found  to  occupy 
with  much  solicitude,  the  minds  of  men ;  and  is  often,  by 
the  enemies  of  revelation,  made  the  occasion  of  casting  re- 
proach upon  its  doctrines.  I  introduce  it,  however,  not  with 
the  presumption  of  being  able  satisfactorily  to  resolve  to  the 
minds  of  all,  the  difficulties  with  which  it  is  embarrassed  ; 
but  with  the  humbler  hope  of  inducing  unmurmuring  sub- 
mission to  the  will  of  God,  whose  decrees  transcend  the  in- 
vestigations of  reason. — Why  did  the  fnfinite  Creator,  whose 
power  and  wisdom,  can  accomplish  all  his  will,  without  en- 
croaching on  the  peculiar  prerogatives  of  human  nature,  per- 
mit the  introduction  of  sin  into  his  works  ?  Why  should 
moral  and  natural  evil  form  a  part  of  the  system,  conceived 
by  the  Infinite  Mind,  for  the  administration  of  this  world? 
Or  how  could  sin  exist  in  the  universe,  in  which  we  confess 
that  all  things  depend  solely  upon  his  will,  without  imputing 
to  him  such  an  agency  in  the  event  as  to  palliate,  at  least,  if 
not  entirely  excuse  the  transgression  of  the  sinner  ? — It  is 
doubtless  gross  impiety  to  ascribe  iniquity  to  God,  as  its  au- 
thor, or  to  impute  any  indirect  influence  over  the  hr.man 
mind  to  the  Most  Holy,  inconsistent  with  the  purity  of  his 


3U 

nature.  For,  througiioiit  the  holy  scriptures,  his  extreme 
abhorrence  of  sin,  and  his  inflexible  detennination  to  punish 
it,  is  expressed  in  the  strongest  terms ;  but  candour  must 
compel  every  wise  man  to  confess  the  difficulty  of  account- 
ing for  its  permission  ;  and  above  all,  for  its  entering  for  so 
Iar;!;e  a  portion  into  the  plans  of  the  Sovereign  Wisdom. 

-Some  writers  maintain  the  principle,  that  the  existence  of 
sin  is  a  necessary  consequence  of  the  freedom  of  action.  The 
Principle  is  at  least  incautiously  expressed.  No  inevitable 
connexion  surely  exists  between  liberty  smd  criminality  ^ 
otherwise,  our  freedom  would  be  a  pernicious  gift.: — It  would 
be  a  more  certain  proposition,  but  would  contribute  httle  to^ 
satisfy  the  inquisitive^  mind,  that  the  possibility  of  crime 
must  be  connected  wi|h  perfect  freedom  of  vohtion  and  ac- 
tion :  it  is  not,  therefore,  surprising  that,  in  any  one  instance 
'i'  '  :>'> 

the  possibility  should  be  converted  into  fact.     A  solution 

this  which  is  abundantly  sufficient  to  those  who  deny  the 
decrees  of  God  ;  but  to  those  who  believe  that  the  decrees 
extend  to  every  part  of  nature,  and  embrace  the  minutest 
actions  of  the  mind,  silence  and  submission  is  the  truest 
wisdom. 


OP  THE  OPINION  OF  LEIBNITZ. 

Some   German   metaphysicians,  especially  the  disciples  of 
the,  school  of  Leibnitz,  have  adopted  a  theory  peculiar  to 


325 

themselves ;  that  evil  is  necessary  to  the  perfection  of  the 
universe;  as  necessary,  to  use  their  pwn  similitude,  as 
shades  to  the  beauty  of  a  picture.  This  fine  maxim  of  the 
imagination,  is  certainly  dependent  on  a  theory  of  very  que8. 
tionable  truth ;  or  rather  is  contradicted  by  the  soundest  dic- 
tates of  .Reason. — Their  great  dozipa,  which  solves  to  them 
all  diiScultieSj'in  physics,,  and  in  morals,  is,  that  all  the  good 
which  can  possibly  exist  in  the  universe,  and  the  whole  per- 
fection, in  both  orders  of  being,  which  can  possibly  proceed 
from  the  wisdom  and  the  power  of  the  Omnipotent  is  to  be 
seen  in  his  works.  What  does  not  exist  is  impossible. — > 
This  principle  is  bringing  back  the  absurd  Fate  of  the  Sto- 
ics, and  subjecting  the  Deity  himself  to  the  chains  of  ne- 
cessity.— I  must  be  permitted  to  observe  on  this  whole  ques- 
tion, that  it  presents  to  our  reason  one  of  those  inscrutable 
subjects,  on  which  it  is  wise,  in  the  present  state,  to  repose 
submissively  on  the  wisdom  of  God;  resolving  what  we  can- 
not explain,  into  Jiis  sovereign  will,  and  the  unsearchable 
counsels  of  his  understanding.  Revelation,  however,  in- 
forms us  that  he  will  turn  this  disastrous  event  to  subserve 
the  noblest  ends  in  the  universe, — -the  illustration  of  his  good- 
ness, his  mercy,  and  his  justice,  in  the  exaltation  of  his  Son, 
so  as  to  render  the  new  creation  more  glorious  than  Eden. 


326^ 


OF  THE  SERPENT  AND  THE  TEMPTATION. 

Of  the  duration  of  the  state  of  innocence,  no  facts  are  pre- 
sented to  us  from  which  any  certain  estimate  can  be  formed. 
Nor  have  we  anj  means  of  judging  in  what  manner  the  temp- 
tation was  addressed  by  the  serpent,  to  our  primitive  mother. 
Many  frivolous  fancies  have  been  uttered  concerning  the 
species  of  serpent,  whose  form  the  tempter  assumed  ;  all  of 
them,  probably,  without  sufficiently  adverting  to  the  effects 
of  the  curse  on  the  whole  creation,  and  on  the  change,  par- 
ticularly, which  must  have  passed  on  the  forms  and  qualities 
of  the  animal  tribes. 

That  the  whole  history  of  this  most  important  of  human 
transactions,  is  according  to  the  opinion  of  some  respectable 
writers,  a  mere  allegorical  fable,  depicting  in  figure  this  truth, 
that  the  fascinations  of  vice  deceived  and  seduced  our  first 
parents,  appears  to  have  no  support  in  the  language  in  which 
the  narration  is  conveyed  to  us.  The  images  of  hieroglyphic, 
out  of  which  this  divine  fable  is  supposed  to  be  constructed, 
could  originally  have  been  drawn  only  from  actual  types, 
that  is,  from  historical  facts.  And  the  serpentine  hiero- 
glyphic of  eloquence,  wit,  and  cunning,  used  at  first,  by  the 
Egyptian  priests,  and  supposed  to  be  here  employed,  has 
every  appearance  of  being  itself  borrowed  from  the  fact  which 
took  place  in  Paradise.     From  the  same  fact,  the  prince  of 


327 

evil  spirits,  has  received,  in  the  holy  scriptures,  his  figura. 
live  denomination  of  the  Old  Serpent  ;  and,  among  the  hea- 
then, the  emblematic  wand  of  Mercury  seems  to  have  had  a 
similar  origin.  The  denunciation  pronounced  upon  that  rep- 
tile, upon  thy  belly  shalt  thou  go,  and  dust  shalt  thou  eat, 
has,  obviously,  a  reference  to  some  transmutation  passed  up« 
on  his  form,  and  his  manner  of  moving  and  subsistence,  de- 
signed by  God  to  be  emblematic  of  the  humiliation,  and  the 
degraded  state  into  which  his  arts  had  reduced  the  parents, 
and  the  whole  race  of  man. 

FRAGMENTS  OP  THIS  HISTORY    FOUND   IN  THE  TRADITIONS 
AND  FABLES  OP  ALL  THE  EARLIEST  NA- 
TIONS OF  ANTIQUITY. 

It  is  an  inquiry  which  will  naturally  suggest  itself  both  to 
the  friends,  and  the  enemies  of  revelation — have  any  vestiges 
of  a  fact  so  unspeakably  important  to  human  kind,  been 
found  among  the  historical  or  mythological  monuments  of  the 
most  ancient  pagan  nations  ?  If  true,  would  not  some  tradi- 
tion of  it  have  naturally  been  preserved  in  the  fables  of  every 
people  so  lately  descended  from  the  common  head  of  the 
race  ?  And  several  eminent  and  learned  writers  have  be- 
stowed no  small  pains  in  comparing  the  traditions  and  my- 
thological fables  of  antiquity  with  the  mosaic  history,  whence 
they  have  been  thought  to  have  derived  a  testimony  of  no 
inconsiderable  authority  to  the  authenticity  and  truth  of  the 


328 

sacred  record.  All  who  are  in  the  least  conversant  with  an- 
cient learning,  are  familiar  with  the  fables  of  the  golxien  and 
the  iron  age,  which  are  nothinj^  raore  than  the  allegorical  dress 
in  which  the  poets  have  chosen  to  clothe  the  earliest  history 
of  mankind.  The  doctrine  of  the  primitive  innocence,  and 
fall  of  man,  the  travellers,  and  philosophers  of  Greece,  receiv- 
ed from  Egypt,  and  the  East,  along  with  their  arts  and  scien- 
ces almost  with  the  first  existence  of  the  nation.  In  the 
Egyptian  mythology,  particularly,  we  recognize  the  original 
innocence  of  man  in  the  happy  reign  of  Osiris  over  the 
world.  His  fall  is  depicted  in  the  ravages  of  Typhon,  their 
great  and  wicked  Demon,  or  principle  of  Evil.  And,  last- 
ly, we  discover  the  promise  of  a  Saviour,  in  the  prediction 
of  the  resurrection  and  eternal  life  of  Osiris,  when  he  will 
triumph  over  the  power  of  evil,  and  restore  universal  peace 
and  happiness  to  the  world.^^ 

The  Magians  of  Persia  believed  in  their  enigmatical  sys- 
tem of  the  egg  of  the  world,  which,  at  first,  was  shining  and 
transparent,  till  broken  by  Ahriman,  the  Power  of  Evil, 
when  happiness  became  every  where  confounded  with  mise- 
ry. I  have  formerly  spoken  of  the  doctrine  of  the  ancient 
Bramins  of  India,  and  its  striking  similarity,  in  this  particular, 
to  the  history  of  Moses.  I  have  there  also  referred  to  the 
representations  of  the  catholic  missionaries,  so  long  resident 

*  The  travels  of  Cyrus,  by  the  Chevalier  Ramsay. 


8^9 

in  the  empire  of  China.*  And  it  merits  particular  observa- 
tion, that  the  traditions  of  the  most  ancient  nations,  the  high- 
er they  go  up  towards  the  origin  of  time,  bear  the  stronger 
resemblance  to  the  facia  of  the  sacred  history.  Nor  ought 
this  to  appear  surprising,  since  all  nations,  as  the  scriptures 
assure  us,  have  sprung  from  one  common  parent  after  the 
deluge.  The  nearer,  therefore,  they  carry  their  history  to 
its  source,  the  more  ought  we  to  expect,  what  we  actually 
find,  some  coincidence  in  its  facts  with  those  recorded  in 
Moses.  And  those  holy  writings  evidently  lead  us  to  the 
genuine  fountain  whence  all  their  mythological  streams 
have  flowed,  more  or  less  pure  or  adulterated,  in  proportion 
as  they  approach,  or  recede  from,  the  beginning  of  time. 
And  so  many  striking,  and  undesigned  resemblances  afford  a 
testimony  of  no  slight  value  to  the  authenticity  of  the  divine 
Listojiian. 

THE  IMMEDIATE  EFFECT  OF    THE  FALL  ON  OUR  FIRST 
PARENTS. 

Before  concluding  this  article,  it  will  be  requisite  to  con- 
sider the  immediate  effects  of  the  Fall  upon  our  first  parents, 
as  well  as  its  consequent  influence  upon  their  whole  posteri- 
ty.    On  the  former,  it  is  manifest,  from  the  testimony  of  the 


'  On  the  evidences  of  religion.     The  coincldetices  of  the  IraditiOTlt!  of  fUfl  aa- 
cicnt  nations  ^vith  the  sacred  history. 

42 


380 

holy  scilptures,  ihdt  the  judgments  of  God  became  almost 
iustantaneously  visible.  They  lost  the  image  of  God  in 
which  they  had  been  created. — In  their  persons  they  suffer- 
ed a  lamentable  change,  by  which  their  native  beauty  was 
deformed  ;  and  their  nature,  which  had  been  constituted  im- 
mortal, became  liable  to  pain,  disease,  and  the  gradual  ap- 
proaches of  death.  They  were  condemned  to  leave  the  gar- 
den of  their  original  pleasures,  in  which  they  had  so  happi- 
ly lived  on  the  spontaneous  fruits  of  the  soil,  and  to  labour 
in  the  earth  rendered  hard  and  sterile  by  the  curse. — For  the 
first  time,  they  perceived  the  fears,  and  compunctions  of  a 
guilty  conscience  ;  and,  instead  of  the  pure  and  tranquil  de^ 
lights  of  virtue  and  piety,  they  became  sensible  only  of  the 
turbulence  of  sinful  passions.  One  example  of  these  pre- 
sents to  us  a  picture  of  some  singularity.  "  The  eyes  of 
them  both,*'  it  is  said,  "  were  opened,  and  they  kne  w  that 
they  were  naked;  and  they  sewed  fig  leaves  together,  and 
made  themselves  aprons."  From  these  facts  it  appears-i  that 
they  were  then  first  sensible  of  that  shame  which  naturally 
arises  in  the  mind  conscious  of  improper  and  corrupt  eaio- 
tions,  in  viewing  the  nakedness  of  the  person.  Perhaps  i  n 
the  change  which  passed  upon  them,  they  perceived  a  de- 
formity  in  their  bodies  which  before  had  never  struck  their 
eyes,  which  probably,  in  their  original  condition,  had  not  ex- 
isted. Bat  this  sudden  and  mortifying  sentiment  of  shame, 
as  I  have  before  suggested,  may  have  taken  its  origin  chiefly 
from  their  beina;  then  first  conscious  of  the  emotions  of  Imt 


.^. 


331 

aLiid  being  in  such  a  state,  that  they  could  not,  at  all  time?; 
conceal  the  disgraceful  effect,  except  by  such  an  artifice  as 
that  to  which  they  now  had  recourse.  The  sense  of  shame, 
in  consequence  of  lustful  emotion,  where  it  is  not  utterly  ex- 
tinguished by  the  violence  of  desire,  or  the  force  of  deprav- 
ed habit,  involuntarily  arises  at  all  the  visible  indications  of 
this  gross  passion,  and  at  every  object,  exciting  to  it,  pre- 
sented to  the  senses,  or  the  fancy.  And  in  this,  as  in  other 
subjects,  we  recognise  the  force  of  nature  in  the  new  fallen 
.  pair. 

OF  THE  REPENTANCE  OF  OUR  FIRST  PAREIfTfi. 

Of  the  repentance  of  this  unhappy  pair  after  their  lamen- 
table fall,  nothing  is  distinctly  transmitted  to  us  in  the  con- 
cise narration  of  Moses.  Bat  there  is  the  strongest  reason 
to  presume  that  their  penitence  followed  the  promise  given 
by  God  to  console  them  in  their  affliction  ;  that  the  seed  of 
the  woman  should  bruise  the  serpent^ s  headj  and  thus  destroy 
the  Power  of  Evil ;  delivering  her  offspring  by  this  act, 
from  the  dominion  of  sin,  and  death.  And,  in  the  highest 
degree  probable  it  is,  that  the  God,  and  Father  of  our 
Lord  Jesus  Christ,  who,  in  the  midst  of  his  righteous  judg- 
ments on  their  transgression,  still  bestowed  on  them  the  most 
gracious  and  paternal  care,  in  his  provisions  for  their  tempo- 
ral comfort,  and  who,  in  their  humbled  state,  still  deigned 
to  them  his  heavenly  communication  in  the  field,  or  at  the 


332 

altar,  would  uot  be  deaf  to  the  cries  of  their  misery,  and 
their  penitential  sorrows. 

Hardly,  however,  do  these  gloomy  writers,  who  have  dar- 
ed to  presume  that  these  afflicted  parents,  in  the  midst  of 
the  wreck,  and  the  rescue  of  their  race,  themselves  perish- 
ed without  the  mercy  of  that  Saviour  who  had  been  recent- 
ly promised  to  them,  merit  even  this  notice  of  an  uncharita- 
ble opinion,  which  is  not  supported  by  any  authority  from 
the  holy  scriptures. 

OF  THE  EFFECTS  OF  THE  FALL  ON  THE  WHOLE 
POSTERITY  OF  ADAM. 

The  plain  and  explicit  testimony  of  the  sacred  writings 
teaches,  that  the  state  of  sinfulness  and  misery,  in  which  it 
is  visible  that  human  nature  exists,  is  at  once  the  fruit,  and 
the  punishment  of  the  transgression  of  the  great  head,  and 
representative  of  the  human  family.  No  testimony  can  be 
more  clear  and  decisive  on  the  subject  than  the  declaration 
of  the  apostle  Paul  in  his  epistle  to  the  Romans. — "  By  one 
man,  sin  entered  into  the  world  ;  and  death  by  sin,  so  death 
passed  upon  all  men,  inasmuch  as  all  in  him  have  partaken 
of  the  same  depraved  and  sinful  nature."  The  principal 
evil,  and  the  source  of  all  the  other  evils  which  result  io 
mankind  from  the  original  transgression  of  our  father  is,  not 
only  the  tendency  of  our  bodies  to  decay,  but  the  "  moral 


333 

corruption  with  which  all  men  are  now  born  into  the  world." 
— The  existence  of  a  depraved  nature  in  man  has  been  made 
the  subject  of  ardent,  and  too  often  acrimonious  controver- 
sies in  the  christian  church.  The  Socinians  and  even  the 
Arminians,  probably  mistaking  the  true  meaning  and  extent 
of  the  proposition  which  asserts  the  original  sinfulness  and 
depravity  of  human  nature,  deny  that  we  inherit  from  Adara 
any  evil  except  that  of  pain  and  death.  These  writers,  in- 
deed, confess  the  tendency  of  mankind  to  mnrnl  wrong  in 
many  of  their  earliest  acts.  Yet,  they  refuse  to  admit  the 
federal,  or  representative  character  of  our  primitive  parent 
in  the  covenant  of  works.  But  all  the  orthodox  symbols 
and  confessions,  from  the  first  ages,  maintain  that  **  the  co- 
venant was  made  with  him,  not  only  for  himself,  but  for  all 
his  posterity,  who,  consequenllv,  sinned  in  him,  and  fell 
with  him  in  his  first  transgression."*  I  must  remark  here, 
that  those  who  believe  that  the  penalty  of  the  covenant  was 
ordained  to  be  inflicted  on  the  day  of  the  Fall,  must  use  a 
language  somewhat  different,  but  the  consequence  becomes 
eventually  the  same,  the  inheritance  by  his  offspring,  after 
the  promise,  of  a  constitution  corrupted  by  the  principles  of 
death  and  sin.  For  this,  as  we  have  before  seen,  is  an  uni- 
versal law  of  nature  affecting  the  descent  of  posterity  ; — the 
8cion  must  partake  of  the  stock. 


*  Every  thing  deserving  attention  on  this  subject,  will  be  found  in  President 
Edwards  on  Original  Sin,  and  his  antagonist  Dr.  Taylor. 


Jk   ■*-  "'ii 


a34 

To  mea  who  have  wot  a  favourite  theory  lo  support,  de- 
rived from  an  erring  reason,  rather  than  the  word  of  God, 
the  holy  scriptures  teach,  in  the  most  unequivocal  language, 
the  doctrine  of  original  sin ;  that  is,  that,  by  derivation 
from  an  unholy  original,  we  are  born  prone  to  sin,  and  ali- 
enated from  the  "  life  of  God,  through  the  ignorance  that  is 
in  us,  because  of  the  blindness  of  our  hearts."  "  Behold,  I 
was  shapen  in  iniquity,"  saith  the  psalmist,  "  and  in  sin  did 
my  mother  conceive  me."  "  That  which  is  born  of  the  flesh," 
saith  our  Saviour,  "  is  flesh.  Marvel  not  that  I  said  unto 
you,  you  must  be  born  again."  And  the  apostle,  in  the 
strongest  terms,  declares, — "  The  carnal  mind  is  enmity 
against  God,  it  is  not  subject  to  the  law  of  God,  neither,  in- 
deed, can  be."  But  the  scriptures  arc  replete  with  testimo- 
nies to  the  same  efiect,  which,  to  those  who  habitually,  and 
devoutly  read  them,  it  would  be  superfluous  to  recite. 

THE  GOSPEL  UNITED    WITH  THE  LAW,  IN  THE  MOMENT 
OF  THE  FALL. 

Here  we  may  contemplate  for  a  moment,  the  benignity  of 
the  gospel,  grafted  upon  the  severity  of  the  law,  in  the  first 
moments  of  the  calamity  of  our  great  ancestors,  and  its  un- 
speakable mercy  consoling  them,  and  covering  to  them,  and 
their  posterity,  the  evils  of  the  Fall.  By  our  union  with 
our  natural  head  and  representative,  we  inherit  tbe  depravity 
of  his  nature,  both  in  body  and  in  mind :  but  the  Saviour  be- 


335 

ing  revealed  to  Adam,  he,  with  his  whole  race  were,  at  that 
instant,  placed  under  the  dispensation  of  mediatorial  grace. 
And  now,  every  infant  is  introduced  into  being,  not  on  the 
terms  which  our  degenerate  father  had  forfeited,  of  hfe  to  the 
perfect ;  but  of  pardon  and  grace  to  the  penitent,  bestowed 
though  the  Mediator.  And,  inasmuch  as  (he  most  merciful 
Redeemer,  immediately,  on  the  promise  being  made  to 
Adam,  took  the  world  under  his  protection  and  government, 
the  gracious  aids  of  his  Holy  Spirit,  are  now  in  various  de- 
grees, extended  to  all  men  ;  but  more  especially  to  his  chosen 
people  of  old,  and  since  to  his  church,  under  both  which  dis- 
pensations, the  precious  seal  of  his  covenant  is  appointed  to 
be  administered  to  all  their  infant  seed,  to  assure  tbora  of 
this  great  salvation,  promised  through  the  atonement  of  the 
ever  blessed  Redeemer.* 

This,  however,  does  not  present  to  us  the  whole  blessing 
of  that  form  of  the  New  Covenant  confirmed  to  Adam  in  the 
mysterious  promise,  The  Seed  of  the  woman  shall  bjuise 
the  SerpenVs  heady  shall  destroy  his  power,  and  defeof  his 
machinations.  To  our  imperfect  nature,  it  has  converted 
the  curse,  as  far  as  relates  to  the  evils  of  this  life,  its  labours 
and  its  pains,  into  a  merciful  dispensation;  a  corrector  of  its 
calamities,  still  more  than  their  punishment.  The  aches,  the 
pains,  and  diseases  incurred  by  the  Fall,  become  salutary 
monitors  of  our  guilty  original,  and  serve  to  lead  the  soul  to 

*  Se<?  Ihis  principU  farther  illn-.trateil .  under  tlie  lip^.t^  of  tlifi  scaU  of  the  covennni. 


336 

the  pious  contemplation  of  its  end.  Tiie  industry,  and  in« 
genuity  which,  in  a  state  of  innocence,  might  have  been  drawn 
forth,  by  virtuous  principle,  to  the  improvement  of  the  arts', 
the  ornaments,  and  comforts  of  life,  are  now  stimulated  by  its 
multiplied  wants  ;  the  necessity  of  labor  is  productive  of  the 
greatest  blessings  of  society.  The  dependence,  the  re- 
straints, the  corrections,  the  painful  application  of  childhood, 
and  lyouth,  are  requisite  for  the  early  cultivation  of  the  rea- 
son and  virtue  of  mankind.  Children,  amidst  all  their  imbe- 
cilities, are  first  protected,  and  then  made  wise  for  their  own 
protection,  by  the  wisdom  of  their  parents.  By  the  labours 
of  the  mind,  and  of  the  body,  human  nature  is  carried  for- 
ward towards  its  highest  improvement ;  and  the  world  itself 
is  created  anew  in  beauty,  and  rendered  subservient,  in  ten 
thousand  ways,  to  the  use  of  man.  The  curse  denounced  on 
the  woman,  that  in  pain  she  should  bring  forth  her  children, 
and  be  the  party  chiefly  subjected  to  the  anxieties  and  toils  of 
nursing  and  rearing  them,  is  made,  under  this  grace,  the  chief 
source  of  the  endearments  of  domestic  life.  If  children, 
from  their  earliest  infancy,  were,  like  the  young  of  many 
other  animals,  independent  of  the  protection,  and  the  nurtur- 
ing care  of  their  parents  ;  if  labor,  and  vigilance,  and  mutual 
assistance,  were  not  generally  requisite  for  the  support,  res- 
pectability, and  comfort  of  families,  the  principal  ties  of  paren- 
tal affection,  and  filial  duty  would  be  dissolved.  The  habits 
would  be  destroyed,  or  never  formed,  which  in  the  highest 
degree  contribute  to  the  happiness,  increase,  and  beneficial 


337 

intercourse  and  improvement  of  nalions.  Every  pain  which 
the  child  suffers,  every  risk  to  whicii  it  is  exposed,  endears, 
it  more  (o  the  parent ;  evejy  anxiefy,  expense,  and  sacrifice 
devoted  to  its  interest,  more  attaches  the  parciit.  Parents 
themselves,  from  these  causes,  become  more  tenderly  united 
to  one  another  ;  the  mother  by  her  pains,  her  sicknesses,  her 
constant  need  of  some  kind  support ;  the  father  by  the  man* 
}y  protection  and  superior  assiduities  which  he  is  able  to  af- 
ford to  her  delicate  weaknesses.  The  mutual  wants  of  indi- 
viduals and  of  families,  teach  them  to  sympathise  with  one 
another,  and  aid  their  easy  transition  into  national  sympathies, 
and  the  coalescing  of  mankind  into  great  communities. 

Under  the  Saviour,  therefore,  who  has  taken  the  world 
under  his  protection  and  grace,  the  curse  of  the  Fall,  how- 
ever much  to  be  lamented  in  its  original  cause,  has  been  ren- 
dered, in  many  respects,  a  blessing  to  our  fallen  and  imper- 
fect nature. 

f  HE  GENERAL  STRAIN  OF  THE  SACRED  WRITINGS,  A  STRONG- 
ER PROOF  OF  THE  DEPRAVITY  OF  HUMAN  NATURE, 
THAN  SINGLE  AND  DETACHED  PASSAGES. 

The  sinfulness  of  human  nature,  is  depicted  in  the  strong- 
est colours,  in  many  positive  declarations  throughout  the  sa- 
cred scriptures  ;  but  in  addition  to  the  direct  and  unequivo- 
cal evidence  of  many  detached  and  particular  passages^  ppr- 

43  ' 


338 

haps  a  more  couYincIng  proof  of  this  important  doctrine,  so 
humbling  to  tiie  pride  t)f  man,  results  from  the  general  strain 
of  fhc  whole  system  of  revealed  truth.  It  is  a  fundamental 
point  in  the  entire  fabric,  and  is  involved  in  all  its  principal 
doctrines.  If  a  Saviour  has  been  sent  into  the  world,  is  it 
not  to  deliver  mankind  fallen  and  perishing^  from  their  state 
of  sinfuhiesSy  and  its  consequent  miseries  ?  Is  it  not  to  the 
unholy  that  the  purchased  Spirit  is  given  to  assist  their  re- 
pentance ?  Was  it  not  to  those  whose  reason  had  been  ob- 
scured by  the  power  of  sin,  that  the  light  of  divine  truth 
had  become  necessary  ?  Was  not  this  also  the  language  of 
the  sacrifices  of  atonement  under  the  ancient  dispensation  ? 
Is  not  this  the  interpretation  of  the  doctrines  of  repentance, 
of  sanctifi^cation,  of  the  renovation  of  the  heart  under  the 
new  ?  Are  not  the  seals  -of  the  covenant,  under  both  dis- 
pensations, emblems  of  'd  necessary  purification.^  And  do 
not  the  whole  furnish  such  an  accumulation  of  evidence  on 
this  subject,  as  can  hardly  fail  to  carry  with  it,  to  the  candid 
mind,  complete  conviction  that  man  is  a  fallen  and  sinful 
being  ? 

THE  TESTIMONY  OF  EXPERIENCE. 

If  any  evidence  of  this  unhappy  fact  could  be  added  to 
the  clear  and  uniform  testimony  of  the  sacred  writings,  we 
might  derive  it  from  the  whole  history  and  experience  of  man« 
^ind.    Do  we  not  observe  the  malevolent  passions  of  humas 


S39 

nature  displaying  an  unhappy  force  from  the  earliest  years 
of  childhood  and  infancy  ?  Have  we  not,  from  our  most  re- 
mote remembrance,  perceived  within  our  hearts,  the  working 
of  many  impure  desires  and  unhallowed  passions  ?  Is  not 
ihe  history  of  man,  in  a  great  measure,  the  history  of  his 
crimes  ?  Does  not  the  world  present  to  us  rather  a  prisou 
destined  for  the  punishment  of  the  guilty,  than  a  paradise, 
the  delightful  habitation  of  innocence  ?  Does  not  the  infant 
feel  the  pangs,  and  utter  the  cries  of  pain,  from  the  moment 
of  its  birth  ?  Do  not  pain  and  disease,  though  now  sanctified 
to  the  penitent  by  the  Redeemer,  still  pursue  him,  till  they 
lay  him  in  the  grave?  Do  all  these  calamities  indicate  the 
etate  of  an  innocent  being,  under  the  government  of  a  most 
merciful  Creator  ?  Or  does  not  a  strong  impression  again 
result  from  the  whole,  that  man  is  fallen  and  guilty  ? 

OF  THE  EXTENT  OP  ORIGINAL  SIN,  AND  THE  MODE  OF  ITS 
TRANSMISSION. 

Two  questions  yet  remain  upon  this  subject,  which  merit 
the  attention  of  the  theological  student.  In  the  lirst  place, 
to  what  extent  is  human  nature  corrupted  ? 

Secondly,  how  is  that  sinful  nature  communicated,  so  as 
not  to  subject  God  most  holy,  to  the  impious  charge  of  being 
the  author  of  sin  ? 


ti40 

1.  On  Ihe  first,  it  is  the  decision  of  the  word  of  God,  and 
of  the  church,  that  the  depravity  of  human  nature  pervades 
it  in  its  whole  extent.  Its  rational  powers  are  perverse  in 
their  application,  or  rendered  impotent  through  sinful  ten- 
dency ;  and  all  its  moral  faculties,  in  their  habitual  action, 
have  become  criminal,  by  excess  in  their  pursuits,  by  de- 
fect in  their  principles,  or  their  motives,  or  by  misapplication 
in  their  objects.  The  first  moments  of  existence  are  cer- 
tainly *not  chargeable  with  actual  crimes,  but  with  such  per- 
version of  nature  from  its  original  rectitude,  that  its  earliest 
propensities,  emotions,  and  affections,  are  directed  to  wrong 
ends,  or  to  those  that  are  lawful  in  a  vicious  degree.  And, 
however  the  conduct  of  mankind  may,  in  many  parts  of  it, 
be  beneficial  to  their  fellow  men,  and,  in  so  far,  worthy  of  ap- 
probation, yet,  in  the  sight  of  God,  all  acts  are  unholy  in 
which  the  supreme  desire  of  the  soul  in  pursuing,  and  its  su- 
preme end  in  performing  Ihem,  is  not  to  render  obedience, 
and  glory  to  him  from  whom  all  existence  is  derived. 

2.  With  regard  to  the  second  question,  if  we  mean  to  ask 
bow  an  impure  and  depraved  nature  may  be  imparted  to  the 
posterity  of  Adam  without  involving  a  deep  reproach  on  the 
Author  of  our  being?  It  is  sufficient  to  answer,  as  the  suc- 
cession of  all  animals  is  continued.  The  whole  nature  of  the 
parent  is  imparted  to  the  offspring.  But  in  whajt  manner  this, 
or  any  of  the  works  of  creation  is  produced,  is  utterly  beyond 
our  knowledge.     The  tnodiis  operandi  is  the  secret  of  God. 


341 

But  to  say,  as  some  ^eak  men  have  done,  in  the  hope  of 
avoiding  rhe  iaipiety  of  making  God  the  auttior  of  a  dinful 
act,  that  God  formed  (he  soul  pure,  but  uniting  it  to  a  sinful, 
disordered,  or  merely  animal  body,  it  has,  by  this  junction, 
become  necessarily  infected  with  sin,  is  certainly  an  errant 
absurdity  of  pious  folly.  As  if  it  were  less  contrary  to  the 
purity  of  the  divine  nature  to  form  a  being  innocent,  and  im- 
mediately subject  it  to  a  state  of  necessary  infection,  than  to 
suffer  the  laws  of  the  universe  freely  to  operate,  by  which  an 
impure  effect  must  proceed  from  an  impure  cause — a  sinful 
progeny  from  sinful  parents.  Of  much  more  moment  is  it  to 
us,  saith  Saint  Augustine,  to  understand  how  we  are  <!eliv- 
ered  from  sin  by  Jesus  Christ,  than  to  be  able  to  explain  in  ' 
what  manner  we  have  derived  it  from  Adam. 


OF  THE 

COVENANT  OF  GRACE, 

1.  OP  VICARIOUS  SUBSTITUTION,  AlfD  ATONEMENT. 


From  the  declarations  of  holy  scripture  it  appears  that, 
immediately  after  the  Fall,  our  condemned  and  unhappy  pa- 
rent, together  with  his  whole  race  were,  in  the  infinite  mercy 
of  God,  transferrecl  from  the  Covenant  of  Works,  now  brok- 
fen,  and  cancelled  as  the  condition  of  life,  and  placed  under 
the  protection  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  organized  and  ad- 
ministered under  a  Mediator,  through  whom  their  repentance 
might  be  accepted  with  their  heavenly  Father,  and  the  Ho- 
ly Spirit  imparted  to  sanctify  and  restore  their  fallen  nature. 
In  treating  of  this  covenant  to  which  I  now  proceed,  the  first 
consideration  which  requires  our  attention,  and  that,  indeed, 
which  is  fundamental  to  its  existence,  is  the  necessity  of  full 
and  complete  satisfaction  for  the  sin  of  man.  On  no  other 
condition  could  the  holiness  and  justice  of  God  receive  the 
repentance  of  the  sinner,  and  admit  him  to  a  new  probation, 
on  a  new  covenant,  for  eternal  life.  In  discussing  this  sub- 
ject, three  preliminary  questions  present  themselves  to  our 
inquiry.  1.  In  the  first  place,  was  satisfaction,  or  atone- 
ment for  the  sin  of  man  indispensable  to  the  existence  of  any 


344 

new  covenant  in  his  favour  ?  2.  As  man  is  utterly  unable  to 
offe^  an  atonement  adequate  to  the  demerit  of  sin,  is  vica- 
rious satisfaction,  in  the  person  of  another,  either  possible, 
or  just  in  itself,  or  useful  in  the  administration  of  the  divine 
government  over  mankind  ?  3.  Could  satisfaction  oflfered  by 
any  being  less  than  a  divine  person,  be  accepted  in  the  room 
of  the  sinner  ? 

OF  THE    NECESSITY    OF  ATONEMENT. 

There  are  writers  who  affirm  that  Almighty  God  might 
by  an  act  of  sovereignty,  have  mercifully  dispensed  with 
an  J  satisfaction  for  sin,  and  freely  forgiven  the  offender,  on 
his  sincere  repentance. — What  God  might,  in  sovereignty, 
have  done,  or  could  not,  in  consistency  with  the  laws  of  eter- 
nal justice,  do,  seems  impossible  to  be  wisely  and  safely  de- 
termined by  us,  and  cannot  be  decided  without  presumption. 
We  are  infinitely  more  concerned  to  understand  what  God 
hath  actually  done,  and,  from  the  fact,  to  pronounce  upoQ 
its  justice,  and  utility.  I  may,  however,  be  permitted  to  ob- 
serve, that  this  opinion  seems  to  be  founded  on  very  inade- 
quate apprehensions  of  the  necessary  nature,  and  the  inflexi- 
ble claims  of  his  holiness.  And  there  are  many  important 
considerations  which  render  it  reasonable  to  believe  that  the 
punishment  of  the  sinner,  or  a  vicarious  satisfaction  to  the 
justice  of  the  law,  in  the  person  of  a  mediator,  in  all  res- 
pects coiupeteot  to  this  offering,  was  an  indispensable  require* 


A.: 


345 

ioacnt  in  the  government  of  God.    Indeed  the  fact,  tLat  it 
has  been  made,  13  decisive  proof  that  it  is  holi/i  just,  and 
good.     The  apostle,  in  contemplating  this  subject,  devout- 
ly  exclaims  ; — '«  O  the  depth  of  the  riches  both  of  the  wis- 
dom and  knowledge  of  God !    How  unsearchable  is  his  wis- 
dom I  and  his  ways  past  finding  out !"     Now  "  to  principal- 
ities and  powers  in  heaVenly  places,  is  known  by  the  church 
the  manifold  wisdom  ofiGod."     All  iLe  moral  attributes  ot  the 
Eternal  are  represented,  in  the  holy  scriptures,  as  havino" 
their  most  harmonious,  and  illustrious  display  in  the  death  of 
Christ.     In  no  other  way,   it  is  reasonable  to  believe,  could 
the  holiness,  the  purity,  the  justice,  and  the  mercy  of  the 
divine  nature  have  been  demonstrated  to  mankind  with  such 
profound  and  impressive  effect.     The  accumulated  testimo- 
ny of  his  holy  word  leads  to  the  conclusion,  that,  in  consis- 
tency with  his  perfections  "  he  can  by  no  means  clear  the 
guilty.     He  is  of  purer  eyes  than  to  behold  iniquity.     Ami 
he  cannot  look  upon  sin  but  with  abhorrence." 

When  we  bring  this  subject  to  the  rigorous  test  of  reasoa, 
reason  pronounces  the  holiness  and  justice  of  the  divine  na- 
ture to  be  not  less  essential  to  his  being,  and  his  glory,  than 
goodness  and  mercy.  The  requisitions  of  justice,  therefore, 
must  be  acknowledged  to  be  equally  necessary  in  their  nature 
with  the  demands  of  his  most  benevolent  attributes.  Many 
writers,  indeed,  we  have  seen  contend  for  this  principle  that 

justice  differs  from  other  divine  perfections,  in  this  respect, 

44 


ihat  its  lights  may  al;vaj3  be  lelinquisheil  without  wrong- 
Admitting  this  maxim  to  be  true  in  matters  of  private  right 
between  man  and  man ;  yet,  even  in  human  transactions,  it 
does  not  hold  with  regard  to  its  exercise  in  persons  invested 
with  a  public  character,  and  in  cases  in  which  the  public 
good  is  essutiallj  concerned.  The  rnagistralc  cannot  dis- 
pense with  the  execution  of  the  law. 

OF  THE  JUSTICE  AND  CTILITT  OF  VICARIOUS  SATISFACTION, 

As  man  is  incapable,  by  his  obedience,  or  his  sufferings, 
of  rendering  complete  satisfaction  to  the  violated  law,  the  jus- 
tice and  propriety  of  vicarious  substitution  has  grown  up  in 
{he  church  into  an  occasion  of  warm  and  uncharitable  con- 
troversy. The  Socinians  strenuously  deny  the  equity  of 
substituting  the  innocent  in  the  room  of  the  guilty,  and  the 
utility  of  accepting  the  obedience,  or  the  sufferings  of  one  in- 
stead of  those  of  another.  This  objection  could  not  easily  be 
answered  if  the  substitute  were  obtruded,  by  any  constraint,  in 
the  room  of  the  sufferer,  or,  if,  from  any  deficiency  of  power, 
or  of  dignity,  he  were  incompetent  to  the  high  and  arduous 
duty.  To  form  a  fair  and  equitable  decision  on  this  subject, 
It  would  be  requisite  to  be  well  informed  concerning  the  fol- 
lowing facts  :— in  the  first  place,  whether  the  substitution  be 
perfectly  voluntary  in  him  who  assumes  the  part  of  the  suf- 
ferer ;  in  the  next  place,  whether  he  be  free  and  independent^ 
and  have  the  entire  right  to  dispose  of  his  own  life,  without 


34r 

being  accountable  to  any  superior ;  likewise,  whether  he  be 
perfeclly  coaipetent  to  the  undertaking,  so  that,  from  the  in- 
trinsic merit  and  dignify  of  his  act,  it  may  subserve  all  the 
wise  and  benevolent  purposes  of  the  law ;  whether,  also,  ia 
assuming  this  part,  he  be  not  lost  to  the  universal  interests 
of  society,  so  that  no  gain  to  the  great  public  of  nature  accrue 
from  the  substitution  ;  and,  finally,  whether  the  party,  chiefly 
offended,  be  pleased  and  willing  to  accept  the  substitute  in 
the  room  of  the  original  offender.* 

If  all  these  facts  are  fullj'  ascertained,  and  these  conditions 
strictly  exacted,  vicarious  satisfaction  appears  to  be  entirely- 
consistent  with  the  principles  of  the  soundest  reason.  If  the 
substitute  be  free  to  dispose  of  his  own  person,  and  willing 
lo  undertake  this  benevolent  office,  the  rights  of  justice  can- 
not be  impaired,  nor  the  general  interest  injured  by  the  ex- 
change. Perhaps  the  sanction  of  the  law  appears  more  awful, 
and  is  rendered  more  effectual,  when  the  penalty  ig,  without 
abatement,  exacted  of  the  surety,  than  when  claimed  of  the 
principal  hiaiself.  An  example  in  ancient  history  has  been 
often  appealed  to,  as  illustrating  this  point  with  particular 
force.  The  legislator  of  the  Locrlans  had  enacted  a  law  that 
any  man  convicted  of  adultery,  should  be  punished  with  the 
loss  of  both  his  eyes.  His  own  son  happened  to  be  ihe  first 
criniiaal  condemned  on  this  statute.     The  father,  mingling 

■■  Pr.  Witlierepoon^s  Lectures  on  the  Covecant  of  Grace. 


34a 

the  righteous  severity  of  the  judge  with  the  compassion  of 
the  jtarent,  decreed  that  his  son  should  lose  one  of  hie  eyes, 
and  hat,  for  the  other  which  justice  required,  he  himself 
would  lose  one,  in  order  perfectly  to  satisfy  the  requisition 
of  the  law.  Every  man,  who  is  acquainted  with  the  feelings 
of  a  parent,  and  the  self-love  of  human  nature,  must  pronounce 
this  act  the  strongest  proof  that  could  be  given  to  the  nation, 
of  the  inexorable  justice  of  the  legislator.  It  is  obvious  that 
such  a  vicarious  substitution  must  have  had  a  mere  useful  in- 
fluence on  the  public  morals,  than  the  suffering  of  the  full 
penalty  by  the  culprit  in  his  own  person.  On  the  same  clear 
and  acknowledged  sentiment  in  the  human  breast,  the  substi- 
tution of  the  Son  of  God,  in  the  room  of  our  sinful  nature, 
was  the  most  effectual  sanction  of  the  divine  law  which  could 
have  been  exhibited  to  the  universe. 

Besides  the  obvinns  consistency  of  this  doctrine  with  the 
principles  of  reason  and  of  public  justice,  it  is  explicitly  de- 
clared throughout  the  sacred  scriptures,  in  the  strongest  and 
most  unequivocal  terms,  to  be,  at  once,  the  truth  of  God,  and 
the  only  hope  of  man.  The  term  satisfactiont  indeed,  is 
technical,  and  employed  chiefly  by  modern  divines,  for  the 
convenience  of  their  systematic  arrangements.  But  every 
idea  included  in  the  full  and  most  comprehensive  meaning  of 
the  word,  is  taught  in  the  scriptures  in  the  plainest  language, 
and  illustrated  by  the  most  affecting  images.  Under  the  an- 
cient institution,  on  the  great  day  of  atonement,  and  ercD  at 


m 


^49 

the  dally  sacrifices,  certain  mpii  were  appointed  to  represent 
the  people  of  Israel,  and  to  lay  their  hands  upon  the  head  of 
(he  victim,  confessing  the  sins  of  the  nation.  This  grave 
and  serious  action  can  have  no  reasonable  interpretation  but 
as  a  vicarious  substitution  of  the  sacrifice  in  the  room  of  the 
offender,  and  a  typical  transfer  of  guilt  from  him  to  the  vic- 
tim. The  same  idea  is  connected  with  that  office  of  religion 
wherein  the  priests  of  Israel  sprinkled  the  blood  of  the  sacri* 
fice  upon  the  horns  of  the  altar,  sanctifying,  by  that  act,  both 
the  sacrifice  and  the  altar  ;  in  allusion  to  which  holy  rite  the 
blood  of  Christ  is  called  the  blood  of  sprinkling,  purifying 
all  things  covered  by  its  sacred  efficacy.  The  language  of 
the  prophet  is  peculiarly  forcible.  "  He  was  wounded  for 
our  transgressions.  He  was  bruised  for  our  iniquities.  The 
chastisement  of  our  peace  was  upon  him ;  a^d  with  his  stripes 
we  are  healed.  When  he  shall  give  his  soul  an  offering  for 
ain,  he  shall  see  his  seed — he  shall  prolong  his  days — and 
the  pleasure  of  the  Lord  shall  prosper  in  his  hands.  If, 
however,  there  were  any  obscurity  in  the  type,  and  the  fig- 
ured language  of  the  prophecy,  the  same  truth  is  taught  un- 
der the  simplicity  of  the  evangelic  dispensation,  in  a  style 
that  can  hardly  leave  any  doubt  in  a  fair  and  candid  mind. 
Let  me  appeal  to  a  few  passages  only,  as  an  example  of  a 
great  part  of  the  sacred  volume.  Of  the  church,  and  of  eve- 
ry individual  believer,  it  is  said,  "  they  have  been  bought 
with  a  price.  Redeemed  not  with  corruptible  things,  such 
as  silver,  and  gold,  but  with  the  precious  blood  of  Christ, 


359 

"  This  is  my  blood,"  saith  Christ  of  himself,  "  slied  for  many, 
for  the  remission  of  sins.  He  gave  himself  a  ransom  for  all.'* 
And  the  triumphant  ascription  of  the  whole  church  is,  "  unto 
him  that  loved  us,  and  washed  us  from  our  sins  in  his  own 
blood !"  The  arts  of  criticism  have  been  employed,  with 
great  industry,  to  give  these  and  similar  expressions  a  remote, 
and  feeble,  and  circuitous  interpretation.  But  every  reader 
must  be  sensible  of  the  efibrt  that  appears  to  accommodate 
the  language  to  a  favourite  theory,  and  Ihe  little  resemblance 
which,  under  this  disguise,  it  bears  to  the  plainness  and  sim- 
plicity of  the  gospel.  The  obvious  meaning  of  the  terms,  on 
the  other  hand,  presents  to  the  mind,  on  their  first  impression^ 
the  doctrine  of  the  atonement.  From  the  preceding  illustra- 
tions and  reflections,  we  evidently  perceive  the  principle  of 
vicarious  satisfaction  established  by  the  explicit  and  unequiv- 
ocal testimony  of  the  word  of  God,  as  it  had  before  been  vin- 
dicated by  the  clear  decisions  of  reason. 

THAT  IT  IS  REQUISITE  THAT  SATISFACTION  BE  MADE  BY 
A  DIVINE  PERSON. 

A  third  question  still  remains  upon  this  subject,  which, 
from  its  nature,  and  its  consequences,  is  of  the  highest  im- 
portance : — Could  any  satisfaction  for  the  sin  of  human  na- 
ture, less  than  that  offered  by  a  divine  person,  be  accepted  by 
the  justice  of  God  ?     From  the  whole  tenor  of  the  sacred 


writiugs,  it  appears  that  an  atoniDg  sacrifice  of  infinite  value  is 
the  indispensable  requisition  of  eternal  justice. 

But  there  is  something  so  awful,  and  so  profoundly  hum- 
bling to  the  soul  in  this  consideration,  that  various  evasions 
have  been  resorted  to  for  the  purpose  of  weakening  its  im- 
pression. It  is  asked  whether  some  superior  order  of  created 
spirits  may  not  be  so  far  exalted  above  human  nature,  as  to 
be  able  by  obedience  and  suflTering  to  offer  ample  satisfaction 
to  the  righteousness  of  (he  offended  law.  To  this  inquiry  it 
may  most  justly  be  replied,  that  no  created  being  can  be  so 
far  raised  in  nature  as  to  make  the  smallest  approximation  to 
Deity ;  or  to  be  capable  of  offering  an  atonement  for  sin  that 
shall  cover,  in  any  degree,  the  demerit  of  its  guilt.  Any 
finite  being  must,  for  this  purpose,  be  liable  to  the  suffering 
of  eternal  pains  ;  a  sacrifice  that  could  contribute  nothing  to 
4hc  illustration  of  the  mercy  of  our  heavenly  Father.  Be- 
sides, is  not  every  created  being  under  the  highest  natural 
obligations  to  do,  or  suffer  whatever  he  shall  understand  the 
glory  of  God,  and  the  general  interests  of  charity  and  benevo- 
lence require  ;  and  if  it  were  possible  that  the  most  exalted 
creature  could  have  redeemed  mankind,  and  glorified  God, 
by  any  temporary  sufferings,  this  sacrifice  would,  in  the  na- 
ture of  things  have  been  an  original  and  indispensable  duty  ; 
and  the  antecedent  obligation  would  have  deprived  the  offer- 
ing of  all  imputable  merit,  which  can  reside  only  in  the  act 
of  a  free  and  independent  being.     But  the  fact  of  the  appoint 


^1^ 


55-2 

meat  of  the  Son  of  God  to  this  propitiatory  office,  whose  na- 
ture has  before  been  proved  to  be  divine,  is  itself  demonstra- 
tion that  no  inferior  victim  could  have  been  accepted.  For, 
is  it  possible  to  believe  that  the  eternal  Jehovah  would  have 
made  such  a  useless  expenditure,  if  I  may  speak  so,  of  divine 
perfection,  when  the  same  end  might  have  been  attained  by 
means  so  far  inferior  ? 

It  has  been  urged  with  a  triumph  in  the  force  of  the  objec- 
tion, and  with  a  confidence  far  from  being  warranted  by  the 
strength  of  the  argument,  that  the  supposition  of  satisfaction 
being  exhibited  by  a  person,  in  his  nature  divine,  involves  the 
absurdity  of  the  Supreme  Being  making  satisfaction  to  him- 
self. To  repel  this  suggestion,  let  it  be  recollected,  that  sin 
is  not  so  much  an  offence  against  Almighty  God,  personally 
considered,  if  it  is  lawful  to  use  this  form  of  expression  with 
regard  to  the  Deity,  as  a  violation  of  the  principles  of  eternal 
justice,  and,  if  we  may  speak  so,  of  the  public  law  of  the  uni- 
verse. And  there  are  not  wanting  many  examples  wherein  a 
magistrate  may  so  far  lay  aside  his  public  character  as,  in  his 
own  person,  to  satisfy  the  requisitions  of  the  law, 

OP  THE  COVENANT  OP  GRACE* 

The  Covenant  of  Grace  is  defined  by  many  eminent  and 
pious  divines  to  be  a  stipulation  or  agreement  between  God, 
and  the  believing  sinner,  to  bestow  on  him  freely,  through 


25^ 

Christ,  the  forgiveness  of  sins  that  are  jjctstj  iQipaitlng,  at  the 
same  time,  the  spirit  of  sanctification  to  renew  and  periect  his 
nature,  and  finally,  to  bring  him  to  the  possession  of  elernal 
life ;  which  mercies  the  believer  accepting  wilh  an  humble 
and  sincere  faith,  that  purifies  the  heart,  the  act  assumes  the 
character  and  form  of  a  covenant.  But  as  there  is  an  infinite 
distance  between  God  most  holy,  and  a  sinful  worm  of  the 
dust ;  and  as  the  whole  transaction  is  a  free  gift,  entirely 
gratuitous  on  the  part  of  God,  to  style  it  a  covenant  is  the 
language  of  divine  condescension.  Yet  this  is  the  gracious 
form  of  words  employed  by  God  himself.  In  the  sacred 
scriptures  it  is  denominated  a  covenant  of  peace  ;  and  mer- 
cifully announced  as  a  new  covenant,  to  distinguish  it  from 
the  covenant  of  works,  and  the  covenant  of  Sinai.  And, 
finally,  it  is  declared  to  be  an  everlasting  covenant,  as  the 
characteristic  distinction  between  it  and  every  temporary  in- 
stitution establfshed  by  God  with  his  people. 

On  the  preceding  considerations,  I  prefer  another  defini- 
tion, warranted  by  the  best  writers,  more  appropriate  and 
descriptive  of  the  genuine  nature  of  this  covenant.  It  is  that 
of  a  free  and  gratuitous  promise  from  the  Father  of  Mercies, 
to  all  who  receive  the  blessing  with  penitent  faith,  of  the  par- 
don of  sin  through  the  atonement  of  the  Redeemer,  accom- 
panied with  the  sanctifying  influence  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  to 
lead  them  by  the  grace  of  holy  living,  to  life  and  immortaU 

i/?/,  all  which  merciful  propositions  the  belierer  sincerely  ac-' 

45 


^5i 

cepting,  it  is  lliereby  constituted  an  actual  and  formal  cove- 
nant. This  definition  is  conformable  to  the  language  of  the 
sacred  word,  in  which  this  gracious  transaction  is  called 
the  pro7nise,  and  the  promise  made  of  old  unto  the  fathers^ 
And,  indeed,  when  this  whole  system  of  grace  is  atten- 
tivelj  considered,  it  is  to  be  regarded  chiefly  as  a  pro- 
mise made  to  sinners  through  Christ,  to  invite  them  to  re- 
pentance and  ncjv  obedience  by  the  blessed  and  glorious 
hopes  of  the  gospel ;  when  it  assumes  the  form  of  that  spe- 
cies of  covenant  distinguished  in  our  moral  and  civil  codes 
by  the  title  of  gratuitous. 

Every  covenant,  however,  is,  from  its  nature,  invested  with 
certain  conditions  which  give  it  an  air  of  reciprocity.  The 
condition  of  acceptance^  at  least,  is  indispensable  in  the  most 
gi^atuitous  promise;  and  although  salvation  is  an  effect  of 
the  freest  grace,  yet,  in  order  to  the  application  of  the  merits 
of  the  Lord  Jesus  Christfor  this  ernif  faith,  as  it  has  already 
been  explained,  may  be  regarded  as  a  pre-requisite  condi- 
tion ;  and  holiness  of  heart,  which  is  necessary  to  the  actual 
possession  of  the  final  reward  of  the  covenant ;  eternal  life, 
may  be  considered  as  an  xdterior  condition.  But  these  con- 
ditions are  not  to  be  viewed  as  constituting  the  meritorious 
causes  of  the  blessing,  or  forming  a  real  reciprocity  in  the 
covenant,  but  simply  as  terms  of  qualification  necessary  to 
prepare  the  believer,  by  the  renovation  of  his  nature,  and  of 
all  his  moral  tastes,  for  the  enjoyment  of  his  heavenly  inhecit? 


Ance.  The  vrhole  phrase,  however,  of  the  covenant  ofgraci, 
though  amply  justified  by  the  language  of  scripture,  is  tech- 
nical, and  invented,  as  many  others  have  been,  for  the  cott- 
venience  of  systematic  arrangement. 

A  MISTAKEN  VIEW  OF  THE  COVENANT  OP  GRACE* 

From  the  imbecility  of  the  human  mind,  and  the  different 
conceptions  often  entertained  by  men  of  the  same  subject,  we 
are  frequently,  and  unhappily  met  by  controversy  in  theolo- 
gy, as  well  as  in  other  sciences.  Those  writers  who,  from  their 
disinclination  to  considering  the  observance  of  the  moral  law 
as  forming  any  condition  of  the  covenant  of  our  salvation, 
are  stiled  Antinomians,  maintain  this  peculiar  opinion,  that 
the  Covenant  of  Grace  is  not  made  with  believers  through 
the  mediation  of  Christ ;  but  has  been  established,  from  eter- 
nity, with  Christ  in  the  name  of  all  believers.  The  paternal 
Deity,  before  the  foundation  of  the  world,  entered  into  cove- 
nant with  the  Son,  to  give  him  a  certain  number  out  of  the 
fallen  human  race,  to  be  called,  sanctified  and  saved  by  him, 
upon  his  consenting  to  assume  human  nature,  and  make 
atonement  for  their  sins  by  his  death.  Founded  on  this  sup- 
posed transaction  between  the  eternal  persons  of  the  God- 
head, they  affirm  the  sole  condition  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace 
to  be,  not  the  obedience  and  faith  of  the  believer,  but  the 
righteousness  of  Christ,  making  the  believer  a  mere  passive 
subject  of  mercy,  and  not  responsible  for  any  of  hi^  sins  past, 


356 

or  lo  come.  Chrisf,  the  sole  agent  and  representative  of  his 
people  in  this  e!crnal  transaction  has,  according  to  their  prin- 
cip;  s,  assumed  all  responsibility  upon  himself  with  regard 
to  this  chosen  number,  leaving  the  rest  of  mankind,  without 
an>  provision  lor  their  salvation,  to  perish  among  those  hope- 
less spirits  who  kept  not  their  first  estate. — Good  men,  I 
doubt  not,  have  embraced  this  extravagant  system  as  there  is 
Ko  absurdity  of  which  the  human  mind,  on  some  occasions, 
is  not  susceptible.  But  to  me  it  appears  fraught  with  pre- 
sumption in  pretending  to  unfold  the  transactions  of  the  De- 
ity with  himself;  and  with  extreme  folly,  leading  to  the 
most  immoral  consequences  among  enthusiastic  men.  This 
imaginary  transaction  has  been  called  the  Covenant  of  Re- 
demfitimii  and  although  so  fanciful,  has,  under  certain  modi- 
fications, been  embraced  by  some  grave  and  profound  calvi- 
nislic  writers.  In  its  unmodified  extent,  it  presents  to  us  ma- 
ny dogmas  which,  in  their  obvious  import,  must  shock  the 
common  sense  of  mankind.  To  justify  the  severity  of  this 
aniniadversion,  the  following  examples  will  be  more  than  suf- 
ficient. Believers^  they  say,  are  justified  from  all  eternity. 
^^In  thetn  God  sees  no  sin  for  Christ^ s  sake, — I'he  merits 
of  the  Second  Adam  are  as  certainly  and  essentially 
transferredy  from  their  birth,  to  his  elect  seedy  as  the  default 
of  the  first  Adam  to  his  naluraUoff spring. — The  elect  cannot 
throw  themselves  out  of  the  covenants  but  their  justification 
tqvcdly  remains  rvhether  ihcy  fulfil  the  law  of  righteousness, 
or,  through  the  fraiity  of  their  nature,  fall  into  any  st?i. 


357 

Christ  having  assumed  all  responsibility ^  and  perfectly  sai- 
isfed  the  law  for  them-  Many  other  absuidilies,  not  less 
gross  and  palpable,  nakirally  growing  out  of  their  principles, 
are  found  in  their  writings,  which  some  ingenious  men  have 
thought  they  find  means  of  explaining  in  consistency  with 
good  morals.  For  this  bold  irreverence  of  the  imagination 
some  expressions  of  the  sacred  writings  have  given  a  very 
slender  pretence  indeed.  *'  I  have  set  ray  king,'*  saith  the 
Psalmist,  "  upon  my  holy  hill  of  Zion.  I  will  declare  the 
decree  :  the  Lord  said  unto  me,  thou  art  my  Son,  this  day 
have  I  begotten  thee.  Ask  of  me  and  I  will  give  thee  the 
heathen  for  thine  inheritance,  and  the  uttermost  parts  of  the 
earth  for  thy  possession,  Ps.  ii.  6.  sacrifice  and  offering  thou 
didst  not  desire.  Then  said  I,  lo  !  I  come  ;.  in  the  volume 
of  the  book  it  is  written  of  aie;  I  delight  to  do  thy  will,  O 
my  God,"  Ps.  xl.  6.  And  Isaiah,  in  a  fine  poetic  rhapsody, 
has  sung  in  the  following  strains ; — "  Behold  my  servant 
whom  I  uphold,  mine  elect  in  whom  my  soul  delighteth !  I 
have  put  my  spirit  upon  him.  He  shall  bring  forth  judg- 
ment to  the  Gentiles.  1  the  Lord  have  called  thee  in  right- 
eousness ;  I  will  hold  thine  hand,  and  keep  thee,  and  give 
thee  for  a  covenant  of  the  people,  for  a  light  of  the  Gentiles 
— to  open  the  blind  eyes,  to  bring  out  the  prisoners  from  the 
prison,  and  those  that  sit  in  darkness  out  of  the  prison  house." 
Surely  a  man  must  have  strong  attachments  to  a  system,  and 
a  most  oblique  facility  of  interpreting  the  scriptures,  who  can 
6nd   the   Covenant  of  Redemption  in  such    poetical   and 


^58 

dramatic  representations  as  these  of  the  counsels,  and  de- 
sif^ns  of  Heaven,  which  exhibit  Christ  as  the  Illuminator  of 
the  world,  and  that  Great  Prophet  destined  to  extend  his 
church  to  the  remotest  ends  of  the  earth.  But  when  these 
writers  can  interpret,  in  this  manner,  a  political  convention— 
The  counsel  of  peace  shall  be  between  them  both — Zech.  vi. 
13.  it  assumes  an  appearance  little  less  than  ludicrous.  I  per- 
fectly accord  with  the  opinion  expressed  on  this  subject,  by 
Dr.  Witherspoon.  "  For  my  own  part,"  says  he,  "  1  fear 
to  attempt  to  explain  what  is  called  the  Covenant  of  Redemp- 
tion, or  to  admit  its  existence.  I  fear  it  is  humanizing  too 
much  our  ideas  of  the  divine  nature,  and  presuming  too  far  on 
our  understanding  the  nature  of  the  Trinity,  and  the  trans- 
actions between  its  persons,  if  I  may  use  that  human  phrase 
thus  to  give  form  to  their  counsels,  thus  to  apply  to  them 
what,  perhaps  can  only  be  proper  when  applied  to  the  aflfairs 
of  men.  Besides,  if  we  give  scope  to  our  fancy,  and  endeav- 
our to  embarrass  with  such  technical  forms  of  expression,  the 
science  of  divine  things,  we  might  find  a  covenant  in  almost 
every  act  of  God.  But  the  being  of  God  is  unsearchable  : 
and  I  apprehend,  there  is  more  of  presumption  and  folly,  than 
of  piety  and  wisdom  in  a  worm  of  dust  attempting  to  modify 
his  eternal  counsels  with  himself."* 


*  Taken  down  verbatim  by  the,  author  from  a  discourse  delivered  by  Dr.  W. 
before  his  Theological  class. 


359 


OF  THE  CONSTlTUTIOff  OP  THE  COVENANT  OF  GRACE  1> 
ITS  PROMISES  AND  CONDITIONS. 

In  the  constidition  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace  the  primary 
and  essential  principle  which  distinguishes  it  from  the  abroga- 
ted covenant  with  Adam  is,  that  all  its  blessings  are  the 
effects  of  the  free  and  unmerited  mercy  of  fleaven.  Man, 
having  incurred,  from  the  justice  of  his  offended  Creator,  ab- 
solute and  eteriial  condemnation,  the  whole  plan  of  his  re- 
covery— his  present  mercies,  and  his  eternal  hopes  are  sim- 
ply and  entirely  of  grace  ;  not  the  effect  of  obedience  to  the 
prescriptions  of  a  law,  but  the  result  of  the  mere  favour  of 
God.  For  this  end  the  system  of  redemption  was  instituted 
by  Jehovah  liimself,  through  the  mediation  of  Jesus  Christ, 
who  should,  by  his  obedience,  satisfy  the  holy  requisitions  of 
his  law,  and  by  his  sufferings,  vindicate  the  righteous  claims 
of  his  justice.  On  this  foundation  of  obedience  and  suffer- 
ing, Christ  becomes  the  author  of  eternal  life  to  all  who  be- 
lieve in  his  name.  And  the  whole  redemption  of  mankind  is 
exhibited  to  us  in  the  sacred  writings,  as  the  fruit  of  the  freest 
mercy,  and  the  effect  simply  of  the  benignity  of  God  most  ho- 
ly, to  the  offending  race  of  man.  ft  is  of  faiths  saith  Are  apos- 
tle, </iaft7  might  be  of  grace,  Rom.  iv.  16.  And  the  Evangel- 
ist affirms  that  God  so  loved  the  world,  that  he  gave  hisonli^ 
begotten  Son,  that  whosoever  believeth  in  him,  should  not 
perish,  but  have  everlasting  life. — This  covenant  is  establish- 


360 

ed,  not  with  man  innocent  as  was  that  with  our  original  parent, 
but  with  man  fallen  and  guilty,  through  a  Mediator  ;  so  that 
now,  every  blessing  is  derived  to  believers  through  Jesus 
Christ,  who,  ofGody  is  made  unto  us  tvisdonit  and  righteous- 
ness, and  sand ijicat ion,  and  redemption. 

One  definition  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  already  presented 
to  the  reader,  styles  it  siuiply  a  proldse,  and  states  it  to  con- 
sist of  a  system  of  gracious  promises  given  as  the  consola- 
tion of  human  nature  in  its  fallen  and  unhappy  condition. 
These  promises  have  been  arranged,  in  different  orders,  but 
all  embracing,  in  the  result,  the  same  comprehensive  field.  In 
order  to  their  more  distinct  illustration,  and  omitting,  for  the 
sake  of  brevity,  the  detailed  exhibition  made  of  them  by  ma- 
ny writers,  I  shall  dispose  them  in  tte  following  series,  as  be- 
ing most  accommodated  for  convenience  and  use  in  preaching 
the  gospel.  I.  In  the  first  place,  the  promises  .of  a  Saviwir. 
— II.  Next,  as  the  free  pardon  of  sin  through  him. — III. 
Thirdly,  of  the  Spirit  of  sanctification. — IV.  In  the  fourth 
place,  of  the  favour  of  God,  and  all  its  happy  fruits  in  the 
present  state.^ — V.  And  finally,  of  everlasting  life  in  a  future 
world.* 


*  The  analysis  of  the  covenaDt  considered  in  this  vie^r,  by  Dr.  W.  presented 
lo  his  class. 


361 


1.    OF  THE  PROMISE  OF  A  SAVIOUR. 

In  the  arrangement  of  the  blessings  of  the  covenant,  the 
promise  of  a  Saviour  justly  stands  in  the  first  place  ;  because 
it  was  the  first  made  to  our  afflicted  father,  after  his  fatal  de- 
linquency. It  is  likewise  that  primary  gift  on  which  all  the 
rest  depend.  And  it  aff^jrds  the  first  ray  of  consolation  and 
Lope  to  a  soul  under  the  conviction  of  sin.  This  distinguish- 
ed and  leading  promise,  therefore,  embraces  the  complete 
atonement  of  sin  by  the  sacrifice  of  Christ.  It  points  to 
Christ  as  the  fountain  of  every  mercy  to  mankind,  and  the 
channel  through  which  they  are  conveyed  to  his  people. 
He  is  the  great  and  comprehensive  promise  made  of  God  mi* 
to  thefalherSf  embracing  all  the  blessings  of  the  gospel.  He 
is  the  hope  which  the  ancient  church  of  Israel  waited  for  ; 
and,  a  still  more  glorious  distinction — He  is  the  desire  of  all 
nations  ;  for  his  propitiatory  sacrifice,  even  when  unknown, 
is  the  foundation  of  acceptance  to  every  true  penitent  among 
the  Gentiles,  as  it  was  to  the  saints  anterior  to  the  age  of  the 
patriarch  Abraham.  He  is,  in  one  word,  the  salvation  of  God. 

2.    OF  THE  FREE  AND  FULL  PARDON  OF  BIN. 

The  second  promise  of  the  covenant,  as  they  have  been 

just  arranged,  is  the  free  and  full  pardon  of  sin  to  those  who 

humbly    and   penitently  seek   this   mercy   through  Jesuf' 
4R 


362 

Christ.     It  is  consolatorj  to  mankind,  under  the  view  of 
their  sins,  lo  perceive,  in  the  benevolent  purposes  of  God  a 
Saviour  ordained  for  the  sincere  penitent.     But  frequently, 
beneath  tlic  deep  and  overwhelming  compunctions  of  gailt, 
the  humbled  spirit  of  the  sinner  trembles  at  the  thought  of  dar- 
ing to  appropriate  the  merits  of  that  Saviour,  the  blessings  of 
that  promise,  to  itself.     It  requires  the  most  clear  and  explicit 
assurance  of  the  gospel  for  its  encouragement  in  making  this 
particular  application  of  the  general  offer  of  divine  mercy.    A 
consideration  which  renders  the  free  and  gracious  promise  of 
pardon  through  the  Redeemer  so  precious  to  the  convinced 
soul.    The  fears  of  guilt  require  the  supporting  hand  of  divine 
grace  to  save  it  from  utterly  despairing.     For  this  reason,  the 
Holy  Spirit  in  his  sacred  oracles,  pitying  the  infirmity  of  our 
nature,  crushed  under  the  terrors  of  the  law,  seems  to  have 
exhausted  the  powers  of  language  for  consolations  and  en- 
couragements to  the  repentant  sinner.     Ho  !  every  one  that 
ihhsteth,  come  ye  to  the  waters  ;  and  he  that  hath  no  money  ! 
come;    buy  wine  and  milkj  without  money ^  and  without 
mice.     It  was  the  special  command  of  Christ  to  his  disci- 
ples, to  'preach  thejorgiveness  of  sins  to  all  nations,  begin- 
7iing  at  Jenisaltm.     And,  that  no  penitent  may  be  discour- 
aged on  the  consideration  of  his  personal  unworthiness,  or  the 
aggravations  of  his  former  sins,  the  invitation  is  extended  to 
all  men,  in  terms  the  most  universal. — Come  unto  me,  all  ye 
who  labor  and  are  heavy  laden,  and,  I  will  give  you  rest, — 
Him  that  cometh  to  me  I  will,  in  no  wlscj  cast  out. 


M» 


On  this  subject  an  injudicious  controversy  has  been  raised 
on  the  following  question,  as  men,  like  gladiators,  to  shew  their 
intellectual  siiill,  are  often  prone  to  contention  on  the  slightest 
occasion  of  difference  ;  whether  Christ  has  died  for  all  men? 
or  only  for  an  elected  number  ?  Those  who  arrange  them- 
selves in  the  ranks  of  the  latter  insist  that,  if,  on  the  princi- 
ples of  their  antagonists,  we  say  that  Christ  has  died/orall 
men,  we  make  his  death  in  vain  to  the  greater  number  of 
those  for  whom  it  was  offered.  The  former,  with,  perhaps, 
greater  justice,  affirm,  that,  if  he  hath  died  only  for  a  select- 
ed number,  the  rest  of  mankind  are  necessarily  excluded 
from  the  possibility  of  salvation,  and,  therefore  the  offer  of 
the  gospel  to  them  is  impiously  imputing  to  God  a  duplicity 
in  his  transactions  with  the  weakness  of  human  nature,  so 
much  the  more  unworthy  of  his  infinite  goodness  that  it  would 
be  insulting  the  miserable,  with  ostensible  but  fallacious  offers 
of  mercy.  Neither  of  these  parties  intend  the  consequences 
imputed  to  them  by  their  rivals,  and  which  their  own  terms 
literally  taken,  seem  to  imply.  The  forms  of  expression,  on 
both  sides,  are  imperfectly  calculated  to  convey  accurate  con- 
ceptions of  their  respective  principles.  And  it  would  be  more 
consistent  with  the  spirit  of  the  gospel,  and  wilh  common 
sense,  and,  probably,  with  their  own  intentions  to  say,  that 
the  death  of  Christ  was  designed  generally  to  make  atone- 
ment/or sin  to  the  justice  of  God,  so  that  God  might  be  jusfy 
and  the  justifier  of  him  that  believeih,  and  that  an  indiscrimi- 
sate  offer  of  pardon  to  sinners  might  be  fairly  and  ingenuously 


founded  upon  bis  death. — And  fhis  mode  of  expression  is 

Ihe  more  reasonable,  because  the  same  merit  in  the  sacrifice 
whic  .  is  sufficient  for  the  expiation  of  one  ofifence,  is  suffi- 
cient for  the  offences  of  the  whole  race.  And  the  secret 
counsels  of  God,  which  are  inscrutable,  ought,  in  no  case,  to 
influence  the  duty  of  men. 

3.    OF  THE  PROMISE  OF  THE  SPIRIT  OF  SANCTIFICATION. 

The  forgiveness  of  sin  lays  a  foundation  for  access  to  God, 
and  communion  with  him  by  the  spirit  of  devotion.  Under 
the  dispensation  of  the  New  Covenant,  the  whole  system  of 
nature,  and  of  providence  is  subjected  to  the  directing  power 
of  Ihe  Holy  Spirit  by  Jesus  Christ,  in  subserviency  to  the 
great  ends  of  the  moral,  and  spiritual  world.  And  that  celes- 
tial influence  which  was  first  employed  to  convince  the  soul 
ofsiUf  of  righleousnesSy  and  of  jiidgmentf  is  now  imparted 
to  the  believer  to  assist  the  renovation  of  his  nature — to  con- 
firm and  increase  his  habits  of  holiness— to  enable  him  to 
discharge  all  his  duties  with  a  proper  temper  of  mind— and 
to  ripen  his  qualifications  for  the  kingdom  of  Heaven*  Al- 
most innumerable  are  the  particular  promises  to  this  effect, 
included  under  the  general  title  of  the  Covenant  in  the  sacred 
writings.  "Behold,  ihe  days  come,  saith  the  Lord,  that  I 
will 'make  a  new  covenant  with  the  house  of  Israel,  and  the 
house  of  Judah.  And  this  is  the  covenant  that  I  wifl  make; 
I  will  put  my  law  in  their  inward  parts,  and  write  it  in  their 


365 

hearts ;  and  I  will  be  tbeir  God,  and  they  shall  be  my  peo- 
ple," Jer.  xxxi.  31,  33.  And  in  Ezek.  xxxvi.  25. 2r,  *'  Then 
will  I  sprinkle  clean  water  upon  you,  and  you  shall  be  clean. 
From  all  your  filthiness,  and  from  all  your  idols  will  I  cleanse 
you.  A  new  heart  also  will  I  give  you,  and  a  new  spirit  will 
I  put  within  you :  and  I  will  take  away  the  stony  heart  out 
of  your  flesh,  and  I  will  give  you  an  heart  of  flesh."  But, 
it  is  the  constant  testimony  of  the  holy  scriptures,  not  only 
that  repentance  and  laith,  but  that  every  pious  disposition  in 
the  believer  proceeds  from  the  operation  of  the  Holy  Spirit. 
Therefore  it  is,  that  all  the  graces  of  the  christian  life  are  de- 
nominated the  fruits  of  the  Spirit* 

The  chief  question  which  remains  on  this  part  of  the  sub- 
ject, and  which,  indeed,  affects  the  whole  doctrine  of  the 
agency  of  the  Spirit,  is,  whether  at  any  time  he  operates  by 
immediate  influx  on  the  heart,  as  in  creation,  independently 
of  the  divine  word,  the  ordinances  of  the  church,  or  those 
means  continually  occurring  in  the  course  of  providence,  or 
in  the  transient  reflexions,  and  glancings  of  the  mind,  calculat- 
ed to  awaken  pious  thought,  to  inflame  holy  desire,  or 
touch  the  devout  sensibilities  of  the  soul .'  or  whether  he 
does  not  always,  and  exclusivel}^,  operate  by  those  scriptural, 
rational,  natural,  or  appointed  means  of  instruction  and  grace, 
or  those  secret  suggestions  arising  out  of  them,  which  are  fit- 
ted to  inform  the  reason,  and  aflect  the  heart  ?  I  am  dis- 
posed to  believe  that  he  always  works  by  natural  means,  and 


366 

never,  in  the  ordinary  exercises  of  the  christian  life,  by  im- 
mediate impulse,  or  direct  influx,  without  them.  The  doc- 
trine, or  fancy  of  immediate  and  direct  or  independent  influx 
is  liable  to  great  abuse  ;  especially  in  men  of  a  vivid  imagina- 
tion, and  morbid  sensibility,  or  of  a  gloomy  complexion  of 
soul,  who  are  subject,  in  consequence,  to  frequent,  strong, 
and  irregular  impressions.  And  when  ignorance,  or  inatten- 
tion cannot  trace  the  origin  of  their  thoughts,  or  assign  the 
causes  often  secret  or  forgotten,  of  their  sudden  emotions, 
they  are  prone»  on  one  hand,  to  ascribe  them  to  the  influences 
of  the  Holy  Spirit,  or,  on  the  other,  to  the  suggestions  of  in- 
fernal agency.  Hence  we  see  naen  often  disturbed  by  super- 
stitious terrors,  or  enthusiastic  visions.  One  of  the  most 
common  and  injurious  effects  of  this  tendency  of  mind  in  per- 
son:- f  weak  judgments,  and  warm  sensibilities,  is  a  prone- 
ness  to  decide  on  their  spiritual  state  entirely  by  momentary 
feelings,  instead  of  the  general  tenor  of  their  aflfections,  and 
their  lives,  compared  with  the  only  standard  of  truth  in  the 
word  of  God.  "  To  the  law,  and  to  the  testimony,  if  they  speak 
not  according  to  these,  it  is  because  there  is  no  light  in 
them."  On  the  subject,  on  which  1  have  been  speaking,  there 
is  a  strong  analogy  between  the  natural,  and  the  spiritual 
world. — In  the  former,  all  its  movements,  the  case  of  mira- 
cles only  excepted,  proceed,  uniformly,  according  to  the  es- 
tablished laws  of  nature  ;  in  the  latter,  its  laws  operate  with 
equal  certainty,  under  the  guidance  of  the  Holy  Spirit. 
There  arc  no  devious  movements,  no  eccentric  impulses 


3«r 

which  start  aside  from  this  order,  according  to  the  dreams  of 
enthusiasts  ;  and  although  we  cannot  always  trace  the  fine 
relations  of  actions  with  their  motives,  of  ends  with  the  means 
which  lead  to  them,  yety  in  every  case  the  moral  means  are 
intimately  conjoined  with  their  proper  end.  And,  in  no  in- 
stance, does  the  Holy  Spirit,  more  than  the  Sovereign  Au- 
thor of  nature,  act  upon  the  human  mind,  or  produce  any  ef- 
fect independently  of  the  means  naturally  connected  wilh  it, 
and  fitted  in  the  moral  structure  of  the  universe  to  influence 
its  movements. 

4.    OF  THE    PROMISE  OF    THE  FAVOUR  OF  GOD,    AND  ITS 
HAPPY  FRUITS  IN   THIS  LIFE. 

In  the  series  of  promises  entering  into  this  gracious  trans- 
action, I  have  mentioned,  in  the  next  place,  the  favour  of 
God,  with  all  its  happy  fruits  in  the  present  life ;  including 
the  constant  protection  and  care  of  his  holy  providence  over 
those  who  place  their  undivided  trust  in  him,  and  his  bene- 
diction upon  them  as  his  children  and  people  in  covenant.  I 
shall  not  proceed  to  particular  details  under  this  promise  • 
they  will  be  obvious  to  those  immediately  concerned  in  its 
accomplishment ;  it  will  be  sufficient  to  refer  the  serious  mind 
to  the  general  grounds  of  the  believer's  confidence.  "  Where- 
fore, come  out  from  among  them  and  be  ye  separate;  and  I 
will  be  a  father  unto  you,  and  ye  shall  be  my  sons  and  daugh- 
ters, saith  the  Lord  Almighty," — 2  Cor.  vi.  17.  Here  is  the 
sure  foundation  of  their  support  under  the  various  afflictions 


368 

of  lil'e  ana  the  stedfast  ground  of  (heir  hope  that,  in  the  issue, 
all  their  trials  will  be  rendered  blessings  to  them,  and  be  sanc- 
tified to  their  use.  "  All  things  shall  work  together  for  good 
to  them  that  love  God,  to  them  who  are  the  called,  accord- 
ing to  his  purpose.  For  all  things  arc  yours,  whether  Paul, 
or  Apollos,  or  Cephas,  or  the  world,  or  life,  or  death,  or 
things  present  or  things  to  come  ;  all  are  your's,  and  you  arc 
Christ's,  and  Christ  is  God's." 

5.    OF  THE  FINAL  BLESSING  AND  PROMISE  OF  THE 
COVENANT. 

The  conclusion  and  consummation  of  all  the  gracious  pur- 
poses of  God,  secured  by  the  New  Covenant,  to  his  believ- 
ing and  obedient  children,  is  eternal  life.  It  is  the  peculiar 
glory  of  the  gospel  that,  in  it,  life  and  iwmortaliiy  are 
brought  to  light  to  those  who,  by  their  relation  to  their  ori- 
ginal parent,  were  the  hopeless  heirs  of  death.  It  is  impos- 
sible to  know  what  would  have  been  the  felicity  of  life,  or  the 
perfection  to  which  human  nature  would  have  attained  in  it, 
in  consequence  of  the  obedience  of  Adam.  But  it  is  justly 
to  be  presumed  that  the  immortality  obtained  by  Christ,  for 
all  who  are  redeemed  from  the  earth  by  his  blood,  exalts  the 
believer  to  a  m^ch  higher  degree  of  glory  and  of  happiness. 
For,  "when  he  shall  appear,  we  shall  be  like  him,  for  we 
shall  see  him  as  he  is  ;  this  corruptible  shall  put  on  incorrup- 
lion,  and  this  mortal  shall  put  on  immortality," 


^69 

Having  thus  shortly  unfolded  this  comprehensive  concate- 
nation  of  promises  constituting  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  it  may 
perhaps  be  demanded,  if  it  be  useful  in  the  public  instruc- 
tions of  the  church,  to  observe  this  order  of  arrangement  ?«— 
I  regard  it,  certainly  as  not  without  its  bene6t,  for  the  clear- 
er illustration  of  the  gracious  system  of  the  gospel ;  and  for 
communicating  precision  and  distinctness  to  the  conceptions 
of  the  christian  in  contemplating  that  institution  of  mercy  un- 
der which  we  now  exist.     It  is  that  order  in  which  its  bles- 
sings naturally  offer  themselves  to  the  heart  of  the  believer 
for  the  encouragement  and  consolation  of  his  faith,  and  to  the 
mind  of  the  convinced  sinner,  to  invite  his  confidence  in  sup- 
plicating the  throne  of  grace  for  the  pardon  of  sin  ;  and  to 
confirm  his  trust  in  building  his  eternal  hopes  on  the  foundaw 
tion  of  Christ.     Under  the  deep  sense  of  his  misery,  and  of 
the  utter  impotence  of  nature  to  impart  any  relief  to  his  trou- 
bled mind,  the  promise  of  the  Saviour  must  yield  his  first 
consolation,  and  offer  his  first  refuge.     Under  the  convic- 
tions of  guilt,  and  of  the  just  displeasure  of  Almighty  God 
the  promise  of  the  free  and  full  forgiveness  of  sin,  nnist  first 
administer  peace  to  his  anxious  thoughts.     And  when  per- 
suaded to  embrace  the  gospel  in  faith,  he  will  experience  the 
necessity  of  having  continual  recourse  to  the  promises  and 
aids  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  for  the  sanctification  of  his  nature, 
and   his  growth  in  grace.     Without  this  precious  resource, 
he  would  find  himself  too  weak  to  contend  against  the  cor- 
ruptions of  his  heart,  and  the  seductions  of  the  world.     In 

4r 


370 

ihe  progress  of  the  divine  life  be  will  experience  the  benefit 
of  continiially  resorting  to  the  promises  of  the  covenant  for 
his  encouragement  in  duty,  his  comfort  in  trials,  and,  at 
length,  his  support  in  the  great  conflict  of  death.  Finally, 
in  the  promise  of  eternal  life  we  behold  the  glorious  reward 
of  his  faithful  labours,  and  the  blessed  consummation  of  all 
his- pious  hopes.  In  this  order,  therefore,  a  sincere  belifever 
will  most  reasonably  be  led  to  contemplate  the  precious  pro- 
mises of  the  new  covenant. 

OF  THE  CONDITION  OF  THE  COVENANT  OF  GRACE. 

Having  treated  of  the  constituent  promises  of  the  cove- 
jiant,  it  falls  next  in  order  to  state  its  conditions.  Those  who 
confound  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  and  the  Covenant  of  Re- 
demption,  pronounce  the  righteousness  of  Christ  to  be  its  sole 
and  exclusive  condition.  And  if  we  inquire  after  the  meri- 
torious tiile  of  the  redeemed  sinner  to  eternal  life,  it  is,  be- 
yond all  questicn,  to  be  found  only  in  the  Redeemer's  right- 
eousness. Those,  on  the  other  hand,  who  adopt  the  princi- 
ple— that  the  covenant  is  made  with  the  believer  through 
Christ,  affirm  that /ai7/i  is  its  proper  condition  ; — th^t  is,  hk 
explicit  acceptance  of  the  gracious  propositions  of  the  cove- 
nant, with  full  understanding  and  heaKy  acquiescence  in  their 
terms.  This  sincere,  intelligent,  and  affectionate  act  of  the 
soul,  gives  him,  according  to  the  promise,  an  interest  in  the 
merits  of  the  Redeemer,  and  lays  the  foundation  of  that  holi^ 


371 

iiess  of  heart  which  introduces  hioi  to  the  possession,  and 
qualifies  him  for  the  enjoyment  of  eternal  life. 

A  proper  decision  on  this  subject  depends,  in  a  great  de- 
gree, on  the  implication  of  the  term  condition.     If  it  intend 
any  act  of  obedience  on  the  merit  of- which  the  blessing  is 
bestowed,  it  is  evident  that  the  believer  possessing  no  such 
merit   in   himself,   and   the  covenant,    in    relation   to   him, 
being  wholly  of  grace,  it  must,  in  this  view  of  it,  be  without 
any  condition,  there  can  be  no  covenant  with  the  believer. 
But  if,  by  this  term,  be  intended  the  qualifications  which 
prepare  the  soul  to  receive  and  enjoy  the  ultimate  blessings 
of  this  most  gracious  institution,  and  in  consequence  of  which 
the  blessing  is  received  through  Christ ;  it  comprehends  all 
the  virtues  and  graces  of  the  divine  life,  springing  from  faith 
as  their  root.     With  strict  propriety,  indeed,  they  cannot  be 
denominated  conditions  of  the  covenant ;    but  ought  justly 
to  be  ranked  among  its  promised  blessings.     They  are  the 
gifts  of  God  through  the  Spirit. 

Ih  order  to  give  to  this  subject  as  much  simplicity  and 
plainness  as  possible,  agreeably  to  the  system  hitherto  pur- 
sued, it  is  necessary  to  bear  in  mind,  what  has  been  before 
suggested,  that  the  new  covenant  is  to  be  ranged  under  that 
species  of  contracts  whieh  are  denominated  gratuitous.  In 
this  class  the  condition  requires  only  the  explicit  acceptance 
of  the  favour,  with  proper  dispositions,  and  a  hearty  acqui- 


3/2 

escence  in  the  object,  and  concurrence  in  the  designs  of  tlie 
benefactor. 

« 
The  dispositions,  then,  with  which  we  ought  to  receive 
the  blessings  of  the  covenant  arise  out  of  a  just  sense  of  the 
wants,   imperfections  and  miseries  of  our  natural  state,  for 
which  the  covenant  is  designed  to  provide  a  gracious  reme- 
dy, and  a  due  appreciation  of  the  inGoite  mercy  of  God, 
through  Christ.     A  profound  conviction  of  sin  serves  to  ex- 
alt the  condescension,  and  grace  of  God  in  this  great  salva- 
tion.    And  a  pious,  and  believing  estimate  of  the  freeness,  the 
richness,  and  completeness  of  the  redemption  that  is  in  Christ 
Jesus,  must  have  (he  effect  to  awaken  the  gratitude  of  the 
saint,  to  inflame  his  love,  and  to  produce  a  fervent  devotion  of 
heart  to  the  service  of  God.     Such  are  the  fruits  of  a  cordial 
reception  of  the  covenant ;  and  they  are  the  natural  offspring 
of  a  sincere  belief  in  the  gospel.    Faith  in  Christ  may,  there- 
fore, with  propriety,  be  esteemed  the  condition  of  this  cove- 
nant.    It  prepares  the  believer  to  accept  its  blessings  with 
proper  and  humble  dispositions.     And  this  is  the  testimony 
of  the  evangelists,  and  of  all  the  apostles — *'  thy  faith  hath 
saved  thee, — by  grace  ye  are  saved,  through  faith,  and  that 
not  of  }  ourselves,  it  is   the  gift  of  God."     The  mercy  of 
God  requires  only  a  willing  mind,  and  a  well  disposed  reci- 
pient to  bestow  on  it  all  the  plenitude  of  his  grace,  through 
Ihe  merits  of  the  ever  blessed  Redeemer. 


373 

Another  requisite  in  compacts  of  this  kind,  is  a  hearty  ac- 
quiescence in  the  object,  and  views  of  the  benefactor.  Of 
this  whole  dispensation  of  grace  then  the  acknowledged  ob- 
ject i3  the  restoration  of  human  nature  (o  its  lost  holiness,  as 
the  only  way  to  perfect  happiness,  and  to  immortal  life.  In 
the  desire  of  happiness  all  men  will  earnestly  concur,  but 
not  all,  of  a  happiness  through  sanctification  of  their  nature  ; 
the  acquiescence  of  the  heart  in  this  object,  implies  the  love 
of  universal  holiness.  Of  this  affection,  the  eflacient  princi- 
ple is  a  cordial  belief  in  the  gospel  of  our  salvation,  and  in 
Jesus  Christ,  the  great  sum  of  the  gospel.  Therefore,  in  this 
view  also,  faith  is  to  be  regarded  as  the  condition  of  the  cove- 
nant. But  it  must  ever  be  remembered  that  it  is  a  condition 
simply  of  qualification,  not  of  merit.  Merit  in  man  would  de- 
stroy the  idea  of  mercy  in  God.  How,  indeed,  can  our  be- 
lief of  the  most  pure  and  excellent  truths,  although  ultimately 
preparing  the  soul  for  her  heavenly  inheritance,  be  the 
ground  on  which  we  can  meritoriously  claim  the  possession  of 
the  blessing  ?  Faith,  therefore,  is  only  the  gracious  condi- 
tion of  a  most  gracious  covenant. 


OV 

SANCTIFICATION 


The  principle  which  next  claims  our  attention  is  the  saiic- 
lification  of  our  fallen  nature,  and  its  continual  advancement 
In  the  habits  of  the  divine  life.  Sanctification  is  an  effect  of 
the  gracious  operation  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  enlightening  the 
mind  in  the  knowledge  of  divine  truth,  and  deeply  affecting 
the  heart  with  the  perception,  and  love  of  divine  things.  It 
is  begun  in  regeneration,  and  advances  constantly  and  often 
almost  imperceptibly,  in  the  stsdfastness  of  italirliious  prin- 
ciples, and  the  strength  of  its  holy  afTeclions,  till  it  attains 
at  length  the  consummation  of  holiness  in  the  kingdom  of 
heaven. 

The  principal  questions  arising  on  this  subject  respect — 
the  nature  of  the  change  effected  in  regeneration- — the  agen- 
cy of  the  Holy  Spirit  in  producing  this  change — the  means 
of  cultivating  genuine  sanctity  of  heart — and  lastly,  the  obli- 
gation of  practical  holiness,  which  is  not  superseded  but  \n- 
"-^reased  by  the  doctrine  of  salvation  by  free  grace. 


'^TQ 


Ob'  REGENERATION. 


Regeneration  is  a  term  entirely  of  figurative  meaning,  and 
ba3  respect  to  the  new  principles  of  life  and  action  introduc- 
ed into  the  soul  by  the  faith  of  the  gospel.  The  same  term 
was  anciently  employed  by  the  schools  of  philosophy,  to  in- 
dicate the  change  produced  on  ignorance,  and  vice  in  their 
pupils  by  the  force  of  instruction,  and  the  well  conducted 
influence  of  education.  The  man  becomes,  in  a  great  mea- 
sure, a  new  man,  through  the  illumination  of  his  understand- 
ing, the  correction  of  his  passions,  the  regulation  of  his  af- 
fections, and  the  amelioration  of  all  his  principles  of  action. 
In  the  school  of  Christ  it  assumes  a  purer  and  sublimer  mean- 
ing, and  designates  that  new  and  spiritual  state  of  life  to 
which  the  believer  is  introduced  by  the  doctrines,  and  the 
spirit  of  his  Saviour.  It  is  distinguished  by  new  feelings, 
new  ideas,  new  dispositions,  tendencies,  and  habits  of  the 
soul.  The  heart,  which  had  existed  like  the  embryo  be- 
fore birth,  in  a  state  of  darkness  and  blindness,  only  feebly 
warmed  with  the  principles  of  life,  now  emerges  into  light. 
The  world  presents  to  it  a  new  face — the  heavens  disclose 
wonders  of  creating  power  which  it  had  never  discerned — it 
feels  itself  a  new  being.  This  change,  in  its  immediate  effects, 
consists  in  a  just  discernment  of  the  moral  glories  and  per- 
fections of  the  supreme,  self  existent,  and  omnipresent  Je- 
hovah ;  in  a  profound  abhorrence  of  sin ;  in  a  strong  and 


S77 
lively  perception  of  the  beauty  of  holiness;  In  an  ardent  tie 
votion  and  obedience  (o  its  laws;   in  an  overwhelming  sense 
of  gratitude  for  the  mercies  of  redemption ;  and,  under  the 
deep  and  atTecting  impressions  of  the  whole,  in  a  warm,  ex- 
tended, and  increasing  benevolence  to  mankind. 

J^  THE  AUTHOR  OF  REGENERATIOrf. 

The  holy  scriptures  in  speaking  of  this  blessed  change^ 
ever  represent  the  Holy  Spirit  as  its  immediate  Author,  by 
his  illuminating  influence  on  the  understanding,  and  the  heart. 
A  peculiar  clearness  of  perception,  is  imparted  to  the  be- 
liever's apprehension  of  divine  things,  and  all  the  moral  sen- 
sations of  the  soul,  if  this  language  may  be  employed,  are 
exalted  to  a  much  higher  tone  of  sensibilily.  In  this  under- 
standing the  mind  is  enlightened,  not  so  much  through  the 
intellect,  as  the  heart ;  but  in  the  whole  there  is  an  ineffa- 
ble perception  of  divine  truth,  in  proportion  to  the  natu- 
ral  vigour  of  the  mind,  combined  with  a  warmth  and  glow 
of  devout  affection  unknown  to  the  natural  man.  They 
mutually  communicate  their  light  and  heat,  till  the  whole  sou! 
is  dissolved  in  an  enlightened  and  holy  love.  Human  culti- 
vation is  capable  of  accomplishing  much  in  the  amelioration 
of  the  manners  and  dispositions  of  the  young ;  so  that  every 
good  man,  beholding  them  with  the  eyes  with  which  our 
Saviour  regarded  the  amiable  youth  in  the  gospel,  shall  love 
them ;  but  it  is  utterly  incompetent  to  producing  that  mighty 


3T8 

moral  change  implied  in  rcgeneralion.  The  most  ingenious 
powers  ot  huaian  nature,  raised  to  their  highest  refinement 
by  the  force  of  the  most  judicious  culture,  still  fall  far  short 
of  the  genuine  charily  of  the  gospel.  "  That  which  is  born 
of  the  flesh,  saith  our  Saviour,  "is  flesh;  but  that  which 
is  born  of  llie  spirit  is  spirit.  Marvel  not  that  1  said  unto 
you,  you  must  be  born  again."  And  the  apostle  Peter  pro- 
nounces believers  "elect,  according  to  the  foreknowledge 
of  God  the  Father,  and  sanctification  of  the  Spirit."  St. 
Paul  also  uses  the  following  impressive  language — "  but  ye 
are  sanctified,  but  ye  are  justified,  in  the  name  of  the  Lord 
Jesus,  and  by  the  Spirit  of  our  God."  The  Spirit  of  God 
is  indeed  the  primary  and  effectual  agent  in  the  regeneration 
of  the  soul ;  not  properly  by  a  creative  act,  or  any  immediate 
operation  exerted  upon  it  independent  of  the  appointed 
means  of  grace,  as  the  language  of  some  writers  would  lead 
us  to  conceive ;  but  by  means,  which,  under  his  influence 
and  direction,  are  peculiarly  adapted  to  the  end  ;  especially 
by  his  holy  word,  and  the  instituted  ordinances  of  his  grace. 
The  Holy  Spirit,  in  the  ordinary  government  of  the  church, 
never  works,  except  by  the  instrumentality  and  co-action  of 
instructions,  or  providential  dispensations  which  are  natural- 
ly calculated,  in  the  moral  structure  of  our  nature,  to  inform 
the  reason,  and  to  touch  the  heart.  For  this  purpose,  he 
has  instituted  the  reading  and  preaching  of  his  word,  the  ad- 
ministration of  his  most  holy  sacraments,  and  the  habitual 
use  of  humble  and  fervent  prayer  to  the  Father  of  all  mercy 
a;ij  grace  ;  and,  in  subserviency  to  the  same  design,  he  di- 


3r9 

rects  Ihe  movements  of  his  almigbty  providence  over  the 
world. 

TWO  ERRORS  ON  THIS  SUBJECT. 

Two  errors  exist  on  this  subject,  equally  distant  from  the 
truth ;  one  which  ascribes  the  regeneration,  or  rather  as  they 
would  say  the  moral  cultivation  of  the  heart,  and  the  whole 
progress  of  our  improvement  in  virtue  and  sanctity  of  life, 
merely  to  the  reasonings  and  reflections  of  our  own  minds, 
aided,  perhaps,  by  the  word  of  Godo  And  supposes  the 
moral  eiTects  which,  in  iioly  scripture,  are  ascribed  to  the 
Divine  Spirit,  to  be  attributed  to  him,  solely,  because  he 
has  illuminated  the  understandings  of  the  sacred  writers,  and 
dictated  to  them  those  truths  intended  to  enlighten,  and  re- 
form the  world.  Whence,  by  a  natural  and  common  figure 
of  speech,  the  Author  is  substituted  in  the  place  of  his 
work. 

The  other  is  to  impute  so  much  to  the  immediate,  and  ex- 
clusive operation  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  that  the  instrumentali- 
ty of  the  word,  or,  indeed,  of  any  of  the  ordinary  means 
of  grace,  seems  to  be,  in  a  great  measure,  superseded* 
Their  language  conveys  this  idea,  that  the  change  upon  the 
soul  is  strictly  an  act  of  creation,  which  is  necessary  to  pass 
upon  the  state  and  dispositions  of  the  heart,  before  the  mo- 
tives of  the  gospel  can  have  any  operative  and  sanctifying 


^8(1 

iotiliience  upon  it.  To  support  this  principle  they  mainfaio 
that  the  p^aciiciii  motives  of  duty  arising  out  of  the  system 
of  divine  trutli  cannot  be  discerned  in  their  proper  nature, 
and  their  spiritual  beauty,  and  must  consequently  remain  in- 
operative, till  the  heart  is  assimilated  by  the  power  of  God, 
to  the  spirit  of  the  gospel.  For  motives  drawn  from  the 
beauty  of  holiness  cannot  touch  (he  soul  till  its  native  dark- 
ness, and  defect  of  a  divine  taste  be  removed.  Can  an  eye 
whicli  is  obscured  by  a  film,  they  demand,  discern  the  light 
which  shines  around  it,  till  the  cause  which  obstructs  its  vi- 
sion be  taken  out  of  the  way  ?  Can  the  heart  perceive  the 
truths  of  the  gospel  in  their  holy  nature,  and  feel  them  in  their 
divine  effiacy,  till  its  inherent  depravity  be  changed  ? — Illus- 
trations drawn  from  material  analogies  seldom  apply  wilh  en- 
tire accuracy  to  spiritual  subjects  ;  and  then,  by  pursuing  the 
resemblance  too  minutely,  they  tend  only  to  mislead.  In  the 
present  instance,  the  effect  is,  obviously,  made  to  precede 
the  cause.  In  the  moral  changes  of  the  heart,  the  blindness 
which  hinders  its  discernment  of  the  light  of  divine  truth  is 
cured  by  the  light  itself.  As  in  cultivating  a  taste  for  the 
beauties  of  science  and  the  arts,  or  the  moral  tastes  of  virtue, 
the  mind,  however  obscured  by  ignorance  or  error  at  first,  is 
gradually  improved  and  approaches  ultimately  intellectual 
perfection  by  presenting  to  it  the  most  beautiful  objects  in 
the  arts,  and  suggesting  continually  only  the  justest  maxims 
of  scientific  truth.  The  analogy  in  this  case  is  infinitely  more 
exact  than  in  the  former.     Spiritual  darkness  is  cured  by  the 


881 

spiritual  light,  as  addressed  to  the  soul  by  that  heavenly 
teacher,  the  Holy  Spirit  of  truth.  Powers  still  reside  in  reason 
and  conscience,  notwithstanding  the  deep  corruption  of  the  fall, 
capable  of  discerning  in  a  degree,  though  it  were  as  the  twilight 
before  the  dawn,  the  illumination  of  divine  truth  shining  around 
them  in  the  word  of  God,  which  may  be  perceived  by  every 
diligent  inquirer  through  the  concurrent  aids  of  the  Holy  Spir- 
it, which  are  now,  by  the  grace  of  Christ,  universally  diflfus- 
ed  in  the  church.  For  as  miracles  exist,  at  present,  in  the 
spiritual  more  than  in  the  natural  order  of  things.  The  sparks 
of  light  will,  at  first  indeed,  be  small  and  feeble,  but  each  ad- 
vance renders  them  susceptible  of  still  farther  increase,  til! 
they  become  the  principle  of  a  new  life. 

What  is  the  peculiar  nature  of  the  agency  of  the  divine 
Spirit,  distinct  from,  and  superior  to  the  ordinary  influence 
of  education  ;  or  what  is  his  internal  operation  on  the  mind 
must,  like  all  the  works  of  God,  be  inscrutable.  But  the  re- 
ality of  his  concurrent  influence  in  illuminating  the  under- 
standing, in  rectifying  the  action  of  the  will,  in  regenerating 
and  sanctifying  the  heart,  are  truths  most  explicitly  taught 
in  the  holy  scriptures.  The  agency  of  this  divine  principle 
in  the  moral  world,  bears  a  resemblance  to  the  operations  of 
providential  agency  in  the  system  of  nature :  being  in  all 
things,  perfectly  concurrent  with  the  established  laws  of  ma- 
terial action  in  the  universe.  The  movements  of  the  Spirit 
of  God,  where  no  miracle  ia  intended,  arc  ever  conducted 


a82 

according  to  the  laws  of  tbe  ralional  system,  the  laws  of  hu- 
man liberty,  and  the  moral  laws  of  the  heart.  In  accom- 
plishing the  regeneration  of  the  believer,  the  blessed  Spirit  is 
able,  bj  the  finest  lights,  imperceptibly  to  instruct  the  intel- 
lect in  divine  things— by  the  finest  insinuations,  secretly  to 
touch  the  heart ;  but  there  is,  in  no  instance,  any  violation  of 
the  laws  of  the  moral  world.  Nor  is  there  any  end  accom- 
plished, even  in  the  regeneration  and  sanctification  of  the 
soul,  except  by  means  which,  under  his  most  wise  and  holy 
direction,  naturally  contribute  to  produce  the  effect.  In 
moral  effects,  the  means  are  instruction,  and  correction  ;  in- 
struction by  the  word  of  God,  and  correction  by  the  power 
of  conscience,  assisted  by  the  dispensations  of  divine  provi- 
dence. And  one  office  of  the  Holy  Spirit  seems  to  be  to 
assemble  and  combine  those  various  means  in  the  way  best 
adapted  to  subserve  the  gracious  and  sovereign  designs  of 
Heaven,  with  regard  to  the  spiritual  and  eternal  state  of  each 
{fldiyidual. 

SANCTIFICATION  IN  THIS  LIFE  IN  A  STATE  OF  PROGRES- 
SIVE IMPROVEMENT. 

The  sanctification  of  the  believer  commences  in  regenera- 
tion ;  but,  through  the  whole  of  the  present  life,  is  continued 
in  a  condition  of  gradual  approximation  towards  a  state  of  per- 
fect holiness.  Some  christians  use  a  language  upon  this  sub- 
ject, which,  I  must  ^charitably  presume,  does  not  express 


383 

their  cenuine  sentiments ;    as  if  the  behever  may  attain  a 
state  of  perfect  holiness,  while  residing  in  this  world  of  ne- 
cessary imperfection.     The  principles  of  corruption  are  so 
deeply   rooted  in  our  nature,  that  they  never  can  be  com- 
pletely eradicated.     While  we  remain  in  the  garden  of  God 
upon  earth,  a  corrupted  stock  must  still  send  forth  degenerate 
scions.     Giadually   to  be  subduing  them  without  arriving'' 
at  complete   victory   over  their  luxuriant  growth,  is  the  ut- 
most that  the  humble  christian  can  hope.     And  the  condi- 
tion of  the  real  disciple  in  the  present  life,  is  only  a  condi- 
tion of  constant  and  progressive  improvement.     Grow  in, 
grace,  sailh  the  apostle,  and  in  the  knowledge  of  our  Lord 
and  Saviour  Jesus  Christ.     That  there  are  always  many 
defects  mixed  with  the  virtues  and  graces  of  the  most  emi- 
nent saints,  is  manifest  from  the  whole  tenor  of  the  sacred 
writings  ;    and   appears   continually  in   the  confessions,  and 
records  of  the  experience  of  the  saints.    "  There  is  not  a  just 
man  upon  earth,  that  doelh  good  and  sinneth  not.     In  many 
things,  we  all  offend."     And  the  most  devout  and  affection- 
ale  of  the  whole  college  of  the  disciples  pronounces — If  we 
say  we  have  no  sin^  we  deceive  ourselves,  and  the  truth  is 
not  in  us. 

At  the  first  view,  this  idea  seems  to  contradict  the  language 
of  our  symbols  which  assert  that  the  believer  is  renewed  in 
the  whole  man^  after  the  ima^e  of  God.  But  between  these 
propositions,  when  righlly  explamed,  there  is  no  opposition. 


384 

This  symbolic  language,  far  from  signifying  (he  holy  perfec- 
tion of  the  believer,  simply  implies  that  the  predominant  ac- 
tion of  the  powers  of  human  nature  in  him  is  habitually  di- 
rected  by  the  principles  of  the  gospel ;  and  the  supreme  aim 
of  all  his  affeclions  is,  to  fulSl  the  will  of  his  Creator,  and  to 
advance  the  interests,  and  the  glory  of  his  Redeemer's  king- 
dom. The  flesh  may  lust  against  the  spirit ;  and,  in  some 
critical  circumstances  of  temptation,  the  principle  of  grace 
may  find  it  difficult  to  preserve  its  ascendency  against  the 
sinful  propensities  of  corrupted  nature.  But  wherever  the 
character  truly  exists,  there  will  be  found  also  the  predomi- 
nance of  the  habits  of  holiness.  Every  principle  of  nature, 
every  tendency  of  the  heart,  all  the  actions  of  the  life,  will, 
in  its  general  tenor  be  subject  to  the  commanding  influence 
of  the  spirit  of  divine  grace.  But,  according  to  the  temper- 
ament of  different  natures,  it  may  appear  in  some  in  a  highefy 
and  in  others  in  a  lower  tone  of  fervent  piety.  It  is  the  ha- 
bitual ascendency  of  the  principles  of  duty  which  character- 
izes that  state  of  holiness  which  may  be  called  the  renovation 
of  the  whole  man* 

THE  HOLINESS  OF  THE  BELIEVER  IMPERFECT  IN  THIS  LIFE, 

Some  christians  have  injudiciously  boasted  of  having  arriv- 
ed at  a  state  of  perfect  holiness.  And  a  few  expressions  in 
the  sacred  scriptures  are  appealed  to  as  justifying  this  arro- 
gant claim.     Noah  is  said  to  have  been  "  a  just  man,  and 


3,85 

p€rfect  in  bis  generation."  "  Be  ye  perfect,"  saith  Chrisf, "  as 
your  Father  who  is  in  heaven  is  perfect.  Whom  we  preach," 
saith  the  apostle,  "  that  we  may  present  every  man  perfect  in 
Clifist  Jesus."  "  Whosoever  is  born  of  God,"  sailh  John, 
"  doth  not  commit  sin,  for  his  seed  reraaineth  in  him,  and  he 
cannot  sin,  because  he  is  born  of  God," — John  iii.  9.  Many 
expressions  there  are  which  speak  a  similar  language.  But  it 
obviously  appears  from  their  whole  strain,  and  the  connexions 
in  which  they  stand,  that  the  perfection  which  the  scriptures 
ascribe  to  believers,  implies  something  very  different  from  that 
state  of  holiness  which  is  exempted  from  all  sin,  error,  and 
frailty. — This  term  in  our  language,  as  well  as  the  correspond- 
ing terms  in  the  Greek  and  Hebrew,  has  obtained  a  figurative 
signification,  even  in  common  usage,  by  which  it  is  made  to  ex- 
press that  state  of  objects  in  which  they  possess  all  the  ne- 
cessary parts,  and  the  usual  properties  of  the  species  to  which 
they  belong.  We  say  of  a  child  which  is  complete  in  all  its 
limbs  and  organs,  that  it  is  a  perfect  child.  And  of  one  who 
Las  rendered  himself  competently  master  of  all  the  requisite 
branches  of  liberal  art  to  qualify  himself  for  public  life,  that 
his  education  is  perfect.  The  same  term  is  familiarly  appli- 
ed to  plants  and  animals,  and  generally,  as  already  indicated^ 
to  all  objects  which  possess  the  genuine  properties  of  their 
species. — If,  then,  we  suppose  the  dispositions,  affections,  and 
principles,  which  distinguish  sincere  believers,  to  form  the 
characteristics  of  a  moral  species,  that  state  of  the  soul  which 
'^Tnbraces  all  these  properties,  may  justly  be  styled  a  state  Cf 


386 

christian  perfection.  Tiiia  perhaps,  is  simply  the  idea  aa- 
nexed  to  that  form  of  expression  by  the  sacred  writers. 
The  christians  were  sometimes  pronounced  perfect  by  the 
apostles,  when,  with  unshaken  firmness  they  endured  labours, 
and  sufferings  in  the  cause  of  Christ,  in  allusion  to  the  athletiS 
among  the  Greeks,  from  whom  these  holy  writers  borrow  ma- 
ny images,  and  who  were  said  to  have  attained  perfection 
TeMiohlu,  in  their  discipline,  not  only  when  they  were  well 
practised  in  the  tactics  of  their  art ;  but,  especially,  when 
they  could  endure  fatigue,  and  pain  without  shrinking,  oc 
complaint.  Let  patience,  says  St.  James,  have  her  perfect 
work,  that  ye  may  he  perfect  and  entire. 

That  expressions  which,  in  their  literal  import,  signify 
perfection,  are  applied  to  diflferent  degrees  of  maturity  in  the 
divine  life,  and,  therefore,  cannot  be  intended  to  mark  it3 
consummation  in  the  present  world,  is  rendered  evident  by 
the  language  of  St.  Paul  himself:  for  that  great  apostle  pro- 
nounces concerning  his  own  state  and  experience*— "not  that 
I  have  already  apprehended,  either  am  already  perfect ;  but 
I  follow  after,  that  I  may  apprehend  that  for  which  also  I  am 
apprehended  by  Christ  Jesus."  This  declaration  by  St. 
Paul  must  be  the  annihilation  of  any  claim  to  absolute  per- 
fection in  other  believers.  And  I  unhesitatingly  add,  that 
the  experience  of  all  sincere  christians  contradicts  this  proud 
idea;  and  the  professions  of  a  few  weak  enthusiasts  to  the 
cenlrary,  who  are  little  capable  of  forming  a  judgment  of 


ihcir  own  liearts,  can  hardly  be  regarded  as  an  exception  (c 
the  general  conclusion. 

OF  THE  ORDINARY  MEANS  OF  SANCTIFICATION. 

The  Holy  Spirit  is  acknowledged  by  all  devout  and  ra- 
tional disciples  to  be  the  supreme  efficient  agent  in  the  re* 
generation  and  sanctification  of  Lis  people  :  but  as  he  acts 
only  through  means  instituted  by  God  himself,  it  is  a  prac- 
tical question  of  no  small  importance  to  every  christian,  io 
what  way  he  may  best  promote  the  holy  culture  of  the  heart, 
and  advance  in  the  habits  of  the  divine  life.  These  subjects 
are  so  constantly  illustrated  in  the  instructions  of  the  pulpit, 
and  enter  so  largely  into  the  scheme  of  all  the  practical  wri- 
ters on  religion,  that,  in  a  general  system  of  theological  doc- 
trine, they  require  only  to  be  briefly  suggested.  They  may 
be  embraced  under  the  following  heads  : — the  diligent  study 
of  the  holy  scriptures,  and  of  the  writings  of  wise  and  pious 
men,  designed  to  illustrate  and  enforce  their  sacred  truths*— 
fervent  prayer  to  the  Father  of  Spirits ;  frequent  and  pro- 
found meditation  on  divine  things  ;  pious  association,  and 
conference  with  judicious  christians;  faithful  attendance  on 
all  the  public  and  private  institutions  of  religion  ;  and  strength- 
ening, by  constant  exercise,  the  habits  of  a  holy  life. 


a$& 


THE  NECESSITr  OF  GOOD  WORKS  COK81STENT  WITH  THfii 
DOCTRINE  OF  SALVATION  BY  FREE  GRACE. 

Those  who  are  unfrlendlj  to  this  principle  demand — why 
fihould  good  works  be  required  of  the  believer,  if  it  be 
indeed  the  doctrine  of  the  holy  scriptures  that  salvation  is  of 
grace,  without  the  works  of  the  law  ?  In  order  to  answer 
this  inquiry  satisfaclorilj,  it  is  to  be  remembered  that  our 
salvation  consists  not  oi>lj  of  deliverance  from  the  curse  of 
the  violated  law,  which  is  effected  through  Christ,  paying 
the  forfeit,  or  bearing  the  punishment  of  our  sins,  and  is  ac* 
linowledged  to  be  purely  the  fruit  of  the  unmerited  mercy 
and  love  of  God  ;  but  of  the  restoration  of  the  holiness  and 
perfection,  and  consequently,  the  happiness  of  our  fallen  na- 
tCire.  The  latter  must,  in  a  nature  degenerate  and  corrupted 
like  that  of  man,  be  equally  with  the  former,  the  fruit  of  di- 
vine favour.  For  without  the  merciful  aids  of  the  Holy 
Spirit,  an  iaipure  nature  cannot  be  restored  ;  nor  without 
the  grace  of  holy  living,  can  either  its  perfection,  or  its  hap- 
piness be  rendered  complete.  The  sanctity  of  the  life, 
therefore,  manifested  by  its  good  works,  is  indispensably 
requisite  in  the  christian,  not,  indeed,  as  the  cause,  in  any 
degree,  of  his  salvation,  but  as  the  certain  indication  of 
his  nature  being  renewed,  sanctified,  and  restored  to  its 
original  moral  principles,  and  to  the  power  of  enjoying  its 
original  happiness.     This  is  the  proper  idea  of  Balvation, 


add 

Heaven  consists  less  in  local  silualiop,  tban  in  the  diBpos]- 
tions  of  the  soul  which  qualify  it  for  the  enjoyment  of  God, 
and  of  that  supreme  felicity  which  is  to  be  possessed  only 
in  his  immediate  presence.  And  these  dispositions  are, 
above  all  things,  to  be  cultivated  upon  earth  in  the  acts  and 
habits  of  a  holy  life,  in  the  prospect  of  our  future,  and  eter- 
nal existence. 

OF  THE   nOLINEBS  ANP  PERFECTION  OF  A  MORAL  AND  BE- 
LIGIOCS  ACT. 

It  is,  in  this  place,  perhaps,  proper  to  inquire  what  con- 
stitutes the  rectitude  of  a  moral  act,  and  procures  it  accep* 
(ance  with  God  ?  Every  morally  perfect  act  proceeds  ia 
the  first  place,  from  a  good  motive  ;  that  is,  from  the  desire 
of  glorifying  God,  or  of  promoting  the  happiness  of  man,  and 
from  both  these  intentions,  where  they  can  be  combined  ia 
the  same  action.  One  ruling  and  habitual  principle  governs 
the  whole  conduct,  and  presides  in  each  individual  act  of  a 
believer's  life  ; — I  mean  the  profound  sentiment  of  obedience 
to  God,  and  of  Gratitude  to  the  Redeemer  of  the  world, 
which  strengthens  and  animates  the  principle  of  every  par* 
ticular  duty.  The  next  requisite  is,  that  the  substance  of 
the  act  in  itself  be  good  ;  that  is,  calculated  to  promote  some 
proper,  useful,  or  benevolent  end  ;  embracing,  within  the 
range  of  these  objects,  the  glory  of  God,  and  the  felicity  of 
human  nature.     Which  condition  excludes,  of  consequence, 


390 

all  the  acts  of  a  fanatical  zeal,  or  a  gloomy  superstition,  which 
is  equally  the  sacrifice  of  human  happiness,  and  of  the  rights 
of  human  nature,  to  a  mistaken  rage  for  the  pretended  honour 
of  the  Deity,  or  glory  of  the  most  merciful  Saviour.  An- 
other requisite  to  constitute  an  action  good,  is,  that  the  form 
and  manner  of  it  be  also  right.  If  there  be  any  mode  pre- 
scribed by  the  laws  of  society  for  fulfilling  human  duties,  or 
of  God  for  fulfilling  those  that  are  divine,  it  becomes  a  chris- 
tian most  scrupulously  to  conform  to  the  instituted  rite.— 
There  is  some  fault  attached  even  to  the  worship  of  God,  if 
in  any  material  act,  it  contradicts,  or  departs  from  the  rules 
or  exaciples  of  holy  writ.  And,  above  all,  if  it  either  omits, 
or  adds  to  the  forms  prescribed  by  the  sacred  writers,  as  far 
as  they  are  explicitly  defined,  or  we  can,  by  the  faithful  ex- 
ercise of  our  own  reason,  discern  them.  If  there  be  no  form 
prescribed,  the  mode  which  we  adopt  should  be  such  as  we 
conscientiously  believe  will  best  subserve  every  valuable  pur- 
pose of  piety  ;  leaving  to  our  fellow  christians  the  equal  right 
of  judging  for  themselves.  The  last  requisite  is,  that  it  should 
stand  in  its  proper  place,  and  be  performed  in  its  proper  time, 
so  as  to  be  consistent  with  the  whole  system  of  our  duties, 
and  with  all  the  laws  of  prudence  and  propriety.  If  an  ac- 
tion be  defective  in  any  of  these  particulars,  it  is  in  the  same 
proportion  removed  from  perfection  as  an  act  of  virtue. 

Many  other  questions,  connected  with  this  subject,  but  of 
a  speculative  rather  than  practical  nature,  have  been  agitated 


by  different  writers,  which  it  would  be  unnecessarily  tedious 
to  discuss  in  this  place,  and  the  disquisition  of  which  is  of  the 
less  importance,  as  they  will  often  occur  in  the  course  of  your 
reading.  I  proceed,  therefore,  to  the  consideration  of  the 
last  blessing  usually  enumerated  by  Calvinistic  writers  as 
flowing,  in  this  life,  from  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  which  is 

THE  PERSEVERANCE  OF  THE   SAINTS. 

The  idea  annexed  to  this  principle  is,  that  those  who  have 
once  been  regenerated,  and  sanctified  by  the  Spirit  of  God^ 
shall  never  lose  the  seed  effectually  implanted  by  that  Di- 
vine Teacher,  but  be  able  always  to  preserve  it,  and  perse- 
vere in  the  discharge  of  every  duty  to  eternal  life,  amid&t 
partial  fluctuations,  however,  arising  from  the  imbecility  ct 
human  nature.  Many  writers  of  distinguished  naaie  in  the 
church  deny  this  doctrine  entirely.  For,  not  acknowledging 
the  predestinating  decrees  of  God,  and  ascribing  little  to  the 
extraordinary  influences  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  they  pronounce 
that  the  sanctity  of  the  believer,  like  every  moral  quality  in 
man,  must  partake  of  the  mutability  of  human  nature.  To 
render  the  perseverance  of  the  believer  certain,  they  affirm, 
requires  the  operation  of  some  necessary  cause  incompatible 
with  the  moral  freedom  of  the  mind.  This  objection  has  alrea- 
ready  been  considered,  and  obviated,  when  treating  of  the  de- 
crees of  God ;  when  it  was,  I  hope,  clearly  shewn  that  the 
iflfluence  of  the  Divine  Spirit  over  human  actions  may  be  ex- 


Si92 

erted,  so  us  to  attain  the  most  infallible  effects,  without  im- 
pairing, in  the  smalleBt  degree,  their  moral  freedom. 

The  follotFing,  therefore,  is  the  only  question  on  this  sub- 
ject, which  requires  your  careful  investigation,  and  which, 
with  regard  to  the  doctrine,  must  be  decisive.  Has  God 
given  to  the  believer,  in  his  holy  word,  such  direct  and  ex- 
plicit promises,  as  to  be  a  Sufficient  ground  of  trust,  that  he 
will  always  grant  him  such  a  measure  of  grace,  and  of  his 
holy  influence,  as  will  dispose  and  enable  him  to  continue 
faithful  till  death  ?  A  few,  even  of  Calvinistic  writers,  be- 
lieve that  the  holy  scriptures  do  not  contain  such  promises, 
but  that  the  grace  which  he  hath  bestowed  at  his  pleasure,  he 
may,  at  his  pleasure,  or  when  the  precious  gift  is  negligently 
improved,  withhold.  The  great  majority  of  these  writers, 
however,  think  it  reasonable  to  believe  that  Almighty  God 
doth  never  bestow  his  grace  in  vain,  but  that  the  seed 
tvhich  he  hath  once  implanted  he  will  cherish  to  perfection. 
Besides  the  apparent  reasonableness  of  this  opinion,  they 
support  the  principle  by  many  proofs  of  holy  writ  which, 
they  suppose,  do  either  directly,  or  by  necessary  implication, 
assert  it.  And  this,  indeed,  is  the  only  foundation  on  which 
it  can  safely  be  rested.  All  other  reasoning  is  mere  the- 
ory, and  must  depend  on  the  accuracy  with  which  principles 
are  laid  down,  and  conclusions  legitimately  drawn,  concern- 
ing which  the  minds  of  men  are  seldom  in  perfect  accord,-*^ 
The  fallowing  are  a  few  of  the  passages  which  always  have 


393 

been  quoted  on  this  occasion  ;  and  which  I  repeat  wllhouf 
comment,  as  being  more  than  sufficient,  I  presume,  to  sup- 
port the  general  truth,  in  the  mind  of  every  candid  interpreter 
of  scripture.  "  And  there  shall  arise  false  Christs,  and  false 
prophets,  and  shall  do  great  signs  and  wonders,  so  as  to  draw 
away,  if  it  were  possible,  even  the  elect,** — 31atL  xxiv.  24. 
"  This  is  the  will  of  my  Father  who  hath  sent  me,  that  of  all 
which  he  hath  given  me  I  should  lose  none ;  but  I  shall  raise 
it  up  at  the  last  day," — John  vi.  39.  "  And  I  give  to  them 
eternal  life,  and  they  shall  never  perish,  neither  shall  any 
pluck  them  out  of  my  hands.  My  Father  who  gave  them  to 
me  is  greater  than  all,  and  none  shall  pluck  them  oat  of  my 
Father's  hand,"— Jo/ui  x.  23,  29.  *'  For  we  know  that  to 
those  who  love  God,  all  things  work  together  for  good,  to 
those  who  are  the  called  according  to  his  purpose.  For 
whom  he  did  foreknow,  those  he  foreordained  to  be  con- 
formed to  the  image  of  his  Son,  that  he  should  be  the  first 
born  among  many  brethren.  For  whom  he  did  foreknow, 
those  he  also  called  ;  and  whom  he  called  those  he  also  jus- 
tified, and  whom  he  justified  those  he  also  glorified," — John 
viii.  28.. ..30.  «  Now  he  that  establisheth  us  with  you  in 
Christ,  and  hath  anointed  us  is  God  :  who  also  hath  sealed 
us,  and  given  us  the  earnest  of  the  Spirit  in  our  hearts," — 
2  Cor,  i.  21,  22.  "Grieve  not  the  Holy  Spirit  of  God 
whereby  ye  have  been  sealed  unto  the  day  of  redemption," — 
Eph,  iv.  30.     "  For  us  who  are  kept  by  the  power  of  God 

through  faith  unto  salvation  ready  to  be  revealed  in  the  last 

-in 


394 

time," — 1  Pet,  I.  5.  These  declarallons  seem  evidently  in- 
tended, and  certainly  are  abundantly  forcible,  to  support  the 
conclusion,  that  those  who  have  once  been  brought  to  sin- 
cere repentance,  and  to  true  obedience,  shall  never  lose  the 
habits  of  grace,  so  as,  in  the  language  of  the  sj stems,  finally 
and  totally  to  fall  away, 

OF  THE  IMPORTANCE  OF  THIS  DOCTRINE. 

If  it  be  demanded,  of  what  utility  can  the  belief  of  this 
doctrine  prove  to  a  sincere  christian  ?  This  is  an  inquiry  to 
be  answered  only  by  the  experience  of  the  saints.  And  ma- 
ny of  the  most  pious  christians  have  given  to  it  their  humble 
and  fervent  testimony,  that  it  has  contributed  to  preserve 
them  continually  mindful  of  their  entire  dependance  on  the 
gracious  aids  of  the  Spirit  of  God,  the  true  source  of  their 
ability  for  every  duty.  And  the  doctrine  may  afford  a  live- 
ly consolation  to  the  believer  in  those  moments  when  his 
faith  is  strong,  and  his  holy  aflfections  are  most  animated,  and 
fervent,  to  be  assured  by  the  promise  of  God,  of  being  at  all 
times  sustained  against  the  weakness  of  human  nature,  and 
rendered  secure  of  the  ultimate  possession  of  eternal  life. 
Yet,  confessed  it  must  be,  that  it  can  afford  small  consolation 
to  the  most  experienced  saint  when  his  graces  are  feeble  and 
languishing,  and  his  mind,  in  consequence,  often  in  a  state  of 
perplexity  and  doubt.  Its  enemies  stigmatize  it  with  being 
an  indolent  docti  ine,  as  if  the  security  of  happiness,  whatever 


a95 

effect  it  might  have  upon  the  hypocrite,  would  ever  dispose 
a  pious  and  generous  mind  to  the  neglect  of  any  duty ;  and 
would  not  rather  stimulate  it  to  augmented  diligence  in  the  di- 
vine life,  by  the  powerful  excitement  of  gratitude.  This  ob- 
jection must  arise  from  inattention  to  the  genuine  principles 
of  human  nature;  and  to  the  scriptural  grounds  on  which  the 
doctrine  rests.  As  to  the  first,  the  assurance  of  possessing 
a  felicity  which  we  greatly  value,  and  have  long  earnestly- 
sought  to  acquire,  often  redoubles  our  exertions,  and  always, 
in  a  generous  mind,  raises  its  powers  to  a  higher  tone  of  ac- 
tion. With  regard  to  the  second,  the  grounds  on  which  this 
doctrine  rests  in  the  holy  scriptures  is,  the  merciful  constitu- 
tion of  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  and  the  promised  influences  of 
the  Holy  Spirit.  These  principles,  as  they  have  been  al- 
ready explained,  far  from  nourishing  an  indolent  temper,  are 
connected  with  the  highest  exertions  of  the  human  faculties 
and  the  most  faithful  use  of  all  the  appointed  means  of  sanc- 
tification.  Upon  the  whole,  however,  this  doctrine,  in  the 
discussions  it  has  undergone,  and  the  manner  in  which  it 
has  often  been  treated,  has  unhappily  been  connected 
more  with  the  truth  of  speculation,  and  contended  for  more 
earnestly  on  that  ground,  than  for  its  influence  on  practical 
holiness.  Speculative  truth,  however,  is  intimately  con- 
joined with  practical  utility.  But  many  of  the  truths  in- 
volved in  the  disquisitions  which  have  taken  place  on  this 
subject,  rest  upon  principles  so  sublime,  or  of  so  refined  a 
aature,  as  hardly  to  be  obvious  to  the  greater  part  of  those 


3pd 

for  whom  the  gospel  was  chiefly  designed,  and  are  found,  in 
experience,  easily  liable,  in  ignorant  minds,  to  mistake  and 
perversion. 

The  Calvinistic  writers  appear  to  me  generally  to  form 
their  conclusions  on  grounds  of  the  soundest  reason,  and  most 
according  to  the  spirit  of  the  sacred  writings.  But,  from  mu- 
tual prejudice,  and  mistake,  the  discussions  on  this,  and  seve- 
ral related  subjects,  have  been  managed,  on  all  sides,  with 
kss  temper  and  forbearance  than  become  the  professors  of  a 
mild  and  humble  religion.  Consequences  have  been  mu- 
tually imputed  which  no  party  would  acknowledge.  Differ- 
ences have  been  studiously  magnified.  And  a  writer  is  lia- 
ble to  incur  the  censure  of  all,  for  presuming  to  judge  can- 
didly between  them.  But  let  me  entreat  you  to  rcmembci> 
that,  into  the  pulpit,  speculations  too  abstruse,  and  passions 
too  warm,  should  never  enter.  All  these  doctrines,  so  ne- 
cessary for  preserving  the  unity  and  harmony  of  the  system 
of  christian  theology,  may,  by  a  meek  and  charitable  mind, 
be  treated  without  acrimony,  and  with  a  calmness  and  benev- 
olence of  discussion  which  (he  humility  of  true  piety  re- 
quires, and  which,  indeed,  is  best  adapted  to  general  edifica- 
tion. 

It  ought  ever  io  be  remembered,  however,  that  the  most 
pious  and  judicious  assertors  of  this  doctrine  do  never  repose 
themselves  in  indolent  security  upon  their  faith  in  the  final 


/ 


39? 

stability,  and  safety  of  their  spiritual  state.  None  are  gen- 
crally  more  assiduous  to  make  their  calling  and  election  sure> 
They  rest  their  hope,  it  is  true,  on  the  faithfulness  of  a  di- 
vine promise,  but,  like  all  the  promises  in  the  word  of  God, 
it  is  intimately  connected  with  the  co-action  of  the  believer's 
mind,  which  is  always  and  equally  embraced  in  the  divine 
purpose.  Their  stedfastness  in  holiness  here,  or  in  happi- 
ness hereafter,  is  not  the  consequence  of  any  physical  neces 
sity  of  nature  imposed  by  the  decrees  of  God  ;  but  is  effect 
ed  entirely  by  practical  motives  adapted  to  the  rational  and 
moral  principles  of  a  holy  and  sanctified  mind.  The  decrees 
of  Heaven  cannot  be  certainly  known,  but,  whatever  they 
are,  they  are  the  concern  only  of  the  Supreme  and  Infinite 
Mind.  They  are  not  designed  to  affect  the  duties  of  human 
J^ature,  which  are  regulated  wholly  by  another  law. 


OP 

JUSTIFICATION 


JrsTiFiCATioN  19  the  immediate  consequence,  on  the 
part  of  God,  of  a  sincere  faith  ;  and  is  defined,  in  the  ortho- 
dox symbols,  to  be  an  act  of  God's  free  grace,  by  which  the 
penitent  and  believing  sinner  is  acquitted  from  the  guilt  and 
condemnation  of  his  sins,  and  accepted,  and  treated  as  right- 
eous, only  for  the  sake  of  the  merits  of  Jesus  Christ ;  receiv- 
ed by  faith,  and  imputed  to  him,  according  to  the  tenor  of  the 
New  Covenant.  Justification  is  a  forensic  term  taken  from 
a  process  in  law,  in  which  the  criminal  is  acquitted  of  the 
charges  exhibited  against  him,  so  as  to  be  absolved  from  the 
penalties  pronounced  by  the  law,  and  he  restored,  and  again 
entitled  to  the  privileges  of  citizenship.  This  is  a  peculiar 
case  in  which  the  criminal,  though  culpable  with  respect  io 
every  charge,  is  absolved  through  the  mediation  of  another, 
who  has  satisfied  the  demands  of  justice  and  the  law  in  his 
room.  The  reasonableness  and  equity  of  vicarious  substitu- 
tion, and  consequently,  of  the  imputation  of  the  merits  of  one 
to  another  in  certain  cases,  has  been  already  considered,  im- 
der  the  Covenant  of  Grace, 


400 

Justiticalion  is  iiot  a  grace  of  the  heart,  but  solely  an  act  oi 
God's  free  mercy,  absolving  the  penitent  sinner  from  the  pen- 
ahy  due  to  his  transgressions,  and  entitling  him,  according  to 
the  promise  of  the  covenant,  to  the  inheritance  of  eternal 
life.  I  need  hardly  appeal  to  particular  passages  in  support 
of  these  ideas,  they  are  so  uniformly  borne  on  the  face  of  the 
'.vhole  scriptures,  and,  especially,  of  the  writings  of  the  great 
apostle  of  the  Gentiles. 

Some  writers  conceive  an  opposition,  amounting  almost  to 
contradiction,  between  the  ideas  of  free  grace,  and  the  impu- 
tation  of  the  perfect  righteousness  of  the  Redeemer.  If  the 
law  is  completely  satisfied,  they  ask,  what  can  be  demanded 
more  of  the  penitent  believer  ?  In  this  objection  they  must 
certainly  forget,  or  their  prejudices  must  be  unwilling  to  ad- 
mit, that  it  is  the  effect  merely  of  divine  mercy,  that  such  a 
satisfaction  has  been  made  for  offending  man ;  and,  when 
made,  it  is  equally  of  free  grace,  in  consequence  of  the  mer- 
ciful constitution  of  the  covenant,  that  it  is  applied  to  the  be- 
liever. "  For  it  is  not  through  works  of  righteousness  which 
we  have  done,  but  by  grace  we  are  saved  through  faith  ;  and 
that,  not  of  ourselves,  it  is  the  gift  of  God."  It  is  the  quali- 
iication  of  faith  alone  which  prepares  and  enables  the  believer 
to  receive  and  enjoy  the  blessings  of  salvation. 


LOi 


THE  DIFFERENCE  BETWEEN    THE  APOSTLES    ST.  PAUL  ANi 
ST.  JAMES  ON  THIS  SUBJECT. 

It  is  frequenllj  objected  to  us,  that  the  apostle  James  as- 
cribes the  justification  of  the  believer,  not  to  his  faith,  but  to 
his  good  works.  To  understand  St.  James,  in  this  place, 
it  is  necessary  carefully  to  attend  to  his  object  in  writing  this 
epistle.  He  wished  to  turn  the  attention  of  the  church  to 
that  criterion  by  which  the  disciples  of  Christ  should  most 
effectually  demonstrate  the  sincerity  of  their  faith,  and  their 
attachment  to  their  Redeemer.  There  were  in  that  age,  as 
there  are  in  every  period,  many  who  presumed  to  recommend 
themselves  to  their  fellow-christians  by  a  boastful  ostentation 
of  religious  zeal,  while  they  were  destitute  of  those  works  of 
piety  and  virtue  which  alone  could  adorn  their  holy  profes- 
sion, in  the  esteem  of  mankind.  Such  false  and  hollow  pre- 
tences occasioned  great  reproach  to  the  nascent  cause  of 
Christianity.  The  apostle,  therefore,  was  solicitous  to  purge 
the  church  of  these  blots  on  the  Christian  name  ;  and  c6  con- 
vince the  world  that  the  faith  of  Christ,  instead  of  being  a 
cover  for  indolence  and  vice,  is  the  most  effectual  principle  of 
good  morals  and  sanctity  of  life.  In  his  epistle,  therefore, 
he  earnestly  teaches  that,  in  the  actual  circumstances  of  the 
church,  it  was  of  primary  importance,  that  the  disciples  of 
Christ  should  exhibit,  in  their  example,  the  virtuous  and  holy 
influence  of  their  doctrine.    And,  as  faith  was  publicly  knowri 


402 
to  be  the  fundamental  principle  of  their  practical  system,  he 
was  anxious  to  redeem  it  from  the  aiisrepresentation  and  re- 
proach of  infidelity,  as  partaking  only  of  the  spirit  of  a  weak 
credulity,  without  any  of  the  useful  energies  of  viitue  and 
charity,  which   would    render  it  a  blessing  to  the  world. 
Hence  he  was  so  much  concerned  that  the  gentiles  should  be 
impressed  with  the  conviction  that  the  disciples  had  not  made 
a  vain  boast  of  the  efficacy  of  the  vital  principle  of  their  re- 
ligion;   but,  that  before  the  world,  they  should  justify  by 
their  good  works,  the  sanctifying  power  of  that  faith  which 
they  had  so  highly  extolled.     This  would  bring  real  glory  to 
the  gospel  of  Christ.     Therefore,  whatever  false  disciples 
may  pretend  about  a  visionary,  unproductive  faith,  to  the  dis- 
credit of  their  Saviour,  a  sincere  believer  will  always  be  stu- 
dious to  demonstrate  his  faith  by  his  works  of  charity  and 
righteousness.     So  that  the  design  of  the  blessed  apostle  ap- 
pears to  be,  not  to  make  the  justification  of  the  sinner  before 
God  to  depend  upon  his  good  works  ;  but  to  make  the  good 
works  of  the  believer  to  be  the  justification  of  the  sincerity 
of  hiaf.!aith  before  the  church,  and  before  the  world.     Thus 
was  Abraham's  fctith J  justified  by  his  works.      For,  as  the 
body  without  the  spirit  is  dead,  so  faith  without  works  is 
dead  also. 

By  some  divines  of  respectable  name,  this  is  called  a  second 
justification  ;  thereby  meaning  a  justification  to  ourselves,  to 
the  church,  and  to  the  world,  of  the  integrity  of  our  profej- 


403 

sion  of  the  name  of  Christ,  and  of  the  purify  of  that  holy 
principle  of  faith  which  governs  in  the  heart  of  a  true 
disciple.  And  this  practical  manifestation  of  a  pure  and  sin- 
cere faith,  is,  indeed,  the  genuine  source  of  the  pious  conso- 
lation of  a  believer,  and  the  only  stable  ground  on  which  he 
can  apply  to  himself  the  gracious  promises  of  the  New  Cov- 
enant. For,  although  the  integrity  of  his  faith  is  known  to 
the  Omniscient  Jehovah,  in  the  first  moments  of  its  existence, 
as  well  as  at  any  future  period  ;  and  his  justification  passes 
immediately  with  God,  before  any  practical  proofs  exhibited 
to  men  of  its  pious  and  charitable  works  ;  yet,  by  its  fruits 
alone  can  we  certainly  demonstrate  our  title  to  rejoice  in  our 
Interest  in  the  redemption  that  is  in  Christ  Jesus  our  Lord. 

THE  BELIEVER,  NOTWITHSTANDING  HIS    JUSTIFICATION, 
STILL  SUBJECT  TO  THE  CALAMITIES  OF  THIS  LIFE. 

The  believer,  notwithstanding  his  deliverance  from  the  do- 
minion of  sin,  and  his  being  made  an  heir  of  eternal  life  by 
the  imputation  of  the  righteousness  of  Christ,  must  continue, 
in  this  world,  subject  to  the  manifold  evils  resulting  from  the 
frailties  of  a  mortal  body,  and  frequently  from  a  disordered 
mind.  By  the  introduction  of  the  New  Covenant,  establish- 
ed in  the  power  and  grace  of  the  Mediator,  provision  is  made 
for  his  ultimate  redemption  from  eternal  death,  when  he  shall 
have  laid  in  the  grave  the  corruptions  of  the  flesh.  In  the 
mean  time,  the  moral  depravation  of  the  soul  is  gradually  de^ 


404 

iU'oyed  by  the  spirit  of  sanctification,  and  all  his  temporal 
evil  Ihoiigh  not  removed,  while  the  body  remains,  are, 
throiigh  the  covenant,  converted  into  blessings,  and  become 
a  salutary  discipline,  under  the  direction  of  the  Holy  Spirit, 
to  cultirate  the  heart  for  heaven.  And  highly  useful  they 
are  to  elevate  the  soul  above  all  undue  attachments  to  the 
present  world,  and  to  break  vrithin  it  the  strength  and  power 
of  sin.  It  is  among  the  laws  of  our  nature  that,  in  our  edu- 
cation for  eternity,  no  less  than  in  our  education  for  dis- 
charging usefully  and  honourably  the  offices  of  this  life,  we 
ahould  grow  wise  by  our  errors,  and  that  correction  should 
often  be  necessary  to  preserve  the  mind  attentive  io  its  duties. 

The  Romish  cliurcb  taught  the  extraordinary  and  unscrip- 
iural  doctrine,  that  the  sufferings  of  our  blessed  Saviour  did 
aot  accomplish  a  complete  atonement  for  the  sins  of  man- 
kind  ;  but  that  the  afflictions  imposed  on  believers  in  the  ar- 
rangements of  providence,  arc  to  be  regarded  as  part  of  the 
Tienalty  of  the  divine  law ;  and  if  the  destined  measure  of 
their  pains  should  not  be  entirely  inflicted  in  the  present  life, 
they  are  to  be  fulfilled  in  a  future  and  purgatorial  state.  On 
the  sauic  ground  they  have  built  the  still  more  absurd  doc- 
trine, of  the  efficacy  of  voluntary  mortifications  to  complete 
the  requisite  proportion  of  the  sufferings  of  Christ  in  them, 
and  to  deliver  them  from  a  correspondent  part  of  the  pains  of 
purgatory.  But  the  doctrine  most  obnoxious  to  common 
sense,  and  fartliest  removed  from  the  humble  spirit  of  the 


405 

gospel,  is,  that  eminent  saints,  for  whom  the  demands  of  the 
law  have  been  aheady  satisfied  by  the  sufferings  of  Christ, 
together  with  their  own,  may,  by  voluntary  and  extraordinary 
duties,  inflictions,  and  sacrifices,  lay  up  a  store  of  merit,  to 
be  imputed,  along  with  that  of  the  Saviour,  to  believers  less 
advanced  in  (he  road  of  perfection.  On  this  wretched  foun- 
dation was  built  that  shameful  trafic  of  indulgences,  and 
purgatorial  exemptions,  which  grew  to  such  enormity,  as  to 
become,  at  length,  one  of  the  principal  causes  of  the  reforma- 
tion in  the  sixteenth  century.  A  single  passage  in  the  epistle 
to  the  Collossians,  and  that  grossly  misinterpreted,  by  the 
knavery  of  the  Popes,  and  the  ignorance  of  the  jVIonks,  was 
the  sole  support  of  this  monstrous  fabric.  It  is  contained  in  * 
the  following  words : — Who  now  rejoice  in  my  sufferings  for 
yoUy  and  Jill  up  that  which  is  behind  of  the  afflictions  of 
Christ,  in  my  flesh,  for  his  body^s  sake,  which  is  the  churchy 
— ch.  i.  ver.  24.  The  expression  my  sufferings  for  you 
evidently  refers  to  the  pains  which  he  endured  in  their  ser- 
vice ;  and  that  which  follows,  on  which  the  principal  stress 
is  laid,  the  afflictions  of  Christ  6xi^m  ^e^m,  is  a  Grecism 
which  signifies  the  afflictions  borne  by  him  for  the  sake  of 
Christ ;  and  is  similar,  in  the  structure  of  the  phrase,  to  other 
expressions,  TrccOfii^xIcc  m  Xptin — vc^cp&crtT  Kvpia  iijc-s — ovu^to-fMi 
ra  Xfi^a,  the  import  of  which  has  never  created  any  diflScul- 
ty,  because  there  is  no  sinister  purpose  to  be  answered  by 
a  false  interpretation.  The  full  force  of  these  phrases  may 
be  given  in  the  following  words :    Who  now  rejoice  in  the 


406 

mjferings  that  I  hear  for  youy  7vhich  are  necessary  to  fill  up 
that  measure  of  afflictions  in  the  service  of  Christ  which  pro- 
vidence has  still  destined  for  me  in  my  assiduous  endeavours 
to  promote  the  interest  of  his  church. 

Before  dismissing  these  brief  remarks  on  the  justification 
of  the  sinner,  through  faith  in  the  righteousness  of  the  ever 
blessed  Redeemer,  it  deserves  our  particular  notice  that  this 
doctrine,  contrary  to  the  misrepresentations  of  its  enemies, 
far  from  being  unfriendly  to  morals,  is  peculiarly  favourable 
to  the  interests  of  practical  virtue  and  piety.  And  as  far  as 
human  observation  extends,  it  has  ever  been  found  that  the 
•friends  of  this  system  of  truth  have  been  distinguished  as  the 
warmest  advocates,  and  the  most  eminent  examples  of  sanc- 
tity of  life.  It  is  particularly  worthy  the  attention  of  the  de- 
vout and  rational  christian,  that,  not  only  is  this  true  as  an 
historical  fact,  but  it  is  the  natural  result  of  the  principle. 
Resting,  as  it  does,  on  the  full  and  perfect  atonement  accom- 
plished by  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  instead  of  affording  any 
indulgence  or  protection  in  sin,  it  is  the  most  eflfectual  mean 
of  destroying  its  power  in  the  life,  and  utterly  exterminating 
its  root  from  (he  heart.  To  establish  this  truth  on  the  sur- 
est foundations,  let  us  consider  the  whole  structure  of  the 
gospel  of  our  salvation,  whence  the  consequence  will  arise 
with  conspicuous  evidence  to  our  view.  Its  foundation  it 
deeply  lays  in  the  humiliating  doctrine  of  the  entire  depravi- 
ty of  human  nature,  and  our  consequent  subjection  to  the 


40  r 

righteous  condemnation  of  eternal  death.  From  this  fearful 
sentence  the  humbled  soul  finds  no  relief,  but  in  the  rich  re- 
demption that  is  In  Jesus  Christ,  by  faith  in  his  name.  A 
profound  persuasion  of  these  interesting  facts,  attested 
equally  by  the  gospel  and  his  own  aj91)|||ip|  experience,  ren- 
ders the  salvation  of  the  cross  so  indispensably  necessary  to 
the  peace,  and  so  infinitely  precious  to  the  hopes  of 
the  guilty  offender.  But,  in  the  astonishing  humiliation 
of  the  Son  of  God,  on  which  this  system  ^f  divine  grace  is  built, 
and  his  sufferings,  under  the  imputed  guilt  of  human  nature, 
the  believing  penitent  is  led  to  discern,  and  strongly  to  feel 
how  obnoxious  he  is  to  the  righteous  displeasure  of  Almighty 
God.  Hence  naturally  arises  in  his  heart  an  overwhelming 
sentiment  of  the  evil  of  his  sins,  and  a  profound  and  fixed  ab- 
horrence of  their  defilement  and  their  power.  These  princi- 
ples are  intimately  involved  in  one  another,  and  almost  ne  • 
eessarily  spring  from  the  united  view  of  himself  as  a  sinner, 
and  of  Christ  as  his  Redeemer. 

With  them  are  essentially  conjoined  an  ulterior  discovery 
and  most  intimate  persuasion  of  the  impossibility  of  the  for- 
giveness  of  sin,  without  a  complete  atonement  for  the  viola- 
tion of  the  divine  law,  the  grandeur  of  which,  while  it  dis- 
plays the  malignity  of  our  offences,  exhibits,  at  the  same 
time,  and  in  the  same  hi£;h  colours,  the  inBnite  compassions 
and  love  of  the  Redeemer  to  the  human  sinner ;  a  sublime 


403 

idea,  which  recipiocaiiy  tends  to  exalt  the  love  of  the  belier 
er  to  him  who  is  the  glorious  author  of  all  mercy  and  grace. 

When  all  these  views  are  taken  in  at  once,  as  they  must 
be  by  those  who^«j*erely  receive  this  self-abasing  but  con- 
solatory doctrine,  what  a  profound  and  sanctifying  effect  is  it 
fiited  to  produce  on  the  heart !  What  an  efficient  principle 
does  it  become  of  the  purest  morals  and  virtue  in  the  life !  I 
do  not  say,  indeed,  tjiat  these  happy  consequences  will  arise 
from  any  speculative  conviction  of  these  principles,  however 
clearly  they  may  be  conceived  by  the  understanding  ;  but  to 
the  warm  and  affectionate  believer,  they  spring  almost  neces- 
sarily out  of  the  united  views  of  the  justice  and  the  mercy 
of  Jehovah  our  Saviour. 

This  doctrine  of  justification  by  grace  through  the  atone- 
ment of  a  divine  Redeemer,  by  presenting  to  the  mind  the 
most  sublime  discoveries  of  the  holiness  of  the  divine  naturCj 
suggests  by  a  reflex  act,  the  perfect  purity  of  soul  which 
should  reign  in  all  our  approaches  to  the  Deity,  in  his  holy 
ordinances,  in  his  church  on  earth,  and  should  pervade  the 
entire  intercourse  of  mankind  with  one  another.  That  is,  in 
one  word,  which  should  regulate  the  whole  system  of  their 
moral  conduct,  both  with  regard  to  Almighty  God  their  Cre- 
ator, and  to  the  great  fraternity  of  their  brethren ; — Their 
piety,  their  justice,  their  truth,  their  amiable  charity,  and  UDi- 
Tersal  beneroleHce. 


409 

I  add;  that  it  contributes,  in  no  inferior  degree,  to  promote 
the  practical  holiness  of  the  believer,  by  the  powerful  motive 
of  gratitude  for  the  redeeming  mercy  of  Heaven.     For,  no 
where  else   can  the  condescension  of  Almighty  God  to  the 
imperfection  of  the  creature,  and  his  grace  to  the  un worthi- 
ness of  the  sinner,  be  discerned  in  so  resplendent  and  im- 
pressive a  light ;  no  where  else,  do  the  perfections,  and  love 
of  the  Creator,  and  Redeemer  of  mankind,  shine  with  such 
conspicuous  evidence,  and  calculated  to  raise  the  devout  af- 
fections of  Qie  soul  to  so  transcendent  an  elevation.     Here  in- 
finite justice  is  contemplated  as  combined  with  infinite  mercy? 
and  mercy  appears  more  glorious,  when  it  is  seen  emerging, 
for  the  salvation  of  the  sinner,  from  beneath  the  heavy  clouds 
of  a  consuming  justice.     No  view  of  the  mercy  of  God  most 
holy,  and  of  the  infinite  love  of  the  Redeemer  is  fitted  so 
completely  to  absorb  all  the  powers  of  the  soul.     We  love 
him  tecause  he  first  loved  its. 

Let  us  now  consider  the  aspect  which  the  love  of  God,  so 

powerfully  promoted  by  this  doctrine  bears  on  the  general 

morals  of  Christianity,     It  is  the  supreme  principle  of  all 

genuine  religion,   whether  it  be  the  religion  of  nature,  or  of 

revelation.     Wherein,  then,  does  it  consist?  Not,  surely,  in 

the   love,    or  even  the  conception  of  his  essential  nature. 

For  of  that  no  idea  can  be  framed  by  the  human  intellect. 

It  is  the  love  only  of  his  perfections,  by  which  alone  he  can 

be   conceived  of  by  ns;  and  espcci^Uy  of  his  moral  :iff:'' 

52 


410 

bules,  his  holiness,  his  justice,  his  boundless  goodness,  his 
universal  love,  so  illustriously  displayed  in  the  salvation  of 
the  sinner  through  the  cross  of  Christ. 

*  Here,  then,  O  Christian !  we  discern  the  genuine  root  of 
a  holy  life,  in  the  supreme  love  of  perfections  which  form 
the  most  efficient  principles  of  christian  morals  ;  and  which, 
operating  on  all  the  springs  of  action  in  the  soul,  create  the 
nearest  resemblance  on  earth,  to  the  image  of  God,  which  is 
the  perfection  of  holiness  and  virtue. 

OF  ADOPTION. 

In  the  order  of  systematic  arrangement.  Adoption  is  usu- 
ally considered  as  immediately  following,  and  intimately  con- 
nected with  the  doctrine  of  justification.  Few  words  are 
necessary  for  stating  or  explaining  this  subject,  it  being  ra' 
Iher  expressive  of  that  external  relation,  in  which  it  pleases 
God  to  place  the  believer  to  himself,  than  descriptive  of  the 
moral  state  of  the  mind.  The  spirit  of  adoptioUy  indeed, 
spoken  of  by  the  apostle,  embraces  all  those  dutiful  senti- 
ments, and  pious  dispositions,  which  become  so  great  a  mer- 
cy and  so  intimate  a  relation :  b^it  adoption  simply  is  expres- 
sive of  the  relation  itself  which  the  justified  believer  holds  to 
his  Heavenly  Father.  It  is  a  forensic  term  taken  from  the 
modes  prescribed  in  the  laws  of  most  nations,  by  which  a 
child,  not  born  in  a  certain  family,  is  legally  received  into  >t^ 


411 

and  becomes  entitled  to  its  privileges,  honours,  and  inheritan- 
ces. As  applied  to  believers  it  is  a  figure  which  designates, 
with  no  small  propriety  and  force,  the  blessings  to  which 
Ihey  are  advanced  in  consequence  of  their  justification. 
They  are  assimilated  to  the  image  of  their  heavenly  Father 
« — they  partake  of  ]iis  paternal  protection  and  care — and, 
according  to  his  gracious  promise,  and  the  constitution  of 
the  New  Testament  confirmed  in  the  blood  of  Christ,  they 
are  made  heirs  of  an  eternal  inheritance.  Taken  from 
a  state  of  hostile  estrangement,  they  are  introduced  into  his 
family- 

This  figure  was  peculiarly  expressive  and  obvious,  at  the 
time  when  the  evangelists  and  apostles  wrote,  and  within  the 
limits  of  the  Roman  empire ;  because  the  necessity  and  the 
practice  of  adoption,  was  in  that  nation,  and  in  that  age, 
more  prevalent  than  at  any  other  period  of  history,  or  in 
any  other  portion  of  the  globe.  There  are  many  passages  in 
the  sacred  writings  which  justify  the  introduction  of  this 
term  into  our  systems  to  express  this  relation  of  the  believ- 
er to  God  under  the  Covenant  of  Grace.  "  As  many  as  re- 
ceived him,"  saith  the  evangelist  John,  "to  them  gave  he 
power  to  become  the  sons  of  God,  even  to  them  that  believe 
sn  his  name."  And  the  apostle  Paul;  "As  many  as  are 
led  by  the  Spirit  of  God,  they  are  the  sons  of  God,  for  ye 
liave  not  received  the  spirit  of  bondage  again  to  fear ;  but  ye 
Jliave  received  the  spirit  of  adoption,  by  which  we  cry  Ab- 


4lii 

ba !  Father !  The  Spirit  itself  testifieth  with  our  spirit  that 
we  ?re  the  sons  of  God  ;  and,  if  sons,  then  heirs— heirs  of 
God,  and  joint  heirs  with  Christ," — Rom.  viii.  14... .17. 
To  the  Ephesians  he  writes  ;  "  Having  foreordained  us  unto 
adoption  through  Jesus  Christ,  unto  himself,  according  io 
the  good  pleasure  of  his  will,  to  the  praise  of  the  glory  of  his 
grace," — Eph.  i.  5,  6. 

Adoption  is  an  act  of  the  free  grace  of  God  towards  the 
onworlhy,  and  the  guilty  ;  and,  along  with  justification  is  the 
immediate  effect  of  faith,  and  one  of  the  promised  blessings 
of  the  covenant  of  grace. 

Before  concluding  this  article,  I  will  briefly,  and  in  a  single 
word,  state  the  happy  consequences  of  this  blessed  relation 
to  his  Creator  and  Redeemer  into  which  the  believer  is  tak- 
en. In  the  first  place,  peace  with  God,  through  our  Lord 
Jesus  Christ,  the  cause  of  his  displeasure  being  removed, 
and  there  being  no  longer  any  obstruction  to  that  intimacy  of 
union  which  should  connect  the  soul  with  God,  and  that  full- 
ness and  freedom  of  affection  which  should  fill  the  heart  of  a 
dutiful  son  towards  his  Heavenly  Father. — In  the  next  place, 
peace  of  conscience,  which  is  asiongst  the  sweetest  enjoy- 
ments of  which  the  renewed  soul,  formed  after  the  image  of 
God,  is  capable. — Thirdly,  the  profound  and  delightfnl  sen- 
timent of  the  Love  of  God  for  his  unspeakable  mercy,  in^ 
spiring  the  continual  desire  of  acting  worthy  of  that  high  re- 


413 

lation  into  wkich  the  believer  is  received  by  the  spirit  of 
Adoption. — And,  finally,  habitual  and  increasing  sanctifica- 
tion  of  heart  and  life,  and  growing  preparation  for  that  "  in- 
heritance uncornipted,  undefiled,  and  that  fadeth  not  away, 
reserved  in  heaven  for  those, who"^ are  kept  by  the  power  of 
God,  through  faith,  unto  salvation,  ready  to  be  revealed  in 
the  last  lime,"  I  Pet.  I  4,5, 


OF  THE 

JVATURE  OF  FAITH ; 

ITS  EFFICACr  AJTD    EXCELLENCE  A3  A    PRACTICAL     PRINCI. 
PLE  OF  HOLINESS,  AND  CONSEQ.UENTLY  THE  REASON- 
ABLENESS OF  ITS  POSSESSING  SUCH  A  DISTIN- 
GUISHED PLACE  IN  THE  CHRIS/- 
T5AN    SYSTEM* 


Having  already  pronounced  faith  to  be  the  condition  of 
the  Covenant  of  Grace,  and  briefly  spoken  of  the  justifica- 
tion, adoption,  and  sanctification  of  the  believer,  as  among  the 
precious  fruits  of  this  covenant,  I  have,  however,  thought  it 
necessary,  on  account  of  the  high  importance  of  the  doctrines 
of  faith  in  the  christian  system,  to  treat  of  it  with  somewhat 
greater  extent  and  precision.  As  it  is  the  fundamental  arti- 
cle of  the  gospel,  it  has  accordingly  been  attacked  by  the  ene- 
mies of  Christianity  with  peculiar  virulence,  and  with  the 
most  disingenuous  sarcasm ;  insultingly  presuming  that 
the  gospel  needs  the  support  of  faith,  only  in  proportion 
as  it  is  destitute  of  reason.  The  evidences  on  which 
our  faith  is  sustained  have  been  already  discussed,  as  far  as 
this  compendious  system  would  admit.  And,  on  the  most 
rigouroua  investigation,  it  will  be  found  to.  rest  on  secure 


416 

and  solid  foundations.  Its  enemies,  taking  advantage  of  as 
obvious  prejudice  against  the  name  of  faith,  find  an  occasion, 
either  through  ignorance  or  enmity,  to  impeach  the  whole 
system  as  an  appeal  to  the  credulity  of  mankind.  On  the 
contrary,  this  doctrine,  when  calmly  and  dispassionately  con- 
sidered, will  be  found,  notwithstanding  the  objecfions  of  its 
enemies,  not  less  conformable  to  the  principles  of  reason,  than 
it  isto  the  prescriptions  of  Christ.  For  it  is  equally  true  of 
every  moral  institution,  as  of  the  gospel,  that  its  doctrines^ 
its  laws,  its  sanctions,  and  the  authority  on  which  the  whole 
depends,  must*  be  clearly  comprehended,  and  heartily  be- 
lieved, before  they  can  acquire  an  influence  on  manners  and 
conduct.  Had  Christianity  been  simply  a  philosophic  insti- 
tute, intended  to  regulate  morals,  and  to  persuade  mankind  to 
a  virtuous  life,  yet  must  its  doctrines  have  been  received  as 
truth,  with  a  proper  understanding  of  their  nature,  worth,  and 
importance,  (and  what  else  is  faith?)  before  they  could  have 
exerted  any  practical  effect  on  the  heart  and  affections. — - 
Thus  does  the  principle  of  faith  become,  not  only  a  neces- 
sary, but  a  most  rational  basisof  the  gospel,  whether  we  con- 
slder  it  as  a  code  of  doctrine  addressed  to  the  intellect,  or  a 
system  of  precepts  regulating  the  practice.  And,  inasmuch 
as  the  mass  of  mankind  are  incapable  of  deducing  the  system 
cf  their  duties  from  the  fountains  of  reason  alone ;  still  less 
are  the  wisest  of  their  sages  capable  of  entering  into  (he  un- 
searchable counsels  of  God,  so  as  explain  to  us  en.  what 
terms  the  repentance  of  a  sinner  may  be  acoepted  of  him,  in 


41? 

order  to  bis  reconciliation  ;  or  of  penetrating  the  darkness 
which  hangs  over  the  everlasting  destinies  of  mankind  ;  and 
since  truth,  and  comfortable  hope,  on  these  subjects,  must  be 
purely  the  effect  of  revelation,  faith  is,  with  still  more  pro- 
priety, made  the  fundamental  principle  of  the  christian  sys- 
tem.    It  is  confessed  that  the  peculiar  and  discriminating 
doctrines  of  Christianity  cannot  rest  on  the  discoveries  of  hu- 
man reason.     They  must  be  received,  if  they  are  rationally 
received  at  all,  upon  the  evidence  of  those  omnipotent  works 
performed  by  Jesus  Christ,  which  identify  him  with  the  Au- 
thor of  all  truth.     We  believe,  not  because  he  hath  taught 
like  the  leader  of  a  philosophic  sect,  in  a  chain  of  the  most 
accurate  and    conclusive   reasoning;  but  because  he   halh 
made  it  evident,  that,  in  hh  words,  God  himseir,  the  Authoi: 
of  all  truth,  hath  spoken.     For,  we  can  have  no  doubt  of  the 
presence  of  God  in  the  midst  of  those  astonishing  displays  of 
divine  power,  with  wlilch  the  Saviour  hath  invited  the  atten- 
tion of  the  world  ;  nor  of  the  veracity  of  that  testimony,  the 
truth  of  which  the  Almighty  has  deigned  to  confirm  with  his 
own  seal.     As  it  is  the  privilege  of  children  to  receive  the 
lessons  of  duty  and  wisdom  from  the  mouth  of  a  wise  parent, 
which  they  ought  to  admit  with  implicit  reverence,  before 
their  minds  are  sufficiently  mature  to  discern  their  founda- 
tions in  the  eternal  principles  of  reason,   so  the  disciple  of 
Christ  humbly  learns,  by  faith,  at  the  feet  of  his  Redeemer, 
those  truths  which  he  could  not  otherwise  receive,  till  the 

soul,  ripened  by  the  instructions  of  his  grace  and  Spirit,  shall 

63 


4ia 

be  enabled  to  contemplate  them,  in  Ibe  light  of  heaven  with 
an  angel's  reason. — I  proceed,  therefore,  to  exhibit  the  na- 
ture of  Faith,  which  is  our  best  reason,  till  the  period  arrive 
of  immediate  vision. 

DEFINITION  OF  EVANGELIC  FAITH. 

Evangelic  Faith,  in  its  most  general  import,  consists  in  re- 
ceiving the  holy  scriptures,  with  clear  understanding,  and 
with  inward  and  profound  conviction  of  their  truth,  as  con- 
taining the  infallible  word  of  God  ;  and  in  embracing  Jesus 
Christ,  who  is  the  principal  subject  of  them,  as  the  Son  of 
God,  and  the  Saviour  of  the  world.  Apostles,  and  prophets, 
and  inspired  men  are  his  organs  to  declare  his  will  to  man- 
kind ;  but,  to  the  believer,  it  is  God  himself  who  speaks  in 
them. 

On  this  definition  several  guards  and  explanations  are  to 
be  made,  in  order  to  the  more  distinct  understanding  of  the 
subject.  The  holy  scriptures,  besides  the  revelation  of  Je- 
sus Christ,  and  of  eternal  life  through  him,  contain  a  wide 
compass  of  miscellaneous  information,  more  or  less  directly 
connected  with  their  principal  end,  the  publication  of  the 
glad  tidings  of  peace,  to  a  guilty  world.  Faith,  therefore, 
besides- receiving  these  miscellanies  as  truths  which  highly 
concern  the  church,  respects  the  holy  sciptures  chiefly  as 
revealing  a  system  of  mercy  to  fallen  man.     And,  amidst 


419 

their  various  contents,  those  subjects  are  more  peculiarly  in- 
corporated in  the  object  of  faith,  which  are  most  essentially 
conjoined  with  this  idea  of  divine  mercy:  For  example; 
the  fallen  and  guiUy  state  of  human  nature ;  the  perfect 
atonement  for  sin  made  by  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ  ;  the  infi- 
nite greatness,  holiness,  justice,  goodness,  sovereignty,  and 
truth  of  God;  the  beauty  and  excellence  of  the  law  of  ho- 
liness ;  and  the  promise  of  eternal  life  to  the  penitent.  On 
other  subjects  opinions  may  be  more  various,  ideas  may  be 
more  indefinite  and  obscure  :  but  on  these,  belief  ought  to 
be  precise,  clear,  strong. 

In  stating  the  nature  of  faith,  however,  a  distinction  is  to 
be  made  between  that  belief  which  has  a  reference  merely  to 
the  integrity  and  veracity  of  the  prophet,  the  apostle,  or  (he 
messenger  of  Heaven,  and  that  which  respects  also  the  na- 
ture, importance,  and  excellence  of  the  doctrines  which 
these  divine  instructors  communicate.  Let  me  illustrate  my 
meaning  by  a  familiar  example.  We  may  possess  perfect 
confidence  in  the  wisdom  of  an  eminent  moralist,  or  admire 
the  talents  of  a  fine  writer,  who  points  out,  with  all  the  truth 
of  criticism,  the  beauties  of  any  classic  work ;  but  for  want 
of  having  the  reason  properly  cultivated  by  education,  we 
may  not  perceive  the  soundness  of  his  remarks,  or  the  accu- 
racy of  his  reflections  ;  or,  through  deficiency  of  taste,  may 
not  be  able  to  discern  the  beauty  of  his  examples,  nor  the 
delicacy  of  his  illustrations.     The  principles  and  doctrines 


420 

of  the  one,  or  Ihe  delicate  beauties  of  the  other,  cannot  be 
strict  y  said  to  be  objects  of  our  belief;    because  the  former 
are  not  justly  apprehended,  nor  are  the  latter  truly  discern- 
ed, requiring  for  this  purpose,  the  delicacy  of  a  refined 
taste,  and  cultivated   understanding.      To  apply  these   re- 
marks.    A  genuine,  practical,  and  operative  faith  in  the  gos- 
pel, which  is  that  alone  after  which  we  seek,  consists,  not 
merely,  in  acknowledging  the  scriptures  to  be  the  word  of 
God,   or  in  confessing  the  divine  authority,   and  heavenly 
mission  of  the  apostles,  the  prophets,  or  of  Christ  himself, 
all  which  may  be  nothing  more  than  an  hereditary  opinion, 
or  pious  prejudice  derived  from  education  :  but  it  implies,  as 
still  more  essential  to  it,  a  clear  perception  of  the  spiritual 
nature  and  discernment  of  the  divine  excellence  and  beau- 
ty of  the  doctrines  which  they  teach,  especially  as  they  re- 
gard the  glory  of  God,  the  system  of  our  redemption,  and 
the  duties  and  immortal  hopes  of  man ;    and  I  must  add,  still 
further,  a  profound  persuasion,  which  is  a  necessary  conse- 
quence of  the  former,  not  only  of  their  truth,  but  of  their 
infinite  importance  to  our  everlasting  peace  and  happiness. 
These  doctrines,  therefore,  are  not  received  with  genuine 
faith,  but  in  proportion  as  their  true  nature,  as  far  as  they 
are  within  the  comprehension  of  the  human  mind,  is  clearly 
understood  ;    and  clearly  understood  they  cannot  be  but  in 
proportion  as  the   heart  discerns  their  spiritual  excellence, 
and,  with  a  holy  and  divine  taste,  relishes  their  spiritual 
lieau'y ;    fo?  the  excellence  of  virtue,  the  beauty  of  holi- 


421 

ness,  IB  part  of  its  idea.  Here  then  we  begin  to  perceive 
the  moral  and  sanctifying  influence  of  a  sincere  faith ;  for 
what  the  heart  thus  understands  and  loves,  discerning  its  su- 
preme excellence,  must  govern  the  practice.  The  believer 
perceiving,  by  this  gracious  principle,  the  'perfection  of  these 
doctrines,  or,  in  the  language  of  the  scriptures,  the  becmly 
of  holiness,  is  led,  by  the  sweet  attraction  of  a  renewed 
taste,  to  delight  in  the  law  of  God  after  the  inward  man, 

THE  DEPENDENCE  OF  SAVING  FAITH  ON  THE  GOOD 
DISPOSITIONS  OF  THE  HEART. 

Here  also  we  discern,  which  is  my  next  observation,  the 
dependence  of  faith  upon,  or  its  necessary  connexion  with 
the  good  dispositions  of  the  heart. — By  the  understanding  we 
judge  of  speculative  truth.  And  many  writers  have  main- 
tained that  this  power  of  the  mind  alone  is  employed  in  a  ra- 
tional and  consistent  faith.  But  it  ought  always  to  be  re- 
membered that  the  convictions  of  the  understanding  are 
greatly  influenced,  on  all  moral  subjects,  by  the  state  of  the 
aflfections.  It  is  the  heart  alone,  profoundly  touched  by  the 
Spirit  of  grace,  which  creates  those  lively  and  affecting  con- 
ceptions of  the  beauty  and  excellence  of  divine  things, 
which  together  with  the  conclusions  of  reason,  form  the  es- 
sence of  a  practical  faith  the  active  and  operative  principle 
of  a  holy  life.  Hence  the  apostle  hath  said  ;  "  with  the 
heart  man  believeth  unto  righteousness."     And  Philip  repli- 


422 

ed  to  one  asking  the  condition  of  baptism. — If  thou  believest 
with  all  thy  heart,  thou  mayest. 

Will  it  be  asked  if  we  do  not,  by  this  representation,  re- 
quire the  regeneration  of  the  heart,  or  the  formation  m  the 
soul  of  a  divine  and  holy  taste  of  truth,  as  a  prerequisite  to 
faith,  of  which,  change,  however,  faith  is  acknowledged  to  be 
the  only  genuine  principle  ?  By  no  means.  Degenerate  as 
human  nature  is,  it  so  far  possesses  ideas  of  moral  excellence, 
and  consents  to  the  taw  of  God  that  it  is  good,  as  under  the 
gracious  influences  of  the  Divine  Spirit,  co-operating  with 
Lis  holy  word,  to  present  to  that  heavenly  Teacher  a  suffi- 
cient foundation  for  an  understanding  faith  in  its  incipient 
state.  And  when  once  this  holy  illumination,  this  divine 
taste  exists  in  the  weakest  degree,  it  prepares  the  soul,  un- 
der the  culture  of  the  same  word,  and  the  continued  influ- 
ence of  the  same  Spirit,  to  receive  every  doctrine  of  the 
gospel  with  a  fuller  conviction,  to  perceive  increasing  beau- 
ties in  the  isystem  of  grace,  and  to  feel,  with  augmented 
force  the  obligation  of  the  whole  law  of  holiness.  There 
exists  a  strong  analogy  between  the  progress,  and  effects  of 
education  whether  moral  or  scientific,  and  the  influence  of 
this  divine  culture  on  the  mind,  under  the  teachings  of  the 
Holy  Spirit.  The  mind  begins  her  course  blind  to  the  beau- 
ties of  truth,  and  averse  to  the  constraints  of  a  necessary 
discipline ;  but  the  light  which  is  gradually  shed  into  the 
mtnd  improves,  both  the  judgment,  and  the  taste,  and  con- 


42;^ 

tributes,  by  a  fine  and  almost  impercepllble  influence,  to 
ameiioi-afe  the  heart.  We  cannot  pronounce  that  a  happy 
and  formed  taste  must  precede  the  power  of  perceiving  the 
beauty  or  the  light  of  virtue,  or  of  science  in  their  incipient 
state  :  nor  can  we  say,  on  the  other  hand,  that  the  percep- 
tion of  the  beauty  of  virtue  must  precede  the  formation  of  a 
virtuous  taste.  They  are  simultaneously  cultivated,  and,  by 
a  mutual  Influence,  produce  their  effects  on  each  other  by 
an  insensible  reciprocation  of  ideas  and  feelings,  which  is  too 
fine  to  be  marked  in  language  ;  but  does  not  fail  to  be  per- 
ceived by  all  who  are  accustomed  to  attend  with  precision 
to  the  operations  of  their  own  minds. 

THE  RETRIBUTIONS  OF    ETERNITY  INCLUDED  IN  THE  IDEA 
OF  AN  OPERATIVE  AND  EFt  IflENT  FAITH. 

In  speaking  of  faith  as  an  efficient  principle  of  sanctifies- 
tion,  it  is  requisite,  besides  the  spiritual  understanding  of 
the  doctrines  of  the  gospel,  and  the  divine  taste  of  their  ex- 
cellence and  beauty  which  it  implies,  to  include  also  in  its 
idea,  those  powerful  motives  of  holiness  and  obedience 
which  it  derives  from  celestial  and  eternal  things.  In  the 
language  of  the  apostle,  "  it  is  the  substance  of  things  hop- 
ed for,  and  the  evidence  of  things  not  seen."  It  penetrates 
the  veil  which  conceals  them  from  mortal  eyes,  and  presents 
them  to  the  devout  mind,  as  far  as  the  human  faculties  are 
sasceptible  of  these  sublime  ideas,  with  a  transcendent,  and 


424 

ineffable  seusallon.  Among  these  heavenly  objects  we  dis- 
cern especially  the  glory  of  God,  the  infinite  love  of  the  Re- 
deemer, the  final  judgment  of  the^universe,  and  the  ever- 
lasting retributions  of  the  righteous,  and  the  wicked  ; — con- 
siderations which  add  a  mighty  and  practical  force  to  the 
delightful  attractions  of  redeeming  love. 

ASSEMBLAGE  OF  THE  PRECEEDING  PRINCIPLES. 

Let  US  review  the  principles  which  I  have  hitherto  laid 
down  upon  this  subject.  Faith  consists  in  the  first  place, 
and  in  its  most  general  idea,  in  receiving  the  sacred  scrip- 
tures as  containing  the  gracious  revelation  of  the  will  of  God 
for  our  instruction  in  righteousness,  and  our  eternal  salvation. 
' — It  consists  in  the  next  place,  not  only  in  the  belief  of  the 
divine  authority  and  direction  under  which  the  scriptures 
have  been  communicated  to  the  world,  but  in  a  clear  and 
spiritual  understanding  of  the  nature,  and  a  divine  percep- 
tion of  the  excellence  and  perfection  of  their  holy  doctrines, 
— Thirdly,  in  a  strong  impression  on  the  heart  of  those  high 
motives  to  practical  piety  and  virtue,  which  religion  has 
drawn  from  the  glory  of  God,  from  the  redemption  of  the 
cross,  and  the  retributions  of  eternity.  And,  finally,  in  a 
profound  persuasion  of  the  personal,  and  everlasting  concern 
which  we  have  in  those  precious,  those  glorious,  and  those 
awful  truths. 


425 


THE  EFFICACr  OF  FAITH. 


We  conclude,  therefore,  with  the  justest  reason,  that  no 
moral  system,  or  institute  of  religion,  has  ever  laid  such  a 
foundation  for  purity  of  heart,  and  sanctity  of  life,  as  the 
christian  economy,  resting,  as  it  does,  on  the  doctrine  of  a 
sincere  faith  in  the  Redeemer  of  the  world.  If  we  assemble 
all  the  objects  of  faith  in  one  view,  and  receive  them  as  the 
infallible  truths  of  God,  not  with  a  vague,  unmeaning  assent, 
the  fruit  merely  of  custom  and  example,  but  with  a  profound 
conviction,  ai'ising  from  reflection,  from  examination,  from 
the  holy  influence  of  prayer,  aided  by  the  concurrent  illu- 
mination of  the  Eternal  Spirit,  I  may  ask,  with  confidence, 
what  motives  drawn  from  any  other  source,  can  be  compared 
with  those  derived  from  the  gospel,  for  the  purity  of  their 
influence,  and  their  persuasive  power  on  the  heart  ? 

THE  EXCELLENCE  OF  THIS  PRINCIPLE  AB  A  PRACTICAI. 
BASIS  OF  RELIGION. 

The  enemies  of  the  gospel  profess  to  be  offended  at  its 
resting  so  much  on  the  doctrine  of  faith  ;  insinuating  that  the 
whole  is  merely  an  address  to  the  credulity  of  mankind,  in 
which  believing  its  pretensions  is  made  a  substitute  for  piety 
and  morality.  The  evidences  of  our  holy  religion,  propos- 
ed in  the  introduction  of  this  trealiie,  are  a  sufficient  reply 

54 


42B 

to  the  former  insio nation.  The  gospel,  instead  of  decliuicg 
any  fair  scrutiny,  requires  of  its  disciples  the  most  rigorous 
investigation.  And  the  illustration  which  has  just  been  giv- 
en of  the  doctrine,  as  a  practical  principle  of  morals,  will 
rescue  it  from  the  obloquy  of  the  latter ;  and  will  vindicate 
the  reasonableness  of  building  the  whole  evangelic  system 
upon  this  foundation.  The  ground  on  which  the  sacred  wri- 
-ters  extol  this  grace  is,  not  that  its  merit  is  sufficient  to  sup- 
ply the  defect  of  every  other  virtue  :  but,  that  it  is  the  prop- 
er spring  of  all  true  virtue,  and  the  most  efficient  principle 
of  a  holy'  life.  Let  us  pursue  this  reflection  a  moment. 
We  may  lay  it  down  as  an  infallible  maxim  in  morals,  that 
right  principles  truly  understood,  and  firmly  believed,  will 
ever  be  followed  by  right  conduct,  and  that  false  principles, 
on  the  other  hand,  tend  to  vitiate  the  fountains  of  virtue 
and  piety  in  the  heart,  and  lead  to  many  pernicious  errors  in 
the  habits  of  life.  What  then  is  evangelic  faith,  but  em- 
bracing on  the  authority  of  a  divine  and  infallible  teacher, 
and  on  the  renewed  taste  of  a  mind  enlightened  by  the  in- 
spiration of  truth,  the  purest  principles  of  practical  virtue, 
the  holiest  law  of  universal  duty,  which  has  ever  been  pre- 
scribed to  mankind.  It  is  subjecting  the  soul  to  the  influence 
of  the  most  sublime  and  powerful  motives  of  holiness  which 
the  wisdom  of  God  has  ever  published  fo?  the  regeneratioyi 
of  the  world.  The  laws  of  morals,  as  they  have  been  pre- 
scribed in  the  systems  of  the  wisest  men  who  have  not  drawn 
them  from  the   fountains  of  inspiration,  are  susceptible  of 


t 


42r 

JK)  much  disputation,  and  are  liable,  in  their  application,  to 
30  many  exceptions  and  modifications,  in  favour  of  each 
man's  inclinations  or  interests,  that  they  form  a  most  uncer- 
tain and  fallacious  rule  of  duty.  It  is,  besides,  a  rule  as 
feeble  in  its  authority,  as  it  is  defective  in  its  prescriptions, 
being  liable  to  be  changed,  or  set  aside,  by  every  caprice  of 
self-love,  or  impulse  of  misguided  passion.  But  every  thing 
in  the  discipline  of  Christ,  is  clear  and  luminous  as  the  eter- 
nal laws  of  truth  from  which  it  emanates.  Here  are  no  en- 
feebling  doubts,  no  uncertain  reasonings  which  make  the  law 
too  often  speak  the  language  of  a  corrupted  heart.  Where, 
then,  can  be  found,  in  all  the  systems  of  human  wisdom, 
such  a  basis  of  morality  as  in  that  faith  which  is  the  practi- 
cal principle  of  the  gospel  of  Christ  ?  Has  any  philosophy, 
the  candid  unbeliever  himself  being  judge,  ever  taught  so 
pure  and  excellent  a  doctrine,  derived  it  from  so  sublime  a 
source,  enjoined  it  by  sanctions  so  weighty  and  important, 
or  added  to  it  the  force  of  obligations,  and  the  persuasion  of 
motives,  so  transcendent  in  their  nature,  and  fitted  to  interest 
all  the  best  powers  of  the  soul? — Such  are  the  moral  effects 
of  a  genuine  faith  in  the  gospel  of  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ, 
which,  in  the  esteem  of  every  candid  and  pious  mind,  will 
repel  all  the  contemptuous  sneers  of  infidelity,  and  vindicate 
the  high  place  which  it  holds  in  the  christian  dispensation. 
It  works  by  love,  and  purifies  the  heart.  It  is  the  com- 
mencement of  that  pure  and  heavenly  spirit,  which,  unfold- 


428 

ed  and  cherished  in  (he  regions  of  immortal  love,  will  be  the 
consummation  of  that  grace  wherein  we  now  stand. 

OTHER  DEFINITIONS  OF  FAITH. 

Before  dismissing  this  branch  of  the  subject,  let  me  take 
notice  of  some  defini(ions,  or  representations  of  this  grace, 
confessedly  just,  but  the  coincidence  of  which  with  the  views 
hitherto  presented  to  you,  may  not  immediately  appear. 
Sometimes  it  is  characterised  in  the  holy  scriptures  by 
one  of  its  principal  acts.  Abraham  is  said  to  have  be- 
lieved God,  and  it  was  accounted  to  him  for  righteousness. 
This  consequence  could  have  flowed  only  from  his  having 
trusted  implicitly  in  the  divine  promise,  in  opposition  to  the 
most  untoward  events,  and  to  appearances  that  might  have 
discouraged  the  strongest  hopes.  Such  confidence  in  the 
covenanted  promise  of  God  could  have  existed  only  in  a 
heart  prepared  to  receive,  with  submissive  duty,  every  part 
of  his  declared  will. 

Sometimes  it  is  designated  by  one  of  its  principal  objects ; 
as  in  the  command  of  the  apoille  to  the  jailor,  Believe  on  the 
Lord  Jesus  Christ.  In  another  circumstance,  the  same 
great  founder  of  the  christian  faith,  descending  to  an  idea 
still  more  particular,  says  ;  "  If  thou  shalt  confess  with  thy 
mouth  the  Lord  Jesus,  and  shalt  believe  in  thine  heart  that 
God  bath  raised  him  from  the  dead,  thou  shalt  be  saved,'^ 


fS^ 


9 


429 

The  doctrine  of  the  resurrection  of  Christ  is  so  intimately 
involved  with  the  accomplishnient  of  the  atonement,  and 
with  the  truth  of  all  the  promises  and  hopes  of  Christianity, 
that  sincerely  to  receive  this  glorious  truth  in  all  its  relations 
and  consequences,  is  to  embrace  the  whole  gospel. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  pious  and  learned  compilers 
of  the  confession  and  catechism  of  the  presbyterian  church 
have  chosen  to  describe  it  by  one  of  its  essential  and  insepa- 
rable consequences  ;  receiving  and  resting  upon  Christ 
alone  for  salvation.  Desiring  to  give  some  single  criterion  of 
this  grace  which  would  be  least  liable  to  be  mistaken  by  a  be- 
liever himself  in  judging  of  his  own  spiritual  state,  they  have 
fixed  on  this  self-renunciation,  and  this  absolute  dependence 
of  the  penitent  sinner  on  the  grace  and  merits  of  the  Saviour, 
as  one  that  is  most  certain,  because  one  to  whicii  the  pride, 
and  self-complacency  of  man  most  reluctantly  submits  :  one 
to  which  he  never  does  submit,  till  the  sense  of  his  own  un- 
worthiness  and  guilt, — of  the  purity,  holiness,  and  justice  of 
the  divine  law,— of  the  grace  of  the  Redeemer,  and  the 
all-suflScieucy  of  his  righteousness  for  the  satisfaction  of  the 
violated  law, — in  a  word,  till  the  whole  gospel  has  taken  full 
possession  of  his  soul. 


430 


OF    FALSE  RESEMBLANCES  OP  FAITH. 

Systematic  writers  on  the  subject  of  faith  present  to  us 
different  counterfeit  resemblances  of  this  grace,  which  it  is  of 
importance,  in  practice,  to  discriminate  from  the  genuine 
principle.  Among  them,  those  which  chiefly  require  our  no- 
tice, have  been  called  an  historical  faith,  and  a  temporary 
faith.  By  the  former  is  intended  that  assent  which  is  yield- 
ed to  the  truth  of  the  holy  scriptures  merely  through  custom, 
education,  and  sympathy  with  general  opinion  and  example. 
Or  it  may  embrace  that  which  arises  from  the  convictions  of 
the  understanding  yielded  to  a  rational  examination  of  the  ev- 
idences of  our  religion,  but  without  producing  that  discern- 
ment of  the  spiritual  beauty,  and  that  heartfelt  perception  of 
the  excellence  of  its  moral  and  divine  doctrines,  which  cre- 
ates a  fervent  love  of  the  truth,  and  begets  a  deep  and  per- 
sonal application  of  it  to  the  heart,  for  its  sanctification  and 
instruction  in  righteousness.  This  is  tha-t  faith,  if  it  deserve 
the  name,  which  fills  our  churches  with  formal,  indeed,  but 
cold  professors,  destitute  of  the  life  and  power  of  godliness. 
Which  occupies  the  garden  of  God  with  fair  and  sightly  trees 
that  put  forth  leaves  and  flowers,  but  bring  none  of  the  gen- 
uine fruits  of  holiness  to  perfection.  The  history  of  our  Sa- 
viour is,  to  them,  like  other  credible  narrations  of  ancient,  or 
of  distant  events,  and  generally  creates  as  little  interest  in 
the  heart. 


$ 


431 

On  tlie  other  hand,  that  which  is  improperly  calleil  a  /«m- 
porari/  failliy  is  usually  nothing  more  than  an  occasional,  and 
sometimes  constitutional  susceptibility  of  heart  on  religious 
subjects,  excited  by  a  variety  of  concurrent  circumstances  ; 
and,  like  other  transient  emotions,  passing  away  without  fruit, 
or  any  radical  change  of  character.  In  those  moments  of 
religious  feeling,  the  gospel  is  regarded  rather  as  a  system  of 
beneficence  to  (he  creature,  than  of  mercy  and  grace  to  the 
sinner.  The  sinner  is  prone  to  rejoice  in  the  ideas  of  the  di- 
vine benignity  ;  and  often  aielts  with  the  sympathetic  recol- 
tions  of  the  Saviour's  sufferings  and  love,  without  entering 
deeply  into  the  depravity  of  our  nature,  and,  from  the  heart, 
abhorring  its  corruptions.  He  perceives  the  triumphs,  not 
the  humility  of  religion.  The  consequence  is,  that,  not  duly 
sensible  of  the  evil  of  sin,  and  penetrated  with  the  sentiments 
of  repentance,  be  does  not  properly  regard  the  righteousness 
of  Christ  as  forming  the  sole  meritorious  title  of  our  accept- 
ance with  God.  When  the  passions  and  temptations  of  sin 
are  from  any  cause  suspended  in  their  actions,  mistaking  this 
temporary  quiet  for  the  change  of  heart  required  in  the  gospel, 
he  may  perceive  an  elevated  joy  in  the  hopes  of  eternal  life 
and  happinesss ;  but,  having  no  root  of  holiness  in  himself, 
when  persecution,  or  shame,  or  the  sacrifice  of  interest  or  of 
pleasure  is  to  be  encountered  for  the  sake  of  the  word,  bye 
and  bi/e  he  is  offended  ;  or,  when  the  transient  fit  of  religious 
sensibility  has  passed  off,  it  leaves  nothing  behind  it  but  the 
passions  of  the  world. 


432 

This  great  and  practical  principle  of  duly  is  aUempletl,  by 
different  writers,  to  be  analyzed  into  various  acts  concurring 
to  constitute  its  essence  ;  such  as  repentance  for  sin — a  de- 
sire to  glorify  God  through  Jesus  Christ— a  love  of  divine 
things— hungering  and  thirsting  after  righteousness — receiv- 
ing and  resting  upon  Christ  for  justification,  sanctification, 
and  complete  redemption.  These  acts  form  an  injudicious 
analysis  of  the  grace  of  faith.  They  are  natural  consequen- 
ces resulting  from  the  devout  and  humble  state  of  the  mind 
in  the  exercise  of  faith  ;  but  are  not  more  peculiarly  allied  to 
this  grace  than  to  other  principles  of  the  divine  life.  There 
is,  however,  a  discrimination  in  this  act,  according  to  its  de- 
grees of  clearness  and  strength,  into  a  weak  faith  diud  a  strong 
faith,  which  has  a  real  foundation  in  the  experience  of  good 
men.  And  the  holy  apostle  evidently  justifies  the  distinc- 
tion, speaking  of  some  of  his  converts  as  being  yet  only 
babes  in  Christ.  And,  in  his  second  epistle  to  the  Thessa- 
lonians,  exulting  in  the  faith  of  that  church  as  growing  ex- 
ceedingly; by  which  language  he  strongly  marks  a  progres- 
sion in  this  grace.  His  followers  at  Rome  he  exhorts  "  not  to 
think  more  highly  of  themselves  than  they  ought  to  think, 
but  to  think  soberly,  according  as  God  hath  dealt  to  every 
every  man  the  measure  of  faith." 


4dd 


IW  THE  FIRST  PLACE,  OF  A  WEAK  FAITH. 

This  title  implies  a  certain  feebleness  in  the  impressions 
which  divine  truth  makes  upon  the  mind,  so  that  it  does  not 
habitually  yield  that  clear  apprehension  of  its  nature,  and  firm 
persuasion  of  its  glorious  reality,  which  raises  the  believer, 
at  all  times,  above  the  seductive  influence  of  the  world,  and 
gives  him  that  lively  sense  of  his  interest  in  the  atonement 
and  intercession  of  Christ  which  contributes,  in  the  highest 
degree,  to  his  comfort  in  the  divine  hfe,  and  to  the  most  use- 
ful discharge  of  his  various  duties.  This  feeble  habit  of  re- 
ligious feeling,  may  arise  from  tlifferent  causes,  which  will 
naturally  display  themselves  in  proportionally  ditlerent  ef- 
fects upon  the  character  and  manners.  Sometimes  it  springs 
from  a  natural  imbecility  of  mind  in  conceiving  its  ideas ;  and, 
at  other  times,  from  possessing  only  narrow  views,  and  very 
limited  opportunities  of  information.  The  consequence  of 
which,  usually,  is  an  unhappy  mixture  of  low  and  super- 
stitious ideas  and  practices  with  the  better  principles  of  re- 
ligion. Not  unfrequently,  it  is  derived  from  certain  errors  in 
principle,  which  occasion  the  forms,  and  the  external  dutie3 
of  religion  to  be  too  much,  or  too  little  regarded ;  either  ab- 
sorbing the  heart  in  its  ceremonial,  or,  by  a  pretended  supe- 
riority to  outward  form,  withdrawing  from  the  weakness  of 
human  nature  the  aids  which  have  always  been  found  neces- 
sary for  preserving  alive  the  warmth  and  vigour  of  pious  af- 


4«i4 

tectiou.  By  suflfering  certain  habits  of  conformity  to  the 
world  to  grow  up  in  the  heart  unobserved,  we  soraelimes  see 
a  state  of  manners  gradually  introduced,  unfriendly  to  the 
cultivation  of  the  divine  life,  and  of  that  strictness  of  walk, 
and  purity  of  conversation  before  God,  which  is  most  edi- 
fying to  the  church,  and  becoming  the  gravity  of  the  chris- 
tian profession.  Too  often  a  weak  faith  may  be  occasioned 
by  peculiar  temptations,  against  which  a  christian  has  not 
been  sufficiently  on  his  guard ;  or  it  may  grow  out  of  cei> 
tain  habitual  situations  in  life  wherein  so  many  worldly  en- 
gagements and  avocations  press  upon  his  attention,  as  un- 
happily to  occupy  a  great  portion  of  that  time  which  ought 
to  be  devoted  to  the  studies,  meditations,  and  duties  of  piety. 
The  strength  of  his  faith  will,  in  this  case,  often  be  little  su- 
perior to  the  inSuence  of  the  world,  and  will  be  a  feeble  prin- 
ciple either  of  comfort  to  his  own  soul,  or  of  advancement  in 
the  habits  of  holy  living.  On  particular  occasions,  sin  may 
have  surprised  the  vigilance  of  the  most  sincere  and  humble 
believer,  and  so  distressed  his  conscience,  that  he  cannot 
discern  in  himself  any  satisfactory  evidences  of  his  peculiar 
relation  to  Christ.  In  other  instances,  a  constitutional  glooms 
iness  of  mind  inclines  some  good  men  habitually  to  contem- 
plate the  spiritual  state  of  their  own  souls  in  an  unfavourable 
light.  They  entertain  no  doubt,  indeed,  of  the  truths  of  the 
gospel.  They  may  regard  them  with  the  highest  veneratioa 
and  affection.  Firmly  believing  the  general  principle  of  the 
power  and  grace  of  God,  they  cannot,  however,  in  the  afflicting 


435 

darkness  of  their  minds,  discern  their  own  privilege  to  ap- 
propriate the  gracious  promise  of  the  covenant  to  themselves. 
It  is  not  of  the  mercy,  or  the  promise  of  God,  that  they  en- 
tertain any  doubt ;  but  of  themselves.     They  lose  the  coal- 
forts  of  a  composed  and  settled  state  of  piety  and  devotion  5 
and  that  time  is  often  spent  in  gloomy  retreat,  and  anxious 
conflicts  with  their  own  hearts,  which  would  be  better  em- 
ployed in  active  duty.     Active  duty  is  the  best  mean  of  re- 
moving the  doubts  of  humble  piety,  by  giving  to  the  true  be- 
liever the  best  evidences  of  a  regenerate  and  sanctified  prin- 
ciple of  action.     In  retirement,  the  mind  often  broods  over 
its  own  evils,  and  increases  the  gloom  which  induces  it  to 
court  seclusion  from  the  world.     There  are  two  acts,  how- 
ever, by  which  the  sincerity  of  the  weakesmiith  may  be  de- 
monstrated.    The  one  is  humility,  under  a  deep  sense  of  the 
evil  of  sin,  and  of  the  imperfection  of  our  own  righteousness, 
producing  unceasing  desire  of  an  interest  in  the  redemption 
purchased  by  Christ  Jesus.     The  other  is  an  earnest  en- 
deavour to  render  that  interest  clear  to  the  heart,  by  the  faith- 
ful discharge  of  every  duty,  and  a  constant  study  to  glorify 
God   by  holiness  of  living,  and  universal  obedience  to  his 
will.     Where  these  characters  exist  in  sincerity,  faith,  al- 
though it  may  be  feeble,  is  still  genuine,  and  the  believer 
may  be  truly  an  heir  of  eternal  life  ;  although,  dubious  and 
uncertain  of  his  relation  to  Christ,  his  mind  may  be  often 
covered  with  darkness  and  perplexity. 


436 


OF  A  STRONG  FAITH. 


This  exercise  of  the  soul  implies  such  a  clear,  deep,  and 
habitual  persuasion  of  divine  truth  as  easily  overcomes  the 
undue  and  seductive  influence  of  worldly  things.  And  the 
habitual  warmth  of  its  devotion,  and  its  zeal  in  promoting,  as 
far  as  its  power  extends,  the  interests  of  the  Redeemer's 
kingdom,  impart  such  internal  evidence  of  sincerity,  as  leaves 
no  doubt  or  hesitancy,  in  the  most  humble  believer,  in  ap- 
propriating the  free  and  gracious  provisions  of  the  gospel. 
Confiding  in  the  amplitude  and  riches  of  divine  grace,  and  the 
faithfulness  of  the  divine  promise,  he  enjoys  such  a  serene 
and  stedfast  assurance  of  faith,  as  frequently  enables  him,  in 
the  language  of  the  apostle,  to  rejoice  with  joy  unspeakable 
and  full  of  glory.  This  calm  and  settled  confidence  in  the 
security  of  his  spiritual  state,  and  interest  in  the  covenanted 
mercy  of  God,  forms  one  of  the  distinguishing  characters  of  a 
strong  faith,  and  enables  the  believer  to  discharge  his  duty 
with  the  greater  comfort,  and  to  fulfil  its  labours,  and  endure 
its  trials,  with  the  greater  constancy  and  fortitude.  Job  pre- 
sents an  interesting  example  of  this  faith,  in  his  devout  and  fer- 
vent exclamation,  /  know  that  my  Redeemer  liveth,  and 
though^  after  my  skin,  worms  destroy  this  body,  yet,  in  my 
flesh,  I  shall  see  God,  This  also  is  that  degree  of  faith 
testified  by  the  apostle  Paul  in  the  following  language :  Iknom 
in  whom  I  have  trusted,  and  am  persuaded  that  fie  is  able 


43? 

to  keep  that  which  I  have  committed  to  him  against  that  day 
It  is  the  same  which,  in  another  place,  he  calls  iliefuU  as- 
surance  of  faith.  To  it,  likewise,  the  prophet  Isaiah  seems 
to  allude,  in  an  expression  that  deserves  to  be  explained— 
Let  liim  take  hold  of  my  strength  that  he  may  make  peace 
Tvith  me ,-  alluding  evidently  to  the  privilege  which  certain 
criminals  enjoyed  of  fleeing,  and  taking  hold  of  the  horns, 
which  were  the  strength  of  the  altar,  in  order  to  escape  the 
stroke  of  vengeance  or  of  justice.  The  obvious  interpreta- 
tion of  which  language  is — let  him,  with  confidence,  trust  my 
power  to  save,  and  therein  enjoy  the  security  of  my  protec- 
tion. 

There  is,  indeed,  a  confidence  of  salvation,  and  a  joy  aris- 
ing out  of  this  assurance  which  the  hypocrite  may  taste  as 
well  as  the  believer,  and,  sometimes,  in  a  higher  degree. 
But  these  affections  may  be  discriminated  from  each  other, 
by  considering  the  necessary  effects,  and  certain  fruits,  of  a 
genuine  faith.  Believing  the  entire  corruption  of  our  nature, 
it  produces  the  deepest  humiliation  before  God.  The  joy 
of  the  hypocrite,  on  the  other  hand,  begets  an  exultation  of 
heart,  in  which  little  of  the  true  humility  of  repentance  is  to 
be  found.  To  the  believer,  the  goodness  and  mercy  of  God, 
to  a  sinner  so  unworthy,  occasions  the  profoundest  self-abase- 
ment ;  in  the  hypocrite  it  creates  an  unreasonable  estimation 
of  himself,  and  a  pharisaic  self-complacency  in  the  idea  that 
fa€  is  better  than  others.     The  one,  although  his  own  happi- 


438 

ness  contributes  greatly  to  heighten  his  joy  of  faith,  rejoices 
chiefly  in  the  beauty  of  holiness  ;  to  the  other,  his  own  feli- 
city is  the  principal  consideration  in  those  triumphs  which 
at  some  times  occupy  and  elevate  his  soul.  The  one  loves 
God  supremely  for  the  holiness  of  his  nature ;  the  other  is 
soothed  by  a  flattering  self-complacency,  in  being  distinguish- 
ed as  a  peculiar  object  of  divine  favour. 

Br  WHAT  VIRTUE  IN  FAITH   IS  IT  THAT  IT  CONFERS  A 
BIGHT  TO  THE   BLESSINGS  OF  THE  COVENANT. 

Having  before  pointed  faith  out  as  the  condition  of  the 
covenant  of  grace,  I  will  noW-  consider  a  question  which  aris- 
es in  consequence,  and  is  often  asked,  by  what  virtue  in 
that  grace  is  it  that  all  the  rich  and  unmerited  blessings  of 
the  covenant  are  freely  conferred  on  the  unworthiness  of  the 
believing  sinner? — Several  figurative  expressions  found  in 
the  holy  scriptures,  or  employed  on  this  subject  by  various 
divines,  have  been  resorted  to  as  suggesting  the  proper  an* 
swer.  But  all  this  kind  of  imagery,  serves  rather  to  amuse 
the  imagination,  than  to  afford  satisfaction  to  the  judgment. 
Faith  has  been  said,  for  example,  to  act  as  the  hand  which, 
by  accepting  the  mercies  freely  proffered  to  the  believing 
sinner,  constitutes,  according  to  the  tenor  of  the  covenant, 
his  lawful  title  of  possession.  Other  figures  exhibit  the  be- 
liever as  taking  refuge  in  Jesus  Christ,  as  a  harrassed  pil- 
grim, beneath  a  secure  covert  from  the  tempest,  or  a  defence- 


439 

less  man,  behind  his  shield,  from  the  dart  of  an  enemy. 
These  may  term  agreeable  images  in  eloquent  discourse,  but 
do  not  explain  the  subject  to  the  understanding.  The  effi- 
cacy of  faith  does  not  arise  from  any  natura),  or  necessary 
virtue  in  this  act  of  the  mind  to  merit,  or  procure  the  bless- 
ing, but  from  the  good  pleasure  of  God,  and  the  merciful 
constitution  of  the  covenant  of  grace. — To  render  the  sub- 
ject more  obvious,  I  lay  down  the  following  proposilions. 
God  infinitely  merciful  delights  not  in  the  misei-y  of  the  of-, 
fender.  ^  His  supreme  felicity  consists  in  imparting  happi- 
ness to  all  who  can  be  made  to  enjoy  it  in  consistency  with 
the  holy  perfections  of  his  nature,  or,  in  other  words,  with 
the  eternal  and  necessary  laws  of  the  moral  universe.  Hav- 
ing been  pleased  that  the  indispensible  claims  of  his  justice 
should  be  satisfied  by  the  sacrifice  of  the  cross,  he  now  on- 
ly wants  a  fit  subject  of  his  mercy,  most  freely  to  bestow  it. 
Faith  possesses  this  virtue,  that,  by  the  belief  of  the  gra- 
cious  truths,  and  promises  of  the  gospel,  it  becomes,  the 
most  efficient  principle  of  the  regeneration  and  sanctification 
of  our  nature.  The  proper  efficacy  of  faith  then  is,  that  it 
prepares  the  aoul  to  be  a  fit  recipient  of  those  blessings 
which  the  infinite  benevolence  of  the  Deity  is  ever  willing  to 
confer  on  those  who  know  how  to  value  them,  and  are  quali- 
fied to  enjoy  them.  All  the  mercies  of  the  gospel  are 
transferred  to  the  believer  through  Jesus  Christ,  through 
whom  il  has  become  just  in  God  to  justify  the  sinner. 
Such  being  the  constitution  of  the  covenant  of  grace. 


440 

faith  hath  been  made  the  principle  of  a  moral  and  legal  union 
with  Christ,  so  that  all  his  merits  are  imputed  to  the  believ- 
er, and  become  his  title  with  divine  justice,  as  if  he  were 
one  with  the  Redeemer.  This  union  is  represented  in  the 
holy  scriptures  under  different  images  which  indicate  it  to  be 
of  the  most  intimate  kind.  It  is  the  union  of  the  members 
with  the  head — the  connexion  of  the  branches  with  the  vine 
•—the  junction  of  the  whole  building  with  the  corner  stone 
upon  which  it  rests.  Expressions  which  convey,  in  lively- 
figures,  the  relation  of  believers  to  Christ  through,  faith,  and 
the  intimacy  of  union  which  subsists  between  them. — Such 
is  the  virtue  of  the  grace  of  faith,  on  which  it  becomes  a  ra- 
tional, as  it  is  acknowledged  to  be  the  scriptural  ground  of 
bestowing  on  the  believer  all  the  blessings  of  the  New  Cove- 
nant. 


OF    THE 

EXTERNAL  SEALS 

OF   THE 

COVENANT  OF  GRACE 


As  God  has  been  pleased  to  exhibit  his  grace  to  the  world 
iinder  the  idea  of  a  covenant  which  he  condescends  to  enter 
Into  with  the  penitent  and  believing  sinner,  and  provisionally 
offers  to  all  who,  by  the  gospel,  are  called  from  among  our 
fallen  and  corrupted  race,  to  seek  the  inheritance  of  eternal 
life,  v»'e  have  just  ground  to  expect  that  every  ordinary  form; 
which  usage  has  annexed  to  a  transaction  of  this  kind  among 
men,  will  be  preserved  in  this  appointment  of  God.  There- 
fore, to  the  gracious  protnise  of  the  covenant,  which,  as  has 
before  been  shewn,  constitutes  its  essence,  he  has  annexed 
his  seal,  in  order  to  add  greater  authenticity  to  this  object 
of  our  faith,  and  give  it  a  more  affecting  impression  on  the 
heart. 


COVENANT    OF    GRACE. 

A  seal  is  usually,  any   emblemal.c  symbol  employed  in 

consequence  of  the  agreemeni   oi  parties,  or  appomled  by 

56 


442 

public  authorily,  to  be  a  sign,  and  memorial  of  consent  in 
covenants,  or  an  aulhenlic  testimonial,  that  any  transaction 
into  which  we  have  entered,  is  our  own  act.     For  the  same 
purpose,  in  the  early  and  rude  ages,  parties  forming  a  8ol« 
emn  compact  frequently  erected  a  pillar  as  a  permanent  me- 
morial of  the  fact,  or,  more  solemnly,  built  an  altar,  con6rm» 
ing  their  paction  by  an  act  of  religion.     Often  they  gave  a 
small  portion  of  the  soil  which  was  transferred  by  the  con-    , 
tract,  a  penny  of  the   sum  which  was  to  be  paid,  or  some  I 
earnest  or  pledge  of  possession  or  fulfilment  of  the  covenant.    | 
All  these  acts  were  of  the  nature  of  seals.     In  ages  more  re- 
fined  instead  of  these  rude  devices,  some  hieroglyphic  or 
symbolic  representation  was  added  to  written  contracts  for 
the  same  purpose.      In  the  church  God  has  instituted  sym- 
bolical actions,  by  which  the  Covenant  of  Grace  is  visibly 
ratified,  when  he  offers  it  to  the  acceptance  of  believers  and 
their  offspring,  as  in  the  ordinance  of  baptism  ;  or  by  Avhich 
they  solemnly  declare  their  acceptance  of  its  terms,  as  in  the 
Lord's  Supper.      Baptism  may  be  called  the  hieroglyphic, 
or  symbol  of  regeneration  ;  as  the  Lord's  Supper  is  of  the 
sacrifice  of  our  redemption,  and  of  the  charity  which  should 
unite  believers  in  love  to  their  common  Lord,  and  to  one  an* 
other.     These  actions,  therefore  from  their  nature,  and  from 
the  uses  to  which  they  are  applied,  partake  of  the  essence 
of  seals. 


■■:^% 


443 

Their  being  appointed  by  Almighty  God  to  be  employed 
as  seals  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  may  be  further  establish- 
ed, from  the  express  words  of  the  apostle,  by  whom  cir- 
cumcision is  styled,  a  seal  of  the  righteousness  which  is  by 
faith ;  Rom.  iv.  1 1  :  and  from  the  analogy  which  subsists 
between  the  ordinances  of  baptism  and  circumcision.  Both 
are  emblems  of  purification  ;  bo(h  administered  on  the  con- 
dition of  believing  the  promise  of  God  in  the  Messiah  ;  both 
are  the  external  sign  and  confirmation  of  this  failh  ;  and  both 
are  applied,  as  shall  be  shewn,  hereafter,  for  attaining  all  the 
gracious  purposes  of  the  covenant  to  believers,  and  to 
their  infant  seed.  And  this  style  has  been  used,  with  respect 
to  baptism  in  particular,  by  the  earliest  writers  in  the  chris- 
tian church  ;  and  by  those  who  were  cotemporary  with,  or 
who  immediately  succeeded  the  apostles. 

OTHER  DENOMINATIONS  APPLIED  TO  THEM* 

Besides  the  denominations  which  these  ordinances  have 
respectively  received,  arising  from  circumstances  peculiar 
(o  each ;  such  as  the  regeneration  of  water  applied  to  bap- 
tism, and  the  eucharist,  and  communion  applied  to  the  Lord's 
Supper,  they  have,  from  the  earliest  ages,  been  entitled 
mysteries  and  sacraments.  The  former  term  was  borrowed 
from  the  pagan  worship,  and  cherished  by  the  converts  from 
that  superstition,  through  a  natural  attachment  to  ancient 
forms  and  usages,  from  which  cause  it  was  early  introduced 


444 

into  the  temples  of  Christianity.  The  sublime  principles  of 
natural  religion  which  were  discovered  by  the  philosophers, 
or  had  been  handed  down  by  tradition  from  the  remotest  anti- 
quity, and  preserved  in  their  temples  by  their  priests,  who 
had  mingled  them,  however,  with  the  grossest  superstitions 
of  the  vulgar,  were  considered  as  too  elevated  for  the  popu- 
lar understanding.  They  were  separated,  therefore,  from  the 
common  mass  of  pagan  doctrines,  and  reserved  to  be  commu- 
nicated only  to  a  few  men  whose  rank  gave  them  superior 
means  of  information,  or  who  had  rendered  themselves  wort(hy 
the  distinctroQ  by  eminent  virtue  and  prudence.  When 
men  of  this  character  offered  themselves  to  the  college  which 
presided  over  the  public  religion,  they  were,  with  great  so- 
lemnity introduced  into  the  recesses  of  their  temples,  and 
there  instructed  in  those  theological  principles  which  it  was 
supposed  the  body  of  the  people  were  not  capable  of  under- 
standing, or  were  not  worthy  to  receive.  Those  who  were 
thus  instructed  were  called  the  initiated^  and  the  rites  ac- 
companying these  instructions,  were  named  mysteries,  from 
a  Greek  term  implying  silence,  because  they  respected  doc- 
trines which  were  not  to  be  communicated  to  the  people. 
And  the  initiated  were  laid  under  the  most  sacred  obligations 
not  to  reveal  aught,  which  passed  on  those  occasions,  within 
their  temples.  Since  the  sacraments  of  the  christian  church 
were  designed,  in  like  manner,  to  discriminate  the  faithful  from 
the  profane,  and  were  not  to  be  imparted  promiscuously,  but 
reserved  for  those  only  who  had  attained  a  spiritual,  and  sub-* 


limer  knowledge  of  its  principles,  which  the  world  did  not 
enjoj,  they  were,  in  allusion  to  the  mysteries  of  their  an- 
cient  temples,  which  had  acquired  their  early  reverence, 
and  were  held  in  great  veneration  throughout  the  Roman 
empire,  called  by  the  same  name. 

The  denomination  of  sacrament  has  a  different  origin.  It 
was  the  military  oath  among  the  Romans,  by  which  the  sol- 
diers plighted  their  allegiance  to  their  general,  or  to  the  em- 
peror. And  as  the  christian  life  has  been  styled  a  warfare, 
in  which  the  believer  contends  not  only  against  spiritual  ene- 
mies, but  often,  especially  in  that  early  age,  was  exposed 
to  the  most  formidable  dangers,  he  is  justly  said  to  pledge 
himself,  in  these  ordinances,  to  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  as 
the  captain  of  his  salvation  ;  to  fight  under  his  banner ; 
to  endure,  in  his  service,  every  trial ;  and  to  expose  him- 
self, if  necessary,  to  danger,  and  to  death.  And  the  primi- 
live  christians,  in  the  immediate  prospect  of  great  conflicts, 
and  of  persecution,  often  renewed,  by  these  holy  rites,  their 
vows  of  fidelity  to  their  Lord,  and  reanimated  their  courage 
in  suffering ;  especially  by  the  sacrament  of  the  Lord's  sup- 
per. The  term  sacrament  is  not  found  among  the  writers  of 
the  New  Testament ;  it  was,  however,  very  early  adopted 
by  the  first  christians.  The  apostles  having  represented 
the  service  of  the  cross  under  allusions  borrowed  from  a  state 
of  warfare,  and  their  followers  finding,  in  painful  experience, 
^-he  perils  and  sufferings  they  were  compelled  to  endure,  soon 


•Ik 


446 

applied  to  (he  vows  by  which  they  devoted  themselves  to 
their  Redeemer,  a  title  so  familiar  to  them  in  the  military  life. 

THE  DESIGN  OF  THE  EXTERNAL  SEALS  OF  THE  COVENANT. 

It  is  of  importance  to  every  christian  distinctly  to  understand 
Uie  import  of  his  public  use  of  the  seals  of  the  Covenant,  and 
of  the  obligations  which  he  imposes  on  his  soul  by  this  solemn 
act.  Annexing  our  seal  to  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  or  using 
the  seal  which  God  has  appointed,  necessarily  implies  our  full 
belief  of  the  precious  doctrines  involved  in  that  covenant,  and 
a  hearty  acquiescence  in  all  its  conditions.  It  implies,  at  the 
same  time,  a  vow  of  consecration,  by  which  he  renews  his 
self-devotion  to  the  service  of  God  through  Jesus  Christ. 
And,  lastly,  it  implies,  with  regard  to  the  believer  himself, 
a  personal  ratification  of  the  Covenant,  on  his  part,  by  a  sen- 
sible symbol  calculated  more  strongly  to  authenticate  the 
transaction— to  assist  faith  by  the  co-operation  of  sense — to 
fix  a  deeper  impression  on  the  heart,  thereby  confirming  the 
purposes  of  duty,  and  leaving  a  more  awful  testimony  for 
God,  if  he  should  afterwards  prove  unfaithful  to  this  most  sa- 
cred of  our  duties  in  the  church, 

THE  DIFFERENT  IMPORT  OF  THE  TWO  SEALS. 

The  ordinances  of  baptism,  and  the  Lord's  supper,  being 
both  regarded  as  the  seals  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace,  it  is 


^47 

accessary,  with  particular  care,  to  attend  to  the  proper  dk- 
tinciion  existing  between  them.  The  former  may  be  regard- 
ed chiefly  as  the  seal  annexed  immediately  by  God,  through 
his  publir.  servants  in  the  church,  to  this  covenant,  to  give  it 
authenticity,  and  to  ratify  it  on  his  part  to  his  people.  The 
latter  may  be  considered  principally  as  the  seal  annexed  by 
the  believer  to  the  same  covenant,  confirming  his  acceptance 
of  its  terms,  and  laying  his  soul,  by  that  act,  under  the  most 
sacred  obligations  of  obedience.  A  covenant,  being  a  mutual 
stipulation,  requires,  in  order  to  its  completion,  the  seals  of 
the  respective  parties.  God,  by  the  ministry  of  his  servants, 
who  are  officers  in  his  church,  annexes  his  own  seal  in 
baptism  ;  and  in  the  communion  of  the  body  and  blood  of  the 
Lord,  the  believer  personally  affixes  his  seal  to  the  same  in- 
strument. The  veracity  of  God,  indeed,  needs  no  such  ad- 
ventitious confirmation.  But  as  he  has  been  pleased  so  far 
to  adapt  himself  to  the  weakness  of  human  nature,  which  is 
ever  strongly  moved  by  sensible  impressions,  he  has  not  only 
offered  his  grace  to  the  world  in  the  form  which  takes  place 
in  covenant  transactions  among  men,  but  confirmed  it,  accord- 
ing to  the  same  customs,  by  the  legal  and  authoritative  sanc- 
tion of  a  seal.  That  baptism  is  to  be  viewed  chiefly  as  the 
seal  of  God  affixed  to  his  own  covenant,  may  be  concluded, 
not  only  from  the  ordinary  forms  of  this  instrument,  but  from 
its  analogy  to  circumcision,  in  the  room  of  which  rite  it  has 
manifestly  been  substituted.  The  apostle  declares  that  Abra- 
ham received,  frooa  God,  circumcision,  «  seal  of  the  right 


44g 

eousness  which  is  by  faith;  that  is,  a  sign  and  assurance  that, 
through  the  Redeeoier,  he  would  accept  the  righteousness  of 
faith  instead  of  the  perfect  obedience  of  the  original  law  of 
works.  You  observe  the  style  of  the  expression  : — The 
seal  of  circumcision  he  received  from  God  confirming  this 
gracious  privilege  to  the  believing  patriarch.  It  is  not  said 
that  he  gave  this  rite  or  seal  as  a  pledge  of  his  own  obedience. 

The  intention  of  the  rite  is  justly  argued  from  its  being  ap- 
plied to  the  infant  offspring  of  Abraham  as  it  is  now  admin- 
istered to  the  children  of  christian  parents  who  are  (he  spir- 
itual seed  of  Abraham.  Infants,  of  this  tender  age,  are  not 
capable  of  any  covenant  transaction  by  themselves,  and  in 
their  own  name  ;  but  they  are  susceptible  of  provisional  and 
covenanted  blessings  through  their  parents  from  the  infinite 
Author  of  all  mercy  and  grace.  And  surely  it  is  a  blessing; 
and  an  act  of  grace  of  the  first  magnitude,  in  God,  to  meet 
us  who  were  heirs  of  death,  at  our  entrance  into  the  world, 
by  the  provisional  propositions  of  salvation  through  Jesus 
Christ,  visibly  ratified  under  the  seal  of  that  covenant  which 
cancels  the  condemnation  of  the  violated  law,  and  places  us 
by  this  act,  publicly  and  solemnly  under  the  dispensation  of 
mercy  in  the  New  Covenant  established  with  the  second 
Adam. 

I  add,  that,  although  baptism  is  to  be  regarded  chiefly  as 
the  seal  of  God,  which  he  visibly  and  publicly  annexes  by 


449 

the  cliurcb,  to  his  own  proHTers  of  mercy ;  yet^  as  (he  rites  of 
religion  may,  freqiienlly,  be  taken  in  a  double  sense,  this  or- 
dinance as  it  respects  the  act  of  the  parent,  maV  be  viewed 
also  as  liis  own  seal,  by  which  he  declares  his  belief,  and  ac- 
ceptance of  the  covenant,  i(s  promises,  conditions  and  duties 
on  his  own  behalf — his  choice  of  its  blessings  as  the  portion 
of  his  child — and  his  consecration  of  hiu.self,  and  his  prC" 
cious  offspring,  to  the  glory  and  service  of  Almighty  God. 

1.  Baptism  is  our  christian  circumcision,  a  seal  of  the 
righteousness  which  is  by  faith.  But  that  we  may  have  a 
clearer  view  of  the  nature  and  importance  of  this  ordinance, 
we  must  go  back  to  the  origin  of  its  type  in  the  ancient 
church.  When  religious  truth  was  likely  to  perish  from  the 
world,  which,  in  a  few  ages  after  the  deluge,  was  overwhelm- 
ed in  idolatry,  and  sunk  in  extreme  dissolution  of  manners, 
it  pleased  God,  nearly  in  the  beginning  of  that  general  dark- 
ness and  corruption,  to  establish  a  church  in  which  he  might 
preserve  the  knowledge  of  his  name,  and  deposit  his  holy 
oracles  with  the  future  hopes  of  the  universe.  This  church 
consisted,  in  the  beginning,  of  the  single  family  of  Abraham, 
with  whom  he  entered  into  a  gracious  covenant,  accepting, 
as  his  title  to  eternal  life,  the  righteousness  of  faith  in  the  fu- 
ture Saviour,*  who  was  to  spring  from  his  own  loins  ;  engag- 


■*This  is  fr^Irly  inferred  from  the  expression  of  the  apostle,  \\  ho  styles  the  ?rt1 
of  the  Abraharaic  Covenant  the  aeal  of  the  rigkttffusness  which  is  by/aith, 
.        57 


450 

iDg  that  "  be  would  be  a  God  to  biai,  and  to  bis  seed  aflcr 
hiiii ;"  and  promising  fbat,  fmallj,  in  bim  all  the  families  of 
the  earth  should  be  blessed  by  the  Advent  of  tbe  Messiah. 
T  bat  this  grace  might  be  rendered  the  more  sure,  and  that  the 
faith  of  this  chosen  friend  of  God  might  have  the  firmer 
ground  on  which  to  rest,  he  added  to  bis  promise  his  sacra- 
mental seal  or  oath,  that,  by  iivo  immiUablc  things  in  which 
it  was  impossible  for  God  to  lie,  Abraham^  and  all  Trho  fol- 
low the  faith  of  Abraham,  might  have  strong  consolation, 
who  have  fled  for  refuge  to  lay  hold  of  the  hope  set  before 
them.  For,  saith  the  apostle,  Abraham  received  circum' 
cision  a  seal  of  the  righteousness,  that  is,  of  the  means  of 
justification  and  acceptance  with  God,  rvhich  is  by  faith. — 
This  covenant,  with  all  its  appendages  of  rites  and  forms,  of 
types  and  symbols,  of  prophets  and  priests,  of  altars  and  vic- 
tims, with  all  its  doctrines,  its  precepts,  and  its  promises,  was 
placed  in  the  keeping  of  the  church,  for  its  consolation,  for 
its  instruction  in  righteousness,  and  for  the  quickening  and 
direction  in  the  divine  life  of  all  true  believers.  If  we  ask, 
then,  with  the  apostle,  what  proBt  is  there  of  circumcision  ? 
the  answer  will  yield  some  useful  lights  on  this  subject.  It 
is  the  seal  which  God  has  been  pleased  to  annex  to  the  pro- 
positions of  his  mercy,  by  which  anciently  he  confirmed  to 
the  church  the  great  charter  of  her  spiritual  privileges,  and 
whicTi,  being  impressed  on  every  Israelite,  continually  re- 
minded him  of  his  obligations — continually  placed  before  him 
his  duties,  and  his  immortal  hopes— -assured  him  of  the  gra- 


451 

cious  protection  of  Almighty  God,  anil  designatet]  bim  as  a 
memJjer  of  that  chosen  community  to  whose  pious  custody 
were  committed  his  holy  oracles,  those  precious  treasures  of 
divine  truth.  While  other  nations  were  left  to  the  obscure 
teacJiings.  of  nature,  and  the  errors  of  a  depraved  reason,  ibis 
Bealed  nation  were  made  the  depositaries  of  clearer  lights, 
and  the  heirs  of  sublimer  hopes.  The  emblems  which  were 
engraven,  if  I  may  speak  so,  on  that  seal,  I  mean  the  blood 
of  circumcision,  corresponding  with  the  water  of  baptism, 
pointed  to  that  purity  of  heart  which  is  the  end  of  all  true 
religion ;  and  to  that  precious  blood,  which  is,  at  once,  the 
purchase  of  our  salvation,  and  the  tbuntain  in  which  all  our 
sins  are  cleansed.  Such  was  the  benefit  of  this  ancient  rite 
to  the  church  founded  in  Abraham,  and  afterwards  embracing 
all  the  posterity  of  Israel :  to  them  were  committed  the  ora- 
cles of  God  with  ail  their  lights,  their  hopes,  their  graces,  their 
means  of  holiness  and  of  eternal  life. 

These  brief  expositions  will  afford  some  principles  by 
which  to  explain  the  nature  and  the  benefits  of  that  baptismal 
rite  which  Christ  has  substituted  in  the  room  of  the  Abra- 
hamic  and  Mosaic  symbol  of  the  promise.  Baptism  is  our 
christian  circumcision ;  the  seal  of  a  more  pure  and  luminous 
dispensation  of  the  covenant  than  that  either  of  Moses,  or  of 
Abraham.  And  it  is  with  the  view  of  proposing,  as  far  as  I 
am  able,  some  precise  and  definite  ideas  on  this  initiating  in* 
stitution  of  the  christian  church,  that  I  have  made  these  pre- 


452 

hiory  observations  ou  the  corresponding  rite  of  the  preced- 
ing dispeusalion. 

That  I  may  give  as  much  perypicuity  and  precision  as  pos- 
sible to  our  ideas  concerning  this  holy  ordinance^  it  will  be 
necessary  to  go  into  some  details  concerning  its  original  in- 
stitution and  design,  and  its  proper  subjects ;  because  with 
these  its  benefits  are  intimately  connected,  and  from  them  its 
duties  and  obligations  immediately  result. 

1.  The  nature  and  design  of  baptism  may  be  rendered  ob- 
vious from  two  sources  of  illustration  ;  one  is  the  use  and  ap- 
plication of  a  similar  rite  which  was  frequent  in  the  ancient 
Jewish  and  Greek  nations,  whence,  probably,  it  was  trans- 
feri*ed  into  the  christian  church  ;  the  other  is  the  denomina- 
tion, borrowed  from  the  Abrahamic  dispensation  of  the  cove- 
nant, which,  from  the  very  first  ages,  it  has  received  among 
christians,  of  a  seed  of  the  Covenant  of  Grace. 

Many  of  the  great  and  distinguished  teachers,  and  founders 
of  sects  among  the  Jews,  applied  baptism  as  a  right  of  initia- 
tion into  their  respective  schools.  It  was  a  symbol  of  disci- 
pleship,  and  regarded  as  an  emblem  of  that  purify  of  mind^ 
;and  that  virtuous  simplicity  of  manners,  which  spring  from 
the  love  of  truth,  and  are  expected  in  all  those  who  are  en- 
gaged in  the  pursuit  of  wisdom.  Such  was,  probably,  the 
Cleaning  of  the  baptism  of  John,  the  great  forerunner  of  the 


453 

;Vlessiah.*  He  taught  a  new  and  more  rigorous  diaclpline 
of  repentance  than  was  known  to  the  Jews  of  that  age.  And 
the  disciples  who  followed  him,  ad^iiring  the  sanctity  of  his 
doctrine  and  the  abstemious  purify  of  his  manners,  he  ini- 
tiated by  baptism,t  preparing  them,  in  this  manner,  for  that 
still  more  pure  and  perfect  discipline  which  was  shortly  to  be 
introduced  by  the  Saviour  of  the  world.  It  was,  besides,  re- 
quired by  the  customs  of  that  nation,  that  all  proselytes  from 
among  the  Gentiles  should  be  initiated  into  the  church  of  Is- 
rael and  make  their  profession  of  the  doctrines  of  Moses,  and 
the  prophets,  by  baptism. 

The  ordinance  of  baptism,  therefore,  considered  simply  in 
the  view  which  has  just  been  presented  to  you,  contains  a 
pledge  of  our  discipleship — a  public  avowal  of  Christ  as  our 
great  Master  and  Teacher — an  explicit  profession  of  our 
faith  in  the  doctrines  taught  by  his  Spirit  in  those  holy  ora- 
cles committed  to  the  custody  of  his  church  for  its  illumina- 
tion and  sanctification. 


*  The  same  rite  of  initiation  into  their  sciiools,  and  with  the  same  meaning,  waj 
frequently  used  by  the  philosophers  of  Greece,  as  well  as  of. many  eastern  nations, 
from  whom  the  Greeks  borrowed  it. 

f  This  fact  serves  to  explain  a  passage  in  the  Acts  of  the  Apostles.  Paul  meet- 
ing with  certain  disciples  in  Asia  who  were  very  imperfectly  instructed  in  the  prin- 
ciples of  the  gospel,  demanded  of  them  unto  what  they  had  been  bapiiscd  ?  that  is, 
to  what  system  of  doctrines;'  They  answered,  unto  John'' 3  baptism.  The}t  were 
disciples  of  John,  and  had  embraced  only  the  doctrine  of  repentance  wl.iph  he 
had  taught.  This  custom  explains  the  meaning  of  St.  Paul  -when  he  t/ianlcs  God 
that  he  had  baptised  none  of  them  but  Cri.pus  and  Ciaius,  lest  any  should  say  he 
had  bapti'sid  in  his  onn  nam*",  the;eby  putting  himself  at  the  head  of  a  new  sect; 


464: 

Although  a  man,  at  the  age  of  reason,  may  justly  make 
this  profession  for  himself,  it  may  be  asked,  perhaps,  if  a  oa- 
rent  can  rightfully  make  it  in  the  name  of  his  infant,  so  that 
when  that  infant  shall  have  arrived  at  maturity,  it  shall  be  le- 
gally considered  as  his  act  ?  Whatever  dififerences  of  opin- 
ion may  exist  with  regard  to  this  question,  according  to  the 
various  lights  in  which  the  subject  of  it  may  be  viewed,  all 
Trill  agree  in  the  following  principle,  that  it  is  both  the  right, 
and  the  duty  of  a  parent  to  place  his  beloved  offspring  un- 
der the  best  means  to  enlighten  and  cultivate  their  minds,  to 
form  their  hearts,  to  regulate  their  lives,  and  to  prepare 
them,  if  possible,  for  the  highest  happiness,  both  in  this 
world,  and  the  world  to  come ;  in  one  word,  to  initiate  them 
In  the  school  of  Christ.*  This  school  is  the  church  :  these 
means  of  education  are  the  ordinances,  the  instructions,  the 
discipline,  the  watchful  care,  and  prayers  of  the  church. 
And  it  is  one,  and  not  the  least  of  the  spiritual  blessings  re- 
sulting from  baptism  in  infancy,  that,  thereby,  parents,  in 
addition  to  the  tender  constraints  of  natural  duty,  impose  up- 
on themselves  the  most  solemn  voluntary  obligations  to  train 


*  Ujjon  this  Eubject,  one  would  think  that  there  could  not  exist  any  diversity 
of  opinion.  It  seems  to  be  a  manifest  principle  of  justice,  that  a  parent  has  a 
right  to  enter  into  contract,  or  to  make  any  engagement  in  the  name  of  his  child, 
for  his  benefit,  which  it  is  the  privilege  of  his  child,  when  he  arrives  at  mature 
age,  to  accept ;  although  he  is  at  liberty  also,  to  his  own  detriment,  to  reject ; 
and  which,  if  it  involves  his  duty,  as  well  as  his  interest,  as  in  the  present  case, 
he  ig  under  sacred  obligations  to  fulfil.  Such  engagement  is  not  imposing  on  our 
nosterlty  a  hnrdtn,  but  gainiog  for  them  a  htwfit. 


455 

Up  their  children  in  the  nurture  and  admonHion  of  llir 
Lord  ;  and  that  cliililien  enjoy  sflll  further  advantages  by 
being^  placed  under  the  immediate  and  special  care  of  that  ho 
ly  community  to  whom  are  committed  the  oracles  of  God. 

2.  But  there  is  another  and  more  interesting  h"ght  in  which 
this  ordinance  is  to  be  viewed.  It  is  the  seal  by  which  God 
has  condescended  visibly  to  confirm  to  the  church  the  bles- 
sings of  the  New  Covenant  which  he  has  graciously  estab- 
lished in  Christ  for  the  redemption  of  the  world.  This  was 
the  import  of  the  correspondent  rite  of  the  church  of  Israel. 
God  gave  to  Abraham  circumcision  a  seal  of  the  righteous-' 
ness  which  is  by  faith. "^  And  this  is  one  of  the  principal 
denominations  by  which  baptism  has  been  designated  io  the 
christian  church  from  the  earliest  ages.  But  here  it  is  ne- 
cessary to  remark  and  correct  an  error  upon  this  subject 
which  has  unhappily  disturbed  the  ideas  of  many  good  and 
excellent  men.     Baptism  has  been  regarded  by  them  as  the 

*  A  seal  of  the  righteousness  of  the  faith  nhich  he  had,  being  zincircumcised. 
This  expression  cannot  reasonably  be  supposed  to  mean,  as  has  been  asserted  by 
?orae  writers,  merely  a  declaration  of  the  sincerity  of  Abraham's  faith  j  for  this 
seal  was  administered  to  the  cfTspring  of  Abraham  at  an  age  in  which  no  such  de- 
claration could  be  expected  from  them.  Besides  the  apostle,  in  the  place  is 
ppeaking  of  circumcision,  not  merely  as  a  sign  given  to  Abraham  in  particular, 
but  as  an  ordinance  of  the  church.  In  this  general  view  it  was  desi{;ned  as  a  seal 
of  the  righteousness  of  faith ;  that  is,  of  that  gracious  covenant  wbicli  lias  substi- 
tuted the  righteousncs"  nhich  comes  by  faith  in  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  in  the  room 
of  the  perfect  and  personal  obedience  required  by  the  first  covenant,  and  which 
has  DOW  become  impracticable  to  the  frailty  and  corniplion  of  honnan  watnrf.  Vie 
iBg  possible  only  through  a  Mediator,  and  Surety. 


456 

seal  of  the  believing  parent  given,  botli  in  his  own  name,  and 
in  that  of  his  child,  as  its  natural  proxj,  testifying  his  entire 
acquiescence  in  the  tonditions  of  the  covenant ;  and,  by  the 
same  act,  laying  the  child  under  an  obligation  of  acquiescing 
in  them,  and  fulfilling  them,  as  soon  as  it  shall  attain  the  age 
of  reason.  And  undoubtedly,  the  act  of  the  parent,  in  of- 
fering his  child  to  receive  the  seal  of  baptism  is,  on  his  part, 
a  formal  acknowledgment  of  the  covenant  and  profession  of 
faith  in- its  gracious  promises.  It  has,  likewise,  been  admit- 
ted, and  has  been  before  asserted,  that  a  parent  possesses 
from  nature,  and  fr^m  religion,  a  right  to  enter  into  any  right- 
eous covenant  in  the  name  of  his  child,  when  the  objects  of 
that  covenant  are  only  blessings,  and  privileges  ;  and  espe- 
cially when  its  conditlens  or  terms  are  antecedent  duties. 

Baptism,  however,  in  the  just  and  scriptural  view  of  it.  Is 
chiefly  to  be  considered  as  the  outward  and  visible  seal  which 
God  has  been  pleased  to  annex  to  his  own  promise  ;  a  pro- 
mise which  he  has  graciously  given  to  the  church  under 
the  form  of  a  covenant  engagement ;  by  this  seal  ratifying, 
and  confirming  to'  her,  and  to  all  who  are  taken  into  her  care, 
the  propositions  of  his  grace  and  mercy,  through  Jesus 
Christ.  Abraham  did  not  give  to  God  the  seal  of  circumcis- 
ion as  a  pledge  of  his  duty  and  obedience  ;  but  the  scrip- 
ture  declares,  he  received  it  from  God  for  himself  and  his 
offspring,  in  order  to  confirm  that  gracious  covenant,  or  pro- 


457 

mise  which  he  had  made  to  the  father  of  the  faithful ;   I  iviU 
be  a  God  to  yon,  and  your  seed  after  you.^ 

Do  you  ask  if  it  is  not  doing  dishonour  to  the  faithfulness  of 
Jehovah  to  suppose  that  his  promise  requires  to  be  confirmed 
by  symbols  and  sacraments,  by  oaths  and  seals  ?  Is  not  his 
word  alone  the  firm,  and  immutable  foundation  of  every  believ-^ 
er's  trust  and  hope  ?  It  is  true  the  veracity  of  God  needs  no 
support  from  outward  forms  ;  and  it  is  not  for  his  sake,  but  for 
ours,  that  he  is  sonietimes  pleased  to  employ  them,  in  order  to 
give  the  deeper  impression  to  divine  truth  upon  the  heart. 
Frail  as  we  are,  and  receiving  all  our  impressions  through  the 
medium  of  the  senses,  ideas,  merely  intellectual,  arc  neither 


*  If  we  refer  to  the  whole  strain  of  the  kietoiy,  in  the  17  th  chapter  of  Genesis 
which  records  the  transactions  of  God  with  Abraham,  Ihia  interpretation  will  be 
confirmed.  It  was  a  covenant  entirely  of  Xh^'^ratuitom  kind,  on  the  part  of  God, 
engaging  b7*an  expresiion  of  the  most  comprehensive  meaoinj — [I  will  be  a  God  to 
yoii,  ^c]  to  bestow  the  mo»t  ainple  spiiitual  blessings  on  his  chosen  servant,  and 
on  his  posterity.  In  every  covenant  of  this  nature  the  forms  of  ratification  are 
used  by  him  only,  and  are  intended  to  oblige  only  him  who  bestows  the  favour. 
The  beneficiary  simply  receives  the  prumiie,  or  charter  which,  when  confirmed  by 
the  requisite  legal  forms,  and  ratified  hy  the  seal  of  the  benefactor,  becomes  his 
title  of  inheritance,  or  possession,  on  the  performance  of  whatever  condition  it 
c6ntaiu3. 

It  was  not  an  unusual  thing  for  Almighty  God  thus  to  confirm  his  promises  and 
•covenants  to  patriarchs,  and  holy  meo,  by  some  external  sign,  or  token.  His  pro- 
mise to  Noah  he  confirmed  by  his  bow  in  the  clouds.  To  Gideon  he  gave  a  sign, 
or  seal  of  his  commission  to  be  the  deliverer  of  Israel,  by  consuming  his  sacrifice 
upon  the  rock.  To  .ibraham  he  gave  the  sign  of  Circumcision.  And,  on  another 
occasion,  he  caused  a  burning  lamp  to  pass  between  the  parts  of  his  sacrifice.  To 
Hczekiah  the  sign  of  the  shadow  reiurniug  back  upon  the  dial  was  added  to  the 
promise  of  his  recovery.  And  to  the  hou>t,  of  David,  and  of  Israel,  he  give  by 
fhe  prophet  Isaiah,  this  onviiterioui  sign,  u,  virgin  shall  conniviand  btar  a  S9n. 

58 


4d8 

so  clearly  conceived,  nor  take  such  Grrn  possession  of  the  soul'; 
as  when  they  are  embodied,  if  I  may  speak  so,  and  conveyed 
to  us  under  sensible  images.  It  is  not,  therefore,  unworthy 
of  the  glory  and  wisdom  of  God  ;  ort  the  other  hand,  it  is  a 
proof  of  his  infinite  benignity  and  condescension,  to  confirm 
to  us  the  everlasting  truth  of  his  word,  by  such  impressive 
and  external  symbols  as  will  unite  the  influence  of  sense  with 
(hat  of  intellect  and  faith,  in  giving  the  doctrine  of  his  grace 
their  full  effect  upon  the  mind.  Hence  God  has  been  pleas- 
ed to  exhibit  the  promises  of  his  mercy  to  mankind  through 
Jesus  Christ,  under  the  gracious  title  of  a  covenant ;  and,  a& 
ter  the  manner  of  such  conventions  among  men  ;  and  in  or- 
der more  perfectly  to  adapt  himself  to  that  susceptibility  of 
sensible  impressions  which  belongs  to  our  nature,  he  has 
condescended  to  confirm  his  truth  in  that  transaction  by  pub- 
licly and  visibly  annexing  to  it  his  own  seal.  Let  me  illus- 
trate this  idea  by  an  analogy  borrowed  from  civil  transactions. 
As  charters  conveying  special  privileges  to  corporations,  or 
to  individuals  are  scaled,  and  authenticated  by  public  offi- 
cers duly  appointed  and  commissioned  for  that  purpose  by 
the  sovereign  power ;  in  like  manner,  is  this  precious  char- 
ter of  our  spiritual  and  immortal  privileges,  confirmed  to  us 
by  the  seal  of  the  Great  Head  of  the  church  affixed  to  it,  m 
the  name  of  God,  by  ministers  solemnly  set  apart  for  this 
end  according  to  the  order  which  he  has  established  in  his 
spiritual  kingdom  ;  so  that  whatever  is  rightfully  performed 
by  them  may  be  justly  said  to  be  done  by  him.    Baptism,* 


459 

Ibereforc,  is  the  seal  of  God  applied  to  his  own  covenant, 
thereby  con6rraing  to  those,  to  whom  it  is  administered,  ihe 
propositions  of  his  mercy  through  Jesus  Christ,  and  visibly 
testifying  that  they  are  taken  from  under  the  curse  of  the  ori- 
ginal and  broken  covenant,  which  admitted  only  of  perfect 
ohediencey  and  condemned  the  transgressor  to  eternal  death, 
and  placed  under  the  new  dispensation  of  grace,  which  con- 
fers forgiveness  on  repentance,  and  salvation  on  tiie  obedi- 
ence of  faith. 

As  every  public  seal  contains  emblems  expressive  of  the 
nature,  and  security  of  the  blessings  it  confers,  we  see  in  like 
manner,  this  christian  seal  distinguished  by  emblems,  the 
most  simple,  indeed,  but  the  most  impressive  and  august. 
We  see  in  it  the  symbol  of  that  precious  blood  which  was 
shed  for  our  redemption,  and  of  the  Holy  Spirit  by  whose 
gracious  influences  the  principles  of  a  divine  life  are  infused 
into  the  soul,  and  cherished  to  perfection ;  and,  finally,  the 
symbol  of  that  heavenly  purity  which  should  adorn  and  dis- 
tinguish the  disciples  of  Jesus  Christ. 

Thus  have  I  presented  to  you  this  ordinance  in  its  double 
signification  :  as  the  rite  by  which  we  are  initiated  into  the 
school  of  Christ ;  and  as  the  seal  by  which  God  continually 
repeats  and  confirms  the  gracious  propositions  and  promises 
of  his  covenant  to  the  seed  of  the  church. 


460 

2.  1  shall,  in  the  next  place,  proceed  to  point  out  the  pro 
per  subjects  of  this  ordinance.  For  on  the  right  of  our 
chil  iren  to  receive  the  seal  of  the  covenant  depends,  in  my 
view,  its  principal  benefits.  This  right,  then,  is  demonstrat- 
ed from  analogy  ;  from  scripture  example  ;  and  from  thn 
whole  stream  of  the  history  of  the  primitive  church. 

1.  From  analogy,  in  the  first  place.-— If  the  father  of  the 
faithful  received  from  God  the  seal  of  the  righteousness  which 
is  by  faith  ;  that  is,  of  the  covenant  of  grace,  in  which  that 
faith  which  unites  us  to  Christ,  making  us  partakers  of  his 
merits,  and  acting  as  the  principle  of  a  holy  life,  is*" accepted 
instead  of  the  perfect  righteousness  of  the  law  ;  and  if  he  was 
permitted,  as  a  precious  privilege,  to  impress  it  on  all  his 
oflfspring ;  does  not  this  right  belong,  with  still  stronger  rea- 
son to  believing  parents,  under  the  dispensation  of  the  gos- 
pel ?  For  the  coming  of  the  Messiah,  far  from  having  abridg- 
ed, has  greatly  extended  ihe  privileges  of  the  faithful. 

2.  Let  us  hear  in  the  next  place,  the  clear  and  strong  lan- 
guage of  the  apostle  Paul.  "  The  promise,"  saith  he,  "  was 
not  to  Abraham  or  his  seed  through  the  law,  but  through  the 
righteousness  of  faith.  And  it  is  of  faith  that  it  might  be  by 
grace ;"  that  is,  of  free  favour,  and  not  purchased  by  any 
meritorious  works  of  man,  "  to  (he  end,  that  the  promise 
might  be  sure  to  all  \\\e  seed,  not  to  that  only  which  is  of  the 
law,"  or  his  natural  ppsterily,  composing  the  Jewish  church. 


461 

but  to  that  also  which  Is  of  the  faith  of  Abraham,— i?o>n.  iv. 
13 — 16  :  meaning  the  believing  Gcntilea  who  should  be  called 
to  a  participation  of  his  privileges.  What,  then,  is  ih^it pro- 
mise made  sure,  by  the  seal  of  the  covenant,  to  all  the  seed, 
both  under  the  law,  and  under  the  gospel  ?  If  we  look  bacii 
to  the  institution  of  this  covenant  with  Abraham,  and  of  the 
holy  seal  by  which  it  was  confirmed,  we  there  find  the  pro- 
mise ;  /  7vitl  be  a  God  to  thee  and  to  thy  seed  after  thee.  This 
is  what  was  emphatically  called  the  promise  by  the  ancient 
Jewish  writers  ;  and  was,  as  I  have  formerly  shewn,  another 
denomination  for  the  covenant  of  grace.  Under  the  same 
denomination  it  is  frequently  referred  to  in  the  writings  of  the 
apostles.  And  whenever  this  holy  transaction  is  mentioned 
by  the  sacred  writers,  under  this  form,  it  is  manifest  that  they 
intend  the  peculiar  promise  of  the  gospel,  which  is  salvation 
by  Christ  through  the  righteousness  of  faith,  comprehending 
all  that  is  implied  in  the  covenant  of  grace.  Of  this  no  other 
proof  need  be  adduced  than  its  being  so  often  put  by  thetn  in 
contrast  with  the  law.*     To  receive  the  seal  of  this  promise 


*  See  particularly  the  Ep.  to  Gal.  ch.  iii.  v.  IG,  17,  18,— 21— 29.— 18,  If  tlic 
Inheritance  be  by  works  of  the  law,  it  i:^  no  more  of  promise.  2J,  Is  thf  law, 
then  against  the  promise  of  God.  24—29,  The  law  is  our  schoolmaster  to  bring  u« 
to  Christ.  If  we  he  CkrisPs,  then  are  we  Jbraham^s  seed,  and  heirs  according  to 
the  promise.  16,  17,  Now  to  Abraham  and  hia  seed  were  the  promises  made. 
And  this  I  say  that  the  co\-enant,  plainly  implying  the  covenant  contained  in  the 
promises,  which  was  conGrmed  before  of  God  in  Christ,  the  law  whicli  was  four 
h.undred  and  thirty  yearg  after,  cannot  di.'^anmil,  that  it  should  make  the  promise 
of  none  effect.  The  promise  here  is  evidently  equivalent  to  the  covenant  made 
with  Abraham:  and  what  could  that  covenant  hfr  which  rWMCon/injied  e/'Gwfjn 
Chr'^f,  but  the  covenant  of  grace  P 


4a2 

was  the  precious  privilege  of  the  seed  oF  Abraham  ;  it  uras 
the  privilege  of  his  children's  children  to  the  remotest  genera- 
tions. And  on  the  same  ground,  pursuing  the  apostle's  rea- 
soning, it  is  the  privilege  of  the  children  of  his  faith, /or  thei) 
who  are  of  faith  are  the  children  of  Abraham.  If  ye  be 
Christ^ Sy  then  are  ye  Abraham^ s  seed,  and  heirs  according 
to  the  fromise;  the  promise  given  to  Abraham  at  the  institu- 
tion of  the  covenant — I  will  he  a  God  to  thee,  and  to  thy  seed 
after  thee.  To  confirm  this  conchision,  no  language  can  oe 
stronger  or  more  unequivocal  than  that  of  the  apostle  Peter 
addressed  to  the  vast  assembly  at  Jerusalem  touched  by  his 
powerful  discourse.  "  Repent,  and  be  baptized  every  one  of 
you  in  the  name  of  Jesus  Christ,  for  the  remission  of  sins, 
and  ye  shall  receive  the  gift  of  the  Holy  Ghost.  For  the 
promise  is  to  you,  and  to  your  children,  and  to  all  who  are 
afar  offj  even  as  many  as  the  Lord  our  God  shall  call."  As 
soon  as  he  enjoins  it  upon  them  to  be  baptized,  he  reminds 
them  of  an  ulterior  duty,  to  have  this  holy  rite  administered 
io  their  children,  and  their  household  after  the  example  of 
Abraham :  quoting  to  them  that  covenanted  promise  with 
which  every  Israelite  was  so  well  acquainted,  and  to  which 
every  believer,  as  well  as  the  patriarch  Abraham,  is  entitled  ; 
— the  promise  of   forgiveness,    and  acceptance  with  God 


It  deserves  here  to  be  remarked,  that  the  very  language  which  is  used,  the  cov^- 
7iGnt  confirmed  of  God,  corroborates,  and  places  almost  beyond  doubt,  the  princi- 
ple, that  circumcision,  under  the  ancient  dispensation,  and  baptism  under  the 
new,  is  the  seal  of  God  by  which  it  was  confirmed,  and  was  added  to  strenglhen 
our  faith,  and  to  give  it  deeper  impression  on  the  heart  of  the  believeV. 


468 

through  the  righteousness  of  faith.  He  adds,  and  not  to  yoil 
only  and  to  your  children,  who  are  naturally  descendants  of 
Abraham,  but  to  the  Gentiles  also,  who  are  frequently  desig- 
nated in  holy  scripture  by  those  who  are  afar  off.  Called 
by  Christ  into  the  church,  which  was  so  long  confined  to  the 
posterity  of  Israel,  they  are  now  equally  with  Jews,  entitled 
to  all  its  blessings,  and  its  privileges,  and  among  others,  to 
this  precious  seal  of  the  covenant  for  themselves,  and  their 
oflfspring. 

It  is  in  vain  to  allege,  as  has  been  done  by  certain  writers, 
that  the  promise  here  refers  to  the  prediction  of  the  prophet 
Joel,  who  foretold  that  in  the  last  days  God  tvoidd  pour  out 
his  Spirit  upon  all  flesh.  For  what  connexion  has  this  proph- 
ecy with  the  command  to  be  baptised  ?  The  apostle  is  answer- 
ing the  anxious  inquiry  of  his  hearers,  who  were  pricked  in 
their  heart ;  men  and  brethren)  what  shall  we  do/*  And  in 
his  answer,  directs  them  to  the  proper  source  of  peace,  and 
consolation  ;  repent  and  be  bapti::ed,  and  you  shall  receive 
the  Holy  Ghost  in  his  sanctifying  power,  and  his  comforting 
influence  :  for  the  promise,  through  Christ  whom  I  preach,  is, 
according  to  the  tenor  of  the  covenant  with  your  father  Abra- 
ham, to  you  and  to  your  children  ;  and  not  to  you  only,  but  to 
the  Gentiles,  also,  to  those  who  are  afar  off,  who,  by  faith  shall 
become  children  of  Abraham,  and  heirs  of  his  blessings. 

Such  is  the  clear  and  obvious  conclusion  resulting  from  the 
apostle's  words,      The  same  consequence  arises,  with  no 


464 

less  certainty,  from  the  advice  addressed  by  St.  Pani  td 
a  believing  husband  or  wife,  not  to  separate  from  the  unbe- 
lieving wife  or  husband  with  whom  they  may  be  respective- 
ly connected.  For,  saith  he,  the  unbeliever  is  sanctified  by 
the  believer,  else  were  your  children  unclean,  but  now  are 
they  holy.  What  is  the  proper  import  of  this  term! 
Throughout  the  sacred  scriptures,  it  is  applied  only  to  such 
persons  or  things  as  are  peculiarly  set  apart,  and  consecrat- 
ed to  God.  In  the  connexion  in  which  it  stands  in  this  pas- 
sage, it  can  imply  nothing  less  than  that  children  are  quuiifi- 
ed,  by  the  profession  of  faith,  or  the  church  membership  of 
one  of  their  parents,  to  be  solemnly  set  apart  from  the  world, 
and  devoted  to  God — a  rite  which  can  visibly  take  place  only 
in  the  ordinance  of  baptism.^ 

If  the  right  of  infants  to  the  ordinance  of  baptism  evident- 
ly results,  as,  by  the  preceding  illustrations,  it  appears  to 
do,  from  the  analogy  of  the  christian  with  the  Abrahamic, 
seal  of  the  covenant,  it  is  still  farther  confirmed  by  the  prac- 
tice of  the  apostles.     The  passage  to  which  reference  has 

*  It  is  a  prostitution  of  language,  in  this  place  to  confound,  as  has  been  done  by 
one  sect  of  christians,  holiness  with  legitimacy  of  birth.  The  whole  train  of  the 
apostle's  observations,  and  reasoning,  translated  according  to  this  meaning  of  the 
term,  would  be  absurd  or  ridiculous. — For  the  unbelieving  mft  is  sancHJied,  that 
is,  made  a  legitimate  subject  of  marriage,  by  the  believing  husbund,  and  the  im- 
beliering  husband  is  sanctijiedt  that  is,  made  a  legitimate  subject  of  marriage,  by 
Ike  believing  nnfe,  therefore,  their  marriage  was  lawful;  else  were  your  children 
illegitimate,  but  now  are  they  lawlully  begotten.  Besides  other  absurdities,  this 
would  be  proving  the  lawfulness  of  the  marriage  by  the  legitimacy  of  the  children  j 
t'.nd  again  the  legitimacy  of  the  children  by  the  lawfulness  of  the  marriage. 


465 

just  been  made,  affords  no  slight  attestation  to  the  practice  of 
St.  Paul.  In  addition  to  this,  when  Lydia  declared  her  faith 
in  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  the  i5ame  apostle,  along  with  her, 
hapthed  her  household.  With  Jarius  also,  he  baptized  alt 
who  were  in  his  house*  It  has  been  objected  to  the  evi- 
dence which  he  would  derive  from  these  facts,  that  those 
who  are  referred  to,  by  the  sacred  historian,  in  the  house  of 
Jarius,  and  the  hotisehold  of  Lydia,  were  only  the  adults 
of  the  respective  families,  who  were  themselves  believers. 
What  will  not  the  prepossessions  of  party,  or  the  pride  of 
theory  maintain  and  defend  ?  For  this  pretence  certainly, 
the  history  affords  no  ground.  It  assigns  no  other  reason  for 
baptizing  these  families  than  simply  the  faith  of  Lydia  ancl 
of  jarius.* 

3.  I  add  that,  if  any  apostolic  usage  can  derive  confirma- 
tion from  the  uniform  practice,  and  tradition  of  the  church, 
to  modern,  and  very  recent  times,  it  is  that  of  infant  baptism. 
It  is  attested  by  Justin  Martyr,  who  lived  only  forty  years 

*  This  was  perfectly  conformable  to  the  example  of  the  Jewish  church  in  recci\-- 
ing  proselytes  either  by  circumcision,  or  by  baptism,  from  the  Gentile  nations. 
The  pagan  convert  who  professed  his  faith  in  the  great  legislator  of  Israel,  and 
the  promises  made  to  the  fathers,  at  once  incorporated  his  whole  family  along  with 
himself,  into  the  body  cf  that  cliosen  people. 

It  ia  eaid,  indeed,  by  the  writers  who  differ  from  us  Ui)0n  this  subject,  that,  ii> 
the  history  of  the  New  Testament,  baptism  is  never  administered  except  to  a  per- 
sonal profession  of  faith.  But,  let  it  be  remembered  that  this  history  records  on- 
ly examples  of  proselytes  from  unbelieving  nations.  In  a  similar  case,  a  pei-sonal 
pnolession  of  faith fvould  be  required  by  the  warmest  friends  of  infant  baptism. 
In  the  few  instances  in  which  families  have  been  mentioned,  wp  n^.e  tbatth'^v  a^ 
■"aj-s  follow  the  faith  rf  the  hcnd. 


aftcF  the  age  of  the  apostles.  And  the  evidences  of  (he 
fact  are  conveyed  down  in  a  continued,  and  unsuspected 
stream  of  history,  to  the  time  of  St.  Augustine,  and  Pela- 
gius,  who,  though  antagonists  in  the  controversies  which 
were  raised  in  that  age,  on  some  of  the  most  important  doc- 
trines of  religion,  and  both  of  them  among  the  greatest  scho- 
lars, and  most  eloquent  writers  of  the  period  in  which  they 
lived,  declare,  "  that  they  had  never  heard,  that  they  had 
never  read  of  any,  even  the  most  heretical  churches,  who 
denied  the  baptism  of  infants."^ 

*  But  few  of  the  writers  of  the  earliest  age  of  the  church  have  escaped  the  rari- 
ges  of  lime,  anrl  rome  rlown  to  us  entirp  And  no  controversy  existing  at  that  pe- 
riod, on  the  subject  of  baptism,  few  occasions  occur  of  directly  introducing  any 
precise  opinions  concerning  it,  or  of  explicitly  stating  the  practice  of  the  apostles, 
and  their  immediate  successors.  But  wherever  this  ordinance  is  mentioned,  ei- 
ther more  or  less  directly,  the  testimony  of  the  primitive  writers  is  uniformly  io 
favour  of  tlie  baptism  of  infants.  In  the  second,  and  especially  in  the  third  and 
following  centuries,  circumstances  having  more  frequently  called  for  explicit  opin- 
ions on  questions  relative  to  this  subject,  the  practice  of  the  primitive  church  be- 
comes, from  this  time  more  and  more  evident.  Justin  Martyr,  and  Irenaeus,  who 
lived  from  forty  to  sixty  seven  years  after  the  apostles,  both  speak  of  those  "  who 
were  made  disciples,  and  regenerated  to  God  in  infancy,"  a  figurative  mode  of  ex- 
pression familiar  in  that  age,  to  signify  baptism  the  symbol  of  discipleship  and 
regeneration      Just.  Mar.  apol.  11.  Iren,  adv.  haeres.  lib.  3  chap.  39. 

In  the  second  century  some  doubts  having  arisen  in  the  church  concerning  ori- 
ginal sin,  and  the  nature  and  degree  of  guilt  which  adheres  to  infants,  we  find  in 
the  discussions  which  arose  on  these  subjects,  more  frequent  mention  made  of  the 
baptism  of  infants  than  in  the  former  period.  The  illustrious  Origan,  who  flour- 
ished in  the  very  beginning  of  the  second  century  after  the  apostles,  maintaining 
tlie  original  corruption  of  human  nature,  derives  one  of  his  principal  arguments- 
from  the  universal  practice  of  the  church,  of  administering  baptism  to  the  young- 
est children;—"  If  infants,  says  he,  are  not  liable  to  original  sin,  why  are  they 
then  baptised*"'  Homil.  8.  in  lev.  chap.  12. 

St.  Gyprian  bishop  of  Carthage,  who  wrote  about  one  hundred  and  fifty  years 
after  the  apostolic  age,  establishes  the  general  usage  of  infailt  baptism  by  a  qioat 
convincing  fact.  He  informs  us  that  a  council  of  sixty  six  bishops  being  assembled 
at  Carthage,  a  doubt  was  proposed  by  one  of  them,  whose  name  was  Fidus,  whs- 


4:67 

Having  established  the  right  of  christian  parents  to  have 
their  otfspring  placed  under  the  guardianship  and  care  of  the 
church,  in  the  ordinance  of  baptism,  let  ur  examine,  in  the 
next  place,  what  privileges  and  blessings  are  conferred  by 
this  act. 

Whether  we  consider  baptism  ag  the  rite  by  which  our 
children  are  initiated  into  the  church  as  the  school  of  Christ, 
er  as  the  seal  which  God  has  been  pleased  to  annex  to  his 
covenant,  in  order  to  ratify,  and  more  effectually,  to  con- 
firm to  our  faith  the  promises  of  his  grace,  its  privileges  and 
blessings,  rightly  understood,  are  manifold  and  great.  For 
t<5  Abraham  and  his  seed,  to  the  church,  and  the  seed  of  the 
church,  are  committed  the  oracles  of  God,  with  all  their 
lights,  their  comforts,  their  precious  promises,  their  immor- 
tal hopes.     In  order  to  give,  at  once,  force  and  illustration  io 


ther  baptism  ought  to  be  administered  to  infants  before  the  eighth  day  after  their 
birth  ;  doubting  whether  or  not  the  custom  of  the  Jews  in  tliis  respect  ought  to  be 
followed.  The  council  unanimously  decreed  that  baptism  ought  not  to  be  post- 
poned till  the  eighth  day.  After  stating  the  grounds  of  their  decree,  they  con- 
clude in  these  words; — 'MVherefore  dearly  beloved,  it  is  our  opinion,  that 
from  baptism  and  the  grace  of  God  who  is  benignant  to  all,  none  ought  to  be  pnv 
hibited  by  us ;  and,  as  this  is  to  be  observed  with  regard  to  all,  so  especially  is  it 
to  be  observed  with  respect  to  infants  who  are  just  born,  and  deserve  our  help, 
and  the  divine  mercy." — Cyp.  ep.  ad.  FiJum,  chap.  C3. 

Let  me  subjoin  the  very  pertinent  remark  of  a  judicious  writer  ;  *'  Origcn  was 
born  about  eighty  tive  years  after  the  apostolic  age.  His  father  and  grandfather 
were  both  christians,  and  as  there  can  be  no  doubt  of  his  being  baptized  in  infan- 
cy, from  the  manner  in  which  he  speaks  of  infant  baptism,  this  fact  verifies  the 
practice  of  the  apostles  ;  and  so  carries  up  (he  universal  usage  of  the  cliurcli  to 
vithin  a  very  few  years  of  those  blessed  companion?  of  our  liOrd." 


468 

ihis  reflection,  let  us  imagine  our  children  born  where  the  dis- 
pensation of  grace  is  not  known,  and  to  have  been  iefl  under 
the  darkness  of  paganism,  to  the  feeble  glimmerings  of  na- 
ture, to  lead  them  to  a  knowledge  of  their  Creator,  their 
Redeemer,  and  their  duty  ;  imagine  them,  under  all  the  ca- 
lamities of  life,  to  have  been  forsaken  of  the  comforts  of  re- 
ligious hope ;  and,  after  their  most  anxious  endeavours  to 
look  into  futurity,  and  to  appease  the  forebodings  of  con- 
science, unable  to  penetrate  beyond  this  dark  sphere,  or  to 
discern  any  certain  means  of  access  to  the  holy  and  right- 
eous Judge  of  the  universe,  and,  at  length,  abandoned  to 
the  cruel  despair  which,  without  the  light  of  revelation,  rests 
upon  the  shadows  of  the>  grave  ;  imagine  all  this,  and  then 
judge  of  the  inestimable  value  of  that  blessed  sacrament 
which,  agreeably  to  the  command  of  Christ,  places  us,  from 
the  beginning  of  life,  in  the  bosom  of  the  church,  where  a 
divine  illumination  continually  shines  ;  where  life  and  immor- 
tality are  brought  to  light ;  where  the  veil  which  covers  the- 
eternal  world  is  drawn  aside ;  where  the  way  of  peace  is 
clearly  revealed  to  sinful  and  perishing  men ;  where  the  care 
of  parents,  and  the  fidelity  of  the  ministers  of  religion  are 
engaged  under  the  most  solemn  obligations,  for  the  discipline, 
and  instruction  of  the  infant  mind  ;  where  the  influences  of 
the  Holy  Spirit  are  promised  to  assist  the  effect  of  these  in- 
structions ;  and  where  all  the  means  and  aids  are  enjoyed 
which  it  has  seemed  good  to  infinite  wisdom  to  afford  to  man- 
kind, for  the  attainment  of  their  everlastina;  salvation. 


469 

Such  are  the  blessings  connected  with  baptism,  consider- 
ed merely  as  an  initialing  symbol  introducing  us  into  the 
church  of  Christ.  We  are  placed  by  it  under  the  happiest, 
and  most  elTectual  cultivation  for  Heaven.  * 

Let  us  now  contemplate  this  symbol  in  another  light,  as 
the  seal  which  God  has  annexed  to  his  covenant  for  the  so- 
lemn confirmation  of  his  promises,  and  we  shall  discover  in 
(his  view  of  it,  a  new  treasure  of  spiritual  blessings. 

Every  child  of  Adam,  by  his  error,  and  fall,  and  by  the 
rigorous  tenor  of  the  violated  covenant,  has  become  an  heir 
of  death.  But  God,  in  his  infinite  mercy,  at  the  moment  of 
transgression,  placed  the  frailty  of  man  under  a  dispensation 
of  grace  in  Jesus  Christ.  Of  this  most  benignant  and  mer- 
ciful dispensation,  which  obviates,  or  remedies,  the  evils  of 
the  broken  law,  circumcision  anciently,  and  now  baptism,  is 
the  gracious  assurance  and  seal.  In  the  symbol  of  baptism, 
therefore,  you  behold  the  visible  pledge,  and  annunciation, 
on  the  part  of  God,  that  the  baptized  infant  is  taken  from  un- 
der the  impracticable  conditions,  and  the  curse  of  the  first 
covenant,  and  placed  under  the  grace  of  the  second,*  Yon 
behold  that  precious  infant,  on  its  first  entrance  into  exist- 


*  It  is  not  intended  by  this  to  pay,  that  the  act  of  baptism  transfers  us  from  the 
one  covenant  to  the  other.  That  was  done  by  the  promise  of  the  Suvmir  imme- 
diately after  the  Fall.  But  it  is  the  solemn  authentication  of  this  truth  on  the 
part  of  God,  and  the  declaratory  seal  of  this  grace. 


4ro 

ence,  met  with  the  covenant  of  peace,  and  the  promises  of 
eternal  life  sealed  in  the  blood  of  the  Redeemer. 

Is  baptism,  then,  a  certain  title  to  eternal  life  ?  I  say  not 
that ;  but  it  is  a  solemn  and  authentic  proposition  of  the 
covenant  of  grace,  with  all  its  privileges,  blessings,  and  con- 
ditions under  the  seal  of  God.  It  is,  therefore,  a  visible  and 
sacramental  confirmation  of  the  provisional  title  of  the  bap* 
tized  to  life  and  immortality  on  the  terms  of  the  gospel ; 
that  is,  on  sincere  repentance,  and  a  true  faith  in  our  Lord 
Jesus  Christ.  Let  me  illustrate  this  principle  by  a  familiar 
example.  By  charter  from  the  government  of  your  country, 
or  bequest  from  a  dying  parent,  you  may  become  entitled  to 
ample  privileges,  or  rich  possessions,  on  the  performance  of 
certain  conditions.  The  seal  annexed  to  that  charter,  or 
that  testament,  by  the  proper  authority,  is  the  declaration  of 
the  will  of  your  parent,  or  your  country,  and  consequently, 
the  formal  authentication,  and  security  of  your  title  the  mo- 
ment the  condition  shall  be  fulfilled.  This  condition  is,  to 
all  who  have  grown  to  such  mature  age  as  to  be  capable  of 
actual  sin,  not  perfect  obedience,  according  to  the  tenor  of 
the  first,  and  broken  covenant,  but  according  to  the  constitu- 
tion of  the  covenant  of  grace,  repentance  towards  God,  and 
faith  towards  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  which,  however,  leads 
to  perfection,  and  plants  in  the  heart  the  seeds  of  holiness, 
and  of  eternal  life.  But  to  every  infant  dying  in  infancy,  it 
is  an  unconditional  assurance,  of  a  glorious  inheritance  in  the 


471 

kingdom  of  heaven.  The  infant  being  placed  under  the 
grace  of  the  second  covenant,  is  delivered  from  the  curse  of 
the  firsl,  so  far,  that,  being  united  by  a  new  and  blessed  rela- 
tion to  the  Secocd  Adam,  its  original  taint  and  impurity,  de- 
rived  from  its  relation  to  the  first,  is  covered  by  the  blood  of 
the  atonement.  It  is,  therefore,  through  the  mercy  of  Gpd 
in  Christ,  made  an  heir  of  eternal  life.  Of  these  precious 
truths  baptism  is  the  sacramental  pledge,  and  seal  of  assurance 
given  by  God.  What  a  consolation  does  this  view  present 
to  the  christian  parent,  who  weeps  over  the  dear  remains  of 
the  infant  snatched  untimely  from  his  embrace  !  What  a 
comfortable  and  extended  prospect  does  it  exhibit  of  the 
grace  of  the  gospel.^ 

Having  offered  to  your  consideration,  in  a  few  plain  and 
obvious  principles,  the  right  of  infants  born  within  the  church, 
to  the  seal  of  the  covenant,  and  pointed  out  the  blessings  of 
which  they  become  partakers  by  it ;  I  will  next  endeavour 
to  designate,  more  particularly,  the  limits  of  the  visible 
church,  and  exhibit  the  nature  and  extent  of  that  profession 
of  the  name  of  Christ  which  entitles  a  parent  to  offer,  and  the 


*  Ver>'  far  would  I  be  from  insiauatiug  that  tUose  who  die  without  bap- 
tism do,  therefore,  fail  of  salvation.  But  between  the  baptized  and  unbaptized 
infant  dying  in  infancy,  there  is  this  difference— that,  to  the  one,  the  inherit- 
ance  of  eternal  life  is  conveyed  by  covenant  from  God,  under  his  appointed 
seal ;  ^he  other  is  left  to  the  free,  indeed,  but  anauthenticated  pledge  of  his  mer- 
cv  in  this  ordinance. 


4?2 

cbur  ch  to  receive  hi*  infant  offspring  to  a  participation  o! 
this  holy  ordinance. 

The  principal  question  which  has  been  raised  upon  Ihi? 
subject,  turns  on  this  single  point,  whether  the  church  on 
earth,  consists  only  of  those  who  are  truly  regenerated,  and 
hare  added  sincere  and  new  obedience  to  their  open  profes- 
sion of  the  name  of  their  Redeemer ;  or,  on  the  other  hand, 
embraces  ail  those  who  have  been  baptized,  and  continuing 
to  profess  the  doctrines  of  the  Saviour,  submit  themselves  to 
the  counsels,  admonitions,  reproofs,  and  to  the  whole  disci- 
pline of  that  spiritual  body  whose  head  is  Christ. 

The  constitution  of  the  Jewish  church,  the  type  and  coun- 
terpart of  the  Christian,  will  assist  us  to  determine  this  ques- 
lion.  All  who  believed  in  Moses,  the  great  prophet  of  God, 
and  submitted  to  his  law,  were  embraced  in  the  external 
bonds,  and  received  tlie  distinguishing  seal  of  the  covenant.. 
But,  thzy  were  not  all  Israel,  who  were  of  Israel.  A  dis- 
tinction existed  among  them,  which, must  always  exist  upon 
earth,  among  the  professing  disciples  of  Christ,  between  the 
visible,  and  the  invisible  church.  The  latter  is  composed  of 
those  only,  who,  by  sincere  piety,  and  an  entire  renovation 
of  heart,  bear  the  inward  image  of  their  Lord  and  Master. 
The  former  embraces  all  who  are  united  together  under  the 
profession  of  the  same  system  of  doctrines,  who  enjoy  the 
?ame  ordinances,  and  who  submit  to  the  same  discipline  for 


473 

regulating  the  exterior  order  and  manners  of  its  members* 
To  the  church  of  Israel,  comprehending  the  entire  iiution, 
were  the  oracles  of  God  committed.     And  the  seal  of  that 
gracious  covenant,   which   was  contained,  and  explained  in 
these  oracles,   and  exhibited  \o  the  ancient  church  under  a 
thousand  typical  rites,  was  impressed  on  all  their  offspring, 
and  on  all  who  were  born  in  their  houses,  and  trained  up  ia 
the  knowledge  of  divine  truth  under  their  care.      Analogy, 
then,  will  lead  us  to  extend  the  application  of  the  christian 
seal  to  the  households^  and  especially,  to  the  children  of  all 
who  are  members  of  the  visible  church  ;  that  is,  who  have 
been  baptised  themselves,  who  acknowledge  the  Lord  Jesus 
Christ  as  their  Lord  and  Saviour,  who  profess  to  embrace 
the  huly  scriptures  as  containing  the  only  certain  rule  of  du- 
ty, and  the  only  foundation  of  their  immortal  hopes,  who 
submit  themselves  and  their  households  to  the  discipline  and 
instruction  of  the  church,  and  who  promise  to  concur  with 
her  in  the  pious  education  and  government  of  all  those  whom 
nature  hath  given  to  their  affection,  or  providence  subjected 
to  their  authority. 

To  the  invisible  church  baptism  cannot  be  confined,  be- 
cause men  have  no  certain  rule  by  which  to  discriminate  it 
from  the  mass  of  visible  professors.  Let  me  ask  those  who 
suppose  that  somewhat  more  is  necessary  in  the  recipient  to 
the  validity  of  this  ordinance  than  regular  morals,  an  open 
profession  of  the  faith,  and  submission  to  the  discipline  of  the 


474 

church,  Is  it  because  they  esteem  the  actual  sanctification 
of  the  parent  essential  to  the  rightful  administration  of  bap- 
tism to  the  child  ?  Who,  then,  can  know,  with  certainty, 
that  he  is  baptized  ?  Do  they  say  that  it  is,  at  least,  neces- 
sary, that  in  the  judgment  of  charity,  a  parent  should  be  a 
sincere  believer  ?  Where  is  the  scripture  rule  which  rests 
the  benefit  of  baptism  on  our  judgment  of  the  internal  state  of 
a  man's  heart?  or  makes  it  the  standard  by  which  we  are  to 
admit  his  infant  to  the  external  privileges  of  the  covenant  of 
grace  ?  Will  not  those  judgments  of  charity  vary  in  different 
churches  ?  Will  tbey  not  vary,  perhaps,  in  diflferent  pastors 
in  the  same  Church  ?  Too  earnestly  he  cannot  be  admon- 
ished, indeed,  that  vital  and  universal  holiness  of  heart  and 
life  is  essential  to  salvation,  and  essential,  likewise,  to  the 
faithful  and  acceptable  discharge  of  this,  and  of  every  duty 
in  the  sight  of  God  ;  yet  it  cannot  be  essential  to  the  validi- 
ty of  this  ordinance,  and  its  spiritual  benefit  to  his  infant 
oJSspring. 

Let  us  recur  again  to  the  proper  meaning  and  design  of 
this  ordinance,  and  this  conclusion  will  not  fail  to  strike  us 
with  additional  force.  It  is,  in  the  first  place,  the  rite  of  our 
initiation  into  the  school  of  Christ,  in  which  we  receive  those 
lessons  of  divine  wisdom,  which  cannot  be  taught  to  man  by 
the  wisdom  of  the  world  ;  and  in  which  we  enjoy  the  happi- 
est means  of  promoting  our  virtue  and  holiness,  and  the  most 
eflfectual  aids  for  the  attainment  of  our  salvation. 


475 

it  is,  in  the  next  place,  the  seal  which  God  hath  annexed 
to  the  external  dispensation  of  his  covenant,  in  order  that  he 
might,  by  a  rite,  so  solemn,  though  so  simple,  confirm  the 
propositions  of  his  mercy  to  fallen  man,  through  the  atone- 
ment and  mediation  of  the  ever  blessed  Redeemer.  ThC 
church  openly  annexes  this  seal  to  the  covenant,  in  the  name 
and  by  the  authority  of  God  himself.  The  church  takes  the 
infant  under  her  protection  and  instruction.  Most  desirable 
it  is  to  have  the  co-operation  and  assistance  of  the  parents 
in  this  sacred  and  important  duty  :  and  they  they  are  bound, 
by  every  obligation,  of  nature  and  religion  to  afford  it.  But 
it  is  still  more  the  duty  of  the  church  to  enlighten  and  direct 
the  infant's  opening  reason,  to  imbue  it  with  holy  and  heav- 
enly principles,  to  illustrate,  to  inculcate,  to  press  upon  it  the 
precious  privileges,  the  gracious  promises,  the  glorious  hopes 
of  which  she  has  given  it  the  seal.  The  church  when  she 
is  faithful  to  her  trust,  adopts  every  infant,  whom  she  re- 
ceives by  baptism,  within  the  pale  of  her  privileges.  It  is 
her  faith,  her  fidelity  which  is  to  be  regarded  in  this  ordi- 
nance even  more  than  that  of  the  parent. 

It  is  with  the  view  chiefly  to  the  pious  education  of  the 
seed  of  the  church  that  this  ordinance  is  administered  to  in- 
fants. /  know  him,  saith  God  of  the  father  of  the  faithful, 
at  the  institution  of  this  rite,  that  he  will  train  tip  his  chiU 
dreUy  and  his  household  after  him,  to  keep  the  way  of  the 
Lord,      In  the  primitive  ages,  when  many  parents  were  in- 


476 

Capable  themselves  of  fulfilling  these  holy  duties,  benevolent 
and  pious  sponsors  offered  themselves  to  discharge  theifl 
in  their VooDi.  But  the  church  was  considered  as  sponsor  for 
all  her  children,  and  she  is,  certainly,  the  best,  and  most 
faithful  sponsor,  when  she  considers  her  duty  aright,  for  eve- 
ry infant  whom  she  receives  to  her  protection  and  care  by 
this  ordinance.  On  this  ground  it  was  that  she  required  ex- 
posed children,  and  children  of  whatever  parents,  with  the 
care  of  whose  pious  education  she  charged  herself,  to  re- 
ceive, under  her  direction,  the  holy  rite  of  baptism. 

ON  THE  FORM  OF  BAPTISM. 

If  the  mode  of  administering  this  ordinance  had  been  es- 
sential to  its  validity  we  slionld  justly  have  expected  to  see 
it  prescribed  with  as  much  particularity  as  any  of  the  Leviti- 
cal  ceremonies.  On  the  other  hand,  there  is  no  de6nite 
prescription  on  this  subject,  farther  than  that  water  is  to  be 
applied  as  a  symbol  of  that  regeneration  and  purification  of 
our  nature  which  all  men  need,  and  which  a  sincere  faith  in 
the  gospel  is  intended,  and  fitted  to  produce.  Any  applica- 
tion, therefore,  of  this  cleansing  element,  which  is  a  natural 
emblem  of  spiritual  purity,  especially,  if  it  be  justified  by  the 
usage  of  the  church,  and  the  import  of  the  terms  employed 
by  the  sacred  writers,  is  iis  proper  and  legitimate  form.  In 
warm  climates  where  daily  bathing  is  the  customary  mode  of 
cleansing  the  person^  immersion  may  be  used  with  the  high- 


477 

est  propriety  ;  in  other  regions,  where  it  is  seldom  necessary 
for  this  purpose,  to  wash  dailj^  more  than  a  part  of  the  body, 
a  partial  appHcation  of  water  may  be  made  with  equal  rea- 
son.    An  action  of  our  Saviour  recorded  in  the  thirteenth 
chapter  of  (he  gospel  of  John,  is  full  of  instruction  on  this 
subject.     It  was  usual  with  (he  Jews,  before  eating,  to  wash 
their  feet,  a  practice  which  had  become  necessary,  both 
from  the  fashion  of  their  dress,  and  their  manner  of  reclin- 
ing upon  couches  at  their  meals.     Christ,  in  order  to  give 
his  disciples  a  lesson,  at  once,  of  humillly,  and  purity,  con- 
descended himself  to  wash  their  (eet     When  Peter  under- 
stood the  meaning  of  (his  action,  and  that  it  was  intended 
as  a   symbol  of  his  purification,  and  acceptance   with  his 
Lord,  he  exclaimed  in  the  fervour  of  his   zeal,  Lord  !  not 
my  fed  only,  but  also  my  handSi  and  my  head.     But,  as 
the  action  of  the  Saviour  was  merely  symbolical,  cleansing 
that  part  of  the  body  which  it  was  customary  to  wash  at  that 
time,  was  sufficient  to  answer  the  design  ;  therefore,  he  re- 
pUes  to  Peter,  he  that  is  washed,  needeth  not  save  to  wash 
his  feet y  but  it  is  every  whit  clean. 

Having  made  these  preliminary  remarks,  I  observe  that 
the  terra  baptism,  in  the  sacred  writings,  is  applied  indiffer- 
ently, to  signify  either  partial,  or  entire  washing — either 
sprinkling,  or  immersion,  according  to  the  situation  of  the 
agent,  or  the  object  of  the  action.  It  is  unnecessary  to  cite 
all  the  passages  in  which  this  is  demonstrated.     To  one  or 


4r8 

two  only  I  shall  refer.  When  Jesus  went  to  eat  with  a  cer* 
tain  pharisee,  Ihe  pharisee  wondered  that  he  had  not  first 
washed  ;  referring  to  the  Jewish  custom  of  washing  their 
hands  before  meat.  In  the  original  it  is,  he  wondered  that 
he  had  not  first  baptised.  Many  other  things  there  be, 
saifh  the  evangelist  Mark,  which  they  have  received  to  hold, 
as  the  washing  (in  the  original,  the  baptism)  of  cups,  of 
pots,  of  brazen  vesselsy  and  of  tables.  As  the  sacred  wri- 
ter is  probably  referring  to  the  instruments  of  the  temple  ser- 
vice, or  to  those  domestic  utensils  which  were  religiously 
purine d,  according  to  the  same  forms,  the  whole  Levitical 
ritual  proves  that  these  purifications  were  effected  by  va- 
rious sprinklings,  or  aspersions.  As  the  term  baptism,  and 
all  those  derived  from  the  same  root  are  employed  to  signify 
sprinkling,  and  partial  washing,  no  less  than  immersion,  so  it 
is  well  known  that  the  primitive  church  used  indifferently, 
and  according  to  present  convenience,  the  one,  or  the  oiher 
of  these  forms,  in  administering  the  baptismal  rite  ;  particu- 
larly in  the  case  of  clinici,  or  the  sick,  and  those  of  great 
delicacy  of  constitution,  or  of  health.  And  in  forming  our 
judgment  of  the  validity  of  the  mode  by  aspersion,  it  de- 
serves to  be  particularly  remarked,  that  sprinkling  is,  through- 
out the  sacred  writings,  used  as  one  of  the  most  common 
and  significant  emblems  of  purity,  of  cleansing,  of  repent- 
ance, of  every  thing  that  is  implied  in  the  waters  of  baptism. 
Not  to  speak  of  the  innumerable  aspersions  used,  for  this 


4T9 

purpose,  under  the  Levitical  law,  the  blood  of  Ihe  atonement 
is  expreh."ily  called  the  blood  of  sprinkling.  Isaiah,  in  an- 
nouncing the  oflice,  and  grace  of  l>lessiah,  declares  he  shall 
sprinkle  many  nations.  The  prophet  Ezekiel,  in  proclaim- 
ing the  sanctifying  influence  of  the  gospel,  does  it  by  this 
figure ;  Then  will  I  sprinkle  clean  water  upon  you,  and. 
you  shall  be  clean.  And  when  the  apostle  would  express, 
in  the  strongest  terms,  (hat  purity  of  mind  which,  in  our  ap- 
proaches to  God,  we  ought  to  bring  with  us  to  the  throne 
of  grace,  he  says  ;  Let  us  come  to  him,  having  our  hearts 
sprinkled  from  an  evil  cojiscience. — But  I  forbear  to  multi- 
ply proofs.  These  are  sufficient  to  demonstrate  that  either 
mode,  by  immersion,  or  by  sprinkling,  will  answer  the  whole 
intention  of  the  ordinance,  as  an  emblem  of  that  purity  of 
life  which  becomes  a  disciple  of  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ. 

The  principal  evidence  on  which  the  advocates  for  immer- 
sion, as  essential  to  the  rightful  administration  of  this  ordi- 
nance, rest  their  opinion,  is  an  expression  used  by  the  apos- 
tle m  his  epistle  to  the  Romans,  and  in  that  to  the  Collos- 
sians ;  buried  with  him  by  baptism.  Whether  this  allu- 
sion be  made  to  the  practice  of  immersion,  borrowed  from 
the  custom  of  bathing  in  warm  clitnates,  or  not,  it  establish- 
es no  exclusive  form  for  this  ordinance.  It  is  an  expression 
highly  figurative  ;  and  no  argument  can  be  safely  rested  on 
a  figure  of  speech.     It  affords,  at  the  ntmost,  only  a  collat- 


480 

era!,  and  indirect  support  to  other  argumenfs,  by  its  suppos- 
ed reference  to  an  existing  custom.  But,  admitting  that  re- 
ference to  be  real,  in  the  present  case  ;  and  the  inference  es- 
tablishing the  existence  of  the  custom  to  be  ever  so  justly 
drawn,  still  it  could  not  impose  immersion  on  the  church  as 
the  indispensable,  and  exclusive  form  of  baptism.  For,  if 
the  custom  were  to  create  a  rule  which  could  not  be  depart- 
ed from,  that  custom  should  be  entirely  and  completely  ad- 
hered to.  But  I  presume  baptism  with  the  person  naked, 
which  was  the  practice,  where  plunging  was  used  in  those 
warm  climates,  in  imitation  of  bathing,  would  not  now  be  de- 
sired, or  tolerated  by  any  christian  sect.  The  habits, 
modes,  and  customary  ideas  of  that  age,  took  away  that  sense 
of  impropriety  which  would  justly  shock  the  delicacy  of  our 
modern  sentiments.  Even  on  the  ground,  then,  of  this  figure 
containing  a  reference  to  an  existing  custom,  that  custom 
would  not  infallibly  bind  men  in  every  age,  and  in  every 
climate  or  state  of  society. 

But,  let  us  carry  on  this  argument  from  figure  into  the 
following  verses,  and  see  how  it  will  operate ;  For,  saith  the 
apostle,  "  if  we  have  been  planted  in  the  likeness  of  his  death, 
we  shall  be  also  in  the  likeness  of  his  resurrection  ;  knowing 
this  (hat  our  old  man  is  crucified  with  him."  Here  then  are 
three  figurative  expressions,  all  referring  to  the  same  object, 
the  ordinance  of  baptism,  and  its  symbolic  signification  of  a 
death  unto  sin ;  viz.  "  buried  with  him  by  baptism  unto  death; 


481 

planted  in  the  likeness  of  his  deadi ;  and  crucifying  with  him 
our  old  man."  According  (o  this  reasoning,  therefoic,  bap- 
tisra  shouhl  contain  something  in  the  mode  of  its  administra- 
tion corresponding  to  all  these  figures  :  so  that,  if  the  first 
figure  necessarily  implies  the  justification  of  the  mode  of 
baptizing  exclusively  by  immersion  :  the  last  will,  on  the 
same  ground,  justify,  and  require  the  form  of  the  church  of 
Rome  in  baptizing  with  the  sign  of  the  cross.  But  as  the 
friends  of  immersion  do  not  admit  of  the  latter  consequence, 
those  who  conform  to  the  practice  of  baptizing  by  sprink- 
ling, with  equal  reason,  do  not  think  themselves  bound  by 
the  former. 

Upon  the  whole  view  of  this  subject,  I  conclude,  and,  I 
think,  from  the  fairest  reasoning,  that  the  mode  of  adminis- 
tering baptism,  whether  by  sprinkling,  or  immersion,  is  not 
essential  to  the  validity  of  the  ordinance,  which  requires  only 
that  the  emblem  of  its  cleansmg  and  purifying  virtue  be  sig- 
nificantly preserved- 


61 


OF   THE 

EXTERNAL  SEALS 

OF   THE 

COVENANT  OF  GRACE. 


The  second  seal  attached  to  the  covenant  of  grace,  or  the 
second  sacrament  of  the  New  Testament,  is  the  Lord's  sup- 
per. This  ordinance  was  instituted  by  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ, 
immediately  before  his  final  sufferings,  in  which  he  appoint- 
ed bread  and  wine  to  be  used  as  memorials  of  his  death  for 
the  sins  of  the  world,  and  symbols  of  the  union  of  his  people  to 
him,  and  to  one  another.  The  apostle  Paul,  in  his  first 
epistle  to  the  Corinthians,  ch.  ii.  v.  23 — 26 :  has  stated 
the  origin  of  this  festival,  and  the  manner  in  which  it  was 
celebrated  by  our  Lord  himself,  with  his  disciples,  as  an  ex- 
ample for  the  imitation  of  his  church  in  all  ages.  Corres- 
ponding with  this  exhibition,  is  the  account  recorded  by  the 
evangelists  Matthew  and  Luke.  And,  from  the  whole,  it  is 
evident,  that  the  broken  bread  was  employed  as  an  emblem 
of  the  body  of  the  Saviour  broken  in  the  room  of  sinners, 
and  the  wine  in  like  manner,  was  used  as  an  emblein  of  his 


484 

blood  shed  lor  the  remission  of  sins.  These  simple,  but 
lively  images  were  ordained  to  call  up  to  the  memory  of  the 
believer,  the  death  and  sufiferings  of  his  Redeemer,  with 
greater  vivacity  and  force  than  can  be  done  by  the  preach- 
ing of  the  gospel  in  our  ordinary  assemblies. — Do  this,  said 
our  Lord,  while  he  broke  the  bread,  and  distributed  the  cup, 
in  remembrance  of  me.  But  the  ordinance,  as  I  have  said, 
Las  another  and  secondary  object,  which  is  to  represent  the 
union  of  believers  with  their  great  Head  by  faith  and  love, 
and  among  themselves,  by  the  spirit  of  charity.  "  The  cup 
of  blessing  which  we  bless,"  saith  the  apostle,  "  is  it  not 
the  communion  of  the  blood  of  Christ  ?  and  the  bread 
which  we  break,  is  it  no'  the  communion  of  the  body  of 
Christ  ?  For,  we,  being  many,  are  one  bread,  and  one  bo- 
dy ;  for  we  are  all  partakers  of  that  one  bread." 

The  different  ends  which  a  christian  may  have  in  view  in 
this  ordinance,  have  been  marked  in  the  various  denomina- 
tions which  it  has  received  in  the  primitive  church,  the  chief 
of  which  are  continued  down  to  the  present  age.  The 
hordes  supper)  and  the  table  of  the  Lord^  are  denomina- 
tions nearly  equivalent ;  the  one  taken  from  the  time  in  which 
it  was  celebrated  ;  the  other  taken  from  the  manner  in  which 
It  was  eaten,  wherein  it  resembled  an  ordinary  meal.  It  has 
been  a  practice  in  all  countries  to  commemorate  great,  and 
interesting  events,  and  to  testify  mutual  joy,  and  a&ectlon 
r>n  such  occasions,  by  feasting  together.      These  denomina- 


485 

tions,  therefore,  imply,  Ihat  this  ordinance  is  to  be  viewed  as 
a  ieslival  of  coramemoralion,  in  which  (he  faithful  meet  at 
the  same  table,  to  testify  their  common  interest  in  the  great 
sacrifice  of  the  cross,  and  their  common  faith,  and  hope,  in 
the  redemption  which  is  in  Christ  Jesus  their  Lord. 

In  reference  to  these  objects,  chiefly,  it  is,  that  these  de* 
votional  acts  have  been  styled  the  communion,  the  eucha- 
rist,  or  the  cup  of  blessings  not  only  from  the  act  of  thanks- 
giving by  which  it  is  consecrated,  or  blessed  for  the  use  of 
the  communicant,  but  from  the  praise  and  gratitude  which 
should  fill  the  heart  of  the  humble  believer  in  this  holy  ser- 
vice, and  which  is  usually  expressed  with  ardour  by  the 
voice,  while  occupied  in  celebrating  this  memorial  of  (he  in- 
finite goodness  and  m6rcy  of  Almighty  God,  through  our 
Lord  Jesus  Christ.  It  is  denominated,  likewise,  by  the 
apostle,  the  breaking  of  bread;  and,  to  mention  no  more, 
out  of  the  many  titles  which  it  afterwards  received  in  the 
church,  it  is,  in  the  holy  scriptures,  called  our  passover ;  be- 
cause it  was,  under  the  new  economy,  evidently  instituted  in 
the  room  of  that  ancient  sacrament  under  the  antecedent  dis- 
pensation. There  existed  indeed,  an  obvious  analogy  between 
the  two  ordinances.  The  paschal  lamb  was  a  type  of  Ch/iat, 
That  victim  was  oflfered  in  commemoration  of  the  great  deliv- 
erance of  Israel  from  the  bondage  of  Egypt,  which  had  a  typi- 
cal allusion  to  the  infinitely  greater  salvation  of  the  cross,  in 
which  were  consummated  all  the  types  of  the  altar.     The 


4H6 

principal  difference  between  these  ordinances,  wliicli  serves^ 
however,  to  illustrate  their  analogy,  is,  that  the  one  was  the 
memorial  of  a  temporal,  the  other  of  an  eternal  salvation— 
the  one  consisted  of  a  bloody  victim  which  prefigured  the 
great  sacrifice  of  the  gospel ;  the  other  is  the  bloodless  me- 
morial of  the  last  of  victims,  which  hath  finished  our  salva- 
tion and  accomplished  an  everlasting  righteousness. — The 
ceremonies  of  the  one,  were  also  borrowed  from  those  of  the 
other.  For,  the  victim  apart,  which  can  no  longer  be  offer- 
ed under  the  gospel,  the  bread  was  used  in  imitation  of  the 
unleavened  bread  of  the  passover,  which  the  Jews  ate,  af- 
ter being  blessed  or  consecrated  by  prayer  and  thanksgiving. 
The  cup,  likewise,  formed  a  considerable  part  of  the  paschal 
festival,  which  they  always  blessed,  before  receiving  it,  by 
a  form  of  prayer,  and  action  of  thanks  ;  and  the  last  cup, 
which  concluded  the  whole  service,  was  succeeded  by  an 
hymn  ;  which  hymn,  their  learned  men  inform  us,  consisted 
of  the  following  psalms,  113 — 118;  and  is  supposed,  by 
many  writers,  to  have  been  the  same  which  Christ,  with  his 
disciples,  sung  at  the  conclusion  of  his  last  supper. 

OF  THE  CEREMONIES    WITH  WHICH  THE  ADMINISTRATIOIJ 
OF  THIS  ORDINANCE  OUGHT  TO  BE  ACCOMPANIED. 

As  the  dispensation  of  the  gospel  entirely  rejects  the  cum- 
brous ritual  of  the  law,  and  rejoices  only  in  the  simplicity  and 
purity  of  its  spirit,  the  administration  ef  thia  ordinance,  al- 


48r 

though  the  most  solemn  which  is  known,  under  the  new  co* 
venanf,  ought  to  be  accompanied  only  with  those  simple  cct- 
emonies  recorded  by  the  evangelists  in  its  original  institution, 
and  recited  by  St.  Paul  in  its  repetition.  They  consist 
merely  in  prayer  and  thanksgiving,  by  an  administrator  pro- 
perly authorized  to  consecrate  the  elements,  and  separate 
them  from  an  ordinary  to  a  sacred  use — in  the  breaking  of 
the  bread,  and  distribution  of  the  cup,  in  the  presence  of 
the  communicants — in  a  declaration  of  the  nature  and  design 
of  the  ordinance,  by  the  officiating  priest,  and  of  the  proper 
qualifications  of  those  who  may  be  admitted  to  partake  of  its 
grace — in  receiving  it  in  both  kinds  in  the  usual  posture  of 
feasting  which  obtains  in  each  country — and,  finally,  conclud- 
ing the  whole  with  some  proper  form  of  thanksgiving,  and 
some  devout  hymn  of  praise.  Our  Saviour  employed  un- 
leavened bread  in  this  holy  office,  because  no  other  was  eat- 
en at  Jerusalem  in  the  season  of  the  passover  ; — his  posture 
was,  reclining  on  a  couch,  which,  in  that  age,  was  the  only 
one  in  use  at  public  feasts,  and  generally,  also  at  private 
meals.  But,  as  there  is  no  precept  enjoining  the  use  of  un- 
leavened bread,  as  in  the  Jewish  festival,  christians  may  use 
their  liberty  as  to  the  kind  ;  though  the  church  of  Rome^ 
which  is  negligent  of  other  parts  of  the  divine  example,  is 
scrupulous  in  using  bread,  or  wafers  without  leaven.  The 
same  church,  as  well  as  some  of  the  protestant  communion, 
receive  this  sacrament  in  the  posture  of  adoration,  instead  of 
the  ordinary  attitude  of  feasting,  which  was  used  by  out 


48a 

Lord,  and  his  disciples.  But  in  determining  what  ceremo- 
nies ought  to  be  employed  in  conformity  with  the  great  ex- 
ample which  is  to  direct  our  conduct,  and  what  punctilios 
may  be  varied  or  dispensed  with,  it  is  necessary  to  bear  in 
mind  the  end  of  the  institution,  and  the  circumstances  attend- 
ing the  time  of  its  original  celebration.  Its  double  end,  as 
we  have  seen,  was  to  be  a  memorial  of  the  death  of  our 
Lord,  and  a  sj^mbol  of  the  union  of  his  people  ;  both  which 
were  attained  by  the  institution  of  a  solemn  festival.  It  is 
conformable  to  reason,  therefore,  that  the  posture  of  feasting, 
as  it  prevails  in  each  country,  ought  to  be  preserved  in  this 
religious  act.  But  the  species  of  bread,  used  in  this  ordi- 
nance, or  the  time  of  the  day  devoted  to  it,  at  its  original 
administration,  being  intimately  connected  with  the  customs 
of  the  Jewish  passover,  do  not  impose  upon  the  christian 
church  any  obligation  of  conformity  in  these  respects. 

The  posture  of  adoration,  and  the  denial  of  the  cup  to  the 
laity,  having  sprung,  in  the  church  of  Rome,  from  supersti- 
tious views  of  the  ordinance,  and  false  ideas  of  the  miracu- 
lous conversion  of  the  bread  and  wine  into  the  real  body  and 
blood  of  Christ,  ought  to  be  rejected  along  with  the  supersti- 
tious service. 

The  ceremonies  accompanying  this  christian  rite,  appear 
to  have  been  copied,  in  general,  from  those  which  obtamed 
in  the  Jewish  passover.     Among  that  people,  the  adminis- 


4a9 

Orator  alw^ays  blessed  the  elements,  or  pronounced  a  prayer 
of  benediction  and  thanksgiving  over  them,  and  especially 
over  the  cup,  distributing  it  afterwards  to  all  who  were  pre- 
sent at  the  table.  In  r'eference  to  this  act  of  de  vol  ion  the 
psalmist  exclaims,  Iivlll  take  the  cup  of  salvation j  and  will 
call  upon  the  name  of  the  Lord.  And,  in  the  christian 
church  the  cup  was  given  to  the  laity,  as  well  as  to  the  cler- 
gy, till,  a  short  time  after  the  commencement  of  the  thirteenth 
century,  a  different  custom  began  to  prevail  among  the  La- 
tins. And,  finally,  in  the  council  of  Constance,  in  the  year 
1414,  the  laity  were  entirely  prohibited  from  receiving  the 
cup,  as  if  it  actually  contained  the  blood  of  (he  Son  of  God. 
"  It  would  be  impious,"  said  those  blind  and  superstitions 
priests,  "if  any  of  the  divine  and  heavenly  drops  should, 
by  any  accident  among  the  communicants,  be  spilled  upon 
the  ground."  For  the  same  reason,  those  ignorant  men  or- 
dered the  bread  to  be  formed  into  a  wafer,  and  put  into  the 
mouth  of  each  communicant,  least  any  crumb  should  be 
lost,  and  that  each  might  receive  the  whole  hosty  as  it  was 
called,  a  superstitious  term  derived  froai  the  Latin,  and  signi- 
fying the  sacrifice,  or  victim.  The  original  custom,  howev- 
er, still  prevailed  throughout  all  (he  East,  among  the  Greeks, 
the  Russians,  the  Armenians,  the  Abyssinians,  the  Copts^ 
and  even  the  Nestorians,  and  Jacobins  ;  and  has  been  re- 
ceived in  all  the  reformed  churche3. 


490 

Pure  wine,  wherever  it  can  be  obtained,  ought  to  be  em- 
ployed not  only  because  it  is  the  best  emblem  of  that  pre- 
cious blood  which  gives  life  and  strength  to  those  who  use  it, 
but  because  it  is  strictly  conformable  to  the  example  of  the 
Saviour  in  its  original  institution.  Where  wine  cannot  be 
obtained,  or  where  it  remarkably  disagrees  with  the  stomachy 
reason  dictates  that  it  must,  or  that  it  ought  to  be  omitted. 
But  they  are  to  be  blamed  who,  like  the  hydroparastatae, 
substitute  water,  or  any  other  liquor  in  the  room  of  wine. 
The  custom  of  substituting  weaker  liquors,  void  of  spirit  in 
the  room  of  wine,  which  was  practised  by  certain  small  sects, 
was,  probably,  introduced  originally,  by  some  weak,  but  pi- 
ous men,  as  a  preventative  against  intoxication,  too  many  in- 
stances of  which,  as  we  learn  from  the  apostle,  had  taken 
place,  to  the  great  reproach  of  their  holy  profession,  in  con- 
sequence of  too  liberal  a  use  of  that  strong  liquor.  For,  in 
that  age,  they  literally  feasted  upon  bread  and  wine,  a  diet 
to  which  they  had  been  accustomed  from  its  plenty,  and  did 
not  use  it  in  that  sparing  manner  which  has  since  been  prac- 
tised in  our  christian  assemblies— 1  Cor,  xi.  21. 

A  declaration  of  the  nature,  and  design  of  the  ordinance, 
and  of  the  requisite  qualifications  of  those  who  may  be  ad- 
mitted, by  the  officers  of  the  church  to  receive  it,  along  with 
the  faithful,  is  evidently  a  custom  of  great  propriety,  in  or- 
der to  recal  to  mind,  more  forcibly,  the  import  and  solemni- 
ty of  that  sacred  transaclion,  and  to  assist  the  ignorant  in  ex- 


491 

amining  themselves  ;  a  serious  duly  which  is  incumbent  up- 
on all  before  they  adventure  to  cat  of  that  bread,  anddrini: 
of  that  ctq) — 1  Cor  xi.  28.  * 

The  only  circumstance  farther,  which  it  is  of  importance 
to  remark  in  the  administration  of  this  ordinance,  is,  that,  in 
all  ordinary  cases,  it  ought  to  be  performed  only  by  a  per- 
son properly  qualified,  and  ordained  to  the  pastoral  office 
by  the  government  of  the  church.  It  was,  in  the  first  in- 
stance, dispensed  by  our  Lord  himself.  Afterwards  it  fell 
to  be  administered  by  the  apostles,  and  those  whom  the}' 
had  set  apart  to  preach  the  word,  and  dispense  the  sacra- 
ments. And,  generally,  it  is  requisite,  for  the  sake  of  or- 
der, and  common  utility,  that  this  holy  office  should  be  con- 
fined to  those,  who  are  the  regular  successors  of  the  apos- 
tles, and  ordained  according  to  that  form  which  the  gospel 
has  prescribed,  or  the  church  esteems  best  calculated  for 
preserving  purity  of  doctrine,  and  of  manners. — Yet,  where 
any  society  of  christians  is,  from  the  nature  of  their  circum- 
stances, deprived  of  those  aids,  perhaps  they  ought  to  as- 
semble for  the  worship  of  God,  and  may,  without  violence 
to  the  institutions  of  Christ,  appoint  men  of  prudence  and 
piety,  from  among  themselves,  to  lead  in  their  devotions, 
and  to  preside  in  these  sacred  festivals  of  love.  This  is  a 
liberty,  however,  which  ought  always  to  be  used  with  the 
most  profound  caution,  and  only  after  the  most  serious  cor. 
^iction  of  its  absolute  necessity. 


491 


OP  THE  USE  OF  CEREMONIES,  OR  EXTERNAL  SYMBOLS. 

Since  the  gospel  is  a  dispensation,  and  requires  a  worship 
of  the  most  pure  and  spiritual  kind,  it  may  well  be  made  a 
question,  why  any  material  elements,  or  symbols  like  these 
should  be  employed  in  its  religious  services  ?  And  1  would 
answer,  that  it  appears  to  arise  simply  from  a  gracious  con- 
descension in  Almighty  God,  and  accommodation  to  the  im- 
perfection of  our  nature.  While  we  remain  in  the  body,  we 
are  necessarily  and  strongly  affected  by  certain  striking  and 
sensible  signs,  on  serious  and  interesting  occasions.  The 
bloody  robe  of  Cfesar  displayed  to  the  populace  of  Rome 
was  more  eloquent  than  all  the  harangues  of  the  assertors  of 
her  liberty.  On  this  principle  of  our  nature,  statues,  and 
altars  have  been  erected,  and  festivals  instituted  to  the  me- 
mory of  great  men  by  the  gratitude  of  nationS;  or  employed 
Id  the  celebration  of  illustrious  events.  On  the  same  princi- 
ple, we  love  ta  wear  some  relic,  or  to  adopt  some  symbol 
of  mourning,  io  recal  the  idea  of  our  departed  friends.  On 
the  two  gceatest  occasioDSj  herefore,  in  our  christian  course, 
our  initiation  into  the  church  of  Christ,  and  giving  our  pub- 
lic and  explicit  assent  to  our  christian  covenant,  if  appears  to 
he  wise  and  good  to  require  these  solemn  and  interesting  acts 
tp  be  ronfirmed  by  upt,  and  significant  symbols  which  are 
calculated  deeply  to  impress  the  inind  by  affecting  the  sen- 
ses.    On  the  other  hand,  it  is  equally  good  and  wise  in  him^, 


493 

Hot  to  have  loaded  bis  worship  with  an  unmeaning  multitude 
of  ceremonies.  For,  it  is  not  more  certain,  that,  on  all  just, 
and  great  occasions,  sensible  emblems  properly  cliosen,  have 
a  powerful  and  useful  eflfect,  than  that  too  great  a  multiplica- 
tion of  ceremonies,  strongly  inclines  (he  mind  to  a  frivolous 
superstition,  substituting  rites,  and  external  forms  in  the 
room  of  true  devotion  and  holiness  of  life. 

OF  TRANSUBSTANTIATION. 

In  different  parts  of  the  church,  some  errors  have  been  in- 
troduced into  this  holy  rite,  but  since  the  light  which  has  so 
abundantly  been  shed  upon  it  by  the  protestant  writers,  they 
are  no  longer  in  danger  of  producing  any  pernicious  effect, 
and  the  palpable  absurdity  of  Transubstantiation,  in  partic- 
ular, hardly  requires  a  serious  refutation. — By  this  term^ 
which,  for  a  long  time,  misled,  with  almost  magical  effect, 
the  church  of  Rome,  was  intended,  the  transmutation  sup- 
posed to  pass  on  the  elements  of  bread  and  wine,  into  the 
reaj  body  and  blood  of  Christ :  an  opinion,  most  evidently, 
contrary  to  reason,  and  common  sense;  and  which  has  no 
support  in  the  language  of  scripture,  or  the  usages  of  the 
primitive  ages.  This  doctrine  contradicts  the  evidence  of 
all  our  senses,  by  wtich  alone  we  can  form  an  accurate  judg- 
ment on  the  qualities  of  material  subjects.  If  our  senses 
could'be  so  far  misled  that  the  essences  of  flesh  and  blood 
could  be  covered  under  the  sensible  qualities  of  bread  and 


4^4 

wine,  we  could  bave  no  criterion  left  by  which  to  judge  of 
any  miracle ;  the  whole  rational  evidence  of  religion  would 
be  annihilated  by  this  single  position.  Besides,  it  involves 
the  most  palpable  contradiction,  which  it  is  scarcely  worthy 
your  time  to  point  out,  that  the  same  body  should  be  entire 
in  heaven,  and  upon  earth  ;  in  ten  thousand  pieces  of  bread, 
or  drops  of  wine  ;  and  in  ten  thousand  different  places  at  the 
same  time.  And  a  man,  according  to  this  monstrous  absurdi- 
ty, by  living  on  the  sacramental  elements,  might  become 
transmuted,  vile  as  he  is,  into  the  real  body  of  our  blessed 
Saviour.  The  follies  of  this  doctrine  were  strongly  combat- 
ted  by  the  protestant  writers  of  the  last  age  ;  for,  having  re- 
cently emerged  from  the  bosom  of  popery,  they  were  every 
where  mingled  with  numerous  adherents  to  that  superstition. 
But  in  our  age,  and  country,  little  need  be  said  to  guard  pi- 
ous men  against  such  an  irrational  dogma.  The  disciples  of 
popery  allege,  in  support  of  this  strange  opinion,  the  words 
of  our  Lord  himself; — This  is  my  body  which  is  broken  for 
you  ;  making  him  to  be  alive,  and  breaking,  and  distributing 
his  dead  body  at  the  same  time.  The  expression  which  follows 
might  have  cured,  or  prevented  this  mistake — do  this  in  re- 
membrance of  me,  as  a  standing  memorial  of  my  death.  It 
is  a  plain,  and  obvious  figure  of  speech,  familiar  in  the  lan- 
guage of  all  nations.  A  sentence  of  Cicero,  which  seems 
as  if  written  with  a  view  to  this  occasion,  might  have  been  a 
sufficient  refutation  of  the  absurd  interpretation  of  this  lan- 
guage.—" Dum  fruges  Cererem,  vinom  Liber um  dicimus^ 


495 

genere  no9  quidem  serraonis  utiraur  usltato,  setl  ecquen  tam 
amentera  esse  putas,  qui  Illiid,  quo  vescalur  Dcum  credat  es. 
se  V  Cic.  de  nat.  Deor.  lib.  3.  chap.  IG.  §.  41. 

Transnbstantiation  is  a  doctrine  of  which  we  find  nolhinc 
in  the  writers  who  flourished  in  the  four,  or  five  first  centu- 
ries of  the  church.  In  the  sixth  century,  the  elevation  of 
the  host,  as  it  began  then  figuratively  to  be  called,  was  first 
introduced  ;  not,  however,  for  the  purpose  of  adoration,  but 
that  all  might  see  it,  and  that  it  might  the  better  represent 
the  elevation  of  Christ  upon  the  cross.  It  was  not,  until  the 
extreme  ignorance  of  the  twelfth,  and  thirteenth  centuries^ 
that  this  idolatrous  opinion  and  practice  generally  prevailed. 

The  consequences,  and  abuses  of  this  doctrine  we  have 
seen  in  the  denial  of  the  cup  to  the  laity — the  idolatrous  ado- 
ration of  the  host — sending  it  to  the  absent — keeping  it  in 
their  houses,  and  about  their  persons,  as  a  charm — carrying 
it  through  the  streets  on  occasions  of  great  public  calamity- 
giving  it  to  the  dead,  by  laying  it  on  their  breasts,  especially 
if  they  were  priests,  and  evgn  burying  it  with  them  as  a  pass- 
port to  heaven. 

OF  CON3UBSTANTIATIOX, 

It  is  so  difficult  entirely  to  divest  the  mind  of  its  prejudi- 
ces, and  to  cast  oflf  errors  which  h-wn  incorporafed  fhem' 


499 

selves  deeply  with  our  habits  of  thinking,  that  Luther,  and 
his  followers,  although  convinced  of  the  error  and  absurdity 
of  transubstanliation,  were  attracted,  by  the  power  of  preju- 
dice, into  some  unintelligible  resemblance  of  their  ancient 
principle.  They  condemned  the  absurdity,  if"  not  impietyj 
of  the  actual  transmutation  of  the  bread  and  wine  into  the 
real  body  and  blood  of  the  Son  of  God ;  but,  in  a  language 
not  much  more  clear  and  comprehensible,  maintained  that 
this,  precious  sacrifice  was  wholly  received  in,  with,  and 
tinder,  the  elements  in  the  supper.  I  do  not  profess  to  ex- 
plain these  mysterious  terms  ;  but,  if  they  have  any  definite 
meaning,  they  embrace  one  of  the  principal  absurdities  which 
embarrass  the  other  doctrine.- — They  represent  the  same 
body  as  present  in  many  different  places  at  the  same  time. 
The  great  refgrmer  impressed,  by  his  education,  with  a  su- 
perstitious veneration  for  the  symbols  jised  in  this  ordinance, 
wished  equally  to  avoid  the  error  into  which  the  Catholics 
had  been  led,  and  to  favour  his  own  prejudices,  and  there- 
fore embraced  a  form  of  expression,  which  imposed  upon  him- 
self, while  it  was  destitute  of  any  clear  and  definite  meaning, 

OF  THE    REQUISITE  QUALIFICATIONS  IN  THOSE  WHO 

WOULD  WORTHILY  PARTAKE  OF  THE 

lord's  SUPPER. 

Many  writers  have  alleged,  and  of  these  not  a  few  in  the 
very  first  ages,  that  the  constitution  of  the  christian  and  vish 


hie  church  requires,  that  those  who  have  been  initiated  by 
baptism,  should  be  introduced  also  to  the  participation  of  its 
ultimate  sacrament  in  the  Lord's  Supper.     This  opinion  ari« 
ses  from  a  misconception  of  the  nature  and  design  of  (he  two 
ordinances ;  which  may  be  learned  from  a  small  attention  to 
the  origin  of  the  church.     Baptism  was  designed  to  make  a 
visible  and  public  proposition  of  salvation  on  the  terms  of  the 
New  Covenant,  to  those  who,  otherwise,  were  the  heirs  of 
death,   through   the  condemnation  of  the  original  covenant. 
To  every  baptized  infant  this  proposition  of  salvation  is  pro- 
visionally made,  on  the  conditions  of  repentance  and  faith  in 
our  Lord  Jesus  Christ.      So  far,  then,  the  infant  is  the  pas- 
sive  subject,  or  recipient  of  the  divine  mercy  in  this  ordi- 
nance.    And  it  is  his  visible  warrant  to  embrace  these  gra- 
cious terms  of  our  redemption.     The  Lord's  Supper,  on  the 
other   hand,  is  an  active  service;    and  contains  an  active 
pledge  of  our  having  embraced  the  covenant,  and  of  our 
fidelity  to  all  its  conditions.     This  places  a  material  diflfer- 
ence  between  the  two  ordinances,  and  requires  in  particular, 
of  those  who  would  worthily  partake  of  the  Lord's  Supper, 
"  that  they  examine  themselves  of  their  knowledge  to  discern 
the  Lord's  body,  of  their  faith  to  feed  upon  him,  of  their  re- 
pentance, love,  and  new  obedience."      A  condition  which 
cannot  reasonably  be  required  of  infants. — Without  a  just 
knowledge  of  the  nature  and  design  of  the  ordinance,  we  can- 
not  offer  a  rational,  and  acceptable  service  in  it  to  Almighty 
God.     Faith  is  requisite  to  give  importance  to  the  ob|ect^of 


fir? 


^ 


498 

cur  worship,  and  a  proper  interest  in  the  duty.  While  we 
celebrate  the  dying  love  of  our  Redeemer,  it  becomes  us, 
with  profound  humility,  and  repentance,  to  recollect  the  sins 
for  which  he  endured  such  sufferings,  and  with  the  most 
lively  gratitude  and  love,  to  recal  him  to  mind  who  laid 
down  his  life  that  nx  might  live. 

I  add,  farther,  that,  as  this  ordinance  is  a  feast  of  charity 
and  love,  it  is  most  highly  requisite,  that  all  who  would  wor- 
thily partake  of  it  should  be  in  perfect  peace  with  their  breth- 
ren ;  be  ever  ready  to  forgive  their  enemies,  and  cherish  no 
hatred  against  any  man.  Charity  among  our  fellow  men  is 
the  truest  image  of  God  our  Heavenly  Father.  But  in  the 
exercise  of  the  discipline  of  (he  rhnrr.h,  we  ran  only  examine 
into  the  knowledge  of  the  communicant ;  receive  the  pro- 
fession of  his  faith  ;  and  see  that  his  external  deportment  is 
consistent  with  the  doctrine  and  example  of  his  Saviour. 

OF     THE  BENEFITS  OF    A  SERIOUS  AND  PIOUS    USE  OF  THIg 
HOLY  ORDINANCE,  AND  THE  DANGERS  OF  ITS  ABUSE. 

Before  concluding  these  observations  on  the  Lord's  Sup- 
per, suffer  me  very  shortly  to  remark  the  benefits  resulting 
from  a  devout  attendance  on  this  holy  ordinance  ;  and  the 
dangers  of  its  abuse.  Its  evident  tendency  is  to  confirm  our 
resolutions  of  duty,  and  to  awaken  and  strengthen  all  the  gra- 
ces of  the  christian  life.     But  as  every  act  of  religion  per- 


499 

formed- in  an  irreverent  manner,  contributes  to  harden  the 
heart,  and  alienate  it  more  from  real  and  vital  holiness,  these 
consequences,  in  a  much  higher  degree,  attend,  or  follow  the 
abuse  of  an  institution  so  sacred  and  solemn.  In  the  first  age 
of  the  church,  raanj  insincere  disciples,  only  partially  re- 
claimed from  paganism,  misled  by  the  ideas  and  habils  ex- 
isting in  the  festivals  of  the  heathen  gods,  introduced  a  licen- 
tiousness in  i(s  celebration,  highly  unbecoming  the  sanctity, 
and  purity  of  the  christian  church.  In  that  miraculous  pe- 
riod, the  disorder  was  consequently,  followed  by  visible  and 
frequently  instantaneous  judgments  from  Almighty  God. 
For  this  cause,  saith  the  apostle,  many  are  weak  and  sick- 
ly  among  yon,  and  many  sleep.  And,  probably,  to  these 
effects  chiefly,  the  same  aposlle  had  reference  when  he  utters 
the  following  denunciation — "  He  that  eateth,  and  driuketh 
unworthily,  eateth  and  drinketh  judgment  to  himself,  not 
discerning  the  Lord's  body." 

These  terrible  examples  of  divine  displeasure,  thus  mira- 
culously inflicted,  seem  to  have  contributed  to  throw  the 
christians  of  the  following  age  into  the  opposite  extreme  of 
excessive  fear,  and  superstitious  veneration  of  this  holy  ordi- 
nance. Since  miracles  have  ceased,  the  judgments  which 
follow  the  abuse  of  the  Lord's  Supper,  appear  to  be  rather 
of  a  spiritual,  than  a  temporal  nature — lukewarmness  in  eve- 
ry pious  feeling,  and  hardness  of  heart,  which  gradually  leads 
to  the  total  dereliction  of  the  oflices  of  piety.     This  fearful 


DUO 

state  of  abandonment  by  God,  is,  perhaps,  more  hastened  by 
an  iii. proper  use  of  this  holy  rife,  than  by  all  other  deficien- 
cies in  religious  duty,  and,  almost,  by  all  other  vices. 

Other  pretended  sacraments,  added  to  the  ritual  of  the 
holy  scriptures  by  the  church  of  Rome,^  it  is  unnecessary 
to  take  up  your  time  either  to  explain  or  refute.  I  proceed, 
therefore,  to  a  brief  consideration  of  our  future  state  of  exis- 
tence. 

*  Confirmation,  Penance,  Ordination,  Marriage,  Ejitreme  Unction. 


ON 

A  FUTURE  STATE. 


The  last  doctrine  of  revelation  which  remains  to  be  con- 
sidered,  is  that  of  our  future  stale  of  being.  The  hope  of  ex- 
isting after  the  present  life  was  not  utterly  lost  from  among 
mankind,  even  amidst  the  darkness  and  corruptions  of  pagan- 
ism. But,  to  the  vulgar  mass,  the  prospect  was  so  obscure, 
and  the  hope  so  uncertain,  that  it  could  afford  but  small  ex- 
citement to  duty  in  life,  and  to  the  timid,  and  miserable,  but 
little  consolation  in  their  last  moments.  It  was  so  blended 
with  the  melancholy  phantoms  of  a  superstitious  imagination, 
it  served  rather  to  oppress  than  shed  any  comfort  on  the  hour 
of  death.  We  have  seen  in  our  disquisitions  on  natural  reli- 
gion, and  its  ultimate  motives  to  virtue,  that  many  of  their 
sages  were  able  to  create  to  themselves  more  reasonable,  but 
still  dubious  expectations  of  existing  hereafter.  But  it  is  on- 
ly in  the  word  of  God,  and,  especially,  in  the  gospel  of  our 
blessed  Saviour,  that  the  trembling  hopes  of  nature  are  ren- 
dered fixed  and  certain,  and  the  obscurities  of  reason,  are 
enlightened.  And  to  the  doctrine  of  the  immortality  of  the 
soul  it  has  added  a  principle  which  the  human  mind  had  nev- 
er before  dared  to  conceive  -,  I  mean  the  resurrection  of  the 


body,  and  its  future  and  eternal  union  with  the  soul,  as  res- 
pects the  pious,  in  a  happy  state  of  existence  ;  but  the  im- 
pious in  a  state  of  misery. 

This  doctrine  is  peculiarly  a  doctrine  of  revelation.  On 
this  authority  simply  our  credence,  or  faith  ought  to  be  found- 
ed. It  is  one  of  the  chief  glories  of  Christ,  our  Redeemer, 
that  he  hath  brought  life  andr immortality  to  light ;  and  so 
hath  rescued  it  from  the  blindness  of  sense,  and  the  doubtful- 
ness of  reason.  But  in  the  sacred  scriptures,  the  doctrine 
of  our  future  existence  is  so  intimately  blended  with  that  of 
the  resnrreciion  of  the  body,  that  we  can  hardly  consider 
them  apart ;  and  it  is  this  which  renders  the  whole  revela- 
tion of  this  doctrine  peculiarly  precious  to  man,  as  it  brings 
our  future  being  more  within  the  comprehension  of  the  mind, 
and  gives  it  a  stronger  interest  in  the  heart  which  knows  no 
other  condition  of  human  existence  but  this  compound  state 
of  being.  The  immortahty  of  the  soul  would  have  been  ea- 
sily received  by  both  the  Jews  and  the  Greeks.  It  already 
formed  part  of  the  popular  belief.  It  was  the  resurrection 
which  created  among  these  people  so  much  astonishment,  and 
was  received  wilh  so  much  incredulity.  To  combat  this  in- 
fidelity, and  place  our  immortal  life  upon  its  true  foundation, 
the  apostle  sets  himself  in  this  part  of  his  epistle  to  the  Corin- 
thians, where  he  informs  us  that  "  this  corruptible  shall  put 
on  incorruption,  and  this  mortal  shall  put  on  immortality." 


iiQ3 

That  we  shall  continue  lo  exist  from  the  moment  of  death, 
till  the  final  introduction  of  our  immortal  state,  the  scriptures 
give  us  no  reason  to  entertain  a  doubt,  but  wherein  that  inter- 
mediate condition  shall  consist,  as  thej  have  not  condescend- 
ed to  inform  us,  it  would  be  presumptuous  in  us  to  frame  an 
opinion.  On  the  subject  of  the  resurrection,  and  of  our  in:\- 
mortal  life,  they  are  as  explicit  as,  perhaps,  it  is  competent 
to  our  present  state  of  frailty,  and  mortality  to  comprehend. 

Let  us,  therefore,  with  the  sacred  writer,  employ  a  few 
moments  in  contemplating  the  certainty  and  importance  of 
this  doctrine,  its  practical  uses,  and  its  spiritual  consola- 
tions. — Its  certainty  can,  to  the  christian,  rest  only  on  the 
express  declaration  of  the  word  of  God  ;  although,  when  thus 
communicated,  many  facts  and  analogies,  drawn  from  the 
course  of  nature,  concur  to  facilitate  our  conceptions,  and 
strengthen  our  confidence  in  this  precious  hope.  "  The 
time  is  coming,"  saith  the  infallible  Spirit  of  truth,  "  when 
all  they  who  are  in  their  graves  shall  hear  the  voice  of  the 
Son  of  Man,  and  shall  come  forth,  they  that  have  done  well 
to  the  resurrection  of  life,  and  tliey  that  have  done  evil  to 
the  resurrection  of  damnation."  It  has  always  been  a  sub- 
ject of  anxious  inquiry  to  human  reason  ;  with  what  bodies 
do  they  come  ?  C  ui  these  corporeal  systems,  after  they 
have  been  long  dissolved  into  their  original  elements,  and  va- 
riously dispersed  in  a  thousand  different  directions,  and  af- 
ter they  have  snccessively  passed,  perhaps,  into  a  thou'^and 


504 

other  an'iDiated  systems,  be  again  collected  and  reorganized  iti 
the  same  body  which  perished  at  death  ?  If  it  were  possi- 
ble, would  it  be  a  reasonable  object  of  desire  in  that  spirit- 
ual and  immortal  state,  that  the  soul  should  be  again  united  to 
a  sluggish  mass  which  might  be  regarded  as  its  former  prison, 
which  impaired  its  active  powers,  and  was  perhaps  the  seat 
of  all  the  errors  of  reason,  and  of  all  the  disorders  of  the 
passions  ? 

The  same  objections  have  ever  been  presented  as  insolva- 
ble  difficulties  to  reason.  But  what  christian  can  entertain  a 
doubt  concerning  the  Almighty  power,  and  the  omniscient 
wisdom  of  God,  which  is  equally  able  to  accomplish  the  re- 
surrection, as  the  creation  of  human  nature  ?  The  apostl^ 
meets  the  difficulty  by  a  beautiful  image  taken  from  the  grain 
"which  the  husbandman  casts  into  the  earth.  It  seems  to  pe- 
rish.  It  becomes  a  mass  of  putrefaction.  But  there  is  a 
delicate,  and  almost  imperceptible  germ  which  survives,  and 
presently  assumes  a  new,  and  much  more  beautiful  form. 
Can  we  doubt  but  that  the  whole  vegetable,  with  all  its  appa- 
ratus  of  fruits  and  flowers,  was  included  in  that  minute  and 
invisible  particle  which  receives  a  new  life  in  the  midst  of 
death  ?  On  the  resurrection  another  lesson  is  suggested  to 
as  from  the  numerous  transmutations  of  the  insect  tribes 
which  daily  pass  under  our  review.  A  deformed  and  slug- 
?54sh  grub  weaves  a  tomb  for  itself.     It  seems  to  become  ex^ 


505 

lincf.     But,  in  a  little  time,  we  sec  it  mount  into  the  air  in  a 
new  form,  and  adorned  with  the  most  beautiful  colojiring. 

Of  spiritual  and  celestial  objects,  which  are  so  far  above 
the  reach  of  our  present  faculties,  frequently,  we  are  left  to 
collect   our  judgments  only  from  analogy.     And  although 
such  analogies  can  never  convey  adequate  images  of  things 
which  eye  hath  not  seen,  and  of  which  it  hath  not  entered  in- 
fo the  heart  of  man  to  conceive,  yet  they  seem  to  throw- 
some  feeble  rays  of  light  upon  them,  and  to  offer  some  foun- 
dation on  which  the  mind,  exhausted  by  its  own  efforts,  can 
rest.     In  casting  our  view  around,  then,  nature  teaches  us 
important  lessons,  and  presents  to  us  many  impressive  ima- 
ges of  the  future  resurrection  of  the  body.     Some  resem 
blance  of  it  we  see  in  the  new  creation  which  every  vernal 
season   produces,  when  all  the  glories  of  the  year  are  seen 
to   spring,  if   I  may  speak  so,  from  the  tomb  of  Winter- 
These  images,  indeed,  are  only  imperfect  representations, 
adapted  to  the  weakness  of  our  nature,  of  that  great  object  of 
our  faith.      The  only  solid  and  immovable  foundation  of  a 
christian's   hope,   as   I   have  already  said,   is   the   word  of 
God,  but  now  is  Christ  risen,  and  become  the  first  fruits  of 
them  that  steep. 

Another  objection  against  the  doctrine  of  a  resurrection  is 
drawn,  from  the  ills  and  inconveniencies  resulting  to  the  soul 
from  its  iVnion  with  the  body  iti  the  present  life.     This  slug- 


gish  and  unwieldy  mass  of  matter  is  supposed  to  be  rather  tlid 
prison  than  the  helpful  companion  of  the  soul ;  to  have  a  ten- 
dency to  cloud,  and  darken  the  clearness  of  its  perceptionSj 
and  to  oppress  and  enchain  the  activity  of  its  powers. — Al- 
though these  evils  should  be  justly  objected  to  the  present 
gross  and  disordered  bodies  which  we  inhabit,  yet  such  is 
the  nature  and  order  of  human  spirits  that  it  is  only  by  being 
united  to  some  corporeal  system  that  they  can  receive  any 
ideas  at  all.     And,  at  the  resurrection  of  the  just,  all  that  is 
gross,  all  that  is  disordered,  all  that  is  impure,  we  are  assur- 
ed from  revelation,  shall  be  for  ever  separated  from  the  bo- 
dies of  the  saints  raised  in  immortal  life  ;  and,  we  are  farther 
taught  to  believe,  that  their  powers,  their  activity,  and  glory 
shall  correspond  with  the  exalted  rank  which  the  soul  shall 
hold  in  the  scale  of  being  in  her  celestial  state. — If  it  be  ask- 
ed, whether  these,  can  be  the  saoiC  bodies  that  we  inhabited 
here,  which  shall  assume  such  diflferent  properties,  and  pre- 
sent so  much  more  glorious  an  appearance  ? — Certainly  this 
cannot  be  incredible  to  a  christian,  or  a  philosopher,  when 
we  are  continually  beholding  the   same  elements  receiving 
from  the  hand  of  nature  the  most  various  forms.     Do  not  the 
same  elements  compose  the  unsightly  clay  which  we  trample 
under  our  feet,  and  the  resplendent  diamond  which  imitates 
the  sun  in  the  crowns  of  princes  ?     The  lightning  which,  ia 
its  destructive  course,  rends  oaks,  and  rocks  to  pieces,  and 
the  mild  and  glorious  rays  of  the  orb  that  gives  life,  and 
health,  and  beauty  to  the  whole  universe.     Accordingly  the 


apostle  hath  said,  that  all  flesh  is  not  the  same  iu  its  outvrard 
for/n,  and  visible  appearance ;  but  "  there  is  one  flesh  of 
men,  and  another  of  beasts,"  though  nourished  by  the  same 
herbage  ;  "  there  is  one  giory  of  the  sun,  and  anotLer  glory 
of  the  moon,  and  another  of  the  stars ;"  though  all  proceed- 
ing from  the  same  light.  Not  less  difference  may  we  expect 
to  find,  between  our  present  tenements  of  clay,  which,  at 
death,  return  to  their  original  dust,  and  those  celestial  tem- 
ples, io  which  the  glorified  spirit  shall  dwell  forever.  Rais- 
ed to  heaven  by  the  power  and  love  of  the  Redeemer,  to  in- 
habit the  worlds  of  light  above,  this  corporeal  system  will  be 
conform*»d  in  beauty  and  perfection  to  its  imcnortal  habitation. 
— •**  This  mortal  shall  put  on  iiumortality.  Sown  in  weak- 
ness, it  shall  be  raised  in  power  ;  sown  in  dishonour,  it  shall 
be  raised  in  glory  ;  sown  a  natural,"  that  is,  a  gross  and  ani- 
mal *'  body,  it  shall  be  raised  a  spiritual  body" — a  body,  in- 
conceivably refined,  and  purified  from  the  dregs  of  matter, 
and  possessing,  at  once,  the  rapid  energy,  and  the  imperish- 
able nature  of  spirit.  It  shall  be  invested  with  new  forms, 
and  be  fitted  with  new  organs,  adapted  to  its  celestial  state ; 
and  having  attained  its  highest  perfection,  we  have  the  same 
authority  to  declare  that  it  shall  for  ever  shine  with  undecay- 
iog  lustre  in  the  kingdom  of  God. 

In  addition  to  the  christian  doctrine  of  the  immortality  of 
the  soul,  which  contains  the  most  glorious  hope  of  human 
nature,  the  resurrection  of  the  body  and  its  hnmortal  exis* 


508 

tence  in  reunion  with  the  soul,  is  peculiarly  precious  to  man 
hy  the  very  constitution  of  his  nature,  meets,  in  the  best 
possible  manner,  his  ideas,  and  hopes  of  happiness. 

Spirits  there  may  be  of  a  superior  order  which  have  no 
connexion  with  any  material  sjstem,  and  are  not  depen* 
dent,  for  their  knowledge,  or  their  enjoyments  on  any  sensi- 
ble organs.  But  of  their  modes  of  existence,  and  their  sour- 
ces pf  happiness,  we  can  frame  no  conception.  All  our 
ideas,  and  ali  oar  pleasures  come  to  us  through  the  medium 
of  sense.  And  our  spirits  are  of  such  an  order,  as  has  been 
before  remarked,  that  their  knowledge,  their  felicity,  their  per- 
fection, depend  on  their  connexion,  in  some  way,  with  a  corpo- 
real  system.  Every  thing  connects  us  with  the  body,  every 
thing  attaches  us  to  the  body.  Hence  the  apostle  has  said  ; 
-f"  We,  who  are  iu  this  tabernacle,  do  groan,  being  burdened, 
not  that  we  would  be  unclolhed  ;"  not,  that  it  is  the  object  of 
these  anxious  wishes  to  be  disembodied,  "  but  that  we  may 
be  clothed  upon  with  our  house  which  is  from  heaven  ;"  with 
that  celestial,  and  regenerated  body  which  shall  be  freed 
from  all  the  pains  and  imperfections  of  this  mortal  flesh,  and 
which  is  only  our  present  nature  exalted  to  its  ultimate  per- 
fection and  glory.  "  The  earnest  expectation  of  the  creature," 
continues  the  same  apostle,  "  waiteth  for  the  manifestation  of 
the  sons  of  God,"  at  the  resurrection  of  the  just.  "  The 
whole  creation  groanetb,  even  those  who  have  received  the 
gifts  of  the  Spiiit,  groan  within  themselves,  waiting  for  the 


X 


509 

It'^deniptiou  of  the  body." — What,  indeed,  would  be  the 
pleasure  of  existence  to  the  soul,  if  we  conld  suppose  it  con- 
scious of  existence,  deprived  of  the  action,  and  ai'is  of  (he 
senses,  which  are,  at  present,  the  only  inlets  of  its  know- 
ledge, and  Ihe  chief  sources  of  its  enjoyments? 

As  the  christian,  and  scriptural  doctrine  of  the  resurrection 
corresponds,  in  this  manner,  wilh  the  dearest  hopes,  and 
wishes  of  the  human  heart,  it  contributes  likewise,  to  assist 
the  perceptions  of  faith.  We  are  not  left  in  total  darkness 
concerning  the  nature  of  our  future  being.  Some  ideas  we 
may  frame  with  relation  to  this  obscure  subject,  without  the 
hazard  of  being  entirely  lost  in  the  unsubstantial  regions  of 
fancy.  The  state  of  our  future  existence  presents  to  us,  no 
longer  an  inscrutable  mystery.  Although  it  offers  to  our 
hopes  a  condition  of  existence  inconceivably  improved  and 
raised  above  the  present,  still  we  can  discern  between  them 
some  points  of  resemblance,  which  present  to  us  ideas  on 
that  subject,  at  once  intelligible  to  our  reason,  and  infinitely 
precious  to  the  heart. — In  a  future  life,  we  have  reason  to 
believe,  our  faculties  will  be  employed,  in  some  measure,  as 
here,  but  with  an  activity  and  vigour  inconceivably  augment- 
ed, in  searching  into  the  wonderful  works  of  God,  io  admir- 
ing the  order,  the  beauty,  and  harmony  of  the  universal  sya- 
tem  ;  in  adoring,  and,  with  th?  angel?,  endeavouring  to  pen- 
etrate the  astonishing  mysteries  of  divine  grace  to  man. 
Blessed,  and  eternal  sources  of  knowledge,  and  felicity! 


r 


The  faculties  which  we  now  feebly  exert,  in  the  search  of 
truth,  and  in  the  service  of  our  Creator  and  Redeemer, 
will  be  new  created  in  celestial  vigour,  and  raised  in  a  state  of 
undescribable  perfection.  All  the  obstacles  to  our  advance- 
ment in  knowledge,  at  present,  arising  from  the  narrowness 
of  this  corporeal  sphere,  the  imperfection  of  these  mortal 
powers,  the  inactivity,  and  sluggishness  of  these  gross  and 
earthly  organs  will  be  removed.  That  carnal  and  disorder- 
ed mass  which  now  renders  the  body  the  seat  of  impure  pas- 
sions, and  impedes  the  holy  aspirations  of  the  soul,  will  be 
refined  and  purified.  A  body  of  r.elestial  light ;  a  spiritual 
body,  as  it  is  styled  by  the  apostle  ;  that  is,  a  body  active 
and  unembarrassed  in  its  movements  like  spirit,  rapid  as  im- 
agination and  thought,  will,'  in  heaven,  be  the  fit  instrument 
of  the  glorified  scul,  in  its  sublime,  and  blissful  employments. 

From  the  doctrine  of  the  resurrection  of  the  same  person 
results  a  consoling  anticipation  arising  from  the  knowledge 
of  our  pious  friends  with  whom  we  have  been  connected  up- 
on earth  ;  the  reunion,  in  the  highest  felicity,  of  the  same 
hearts  which  have  been  united  here  in  the  tenderest  affections. 
What  ravishing  pictures  may  imagination  frame,  without 
being  liable  to  the  charge  of  a  fallacious  enthusiasm,  of  friend- 
ships renewed  in  heaven  ;  of  the  mutual  joys  of  pious  friends 
who  meet  on  that  happy  and  eternal  shore,  escaped  from  all 
the  ills  and  dangers  of  life ;  of  their  sweet  intercourse,  puri- 
fi^ed  from  all  the  passions,  and  weaknesses  of  the   flesbj 


5U 

iFhich  diatiirb  the  harmony  of  (his  world  ;  of  the  range  tlie/ 
may  be  peruaitted  to  enjoy,  in  society  with  one  another,  amid 
the  glories  of  the  heavenly  world,  to  nourish  their  celestial 
devotions,  and  diversify  their  holy  enjoyments  ;  of  those 
flights  which  Ihey  may  be  allowed  to  take  together  into  dis- 
tant provinces  of  the  universal  empire  of  God  to  collect 
knowledge,  and  to  admire  and  adore  him  in  the  astonishing 
operations  of  his  hands ;  or  of  the  raptures  with  which  every 
ray  of  the  Sun  of  righteousness  will  penetrate  their  hearts, 
when  they  turn  their  faces  towards  the  heavenly  Zion,  the 
more  immediate  residence  of  the  divine  glory,  to  raise  their 
common  ascriptions  of  praise  to  the  Father  of  the  universe, 
and  to  recognize,  at  the  foot  of  his  throne,  their  boundless 
obligations  to  redeeming  love. — But  restraining  all  unlicensed 
excursions  of  fancy,  exquisite,  and  now  InetTable  must  be  the 
felicity,  springing  from  a  thousand  different  sources,  that 
shall  arise  froom  meeting  in  those  blissful  habitations,  the 
friends  who  have  been  most  tenderly  and  affectionately  loved 
upon  earth.  Oh  !  how  is  the  religion  of  our  blessed  Saviour 
adapted  to  the  finest  feelings,  and  fitted  to  cherish  the  no- 
blest sympathies  of  the  human  heart  I — Away  with  that  cold 
philosophy,  which,  at  death,  would  devote  our  existence  to 
eternal  oblivion,  and  hopelessly  rend  asunder  those  delightfal 
unions  which  form  the  dearest  portion  of  ourselves  ;  the 
chief  joy  of  our  being. — Jesus!  Saviour!  who  art  the  first 
fruit  of  the  resurrection  of  the  dead!  who  art  thyself  the 
resurrection  and  the  life  I  we  adore  and  blnss  thee  who  hast 


given  this  cousoladoii  to  suffering  hunianitj  .'  What  Sublim^; 
and  glorious  prospects  does  our  holy  religion  present  to  the 
imaginafion  !  what  blessed  hopes  to  the  heart ! — But  who 
Can  speak,  as  they  deserve,  of  those  scenes  of  everlasting 
peace  ;  of  those  mansions  ilhiminated  by  the  eternal  splen- 
dours of  the  Sun  of  righteousness :  those  bodies  of  light ; 
those  souls  of  fire  !  "  t^ye  hath  not  seen,  nor  hath  ear  heard, 
neither  hath  it  entered  into  the  heart  of  man  to  conceive  the 
things  which  God  hath  prepared  for  those  who  love  him." 

OF  THE  FUTURE  AITD  ETERNAL  PUNISHMENT  OF  THE 
WICKED. 

The  doctrine  of  the  resurrection,  and  of  an  eternal  exists 
ence  beyond  the  grave  relates  to  the  whole  race  of  man, 
and  embraces  equally  the  righteous,  and  the  wicked.  For, 
as  the  former  shall  rise  to  glory  and  immortality,  the  latter 
also  shall  be  raised  to  shame  and  everlasting  contempt. 
Under  the  Second  Adam  human  nature  recovers  its  immor- 
tality, and  it  is,  under  his  administration,  ptit  into  a  new- 
state  of  trial.  The  whole  doctrine  of  a  future  state,  how- 
ever, and  of  the  manner  of  our  existence  there,  not  being  (he 
subject  of  sense,  and  being  entirely  beyond  the  range  of  hu- 
man experience,  all  knowledge  concerning  it  must  be  deriv- 
ed solely  from  revelation.  Reason  can  pronounce  nothing 
with  certainty,  on  the  subject.  We  must  take  it  simply  as 
H  is  stated  in  the  word  of  God.     And  here  we  find  the  ever- 


^ 


hsting  punishmcDt  of  the  wicked  asserted  in  terras  as  expli- 
cit and  strong  as  the  life,  and  felicity  of  the  pious  ;  it  ig, 
Iherefore,  equally  entitled  to  our  assciif,  and  most  imperious- 
ly commands  our  belief.  Of  the  I'nrighleous  it  is  said, 
"  they  shall  be  cast  into  the  lake  that  burneth  with  Ore  and 
brimstone ;"  and  it  is  added,  "  that  the  smoke  of  their  tor- 
ments ascendeth  for  ever  and  ever."  In  the  final  judgment 
of  the  world,  we  are  assured  that  the  Judge  shall  pronounce 
upon  them  this  irrevocable  senfence,  dqmrt  ye  cursed  into 
everlasting  fire  jireparcd  for  the  Devil  and  his  angels. 
These  are  strong  figurative  expressions  intended  (o  convey 
the  certainty,  and  the  fearful  nature  of  the  future  sufferings 
of  guilt ;  fire  being  employed  as  the  hyeroglyphic  emblem  of 
extreme  torments  of  the  body,  or  the  mind  ;  and  their  eternal 
duration  is  indicated  in  the  strongest  ter  s  that  language  can 
use.  Objections  are  brought  against  this  conclusion  so  in- 
teresting to  human  sympathy,  not  from  scripture,  as  they 
ought  to  be,  if  they  were  well  founded,  but  from  a  pretended 
reason,  where  reason  is,  and  forever  must  be  utterly  silent. 

Eternal  punishments  are  pronounced  to  be  contrary  to  the 
natural  perfection  of  the  Deity  which  consists  in  universal 
goodness. — It  is  said  to  be  contrary  to  the  design  of  his  mo- 
ral government,  which  is  intended  for  reformation  rather  than 
punishment;  and  aims  finally,  at  theperpei'':y  of  happiness 
to  all  virtuous  minds. — In  the  Inst  place  it  is  strenuously  ar- 
gued, that  eternal  pains  are  tlisproportioncd  to  the  frailty  of 

65 


f 


ji4 

offending  man,  and  to  the  shorlnessof  himiaa  lite,  in  whicb 
only  otfences  can  be  commit  fed. — A  simple  an,d  very  brief 
answer  muat  suffice  on  each  of  these  topics ;  for  as  we  are 
most  incompetent  judges  of  the  infinite  counsels  of  the  Sove- 
reign Mind,  our  supreme  duty  on  these  high  questions  is 
silence  and  submission. 

1 .  When  we  say  that  the  everlasting  punishment  of  the 
ivicked,  is  contrary  to  the  natural  and  essential  perfection  of 
Ood,  which  consists  in  universal  goodness,  and  the  love  of 
all  being — this  plea  being  introduced  on  the  present  occa- 
sion, as  a  defence  of  the  crimes  of  wicked  men  from  the  ri- 
gours of  the  divine  law,  is  treating  the  infinite  benignity  of  Je- 
Lovah,  as  consisting  merely  in  an  indulgent  regard  to  the 
frailties,  appetites,  and  passions  of  mankind.  These  sins 
must  necessarily  be  the  subjects  of  divine  animadversion ; 
and  the  essential  perfection  of  the  Deity,  which  includes 
justice  in  its  idea,  requires  the  punishment  of  crime,  not  less 
than  his  benignity  embraces  innocence  with  lo\e.  And  each 
in  strict  conformity  with  the  divine  peifection,  infinite  in  its 
mature  and  operations.  Justice  therefore  pursues  crime  with 
punishment,  as  long  as  the  subject  in  which  it  inheres  exists, 
— In  the  next  place,  if  the  essential  perfection  of  the  Deity- 
be  affirmed  to  consist  in  goodness,  let  us  inquire  wherein  that 
goodness  consists.  Is  it  not  in  the  love  of  being  ;  and,  ia 
rational  and  moral  beings,  in  virtue  as  essential  to  their  high- 
est happiness  ?  Every  affisctioHp  the  higher  and  purer  it  is. 


515 

implies  its  contrast.  Opposite  characters  anil  qualities,  be- 
come the  objects  of  opposite  purposes  and  feehngs.  In  pro- 
portion to  the  love  of  goodness  and  virtue,  must  be  llic  ah- 
liorrence  of  ini(juily,  and  crime.  And  these  must  be  as  per- 
manent as  their  subjects  on  the  one  side,  and  on  the  other  • 
that  is,  they  must  be  eternal. 

2.  When  again,  it  is  affirmed  that  eternal  suffering,  in  any 
part  of  the  works  of  God,  is  contrary  to  tlie  design  and  end 
of  his  universal  government,  which  is  reformation,  rather 
than  extermination,  or  the  perpetual  pains  of  any  portion  of 
his  creatures — Who,  then,  is  competent  to  embrace  in  his 
mind  the  boundless  extent  of  the  divine  government ;  its  ob- 
jects, its  ends,  or  the  measures  of  its  administration?  Or  how 
shall  a  worm  of  dust  pronounce  on  questions  so  high,  and  ut- 
terly beyond  the  ken  of  our  limited  faculties  ?  Take  a  sin- 
gle example  of  the  possible  benefits  which  may  result  to  the 
righteous  in  their  everlasting  career  of  happy  existence, 
from  the  continual  view  of  the  painful  and  unceasing  suffer- 
ings inflicted  upon  hardened  vice.  The  perpetuity  of  their 
virtue  may  be  greatly  assisted,  and  consequently  their  sta- 
bility in  happiness  be  not  a  little  promoted  by  occasional  dis- 
coveries of  the  issue  of  the  most  fortunate  state  of  sin, 
presented  to  them  as  most  alHictive,  hopeless,  remediless. 
We  have  the  faithful  promise  of  Almighty  God  for  the  cer- 
tain preservation  of  the  redeemed  from  falling.  But  surely 
this  stability  in  virtue  and  happiness  is  not  the  result  of  any 


516 

physical  necessKy  of  nature.  It  must  be  effected  by  prac- 
tical motives  adapted  to  the  ratlozial  and  morui  principles  of  a 
TJrtuous  and  holy  mind ;  in  the  everlasting  career  of  sanctifi- 
cation  and  blessedness,  the  saints  in  glory  will  be  moved,  ex- 
cited, reslrained,  or  stimulated  by  the  same  principles,  and 
motives,  but  highly  exalted,  and  improved,  which  govern 
the  most  holy  souls  in  the  present  life.  The  final  persever- 
ance of  the  redeemed,  though  most  securely  fixed  in  the 
promise  of  God,  is  for  ever  influenced  by  moral  principles, 
and  motives.  Who  then  can  say  that,  in  the  universal  gov- 
ernment of  God,  this  awful  and  eternal  example  of  suffering 
may  not  be  useful,  or  even  necessary  to  subserve  the  ends  of 
his  infinite  wisdom?  But  as  this  is  a  subject  on  which  rea- 
son cannot  pronounce,  being  lost  in  the  infinitude  of  the  uni- 
verse, and  of  the  divine  nature,  it  ceases  to  instruct,  and  re- 
fers us  to  the  simple  declarations  of  the  word  of  God.  Here 
must  we  resr,  assured  that  as  the  righteous  are  received 
into  life  eternal,  so  the  wicked  shOfll  go  away  into  ever- 
lasting punishment. 

The  enemies  of  this  doctrine,  in  the  last  place,  rely,  for 
the  support  of  their  opinion,  on  the  frailty  of  human  nature, 
which  cannot  with  justice,  -hey  say,  be  subjected  to  eternal 
sufferings :  and  to  the  shortness  of  human  life,  which  cannot 
have  formed  inveterate  habits,  or  contracted  a  degree  of 
gtiilt  in  any  proportion  to  such  pains.  1  reply,  that  these 
awiul  denunciations  affectmg  our  future  existence,  are  not 


\ 


517 

made  against  the  errors  merely  of  frailty,  but  against  obslp 
nale  and  determined  guilt,  shewn,  since  the  annunciation  of 
a  Saviour,  by  the  rejection  of  his  grace.  If  the  ^-in-*  of  man- 
kind are  the  ofTences  of  a  frail  and  feeble  nature,  their  sufTer- 
ings  will,  undoubtedly,  be  proportioned  to  the  imbecility  of 
\i>Q  offender ;  but  their  sinfulness,  inhering  in  their  nature  it- 
self, their  guilt  must  co-exist  with  their  being  ;  and  its  pen- 
alties, of  consequence  have  the  same  duration. — To  the  se- 
cond part  of  (his  objection,  respecting  the  shortness  of  life, 
it  is  reasonable  to  reply,  that  eternity  has  no  reference  to 
the  length  of  this  probatory  slate,  but  to  the  inherent  virtue 
or  vice  of  the  subject  of  trial;  for,  if  it  were  protracted  ten 
thousand  times,  it  could  not  bear  the  smallest  proportion  to 
our  interminable  existence.  The  wiidom  of  God  has  adapt- 
ed the  continuance  of  life,  together  with  all  its  means  of  in- 
struction, and  grace,  to  our  moral  culture,  and  preparation 
for  our  eternal  being  ;  if,  then,  they  fail  of  their  proper  object, 
the  cultivation  of  our  nature,  and  the  sinner  continues  in  his 
course  of  impiety,  it  can  only  be  ascribed  to  the  perversity 
of  his  nature,  which,  having  exhausted  the  day  of  grace  and 
mercy,  leaves  him  thereafter,  only  to  suffer  the  ri-*titeou3 
retributions  of  eternity.  Of  these  the  duration  must  be  ex- 
clusively learned  from  the  written  word.  No  reason  can  be 
assigned  for  the  cessation  of  future  punishment,  unless  it  could 
be  shewn,  contrary  to  all  probability,  that  the  actual  inflic- 
tion of  extreme  pains  would  produce  a  reformation  which  the 
apprehension  of  them,  aided  by  all  the  means  of  grace,  un- 


/ 


518 

der  the  direction  of  the  Holy  Spirit,  aud  the  powerful  assis- 
tances of  future  hopes  and  fears,  had  been  unable  to  effect. 
The  great  and  learned  Origen  believed  that  the  actual  en- 
durance of  punishment  in  the  next  life,  will  produce  moral 
effects  to  which  the  apprehensions  of  it  only  in  the  present 
state,  had  been  insufficient,  and  that  it  might  terminate,  af- 
ter a  long  course  of  ages,  in  the  reformation  of  the  most 
abandoned  sinner.  But,  says  the  equally  learned,  and  emi- 
nent bishop  Horsely  ;  "the  principle  that  the  effect  is  pos- 
sible, that  the  heart  may  be  reclaimed  by  force,  is,  at  best, 
precarious,  and  the  only  safe  principle  of  human  conduct  is 
the  belief  that  unrepented  sin  will  suffer  endless  punishment 
hereafter." 

In  the  conclusion  of  this  interesting  subject,  let  me  ask  -of 
the  professed  disciples  of  our  blessed  Lord  and  Saviour ; 
have  you  through  Christ,  the  assured  hope  of  thus  glo- 
riously rising  to  immortal  life  ?  Let  it  prove  to  you  the  most 
powerful  motive  to  cultivate  in  your  hearts  those  affections  of 
piety,  and  in  your  lives  those  habits  of  holiness,  which  will 
prepare  you  for  your  eternal  being  in  the  heavens. — By  tem- 
perance, by  purity,  by  the  exercise  of  virtue,  endeavour 
moie  and  more  to  assimilate  these  perishing  bodies,  to  that 
pure  and  celestial  nature  in  which  you  shall  hereafter  behold 
the  glory  of  God.  Remember  that  the  hope  of  rising  again 
to  everlasting  life,  strips  death  of  its  greatest  terrors.  Death 
is  no  longer  what  it  appears  to  be,  the  destruction  of  our  be- 


\ 


^19 

ing.  It  yields  to  the  grave  only  the  grosser  parts  of  these 
mortal  bodies.  The  temporary  dissolution  of  ihe  body,  and 
the  soul  causes  no  intermission  in  the  consciousness  of  hap- 
py exisfence.  Even  if  the  soul  itself,  according  to  the  opin- 
ion of  some  good  men,  should  sleep  till  the  revivification  of 
universal  nature,  there  is  no  peiception  of  lime  in  Ihe  insen- 
sibility of  this  mortal  sleep.  The  moment  of  disi.olution 
touches  upon  the  moment  of  our  restoration  to  life.  The 
grave,  sanctified  by  the  death,  and  triumphed  over  by  the 
resurrection  of  our  blessed  Saviour,  is  made  to  all  his  disciples 
only  the  gate  to  a  new,  a  glorious,  and  immortal  existence. 
"This  corruptible  shall  put  on  incorruption,  and  this  mortal 
shall  put  on  immortality.  O  death!  where  is  thy  sting ? 
O  grave  !  wl:ere  is  thy  victory  ?  The  sting  of  death  is  sin  3 
but  fhanks  be  to  God  who  giveth  us  the  victory  through  Je- 
sus Christ  our  Lord  !'^ 


^ 


r 


\ 


A  HEUiMO\, 

i^uEACHED  AT  THE    OPKNING   OF    TUlO   GENERAL   ASSKMIU  » 
OF  THE  PKESBYTERIAN  CHURCH  ;    I\  THE  VEAR  1  oOJ». 

EpisHe  0/  Jndr,  3rfrcr.v»',— That  you  should  contend  earnestly  for  the  fnilji 
once  delivered  to  the  Hair.ts, 

The  physical  order  t>flhings  i3  evidently  intended  by  the 
Creator  to  be  subservient  to  (he  benefit  of  the  moral  world. 
And  divine  wisdom  itself,  in  the  arrangements  of  nature,  and 
the  dispositions  of  providence,  seems  to  be  employed  an- 
premely  in  promoting  the  ends  of  divine  goodness.  In  con- 
formity with  this  order  established  in  the  universal  system, 
God  has  connected  the  knowledge  of  truth,  with  the  prac- 
tice of  duty,  and  the  duties  with  the  happiness  of  human  na- 
ture. The  connexion  of  truth  with  practical  utility,  is  ac- 
knowledged universally  in  science.  In  religion  alone  it  has 
been  doubted,  or  denied,  so  far  as  to  become  even  a  fashion- 
able maxim, — that  it  is  of  little  importance  to  piety,  or  virtue, 
what  opinions,  upon  these  subjects,  are  maintained  by  man- 
kind, provided  their  conduct  in  society  be  peaceable  and 
honest.  There  are  natural  sentiments  of  right  and  wrong  im- 
planted in  the  human  breast ;  and,  to  whatever  errors  in  ^pe• 
culation  the  weakness  of  reason,  or  the  preju»liccs  of  educa- 
tion, may  have  given  birth,  the  moral  instincts  of  oitr  nature. 


i 


522 

it  is  prcsumetl,  in  all  ordinary  cases,  will  correct  their  prac- 
tical evils.  Hence  has  resulted  an  unhappy  indifference  to 
religious  truth  in  those  who  embrace  this  maxim  ;  and,  with 
it  an  indifference  to  all  the  institutions  of  religion. 

The  apostle  Jude,  in  this  epistle,  apparently  from  a  deep 
conviction,  that  erroneous  principles  in  morals,  are  ever  pro- 
portionally connected  with  a  lax  virtue,  condemns  in  a  fer- 
vent and  indif^nant  style,  the  efforts  which  were  made,  in  that 
early  age,  to  corrupt  the  purity  and  simplicity  of  the  gospel 
oi  Christ.  In  opposition  to  the  insidious  arts  of  these  pre- 
tended disciples,  who  studied  to  turn  the  grace  of  God  into 
lasciviousness,  he  exhorts  his  christian  brethren  to  contend 
earnestly  for  the  faith,  zealously  to  maintain  the  truth  as  it  is 
in  Christ,  which  alone  is  able  to  redeem  men  from  all  ini- 
quity, and  make  them  wise  to  eternal  life» 

This  injunction  of  the  sacred  writer  rests  for  its  foundation 
on  the  inseparable  union  between  sound  principles  in  religion 
and  morals,  and  a  pure  and  virtuous  tenor  of  life.  It  strong- 
ly implies,  therefore,  that  every  real  christian,  and  especially 
that  every  minister  of  Christ,  is  under  sacred  and  indispen- 
sable obligations  to  search  for  the  truth  in  religion,  with 
faithfulness,  to  embrace  it  with  sincerity,  to  maintain  it  with 
firmness,  and  to  promote  it  with  zeaL 


A 


523 

If,  indeed,  evangelic  truth  had  no  peculiar  lelalioii  to 
Sanctity  of  life,  but  any  principles  were  equal  to  the  ends  of 
religion,  the  knowledge  of  it  would  not  merit  either  Ihe 
labour  bestowed  on  its  acquisition,  or  the  praise  ascribed  to 
its  possession ;  Christianity  itself  would  be  deprived  of  its 
chief  glory  ;  and  it  would  be  indifferent  to  every  purpose  of 
piety,  or  virtue,  whether  we  were  christians  or  pagans,  be- 
lievers or  infidels. 

In  the  following  discourse,  I  purpose,  under  the  divine 
blessing, 

I.  In  the  first  place,  to  illustrate  the  connexion  that  exists 
between  duty,  and  evangelic  truth;  or  generally  between 
principles  and  conduct. 

IF.  And  in  the  next  place,  to  urge  the  exhortation  of  the 
apostle,  to  contend  earnestly  for  thefaithy  the  fountain,  and 
comprehensive  sum  of  all  good  principles  in  religion. 

I.  Permit  me,  then,  in  the  first  pbce,  to  illustrate  the  cou- 
ncxion  that  exists  between  duty,  and  evangelic  truth,  and  in 
general,  between  principles  and  conduct. 

As  the  great  springs  of  human  action  lie  in  the  passions 
and  appetites,  the  desires  and  wants  of  men,  so  the  contro! 
and  direction  of  these  springs  is  to  be  found  only  in  an  un- 


-^ 


tiers tanding,  and  a  conscience  enlightened  by  divine  truth. 
An  it  is  a  fact  confirmed  bj  the  general  experience  of  the 
church  that,  if  the  mind  be  early  imbued  with  the  principles 
of  piety  and  virtue,  cultivated  under  a  regular  and  prudent 
dii5cipline,  it  usually  ripens  into  a  fixed  and  steady  character 
of  virtue,  and  by  the  co-opctation  of  the  Spirit  of  divine 
grace,  into  habits  of  sincere  and  fational  pletj^.  On  the  oth- 
er hand,  if  youth,  at  this  early  and  forming  period  of  life,  are 
sufifered  to  grow  up  without  moral  culture,  and  left  to  form 
their  principles  under  the  influenoe  of  vicious  companions, 
among  whom  they  are  taught  to  vindicate  the  indulgence  of 
the  passions,  by  the  corrupt  maxims  of  the  world,  there  is 
hardly  any  point  of  profligacy  in  thpir  manners,  at  which  we 
should  be  surprised  eventually  to  sey  them  arrive.  The  sys- 
tem of  truth,  indeed,  and  the  law  of  duly,  have  the  same 
common  source  in  the  perfections  and  the  will  of  God.  The 
more  perfectly  therefore  we  can  separate  it  from  every  im- 
pure mixture,  the  more  powerful  are  the  motives  which  we 
enjoy  to  universal  holiness  of  living. 

On  the  other  band,  is  it  not  one  of  the  plainest,  and  most 
obvious  conclusions  of  reason,  that,  if  men  embrace  princi- 
ples which  favour  the  passions,  and  remove  from  the  mind 
the  restraints  of  religion  ;  if  they  deny,  for  example,  the  ex- 
istence, or  the  providence  of  Almiglljy  God  ;  if  they  frame 
false  or  imperfect  conceptions  of  the  divine  attributes  ;  if 
they  invent  maxims  which,  in  a  state  of  dissolute  manners  is 


> 


iJ'lJ 


always  done,  <o  palliate  iDsinceiHy,  fraud,  intemperance,  or 
lust,  the  ties  of  moral  obli-j^alion  arc  thereby  necessarily  re- 
laxed ?  Could  yon,  on  great  and  critical  occasions,  rely  on 
the  integrity  of  a  man  who  should  avow  such  [)rinciple3  ? 
Would  vou  be  wilh'ng  to  entrust  to  hiiri  the  honour  and  virtue 
of  your  families,  where  he  could  violate  them  with  secrecy, 
or  with  impunity  ?  Would  not  his  passions,  his  interests,  his 
pleasures  be  thenceforward  the  supreme  law  of  his  conduct? 

But  does  not  dissoliition  of  manners  frequently  precede, 
and  itself  become  the  cause  of  the  general  corruption  of 
principle,  in  individuals,  and  in  nations  ?  It  does. — And  this 
fact  places  the  truth  of*the  proposition  which  I  have  assum- 
ed to  illustrate,  in  a  new  light.  For  so  powerful  is  the  force 
of  truth  upon  the  heart,  that  men  cannot  preserve  the  peace 
of  their  own  bosoms,  amidst  the  conflict  of  their  prin<  iples, 
with  their  actions.  They  are  obliged,  therefore,  if  they  do 
act  reject  the  law  of  Christ,  to  set  themselves  to  corrupt  and 
modify  it  if  possible,  to  the  standard  of  their  inclinations.  If 
the  laiv  of  Christ  has  not  been  able  effectually  to  constrain 
their  obedience,  they  must  shut  their  eyes  against  its  light, 
or  study,  by  every  subtil  artifice,  to  pervert  its  spirit. 

The  efficacy  of  divine  truth  early  instilled  into  the  mind, 
and  received  with  a  ^ile  temper,  is  conspicu-us,  to  a  can- 
did observer,  in  the  excellent  fruits  which  commonly  pro- 
ceed from  a  virtuous  and  pious  education,  conUucted  with 


r 


prudeoce,  and  persevered  in   with  steady  and  consistent 
trisdom. 

Remark  the  youth  who  have  been  sedulously  and  pru- 
dently instrocted  in  the  principles  of  religion:  compare 
their  sobriety,  their  temperance,  their  regular  and  exemplary 
manners,  with  the  character  and  conduct  of  such  as  have 
grown  up,  like  neglected  weeds,  without  culture.  Is  it  not 
usually,  among  these  that  the  church  finds  her  future  sup- 
ports, and  her  future  ornaments  ?  If,  in  the  course  of  life, 
they  should  be  exposed  to  temptations  which  give  too  strong 
an  action  to  their  passions,  how  long  will  their  early  princi- 
ples resist  the  corrupting  current?  How  often  will  con- 
science, roused  by  that  secret  voice  which  they  awaken  in 
the  breast,  recal  them  to  their  duty  ?  Or  when,  .for  a  season, 
like  David,  or  the  young  Solomon,  they  have  been  drawn 
aside  from  its  path,  how  often  are  these  secret  monitors,  re- 
covering force,  by  some  interesting  dispensation  of  divine 
providence,  made  the  means  of  bringing  them  back  to  their 
duty,  and  to  God,  with  humiliation  and  repentance  ?  Here 
let  me  notice,  only  to  condemn,  the  injustice  of  a  frequent 
remark,  that  the  most  serious  and  pious  education  is  com- 
monly followed  by  the  greatest  dissolution  of  manners.  So 
far  is  this  from  being  verified  by  the  fact,  that  it  is,  on  the 
other  hand,  the  comparative  rarity  ol'^the  example,  and  its 
striking  incongruity  with  our  most  reasonable  expectations, 
which  has  occasioned  its  being  so  much  noticed,  in  a  few  in- 


527 

slances,  that  the  frequency  of  the  reproach  has  been  uiiatu 
ken  for  the  commonness  of  the  effect.  And  the  fact,  where 
it  does  exist,  may  usually  be  traced  to  some  gross  defect  of 
prudence,  or  of  skill,  in  the  conduct  of  their  education. 

I  acknowledge,  indeed,  and  it  is  only  a  confirmation  of  our 
doctrine,  that  those  who  have  finally  broken  through  the  re- 
straints of  a  pious  discipline,  like  those  who  have  burst  Ihe 
bounds  of  modest  and  of  decent  manners,  are  usually  more 
profligate  than  other  sinners ;  harrassed  in  their  evil  courses 
by  their  early  principles,  they  are  often  tempted  to  run  to 
greater  excesses  than  others,  that  they  may,  at  once,  if  pos^ 
sible,  extinguish  the  distressing  light  of  truth,  and  drown  the 
reproaches  of  their  own  consciences. 

Against  the  preceding  reasonings  an  objection  has  been 
raised  from  two  interesting  facts — one  that  we  not  unfrequent- 
ly  see  men  of  vicious  manners  professing  the  best  principles  *, 
another,  that  we  find  good  men  among  all  sects  of  christians. 
True  it  is,  that  orthodox  opinions  in  religion  may  be  osten- 
sibly avowed  by  men  of  very  exceptionable  morals.  They 
may  be  merely  modes  of  speaking  received  by  inheritance, 
or  adopted  as  the  distinction  of  a  party  ;  while,  at  the  same 
time,  they  have  not  entered  deeply  into  the  convictions  of 
reason,  nor  taken  possessiaaof  the  sentiments  of  the  heart. 


f 


The  second  fact  I  do  not  deny,  but  rather  rejoice  in  its 
existence,  that  there  arc  found  pious  men,  who  are  ornaments 
of  their  holy  profession,  among  all  denominations  of  chris- 
tians. But  does  this  prove  that  there  is  no  distinction  in 
their  moral  effects  between  truth  and  falsehood  ?  or  that  all 
principles  are  equally  favourable,,* or  indifferent  to  true  reli- 
gion, and  sanctity  of  manners  ?  No,  it  is  an  interesting 
proof,  to  the  benevolent  and  candid  mind,  that  every  de- 
nomination of  christians  embraces,  in  its  system,  an  important 
portion  of  evangelical  truth.  The  great  and  central  doctrines 
of  our  salvation,  from  which  all  the  practical  principles  of 
piety  and  morals  naturally  radiate,  are  so  clearly  borne  uposs 
the  whole  face  of  the  sacred  scriptures,  that  they  are  receiv- 
ed under  one  form  of  expression,  or  another,  in  the  symbols, 
confessions,  and  creeds  of  almost  all  who  assume  to  wear  the 
name  of  christian.  Yet,  along  witk*  them,  the  frailty  of  the 
human  understanding,  or  some  latent  bias  of  the  human  heart, 
has  frequently  mingled  more  or  less  of  error,  which  propor- 
tionally impairs  their  sanctifying  influence.  As  every  truth 
is  connected  with  some  right  disposition  of  the  heart,  and 
contributes  to  promote  it ;  so  every  error,  in  a  similar  de- 
gree, tends  to  strengthen  some  sinful  propensity,  or  to  weak- 
en the  obligation  of  some  duty.  Hence  particular  sections 
of  the  church,  according  to  the  purity  and  extent  in  which 
they  embrace  the  truth  as  it  is  in  Christ,  are  distinguished 
above  others,  for  the  general  sanctity  of  their  manners;  for 
a  zeal  in  religion,  at  once  rational  and  fervent ;  and  for  the 


529 

numbers  who  adorn,  by  their  practice,  the  'locfrine  of  God 
their  Saviour.  But  among  the  truly  pious  of  all  ilenomina- 
tions,  there  is  a  greater  harmony  of  sentiment,  and  of  faith, 
than  they  themselves,  in  the  jealousy  of  party,  in  the  pride 
of  disputation,  and  even  in  the  delicate  apprehensions  for  the 
truth,  which  some  gooi!  men,  who  have  moulded  all  their 
feelings  in  religion  to  certain  set  forms  of  words,  arc  willing 
to  allow.     In  terms  they  differ  more  than  in  spirit. 

Unhappily,  indeed,  there  are  in  our  age,  a«  there  were 
in  the  age  of  the  apostles,  those  who  wear,  and  who  glo- 
ry in  the  christian  name,  who  yet  remove  the  basis  of 
Christianity,  by  denying  the  only  Lord  God,  even  our 
Lord  Jesus  Christ.  But  as  then  they  were,  they  still 
are,  known  by  the  coldness  of  their  piety,  and  the  lax- 
ness  of  their  moral  sysleai.  Spots  are  they  in  the  church, 
in  which  should  exist  only  the  continual  feast  of  christian 
love  ;  unfructifying  clouds  without  rain,  borne  about  by  the 
winds  o(  human  passions.  It  would  be  more  honour  to  the 
cause  of  Christ,  or  rather  less  dishonour,  if  they  would  re- 
ijounce  the  name  which  they  abuse. 

Having  thus  far  endeavoured  to  illustrate  the  connexion 
between  truth  and  duty ;  that  is,  between  faith,  or  the  genu- 
ine doctrines  of  the  gospel,  and  holiness  of  living— 

t)7 


530 

II.  I  proceed,  moie  directly,  to  urge  fhe  exhortation  of  the 
aposile,  to  contend  earnestly  for  the  faith,  the  fountain  and 
the  sum  of  all  good  principles  in  religion. 

If  moral  truth  were  of  no  importance,  or  if  it  were  not  es- 
sentially connected  with  our  duty,  with  our  salvation,  and 
with  the  best  interests  of  human  nature,  this  exhortation 
would  be  without  reason.  But  related  as  they  are  by  the 
immutable  constitution  of  heaven,  this  union  imposes  on  us 
inviolable  obligations,  to  seek  for  the  truth  in  religion  with 
fidelity,  to  maintain  it  with  firmness,  and  to  promote  it  with 
zeal.  The  duty  is  incumbent  on  every  christian,  in  propor- 
tion to  his  means  of  information,  and  his  opportunities  of  do- 
ing good.  It  is,  above  all,  incumbent  on  the  church  as  a 
community,  the  depositary  of  the  oracles  of  the  living  God  ; 
and  on  those,  in  a  peculiar  manner,  who  are  appointed  to  be 
her  watchmen,  her  instructors,  her  guardians,  and  examples. 

Where,  then,  is  to  be  found  that  precious  truth  which  we 
are  required  to  maintain  in  the  face  of  every  open  enemy,  or 
insidious  friend,  and  earnestly  to  promote  with  a  zeal  worthy 
of  its  high  importance.  In  this,  all  sects  concur  with  one 
voice,  that  the  pure  evangelical  truth  is  to  be  discerned  only 
in  the  holy  scriptures.  But  when  we  attempt  to  collect  it 
from  the  loose  style  of  parable  and  narrative,  in  which  it  is 
frequently  conveyed,  or  to  divest  it  of  that  oratorical,  or  po- 
etic dress  in  which  the  sacred  writers  have  often  clothed  it, 
and  reduce  it  to  plain  and  simple  propositions,  here,  I  con- 


\ 


531 

feas,  is  some  room  for  uncertainty  and  doubt.  Here  it  is 
that  men  introducing  their  own  speculations,  and  mingling 
their  own  philosophic  systems  with  the  word  of  God,  have 
corrupted  its  simplicity,  and  made  the  christian  church,  like 
the  schools  of  Greece,  a  theatre  for  the  conflict  of  contend- 
ing opinions.  Are  the  divii^  scriptures,  then,  of  doubtful  in- 
terpretation ?  Or  do  they  afford  any  ground  for  this  gladia- 
torial play  of  intellect  ?  No,  they  are  full  of  light  ;  hut  like 
all  the  manifestations  of  the  will  of  God,  in  the  works  both  of 
creation  and  providence,  they  are  liable  to  be  misinterpreted 
by  ignorance,  or  perverted  by  some  dishonesty  of  the  heart, 
>Dr  by  some  mistaken  bias  of  education.  They  are  a  fountain 
of  truth  to  thof=e  who  submit  themselves  with  humilitv  to  the 
wisdom  of  God,  and  who,  with  genuine  simplicity  of  spirit, 
have  no  other  aim  but  to  discern  in  them  their  own  duty, 
and  no  concern  but  to  understand  the  will  of  their  heavenly 
Father,  in  order  to  obey  it.  If,  with  these  dispositions,  we 
approach  the  siiudy  of  thd'holy  scriptures,  although  some  un- 
avoidable errors  should  still  adhere  to  the  frailty  of  the  hu- 
man understanding,  wq  cannot  materially  swerve  from  that 
system  of  truth  whicl^as  disciples  of  Christ,  we  are  called 
to  defend.  And  in  tha|  field  of  human  infirmity  in  w  Inch  we 
may  be  permitted  to  err,  we  shall  find  ground  for  the  mutual 
exercise  of  charity  with  our  fellow-christiana. 

Are,  then,  all  portions  of  scripture,  all  the  tenets  which 
enter  into  the  body  of  our  creed,  equally  the  objects  of  that 
holy  zeal  required  by  the  apostle  ic  tIelcLce  of  il.e  faith 


532 

Every  ti'uth  of  the  gospel  is  precious  to  a  real  believeh 
Bu  peculiarly  precious  are  (hose  fundamental  doctrines  on 
wh.ch  the  whole  fabric  of  Christianity  rests.  If  I  may  be 
permitted  to  make  this  selection,  they  are  the  doctrines  of 
the  atonement — of  the  ageticjf  of  the  Holy  Spirit — of  the  re- 
generation of  the  hear- — of  the  free  grace  of  God  in  the  sal- 
vation of  the  world — of  the  final  judgment— of  the  resurrec- 
tion of  the  body — and  the  life  everlasting.  They  are  to 
him,  in  the  language  of  a  great  reformer,  articiilce  stantis  nut 
cadentis  ecclesicp.,  articles  by  which  ihe  church  must  stand 
or  fall.  ^ 

To  truth,  a  pure  mind  atlachess  itself  with  a  powerful  at- 
traction. It  is  the  image  of  the  divine  wisdom.  It  is  the 
glory  of  God  that  he  is  the  fountain  ©f  truth.  To  declare 
the  truth  to  the  world  the  Saviour  became  incarnate.  To 
give  it  efficacy  on  the  hearts  of  men,  the  Holy  Spirit  has 
been  shed  upon  his  church.  The  pursuit  and  discovery  of 
(ruth,  with  wider  and  still  wider  eKtent,  will  be  among  the 
most  delightful  employments  of  the  redeemed  in  heaven. 
With  the  progress  of  evangelic  truth  i^on  earth,  is  connected 
the  glory  of  God,  the  honour  of  the  Redeemer,  the  highest 
and  best  interests  of  mankind,  objects  peculiarly  dear  to 
every  sincere  disciple  of  Jesus  Christ.-  With  fervour,  there- 
fore will  he  embrace  it  from  the  heart,  and  with  unceasing 
??eal  will  he  study  to  promote  It 


533 

A  superior  duty  is  imposed  upon  the  ministers  of  religion 
tvho  are  appointed  as  watchmen  upon  the  walls  of  Ziun,  and 
as  heralds  to  the  world  of  the  glad  tidings  of  salvation. 
They  are  sety  in  the  language  of  the  apostle, /or  </ie  defence 
of  the  gospel.  Among  their  first  cares,  it  ought  to  be,  as  far 
as  possible,  (o  preserve  the  church  from  corruption  of  prin- 
ciple, and  to  cultivate  within  it  that  unity  of  sentiment,  and 
harmony  in  interpreting  the  great  doctrines  of  religion,  so 
necessary  to  the  peace  and  order  of  the  body  oj  Christ. 
When  conflicting  doctrines  are  preached  in  the  same  church, 
the  principles  of  the  people  become  unsettled.  To  tempo- 
rary scepticism,  succeeds  indifference  (o  truth ;  a  state  of 
mind  not  much  less  dangerous  than  error  itself. 
/ 

I  fear  not  to  be  charged  with  illiberality,  though  I  assert 
that,  if  among  those  who  are  otherwise  agreed  in  the  distin- 
guishing doctrines  of  Christianity,  there  are  such  differences 
of  opinion,  even  upon  minor  points,  as  would  disturb  iho  har- 
mony of  their  devotions,  let  them  worship  God  in  separate 
communions.  The  existence  of  various  denominations  may 
even  be  attended  wi^  some  advantages  ;  and  where  their 
members  are  found  walking  agreeably  to  the  commandment 
of  Christ,  they  may  embrace  one  another  in  the  spirit  of  chris- 
tian charity.  But  union  in  the  same  body  ought  sacredly  to 
be  preserved.  Division  on  the  other  hand,  and  on  the  other 
that  extreme  of  charity,  which  indicates  an  inditlereuce  to 
truth,  are,  in  the  iiigbest  degree,  pernicious.     "  iie  of  one 


634 

mmi\.     Endeavour  to  keep  the  umiy  of  the  spirit,  in  the  bond 
of  peace." 

But  the  injunction  of  the  sacred  writer,  in  this  passage,  imr 
plies  an  obligation  not  only  to  maintain  the  purity  of  the  faithj 
and,  as  far  as  possible,  its  unity  ;  but  to  defend  it  against 
every  enemy,  and  to  promote  with  all  our  powers  of  persua- 
sion and  reason,  its  holy  influence  over  the  hearts  of  men. 

The  humble  and  benevolent  religion  of  Jesus  Christ,  al- 
ways obnoxious  to  the  corruptions  of  the  human  heart,  is 
obliged  incessantly  to  combat  with  open,  or  insidious  enemies, 
and  to  meet  them  in  their  ever  new,  ^nd  ever  varying  modes 
of  attack.  It  is  assailed  by  inveterate  foes  from  without,  or 
betrayed  by  false  and  pretended  frieniis  within  the  bosom  of 
the  church  itself.  In  no  age  have  enemies  more  numerous, 
or  more  subtil,  erected  themselves  against  the  standard  of  the 
cross.  Not,  indeed,  armed  with  power,  and  foUotred  by 
flames,  as  in  ages  past ;  but  more  tol»e  dreaded,  perhaps,  by 
pure  and  undefiled  religion,  they  come  armed  with  all  the 
subtilty  of  a  false  and  ostentatious  sci^ce,  and  supported  by 
the  dissolution  of  the  public  manners. 

The  press  is  often  a  good  criterion  of  the  state  of  the  pub- 
lic morals,  and  the  public  taste.  Look  over  the  list  of  new. 
publications  in  Europe.  Examine  thp  catalogues  of  those 
writings  which  obtain  the  favour  of  the  most  numerous  class 
cf  readers,  both  therC;  and  in  our  own  country.     What  do 


you  see  in  these  writers  but  continual  incentives  thrown  out 
to  «onMjpt  the  imagination,  and  inflame  the  passions  of  the 
young  ?  What  but  a  shameless  sophistry  designeil  to  eman- 
cipate every  hist  of  the  heart  from  the  remaining  restraints  of 
religion  ?  VVh;»t  but  continual  efforts  to  undermine  the  foun- 
dations of  the  gospel,  and  boldly  to  tear  down  the  walls  and 
the  ramparts  of  our  christian  Zion  ?  Kvcn  the  lencei  of 
nalural  religion  are  attempted  to  be  overthrown.  The  ex- 
istence of  God  has  been  called  in  question  by  a  delirious  phi- 
losophy ;  his  providence  over  the  world  has  been  resolved 
into  contingency,  or  fate  ;  the  appreliensions  of  futurity  have 
been  derided  as  childish  fears  ;  and  human  nature  robbed  of 
its  most  precious  treasure  in  the  hopes  of  a  happy  and  immor- 
tal existence,  only  that  religion  may  not  derive  from  them  any 
efFectual  control  o\  er  the  consciences  of  men.  All  the  pow- 
ers of  learning,  wit,  and  perverted  genius,  have  been  assem- 
bled against  the  glory  of  the  Saviour.  A  kind  of  traditionary 
respect,  indeed,  is  still  pretended  to  be  paid  to  the  name  of 
virtue  :  but  a  name  it  is,  and  nothing  more.  It  does  not  pre- 
vent the  outrage  of  almost  every  duty  which  a  creature  owes 
to  his  Creator.  It  does  not  impede  the  indulgence  of  the 
most  atrocious  passions  under  the  abused  name  of  honour; 
nor  the  violation  of  the  most  sacred  ties  of  society,  of  friend- 
ship, of  humanity  u^der  the  pretence  of  an  innocent  pursuit 
of  pleasure.  A  deluge  of  infidelity  in  the  old  world  is  sweep- 
ing before  it  principles  and  morals,  and  has,  long  since,  be- 
gun to  roll  its  fearful  tide  to  the  new.  Along  with  ancient 
corruptions  in  governoaent  and  religion,  it  threatens  to  d^ 


536 

sfroy  religion  and  government  themselves ;  and  to  over- 
whelm,  in  undistinguishing  ruin,  whatever  is  rendered  ven- 
erable by  time,  and  sacred  by  its  relations  to  God,  and  the 
felicity  of  human  society.  And  the  new  clouds  which  are 
gathering  in  our  horizon  at  this  moment,  look  dark  and  dis- 
mal. In  this  day  of  trouble,  of  rebuke,  and  blasphemy, 
what  is  the  duty  of  the  watchmen  on  the  walls  of  Zion  ?  Arc 
they  not  called  to  increasing  diligence,  to  higher  efforts  of 
faith  and  constancy,  to  more  fervent  zeal,  to  greater  sacrifi- 
ces in  the  cause  of  the  Redeemer,  more  earnestly  than  ever 
to  contend  for  the  faith  once  delivered  to  the  saints  ?  Truth, 
indeed,  which  is  eternal,  although  it  may  seem,  for  a  season, 
to  be  vanquished  by  the  powers  of  darkness,  will  eventually 
prevail  over  all  the  variable  forms  of  error  ;  but  its  weapons 
require  to  be  wielded  by  skilful,  and  by  honest  hands. 

In  order  to  fulfd  the  requisition  of  the  text,  therefore, 
the  ministry  of  the  gospel,  ought  to  possess  both  talents, 
which  will  enable  them  to  meet  the  foe  upon  equal  ground  ; 
zud  fidelity,  which  will  never  shrink  from  any  labour,  or  any 
danger,  which  it  may  be  necessary  to  encounter  in  the  Re- 
deemer's  cause. 

Will  it  not  then  be  esteemed  reasonable  to  assert,  that  the 
ministers  of  religion  ought  always  to  stand  in  the  foremost 
ranks  of  literature  and  science  in  their  country.  And  it  is 
a  fact  which  will  hardly  be  disputed,  that,  hitherto,  the 
world  has  owed  more  to  its  religious  orders  for  the  cultivation, 


.r 

537 


and  progress  of  letters,  than  to  all  other  classes  of  sociely. 
This  is  a  general  proposition  which  extends  beyond  the  chria 
tian  church,  to  those  in  every  nation  who  are  supremely  oc- 
cupied in  the  studies  and  concerns  of  religion.  The  Ma- 
gians  and  the  Bramins,  the  priests  of  India  and  of  Persia 
were  the  scholars,  and  instructors  of  those  great  nations. 
The  schools  of  Ihe prophets  were  the  seminaries  of  litera- 
ture among  the  people  of  Israel.  The  sacerdotal  colleges 
of  Egypt  were  the  schools  of  Greece,  whicii  afterwards  be- 
came the  school  of  the  universe.  After  the  overthrow  of 
the  Roman  empire  by  the  northern  tribes,  nothing  contrib- 
uted so  much  to  extend  among  those  ignorant  and  rude  bar- 
barians, the  influence  of  Christianity,  and  by  degrees  to  ame- 
liorate their  savage  planners,  as  the  superior  knowledge,  as 
well  as  piety  of  the  great  body  of  the  ciiriatian  clergy.  In 
the  churches  and  monasteries,  to  whatever  objections  the 
latter  afterwards  became  liable,  were  preserved  those  sparks 
of  ancient  learning  wlfich  served  to  re-kindle  the  flame  of 
modern  science.  To  the  clergy,  almost  exclusively,  we 
owe  the  brilliant  resurrection  of  letters  in  the  fifteenth,  and 
sixteenth  centuries.  And  in  their  hands,  ever  since,  baa 
been  deservedly  placed  the  direction  of  learning  ;  and  with 
them  it  is  likely  to  remain.  Is  this  a  language  which  ought  to 
create  offence  to  anjy  order  of  men  T  No ;  it  ought  only  to 
awaken  a  generous  emulation  among  the  real  friends  of  reli- 
gion and  learning  of  all  professions.  And  I  am  willing  to 
urge  this  point  the  farther,  at  present,  for  the  sake  of  so  ma- 


538 

uj  young  men  who  are  here  before  you,  with  the  view  of  dis 
voting  themselves  to  the  holy  ministry. 

To  (hem  permit  me  to  say,  that  true  piety  is  first,  and 
above  all  things  necessary  in  a  minister  of  Christ.  But, 
next  to  this,  and  not  much  less  important,  is  sound  science, 
and  general  literature,  that  he  may  be  able  to  confirm  the 
truth,  and  convince  gainsayers,  and  that,  in  delivering  and 
defending  the  gospel,  he  may  be  able  to  bring  from  his 
treasures  things  new  and  old  ;  and  acquire  that  ascendency 
over  the  minds  of  men,  which  acknowledged  virtue,  a  lumin- 
ous eloquence,  and  extensive  information  alone  can  give. 
That  on  trite  subjects,  he  may  be  always  new.  That,  hav- 
ing fixed  himself  in  the  hearts  of  his  people,  by  faithfulness 
in  every  duty  of  the  pastoral  office,  he  may  take  possession  of 
their  understandings  also,  by  his  ability  to  teach.  Lamenta- 
ble is  the  falling  oflf  when  a  young  pastor,  who  has  at  first 
been  well  received,  exhausts  his  \\\\\e  fund,  in  a  few  of  his 
early  discourses.  The  repetition  of  the  same  truths,  how- 
ever important,  in  nearly  the  same  language  becomes  insipid 
even  to  a  pious  audience.  To  every  candidate  for  this  holy 
oflSce,  therefore,  let  me  insist,  that  his  preparations  for  ap- 
pearing in  it  with  dignify  and  usefulness,  should  be  neither 
superficial,  nor  hasty  ;  and  to  e\ery  minister,  may  I  be  per- 
mitted to  add,  that  his  studies  never  should  end  but  with 
his  life. 


539 

If  those  who  publish  the  gospel  to  mankind  ou{;ht  to  be 
(Scribes  well  insiructed  in  (he  law  of  Christ,  for  the  edifica- 
tion  of  the  church,  not  less  re*t[ui8ite  is  it  that  Ihey  be  fur- 
nished with  all  the  resources  of  human  science,  in  order  to 
repel  those  enemies  of  the  faith,  who,  by  an  abuse  of  learn- 
ing, and  a  shameful  misapplication  of  llie  talents  which  God 
has  given  them,  are  endeavouring  to  overturn,  to  their  foun- 
dations, his  glorious  city,  and  temple.     The   philosophers 
arc  setting  themselves  against  the  ministers  of  religion,  the 
schools  against  the  altars.     But  wielding  as  you  do,  in  this 
spiritual  conC-ict,  the  mighty  force  of  truth,  your  encour- 
agement is,  that,  you  must  prevail,  if  you  are  not  reproach- 
fully delinquent  to  the  king  of  Zion.     I  am  aware  that  fnany 
pious  men  regard  all  considerations  of  this  nature  as  pai  tak- 
ing too  much  of  the  spirit  and  poh'cy  of  the  world.     They 
profess  to  place  all  their  reliance,  not  on  any  human  means^ 
but  solely  on  the  omnipotence  of  divine  grace  ;  and  strangely 
seek  a  refuge  for  their  own  indolence  in  the  abused  doctrine 
of  the  operations  of  the  Holy  Spirit.     Almighty  God  has  es- 
tablished, in  the  constitution  of  nature,  a  certain  connexion 
between  the  means  and  the  end  ;  and  never  does  Jie  depart 
from  this  order,  which  is  his  will,  except  where  the  occasion 
demands  a  miracle.      Shall  we  then  faithlessly  suffer  the 
temple  of  the  LivmgGod  to  be  levelled  to  the  dust,  by  the 
attacks  of  so  many  insidious  adversaries  as  assail  it  on  every 
side,  while  we  look  on  with  a  lazy  and  indifferent  gaze,  under 
pretence  of  doing  honour  to  the  sovereignty  of  divine  grace  ? 
Or  since  the  church  shall  last  while  the  Bun  and  the  moon  en- 


540 

tjure,  will  not  God  wrest  her  interests  out  of  our  hands,  and 
commit  ibem  to  hands  more  worthy  to  defend  them? 

Will  it  be  said,  what  learning  can  do,  has  been  done  al- 
ready ?  That  the  learned  and  pious  divines  of  the  last,  and 
preceding  century  have  furnished  the  churcb  xrith  the  ablest 
defences  of  revelation,  with  the  most  admirable  elucidations 
of  the  sacked  writings,  with  the  most  victorious  refutations  of 
the  principles  of  infidelity  ?  It  is  true,- — and  the  praise  of 
these  wise  and  holy  men  is  in  all  th6  churches.  But  if  we 
have  not  ourselves  skill  and  force  for  the  combat,  how  shall 
we  be  able  to  wield  the  armour  of  Saul?  God  most  justly  ex- 
pects, that  we  should  bring  to  the  service  of  his  altar  every 
human  aid,  as  well  as  every  divine  g^ace.  Be  ye  wise  as 
serpents,  saith  the  Saviour,  and  liarmhss  as  doves.  And 
what  doth  the  apostle,  who  possessed  all  the  arts  of  Grfeece, 
and  all  the  divine  learning  of  Israel,  intend  by  these  injunc- 
tions to  his  son  Timothy  ;  "  Till  1  come,  give  attendance  to 
reading,  to  exhortation,  to  doctrine.  Neglect  not  the  gift 
that  is  in  thee.  Meditate  upon  these  things.  Give  thyself 
wholly  to  them,  that  thy  piofiting  may  appear  unto  all  !*'  Can 
the  divine  author  intend,  according  to  the  views  of  some  weak 
and  enthusiastic  sects,  that,  in  devoutly  reading  the  sacred 
writings,  God  imparts  some  extraordinary  influx  of  the  Ho- 
ly Spirit,  to  render  their  meaning  clear ;  thus  making  one  in- 
spiration necessary  originally  to  communicate  the  scriptures 
to  the  apostles  and  prophets  of  old,  and  another  to  the 
church  in  the  present  day,  to  enable  it  to  understand  them? 


541 

With  prayer  and  pious  meditation,  indeed,  every  clirislian 
ought  devoutl/  to  study  them.  The  more  nearly  we  can 
laise  (he  soul  to  the  tone  of  pioii5  fervour,  and  sublime  devo- 
tion, in  which  the  prophets  and  apostles  composed  their  sa- 
cred hymns,  their  divine  histories,  and  epistles,  the  more  we 
shall  perceive  the  spiritual  beauties  of  the  word  of  God  ; 
the  more  clear,  and  impressive  will  its  heavenly  truths  be  to 
the  heart.  But  let  all  who  are  preparing  to  enter  into  this 
holy  office  be  assured  that  there  is  hardly  an  art,  or  branch 
of  knowledge,  in  the  whole  circle  of  science,  or  of  literature, 
from  which  some  useful  illustration  of  the  sacred  writings 
may  not  be  drawn. 

Id  earnestly  contending  for  the  failhy  in  the  next  place, 
talents  alone  are  not  sufficient  to  acquit  your  high  and  holy 
duties  to  God  and  the  church.  Fidelity  in  the  discharge  of 
all  the  functions  of  the  sacred  ministry  is  not  less  necessary. 
That  is,  plainness  and  integrity  in  declaring  the  whole  coun- 
sel of  God,  a  spirit  of  warm  and  unaffected  devotion,  and  un- 
wearied diligence  in  the  offices  of  your  holy  calling,  arising 
from  a  deep  conviction  of  the  value  of  immortal  souls,  and  the 
infinite  importance  of  the  sacred  cause  in  which  you  are  en- 
gaged. Without  genuine  piety,  and  holy  zeal,  the  labour  of 
preaching  the  gospel  must  be  both  unpleasant  and  unfruit- 
ful. With  what  comfort,  or  etfect  can  a  cold,  fof;nal>  or 
worldly  minded  man  preach  the  doctrines  of  repentan<e,  of 
self-denial,  of  purity  of  heart,  of  sanctity  of  life  ?  B:;^  di\  ine 
truth  illustrated  with  clearness,  declared  with  iaiiaiuiness. 


542 

anc!  flowing  from  a  heart  deeply  affected  with  the  eternal  ia- 
tei'tJsJs  of  mankind,  possesses  a  majesty  and  force,  that  sub- 
due thef  mind,  an  illumination  and  conviction  <hat  penetrate 
the  soul,  a  tenderness  and  persuasion  that  touch  and  move  all 
the  springs  of  action  in  the  heart.  "  It  commends  itself  to 
every  man's  conscience  in  the  sight  of  God." 

As  there  is  every  thing  in  the  subject  to  awaken  the  zeal 
of  a  sincere  christian,  and  especially,  of  a  faithful  minister  of 
Jesus  Christ,  in  publishing  the  glad  tidings  of  salvation  to  a 
guilty  world,  and  carrying  the  standard  of  the  cross  through 
the  ranks  of  opposing  enemies,  so  there  is  every  thing  in  the 
circumstances  of  the  present  time,  to  raise  that  zeal  to  an  un- 
usual fervor.— Impiety  has  broken  in  like  a  Sood  upon  the 
nations,  and  is  carrying  before  it,  not  the  young  and  inexpe- 
rienced alone  or  those  who  have  made  it  their  interest,  by 
Qnholy  living,  to  embrace  the  principles  of  infidelity  ;  but  we 
see  borne  on  the  tide  philosophers,  legislators,  magistrates, 
those  who  should  be  the  instructors  of  mankind,  who  should 
be  the  guardians  of  the  public  morals,  who,  seated  in  the 
throne  of  the  laws,  should  be  examples  of  virtue  and  obedi- 
cnce  to  the  people.  It  already  threatens  to  bear  with  it 
the  mass  of  society,  if  Almighty  God,  to  whose  throne  we 
daily  send  our  supplications  to  defend  us  from  this  calamity, 
do  not  interpose  to  arrest  the  overwhelming  flood,  saying  to 
its  rage  "  hitherto  shalt  thou  come,  and  no  farther  ;  and  here 
shall  thy  proud  waves  be  stayed."  From  the  prevalence  of 
corrupted  manners,  I  see  a  fatal  evil  invade  the  church  it- 


M 


^43 

self,  ''Because  iniquily  abounds  tlie  love  of  many  waxa» 
cold."  The  wise  and  even  the  waUhtnen  on  the  walls  of 
Zion,  seem  to  be  asleep  along  with  the  secure  and  unappre- 
heosive  crowd  oi foolish  virgins.  The  present  seems  to  b« 
the  reign  of  evil  ova-  a  great  part  of  the  world  which  ralla  it- 
self christian.  And  Christ  may  now  say  as  he  ilid  to  his 
persecutors  and  murderers,  "this  is  your  hour,  aiid  the  pow- 
er of  darkness." 

If  we  see  the  blessed  gospel  openly  and  almost  triumphant- 
ly insulted  by  powerful  enemies,  is  it  not  also  in  many  parts 
of  the  church,  insidiously  corrupted  by  false  friends  ?  Where 
it  is  still  preached  with  a  degree  of  evangelic  purity,  does  it 
not  seem  to  fall  powerless  from  the  lips  of  those  who  are  ap- 
pointed to  proclaim  its  grace  to  the  world  ?  For  many  yeara 
we  have  seen  the  columns  of  civil  society,  and  the  temples 
of  religion  falling  together.  We  have  heard  the  horrible 
crash  at  a  distance.  We  have  sometimes  felt  the  earth  trem- 
ble under  our  feet,  to  warn  us  of  our  approaching  danger. 
Roused  for  a  moment,  we  hav^  only  sunk  down  again  into 
asleep  like  the  sleep  of  death. — Can  occasions  more  loudly 
call,  shall  I  say,  on  the  ministers  of  religion  ?  Shall  I  not  say 
on  all  christians?  1  was  going  to  say  on  all  good  citizens,  ear- 
nestly to  contend  for  the  faith,  for  the  purity  of  those  prin- 
cif  le-  of  morahty  and  piety,  for  the  blessedness  ot  those  im- 
mortal hopes,  once  delivered  to  the  saints?  To  stem  the  in- 
creasing torrent  of  impiety— to  arre-^t  the  di^solllll..n  of  the 
public  morali — to  promote  the  designs  of  divine  mercy  to 


r 


544 

aiankind — to  recal  the  departing  glory  to  our  churches — to 
exalt  the  grace  of  the  ever  blessed  Redeemer — to  reanimate 
the  ahnost  extinguished  love  of  his  disciples  to  him,  and  to 
one  another.  My  brethren  in  the  holy  ministry !  who  is 
sutlicient  for  these  things  ?  Although  we  might  justly  trem- 
ble when  we  contemplate  the  weakness  of  the  human  i«»atru- 
ment,  be  encouraged,  holy  brethren !  by  the  example  of  the 
apostle,  who  hath  said  through  Christ  we  can  do  all  things. 

The  political,  the  moral,  and  religious  horizon  looks  dark 
and  gloomy.  The  tempest,  which  has  shaken  half  the  world, 
threatens,  as  we  have  long  foreseen,  to  extend  its  fury  to  us. 
Yet,  in  the  gathering  cloud,  I  seem  to  see  some  luminous 
spots  which  invite  us  not  to  despair.  In  every  event,  how- 
ever, which  may  chequer  the  mysterious  aspect  of  divine 
providence,  one  truth  is  certain,  one  truth  should  console 
you,  my  dear  brethren,  "  be  you  faithful  unto  death,  and 
you  shall  receive  a  crown  of  life." 

Now  to  the  Father,  to  the  >S^>  f^^^d  to  the  Holy  Ghost, 
be  glory,  as  it  ivas  in  the  beginning,  is  now,  and  ever  shall 
be  world  without  end  ! — AMEN  ! 

THE  END-  M 


958.21 


Sine  5 


o 


S&^r 


•  in 


BOUND 

DEC  2  1  1954 


